<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TEL</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Theoretical Economics Letters</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2078</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/tel.2014.47064</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">TEL-48214</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>BUSINESS &amp; ECONOMICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A Note on Dynamic Roy’s Identity</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Libo</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kam</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Economics, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>libxu@ucalgary.ca(LX)</email>;<email>kam.yu@lakeheadu.ca(KY)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>29</day><month>07</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>513</fpage><lpage>516</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>We derive two forms of Roy’s identity for a dynamic consumption model.
The results are potentially useful in theoretical and empirical studies.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Roy’s Identity</kwd><kwd> Inter-Temporal Consumption</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Roy’s identity is a useful tool in theoretical and empirical studies of static consumption problems. Most dynamic consumer problems, however, concentrate on obtaining the optimal consumption path derived from the Euler equation. In this note we assume that the consumer makes decision in a two-stage process. In the dynamic stage, two forms of Roy’s identity are derived. The first form relates the asset holding in each period to the marginal utility of interest rate and the marginal utility of income. The second form resembles the classic Roy’s identity in the static analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Dynamic Roy’s Identity</title><p>The consumer is supposed to be making a two-stage decision. In the first stage, an inter-temporal decision on aggregate consumption and saving is made. Abstract from uncertainty about the future, a simple model of the decision problem can be set up as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula909"><label>(1)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\d8fc5783-1e0a-46f0-97e3-071a6cb73288.png"/></disp-formula><p>subject to the budget constraints</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula910"><label>(2)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\ee4a963a-e15d-4bbc-9f5f-327c09ce6cd9.png"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\0de80232-5c37-4736-bea8-15900eb35dea.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\6f3ba3a3-d0e8-44cb-bfce-6ffb6af562ec.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\5f96ed27-8d02-4e07-bb4d-e408542b32cf.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are exogenous asset, income, and interest rate respectively in period<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\46da9723-2615-4242-9e96-b8cdbbe6e4c4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\d86ef48e-8095-40ec-b7cb-b342cdcee209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The choice variables are <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\94c94ce8-bc26-4c10-a459-d125bfb7837c.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\c4bc6498-d1c6-4082-9c25-a4b947594367.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Utility is modelled by a stationary and separable discounted sum of utility function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\09e04f46-dd73-43c5-b276-d76ed0d1f6cc.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in each period1. The Lagrangian is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula911"><label>(3)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\73ba03b9-1ecf-47af-a084-cc02647174c1.png"/></disp-formula><p>The first-order conditions are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula912"><label>(4)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\2f5e7fed-774e-4a61-afad-04196fec6eb1.png"/></disp-formula><p>and the budget constraint (2).</p><p>The optimal solution is characterized by the Euler equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula913"><label>(5)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\b1312e18-09d5-40a0-8a5b-71a5c11aeab1.png"/></disp-formula><p>and the consumption function (in the case of constant interest rate)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula914"><label>(6)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\f241870d-bb0f-494f-939a-e72ff74363d5.png"/></disp-formula><p>which implies that in the steady state consumption in each period is a fixed portion of total wealth. The indirect utility function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\2ad342e5-53ca-4e00-b105-78d65c69cfae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is obtained by substituting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\74647ee0-89ec-4072-b12d-302824fb5f77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (6) into the objective function in (1).</p><p>In the second stage, the consumer makes decisions on how much to buy in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\7a99e7f8-cc3f-49ba-a2cd-e705fd82857a.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> number of goods and services in the market given the market prices <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\af410ea9-15ea-4af1-8cd4-611ed529accb.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the aggregate consumption <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\84220958-360a-4d98-b939-7e0791a7cfc4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in each period<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\3ed8a295-4d76-42d5-818d-a5f2ccdad6b3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The model becomes the standard consumer optimization problem in microeconomics, that is,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula915"><label>(7)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\366ff754-6ede-4013-a3de-b4dd29294cbb.png"/></disp-formula><p>subject to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula916"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\d0bceff8-d53b-4ca3-981e-77f3f856e206.png"/></disp-formula><p>The indirect utility function in each period <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\0a73a8a1-bbae-4f5b-a30f-5088ad059775.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula917"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\768478b8-082e-43db-a702-3a1e3a92a2d4.png"/></disp-formula><p>Roy’s identity relates the optimal consumption of each good or service to the marginal disutility of price and the marginal utility of income, that is,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula918"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\feb0da95-7067-494f-9ca8-6e91ee917cb4.png"/></disp-formula><p>for every good <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\8a4e56f3-8978-4795-be99-8219d34cb740.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in every period<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\b92856a0-f306-4447-8096-09b0a46d5200.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In other words, consumption of each good depends on the consumer’s preference structure and the relative price of the good to other goods and services.</p><p>Can we have Roy’s identity for the inter-temporal consumption problem in the first stage? Apply the envelop theorem to (3), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula919"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\897e4100-e646-41a4-90cc-2dadf64ab051.png"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the first-order condition (4) into the above gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula920"><label>(8)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\1500957a-c1ad-4d4f-b427-011d07f534fe.png"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula921"><label>(9)</label><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\77505d07-568a-49bb-aa21-e92a29396fb4.png"/></disp-formula><p>Combining (8) and (9) gives the Roy’s identity for the inter-temporal consumption problem as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula922"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\c4c33ecc-bf3e-430b-be56-8d71177d2863.png"/></disp-formula><p>It says that in any period if the consumer is in debt<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\41b014cc-e8e1-4383-b238-78217c1562df.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the marginal utility of an interest rate increase is negative.</p><p>A Roy’s identity similar to the static form can be obtained by considering the “cake-eating” problem by assuming that income <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\81f75a58-073a-4eb5-82db-a5267e6640ae.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the budget constraint (2) in each period is zero. Then the inter-temporal budget constraint is reduced to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula923"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\5b0b5849-04ec-491f-87aa-7baf1ecc01c5.png"/></disp-formula><p>If we define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula924"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\612d15c1-d901-48c2-9fe1-22bfdbba07d0.png"/></disp-formula><p>then the intertemporal utility maximization problem becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula925"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\9d39a830-a9be-43cb-894b-f30b5f9a2e60.png"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula926"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\9d39a830-a9be-43cb-894b-f30b5f9a2e60.png"/></disp-formula><p>Notice that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\137f4f2e-623e-41f7-9c05-ec1296c3ca7b.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\edc589e0-25b9-4442-b099-40d7a799a5e8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Starting in Period 1, price of consumption is decreasing over time due to discounting. The indirect utility function can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula927"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\f6311f73-52e8-4083-b297-4ee5052dcb08.png"/></disp-formula><p>Roy’s identity, in this case, is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.48214-formula928"><inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="http://file.scirp.org/Html/htmlimages\1-1500567x\79a118ae-2c2b-4c0e-bdce-119f6c052797.png"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusion</title><p>We have used the envelop theorem to derive two forms of Roy’s identity under an infinite horizontal consumption setting. In the first form, asset holding is related to the marginal utility of interest rate and marginal utility of income. The result can be used as a structural restriction on empirical analysis of inter-temporal consumption. In the second form prices are interpreted as future discount factors. The resulting form resembles the static Roy’s identity.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.48214-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CARTER, M. (2001) FOUNDATIONS OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS. THE MIT PRESS, CAMBRIDGE.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.48214-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WICKENS, M. (2011) MACROECONOMIC THEORY: A DYNAMIC GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH. 2ND EDITION, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, PRINCETON.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>