<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7408</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojoph.2014.42007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph-45872</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>MEDICINE &amp; HEALTHCARE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Ocular Surface Disease Index in Glaucomatous Patients Treated with Bimatoprost</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Italo</surname><given-names>Giuffrè</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, Catholic University of Rome, Roma, Italy</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>italogiuffre@libero.it</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>05</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>36</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2014</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
	


	Objectives: To compare ocular surface changes induced via glaucoma
treatment in patients using fixed combinations of bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol
0.50%, timolol 0.50% or bimatoprost 0.01% eye drops. Methods: This is a
prospective, one center, open-label clinical trial. It was performed on 60
glaucoma patients between 01-01-2012 and 12-31-2012. These patients were
randomly divided in three subgroups: bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.50% fixed
combination, timolol 0.50% and bimatoprost 0.01%. The Ocular Surface Disease
Index (O.S.D.I.) was evaluated in all the glaucomatous patients of the three
subgroups at basal time and after 6 and 12 months. All the results were
statistically evaluated by Student t-test and one-way ANOVA. The results were
considered statistically significant if p &lt; 0.05. Results: All of the
patients ended the clinical trial. There was no statistical significant
difference between patients treated with the bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.50%
fixed combination and timolol 0.50% eye drops alone (p = 0.845). Instead, there
was a statistically significant difference between bimatoprost 0.01% and bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.50% patients
(p = 0.05) and between bimatoprost 0.01% and timolol 0.50% eye drops alone (p =
0.049). Conclusions: This is a clinical trial based not on the hypotonising
effect of these drugs but on their tolerability. The drug which showed the best
tolerability is bimatoprost 0.01%. 


	
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bimatoprost 0.01%</kwd><kwd> Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.50% Fixed Combination</kwd><kwd> Glaucoma</kwd><kwd> OSDI</kwd><kwd>  Timolol 0.50%</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Glaucoma is a chronic, multifactorial, progressive optic neuropathy that needs long-term treatment with topical hypotensive medications. Several classes of drugs are currently available to treat this condition, including not- selective and selective beta-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, prostaglandin (PG) and prostamide analo- gues as well as fixed combinations (Fcs) of prostaglandin/prostamide analogues combined with 0.50% timolol maleate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref3">3</xref>] . In the Literature, there is also a bimatoprost formulated in DuraSite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref4">4</xref>] . Bimatoprost 0.01% and bimatoprost 0.03% were also compared as adherence and persistence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref5">5</xref>] and from an economic point of view [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Beta-blockers are often used to treat glaucoma and were considered the “gold standard” for starting glaucoma treatment until recently, when they were replaced by prostaglandin and prostamide analogues. Beta-blockers have many systemic side-effects, including bradycardia, and bronchospasms, as well as effects on the central nervous system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>While the systemic side-effects induced by topical PG analogues are rare, iris hyperpigmentation, excessive eyelash growth and conjunctival hyperemia have been reported among the local side-effects caused by these drugs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref8">8</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Ocular surface dysfunction has also been related to glaucoma treatment. Beta-blockers have been known to induce conjunctival hyperemia, punctate keratitis and corneal anesthesia, as well as dry eye and allergic blepha- roconjunctivitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref11">11</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref13">13</xref>] . Indeed, the lengh of administration, concentration and amount of these drugs have been related to the severity of the side-effects. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the OSDI in glaucomat- ous patients using bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.50% fixed combination (BTFC; Ganfort<sup>&#174;</sup>, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA), timolol 0.50% or bimatoprost 0.01% (Lumigan 0.1<sup>&#174;</sup>, Allergan, Irvine, CA, USA) eye drops alone.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Inclusion Criteria</title><p>Eligible patients were adults (&gt;18 years of age) with a clinical diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in both eyes and with no previous topical hypotensive treatment. These patients had an open iridocorneal angle upon gonioscopy examination. OAG was diagnosed on the basis of typical optic disc changes and glaucomatous visu- al field loss demonstrated on the Humphrey visual field analyzer (HFA) (Humphrey Instruments, Inc., Zeiss Humphrey, San Leandro, California, USA). Intraocular pressure (IOP), measured at 8 am, corrected by pachy- metry, was over 25 mmHg at baseline. In addition, patients were required to have a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/70 or better in each eye. These patients had a recent (within three months) visual field examination showing a mean deviation greater than—15 dB. Finally, the eligible patients were required to be able to follow instructions, to be willing and able to attend all of the study visits, and to provide informed con- sent prior to screening.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Exclusion Criteria</title><p>Patients were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: previous ocular surgery; active ocular inflam- mation; or clinically diagnosed dry eye. Patients with hypersensitivity or poor tolerance to any components of the study medication; with bronchial asthma or history of bronchial asthma; with bronchial hyperreactivity or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that would preclude the safe administration of a topical beta- blocker; sinus bradycardia, second-degree or third-degree atrioventricular block, sinoatrial block, cardiac failure, or cardiogenic shock that would preclude the safe administration of a topical beta-blocker; or a severe medical or psychiatric disease were also excluded from the study.</p><p>This was a prospective, single center, open-labeled clinical trial. It was conducted between 01-01-2012 and 12-31-2012 at the Glaucoma Service of the Ophthalmological Department of Catholic University of Roma, Roma, ITALY, EU. Sixty patients (30 M, 30 F) were allocated using permuted-block randomization (block size = 3; allocation rate 1:1:1) into the following three groups: bimatoprost 0.03% + timolol 0.50% fixed combina- tion (BTFC) (Group A); timolol 0.50% (T) (Group B); or bimatoprost 0.01% (B) (Group C).</p><p>The clinical data collected included the patients’ demographic data (age and sex). In Group A, there were 10 males and 10 females and the mean age was 64.33, SD 12.03 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In Group B the sex rate was also 1:1, 10 males to 10 females and the mean age was 62.67, SD 7.367 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). In Group C, there was the same number of males and females (10 M, 10 F) and the mean age was 76.21, SD 8.251 years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). All of the patients underwent routine ophthalmological assessment prior to and after 6 and 12 months of treatment. The OSDI questionnaire was applied at each check time.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Student t-test was used to compare the age and pachymetrycal data of these groups. One-way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% was used to compare the continouous variables. The level of statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The results of the statistical analysis were unaffected by the demographic data (p = 0.079). All the patients in- cluded in this clinical trial ended it and nobody needed to change the hypotonising therapy. The OSDI scores were not statistically significant difference between Group A (BTFC) and B (T) patients (p = 0.845) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Instead, the OSDI scores were statistically significant different between Group C (B) and Group A (BTFC) pa- tients (p = 0.05) and between Group C (B) and Group B (T) patients (p = 0.049) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>) at time 12 months.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion and Conclusions</title><p>Strong evidence provided by previous clinical and experimental studies has indicated that the chronic use of an- tiglaucoma drugs might induce ocular surface changes, causing discomfort at instillation, conjunctival inflam- mation, tear film instability, subconjunctival fibrosis, apoptosis of conjunctival epithelial cells and corneal sur- face changes. These changes could result in a greater risk of failure when patients undergo antiglaucoma surgery, particularly trabeculectomy, as a result of postoperative fibrosis.</p><p>Several previous studies prove that changes in cell-to-cell contact result in a loss of “gap junctions” and in edema, which are reflected in the epithelial architecture and which lead to keratopathy. These pathological changes in the ocular surface could partly explain the occurrence of dry eye symptoms in patients using hypo- tensive drugs.</p><p>Some Authors reported that prolonged use (longer than six months) of 0.50% timolol maleate might lead to a</p><table-wrap id="table1"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 1</object-id><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>. Demographics of Group A</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >PATIENTS </th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AGE </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 M; 10 F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.33 y; 12.03 y SD </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 2</object-id><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>. Demographics of Group B</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >PATIENTS </th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AGE </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 M; 10 F </td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.67 y; 7.367 y SD </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 3</object-id><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>. Demographics of Group C</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >PATIENTS </th><th align="center" valign="middle" >AGE </th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 M; 10 F </td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.21 y; 8.251 y SD </td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legenda: M: males; F: females; SD: standard deviation; y: years.</p><table-wrap id="table4"  position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="pii">Table 4</object-id><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>. Results</p></caption><table><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >BTFC vs. T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p = 0.845</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B vs. BTFC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p = 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B vs. T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p = 0.049</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Legenda: BTFC: Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.50% Fixed Combination; T: Timolol 0.50%; B: Bimatoprost 0.01%.</p><p>higher incidence of dry eye, with lower break-up time (TBUT) values and Schirmer’s test scores. Several re- ports have also demonstrated that timolol could cause a decrease in the number of goblet cells and keratocon- junctivitis sicca. Reduction of TBUT values and Schirmer’s test scores have been described in many studies in- vestigating the effects of the length of glaucoma treatment, the number of medications used and preservative concentrations.</p><p>More recently, some authors, as we did, have used the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, a useful and economic tool, downloaded by web, for analyzing symptoms of dry eye, to measure symptoms in glauco- ma patients, not considering the visual field index [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.45872-ref14">14</xref>] . The lower the OSDI score is, the less toxic the medication is.</p><p>In summary, this study demonstrated that bimatoprost 0.01% is quite less toxic to the ocular surface after 12 months exposure than bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.50% fixed combination and timolol 0.50% eye drops alone.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Footnotes</title><p>The author declares to have no conflict of interest in any of the drug mentioned in this study.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.45872-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>RUSS</surname><given-names> H.H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> NOGUEIRA-FILHO</surname><given-names> P.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BARROS JDE</surname><given-names> N.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>OCULAR SURFACE EVALUATION IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH A FIXED COMBINATION OF PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOGUES WITH 0.5% TIMOLOL MALEATE TOPICAL MONOTHERAPY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL</article-title><source>. CLINICS (SAO PAULO)</source><volume> 68</volume>,<fpage> 1318</fpage>-<lpage>1324</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.6061/CLINICS/2013(10)05</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>NIXON</surname><given-names> D.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF BIMATOPROST 0.01% OR TRAVOPROST/TIMOLOL IN PATIENTS PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH LATANOPROST AND TIMOLOL TO REDUCE INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 876</fpage>-<lpage>881</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1089/JOP.2013.0108</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>PFENNIGSDORF</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> DE JONG</surname><given-names> L.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> MAKK</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF FIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES EVALUATING THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF BIMATOPROST/TIMOLOL FIXED COMBINATION IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA OR OCULAR HYPERTENSION</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 1219</fpage>-<lpage>1225</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.2147/OPTH.S41885</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>SHAFIEE</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> BOWMAN</surname><given-names> L.M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> HOU</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>OCULAR PHARMACOKINETICS OF BIMATOPROST FORMULATED IN DURASITE COMPARED TO BIMATOPROST 0.03% OPHTHALMIC SOLUTION IN PIGMENTED RABBIT EYES</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 1549</fpage>-<lpage>1556</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.2147/OPTH.S48766</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>CAMPBELL</surname><given-names> J.H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> SCHWARTZ</surname><given-names> G.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LABOUNTY</surname><given-names> B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>COMPARISON OF ADHERENCE AND PERSISTENCE WITH BIMATOPROST 0.01% VERSUS BIMATOPROST 0.03% TOPICAL OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS</article-title><source>. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 1201</fpage>-<lpage>1209</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1185/03007995.2013.815160</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>WONG</surname><given-names> W.B.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PATEL</surname><given-names> V.D.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KOWALSKI</surname><given-names> J.W.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>AN ADHERENCE BASED COST-CONSEQUENCE MODEL COMPARING BIMATOPROST 0.01% TO BIMATOPROST 0.03%</article-title><source>. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 1191</fpage>-<lpage>1200</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1185/03007995.2013.815159</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ALANY</surname><given-names> R.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>ADHERENCE, PERSISTENCE AND COST-CONSEQUENCE COMPARISON OF BIMATOPROST TOPICAL OCULAR FORMULATIONS</article-title><source>. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 1187</fpage>-<lpage>1189</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1185/03007995.2013.818968</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>STEWART</surname><given-names> W.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> KOLKER</surname><given-names> A.E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> STEWART</surname><given-names> J.A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2003</year>)<article-title>CONJUNCTIVAL HYPEREMIA IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AFTER SHORT-TERM DOSING WITH LATANOPROST, BIMATOPROST, AND TRAVOPROST</article-title><source>. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 135</volume>,<fpage> 314</fpage>-<lpage>320</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01980-3</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>JOHNSTONE</surname><given-names> M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (1997)<article-title>HYPERTRICHOSIS AND INCREASED PIGMENTATION OF EYELASHES AND ADJACENT HAIR IN THE REGION OF THE IPSILATERAL EYELIDS OF PATIENTS TREATED WITH UNILATERAL TOPICAL LATANOPROST</article-title><source>. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 124</volume>,<fpage> 544</fpage>-<lpage>547</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>KOOK</surname><given-names> M.S. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> LEE</surname><given-names> K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>INCREASED EYELID PIGMENTATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF LATANOPROST</article-title><source>. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 129</volume>,<fpage> 804</fpage>-<lpage>806</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00402-5</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>HERRERAS</surname><given-names> J.M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> PASTOR</surname><given-names> J.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CALONGE</surname><given-names> M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>OCULAR SURFACE ALTERATION AFTER LONG-TERM TREATMENT WITH ANTIGLAUCOMATOUS DRUG</article-title><source>. OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 99</volume>,<fpage> 1082</fpage>-<lpage>1088</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/S0161-6420(92)31847-0</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>NUZZI</surname><given-names> R.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> FINAZZO</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> CERRUTI</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TOPICAL ANTIGLAUCOMATOUS MEDICATIONS ON THE CONJUNCTIVA AND THE LACRYMAL</article-title><source>. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 31</fpage>-<lpage>35</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1023/A:1006051725115</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>BROADWAY</surname><given-names> D.C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> GRIERSON</surname><given-names> I.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> O’BRIEN</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TOPICAL ANTIGLAUCOMA MEDICATION. THE CONJUNCTIVAL CELL PROFILE</article-title><source>. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 112</volume>,<fpage> 1437</fpage>-<lpage>1445</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1001/ARCHOPHT.1994.01090230051020</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.45872-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ARICI</surname><given-names> M.K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ARICI</surname><given-names> D.S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> TOPALKARA</surname><given-names> A.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> ET AL. </surname><given-names>  </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2000</year>)<article-title>ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TOPICAL ANTIGLAUCOMA DRUGS ON THE OCULAR SURFACE</article-title><source>. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL &amp; EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY</source><volume> 28</volume>,<fpage> 113</fpage>-<lpage>117</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1046/J.1442-9071.2000.00237.X</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>