1. Introduction

Applied Mathematics

2152-7385

Scientific Research Publishing

10.4236/am.2014.510143

AM-46524

Articles

COMPUTER SCIENCE & COMMUNICATIONSENGINEERINGPHYSICS & MATHEMATICS

A Pure Mathematical Relationship between Pitch and Position for Stringed Instruments

Nan

Yang

¹^*Dawei

Zhang

²Yanling

Tian

School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China

School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China;Tianjin Key Laboratory for Control Theory & Applications in Complicated Systems, Tianjin, China;School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, China

* E-mail:y79nzw@163.com(NY);

22052014

05101503150724 April 201424 April 2014 1 May 2014

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

In this paper, a simple mathematical model was proposed to answer such a question: what’s the relationship between the finger pressing position and the corresponding pitch for stringed instruments? Furthermore, we compared the theoretical results with measurement results which were obtained from a guitar to prove that the model we propose is reliable. Result shows that relative errors of theoretical results and measurement results are from 0.18% to 1.8%. The mathematics model is more concise, direct and clear than physical model.

Stringed Instrument Fret Pitch Mathematical Model

1. Introduction

Stringed instrument with frets is a big member in the stringed instrument family. In the west, we have guitar and mandolin, in China, Pipa, Liuqin and Ruan, in India, Sitar. It seems that, in the whole world, all the appearances of these stringed instruments are similar: the frets are not uniform distributed, whereas interval of adjacent frets decreases close to the plucking region. How about the frets distributed in mathematic?

Pure mathematical model is rare to be found, people tend to study the stringed instruments physically and acoustically as [1] -[4] . But this is so complex that only people who have relevant knowledge can understand well. So, in this paper, we proposed a novel point of view which is only based on the general musical knowledge and performing experiences.

2. Math Model

Right hand plays in the plucking region (in Figure 1), at the same time, left hand finger presses the string to touch a fret at , then make a sound of pitch p, where p is the order number of corresponding pitch, as shown in Table 1, the pitch interval of each adjoining fret is half tone. The string strides over OZ, and pitch p rises from point O to Z, where OZ denotes the length of the entire string, OZ is a constant, d is the distance between the string and frets, which could be neglected. The pitch-position function is the main task in this paper.

2.1. Basic Principles and Hypothesizes2.1.1. Continuity Distribution of Pitch

The whole string is full of pitches just as the real number axis is full of real number. So, the principle could extend to stringed instruments without frets, such as violin and cello. The pitches in one octave are listed as Table 1 (take E string of guitar for example).

There are 13 pitches (labeled from 0 to 12) in one octave on E string of guitar. Pitch name is a musical name. According to 2.1.1, there are infinite pitch notes between “E” and “F”, “F” and “^#F”, and so on.

2.1.2. Boundary Conditions

The pitch of the string played without left hand is called “free string”. When the left hand finger presses in the middle of the string, the pitch is one octave higher than free string. So, we can get two boundary conditions:

(1)

(2)

2.1.3. Equal Ratio Hypothesize

For two tight strings of different length (see Figure 2), let free string pitches of string 1 and string 2 are respectively and, pitches of finger pressing points are respective and, pressing positions are respective and. This hypothesize is based on the performing experiences, that is, if, then.

Figure 1

A string OZ and frets

Figure 2

Two strings of different length

Table 1

. Pitch and its order number

Pitch name	E	F	^#F	G	^bA	A	^bB	B	C	^bD	D	^bE	E
p	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12

2.1.4. Key Position Hypothesize

The finger pressing position close to the plucking region determines the pitch. For example, in Figure 1, when a finger presses string at, the pitch played by right hand does not change whether is pressed or not, because the string vibration part is. Distance between string and fret could be neglected as d = 0.

2.2. Differential Equation

The pitches of three adjoining points P, Q, R are respectively, , , in Figure 3, and their positions are respectively, ,. Based on 2.1.3, we get, i.e.:

(3)

The deducting process is:

So, we have:

Let, so:

(4)

Fortunately, we can get the accurate solution according to (1), (2), (4):

(5)

where denotes the ratio:.

And interval of fret could be expressed as:

(6)

where r(p) and Dr(p) are respect the fret ratio-position and ratio-interval of the whole string.

Interestingly, based on Equation (5) and Equation (6), if, then and, which conforms to general knowledge.

Figure 3

Fret positions of three arithmetic progression pitches

3. Results

A real guitar is measured to get measurement results. Results of Equation (5) and Equation (6) are compared with measurement results, which are presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5 respectively, and the relative error is shown in Table 2. Where r₁(p) is average value of twice measurements; the relative error is computed by.

4. Conclusion

What’s the mathematical relationship between pitch and position for stringed instruments? We answer this

Figure 4

Comparison of measurement result and theoretical result. The curve is theoretical result of Equation (5). If, then. The red points are measurement results of 20 frets of a real guitar

Figure 5

The ratio-interval of adjacent frets. The curve is the theoretical result of Equation (6).,

Table 2

. Theoretical result and measurement result

p	0	1	2	3	4	5	6
r (p)	0	0.05613	0.10910	0.15910	0.20630	0.25085	0.29289
r₁ (p)	0	0.05717	0.11056	0.16079	0.20731	0.25206	0.29411
Error (%)	0	1.8	1.3	1.05	0.48	0.48	0.41
p	7	8	9	10	11	12	13
r (p)	0.33258	0.37004	0.40540	0.43877	0.47027	0.50000	0.52806
r₁ (p)	0.33431	0.37111	0.40637	0.43994	0.47141	0.50135	0.52920
Error (%)	0.52	0.29	0.23	0.27	0.24	0.27	0.22
p	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
r (p)	0.55455	0.57955	0.60315	0.62542	0.64645	0.66629	0.68502
r₁ (p)	0.55559	0.58059	0.60433	0.62703	0.64848	0.66824	0.68675
Error (%)	0.19	0.18	0.21	0.26	0.31	0.29	0.25

question in this paper. The mathematical model is simple, direct and meaningful, only based on the general music knowledge and performing experiences. Measuring the pitch-position data from a guitar, the calculated values agree with the measurement values so well.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by China Post-doctor Foundation No. 2012M520572, Tianjin Municipal Education Commission Grant No. 20120401 and Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission Key Grant (2014).

References1

GUETTLER

, THELIN

,et al. (2012)BOWED-STRING MULTIPHONICS ANALYZED BY USE OF IMPULSE RESPONSE AND THE POISSON SUMMATION FORMULA THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 131, 766-772.HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1121/1.3651251

FIORAVANTI

, GOLI

, CARLSON

,et al. (2012)STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT AND MEASUREMENT OF THE ELASTIC DEFORMATION OF HISTORICAL VIOLINS: THE CASE STUDY OF THE GUARNERI “DEL GESU” VIOLIN (1743) KNOWN AS THE “CANNONE” JOURNAL OF CULTURAL HERITAGE 13, 145-153.HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1016/J.CULHER.2011.07.005

CHIN

S.H.L.

, BERGER

,et al. (2010)ANALYSIS OF PITCH PERCEPTION OF INHARMONICITY IN PIPA STRINGS USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY JOURNAL OF NEW MUSIC RESEARCH 39, 63-73.HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1080/09298210903477260

WONG

A.K.K.

, LEUNG

S.H.

, LAU

W.H.

,et al. (1999)DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A REAL-TIME DIGITAL RESONATOR FOR THE ELECTRIC CELLO COMPUTER MUSIC JOURNAL 23, 48-58.HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1162/014892699559995