Getting Pregnant after Infertility Management without Assisted Reproductive Technology in a Low-Income Setting

Getting pregnant after infertility management is a more challenging situation in some under equipped sub-Saharan setting. To highlight the determinants of conception without Assisted Reproductive technology (ART) in a low- income area. The current study concerned 2958 patients who sought care for infertility in the University Clinic of Kinshasa et the Centre Medical Edith, from January 2003 to December 2013. For them, any technique of ART was used. Age of patients ranged from 18 to 49 with average of 33.2 ± 5.6 years old. After treatment , 249 (9%) patients conceived (clinical pregnancy). Most of the patients who conceived were less than 36 years, without history of illegal abortions et who suffered from genital infections. The treatments closely associated with conception were antibiotics (73%), hydrotubation (12%) ovulation inductors (11%) and gynecologic surgery (4%). In that setting, ART is a must . Very few infertility problems, apart from infection and its conse quences, can get solution.

• Infertility Management
• Sub-Saharan Area
• ART
• Tubal Infertility

1. Introduction

Getting pregnant after infertility management is a more challenging situation in some under equipped sub-Saharan area. In spite of the high prevalence of infertility (25% - 30%), relevant care, represented by Assisted Reproductive techniques (ART) are not only generally unavailable, but more expensive in most of those settings where they are implemented [1] [2] . Resorting to former attitudes without ART is then the rule.

Couple infertility, defined as the failure to conceive after at least a year of regular and complete intercourse without any contraception, is a worldwide public health problem [3] [4] [5] ; especially in sub Saharan setting [6] . The tuboperitoneal lesions from infectious origin constitute the main cause of infertility [7] . That region is among pronatalists areas where infertility is a source of social dramatic consequences like: stigmatization, reject, divorce, polygamy and depression [8] [9] . Belonging to a strong growth demographic region, secondary infertility is the most prevalent. Indeed, with a high desire to procreate, there is less attention to use contraceptive method, like barrier, that prevent also from sexual transmitted infection (STI) [10] .

The STI with postpartum infection are the main cause of tubal infertility by tubal occlusion among with, peritoneal and peritubo ovarian adhesions. Assisted Reproductive Techniques (ART) constitutes the relevant way to take care of those patients. Unfortunately, they are unavailable in some sub-Saharan areas because of the difficulties to acquire equipment; and the way many government’s decision makers perceive the problem of infertility [2] [11] . According to WHO, the Reproductive health is a complete well being of people concerning genital apparatus: its function and its functionality, not only the absence of disease. That definition takes in account, couple infertility and its consequences [12] . Unfortunately, in many sub-Saharan countries, Reproductive health is reduced to contraception methods. So, organizing facilities to take care of infertility is considered as spending money for free. In the other hand, ARTs are so expensive (cost of ovulation inductors and investigations) that few can afford that by themselves [11] . In that situation many medical institutions providing infertility care don’t dispose of ART facilities.

Until 2013, more than 450 ART centers were available in USA, with 12,000 dollars for one tentative; supported by the patient; in France, 106 centers with 2500$ a tentative, supported by social security facilities [13] [14] [15] . In Africa continent, few centers providing ART were available [16] [17] : three in Kenya and one in DRC, where cares are supported by the patients themselves. Consequently, many infertile patients were treated without using ARTs.

The aim of the current study is to highlight the determinants of conception in a program of infertility management out of ARTs, in a low-income setting.

2. Material and Methods

It was a case-control study that took place from January 2003 to December 2013, in the University Clinic of Kinshasa (infertility unit) and the Centre Medical Edith (whose main activity is infertility care). The two facilities used the same infertility management protocols. A total of 2958 patients, who were managed without any ART (Intra uterine insemination, in vitro fertilization and Intracytoplasmic sperm injection), were enrolled. Among them, only 2913, who were followed during at least six months, were included in the current study and 45 were excluded because of the incompleteness of their files, genital tract malformations and age above 49 years old. They were divided into two groups: the case group was made of patients who conceived after investigations and treatment; the control group by the ones who did not conceive.

Their management was systematically made of: anamnesis (the main complaint and medical history), physical examination, Para clinical investigations: hysterosalpingography (HSG), endometrial biopsy (using Novak canula), postcoïtal test (PCT), and spermogram; after that, some further investigations were made, according to the previous findings. Hence a diagnosis has been made and a relevant treatment was applied: medical treatment (specially Antibiotics, ovulation inductors), surgery (specially myomectomy, intrauterine synechiae lysis, adhesiolysis, salpingostomy and fimbryiolysis).

The variables of interest were demographics: the age of the patient and her partner, parity, history of abortion, duration of infertility (period from maternity desire to the day of consultation); medical, obstetrical and surgery histories (mainly abdomino-pelvic surgeries); marital status (free union, monogamic or polygamic), clinic: BMI and Para clinic findings: Hysterosalpingography, endometrial biopsy (novak canula), Post coïtal test and spermogram. Given that the main etiologies of infertility are of tubal origin in sub Saharan area, HSG is the key test to be considered that the patient was well investigated para clinically in the current study. To stay in the level of infertility management of that period, in most of the centers in that setting, the laparoscopic and hysteroscopy findings were not taken in account. Several years ago, endometrial biopsy and post coital test were counted among our usual infertility workup. Endometrial biopsy at mi-luteal phase to check the functional aspect of the secretory phase (concordance between the day of the cycle and the endometrium aspect) and the organic lesion of endometrium (specific and non-specific endometritis, bone metaplasia). The PCT was used to assess, under the high-power objective, the presence of sperm; their number and their motility in contact with cervical mucus. It was considered positive when at least 5 sperms were observed per one high power field of microscope, and negative in the absence of sperm, or the presence of less than 5 motile sperms or immotile sperm. Because of male partner reticence to be examined, only the ones with negative PCT were selected for spermogram, in the current study. We considered as pauciparous, the patients who delivered two or three viable fetus (≥28 weeks of gestational age) and multiparous, above three. For the BMI (weight per height in square meter), patients were categorized according to the WHO classification [18] .

Data were extracted, respectively from the database of University clinic infertility unit and the Centre Médical Edith and recorded in an MS access database; missing informations were completed from patients’ files. The Stata IC 15.1 program analyzed the data. Quantitative variables were summarized as mean and standard deviation; qualitative variables as proportion. The Pearson Khi2 test was used for proportions comparison; the t Student test for means comparison and logistic regression to appreciate the strength of association between variables. The significative difference level was set at p = 0.05.

The current study had received the approval of the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of Kinshasa University clinic board.

There was no conflict of interest in the current study.

3. Results

1) General patients’ characteristics

The mean age of patients was 33.2 ± 5.6 years and ranged from 18 to 49 years old. Most of them (34.3%) were above 35 years, followed by those between 31 to 35 (32.1%). The mean age of menarche was 13.8 ± 1.8 years ranging from 8 to 22 years. The majority of patients were nulliparous (62.9%), three percent (2.8%) were multiparous and two third (65.6%) had secondary infertility. Forty percent of the patients had a history of at least one illegal abortion. Almost all of them (97.4%) were married.

The male partners mean age was 40.3 ± 6.3 years old with the extreme of 24 and 74 years. The majority of them (51.7%) were between 31 and 40 years old. Mean infertility duration was 4.3 ± 3.7 years with a quarter (26.6 %) having consulted after 5 years of infertility. Forty-one percent had a history of previous abdomno pelvic surgery, among them appendicectomy (13%) and myomectomy (8.9%) were the most frequent. Most of patients were overweight (39.6%) and a fifth (20.1%) frankly obese.

After first visit and preliminary investigations, genital infection (low and high genital infection) was the most frequent main diagnosis (46.7%) followed by uterus myoma (21.9%).

At hysterosalpingography (for 1219 patients) almost a half (46.5%) had tubal occlusion with 33.5% bilateral occlusion. The endometrial biopsy revealed 43 (5.04%) patients with endometritis; among them 38 cases (88.3%) of nonspecific endometritis and 2 (4.6%) of tuberculosis endometritis. Among the 647 spermograms, 75% were abnormal (52% oligoasthenozoospermia, 18% oligozoospermia; 4% azoospermia and 1% oligoasthenoteratozoospermia). According to the diagnosis, different treatments were applied.

2) Conception among those patients

From the 2913 patients who attending infertility clinic, 249 conceived (9%). To consider the treatment immediately followed by conception, we had antibiotics in 73% patients, ovulation inductors in 11%, the actually abandoned hydrotubation in 12% and surgery in 4% (Figure 1).

Mean age of the case group was lesser (31.3 ± 5.0 years) than the control (33.4 ± 5.6 years) (p = 0.000). Furthermore, the case group partners mean age was lesser (37.8 ± 5.7 years) than the controls partners (40.5 ± 6.0) (p = 0.000). According to Table 1, below 36 years, 11% of patients conceived vs 4.2% above (p = 0.000). There was no difference (p = 0.5) between the rate of conception between primary infertility patients (9.3%) compared to secondary (8.6%). Illegal

Table 1

Patients’ characteristics and conception

	Total N	Without conception n	Conception n	%	p
AGE (years)	2889	2640	249
≤25	240	213	27	11.3
26 - 30	729	646	83	11.4	0.000
31 - 35	928	831	97	10.4
>35	992	950	42	4.2
Average		33.4 ± 5.6	31.3 ± 5		0.000
TYPE OF INFERTILITY	2739	2496	243
I	942	854	88	9.3	0.499
II	1797	1642	155	8.6
ILLEGAL ABORTION	1804	1597	207
0	1089	939	150	14
1 - 2	595	544	51	8.6	0.000
≥3	120	114	6	5
Marital STATUS	2713	2477	236
Married	2642	2408	234	8.9	0.075
Single	71	69	2	2.8
INFERTILITY DURATION (years)	1468	1277	191
1	297	233	64	21.6
2	299	250	49	16	0.000
3 - 5	482	431	51	10.6
>5	390	363	27	7
ABDOMINO PELVIC SURGERY HISTORY	2908	2659	249
No history	1718	1554	164	9.5
Appendicectomy	378	340	38	10.1
kystectomy	93	89	4	4.3
Myomectomy	261	246	15	5.7	0.150
kystectomy & appendicectomy	148	138	10	6.8
Ceasarian	44	40	4	9.1
Ectopic pregnancy	38	37	1	2.6
Adhesiolysis & stomatoplasty	10	10	0	0
Peritonitis	11	10	1	9
Others	207	195	12	5.8
BODY MASS INDEX	920	777	143
<18.5	23	19	4	17.3

18.5 - 24.9	345	271	74	21.4	0.001
25 – 29.9	366	321	45	12.3
≥30	186	166	20	10.8
C		26.73 ± 5.15	25.25 ± 4.3	0.001
DIAGNOSIS	1122	1122	149
Genital infection	524	468	56	10.7
Myoma	246	229	17	6.9
Ovarian dystrophy (SOMPK)	96	79	17	17.7	0.000
Hyperprolactinemia	70	53	18	24.3
Uterine synechia	34	30	4	11.8
No diagnosis	152	115	37	24.3
HSG	1219	1083	136
Normal	439	381	58	13.2
BTO	408	359	49	12	0.073
UTO	158	143	15	9.5
Adhesions, adenomyosis	214	200	14	6.5
Endometrial biopsy	854	854
Normal	162	139	23	14.1
Functional abnormalities	649	577	72	11.1	0.369
Endometritis	43	36	7	16.2
SPERMOGRAM	647	647
Normal	161	137	24	14.9
oligozoospermia	115	105	10	8.7	0.059
oligoasthenozoospermia	334	284	50	15
Oligoasthenotheratozoospemia	9	9	0	0
Azoospermia	28	28	0	0
LEUCOSPERMIA	647	647
sperm with leucospermia	315	267	48	15.2	0.096
sperm Without leucospermia	332	296	36	10.8

Legend: N = total number of patients; n = number of patients who conceived; % = their percentage. Infertility I = primary; II: secondary.

abortion was more (p = 0.000) frequent (41.2%) among the controls than the cases (27.54%). The conception frequency decreased with the number of illegal abortion (p = 0.000): from 14% for patients without history of illegal abortion to 5% for the ones with more two abortion (Table 2).

Almost all the patients were married (99.15% vs 97.21%); no difference between married and singles for conception rate (p = 0.075). The percentage of the patients who conceived decreased steadily (p = 0.000) with the infertility duration:

Table 2

Conception determinants in univariate analysis

Variables	OR	SE	p	IC 95%
Age of patients (years)
≤25	2.867	0.739	0.000	1.729 - 4.754
26 - 30	2.906	0.569	0.000	1.978 - 4.268
31 - 35	2.640	0.503	0.000	1.816 - 3.836
>35	1
Type of infertility
Infer II	0.909	0.127	0.499	0.691 - 1.197
Infer I	1
Illegal abortion
1 - 2	0.586	0.100	0.002	0.419 - 0.820
≥3	0.329	0.141	0.009	0.142 - 0.762
none	1
Partner age (years)
≤30	1.714	0809	0,254	0.679 - 4.324
31 - 40	2.002	0714	0,052	0.995 - 4.029
41 - 50	0.578	0222	0,155	0.272 - 1.230
>50	1
18.5 - 24.9	0.525	0.331	0.307	0.152 - 1.808
25 - 29.9	0.520	0.107	0.002	0.347 - 0.779
≥30	0.442	0.119	0.003	0.260 - 0.752
<18.5	1
Diagnosis
Genital infection	1.829	0.758	0.146	0.810 - 4.125
Myoma	1.134	0.526	0.785	0.456 - 2.810
Ovarian Dystrophy	3.289	1.555	0.012	1.301 - 8.311
Hyperprolactinemia	4.902	2.350	0.001	1.915 - 12.548
Synechia	2.038	1.345	0.281	0.559 - 7.429
Menopausis	Omitted
Cycle desorders	3.668	2.197	0.030	1.133 - 11.869
Others	1
HSG
BTO	0.814	0.172	0.332	0.537 - 1.233
UTO	0.689	0.210	0.223	0.378 - 1.254
Others	0.459	0.142	0.012	0.250 - 0.844
Normal	1
Endometrial biopsy
Functional abnormalies	0.754	0.194	0.273	0.455 - 1.249

Endometritis	1.175	0.552	0.732	0.467 - 2.954
Normal	1
Spermogram
Oligospermia	0.543	0.216	0.126	0.249 - 1.186
Oligoasthenozoospermia	1.004	0.270	0.985	0.592 - 1.703
OAT	Omitted
Azoospermia	Omitted
Normal	1
Duration of infertility (years)
1	3.692	0.902	0.000	2.287 - 5.961
2	2.571	0.653	0.000	1.562 - 4.231
3 - 5	1.590	0.395	0.062	0.977 - 2.588
>5	1

Legend: OAT = oligoasthenozoospermia; BTO = Bilateral tubal occlusion; UTO = Unilateral tubal occlusion; Others = synechiae, spicules.

21.5% after a year; 16% after two years and 7% after 5 years).

A third of the two groups (34.2% and 39.6%) had a history of abdomino-pelvic surgery, with appendicectomy as the most frequent (13%). There was no difference (p = 0.150) between the surgeries indication and the conception rate.

The mean BMI of the case group (25.23 ± 4.3) was less (p = 0.0014) than controls’ (26.73 ± 5.18). Obesity was more frequent (21.28% vs 13.92%) among controls (p = 0.0014) than case group. In comparison with the normoweighted group; the rate of conception was low in thinness category and decreased with the BMI above 30 kg/m² (0.001). Genital infection, after physical examination and first line investigations, was the main diagnosis (22.67% vs 17.68%) but more frequent among the ones who conceived (0.000); and myoma more frequent in control group (8.66% VS 6.88%) (p = 0.000). According to Table 2, there was no difference between case group and control regarding HSG (p = 0.073) and endometrial biopsy (p = 0.059) findings for conception. The majority patients (44.45% vs 46.5% had any tubal occlusion (bilateral tubal occlusion: 34.39% vs 33.39%). A tenth (12%) of patients with BTO conceived. Among the patients with endometritis, sixteen percent conceived after treatment.

3) Determinants of Conception

The variables significantly associated with conception were the age of patients and of their partners, BMI and the number of illegal abortions.

Patients of less than 36 years old had three times more chance to conceive than the ones above; especially for those of 25 - 30 years cluster (OR = 2.9; 95% IC: 1.978 - 4.286). Overweight and obesity were associated with the reduction of the chance of conception in comparison to the thinness (p = 0.002 and p = 0.03). The chance of conception decreased with the number of illegal abortions: a history of 1 to 2 abortion reduced the chance of conception of 42% (p = 0.002) and 70% (p = 0.009) from 3 abortions. Patients whose male partners was less than 41 years old had twice more chance to conceive compared to those whose partners had more than 40 years old; this association was at the edge of significance (p = 0.052).

The chance to conceive decreased with the duration of infertility: one year, two and 3 to 5 years clusters were associated with respectively four, three and two times more chance to conceive than the ones above 5 years (p = 0.000). Patients with tubo-peritoneal lesions at HSG had the chance of conception decreased of 20% for BTO; 30% for UTO and 55% for others (deformation of uterine cavity, adenomyosis) compared with those without.

In multivariate analysis (Table 3), the age of patients, the BMI remained significantly (p = 0.017 and 0.028) associated with conception. In comparison with those of more than 35 years, patients of less than 25 and 31 - 35 clusters had respectively 24 and 6 times more chance to conceive (p = 0.017 and 0.028). The chance of conception was reduced by 95% for overweight patients (p = 0.033) than the thins.

4. Discussion

1) General Patients Characteristics

The average age of the patients was 33.2 ± 5.6 years raging from 18 to 49. That was close to our findings in 2011: 33.7 ± 5.2 years old [19] . In the contrary, that mean age was superior to the ones, found by our team 15 years before [20] , by Cissé et al., 1997 [21] and Moreira, 2008 in Senegal [17] respectively: 29.5; 26 and 28 years. That observation is consistent with Belaish et al., 2009 who noticed the increase of age at first motherhood year by year, in the world. Many women get married more and more later [22] . Furthermore, the high rate of illegal abortions among patients (40%) pleads for great sexual activity meanwhile, without contraception barrier, that constituted a risk factor for sexual transmitted infection and its consequence leading to tubal infertility.

Table 3

Conception determinants in multivariate analysis

Variables	OR	SE	p	IC 95%
Age of patientes (years)
<25	24.350	32.577	0.017	1.768 - 335.203
26 - 30	1.731	1.616	0.556	0.278 - 10.786
31 - 35	5.935	4.802	0.028	1.215 - 28.984
>35	1
Type of infertility
Infer II	1.952	1.233	0.290	0.565 - 6.738
Infer I	1
Illegal abortions
1 - 2	1.460	1.169	0.636	0.303 - 7.014
≥3	1 (omitted)
None	1
BMI (Kg/m2)
18.5 - 24.9	0.108	0.139	0.085	0.008 - 1.353
25 - 29.9	0.057	0.077	0.033	0.004 - 0.795
≥30	0.308	0.421	0.389	0.021 - 4.485
<18.5	1
Endometrial biopsy
Functional abnormalies	0.437	0.333	0.278	0.982 - 1.948
Endometritis	11.837	19.932	0.142	0.436 - 321.057
Normal	1
Spermogram
Oligospermia	0.970	0.908	0.974	0.154 - 6.084
Oligoasthenozoospermia	0.521	0.355	0.339	0.137 - 1.979
OAT	1 (omitted)
Azoospermia	1 (omitted)
Normal	1
Infertility duration (years)
1	1.951	1.777	0.463	0.327 - 11.627
2	1.736	1.490	0.520	0.322 - 9.337
3 - 5	1.416	1.127	0.662	0.297 - 6.737
>5	1
HSG
BTO	0.406	0.274	0.183	0.108 - 1.528
UTO	3.656	3.551	0.182	0.544 - 24.537
Others	0.112	0.123	0.046	0.013 - 0.965
Normal	1

The mean duration of infertility was ranged from 1 to 25 Years with an average of 4.3 ± 3.7 years, comparable to our findings in 2011 [19] and Stacey in USA among blacks patients and Hispanics in comparison with white American and those of Chinese origin [23] . The long duration of infertility could be explained not only by ignorance and poverty, but mostly by the patients’ itinerary. They go for alternative medecine (traditional medicine providers) first before relying on western medicine [19] .

2) Conception after Management

Nine percent of infertile patients conceived (clinical pregnancy). Considering only the patients who persevered to the beginning of paraclinical investigation (HSG), (1219 patients), the conception rate climbed to 11.09%. In comparison to Western ARTs centers results, that rate is, naturally very low [11] . No conception occurred in patients, whose partners were azoospermia or with OAT and the ones with history of tubal reparative surgery.

The mean age of the conception group (31.3 ± 5.7 years) was significantly (p = 0.000) lower than controls (33.4 ± 5.6 years). Conception rate was 11% in group of patients less than 36 years old and 4% above. Considering the association between conception and predictors, the patients less than 36 years old had three times more chance to conceive than those above (p = 0.000). Noticed in univariate analysis, that association persisted in the multivariate analysis. Adjusted with other predictors effects, patients of less than 25 years old had 24 times more chance to conceive than those above 35 years old (p = 0.017). That is consistent with the progressive decrease of female fertility from age of 30 according to Broeckmans et al., 2007 curve [24] . This is mainly explained by ovarian ageing and the occurrence of pathologies related to female ageing, like myomas and endometriosis [25] . And we have to take in account, the high risk of tubal infertility due to risky sexual behavior (STI and VIH) of patients before maternity desire, illustrated by a high rate of illegal abortion.

The rate of conception declined significantly (p = 0.000) with the duration of infertility: 21.5% for patients with one year and 6.9% for patients of more than 5 years. Furthermore, patients seeking infertility care after one, two and 3 - 5 years clusters had respectively 4, 3 and 2 times more chance to conceive in comparison with those who consulted more later (p = 0.000 and p = 0.062). That decreasing of the chance of conception is consistent with the decrease of fecundability according to the duration of fertility as stated by Schwartz [26] . Indeed, if the fecundability is around 25% at the beginning [24] , it falls by 16% after 6 months, 8% after 2 years and 4% after 5 years. That could be explained by the fact that longer is the duration of infertility, more likely the patients are aged. According to previous study in France, 44% of infertile women aged more than 40 years had more than six years of infertility. In addition, female and male gametes alterations and the reduction of intercourse frequency by ageing reduce the chance of conception per cycle [27] .

The mean age of the partners case (37.8 ± 5.7 years) was significantly lesser (p = 0.000) than the controls (40.5 ± 6.0 years). The patients whose male partners were lesser than 41 years old had three times more chance to conceive than the elder ones (p = 0.05). That situation can be explained by the decrease of the sperm quality with the age, because of the alteration of spermatogenesis and vascularization related to testicular ageing. It is reported the decrease of Leidig cell number with reduction of testosterone production and increase of tissue fibrosis [28] .

In the USA, Fisch et al., 1996 noticed the reduction of sperm motility of 0.17% from the age of 30 years [29] . Furthermore, Anger et al., 1995 noticed the decrease of sperm motility of 0.6% to 12% and the increase of sperm abnormal form, from 0.9% to 18% between 30 to 50 years [30] .

The majority (51.7%) of the patients who conceived were norm weighted, a few (13.9%) were obese and underweighted (2.8%). Compared to underweighted patients, the chance of conception decreased by 50% (p = 0.002) for overweighed and 60% (p = 0.003) for obese. Furthermore, adjusted to other factors, overweight reduced the chance of conception by 95% (p = 0.033) compared to underweighted patients. Age of the patients seemed to explain partially that observation. Indeed, 75% of underweighted patients were younger than the overweighed and obese, who were older than 35 years. Gensik et al., 2007 [31] and Brewer et al., 2010 [32] in USA, noticed the reduction of the chance of conception by 18% among over weighted and obese patients in comparison with the norm weighted (OR = 0.92 and 0.82).

A tenth (11.03%) of patients with bilateral tubal occlusion conceived after treatment. In the current study, the main treatment of tubal occlusion was hydrotubation, which was also a treatment associated with conception. The occurring of conception in this situation poses also the problem of the validity of HSG findings compared to the laparoscopic ones [33] Indeed, in all studies related to this aspect it was noticed that HSG was more specific than sensible, with a high rate of false positive results [33] .

No conception had been noticed among couple whose male partner had OAT and azoospermia; situations that can be resolved quasi exclusively by ART [34] .

Among the patients who conceived, 37.5% had genital infection as main diagnosis followed by the ones without any diagnosis (24.8%), and there were 12% with hyperprolactinemia and 11.4% each with myoma and ovarian dystrophy.

Genital infection was the most frequent diagnosis for all patients (46.4%). Furthermore, almost half of partner spermogram had leucocytospermia (46.4%) and the majority (52.84%) had other spermogram abnormalities associated with leucocytospermia, the best stigma of infection. It is well known that infection and its consequences (tubo-peritoneal, ovarian dysfonction) were the main responsible of infertility in subsaharan setting [7] .

Antibiotherapy was the most frequent treatment immediately associated with conception apart from some conception that occurred after some old fashioned techniques like hydrotubation.

The limit of the current study is its retrospective design, that could not allow to explore some predictors; Despite this weakness, in the other hand its strength is the huge number of patients.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, to take care of infertile couple out of ART, the conception is more likely to occur in patients aged less than 36 years, with infertility duration less than 3 years, normal weighted, without history of illegal abortion and tubal surgery, suffering from genital infection; a partner of less than 41 years old, without OAT and azoospermia. The main treatment closely related to conception was antibiotics, followed by hydrotubation and ovarian induction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

1. Nana, P.N., Wandji, J.C., Rfornulu, J.N., Mbu, R.E., Leke, R.J.I. and Woubibwou, J.M. (2011) Aspect psycho-sociaux chez les patientes infertiles à la Maternité Principale de l’Hopital Central de Yaoundé. Clinics in Mother and Child Health, 8, C100601. https://doi.org/10.4303/cmch/C100601

2. Okonofua, F.E. (1996) The Case against New Reproductive Technologies in Developing Countries. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 103, 957-962. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09542.x

3. World Health Organization (2004) Infecundity, Infertility and the Childlessness in Developing Countries. Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Comparative Report No. 9. WHO, Geneva, 74.

4. Boivin, J., Bunting, L., Collins, J.A. and Nygren, K.G. (2007) International Estimates of Infertility Prevalence and Treatment-Seeking: Potential Need and Demand for Infertility Medical Care. Human Reproduction, 22, 1506-1512. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem046

5. Fathalla, M.F. (1992) Reproductive Health: A Global Overview. Early Human Development, 29, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3782(92)90055-L

6. Ombelet, W., Cooke, I., Dyer, S., Serour, G. and Devroey, P. (2008) Infertility and the Provision of Infertility Medical Services in Developing Countries. Human Reproduction, 14, 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmn042

7. Gwet Bell, E. (2013) Traitement médical de la femme infertile en Afrique. Reproduction Humaine et Hormones, 3-4, 50-58.

8. World Health Organization. Global Prevalence of Infertility, Infecundity and Childlessness. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/burden/en

9. Mahmoud, A. L’infertilité au Maghreb: Aspect Statistiques. http://www.3cetudes.com/news/Infertilite au Maghreb aspect statistique.pdf

10. Nachtigall, R.D. (2006) International Disparities in Access to Infertility Services. Fertility and Sterility, 85, 871-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.066

11. Mayenga, J.M. (2013) Quelle technique d’assistance médicale à la procréation pour l’Afrique? Reproduction Humaine et Hormones, 3-4, 96-103.

12. United Nations (1995) Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, Egypt, 5-13 September 1994. United Nation Population Fund, New York, E. 95. XIII. 18.

13. Howard, W.J., Cooke, I., Kempers, R., Brinsden, P. and Sauders, D. (2010) International Federation of Fertility Societies IFFS Surveillance.

14. L’aide Médicale à la Procréation. http://www.chu-tours.fr/site_public/infos_sante/amp.html

15. Horde, P. Connaitre le taux de réussite des FIV dans les centres de PMA. http://www.Santé-Médecine.net, 2003-12-4.

16. Murage, A., Muteshi, M.C. and Githae, F. (2011) Assisted Reproduction Services Provision in a Developing Country: Time to Act? Fertility and Sterility, 96, 966-968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.1109

17. Moreira, P., Fall, C., Dieng, T., Fall, A., Diouf, A. and Moreau, J.C. (2008) Assistance Médicale à la procréation: Indication et perception par les couples présentant une infertilité au centre hospitalier universitaire de Dakar. Mali Médical, 23, 50-56.

18. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. WHO, Geneva, 894.

19. Mboloko, E., Nzau, N.E. and Lokengo, L. (2011) itinéraire de la femme kinoise à la recherche des soins d’infertilité. Annals of African Medicine, 4, 855-863.

20. Mboloko, E.J., Yanga, K., Nguma, M., Lusanba, D., Kabwe, M., Tshiamu, B., et al. (1996) Les lésions tubaires et péritonéales à la coelioscopie chez les femmes stériles aux cliniques universitaires de Kinshasa. Panorama Médical, 1, 796-796.

21. Cissé, C.T., Cissé, M.L., Moréira, I.V., Dionne, P. and Diadhou, F. (1997) Maladies sexuellement transmissibles et stérilité féminine au CHU de Dakar: Prise en charge et moyens de prévention. Concept Fertil Sex, 25, 58-63.

22. Belaisch-Allart, J., et al. (2009) Infertilité dite inexpliquée: Quel bilan en 2009? Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens francais. Extrait des mises à jour en Gynécologie Médicale. 7-19.

23. Stacey, A., Misser, Sc.D., David, B.S. and Tarun, J. (2011) Cultural Factors Contributing to Health Care Disparities among Patients with Infertility in Midwestern States. Fertility and Sterility, 95, 1943-1949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.039

24. Broekmans, F.J., Knauff, A.H., Egbert, R., Veide, T., Macklon, N.S. and Fauser, B.C. (2007) Female Reproductive Ageing: Current Knowledge and Future Trends. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 18, 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2007.01.004

25. Mboloko, E., Muhindo, M., Ingala, A., Nzau, N.E., Lokengo, L.D., Bikuelo, B., Kapend, M.M.M. and Mboloko, M. (2017) Uterine Leiomyoma in an Infertile Population in Kinshasa (DR Congo). Annals of African Medicine, 10, 2635-2642.

26. Schwartz, D. (1981) Importance de la durée d’infécondité dans l’appréciation de la fertilité du couple. Population, 2, 237-250. https://doi.org/10.2307/1532547

27. Zorn, J.R. and Savale, M. (2005) Stérilité du couple: Assistance Médicale à la Procréation. Masson, Paris, 19,285-320.

28. Belaisch-Allart, J. (2002) Désir de grossesse et déclin de la fertilité. Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens francais. Extrait des mises à jour en Gynécologie Médicale. 60-71.

29. Fisch, H., Goluboff, E., Olson, J., Feldshuh, J., Broder, S. and Barad, D. (1996) Semen Analyses in 1283 Men from the United States over a 25-Years Period: No Decline in Quality. Fertility and Sterility, 65, 1009-1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58278-8

30. Auger, J., Kunstmann, J.M., Czyglik, F. and Jouannet, P. (1995) Decline in Semen Quality among Fertile Men in Paris during the Past 20 Years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 332, 281-285. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199502023320501

31. Gesink Law, D.C., Maclehose, R.F. and Longnecker, M.P. (2007) Obesity and Time to Pregnancy. Human Reproduction, 22, 414-420. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del400

32. Brewer, J.C. and Baleen, A.H. (2010) The Adverse Effects of Obesity on Conception and Implantation. Reproduction, 140, 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0568

33. Mboloko, E.J., Yanga, K., Nguma, M., Mputu, L. and Wolomby, M. (1998) La validité des résultats de l’hystérosalpingographie dans l’exploration de la stérilité du couple aux Cliniques Universitaires de Kinshasa. Congo Médical, 2, 408-411.

34. Davuluri, S. (2018) Current Trends in Management of Azoospermia and Oligoasthenospermia. In: Rao, K.A., Ed., The Infertility Manual, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, 140-145.