Tip60 Tumor Suppressor Requires Its NLS Motif to Interact with Importin <i>α</i>

Tip60 is a specific member of MYST (Moz-Ybf2/Sas3-Sas2-Tip60) family of nuclear histone acetyltransferases (HAT). It is essential for cellular survival, differentiation, and metabolism. A putative canonical NLS motif between the chromo domain and the zinc finger of Tip60 was identified. Here we show evidence that Tip60 is associated with importin α as its substrate and transported from cytoplasm to the nucleus. Pull down assay revealed that Tip60 was physically associated with importin α both in vivo and in vitro. Confocal microscopic observation showed that Tip60 and importin α were co-localized with each other. The localization of Tip60 to the nuclear and its interaction with importin α was disrupted when its putative NLS motif for binding to importin α was mutated ( ²¹⁹RKRK ²²² &#8594 ²¹⁹AAAA ²²²). However, attachment of this putative NLS motif to a cytoplasmic protein (YAP 1-210 fragment) promoted its nuclear localization. Based on transient transfection, Tip60 NLS motif mutant showed a substantial reduction in self-acetylation, HAT activity, and apoptotic ability whereas wild type Tip60 did not show such reduction. Taken together, our results demonstrate that importin α transports Tip60 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus through binding to the putative NLS motif of Tip60 for its tumor suppressing function.

• Tip60
• Importin α
• Nuclear Localization Sequence
• Protein-Protein Interaction
• HAT Activity
• Cell Survival

1. Introduction

Tip60 (Isoform1: NP874369, 546 aa in length), a protein associated with human immunodeficiency virus type 1-encoded transactivation protein (Tat), has been characterized as a specific member of MYST (Moz-Ybf2/Sas3-Sas2-Tip60) family of nuclear histone acetyltransferases (HATs) [1] [2] [3] . To elucidate its biological roles and identify proteins interacted with ectopically expressed Tip60, the presence of associated ATPase and DNA helicase activities has been demonstrated [4] [5] . Functional experiments have revealed that Tip60 and its associated proteins play essential roles in DNA repair and apoptosis [6] [7] . Moreover, Tip60 appears to be related to a variety of cellular functions depending on acetylation of its substrate proteins [4] [8] [9] [10] . Protein acetylation is a modification by acetyltransferases that catalyze the transfer of acetyl groups from acetyl coenzyme A to either ε-amino group of internal lysine residues or ε-amino group of N-terminal amino acids [11] [12] .

While mechanisms involved in regulation of Tip60 are not fully defined yet, the precise control of its function appears to be achieved through a combination of acetylation, localization, and interaction with Tip60 binding proteins [4] [13] . Even though Tip60 is predominantly located in the nuclei, it is also present in the cytosol and mitochondria [8] [14] [15] . Therefore, the mechanism how subcellular localization of Tip60 is controlled remains unclear. Analysis of its amino acid sequence does not reveal the presence of any recognizable import or export sequences. Others have demonstrated that Tip60 binding proteins also regulate the subcellular localization of Tip60 by inhibiting its nuclear export [1] [8] [11] [12] [13] . Thus, subcellular localization of Tip60 might be indirectly regulated through its association with binding proteins.

Nucleocytoplasmic protein transport is mainly mediated by importin proteins (importins/exportins) [16] [17] . More than 19 human importins and 14 yeast importins have been characterized recently [18] [19] . Among them, importin α can recognize and bind substrates via nuclear canonical localization signals (cNLSs) for transport through the nuclear pore complex [6] - [21] . Once inside the nucleus, imported importin α can bind to small GTPases, such as RanGTPase and release their substrates [22] [23] [24] . Different sets of substrates with distinct NLSs are recognized by several importins [16] [17] [18] [19] . A well-characterized canonical NLS is the short and basic cNLS associated with Kapα/importin α heterodimer (yeast Kap95p) [23] [24] . Monopartite cNLSs consist of a single cluster of basic residues with a consensus sequence of K(K/R)X(K/R), while bipartite NLSs have two clusters of basic residues separated by 10-12 amino acids [20] [25] [26] . Thus, the cNLS is a relatively small but well defined NLS that has concentrated binding energy.

Through visual inspection of Tip60 amino acid sequence, it was noticed that Tip60 contains a putative importin α binding motif (²¹⁰RRAVAAQPGRKRK²²²) [20] [23] [24] [25] [26] . Thus, the objective of this study was to determine whether Tip60 could interact with importin α, and investigate whether such interaction might be related to the tumor suppressor function of Tip60. Consequently, our study determined at the first time that Tip60 NLS promotes its nuclear localization through binding with importin α and enhances its tumor suppressor function. Our observations might provide the clue on the molecular mechanism underlying Tip60 tumor suppressor function which is regulated by its unclear localization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Antibodies

Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against actin, EGFP, importin α, Tip60, and acetylation protein were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) or Cell Signaling (Boston, MA, USA).

2.2. Cell Culture and Transfections

HEK293 cells were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1000 U penicillin-streptomycin (GIBCO BRL). Transfection was conducted with Lipofectamine LTX and Plus Reagent (Invitrogen) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.3. Plasmid Constructs

Wild type human Tip60 in EGFP-mammalian expression vector or GST-tagged E. coli expression vector was purchased from GeneCopoeia Co. (CA, USA). In order to generate importin α-binding motif mutant, Tip60 NLS mutant (²¹⁹RKRK²²² à ²¹⁹AAAA²²²) construct, mutagenic primers (UP: 5'-TGT AAC ATA GTC GCA TTG GCT TAT TTC TTC TAC-3', DOWN: 5'-GGA GTA GAA GAA ATA AGC CAA TGC GAC TAT GTT ACA-3' and up: 5'-ATA GTC CGA TTG CGT GCT TTC TTC GCC TCC AGT GGT-3', DOWN: 5'-CTT CTC ACC ACT GGA GGC GAA GAA AGC ACG CAA TCG-3'), and QuikChange Multi Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, West Cedar, TX, USA) were utilized according to the manufacturer’s instructions GST-tagged recombinant proteins for Tip60 and NLS mutants were purified from Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) after performing PCR and cloning. All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Human YAP cDNA was obtained from the Korea Human Gene Bank (Gene ID: KIAA0623) and cloned into pEGFP1 vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA; EGFP was added to the N-terminal of YAP) with the following primers: forward, 5'-CTCAAGCTTCGAATTCATGGAGGTGGTGGGTGAC-3' and reverse 5'-CATAGCACCGCAACCGTGTGAGAATTCTGCAGTCGAC-3'. For deletion mutant 1-210 aa, the following primers were used: forward, 5'-GCC ATG CTG TCC CAG TAG AAC GTC ACA GCC-3' and reverse, 5'-GGG GGC TGT GAC GTT CTA CTG GGA CAG CAT-3'. For fusion of Tip60 NLS motif (²¹⁰RRAVAAQPGRKRK²²²) to the cytoplasmic protein (C-terminal tail of YAP 1-210 fragment), oligonucleotide 36 mer (5'-CGT AGG GCA GTG GCA GCC CAG CCA GCA CGG AAC CGA AAA-3'; Bioneer, Co, Daejeon, Korea) corresponding to the motif’s amino acids was inserted by DNA ligation. The construct was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

2.4. Expression and Purification of Recombinant Proteins

GST tagged protein Tip60 WT or Tip0 NLS mutant was expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified with GST-agarose beads (Amersham Biosciences Co.) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Purified proteins were used for pull down assay with importin α.

2.5. Immunoprecipitation

Cells were routinely analyzed at 48 hours post transfection. Cells were rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and resuspended in 1 mL of extraction buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl pH7.4, 1mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 100 mM NaCl, 1.0% Triton X-100, 60 mM n-octyl glucoside, 1 mM vanadate, 100 μM molybdate, 20 mM sodium fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail (1 tablet per 10 ml extraction buffer)]. Pre-cleaned lysate was incubated with appropriate antibody at 4˚C for 1 hour. The resulting immune complex was collected on Protein A-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia). Immune complexes were then captured by centrifugation, washed extensively with lysis buffer, and solubilized with 2 × sample buffer prior 10% SDS-PAGE.

2.6. Tip60 Pull Down Assay

Whole cell lysate of HEK293 cells was pre-cleaned with glutathione agarose beads and incubated with 1 μg of each glutathione agarose tagged recombinant GST-Tip60 (WT) or NLS mutant at 4˚C on an end-over-end rotating shaker for 2 hours in order to allow for the association of Tip60 protein with importin α. Associated protein complexes were collected using slurry of glutathione agarose beads and washed extensively. After resuspension in 2 × Laemmli sample buffer, samples were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis using importin α antibody [27] .

2.7. Immunoblotting

Pull down or immunoprecipitated Tip60 was subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, incubated in blocking buffer (5% non-fat dried milk PBS and 0.05% Tween-20), probed with specific primary antibodies, and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immune complexes were detected with chemiluminescence western blotting detection system (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA).

2.8. Confocal Microscopy

HEK293 cells were cultured overnight at 60% confluence on glass slides coated with human fibronectin (SPL, Korea). The next day, cells were transfected with EGFP Tip60 WT or its NLS mutant construct and incubated for an additional 48 hours. Cells were washed several times with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 10 minutes. Fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes and blocked with PBS containing 5% BSA (Aurion, The Netherlands) and 0.1% Tween for 2 hours. After incubation with a polyclonal (rabbit) or monoclonal (mouse) antibody against importin α or Tip60 (1:300 in 5% BSA-PBS; Bio-Protocol, Palo Alto, CA, USA) overnight at 4˚C, slides were washed three times with 0.01% PBS-Tween 20. Alexa Fluor 568 or 488-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR, USA) was used. Confocal microscopy analysis was conducted using a LSM710 (Zeiss, Germany) at the Center for Research Instruments and Experimental Facilities of Chungbuk National University. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) of co-localization between importin α and Tip60 was measured with LSM710 (Zeiss, Germany) [28] .

2.9. FACS Analysis

EGFP-Tip60 (WT), NLS mutant, or EGFP vector was transfected and the rate of apoptosis was measured using Annexin V-PE apoptosis detection kit I (BD Biosciences, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were vortexed gently and incubated at 25˚C in the dark for 15 min. FACS analysis was performed using FACS Calibur (BD Science) in the Core Facility of Chungbuk National University within 1 hour after adding 400 μl of binding buffer to each tube [8] [9] .

2.10. ELISA for Histone Acetyltransferase (HAT) of Tip60

Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated as described above except that high salt wash step was omitted. Immuprecipitates were washed twice in HAT assay buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8/10% glycerol/0.1mM EDTA/1mM DTT) and incubated in 60 μl of HAT assay buffer containing acetyl-CoA (100 μM) and biotinylated histone H4 peptide (0.5 μg) at 30˚C for 30 min. An aliquot of the reaction was immobilized onto streptavidin plates. Lysine acetylation was detected via HAT ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biovision Milpitas, CA). In some assays, HAT activity was analyzed with Tip60 immobilized onto NiTA-agarose beads [8] [9] .

2.11. Statistics

Data are shown as means ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.). Statistical significance was performed via Welch’s t-test or Student’s t-test. Statistically significance was considered at P < 0.05 [28] .

3. Results

3.1. Importin α Interacts with Tip60 through the Putative Nuclear Localization Sequences (NLS) of Tip60

Putative importin α binding motifs are present in most proteins associated with importin α [23] [24] [25] [26] . Diverse NLS sequences consistently contain a weak consensus motif composed of a loose N-terminal hydrophobic or basic motif (http://www.moseslab.csb.utoronto.ca/NLStradamus/). Based on this information, Tip60 (Isoform1:NP874369) was also found to contain a putative importin α-binding motif in between its chromodomain and zinc finger (Figure 1(A)) as

an NLS [1] . The presence of such putative NLS suggests that Tip60 might be imported by importin α.

Since Tip60 appeared to contain a putative importin α binding motif, whether endogenous importin α could form protein complex with Tip60 in HEK293 cells was examined. As shown in Figure 1(B), Tip60 immunoprecipitate was found to contain importin α (right panel). Antibodies directed against importin α were also able to successfully capture Tip60 from the same lysate (Figure 1(B), left panel), corroborating the hypothesis that the two proteins were indeed physically associated. Furthermore, confocal microscopy was performed to determine whether Tip60 was co-localized with importin α in cells. Results are shown in Figure 1(C). Endogenous Tip60 (green) and importin α (red) were indeed co-localized in the nucleus (white) and cytoplasm (yellow). Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) between importin α and Ti60 was measured to be 0.81 +/− 0.12 (n = 10), meaning that 82% of these two proteins co-existed in the cell. The association between Tip60 and importin α was also observed in COS-1 and NIH3T3 cells as in HEK 293 cell (data not shown). These results strongly suggest that endogenous Tip60 can interact with importin α in cells.

3.2. The Interaction between Exogenous Tip60 and Importin α Is Required for Its Nuclear Localization in HEK293 Cells

To determine whether the putative NLS in Tip60 could interact with importin α, Tip60 NLS point mutant (²¹⁹RKRK²²² à ²¹⁹AAAA²²²) was constructed. After transfection of EGFP vector, EGFP Tip60 WT, or EGFP Tip60 NLS mutant in HEK293 cells, each EGFP- fusion protein was purified with EGFP antibody. To detect protein-protein interaction between Tip60 and importin α (or its acetylation), western blot was conducted with anti-acetylation, anti-importin α, or anti-Tip60 antibody. To monitor expression levels of Tip60 and its NLS mutant, western blot analysis was performed using anti-Tip60 antibody. To monitor cell lysate amount, immunoblotting was performed using anti-action antibody (Figure 2(A), bottom lane). As expected, Tip60 WT containing the putative importin α binding motif pulled down importin α from HEK293 cell lysates in high quantities, whereas Tip60 NLS mutant without the putative NLS sequence failed to pull-down appreciable amounts of importin α (Figure 2(A)). Interestingly, EGFP-Tip60 WT was profoundly acetylated (Figure 2(A) top lane). However, Tip60 NLS mutant mainly detected in the cytoplasm was not acetylated (Figure 2(D)), suggesting that Tip60 nuclear localization also associated with its acetylation.

To further confirm that the putative NLS motif (²¹⁰RRAVAAQPGRKRK²²²) of Tip60 could function as a classic NLS, importin α pull down assay was performed using GST-tagged Tip60 WT or NLS mutant fusion proteins expressed in E. coli. Our results revealed that both wild-type Tip60 fusion proteins pulled down importin α from HEK293 cell lysates in high quantities whereas its NLS mutant fusion proteins failed to pull down importin α (Figure 1(B)). This result was consistent with the co-immunoprecipitation result (Figure 1(A)). To better understand the function of the interaction between Tip60 and importin α, confocal microscopic analysis was performed (Figure 2(C) and Figure 2(D)).

Consistent with co-localization between endogenous Tip60 and importin α as shown in Figure 1(C), exogenous EGFP Tip60 WT (green) and importin α (red) were also co-localized together (yellow) in the nucleus (Figure 2(C)). However, exogenous EGFP-Tip 60 NLS mutant (²¹⁹RKRK²²² à ²¹⁹AAAA²²²; green) did not merge or co-localize with importin α (red) in the nucleus (Figure 2(D)) probably due to mutations at the importin α binding site. Tip60 NLS mutant excluding the putative NLS sequence did not co-localized strongly with importin α in the nucleus either (Figure 2(D)). Furthermore, Tip60 mutant was less (1/4) self-acetylated than Tip60 WT (Figure 2(A)), suggesting that subcellular localization of Tip60 was influenced by its acetylation (Figure 2(D)). PCC between Tip60 WT and importin α was 0.86 +/− 0.07 (n = 5) in Figure 2(C). That of Tip60 NLS mutant and importin α was reduced to 0.23 +/− 0.06 (n = 5) in Figure 2(D). The decrease of PCC in Tip60 NLS mutant with importin α indicated that the co-existence (or interaction) of both proteins in cells was probably reduced to 1/4 level of the value of Tip60 WT.

Comparing confocal results of Tip60 WT to those of NLS mutant, our data strongly demonstrated that importin α could interact with Tip60 through its putative consensus motif of Tip60. In addition, protein-protein interaction between Tip60 and importin α is required for the subcellular localization of Tip60 to the nucleus and its self-acetylation. These results (Figures 2(A)-(D)) demonstrated unequivocally that importin α could bind to Tip60 through the putative NLS motif of Tip60.

3.3. Nuclear Localization of Cytoplasmic Protein Is Promoted by Fusion of Tip60 Motif

As shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, the putative NLS motif of Tip60 contributed to its physical interaction with importin α and its nuclear localization. To determine whether the putative NLS in Tip60 could interact with importin α, Tip60 NLS (²¹⁰RRAVAAQPGRKRK²²²) motif was fused to YAP (Yes associated protein 65) 1-210 fragment C-terminal tail mainly localized in the cytoplasm based on our unpublished data [29] . After transfecting EGFP vector, EGFP YAP 1-210 fragment WT, or EGFP YAP 1-210 Tip60 NLS motif in HEK293 cells, each EGFP-fusion protein was purified with EGFP antibody. To monitor the expression level of Tip60 and its NLS mutant, western blot was also performed using anti-Tip60 Ab (Figure 3(C)). Yap 1-210 fragment fused with Tip60 NLS motif interacted with importin α, although EGFP-Yap 1-210 fragment itself did not interact with importin α. In addition, EGFP-Yap 1-210 was not localized in the nucleus. Our observation suggests that Tip60 motif is both necessary and sufficient as a NLS to facilitate the interaction between Tip60 and importin α (Figure 4).

3.4. Effect of Cytoplasmic Localization of Tip60 on Cell Viability and its HAT Activity

As shown in Table 1, NLS mutants significantly increased cell survival rate compared to EGFP-Tip60 WT or NLS mutant which interacted with importin α. As

Table 1

The comparison of cell survival ratio of Tip60 WT with its NLS mutant. EGFP-Tip60 WT, its NLS mutant ( 219 RKRK 222 à 219 AAAA 222 ), or EGFP vector was transfected and the rate of apoptosis measured by FACS. EGFP-NLS mutant, which was not dominantly localized into the nuclear was less effective on the cell apoptosis, compared to Tip60 WT constructs. The apoptotic effect of NLS mutant was reduced to 55% of Tip60 WT

Tip60	Rate of apoptosis (%) by FACS
*WT	12.16 +/− 3
*NLS mutant (219RKRK222 à 219AAAA222)	6.67 +/− 4
(Vector only)	14.69 +/− 2

*P < 0.05. Mean value of 5 repeats.

shown in Table 1, NLS mutant appeared to be 70% less effective on HEK293 cell apoptosis than EGFP-Tip60 WT. Thus, nuclear localization of Tip60 seems to be required for its effect on cell viability. However, because NLS mutant (²¹⁹RKRK²²² à ²¹⁹AAAA²²²) was less self-acetylated (Figure 2(A) upper lane), the effect of Tip60 on cell viability might be related to its HAT activity (Table 2). This suggests that proper localization of Tip60 is required for its effect on both cell viability and HAT activity. Tip60 NLS mutant which ablated its association with importin α showed both less apoptotic effect (Table 1) and less HAT activity (Table 2) than Tip60 WT. Although mutation (²¹⁹RKRK²²² à ²¹⁹AAAA²²²) of Tip60 might have affected both cell viability and its HAT activity, our results strongly suggest that its nuclear localization is a prerequisite for its tumor promoting function.

In conclusion, our results indicate that Tip60 can bind to importin α through its binding domain containing the putative NLS motif (²¹⁰RRAVAAQPGRKRK²²²) and that this interaction can regulate its function (HAT activity and apoptotic ability) by controlling its nuclear localization.

Table 2

The comparison of HAT activity of Tip60 WT with its NLS mutant with ELISA. EGFP-Tip60 WT, its NLS mutant ( 219 RKRK 222 à 219 AAAA 222 ), or EGFP vector was transfected and each HAT was measured by ELISA. The HAT of NLS mutant was reduced to 75% that of Tip60 WT

Tip60	ELIA assay (relative activity; %)
**WT	100+/− 6
**NLS mutant (219RKRK222 à 219AAAA222)	74+/− 5
(Vector only)	10+/− 4

**P < 0.05. Mean value of 10 repeats.

4. Discussion

The function of Tip60 in signal transduction has been most clearly characterized in the context of HAT signaling, in which it functions as a hub protein HAT [4] [13] . Results of the present study demonstrated that importin α could function as one Tip60 nuclear transporter. In addition, the putative Tip60 NLS is localized between chromodomain and Zn²⁺ finger based on site-directed mutagenesis analysis (Figure 1(A)).

Although our observation demonstrated that the interaction between Tip60 and importin α through NLS binding not only enhanced Tip60’s HAT activity, but also controlled its subcellular localization, our findings also raised several questions regarding the interaction between Tip60 and importin α. It remains unknown whether self-acetylation or Tip60’s HAT activity was actually necessary for its functional interaction with importin α in vivo. Further experiments are clearly warranted in order to gain a greater understanding of the biological implication regarding the high degree of conservation of a well-defined importin α binding motif in Tip60. Moreover, the fashion and mechanisms that control the interaction betweenTip60 and importin α need to be evaluated under physiological conditions. It is currently unclear which kind of cellular signal can enhance or reduce the interaction between these two proteins. In addition, it remains to be determined whether Tip60 NLS mutation itself affects HAT and self-acetylation activity of Tip60 regardless of protein-protein interaction with importin α. It is also necessary to ascertain whether post translational modification of importin α is required for the activation and/or regulation of Tip60 or for the interaction between Tip60 and importin α.

At the present time, whether NLS mutation of Tip60 directly affects self-acetylation (Figure 2(A)) which is required for its HAT activity (Table 2) remains unclear. Tip60 NLS mutant which could not be self-acetylated was mainly found in the cytoplasm based on confocal analysis (Figure 2(A), Figure 2(D)). The blockade of nuclear localization of NLS mutant might be due to the inhibition of importin α binding on its middle domain by point mutation, not by self-acetylation (on Lys109, Lys113, Lys222, or Lys360) or its HAT activity [30] . Because Lys222 of Tip60 is overlapped with the putative NLS, self-acetylation may affect binding between importin α and Tip60 (Figure 1(A)). Even though it remains to be characterized whether self-acetylation is dependent on its import or export, nuclear localization of Tip60 seems to be dependent on acetylation at its lysine residues [30] .

Results of this study demonstrated that importin α could bind to Tip60 through the putative NLS motif located between the chromodomain and Zn²⁺ finger domain of Tip 60 (Figure 1). This motif is found in all Tip60 family proteins available in GenBank (data not shown). Results on both self-acetylation activity and HAT activity of Tip60 revealed that these activities were inhibited upon engagement with importin α (Figure 3). Therefore, importin α might act as an agonistic to signal transduction involving Tip60. Although data of this study suggest that the importin α may function as a positive regulator of Tip60 signaling, the precise mechanism underlying the nuclear localization of Tip60 requires further characterization in order to gain better insight into the overall function of importin α signal transduction pathway (Figure 4). Tip60 also contains a putative PY-NLS (²⁷¹grhrlkpwyspypqelttl²⁹⁰) in front of its Zn²⁺ finger (Figure 1(A)) [1] [16] [28] . We cannot rule out the possibility that karyopherin β might also contribute to the nuclear localization of Tip60 [1] [16] [29] . Further experiments are needed to demonstrate whether karyopherin β also imports Tip60. If this is the case, what is its distinguishable role in Tip60 nuclear localization? However, PY-NLS recognized by karyopherin β₂ (Kap104p in yeast) is a larger linear signal that is quite diverse in sequence, in contrast to the canonical small monopartite cNLS [1] [16] [28] .

We also observed that Tip60 was associated with chromosome region maintenance 1 (CRM1) for its export from the nucleus (unpublished data). The potential nuclear export sequence (NES) motif (²⁸¹grhrlkpwyf spypqelttlpvlylcefcl³⁰⁰) in Tip60 is also noticed. This motif is similar to the consensus NES motif (Φx_2-3Φx_2-3LxL/I). Tip60 export seems to be mediated by CRM1 [1] [30] . Treatment with Leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1, enhanced Tip60 accumulation in the nucleus (our unpublished data). Therefore, CRM1 might mediate Tip60 export through its NES motif [1] [30] . However, detail mechanisms involved in Tip60 import/ export remain to be characterized.

Interestingly, self-acetylation on lysine residue 301 which is overlapped with CRM1 binding seems to inhibit its export by CRM1 (Figure 4 and Figure 2(A) upper lane) [1] [28] [30] . The nuclear retained Tip60 might be recruited to transcriptional factors (or other proteins) for unfolding chromatin. Yes-associated protein (YAP, a Hippo signal pathway intermediator, co-transcriptional factor) also binds to Tip60 through its WW domain in the nucleus (unpublished data). However, the detailed mechanism of how Tip60 is (de)acetylated and biological significance underlying this modification remain to be characterized. In the future, characterization of Tip60 NLS may contribute to new strategies to understand and manipulate its cellular actions in gene expression and apoptosis as well as its involvement in human diseases [4] [13] [30] [31] .

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant (NRF-2013R1A1A4A01005522 and NRF-2016R1D1A3B03934269) to S. S. Kang. Shin is a Korean Research fellowship recipient (NRF-2014R1A1A2009622).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Abbreviations

HAT: histone acetyltransferases

cNLSs: nuclear classic localization signals

FBS: fetal bovine serum

CRM: chromosome region maintenance 1

NES: nuclear export sequence

IP: immunoprecipitation

IB: using an anti-importin α antibody, an immunoblot

References

1. Kamine, J., Elangovan, B., Subramanian, T., Coleman, D. and Chinnadurai, G. (1996) Identification of a Cellular Protein That Specifically Interacts with the Essential Cysteine Region of the HIV-1 Tat Transactivator. Virology, 216, 357-366.

2. Yamamoto, T. and Horikoshi, M. (1997) Novel Substrate Specificity of the Histone Acetyltransferase Activity of HIV-1-Tat Interactive Protein Tip60. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 30595-30598. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.49.30595

3. Lemercier, C., Legube, G., Caron, C., Louwagie, M., Garin, J., Trouche, D. and Khochbin, S. (2003) Tip60 Acetyltransferase Activity Is Controlled by Phosphorylation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 4713-4718. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M211811200

4. Sapountzi, V., Logan, I.R. and Robson, C.N. (2006) Cellular Functions of TIP60. The International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 38, 1496-1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.003

5. Col, E., Caron, C., Chable-Bessia, C., Legube, G., Gazzeri, S., Komatsu, Y., Yoshida, M., Benkirane, M., Trouche, D. and Khochbin, S. (2005) HIV-1 Tat Targets Tip60 to Impair the Apoptotic Cell Response to Genotoxic Stresses. The EMBO Journal, 24, 2634-2645. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600734

6. Bock, F.J., Tanzer, M.C., Haschka, M.D., Krumschnabel, G., Sohm, B., Goetsch, K., Kofler, R. and Villunger, A. (2015) The p53 Binding Protein PDCD5 Is Not Rate-Limiting in DNA Damage Induced Cell Death. Scientific Reports, 5, Article No. 11268. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11268

7. Cui, H., Li, X., Han, C., Wang, Q.E., Wang, H., Ding, H.F., Zhang, J. and Yan, C. (2016) The Stress-Responsive Gene ATF3 Mediates Dichotomous UV Responses by Regulating the Tip60 and p53 Proteins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 291, 10847-10857. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M115.713099

8. Lee, E.J., Shin, S.H., Hyun, S., Chun, J. and Kang, S.S. (2012) Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress Enhances Tip60 (A Histone Acetyltransferase) Binding to the Concanavalin A. The Open Biochemistry Journal, 6, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874091X01206010001

9. Shin, S.H. and Kang, S.S. (2013) Phosphorylation of Tip60 Tyrosine 327 by Abl Kinase Inhibits HAT Activity through Association with FE65. The Open Biochemistry Journal, 7, 66-72. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874091X20130622002

10. Hilfiker, A., Hilfiker-Kleiner, D., Pannuti, A. and Lucchesi, JC. (1997) Mof, A Putative Acetyl Transferase Gene Related to the Tip60 and MOZ Human Genes and to the SAS Genes of Yeast, Is Required for Dosage Compensation in Drosophila. The EMBO Journal, 16, 2054-2060. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.8.2054

11. Kimura, A. and Horikoshi, M. (1998) Tip60 Acetylates Six Lysines of a Specific Class in Core Histones in Vitro. Genes to Cells: Devoted to Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms, 3, 789-800. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2443.1998.00229.x

12. Legube, G., Linares, L.K., Lemercier, C., Scheffner, M., Khochbin, S. and Trouche, D. (2002) Tip60 Is Targeted to Proteasome-Mediated Degradation by Mdm2 and Accumulates after UV Irradiation. The EMBO Journal, 21, 1704-1712. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.7.1704

13. Fu, M., Wang, C., Zhang, X. and Pestell, R.G. (2004) Acetylation of Nuclear Receptors in Cellular Growth and Apoptosis. Biochemical Pharmacology, 68, 1199-1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2004.05.037

14. Logan, I.R., Sapountzi, V., Gaughan, L., Neal, D.E. and Robson, C.N. (2004) Control of Human PIRH2 Protein Stability: Involvement of TIP60 and the Proteosome. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279, 11696-11704. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M312712200

15. Zhuge, C., Chang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, Y. and Lei, J. (2011) PDCD5-Regulated Cell Fate Decision after Ultraviolet-Irradiation-Induced DNA Damage. Biophysical Journal, 101, 2582-2591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.10.044

16. Chook, Y.M. and Blobel, G. (2001) Karyopherins and Nuclear Import. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 11, 703-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-440X(01)00264-0

17. Okada, N., Ishigami, Y., Suzuki, T., Kaneko, A., Yasui, K., Fukutomi, R. and Isemura, M. (2008) Importins and Exportins in Cellular Differentiation. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 12, 1863-1871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00437.x

18. Christie, M., Chang, C.W., Rona, G., Smith, K.M., Stewart, A.G., Takeda, A.A., Fontes, M.R., Stewart, M., Vertessy, B.G., Forwood, J.K. and Kobe, B. (2016) Structural Biology and Regulation of Protein Import into the Nucleus. Journal of Molecular Biology, 428, 2060-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.10.023

19. Soniat, M. and Chook, Y.M. (2015) Nuclear Localization Signals for Four Distinct Karyopherin-β Nuclear Import Systems. The Biochemical Journal, 468, 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20150368

20. Gilchrist, D. and Rexach, M. (2003) Molecular Basis for the Rapid Dissociation of Nuclear Localization Signals from Karyopherin α in the Nucleoplasm. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 51937-51949. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307371200

21. Hariton-Gazal, E., Friedler, D., Friedler, A., Zakai, N., Gilon, C. and Loyter, A. (2002) Inhibition of Nuclear Import by Backbone Cyclic Peptidomimetics Derived from the HIV-1 MA NLS Sequence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1594, 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4838(01)00306-5

22. Gorlich, D., Pante, N., Kutay, U., Aebi, U. and Bischoff, F.R. (1996) Identification of Different Roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in Nuclear Protein Import. The EMBO Journal, 15, 5584-5594. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00943.x

23. Percipalle, P., Clarkson, W.D., Kent, H.M., Rhodes, D. and Stewart, M. (1997) Molecular Interactions between the Importin α/β Heterodimer and Proteins Involved in Vertebrate Nuclear Protein Import. Journal of Molecular Biology, 266, 722-732. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1996.0801

24. Floer, M., Blobel, G. and Rexach, M. (1997) Disassembly of RanGTP-Karyopherin β Complex, an Intermediate in Nuclear Protein Import. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272, 19538-19546. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.31.19538

25. Pries, R., Bomeke, K., Draht, O., Kunzler, M. and Braus, G.H. (2004) Nuclear Import of Yeast Gcn4p Requires Karyopherins Srp1p and Kap95p. Molecular Genetics and Genomics: MGG, 271, 257-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-003-0955-7

26. Fries, T., Betz, C., Sohn, K., Caesar, S., Schlenstedt, G. and Bailer, S.M. (2007) A Novel Conserved Nuclear Localization Signal Is Recognized by a Group of Yeast Importins. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 19292-19301. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700217200

27. Laemimi, U.K. (1970) Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227, 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0

28. Sudol M. ,et al. (1994)Yes-Associated Protein (YAP65) Is a Proline-Rich Phosphoprotein That Binds to the SH3 Domain of the Yes Proto-Oncogene Product Oncogene 9, 2145-2152.

29. Yang, C., Wu, J. and Zheng, Y.G. (2012) Function of the Active Site Lysine Autoacetylation in Tip60 Catalysis. PLoS ONE, 7, e32886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032886

30. Shin, S.H., Lee, E.J., Chun, J., Hyun, S. and Kang, S.S. (2015) ULK2 Ser 1027 Phosphorylation by PKA Regulates Its Nuclear Localization Occurring through Karyopherin Beta 2 Recognition of a PY-NLS Motif. PLoS ONE, 10, e0127784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127784

31. Nayak, G. and Cooper, G.M. (2012) p53 Is a Major Component of the Transcriptional and Apoptotic Program Regulated by PI 3-Kinase/Akt/GSK3 Signaling. Cell Death and Disease, 3, e400. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2012.138