<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JBM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Biosciences and Medicines</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5081</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jbm.2019.72005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JBM-90422</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of Ocular Parameters on Medial Rectus Faden Operation with Recession for Esotropia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mustafa</surname><given-names>Doğan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Birsen</surname><given-names>Gökyiğit</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Serpil</surname><given-names>Akar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ömer</surname><given-names>Faruk Yılmaz</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Baskent University, Istanbul, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, Private Office, Istanbul, Turkey</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>01</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>54</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2019</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>2,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: In the treatment of infantile and accommodative esotopia medial rectus (MR) recession combined posterior fixation suture (Faden operation) can be used. But, there is very limited literature on effect of ocular parameters (axial length, medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus) to this operation. Objective: To evaluate effects of ocular parameters on medial rectus Faden operations with recession for esotropia. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, 38 patients (57 eyes) who underwent Faden operation with unilateral or bilateral recession (4 - 4.5 mm) on medial rectus were divided into three groups according to axial length, medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus. Preoperative and postoperative deviations compared. Results: 11 cases were infantile esotropia, 46 cases were acquired esotropia. Female/male rate was 19/19. The mean preoperative amount of esotropia at near was 49.95 &#177; 17.36 prism diopters (PD) and postoperative 1 week 11.77 &#177; 11.14 PD, 1 month 12.02 &#177; 11.52 PD and 6 months 9.46 &#177; 10.19 PD. The mean preoperative amount of esotropia at distance was 38.84 &#177; 19.03 PD and postoperative 1 week 7.25 &#177; 11.29 PD, 1 month 6.54 &#177; 10.52 PD and 6 months 4.40 &#177; 9.08 PD. Due to axial length, in shorter eyes, the decrease in mean post-operative deviation was statistically significant. Due to medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion, there was no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: Axial length has an effect on medial rectus Faden operations with recession but medial rectus width and medial rectus insertion distance from limbus do not.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Esotropia</kwd><kwd> Faden Operation</kwd><kwd> Axial Length</kwd><kwd> Medial Rectus Width</kwd><kwd> Medial  Rectus Distance from Limbus</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The management of essential infantile esotropia and convergence excess accommodative ET is highly controversial and has changed over the years. Some authors recommended bimedial rectus recession with the target angle. Others advocate adding posterior fixation suture to the medial rectus (MR) recession for controlling convergence excess ET. Other procedures such as marginal myotomy and slanted recession are less popular [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Many recommendations can be found in the literature about effectiveness of MR recession combined with posterior fixation suture (Faden operation) in high AC/A ratio accommodative ET [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The term “faden” is the German word for suture or string [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref1">1</xref>] . The faden operation, also termed posterior fixation suture, first described by C&#252;ppers in 1974 to treat incomitant strabismus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>It is used to weaken the rotational force of a rectus muscle when the eye rotates towards the faden muscle. The faden procedure is performed by suturing the rectus muscle to sclera, 12 mm to 14 mm posterior to the rectus muscle insertion. This pins the rectus muscle to the sclera so when the eye rotates towards the fadened muscle, the arc of contact cannot unravel. The faden suture thus creates a new insertion posterior to the original insertion. This posterior insertion shortens the moment arm when the eye rotates towards the fadened muscle. Shortening the moment arm reduces the rotational force as the eye rotates towards the fadened muscle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The faden operation may be helpful when the patient has an esotropia with a high AC/A ratio. Other indications for the faden operation have been reported including sixth nerve paresis, dissociated vertical deviation, nystagmus compensation syndrome, and nystagmus in primary position without a face turn. In addition, some have advocated using the faden operation on the lateral rectus muscle in patients with Duane’s retraction syndrome, and significant upshoot and downshoot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In the literature, there is very limited knowledge on effect of ocular parameters on this operation. Do axial length, medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus have effect on success rate?</p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate effects of ocular parameters (axial length, medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus) on medial rectus Faden operations with recession for esotropia.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Patients and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>In this retrospective study, the medical records from 38 patients who underwent the Faden operation on medial rectus muscles with recession for the treatment of esotropia between December 2005 to February 2007 in Beyoglu Eye Research and Training Hospital in İstanbul were reviewed.</p><p>The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Istanbul Professor Dr. N Reşat Belger Beyoglu Education and Research Eye Hospital Institutional Review Board. The study and the data collection conformed to all local laws and were compliant with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.Informed consent was obtained from each participant; for children younger than 18 years of age, consent was obtained from one or both of the parents.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Examination</title><p>Inclusion criteria were accommodative and partially accommodative esotropia (refractive or nonrefractive) and esotropia at near exceeding esotropia at distance by at least 10 prism diopters (PD).</p><p>Exclusion criteria were ocular or systemic diseases, a history of previous intraocular or strabismus surgery, neurological or developmental disorders, and a follow-up period of less than 1 year. Patients who had undergone concurrent oblique muscle surgery were also excluded.</p><p>The patients underwent a standard ophthalmologic examination, including refraction (cycloplegic refraction via sciascopy and autorefractokeratometer, best corrected visual acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, and detailed funduscopy. Visual acuity measurements were obtained with Snellen charts or Lea symbols. Ocular motility was evaluated with alternate prism and cover testing at 6 m and 33 cm and with the Krimsky test for patients of a younger age. Ductions and versions were examined and documented using traditional methods. Examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Surgical Procedure</title><p>All surgeries were performed by one surgeon (B.G.) under general anaesthesia. All patients received a posterior fixation suture on one or both medial rectus muscles at 12.50 or 13.50 mm from the insertion of the muscle with a nonabsorbable suture (5.0 Ethibond Excel (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ)). After careful dissection of the connective tissues around the muscle, the suture was fixed to the sclera on both sides of the muscle and a knot was made (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In the recession group, unilateral or bilateral recession (4 - 4.5 mm) was done and the Faden operation was performed followed by medial rectus recession.</p><p>A posterior fixation suture was performed based on the modified method of Cuppers described by de Decker [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref4">4</xref>] , and recommended guidelines based on the degree of esotropia were followed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref4">4</xref>] . MR muscles were sutured at 12.50 - 13.50 mm</p><p>from the insertion based on the angle of deviation (12.50 mm from the insertion for 20 - 30 pd of deviation angle, 13 mm for 40 pd, 13.50 mm for ≥50 pd).</p><p>Postoperatively, orthotropia or esotropia of &lt;10 pd at near and distance fixations with available optical correction and an elimination of near?distance disparity were jointly considered to be a satisfactory outcome.</p><p>Preoperative and postoperative axial length, medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus were obtained. According to axial length, medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus cases were divided into three groups (axial length; ≤21 mm, 21 - 22 mm, ≥22 mm. medial rectus width; ≤10.50 mm, 10.50 - 12 mm, ≥12 mm. The distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus; ≤4.25 mm, 4.25 - 5 mm, ≥5 mm). All groups were compared according to preoperative and postoperative deviation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 11; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for the data analysis. Categorical variables were presented as numbers, and numerical variables were expressed as means and standard deviations. The Kolmogorov?Smirnov test was used to assess the normal distribution of the data and the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and Paired Sample Test used. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>11 eyes were infantile esotropia, 46 eyes were acquired esotropia. Female/male rate was 19/19.</p><p>The comparison of deviations at distance and at near between preoperative and postoperative 1 week, 1 month and 6 months were statistically significant, (Tables 1-7, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). After surgery, the amount of deviation decreased both at distance and near fixation.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Surgical data</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of Operation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amount of case and (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amount of recession and Faden</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral recession + Fd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.342 &#177; 0.239 mm recession and 13.01 &#177; 0.32 mm Fd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral recession + Fd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (50%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.302 &#177; 0.248 mm recession and 12.84 &#177; 0.22 mm Fd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.324 &#177; 0.241 mm recession and 12.89 &#177; 0.27 mm Fd</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Preoperative and postoperative 1 week deviations, correction amounts, correction percentage and p value at distance</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preop Deviation PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postop 1 week PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.68 &#177; 15.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63 &#177; 6.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.42 &#177; 18.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.05 &#177; 11.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.84 &#177; 19.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.25 &#177; 1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Preoperative and postoperative 1 week deviations, correction amounts, correction percentage and p value at near</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preop Deviation PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postop 1 week PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.74 &#177; 4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.74 &#177; 9.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.05 &#177; 5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.29 &#177; 11.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.95 &#177; 17.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.77 &#177; 11.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Preoperative and postoperative 1 month deviations, correction amounts, correction percentage and p value at distance</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preop Deviation PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postop 1 month PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.68 &#177; 15.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.74 &#177; 11.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.42 &#177; 18.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.95 &#177; 10.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.84 &#177; 19.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.54 &#177; 10.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Preoperative and postoperative 1 month deviations, correction amounts, correction percentage and p value at near</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preop Deviation PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postop 1 month PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.74 &#177; 4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16 &#177; 12.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.05 &#177; 5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.95 &#177; 11.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.95 &#177;17.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.02 &#177; 11.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Preoperative and postoperative 6 month deviations, correction amounts, correction percentage and p value at distance</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preop Deviation PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postop 6 month PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.68 &#177; 15.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.37 &#177; 11.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.42 &#177; 18.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42 &#177; 8.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.84 &#177; 19.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40 &#177; 9.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Preoperative and postoperative 6 month deviations, correction amounts, correction percentage and p value at near</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preop Deviation PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postop 6 month PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Correction %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.74 &#177; 4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.26 &#177; 11.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bilateral MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.05 &#177; 5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.05 &#177; 9.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.95 &#177; 17.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.46 &#177; 10.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>According to medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus, between in all three groups comparison of correction in deviation, the difference was not statistically significant. But according to axial length between in all three groups comparison of correction in deviation, the difference was statistically significant. In ≤21 mm group the correction was higher than 21 - 22 mm group and ≥22 mm group. And in 21 - 22 mm group correction was higher than ≥22 mm group. So when axial length is shorter the correction in deviation was higher (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>In esotropia treatment with posterior fixation suture with or without MR muscle recession is controversial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref8">8</xref>] . And also, The Faden procedure is a difficult surgery and has some complications like glob perforation. Becuase muscles are sutured posteriorly, behind the equator and near to the vortex veins. Experienced surgeons can minimise the risk of complications.</p><p>Although it has some disadvantages, we found that Faden operation with or without MR muscle recession is effective for the treatment of esotropia.</p><p>Some authors reported that 76% - 86% of patients with convergence excess were capable.</p><p>of maintaining satisfactory near ocular alignment with bilateral Faden operations on the MR muscles at an average of 2 - 3 years of follow-up [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref7">7</xref>] . In our studies, 80.4% of cases showed satisfactory near ocular alignment.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Findings in axial length group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Axial Length</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preoperative Deviation At Distance PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Preoperative Deviation At Near PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postoperative 6 month Deviation At Distance PD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Postoperative 6 month Deviation At Near PD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤ 21 mm MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.42 &#177; 13.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.42 &#177; 12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.25 &#177; 4.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00 &#177; 5.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.00 - 22.00 mm MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.92 &#177; 16.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.81 &#177; 15.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.96 &#177; 10.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.38 &#177; 10.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥ 22 mm MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.00 &#177; 24.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.74 &#177; 21.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84 &#177; 8.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.16 &#177; 8.81</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Findings in axial length group</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Axial Length</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Correction At Distance PD &amp; %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Correction At Near PD &amp; %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤21 mm group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.67 &#177; 15.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.42 &#177; 13.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.08% &#177; 12.87%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.12% &#177; 13.45%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.00 - 22.00 mm group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.96 &#177; 15.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.42 &#177; 16.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.37% &#177; 45.60%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.36% &#177; 22.70%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥22 mm group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.16 &#177; 23.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.58 &#177; 19.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MD &#177; SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.30% &#177; 26.27%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.42% &#177; 18.99%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>De Decker, evaluated 235 patients who had a Faden procedure on the MR muscles and reported that 181 (76.5%) acheived a satisfactory outcome after 2 - 3 years of follow-up [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref4">4</xref>] . In our series, a satisfactory outcome of 91.94% at 6 month postoperatively. But, our follow-up time is not as long as de Decker. And some authors reported that by the time the effectiveness of this surgery decreases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref3">3</xref>] . So, maybe by the time our patients’ satisfactory outcomes would decrease.</p><p>Akar et all reported that 7.9% showed secondary exotropia at an average of 4.8 years of follow-up [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref3">3</xref>] . In our study, 6 Month postoperatively, only 3 patient had overcorrection.</p><p>Von Noorden performed Faden operations on previously recessed MR muscles in 12 patients with a persistent convergence excess-type esotropia. He reported that the operation reduced the deviation in all but one patient and was more effective at near fixation than at distance fixation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref9">9</xref>] . In our series, reduction of the near deviation was higher than reduction of the distance deviation after 6 month postoperatively.</p><p>Medial rectus muscle width is 10.30 mm on average [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref10">10</xref>] . In our study mean medial rectus muscle width was 11.09 &#177; 1.06 mm. To the best of our knowledge there is no data on relationship between postoperative correction of deviation and MR muscle width in conventional strabismus surgery and Faden surgery. In our study we did not find any correlation. There was no effect of MR muscle width on Faden operation. This may be due to 1/3 of muscle fixation on sclera.</p><p>Mims et al. did not find any correlation on deviation amounts and the distance of medial rectus muscle insertion to limbus in infantile esotropia patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref11">11</xref>] . In our study, mean distance of medial rectus muscle insertion to limbus was 4.78 &#177; 0.59 mm. There was no correlation between postoperative correction amount of deviation and distance between muscle insertion to limbus.</p><p>Kushner et al. found that there was an inverse correlation between axial length and correction in deviation in conventional esotropia surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref12">12</xref>] . In our study, our findings were similar. In patients with longer axial lengths, the amount of deviation corrections was smaller. In patients with shorter axial lengths, the corrections were bigger.</p><p>Krzizok et al. found that there was an inverse correlation between axial length and correction in deviation in faden operation in esotropia surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.90422-ref13">13</xref>] . In eyes with longer axial length, correction in deviation decreased.</p><p>A limitation of this study is that it does not include controls. But, it is understandable that to establish a control group is very difficult and time assuming and also there are some ethical issues.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Faden operations, unilaterally or bilaterally, on MR muscles with recession were a successful surgical treatment option that resulted in the reduction of the near and distance deviations in esotropia.</p><p>In eyes with shorter axial lengths, the decrease of postoperative deviations was more than longer axial lengths. The medial rectus width and the distance of medial rectus insertion to limbus had no effect on Faden surgery.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Availability of Data and Materials</title><p>The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Doğan, M., G&#246;kyiğit, B., Akar, S. and Yılmaz, O.F. (2019) Effects of Ocular Parameters on Medial Rectus Faden Operation with Recession for Esotropia. Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 7, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbm.2019.72005</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.90422-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wright, K.W. (2007) Color Atlas of Strabismus Surgery Strategies and Techniques. Springer, New York, Vol. 20, 200-201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cüppers, C. (1976) The So-Called “Fadenoperation.” ISecond Congress of the International Strabismological Association. Marseilles; Diffusion Générale de Librairie, 395-400.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akar, S., Gokyigit, B., Sayin, N., Demirok, A. and Yilmaz, O.F. (2013) Medial Rectus Faden Operations with or without Recession for Partially Accommodative Esotropia Associated with a High Accommodative Convergence to Accommodation Ratio. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>de Decker</surname><given-names> W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1981</year>)<article-title>The Faden Operation. When and How to Do It</article-title><source> Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of UK</source><volume> 101</volume>,<fpage> 264</fpage>-<lpage>270</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Clark, R.A., Isenberg, S.J., Rosenbaum, A.L., et al. (1999) Posterior Fixation Sutures: A Revised Mechanical Explanation for the Fadenoperation Based on Rectus Extraocular Muscle Pulleys. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 128, 702-714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00356-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khalifa, Y.M. (2011) Augmented Medial Rectus Recession, Medial Rectus Recession Plus Faden, and Slanted Medial Rectus Recession for Convergence Excess Esotropia. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 21, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.5301/EJO.2010.5225</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thouvenin, D.A., Sotiropoulos, M.C., Arne, J.L., et al. (2008) Esotropias That Totally Resolve under General Anesthesia Treated Exclusively with Bilateral Fadenoperation. Strabismus, 16, 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273970802505284</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gharabaghi, D. and Zanjani, L.K. (2006) Comparison of Results of Medial Rectus Muscle Recession Using Augmentation, Faden Procedure, and Slanted Recession in the Treatment of High Accommodative Convergence/Accommodation Ratio Esotropia. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 43, 91-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">von Noorden, G.K. (1982) An Alternative to Marginal Myotomy. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94, 285-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(82)90352-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christian, C.J., Biglan, A.W. and Josef, H.C. (2002) Surgery for Esotropia. Duane’s Clinical Ophthalmology on CD-Rom, 6: Ch. 84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mims 3rd</surname><given-names> J.L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1981</year>)<article-title>Medial Rectus Insertion Site in Congenital Esotropia</article-title><source> Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 181</fpage>-<lpage>186</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kushner, B.J., Lucchese, N.J. and Morton, G.V. (1989) The Influence of Axial Length on the Response to Strabismus Surgery. Arch Ophthalmol, 107, 1616-1618. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020694030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.90422-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krzizok, T., Graf, M. and Kaufmann, H. (1994) Effect of Bulbus Length of Reduction of Squint Angle after Suture Fixation. Ophthalmologe, 91, 68-76.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>