<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IJG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Journal of Geosciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8359</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ijg.2018.911038</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">IJG-88375</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Exploratory Potential for Gold Placer Deposits in the Coastal Range, BioB&#237;o Region, South-Central Chile
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fredy</surname><given-names>Stange</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sonia</surname><given-names>Helle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Santiago</surname><given-names>Collao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Departamento Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Instituto de Geología Económica Aplicada (GEA), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>11</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>635</fpage><lpage>657</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Many gold placers located in the Coastal Range of south-central Chile have been exploited commercially during the past decades; nevertheless and until now, there are not any exploration studies of these placers and their basement. In order to provide an overview of exploratory potential, the stream sediments that are part of several gold placers in the northwest area of the BioB&#237;o region are analyzed, which have been registered on the basis of empirical evidence from artisanal mining activities. The overview consist
  s
   of two goals: 1) determine the presence of auriferous occurrences (stream sediments and basement) and 2) identify potentially favorable areas to find gold placer deposits. Through optical microscopy this study characterized the metallic and non-metallic mineralogy of the basement, along with geochemical analyses of stream sediments and surrounding rocks of the placer deposits. The geochemical results show two sectors with high precious metal contents in sediments (up to 24 ppm of Au and 8 ppm of Ag) and two rocky outcrops with Au (757 and 41 ppb). Additionally, there are depressions in the study area that have received large amounts of sediments (reaching up to 170 m-thick), which are favorable places for the accumulation of auriferous sediments from nearby valleys due to the tectonic and structural conditions where they are located. Then, these results show an exploratory potential for gold placers and can be useful to delineate future exploration strategies in the Coastal Range of south-central Chile.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gold</kwd><kwd> Placer</kwd><kwd> Exploration</kwd><kwd> Coastal Range</kwd><kwd> South-Central Chile</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The National Gold Plan (Plan Aur&#237;fero Nacional de Chile) conducted by the Chilean National Mining Corporation (ENAMI) between years 1983-1987 allowed recognizing the gold placers along the country [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref1">1</xref>] , its depositional setting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref2">2</xref>] and grouped them into four categories: 1) placers related to Upper Jurassic-Lower Tertiary granitoids, 2) placers related to Paleozoic Metamorphic Basement and/or South Coastal Batholith, 3) placers related to quaternary moraines, and 4) placers located at oceanic beaches. The second category shows the placers distributed between the center and south of the country (~33˚S - 38˚S) along the Coastal Range (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>Evidence of gold occurrences in rocks of the Paleozoic basement in south-central Chile is very scarce; some of them are located near gold placers (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref3">3</xref>] ). For instance, a few tens of gold bearing quartz veins with thicknesses between 0.40 and 2 m hosted in the South Coastal Batholith (32˚30'S - 38˚S; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref4">4</xref>] ) are located</p><p>near the Marga Marga placer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref5">5</xref>] . In addition, areas within this intrusive body display anomalous Au values (up to 8 ppb; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref7">7</xref>] ). Banded Iron Formation (BIF) type deposits hosted in rocks of the Metamorphic Basement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref9">9</xref>] have been detected close to the Mahuilque gold placer (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>); these show Au contents (up to 0.36 ppm) mainly in metacherts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref3">3</xref>] and are similar to Au-rich BIF deposits of south-central Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Reviews by Pincheira et al. (1991) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref1">1</xref>] and Collao et al. (2000) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref11">11</xref>] in the BioB&#237;o region show a large number of gold placers (120), mainly hosted in modern alluvial and fluvial deposits in the Coastal Range. Some of them (20) have been classified empirically, from observations of local miners, as attractive for exploration (&gt;0.5 g/m<sup>3</sup>; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref11">11</xref>] ) and spatially related to the Metamorphic Basement and/or South Coastal Batholith [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref2">2</xref>] . This can be considered as empirical evidence to explore such placers within that geological context.</p><p>The gold placers within the Coastal Range of the BioB&#237;o region do not have a basic geological description of its outcrops or drill holes (e.g., stratigraphy, composition, shapes, chemical analyzes, etc.) and the reviews just show empirical evidence from artisanal mining activities. Then, as this area is practically unexplored, the study is oriented to provide an overview of exploratory potential for gold placers. This overview comprises two goals: 1) determine the presence of auriferous occurrences (stream sediments and basement) and 2) identify potentially favorable areas to find gold placer deposits. The data to achieve these goals were obtained from geological mapping, petrography of representative rocks, descriptions of eventual mineralizations, and geochemistry of rocks and stream sediments which are part of several gold placers hosted in fluvial deposits (16) located at one sector of the Coastal Range of south-central Chile (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) and the basement in which they are located.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Geological Setting</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Regional Geology</title><p>The oldest rocks in the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) constitute the Metamorphic Basement of the Coastal Range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref12">12</xref>] , which are interpreted as an accretionary complex of Carboniferous to late Triassic age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref14">14</xref>] . These rocks have been divided into two strips, the Western and Eastern Series [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref16">16</xref>] . The Western Series consists of mica schists, metabasites, metacherts and serpentinites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref15">15</xref>] , whereas the Eastern Series is composed of phyllites, slates, schists and gneisses with an increasing metamorphic grade towards the contact with Paleozoic intrusive rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref18">18</xref>] , showing biotite, andalusite and sillimanite zones in the same direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>The intrusive rocks are mainly grouped in the Permo-Carboniferous South Coastal Batholith [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref18">18</xref>] . Together with this intrusion, during the Permian, the tectonic erosion caused the removal of material from the accretionary complex [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref19">19</xref>] which led to the loss of a 100 km portion of land [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref16">16</xref>] . This batholith is composed of calc-alkaline granitoids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref21">21</xref>] , ranging from granodiorites and tonalites</p><p>(center) to granites (margins) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref15">15</xref>] , and minor amounts of microgranites and pegmatites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref4">4</xref>] . In addition, there are small outcrops of Upper Triassic plutonic rocks (Norian; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref17">17</xref>] <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), composed mostly of monzogranite (Hualp&#233;n Stock; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref17">17</xref>] ).</p><p>From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, Mesozoic to Cenozoic sedimentary rock sequences overlie the Upper Paleozoic plutonic and metamorphic rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref22">22</xref>] . The oldest unit, Santa Juana Formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref23">23</xref>] , is an Upper Triassic (Carnic; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref24">24</xref>] ) marine-continental rock sequence, deposited in a NW-SE basin during the initial breakup of Gondwana and the Mesozoic subduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref25">25</xref>] . The main lithologies are arkosic sandstones, shales and claystones, composed of sediments derived from Upper Paleozoic plutonic and metamorphic rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref24">24</xref>] . Upper Cretaceous (Maastrichtian; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref26">26</xref>] ) sedimentary marine rocks, represented by the Quiriquina Formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref27">27</xref>] , are composed of a basal transgressive conglomerate, fossiliferous sandstones and intercalations of conglomerate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref28">28</xref>] . The Cenozoic sedimentary cover comprises marine and continental deposits which are a product of transgression and regression episodes until the Quaternary, within a forearc basin over a continental shelf with epeirogenic movements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref22">22</xref>] . These deposits are included in a set of formations known as “Arauco Group”, mainly composed of sandstones, claystones and siltstones [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>The tectonic setting of the south-central Chile margin, characterized by the fast dextral-oblique (N77˚E) subduction of the Nazca oceanic plate beneath the South American continent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref30">30</xref>] , has kept relatively stable since the Pliocene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref31">31</xref>] . During the Pliocene-Quaternary, this configuration led to normal faulting with NE preferential orientation, together with uplift and marine regression in the coastal area of south-central Chile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref32">32</xref>] which, in turn, allowed the development of the BioB&#237;o and Andali&#233;n rivers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref33">33</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Drainage and Geomorphology</title><p>The studied placers, developed in the BioB&#237;o and Andali&#233;n basins (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), are hosted mainly in unconsolidated late Holocene sediments (gravel and sand) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref34">34</xref>] , which correspond to the current stream sediment deposits, with a maximum thickness of 20 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref34">34</xref>] .</p><p>The BioB&#237;o river has a drainage basin of 24,000 km<sup>2</sup> and a length of 380 km from the Andes to the coast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref35">35</xref>] . The hydric regime is pluvial and nival with flow rates of 700 to 1,300 m<sup>3</sup>/s; however, the lower course is completely pluvial with up to 3,000 m<sup>3</sup>/s during winter floods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] . Furthermore, this river does not have major lakes along its course which causes extreme sediment transport and creates sandbars close to the coast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>The Andali&#233;n river has a drainage basin located within the Coastal Range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] , with an area of 780 km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] . It is born at the confluence of the Po&#241;&#233;n and Curapalihue rivers, has a meandering path and a length of 36 km [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref37">37</xref>] . Its hydric regime is pluvial with winter floods and flow rates between 10 m<sup>3</sup>/s in summer and 300 m<sup>3</sup>/s in winter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] .</p><p>The most important physiographic unit is the Coastal Range. It is composed of intrusive and metamorphic rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref38">38</xref>] with average altitudes ranging from 150 to 300 m a.s.l. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref39">39</xref>] and slopes between 15˚ and 25˚ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref38">38</xref>] . Towards the south of the BioB&#237;o river, the Coastal Range is progressively raised by ENE-WSW faults in the Metamorphic Basement (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), from 300 to 650 m [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>Morphogenetically, the weather is a relevant factor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref38">38</xref>] . The differences in rainfall and temperature averages between winter (~350 mm and 9˚C; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] ) and summer (~50 mm and 18˚C; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref36">36</xref>] ) seasons induce erosion processes along the Coastal Range [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref41">41</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Sampling and Methodology</title><p>Sediment samples were collected along the thalweg of fluvial streams (~40 cm below the surface) during the summer months (January, February and March). A total of 132 samples were taken from these streams (each 200 m; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), with a volume of two liters per sample and particle size smaller than fine gravel (&lt;2 mm). These were concentrated gravimetrically using a Wilfley vibratory table to obtain the heavy fraction (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref42">42</xref>] ), dried in a muffle furnace at 40˚C, homogenized and divided with a riffle sample divider. In parallel, 30 rock chip samples were collected from outcrops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>), each of them equivalent to 5</p><p>kg, representative of ~30 m<sup>2</sup>, and homogeneous with respect to lithology, meteorization and leaching (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref44">44</xref>] ).</p><p>The mineralogy of the basement (12 standard transparent-polished sections) was identified by means of an Olympus BX40 optical microscope.</p><p>All the procedures mentioned previously were performed at the Departamento Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad de Concepci&#243;n, Chile.</p><p>Samples for geochemical analysis (sediments and rocks) were pulverized with a tungsten Heiko TI 200 mill and the sediment samples were analyzed at the Instituto de Geolog&#237;a Econ&#243;mica Aplicada (GEA), Universidad de Concepci&#243;n, Chile. As for the rock samples, they were analyzed at ACME laboratories, Santiago, Chile.</p><p>The chemical analysis of the drainage sediments was performed by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS; Hitachi Z-8100) for the determination of Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Au and Ag. For Cu, Pb and Zn, the samples were dissolved with HCl, followed by a fusion of the insoluble residue with lithium tetraborate. In the case of As, this was extracted by hydride generation (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref45">45</xref>] ). Au and Ag were preconcentrated by fire assay (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref46">46</xref>] ). The detection limits were: Cu, Pb and Zn: 12 ppm; Au: 0.02 ppm; As: 0.001 ppm; Ag: 0.2 ppm. The quality control was performed by means of internal laboratory materials, including standards, duplicates and blanks.</p><p>Rock samples were analyzed using induced coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), and in addition, Au was determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. For ICP-AES, a 0.5 g sub-sample was digested with 3 ml 3-1-2 HCl-HNO<sub>3</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>O leach at 95˚C for 1 h, and then diluted to 10 ml with water. For Au-AAS, a 10 g sub-sample was digested with aqua regia at 95˚C for 1 h, and then diluted to 100 ml with water. The detection limits were: Au: 0.5 ppb; As: 0.5 ppm; Hg: 0.01 ppm; Mo, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cd, Sb, Bi and Ag: 0.1 ppm. The quality control was performed by means of internal laboratory materials, including standards, duplicates and blanks.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Field Observations and Petrography</title><p>The principal lithologies in the study area are coarse grained biotite/amphibole- biotite granodiorites and coarse grained biotite granites of the South Coastal Batholith (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). These rocks are locally cut by quartz veins and aplite dikes, from 1 to 10 cm thick (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)). Thin sections show that the main minerals are plagioclases (slightly altered to sericite), K-feldspar (microcline slightly altered to clays), quartz, biotite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)) and locally epidote. Microdiorite xenoliths, sub-rounded and measuring 5 - 10 cm long, are also frequently present. Another common feature is the presence of pegmatite bodies, mainly composed of quartz, K-feldspar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(c)) and lesser amounts of muscovite and biotite altered to chlorite, with local occurrence of almandine garnet and tourmaline (dark brown and polychrome). Thin sections of a pegmatite body</p><p>located close to the Po&#241;&#233;n placer (“Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite”) show quartz and feldspar (plagioclase and microcline) as major components, commonly displaying a graphic intergrowth, with minor amounts of tourmaline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(d)). [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref47">47</xref>] indicates the presence of orthoclase, plagioclase, quartz (smoked and white), micas (biotite and muscovite), besides meta-autunite, chlorite, limonites, clays and traces of rankachite (CaFeV<sub>4</sub>W<sub>8</sub>O<sub>36</sub>∙12(H<sub>2</sub>O)).</p><p>In the Quilacoya area, Triassic sedimentary rocks are cut by quartz veins (up to 10 cm thick) of similar orientation to the stratification, and some orthogonals as part of the same system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)), with quartz crystals oriented perpendicularly to the walls of each vein (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c)). These veins are present at the contact zone between the South Coastal Batholith and the sedimentary rocks (Santa Juana Formation), with strikes varying from N60˚W to N75˚W and dips ranging from 60˚SW to sub-vertical. In thin sections of quartz veins and adjacent wall rock, effects of deformation such as fracturing and recrystallization are observed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(d)). The sedimentary rocks around these veins are moderately to strongly argilized, showing alteration halos that reach up to 20 cm, along with limonites (mainly goethitic and minor hematitic; ~5%) and pyrite boxworks (1% - 2%), also observed in the quartz veins (~1%; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a)).</p><p>Pyrite and chalcopyrite (&lt;1%) and occasionally Fe-Ti oxides (ilmenite) have</p><p>been observed only in the Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite. Pyrite occurs as microveinlets, forming a partial fill along cleavages of biotite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)) and between crystals of this mineral (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c)), while ilmenite, rutile, sphene, pyrite and lesser amounts of chalcopyrite occur as anhedral disseminated grains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(d)) in K-feldspar slightly altered to sericite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(e)). Chalcopyrite also occurs as subhedral disseminated grains, locally in contact with muscovite crystals (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(f)).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Geochemistry of Rocks and Sediments</title><p>Most of the rock chip samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) were obtained from unmineralized unaltered areas in the South Coastal Batholith, including pegmatite bodies (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In addition, some quartz veins were collected (placer 11 and 16; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), but not included in the statistical results. In the case of stream sediment samples, analyzes were conducted on heavy mineral concentrates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Basic statistical results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> for intrusive rocks (granodiorites and granites), pegmatites, quartz veins and sediment concentrates show the number of cases, mean, range, standard deviation and global (world) mean value ranges for intrusive rocks referenced in the same table.</p><p>It is not possible to compare the elements found in the sediments with the results collected from rocks given that the former might have different and unknown sources. This is why the following description is made in order to present the metallic content in both cases.</p><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Rocks</title><p>Molybdenum. Samples of intrusive rocks and pegmatites have mean values (0.28 and 0.49 ppm, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) lower than the global mean range (1.0 - 1.5 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Although, it must be noted that a significant number of samples have Mo contents near to the detection limit (0.1 ppm) or below this. The highest value is observed close to the placer 4 (Vertiente 8: 1.8 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Copper. The mean values for samples from intrusive rocks (3.65 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and pegmatites (18.85 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) are below the global mean range (30 - 72 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The highest values are observed in the Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite (U5-500: &gt; 10,000 ppm; U2X-400: 215 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Lead. Rock samples of the South Coastal Batholith have a mean value (14.43 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) within the global mean range (4 - 15 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Nevertheless, the mean value for pegmatites (106.54 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is considerably higher than the global mean range, where the highest values are observed close to the placer 8 (U5-500: 802.9 ppm, U2X-400: 590.7 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Zinc. The mean value for samples from the intrusive rocks (28.26 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is below the global mean range (60 - 94 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), while the samples from pegmatites along the South Coastal Batholith have a mean value considerably higher (666.3 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) than this range, with the highest value in the Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite (U5-500: 9,522 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Nickel. Most of the samples from the intrusive rocks have low Ni contents with a mean value (2.37 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) below the global mean range (4.5 - 15 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). In the case of pegmatites, these have a mean value within the global range, with the exception of one sample above this range (U5-500: 119.4 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Content of Mo, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, As, Cd, Sb, Bi, Ag, Au and Hg in surrounding rocks of the studied placers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mo (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ni (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >As (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cd (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bi (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ag (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Au (ppb)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hg (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QC-1C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CL-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TN-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P5-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CC-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vertiente 8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vertiente 9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vertiente 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F-1C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >QC-1V</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FP-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po&#241;&#233;n 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po&#241;&#233;n 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po&#241;&#233;n 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Po&#241;&#233;n 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U2X-400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >590.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >424.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >756.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U3-245</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >U5-500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;10,000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >802.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9,522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RI-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RI-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RL-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(b)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CP-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Y-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >RH-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >HQ-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(c)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Q-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>L: Lithology; (a) Granodiorite, (b) Pegmatite, (c) Granite, (d) Quartz vein.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Content of Cu, Pb, Zn, As, Ag and Au in concentrated sediments of the studied placers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N˚</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Geological setting</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >As (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ag (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Au (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-(7a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.020</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-(8a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.053</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-(9a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.353</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12-(1a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.090</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-(14a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10-(5a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metamorphic Basement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.279</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10-(7a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metamorphic Basement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10-(1a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metamorphic Basement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Metamorphic Basement</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.044</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7-(5a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-(3a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-(12a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2-(13a)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Arsenic. The mean value for samples from the intrusive rocks of the South Coastal Batholith (3.15 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is slightly higher than the global mean range (1.5 - 2.0 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Pegmatites have a mean value (31.5 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) considerably higher than the range of the global values, with the highest value in the Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite (U2X-400: 424.3 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Bismuth. Samples from intrusive rocks and pegmatites have mean values (0.27 ppm and 0.55 ppm, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) higher than the global mean range (0.01 - 0.04 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The highest value is observed close to the placer 3 (TN-1: 1.9 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), for intrusive rock samples, and close to the placer 8 (U2X-400: 5.1 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), for samples from pegmatites.</p><p>Gold. The mean value for samples from intrusive rocks (2.16 ppb; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is below the global mean range (3.2 - 4.5 ppb; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>); however, local Au contents above this range are observed in the proximities of the placers 1, 5 and 13 (QC-1C: 7.5 ppb; P-1: 7.8 ppb and CP-1: 5.1 ppb, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The mean value for samples from pegmatites (52.58 ppb; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is considerably higher than the global range, where the highest value can be found in the Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite (U2X-400: 756.7 ppb; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Geochemical results of rock chip and concentrated sediment samples from the study area</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Element (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >N</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Range (a)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean value (b)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard Deviation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Global mean values (c)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Intrusive rocks, South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 - 1.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 - 11.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 - 30.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 - 15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60 - 94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 - 8.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5-15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 - 6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 - 2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01-0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au (e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-7.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2 - 4.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Pegmatites, South Coastal Batholith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1-ad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2 - 802.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >106.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >235.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-9,522</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >666.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2367.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 - 119.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 - 424.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au (e)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-756.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sediments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 - 68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >As</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018 - 0.353</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >bd-23.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>(a) bd: below detection limit, ad: above upper detection limit. Elements with ≥50% of values below detection limit are excluded (in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). (b) Mean values were calculated including values below detection limit, considering those as half the detection limit. (c) Global mean value ranges were compiled from the following references: [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref59">59</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref61">61</xref>] . (d) One analysis above upper detection limit is excluded (sample U5-500: &gt; 10,000 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). (e) In ppb.</p><p>Additionally to the intrusive rocks and pegmatites, high concentrations of Au and As were locally detected in quartz veins close to the Quilacoya placer (Q-1: 40.9 ppb and 20.9 ppm, respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Sediments</title><p>Copper. Most sediment samples (15; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) have Cu contents below the mean value (30 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Concentrations above the mean value are observed in sediments from the placers 1, 2, 3, 10, 13 and 16 (samples 32-(3a), 24-(3a), 21-(3a), 10-(5a), 10-(3a) and 2-(12a), respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value is detected in the sample 24-(3a) (131 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Lead. Most samples (16; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) have Pb contents below the detection limit; therefore, these results are not presented in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Concentrations above the detection limit are observed in sediments from the placers 1, 3, 5 and 8 (samples 32-(3a), 21-(3a), 16-(3a) and 12-(1a), respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value is detected in the sample 21-(3a) (18 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Zinc. Half of these deposits studied have Zn contents above the mean value (26.7 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), which is similar to the copper mean value (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Concentrations above the mean value are observed in sediments from the placers 3, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16 (samples 21-(3a), 12-(1a), 10-(5a), 10-(7a), 10-(1a), 10-(3a), 7-(5a) and 2-(12a), respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value is detected in the sample 10-(3a) (68 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Arsenic. Concentrations of this element are considerably lower than the others (mean value: 0.07 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Concentrations above the mean value are observed in sediments from the placers 4 {4-(7a)}, 8 {4-(9a), 12-(1a)}, 9 {4-(14a)} and 10 {10-(5a)} (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value is detected in the sample 4-(9a) (0.353 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Silver. Most sediment samples (17; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) have Ag contents below the detection limit; therefore, these results are not presented in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Concentrations above the detection limit are observed in sediments from the placers 3, 8 and 16 (samples 21-(3a), 12-(1a) and 2-(12a), respectively; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value is detected in the sample 2-(12a) (8.14 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Gold. Most samples have Au contents above the detection limit (17; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), three of them are considerably higher than the mean value (1.98 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) and are observed in the placers 3 {21-(3a)} and 8 {4-(9a), 12-(1a)} (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value is detected in the sample 12-(1a) (23.86 ppm; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion: Potential Areas for Gold Placer Deposits</title><p>In south-central Chile, the most relevant factors that can affect the sediment mobilization dynamics in the drainage basins are: precipitations, water flow, vegetation cover, geomorphology and tectonic environment (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref50">50</xref>] ).</p><p>Due to the tectonic conditions dating back to the Pliocene, the area where the basins of Andali&#233;n and BioB&#237;o rivers are located have been subject to an important uplift [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref31">31</xref>] at average rates of 0.2 mm/yr [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref19">19</xref>] , producing disequilibrium profiles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref30">30</xref>] and rapid incision along the rivers (rates of 0.43 mm/yr; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref51">51</xref>] ); therefore, in these basins a high erosion rate would be expected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref52">52</xref>] . In the study area, decadal erosion rates have been estimated from suspended sediments of the BioBio river basin, which were low (0.03 - 0.08 mm/yr; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref52">52</xref>] ). However, the data currently available, obtained by surficial sampling (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref53">53</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref54">54</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref52">52</xref>] ), does not allow to estimate the bed load and to calculate the ratio between suspended sediment concentration and total sedimentary load; therefore, the erosion rates were underestimated. In the BioB&#237;o basin, most erosion processes are focused on high frequency-medium magnitude events (e.g., storms or heavy rainfall), whereas low frequency-high magnitude events (e.g., earthquakes) do not alter the sedimentary flow considerably [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref54">54</xref>] . It has been observed that the suspended sediments are mobilized during heavy rainfall, always under conditions of low percentage of green vegetation cover [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref52">52</xref>] , whereas after an earthquake (e.g., the M<sub>w</sub> 8.8 Maule earthquake, 27 February 2010) the mobilization of sediments depend mainly on the slope (average of 12˚) and on connectivity between hillslopes and rivers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref52">52</xref>] .</p><p>The normal water flow in the studied basins can be interrupted by flood events, mainly due to heavy rainfall during the winter months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref37">37</xref>] , and as a consequence, gold extraction has been made during these months or after heavy rains in past centuries, for example in the Hualqui and Quilacoya placers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref11">11</xref>] . These weather conditions probably have produced constant recycling of sediments with detrital gold from the hillslopes to the modern streams (i.e., gold from pre-existing placers; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref56">56</xref>] ). In addition, although the basement presents discontinuous outcrops, in most of the studied basins this is located a few meters underneath the surface [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref57">57</xref>] , allowing that some gold occurrences would be exposed to the erosion by flooding from watercourses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p><p>Geochemical analyses of rock samples reveal that the mean values of pegmatites are higher than those of the intrusive rocks, and in certain cases (Pb, Zn, As, Bi and Au) markedly above the global mean range (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), such is the case of the Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(c)). Considering that this body is occasionally eroded by the flooding of the adjacent river, the gold from its outcrop is likely to have fed, at least partially, the nearby placer. Farther south, in the BioB&#237;o basin, quartz veins close to the Quilacoya placer show high Au and As contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), which makes it likely for this placer deposit to contain gold derived from the erosion of the aforementioned veins by the adjacent river (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b)). Then, part of the liberated particles from these occurrences was probably subjected to a short transport.</p><p>Given that the uplift, exhumation and erosion processes have affected the Coastal Range of south-central Chile from the Pliocene to the present (e.g., [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref53">53</xref>] ), it is probably that the recycling of gold from pre-existing placer deposits to the modern rivers had provided more auriferous sediments than the occasional erosion of the basement. Some geoforms constitute temporary sedimentary deposits in the studied fluvial systems (e.g., alluvial fans, flood plains, terraces and bars); however, heavy rainfall and persistent uplift in this region of the country would impede the conservation of large accumulations of auriferous sediments.</p><p>During the Pliocene and Pleistocene, the Concepci&#243;n area would have been affected by tectonic phenomena that gave origin to faults with block displacements, which in turn, resulted in a normal fault system with NE preferential orientation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) that continues to be active [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref62">62</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref63">63</xref>] . Such faults limited uplifted blocks that currently form hills between Concepci&#243;n and Talcahuano and grabens filled with sediments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(b)).</p><p>These depressions or structural traps (e.g., New Zeland; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref65">65</xref>] and their references) have been subject to differential uplift along the faults on its limits, causing erosion of the basement and sediments from hillslopes. Therefore, they not only could have received auriferous sediments transported by the BioB&#237;o and Andali&#233;n rivers but also gold from possibles occurrences in the basement and pre-existing placer deposits.</p><p>The area covered by these depressions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) and the thickness of its sediments (up to 170 m; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>(a)), allow to affirm that they were favorable places for the accumulation and conservation of large volumes of sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88375-ref66">66</xref>] , which would be potentially auriferous considering that the stream sediments from the BioB&#237;o and Andali&#233;n basins have detrital gold that could have been accumulated within them, possibly since the Pliocene. Then, these structural traps would be potentially attractive as exploration targets in the study area.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>Through geochemical analyses this research was able to identify the auriferous</p><p>potential of fluvial placers formed by active sediments in Andalien’s basin (Au: Puente 6, Confluencia; Au &#177; Ag: Puente 5, Po&#241;&#233;n) and Biob&#237;o’s lower basin (Au: Hualqui; Ag &#177; Au: Quilacoya). Moreover, auriferous occurrences are observed in the basement, one of them in the South Coastal Batholith (Po&#241;&#233;n pegmatite) and the other one in the contact zone between the latter and sedimentary rocks of the Santa Juana Formation (quartz veins in Quilacoya).</p><p>There are zones within the studied basins with placer exploration potential due to their tectonic and structural conditions that favor the accumulation of auriferous sediments from nearby valleys. These are structurally controlled depressions in the area of Concepci&#243;n which have received large amounts of sediments (reaching up to 170 m-thick). Therefore, the exploration of placers in the Coastal Range of south-central Chile should consider drainage systems that have been subject to tectonic and structural processes which are similar to those registered in the Andali&#233;n and BioB&#237;o rivers, thus allowing the development of depressions filled with sediments from auriferous valleys.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by Universidad de Concepci&#243;n, DIUC 209025036-1.0 project. We are grateful to Veronica Pineda for her valuable help in the preparation of sediment samples and Gerardo Flores for his logistical assistance during sampling (Universidad de Concepci&#243;n). We also express our gratitude to Roberto Oyarzun (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain) and one anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments and suggestions.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Stange, F., Helle, S. and Collao, S. (2018) Exploratory Potential for Gold Placer Deposits in the Coastal Range, BioB&#237;o Region, South-Central Chile. International Journal of Geosciences, 9, 635-657. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2018.911038</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.88375-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pincheira, M., Jaramillo, E. and Blanco, N. (1991) Evaluación preliminar de los placeres auríferos de la VIII Región, Chile. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 65 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greiner, G. (1991) Características y distribución de los placeres auríferos de Chile. Symposium Internacional Sur les Gisements Alluviaux d’Or, La Paz, 39-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyarzún, R. and Helle, S. (1984) Una posible guía de prospección aurífera en rocas del basamento metamórfico de Chile Central-Sur. Minerales, 39, 19-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hervé, F., Godoy, E., Parada, M.A., Ramos, V., Rapela, C., Mpodozis, C. and Davidson, J. (1987) A general view on the Chilean-Argentine Andes, with Emphasis on Their Early History. Circum Pacific Orogenic Belts and the Evolution of the Pacific Ocean Basin, Geodynamics Series, 18, 97-114. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1029/GD018p0097</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gonzalez, I. (1991) Sedimentología y mineralogía de placeres auríferos y su relación con yacimientos hidrotermales. Symposium Internacional Sur les Gisements Alluviaux d’Or, La Paz, 61-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ruiz, C. and Peebles, F. (1988) Geología, Distribución y Génesis de los yacimientos metalíferos chilenos. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, 334 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peebles, F. and Gonzalez, I. (1991) Placeres auríferos del Litoral Central de Chile. Symposium Internacional Sur les Gisements Alluviaux d’Or, La Paz, 53-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collao, S. and Alfaro, G. (1982) Mineralización sulfurada de hierro, cobre y zinc en la Cordillera de la Costa, sur de Chile. Revista Geológica de Chile, 15, 41-47.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyarzún, R., Clemmey, H. and Collao, S. (1984) Chemical Characteristics of the Nahuelbuta Mountains Banded iron Formation, Southern-Central Chile. Journal of the Japanese Association of Mineralogists, Petrologists and Economic Geologists, 79, 146-156. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.2465/ganko1941.79.146</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anhaeusser</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1976</year>)<article-title>The Nature and Distribution of Archean Gold Mineralization in Southern Africa</article-title><source> Minerals Science and Engineering</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 47</fpage>-<lpage>84</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collao, S., Alfaro, G., Cecioni, A., González, A. and Quinzio, A. (2000) Evaluación de los Recursos Metálicos de la Región del BioBío, Chile. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 207 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguirre, L., Hervé, F. and Godoy, E. (1972) Distribution of Metamorphic Facies in Chile-An outline. Krystalinikum, 9, 7-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duhart, P., McDonough, M., Mu&amp;ntilde;oz, J., Martin, M. and Villeneuve, M. (2001) El complejo metamórfico Bahía Mansa en la Cordillera de la Costa del centro-sur de Chile (39°30'-42°00'S): Geocronología K-Ar, 40Ar/39Ar y U-Pb e implicancias en la evolución del margen sur-occidental de Gondwana. Revista Geológica de Chile, 28, 179-208. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-02082001000200003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Willner, A.P., Glodny, J., Gerya, T.V., Godoy, E. and Massonne, H. (2004) A Counterclockwise PTt-Path in High Pressure-Low Temperature Rocks from the Coastal Cordillera Accretionary Complex of South Central Chile: Constraints for the Earliest Stage of Subduction Mass Flow. Lithos, 73, 283-310.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lithos.2004.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hervé, F. (1977) Petrology of the Crystalline Basement of the Nahuelbuta Mountains, South-Central Chile. In: Ishikawa, T. and Aguirre, L., Eds., Comparative Studies on the Geology of the Circum-Pacific Orogenic Belt in Japan and Chile, Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science, London, 1-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Willner, A.P. (2005) Pressure-Temperature Evolution of an Upper Paleozoic Paired Metamorphic Belt in Central Chile (34°-35°30’S). Journal of Petrology, 46, 1805-1833.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/egi035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Creixell, C., Lucassen, F., Franz, G., Vásquez, P. and Figueroa, O. (2002) Petrology of the Hualpén Stock: Evidence of Late Triassic Epizonal Plutonism at the Western Margin of Gondwana (36°45’S, 73°10’W). International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics, Toulouse, Vol. 5, 167-170.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hervé, F., Munizaga, F., Parada, M.A., Brook, M., Pankhurst, R.J., Snelling, N.J. and Drake, R. (1988) Granitoids of the Coast Range of Central Chile: Geochronology and Geologic Setting. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 1, 185-194.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-9811(88)90036-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glodny, J., Echtler, H., Collao, S., Ardiles, M., Burón, P. and Figueroa, O. (2008) Differential Late Paleozoic Active Margin Evolution in South-Central Chile (37°-40°S)—The Lanalhue Fault Zone. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 26, 397-411. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2008.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hervé</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1988</year>)<article-title>Late Paleozoic Subduction and Accretion in Southern Chile</article-title><source> Episodes</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 183</fpage>-<lpage>188</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hervé, F. (1994) The Southern Andes between 39° and 44°S Latitude: The Geological Signature of a Transpressive Tectonic Regime Related to a Magmatic Arc. In: Reutter, K.J., Scheuber, E. and Wigger, P.J., Eds., Tectonics of the Southern Central Andes, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 243-248.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77353-2_17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frutos, J. and Cisternas, M. (1994) Evolución tectónica de la Cuenca Terciaria de los Andes del Sur de Chile (37°30’-40°30’ lat. S.). Congreso Geológico Chileno, Concepción, Vol. 7, 32-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferraris, F. (1981) Avance geológico Hoja Los ángeles-Angol, Región del Bío-Bío. Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas, Santiago, Vol. 5, 26 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nielsen, S. (2005) The Triassic Santa Juana Formation at the Lower Biobío River, South-Central Chile. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 19, 547-562.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2005.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rapela, C.W. and Pankhurst, R.J. (1992) The Granites of Northern Patagonia and the Gastre Fault System in Relation to the Break-Up of Gondwana. Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 68, 209-220.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1992.068.01.13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salazar, C., Stinnesbeck, W. and Quinzio-Sinn, L.A. (2010) Ammonites from the Maastrichtian (Upper Cretaceous) Quiriquina Formation in Central Chile. Neues Jahrbuch Geologie und Pal&amp;auml;ontologie Abhandlungen, 257, 181-236.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1127/0077-7749/2010/0072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biró, L. (1982) Revisión y redefinición de los “Estratos de Quiriquina”, Campaniano-Maastrichtiano, en su localidad tipo en la Isla Quiriquina, 36°35’S, Chile, Sudamérica, con un perfil complementario en Cocholhue. Congreso Geológico Chileno, Concepción, Vol. 3, 29-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Pineda, V. (1986) Evolución paleogeográfica de la cuenca sedimentaria Cretácico-Terciaria de Arauco. In: Frutos, J., Oyarzún, R. and Pincheira, M., Eds., Geología y recursos minerales de Chile, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 375-390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elgueta, S. and Arcos, R. (1993) Geología y modelo de sedimentación de la secuencia Cretácico-Terciaria de la Cuenca de Arauco. Empresa Nacional del Petróleo, Santiago, 32 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rehak, K., Strecker, M.R. and Echtler, H.P. (2008) Morphotectonic Segmentation of an Active Forearc, 37°-41°S, Chile. Geomorphology, 94, 98-116.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Melnick, D., Bookhagen, B., Echtler, H. and Strecker, M. (2006) Coastal Deformation and Great Subduction Earthquakes, Isla Santa María, Chile (37°S). Geological Society of America Bulletin, 118, 17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quezada, J., Fernández, A., Martínez, C., Pineda, V., Jaque, E. and Isla, F. (2009) Alzamiento holoceno en el litoral del Golfo de Arauco (37°S) y su relación con los terremotos de subducción. Congreso Geológico Chileno, Santiago, Vol. 12, 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">García, Y. (2004) Aplicación de los métodos círculo de Mohr y programa Reactiva 2.4 en el análisis del stress en las estructuras mayores del área de la ciudad de Concepción, Región del Bío-Bío, Chile. Memoria para optar al Título de Geólogo (Unpublished), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 119 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gajardo, A. (1981) Avance geológico Hoja Concepción-Chillán, Región del Bío-Bío. Instituto de Investigaciones Geológicas, Santiago, Vol. 4, 32 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Galli, C. (1967) Geología Urbana y suelo de fundación de Concepción y Talcahuano, Chile. Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 248 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dirección General de Aguas (DGA) (2004) Diagnóstico y clasificación de los cursos de agua según objetivos de calidad, cuenca del rio BioBío, Chile. Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Santiago, 185 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niemeyer, H. (1981) Hoyas Hidrográficas de Chile: Octava Región. Dirección General de Aguas (DGA), Centro de Estudios de los Recursos Hídricos, Santiago, 41 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pe&amp;ntilde;a</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Geomorfología de la ribera norte del rio Biobío en su curso inferior. Limitaciones y potencialidades del área</article-title><source> Revista de Geografía Norte Grande</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 27</fpage>-<lpage>33</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">González, L., Mardones, M., Silva, A. and Campos, E. (1999) Hidrogeoquímica y comportamiento del agua subterránea en la cuenca del río Claro, Región del Biobío, Chile. Revista Geológica de Chile, 26, 145-157.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-02081999000200001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Mardones, M. (2005) La Cordillera de la Costa: Caracterización Físico-Ambiental y Regiones Morfoestructurales. In: Smith-Ramírez, C., Armesto, J. and Valdovinos, C., Eds., Historia, Biodiversidad y Ecología de los Bosques Costeros de Chile, Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, 39-59.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Endlicher, W. (1985) Geokologische Untersuchungen zur Landschaftsdegradation im Küstenbergland von Concepción (Chile). Geowissenshaftlichen Fakultat der Universitat Freiburg, Freiburg, 330 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Burt, R.O. (1987) Gravity Concentration Methods. In: Yarar, B. and Dogan, Z.M., Eds., Mineral Processing Design, Springer, Berlin, 106-137.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3549-5_5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cruzat</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1984</year>)<article-title>Prospección geoquímica aplicada a yacimientos de oro</article-title><source> Revista Geológica de Chile</source><volume> 21</volume>,<fpage> 53</fpage>-<lpage>75</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wager, L. and Brown, G. (1960) Collection and Preparation of Materials for Analysis. In: Smales, A. and Wager, L., Eds., Methods in Geochemistry, Interscience, New York, 4-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nakahara</surname><given-names> T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1991</year>)<article-title>Advances in Atomic Spectroscopy</article-title><source> Spectrochimica Acta Reviews</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 95</fpage>-<lpage>109</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fletcher, W.K. and Day, S.J. (1987) Determination of Gold in Heavy-Mineral Concentrates: Fire Assay and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (FA-AAS) versus Instrumental Neutro Activation Analysis (INAA). British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Paper 1988-1, 509-510.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Collao, S., González, L. and Flores, G. (2009) Mineralización de Uranio en Afloramiento Pegmatítico, VIII Región del Bio Bío, Chile. Congreso Geológico Chileno, Santiago, Vol. 12, 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Antinao, J.L. and Gosse, J. (2008) Large Rockslides in the Southern Central Andes of Chile (32-34.5°S): Tectonic Control and Significance for Quaternary Landscape Evolution. Geomorphology, 204, 117-133.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carretier, S., Pepin, E., Farías, M., Guyot, J.L., Hérail, G., Escobar, F. and Charrier, R. (2009) Relaciones entre tasa de erosión moderna, sismicidad, clima, vegetación y topografía en Chile Central (27°-40°S). Congreso Geológico Chileno, Santiago, Vol. 12, 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolorza, V., Carretier, S. and Pinto, L. (2012) Descarga de sedimentos fluviales en la Cuenca del Río Biobío: Una aproximación a la erosión integrada de cuenca. Congreso Geológico Chileno, Antofagasta, Vol. 13, 3 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rehak, K., Niedermann, S., Preusser, F., Strecker, M. and Echtler, H. (2010) Late Pleistocene Landscape Evolution in South-Central Chile Constrained by Luminescence and Stable Cosmogenic Nuclide Dating. The Geological Society of America Bulletin, 122, 1235-1247. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/B26545.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolorza, V. (2015) Magnitud y dinámica de la erosión integrada de cuenca en el rio BioBío. Tesis para optar al Grado de Doctor en Ciencias Mención Geología (Unpublished), Universidad de Chile, 196 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Carretier, S., Tolorza, V., Rodríguez, M.P., Pepin, E., Aguilar, G., Regard, V., Martinod, J., Riquelme, R., Bonnet, S., Brichau, S., Hérail, G., Pinto, L., Farías, M., Charrier, R. and Guyot, J.L. (2014) Erosion in the Chilean Andes between 27°S and 39°S: Tectonic, Climatic and Geomorphic Control. In: Sepúlveda, S.A., Giambiagi, L.B., Moreiras, S.M., Pinto, L., Tunik, M., Hoke, G.D. and Farías, M., Eds., Geodynamic Processes in the Andes of Central Chile and Argentina, Geological Society, Special Publication, London, 399, 401-418. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1144/SP399.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tolorza, V., Carretier, S., Andermann, C., Ortega-Culaciati, F., Pinto, L. and Mardones, M. (2014) Contrasting Mountain and Piedmont Dynamics of Sediment Discharge Associated with Groundwater Storage Variation in the Biobío River. Journal of Geophysical Research, 119, 2730-2753. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levson, V.M. and Giles, T.R. (1991) Stratigraphy and Geologic Setting of Gold Placers in the Cariboo Mining District. British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Paper 1991-1, 331-344.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">James, L.A. (1999) Time and the Persistence of Alluvium: River Engineering, Fluvial Geomorphology, and Mining Sediment in California. Geomorphology, 31, 265-290.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00084-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dirección General de Aguas (DGA) (2012) Estudio Hidrogeológico Cuenca Biobío, Chile. Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Santiago, 166 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Govett, G.J.S. (1983) Rock Geochemistry in Mineral Exploration. In: Handbook of Exploration Geochemistry, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York, 461 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Lueth, V.W. (1999) Bismuth: Element and Geochemistry. In: Marshall, C.P. and Fairbridge, R.W., Eds., Encyclopedia of Geochemistry, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin, 43-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Townley, B., Maksaev, V., Palacios, C., Lahsen, A. and Parada, M.A. (2000) Base and Precious Metals Geochemistry of Rock Units of the Mainland Aysén Region, Chilean Patagonia. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 68, 21-46.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-6742(99)00056-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turekian, K.K. and Wedepohl, K.H. (1961) Distribution of the Elements in Some Major Units of the Earth’s Crust. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 72, 175-192. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72[175:DOTEIS]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Galli</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1968</year>)<article-title>Algunos aspectos de la geología del área de Concepción</article-title><source> Revista del IDIEM</source><volume> 7</volume>,<fpage> 57</fpage>-<lpage>61</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quezada, J. (1996) Geología urbana y ambiental de la ciudad de Concepción. Memoria para optar al Título de Geólogo (Unpublished), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, 143 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vivallos, J., Ramírez, P. and Fonseca, A. (2010) Microzonificación sísmica de la ciudad de Concepción. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Carta Geológica de Chile (escala 1:20.000), Serie Geología Ambiental 12, Santiago, 3 mapas.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kerr, L.C., Craw, D., Norris, R.J., Youngson, J.H. and Wopereis, P. (2000) Structure, Geomorphology, and Gold Concentration in the Nokomai Valley, Southland, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 43, 425-433.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2000.9514899</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramirez, P. and Vivallos, J. (2009) Microzonificación sísmica de la ciudad de Concepción Chile. Congreso Geológico Chileno, Santiago, Vol. 12, 4 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88375-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cecioni, A. and Quezada, J. (1994) Sintesis preliminar de la geología urbana de Concepción. Congreso Geológico Chileno, Concepción, Vol. 7, 595-599.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>