<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2018.610178</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-88051</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Existence of Solutions to a Viscous Thin Film Equation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yue</surname><given-names>Qiu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bo</surname><given-names>Liang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Foundation Building, 765 Brownlow Hill, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Science, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>10</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>2119</fpage><lpage>2126</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  A fourth-order degenerate parabolic equation with a viscous term: 
  <img src="Edit_34a08544-83a1-4c7d-8c8c-b12dd5c6c72e.bmp" alt="" />
  
   is studied with the initial-boundary conditions u<sub>x</sub>=w<sub>x</sub>=0
  
   on {-1,1}&#215;(0,T)
  
  , u(x,0)=u<sub>0</sub>(x)
  
   in (-1,1)
  
  . It can be taken as a thin film equation or a Cahn-Hilliard equation with a degenerate mobility. The entropy functional method is introduced to overcome the difficulties that arise from the degenerate mobility m(u)
  
   and the viscosity term. The existence of nonnegative weak solution is obtained.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fourth-Order Degenerate Parabolic</kwd><kwd> Thin Film Equation</kwd><kwd> Cahn-Hilliard Equation</kwd><kwd> Entropy Functional</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, the research of nonlinear fourth-order degenerate parabolic equations has become an interesting topic. The typical examples include the Cahn-Hilliard equation and the thin film equation. The Cahn-Hilliard equation can describe the evolution of a conserved concentration field during phase separation. It (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref1">1</xref>] ) has the form u t + ∇ ⋅ ( k ∇ ( ε 2 Δ u + A ′ ( u ) ) ) = 0 where the constants k, A, ε 2 denote the atomic mobility, the free energy, the parameter proportional to the interface energy respectively and − ( ε 2 Δ u + A ′ ( u ) ) is a kind of chemical potential. For the existence and the properties of solutions, Elliott, Zheng and Garcke (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref3">3</xref>] ) have studied this equation with a linear and a degenerate mobility respectively. Xu, Zhou, Liang and Zheng (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref6">6</xref>] ) have applied the semi-discrete method to obtain the existence and stability results to this model with a gradient mobility.</p><p>The thin film equation can analyze the motion of a very thin layer of viscous incompressible fluids along an inclined plane or model the fluid flows such as draining of foams and the movement of contact lenses. The thin film equation belongs to a class of fourth order degenerate parabolic equations (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref7">7</xref>] ) and the first mathematic result, the existence and nonnegativity of weak solutions, are given by Bernis and Friedman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref8">8</xref>] to the equation u t + ( u n u x x x ) x = 0 . The thin film equation with a second-order diffusion term was studied by Bertozzi and Pugh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref9">9</xref>] . Moreover, for a generalized thin-film equation with period boundary in multidimensional space, Boutat et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref10">10</xref>] obtained its existence. For other results, the readers may refer to the papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>In this paper, we study the following initial and boundary value problems for the viscous thin film equation:</p><p>{ u t − ( m ( u ) w x ) x = 0     in     Q T , w = − u x x + ν u t     in     Q T , u x = w x = 0     on     Γ , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) , (1)</p><p>where T &gt; 0 , m ( u ) = u , Ω = ( − 1 , 1 ) , Q T = Ω &#215; ( 0 , T ) and Γ = ∂ Ω &#215; ( 0 , T ) .</p><p>Formally, if we substitute the second equation into the first one, we can get another form for this question:</p><p>{ u t + ( m ( u ) ( u x x − ν u t ) x ) x = 0     in     Q T , u x = u x x x = 0     on     Γ , u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) . (2)</p><p>Our main result is the following theorems.</p><p>Theorem 1. Let u 0 ∈ L 2 ( Ω ) and ν &gt; 0 . Then there exists at least one pair ( u , w ) of (1) satisfying</p><p>1) u ∈ L ∞ ( 0 , T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) ∩ L 2 ( 0 , T ; H 2 ( Ω ) ) ∩ C ( [ 0 , T ] ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) , w ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) u t ∈ L 2 ( Q T ) ;</p><p>2) For any test function ϕ ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) , it has</p><p>∬ Q T u t ϕ d x d t + ∬ Q T u w x ϕ x d x d t = 0,</p><p>∬ Q T w ϕ d x d t = − ∬ Q T u x x ϕ d x d t + ν ∬ Q T u t ϕ d x d t .</p><p>3) u ( x ,0 ) = u 0 ( x ) .</p><p>Theorem 2. Let u 0 ∈ L 2 ( Ω ) and ν &gt; 0 . Then there exists at least one pair ( u , w ) of (2) satisfying</p><p>1) u ∈ L ∞ ( 0 , T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) ∩ L 2 ( 0 , T ; H 2 ( Ω ) ) ∩ C ( [ 0 , T ] ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) , u t ∈ L 2 ( Q T ) ;</p><p>2) For any test function ϕ ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; H 2 ( Ω ) ) with ϕ x ( − 1 , t ) = ϕ x ( 1 , t ) = 0 , it has</p><p>∬ Q T u t ϕ d x d t + ∬ Q T u x x u x ϕ x d x d t − ν ∬ Q T u u t ϕ x x d x d t = 0.</p><p>3) u ( x , 0 ) = u 0 ( x ) .</p><p>The following lemmas are needed in the paper:</p><p>Lemma 1. (Aubin-Lions, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref13">13</xref>] ) Let X, B and Y be Banach spaces and assume X → B → Y with compact imbedding X → B .</p><p>1) Let F be bounded in L p ( 0, T ; X ) where 1 ≤ p &lt; ∞ , and ∂ F ∂ t = { ∂ f ∂ t : f ∈ F } be bounded in L 1 ( 0, T ; Y ) . Then F is relatively compact in L p ( 0, T ; B ) ;</p><p>2) Let F be bounded in L ∞ ( 0, T ; X ) , and ∂ F ∂ t = { ∂ f ∂ t : f ∈ F } be bounded in L r ( 0, T ; Y ) where r &gt; 1 . Then F is relatively compact in C ( [ 0, T ] ; B ) .</p><p>Lemma 2. (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref14">14</xref>] or [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref15">15</xref>] ) Let V be a real, separable, reflexive Banach space and H is a real, separable, Hilbert space. V → H is continuous and V is dense in H. Then { u ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; V ) | u t ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; V ′ ) } is continuously imbedded in C ( [ 0, T ] ; H ) .</p><p>In this paper, C is denoted as a positive constant and may change from line to line. The paper is arranged as follows. The existence of solutions to the approximate problem will be proved in Section 2. In Section 3, we will take the limit for small parameters δ → 0 .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Approximate Problem</title><p>For any 0 &lt; δ &lt; 1 , we consider the following approximate problem. In order to apply existence theory better, we transform (1) into a system:</p><p>{ u δ t − ( m δ ( u δ ) w δ x ) x = 0     in     Q T , w δ = − u δ x x + ν u δ t     in     Q T , u δ x = w δ x = 0     on     Γ , u δ ( x , 0 ) = u δ 0 ( x ) (3)</p><p>with u δ 0 ( x ) = u 0 ( x ) + δ , m δ ( u δ ) = u δ + + δ and u δ + = max { u δ , 0 } .</p><p>Lemma 3. There exists at least one solution u δ to (3) satisfying</p><p>1) w δ ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) , u δ ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; H 2 ( Ω ) ) ∩ L ∞ ( 0, T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) ∩ C ( [ 0 , T ] ; L 2 ( Ω ) ) , u δ t ∈ L 2 ( Q T ) and u δ ( x , 0 ) = u δ 0 ;</p><p>2) For any test function ϕ ∈ L 2 ( 0, T ; H 1 ( Ω ) ) , it has</p><p>∬ Q T u δ t ϕ d x d t + ∬ Q T m δ ( u δ ) w δ x ϕ x d x d t = 0,</p><p>∬ Q T w δ ϕ d x d t = − ∬ Q T u δ x x ϕ d x d t + ν ∬ Q T u δ t ϕ d x d t .</p><p>Proof. We apply the Galerkin method to prove this Lemma and so we choose { ϕ i } i = 1 , 2 , 3 , ⋯ as the eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator with Neumann boundary value conditions such that − ϕ i x x = λ i ϕ i . Moreover, we can suppose that the eigenfunctions are orthogonal in the H<sup>1</sup> and L<sup>2</sup> spaces. We use ( ⋅ , ⋅ ) to denote the scalar product in L<sup>2</sup> space and we can normalize ϕ i such that ( ϕ i , ϕ j ) = δ i j = { 1 ,           i = j , 0 ,       i ≠ j . Besides, we can choose λ 1 = 0 and ϕ 1 = 1 .</p><p>For any positive integer M, we define u δ M ( x , t ) = ∑ i = 1 M   c i ( t ) ϕ i ( x ) , u δ M ( x , 0 ) = ∑ i = 1 M ( u 0 , ϕ i ) ϕ i , w δ M ( x , t ) = ∑ i = 1 M   d i ( t ) ϕ i ( x ) . Now we consider the following ordinary differential equations system:</p><p>d d t ( u δ M , ϕ j ) = − ( m δ ( u δ M ) w δ x M , ϕ j x ) , (4)</p><p>( w δ M , ϕ j ) = − ( u δ x x M , ϕ j ) + ν d d t ( u δ M , ϕ j ) , (5)</p><p>for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which yields an initial value problem for the ordinary differential equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula3"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula4"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A standard argument can show that this ODE has a local solution by Peano existence theorem since the matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is positive definite. In order to get the global solvability, we need establish more energy estimates. Multiply (4) by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula5"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the test function in (5), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula6"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula7"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it has</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula8"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by (4) with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can apply Poincar&#233;’s inequality to obtain the following estimates:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula9"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the test function in (5), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula10"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By integrating over <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and applying the H&#246;ler's inequality, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula11"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula12"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>There exists a subsequence of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a pair <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that, as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula13"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula14"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula15"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula16"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula17"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the last estimate is from Lemma 1. By (13)-(17), we can perform the limit <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in a standard fashion and the strong convergence in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> implies<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Limit <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title><p>In the section, we will perform the limit <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the solutions from Lemma 3. For the purpose of the existence, we need establish some uniform estimates independent of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus, we define a convex function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as following (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.88051-ref10">10</xref>] ):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula18"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover, the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>By applying this function, we can get the following estimates.</p><p>Lemma 4. There exist some constants C independent of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><p>1)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>2)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>3)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>4)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>5)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>6)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. Taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a test function in the first equation of (3), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula19"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, it yields the results 1 - 3. We can prove 4 and 5 from (8). By choosing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a test function in the second equation of (3), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula20"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We have completed the proof of this lemma.</p><p>Lemma 5. There exists a pair <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that, as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>1)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>2)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>3) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and a.e. in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>4)<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>5) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>a.e. in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. By Lemma 4, we can get the results 1 - 2 and 4 directly. Lemma 1 yields 3. By applying the definition of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and (18), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula21"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula22"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Letting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we obtain <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which completes the proof of 6.</p><p>Proof of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2. Taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a test function in Lemma 3, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula23"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula24"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which yields Theorem 1.</p><p>On the other hand, by integrating by parts, it implies</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula25"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x151.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, it has</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula26"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x152.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It gives Theorem 2.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Through this paper, two forms of a viscous thin film equation are studied (see the Equations (1) and (2)) and we give the corresponding existence theorems of weak solutions (see Theorem 1 and Theorem 2). For any test function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have proved that the weak solutions satisfy the equalities:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula27"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x154.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.88051-formula28"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x155.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the thin film equation is a degenerate parabolic equation, it is hard to give the existence of strong solutions. On the another hand, the viscous term affects the regularity of solutions and we have shown that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/12-1721337x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We can expect that we can show that the existence results would be true with some conditions in high-dimensional space.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Funding</title><p>The work was supported by the Education Department Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China (No. JDL2016029) and the Natural Science Fund of Liaoning Province of China (No. 20170540136).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Qiu, Y. and Liang, B. (2018) Existence of Solutions to a Viscous Thin Film Equation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6, 2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.610178</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.88051-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahn, J.M. and Hilliard, J.E. (1958) Free Energy of a Non-Uniform System I. Interfacial Free Energy. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 28, 258-367. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elliott, C.M. and Zheng, S. (1986) On the Cahn Hilliard Equation. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 96, 339-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251803</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elliott, C.M. and Garcke, H. (1996) On the Cahn Hilliard Equation with Degenerate Mobility. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 27, 404-423. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036141094267662</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, M. and Zhou, S. (2005) Existence and Uniqueness of Weak Solutions for a Generalized Thin Film Equation. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications, 60, 755-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2004.01.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, M. and Zhou, S. (2008) Stability and Regularity of Weak Solutions for a Generalized Thin Film Equation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 337, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.03.075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liang, B. and Zheng, S. (2008) Existence and Asymptotic Behavior of Solutions to a Nonlinear Parabolic Equation of Fourth Order. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 348, 234-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.07.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Myers, T.G. (1998) Thin Films with High Surface Tension. SIAM Reviews, 40, 441-462. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003614459529284X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernis, F. and Friedman, A. (1990) Higher Order Nonlinear Degenerate Parabolic Equations. Journal of Differential Equations, 83, 179-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(90)90074-Y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bertozzi, A.L. and Pugh, M. (1994) The Lubrication Approximation for Thin Viscous Films. Nonlinearity, 7, 1535-1564. https://doi.org/10.1088/0951-7715/7/6/002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boutat, M., Hilout, S., Rakotoson, J.E., et al. (2008) A Generalized Thin-Film Equation in Multidimensional Space. Nonlinear Analysis, 69, 1268-1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2007.06.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ansini, L. and Giacomelli, L. (2004) Doubly Nonlinear Thin-Film Equations in One Space Dimension. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 173, 89-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00205-004-0313-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beretta, E., Bertsch, M. and Dal Passo, R. (1995) Nonnegative Solutions of a Fourth-Order Nonlinear Degenerate Parabolic Equation. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 129, 175-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379920</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Simon, J. (1987) Compact Sets in the Space  . Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata, 146, 65-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01762360</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grün, G. (1995) Degenerate Parabolic Differential Equations of Fourth Order and a Plasticity Model with Nonlocal Hardening. Zeitschrift für Analysis und Ihre Anwendungen, 14, 541-574. https://doi.org/10.4171/ZAA/639</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.88051-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeidler, E. (1997) Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications. Springer, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>