<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2018.67118</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-85890</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Nonexistence of Global Solutions for a Time Fractional Schr&#246;dinger Equation with Nonlinear Memory
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yaning</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Quanguo</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang, Henan, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Mathematics &amp;amp; Statistics, Nanjing University of Information Science &amp;amp; Technology, Nanjing, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>liyn11@126.com(YL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>07</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1418</fpage><lpage>1424</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  In this paper, we study the nonexistence of solutions of the following time fractional nonlinear Schr
  ?dinger equations with nonlinear memory 
  <img src="Edit_abbbbe86-d860-47d4-a3ab-13a6ae15b644.bmp" alt="" /> 
     
     
   
    
    where 0&lt;λ&lt;β&lt;1
    
    , ι<sup>λ</sup>
    
     denotes the principal value of ι<sup>λ</sup>
    
    , p&gt;1
    
    , T&gt;0
    
    , λ∈C/{0}
    
    , u(t,x)
    
     is a complex-value function, <img src="Edit_d438ef61-ae4c-44d6-8e66-af4140aa06a3.bmp" alt="" />
    
     denotes left Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order 1-λ
    
     and <img src="Edit_c3389ba1-2366-4350-ad99-3706dd74a284.bmp" alt="" />
    
     is the Caputo fractional derivative of order 
    
    . We obtain that the problem admits no global weak solution when <img src="Edit_d27815af-5fc7-4979-bbde-a80cd7565974.bmp" alt="" />
    
     and <img src="Edit_29f7b41b-d441-440b-820d-767dff4013c8.bmp" alt="" />
    
     under different conditions for initial data. 
     
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fractional Schr&#246;dinger Equation</kwd><kwd> Nonexistence</kwd><kwd> Cauchy Problems</kwd><kwd> Nonlinear Memory</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>This paper is concerned with the nonexistence of solutions to the Cauchy problem for the time fractional nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equations with nonlinear memory</p><p>{ i α D 0 C t α u + Δ u = λ I 0 t 1 − γ ( | u | p ) ,     x ∈ ℝ N ,     t &gt; 0 , u ( 0 , x ) = g ( x ) ,     x ∈ ℝ N , (1)</p><p>where 0 &lt; α &lt; γ &lt; 1 , i α denotes principal value of i α , p &gt; 1 , T &gt; 0 , λ = λ 1 + λ 2 i ∈ ℂ \ { 0 } , λ 1 , λ 2 ∈ ℝ , u = u ( t , x ) is a complex-valued function, g ( x ) = g 1 ( x ) + g 2 ( x ) i , g 1 ( x ) and g 2 ( x ) are real-valued functions. I 0 t 1 − γ denotes left Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals of order 1 − γ and</p><p>D 0 C t α u = ∂ ∂ t I 0 t 1 − α ( u ( t , x ) − u ( 0 , x ) ) .</p><p>For the nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equations without gauge invariance (i.e. α = γ = 1 ),</p><p>{ i u t + Δ u = λ | u | p ,     x ∈ ℝ N ,     t &gt; 0 , u ( 0 , x ) = g ( x ) ,     x ∈ ℝ N , (2)</p><p>Ikeda and Wakasugi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref1">1</xref>] and Ikeda and Inui [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref3">3</xref>] proved blow-up results of solutions for (2) under different conditions for</p><p>1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 2 N and 1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 4 N .</p><p>The main tool they used is test function method. This method is based on rescalings of a compactly support test function to prove blow-up results which is first used by Mitidieri and Pohozaev [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref4">4</xref>] to show the blow-up results.</p><p>Recently, it has been seen that fractional differential equations have better effects in many realistic applications than the classical ones. So, considerable attention has been attracted to time fractional diffusion equation which arises in electromagnetic, acoustic and mechanical phenomena etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref5">5</xref>] , and is derived from classical diffusion equation by replacing the first-order time derivative by a fractional derivative of order α with α ∈ ( 0,1 ] . Fractional diffusion equation was explicitly applied to physics by Nigmatullin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref6">6</xref>] to describe diffusion in media with fractal geometry (special types of porous media). There are many papers about the existence and properties of solutions for fractional differential equation, see for example [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref11">11</xref>] and the references therein.</p><p>For nonlinear time fractional Schr&#246;dinger equations (i.e., (1) with γ = 1 ), Zhang, Sun and Li [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref12">12</xref>] studied the nonexistence of this problem in C 0 ( R N ) and proved that the problem admits no global weak solution with suitable initial</p><p>data when 1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 2 N by using test function method, and also give some</p><p>conditions which imply the problem has no global weak solution for every p &gt; 1 .</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref13">13</xref>] , Cazenave, Dickstein and Weissler considered a class of heat equation with nonlinear memory. They obtained that the solution blows up in finite time and under suitable conditions the solution exists globally. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref14">14</xref>] , using test function method, the authors considered a heat equation with nonlinear memory, they determined Fujita critical exponent of the problem.</p><p>Motivated by above results, in present paper, our purpose is to study the nonexistence of global weak solutions of (1) with a condition related to the sign of initial data when</p><p>1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 2 ( α + 1 − γ ) α N and 1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 1 − γ α .</p><p>This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some preliminaries and the main results are presented. In Section 3, we give proof of the main results.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries and the Main Results</title><p>For convenience of statement, let us present some preliminaries that will be used in next sections.</p><p>If D 0 C t α f ∈ L 1 ( 0, T ) , g ∈ C 1 ( [ 0, T ] ) and g ( T ) = 0 , then we have the following formula of integration by parts</p><p>∫ 0 T g D 0 C t α f d t = ∫ 0 T ( f ( t ) − f ( 0 ) ) D t C T α g d t . (3)</p><p>We need calculate Caputo fractional derivative of the following function, which will be used in next sections. For given T &gt; 0 and n &gt; 0 , if we let</p><p>φ ( t ) = { ( 1 − t T ) n ,       t ≤ T , 0 ,                           t &gt; T ,</p><p>then</p><p>D t C T α φ ( t ) = Γ ( n + 1 ) Γ ( n + 1 − α ) T − α ( 1 − t T ) n − α ,   t ≤ T ,</p><p>(see for example [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.85890-ref15">15</xref>] ).</p><p>Now, we present the definition of weak solution of (1).</p><p>Definition 2.1. Let g ∈ L l o c 1 ( R N ) , 0 &lt; α &lt; γ &lt; 1 and T &gt; 0 , we call u ∈ L p ( ( 0, T ) , L l o c ∞ ( R N ) ) is a weak solution of (1) if</p><p>∫ R N ∫ 0 T λ I 0 t 1 − γ ( | u | p ) φ + i α g ( x ) D t C T α φ d t d x = ∫ R N ∫ 0 T u ( Δ φ + i α D t C T α φ ) d t d x</p><p>for every φ ∈ C x , t 2,1 ( R N &#215; [ 0, T ] ) with s u p p x φ ⊂ ⊂ R N and φ ( x , T ) = 0 . Moreover, if T &gt; 0 can be arbitrarily chosen, then we call u is a global weak solution for of (1).</p><p>Denote</p><p>G 1 ( x ) = cos π α 2 g 1 ( x ) − sin π α 2 g 2 ( x ) , G 2 ( x ) = cos π α 2 g 2 ( x ) + sin π α 2 g 1 (x)</p><p>and β = 1 − γ .</p><p>The following theorems show main result of this paper.</p><p>Theorem 2.2. Let 1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 2 ( α + β ) α N . If g ∈ L 1 ( ℝ N ) and satisfies</p><p>λ 1 ∫ ℝ N G 1 ( x ) d x &gt; 0 ,     or     λ 2 ∫ ℝ N G 2 ( x ) d x &gt; 0 ,</p><p>then problem (1) admits no global weak solution.</p><p>Theorem 2.3. If 1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + β α , let χ ( x ) = ( ∫ ℝ N e − N 2 + | x | 2 d x ) − 1 e − N 2 + | x | 2 . If g ∈ L ( ℝ N ) 1 and satisfies</p><p>λ 1 ∫ ℝ N G 1 ( x ) χ ( x ) d x &gt; 0,     or     λ 2 ∫ ℝ N G 2 ( x ) χ ( x ) d x &gt; 0,</p><p>then problem (1) admits no global weak solution.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Proofs of Main Result</title><p>In this section, we prove blow-up results and global existence of mild solutions of (1).</p><p>Proof of Theorem 2.2. If</p><p>1 &lt; p &lt; 1 + 2 ( α + β ) α N ,</p><p>for the case λ 1 ∫ ℝ N G 1 ( x ) d x &gt; 0 , we may as well suppose that λ 1 &gt; 0 and ∫ ℝ N G 1 ( x ) d x &gt; 0 . Let Φ ∈ C 0 ∞ ( ℝ N ) such that Φ ( s ) = 1 for | s | ≤ 1 , Φ ( s ) = 0 for | s | &gt; 2 and 0 ≤ Φ ( s ) ≤ 1 . For T &gt; 0 , we define</p><p>φ 1 ( x ) = ( Φ ( T − α 2 | x | ) ) 2 p p − 1 ,   φ 2 ( t ) = ( 1 − t T ) m ,   m ≥ max { 1 , p ( α + β ) p − 1 } ,   t ∈ [ 0 , T ] .</p><p>Let φ ( x , t ) = D t C T β φ 1 ( x ) φ 2 ( t ) . Assuming that u is a weak solution of (1), and since α + β &lt; 1 , we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula1"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>that is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula2"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula3"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for some positive constant C independent of T. Then, by (4), (5) and H&#246;lder inequality, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula4"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula5"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore, if the solution of (1) exists globally, then taking<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula6"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which contradicts with the assumption.</p><p>For case<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula7"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then by a similar proof as above, we can also obtain a contradiction.</p><p>Proof of Theorem 2.3. We only consider the case <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, since other cases can be proved by a similar method. Take <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula8"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Suppose that u is a bounded weak solution of (1), taking</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula9"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and define<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then using the definition of weak solution of (1) and since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we derive that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula10"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula11"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula12"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>by (6) and dominated convergence theorem, let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula13"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula14"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence, by Jensen’s inequality and (7), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula15"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Denoting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula16"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.85890-formula17"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by taking<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which contradicts with the</p><p>assumption. Therefore, if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a solution of (1), then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/2-1721253x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Supported</title><p>Supported by NSF of China (11626132, 11601216).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Li, Y.N. and Zhang, Q.G. (2018) The Nonexistence of Global Solutions for a Time Fractional Schr&#246;dinger Equation with Nonlinear Memory. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6, 1418-1424. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.67118</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.85890-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikeda, M. and Wakasugi, Y. (2013) Small Data Blow-Up of L2-Solution for the Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation without Gauge Invariance. Differential Integral Equations, 26, 1275-1285.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikeda, M. and Inui, T. (2015) Small Data Blow-Up of L2 or H1-Solution for the Semilinear Schrodinger Equation without Gauge Invariance. Journal of Evolution Equations, 15, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-015-0273-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikeda, M. and Inui, T. (2015) Some Non-Existence Results for the Semilinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation without Gauge Invariance. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 425, 758-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.01.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mitidieri, E. and Pohozaev, S.I. (2001) A Priori Estimates and Blow-Up of Solutions to Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Inequalities. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 234, 1-383.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Mainardi, F. (1994) On the Initial Value Problem for the Fractional Diffusion-Wave Equation. In Rionero, S. and Ruggeri, T., Eds., Waves and Stability in Continuous Media, World Scientific, Singapore, 246-251.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nigmatullin, R.R. (1986) The Realization of the Generalized Transfer Equation in a Medium with Fractal Geometry. Physica Status Solidi, 133, 425-430. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221330150</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrade, B. and Viana, A. (2017) On a Fractional Reaction-Diffusion Equation. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 68, 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-017-0801-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.N. (2015) Regularity of Mild Solutions for Fractional Abstract Cauchy Problem with Order  . Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 66, 3283-3298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-015-0577-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.N., Sun, H.R. and Feng, Z.S. (2016) Fractional Abstract Cauchy Problem with Order  . Dynamics of PDE, 13, 155-177.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vergara, V. and Zacher, R. (2017) Stability, Instability, and Blowup for Time Fractional and Other Nonlocal in Time Semilinear Subdiffusion Equations. Journal of Evolution Equations, 17, 599-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00028-016-0370-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q.G. and Sun, H.R. (2015) The Blow-Up and Global Existence of Solutions of Cauchy Problems for a Time Fractional Diffusion Equation. Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, 46, 69-92. https://doi.org/10.12775/TMNA.2015.038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Q.G., Sun, H.R. and Li, Y.N. (2017) The Nonexistence of Global Solutions for a Time Fractional Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation without Gauge Invariance. Applied Mathematics Letters, No. 64, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2016.08.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cazenave, T., Dickstein, F. and Weissler, F.B. (2008) An Equation Whose Fujita Critical Exponent Is Not Given by Scaling. Nonlinear Analysis, 68, 862-874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2006.11.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fino, A.Z. and Kirane, M. (2012) Qualitative Properties of Solutions to a Time-Space Fractional Evolution Equation. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 70, 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0033-569X-2011-01246-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.85890-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kilbas, A.A., Srivastava, H.M. and Trujillo, J.J. (2006) Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Vol 204. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-0208(06)80001-0</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>