<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2018.63051</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-83347</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On the Extension of the Three-Term Recurrence Relation to Probabilities Distributions without Moments
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Habib</surname><given-names>Rebei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anis</surname><given-names>Riahi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Qassim University, Al-Mulida, Saudi Arabia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rebei97@yahoo.fr(HR)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>588</fpage><lpage>601</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>10,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, we extend the three-term recurrence relation for orthogonal polynomials associated with a probability distribution having a finite moment 
  of all order
  s
   to
   a class of orthogonal functions associated with an infinitely divisible probability distribution &amp;#181;
  
   having a finite moments of order less or equal to four. An explicit expression of these functions will be given in term of the L&#233;vy-Khintchine function of the measure &amp;#181;.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Three-Term Recurrence Relation</kwd><kwd> Quantum Decomposition of Random Variables Without Moments</kwd><kwd> L&#233;vy-Khintchine Function</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It has been known from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref1">1</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref2">2</xref>] that for every probability distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with finite moments of all orders, there exits a family of monic orthogonal polynomials <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a paire of sequences <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying the three-term recurrence relation (or the tri-diagonal Jacobi relation)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula1"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula2"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula3"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The sequences (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) are called the Szego-Jacobi parameters of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The starting point of the quantum probabilistic approach to the theory of orthogonal polynomials (OP) is an operator interpretation of the tri-diagonal Jacobi relation (3) in terms of Creation, Annihilation and Preservation (CAP) operators. This allows to associate, in a canonical way, to any random variable with all moments commutation relations that generalize the Heisenberg commutation relations (corresponding to the Gauss-Poisson class). From the mathematical point of view, this approach has led to some new results in the theory of OP.</p><p>In order to give this operator interpretation, we shall recall the notion of the interacting Fock probability space associated with the measure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (See [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref3">3</xref>] for more details).</p><p>Consider an infinite-dimensional separable Hilbert space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, in which a complete orthonormal basis <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is chosen. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the dense subspace spanned by the complete orthonormal basis<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Given the sequence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we associate linear operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula4"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula5"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Its known that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are mutually adjoint and the linear subspace <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> spanned by the set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is invariant under the action of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The quadruple <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called the interacting Fock probability space associated with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are called the creation operator and the annihilation operators respectively. The linear operator given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula6"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is called the number operator. More generally, with the sequence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we associate the preservation operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the prescription</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula7"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the space of classes of complex valued, square integrable functions w.r.t<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In the following, we simply denote it by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and we assume that the sub-space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> spanned by the polynomial functions is dense in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. So that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an Hilbertian basis of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In such case, we consider the isomorphism U from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> whose its restriction on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula8"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then the U is unitary and we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula9"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula10"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula11"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula12"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula13"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula14"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This means that the field operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-image of the position operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> providing, in this way, a new interpretation of the recursion relation driving by OP in term of CAP operators. Since the random variable with distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be identified, up to stochastic equivalence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, with the position operator q on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the previous new formulation of the tri-diagonal Jacobi relation in term of the CAP operators is called the quantum decomposition of the classical random variable. In fact we have seen that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula15"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This shows that any classical random variable has a built in non commutative structure which is intrinsic and canonical, and not artificially put by hands, that is a sum of three non commuting random variables.</p><p>This result motivated the apparition of a series of papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref9">9</xref>] dealing in the same context and provided many applications in the theory of quantum probability. In the paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref4">4</xref>] , a similar result was obtained but for the family of random variables having an infinitely divisible distribution (I.D-distribution in the following) and having only the moment of the second order. Here, similarity means that the quantum decomposition can be obtained also for this family of random variables.</p><p>Based on the notion of the positive definite kernel and using the L&#233;vy-Khintchine function established for the I.D-distributions, the paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref4">4</xref>] constructed a natural isomorphism U from the Fock space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> over the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-space w.r.t the L&#233;vy measure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-image of the position operator q is the field operator</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula16"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. See papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref10">10</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref11">11</xref>] in which the operator Q was widely studied.</p><p>In this approach, the construction was not based on the orthogonal polynomials sequence associated with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. But it required only the infinite divisibility property, where the L&#233;vy-Khinchine function have played an important role. Then one can ask about the analytic form of the relation (4), or equivalently the counterpart of the three-term recurrence relation. The only obscure point is the existence of such an analogue of the sequence of the orthogonal polynomials. Since the hypothesis on moments is not satisfied, such a sequence of orthogonal polynomial does exist. But the isomorphism U provided us a such chaos-decomposition of the space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For this reason we ask the question if there exist a such analogue for the family of orthogonal polynomial, if it is the case it must be a total family of orthogonal functions in the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying a recursion relation similar to the well known for OP.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows:</p><p>In Section 2, we recall some known facts about the bosonic Fock space and the quantum decomposition of classical random variables without moments, having I.D-distributions, obtained in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref4">4</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref5">5</xref>] . In Section 3, we compute the action of the generalized field operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the n<sup>th</sup><sup> </sup>particle vectors (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). The main result of this paper will be given in Section 4, so that we compute the action of the position operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the orthogonal functions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This provide such a generalization of the tri-diagonal recursion relation for OP. Finally, the explicit form of theses functions will be given.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Bosonic Fock Space</title><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a separable Hilbert space. Let us denote <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (resp.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) the tensor product of n-copies of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (resp.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the unique unitary operator such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula17"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a permutation of n-variables.</p><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, were <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the vacuum vector, let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula18"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>be the orthogonal projection.</p><p>We define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula19"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let us denote</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula20"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreover, the set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is linearly independent dense in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The bosonic creation and annihilation operators are defined, on the total set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula21"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>as follows:</p><p>For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula22"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula23"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula24"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula25"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula26"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula27"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes omission of the corresponding variable. The preservation operator associated with the self adjoint operator T on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula28"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Quantum Decomposition of Classical Random Variables with I.D-Distributions</title><p>In this section, we recall briefly, what has been obtained in the paper [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref4">4</xref>] around quantum decomposition of random variables with I.D-distributions and having a finite second order moment.</p><p>Let us consider a random variable X with I.D-probability distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> having a finite second order moment. It is known (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref13">13</xref>] ), that the Fourier transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula29"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula30"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the the L&#233;vy measure of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called the L&#233;vy-Khintchine function or the characteristic exponent associated with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since the second order moment of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is finite, the same result will be true for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e,:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula31"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We suppose also that the gaussian part of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is null (i.e.,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). Under these conditions, we have the following results:</p><p>The family <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the trigonometric functions is total in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the family of the functions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula32"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is total in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Then by applying the Araki-Woods-Parthasarathy-Schmidt isomorphism in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref12">12</xref>] for the infinitely divisible positive definite kernel</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula33"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we have proved the following theorem (See [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref4">4</xref>] for more details and descriptions).</p><p>Theorem 2.1. The unique linear operator U given on the exponential vectors <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula34"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula35"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is an unitary isomorphism from the Fock space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Definition 1. Let q be the multiplication (position) operator in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula36"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Define the operator Q on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula37"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where U is the isomorphism defined by (12). Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a finite measure on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the operator q is self-adjoint (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref14">14</xref>] Proposition 1, chapter VIII. 3) and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula38"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The operator Q is called the generalized field operator.</p><p>It follows from condition (10) that the total set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is in the domain of Q. Moreover, one has the following theorem:</p><p>Theorem 2.2. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the function given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula39"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then the generalized field operator Q takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula40"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the expectation of X, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the creation, annihilation and preservation operators in the Fock space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by the prescriptions as in (5)-(7).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Generalized Field Operator</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Notations</title><p>We denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the set of all sequences of non negatives integers with finite number of nonzero entries. In the sequel <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (resp.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) will be interpreted as subset of the set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (resp.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). Throughout the remain of this paper we shall use the following notations:</p><p>For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula41"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula42"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x151.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The support of such element <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula43"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x153.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a sequence of elements of an Hilbert space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we denote</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula44"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In particular if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, so that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> takes the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula45"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x161.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula46"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83347-ref15">15</xref>] , we recall the following identity which is the analogue of the multinomial Newton formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula47"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which take place whenever the series <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is convergent.</p><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is separable and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x166.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an Hilbertian basis of it, then the set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula48"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x167.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is an orthonormal basis of the Hilbert space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, with the convention<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the canonic basis of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we denote</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula49"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x173.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula50"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x174.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be defined as in (16), however it is not an element of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, because its k<sup>th</sup>-entry<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x176.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In this case, we adapt by convention that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula51"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, we recall that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula52"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula53"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Computation of the Action of the Generalized Field Operator on the Basis (F<sub>n</sub>)<sub>n</sub></title><p>In the remain, we take <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and we assume that second order moment of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is finite. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the function given by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula54"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x186.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is total in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (See (11)), then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is also total. Then by the Gram-Schmidt procedure, we construct an Hilbertian basis of it, that is denoted by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula55"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x190.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 3.1. If the 4<sup>th</sup>-moment of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is finite then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula56"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x194.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then it is sufficient to prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula57"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x199.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where we have used the condition (10).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula58"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x200.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>,</p><p>Proposition 3.1. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the orthogonal basis of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula59"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x203.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x204.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the basis given by (20). Then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula60"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x205.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula61"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x206.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula62"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x207.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Remark 1. Note that the relation (22) still true in the case when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with convention that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. From (5), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula63"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x211.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula64"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x212.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This prove (21).</p><p>From (5), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula65"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x213.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, we have two cases:</p><p>If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then (24), becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula66"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x215.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore (24) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula67"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x219.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>But in view of (17), we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which gives that the relation (25) sill true. Hence (22) is proved.</p><p>Now, it remains to justify (23). From (7), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula68"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x221.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x222.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then it can be written as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula69"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x223.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the fact that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x224.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded, the Equation (26) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula70"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x225.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>But we have for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x226.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula71"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x227.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then (27) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula72"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x228.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This ends the proof. ,</p><p>Corollary 3.1.1 The action of the generalized field operator Q on the basis <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x229.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula73"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x230.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(29)</p><p>Proof. A straightforward computations. ,</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Orthogonal Functions and Generalization of the Three-Term Recurrence Relation</title><p>In this section, we give the action of the multiplication operator q on the functions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula74"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x231.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then we deduce the generalization of the three-term recurrence relation in term of the orthogonal functions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x232.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since U is unitary from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an orthogonal basis of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x236.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the family <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x236.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an orthogonal basis of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x233.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x236.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Theorem 4.1 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x240.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the diagonal operator from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x240.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x241.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to itself given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula75"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x242.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x243.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula76"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x244.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 2. Since U is unitary and the basis <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x245.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is orthogonal, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x245.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x246.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an orthogonal basis of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x245.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x246.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x247.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreover, the chaos decomposition of the Fock space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x245.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x246.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x247.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x248.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> induces the following chaos-decomposition of the space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x245.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x246.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x247.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x248.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x249.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula77"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x250.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now comparing the relation (30) with (3), the only difference is the apparition of a corrective expression <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x251.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (30) which is in the n<sup>th</sup> chaos. In the case when it is null, (30) will be exactly the well-known tri-diagonal recurrence relation (3). In this sense the relation (30) can be interpreted as a generalization of the three term recurrence relation. Here, the monic orthogonal polynomial sequence is replaced by a double-entries sequence of orthogonal functions parameterized by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x251.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x252.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x251.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x252.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x253.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In addition to the infinite divisibility property, this generalization require only the existence of the second and fourth order moments of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x251.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x252.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x253.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x254.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. From relation (29), we deduce that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula78"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x255.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula79"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x256.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proposition 4.2. We assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x257.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is continuous w.r.t the Lebesgue measure with Radon-Nikodym derivative<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x257.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x258.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then for all <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x257.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x258.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x259.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x257.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x258.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x259.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x260.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one has</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula80"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x261.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula81"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x262.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x263.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an Hilbertian basis of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x263.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x264.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x263.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x264.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x265.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula82"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x266.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the series converge in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x267.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It follows, from the multinomial Newton formula (14), that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula83"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x268.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula84"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x269.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This implies that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula85"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x270.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the definition of U, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula86"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x271.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is the decomposition of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x272.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the basis<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x272.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x273.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula87"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x274.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On the other hand, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula88"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x275.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This implies that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula89"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x276.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or equivalently</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula90"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x277.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x278.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the Fourier transform on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x278.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x279.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Note that the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x278.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x279.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x280.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> belongs to the space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x278.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x279.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x280.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x281.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It follows that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula91"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x282.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>,</p><p>which is equivalent to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83347-formula92"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x283.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The infinite-divisibility of the distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x284.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives rise to the Kolmogorov isomorphism U, which was the principal bridge between the Fock space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x284.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x285.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x284.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x285.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/11-1721075x286.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> transforming, in such canonical way, the quantum decomposition identity to the tri-diagonal recurrence relation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors gratefully acknowledge Qassim University, represented by the Deanship of Scientific Research, on the material support for this research under the number 3378 during the academic year 1436 AH/2015 AD.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rebei, H. and Riahi, A. (2018) On the Extension of the Three-Term Recurrence Relation to Probabilities Distributions without Moments. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6, 588-601. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.63051</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.83347-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hora, A. and Obata, N. (2007) Quantum Probability and Spectral Analysis of Graphs, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Asai, N., Kubo, I. and Kuo, H.H. (2003) Generating Functions of Orthogonal Polynomials and Szego-Jacobi Parameters. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 23, 273-291.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L. and Bozejko, M. (1998) Interacting Fock Space and Gaussianization of Probability Measures. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 1, 663-670. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219025798000363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L., Rebei, H. and Riahi, A. (2013) The Quantum Decomposition of Infinitely Divisible Random Variables. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 16, 1350012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L., Rebei, H. and Riahi, A. (2014) The Quantum Decomposition Associated with the Lévy White Noise Processes without Moments. Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 34, 337-362.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L., Ouerdiane, H. and Rebei, H. (2010) On the Quadratic Heisenberg Group. Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 13, 551-587. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219025710004231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rebei</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>The Generalized Heisenberg Group Arising from Weyl Relations, Quantum Studies</article-title><source> Mathematics and Foundations</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 323</fpage>-<lpage>350</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rebei, H. (2016) On the One Mode Quadratic Weyl Operators. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 439, 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.02.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rebei, H., Al-Mohaimeed, B. and Riahi, A. (2015) Classical Versions of Quantum Stochastic Processes Associated with the Adapted Oscillator Algebra. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics, 3, 245-253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L., Ouerdiane, H. and Rebei, H. (2012) Lévy Processes through Time Schift on Oscillator Weyl Algebra. Communications on Stochastic Analysis, 6, 125-155.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L., Ouerdiane, H. and Rebei, H. (2012) Renormalized Square of White Noise Quantum Time Shift. Communications on Stochastic Analysis, 6, 177-191.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accardi, L., Boukas, A. and Misiewicz, J. (2011) Existence of the Fock Representation for Current Algebras of the Galilei Algebra. QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and Related Topics, 27, 1-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sato, K.-I. (1999) Lévy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions. Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reed, M. and Simon, B. (1980) Functional Analysis, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. Vol. 1. Academic Press, INC., London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83347-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stochel</surname><given-names> J.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Subnormality of Generalized Cration and Annihilation Operators on Bargmann’s Space of Infinite Order</article-title><source> Integral Equations and Operator Theory</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 1011</fpage>-<lpage>1032</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>