<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2018.63045</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-83036</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  One Dimensional Random Motion on Segment with Reflecting Edges and Dependent Increments
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gurami</surname><given-names>Tsitsiashvili</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>IAM FEB RAS, FEFU, Vladivostok, Russia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>guram@iam.dvo.ru</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>488</fpage><lpage>497</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15,</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In previous papers
  ,
   the author considered the model of anomalous diffusion, defined by stable random process on an interval with reflecting edges. Estimates of the rate convergence of this process distribution to a uniform distribution are constructed. However, recent physical studies require consideration of models of diffusion, defined not only by stable random process with independent increments but multivariate fractional Brownian motion with dependent increments. This task requires the development of special mathematical techniques evaluation of the rate of convergence of the distribution of multivariate Brownian motion in a segment with reflecting boundaries to the limit. In the present work, this technology is developed and a power estimate of the rate of convergence to the limiting uniform distribution is built.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fractional Brownian Motion</kwd><kwd> Rate of Convergence</kwd><kwd> Anomalous Diffusion</kwd><kwd> Segment with Reflecting Edges</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In recent years, fractional Brownian motion has experienced significant growth in the applied problems of physics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref4">4</xref>] in connection with the necessity of modelling chaotic behaviour of the diffusing impurity in a variety of environments and alloys. Therefore there is a need to analyse the speed of mixing of impurities (convergence to the uniform distribution) in areas with reflecting boundaries, which cannot be obtained by the method of Fourier series.</p><p>Algorithm of constructing of such estimates was described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref5">5</xref>] for one-dimensional case and was based on the method of analysis of anomalous diffusion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref6">6</xref>] , simulating stable random process with independent increments. It is based on reflection formula for the density of the anomalous diffusion process. However, in recent years, there have been a lot of physical researches, in which models of fractional Brownian motions are used.</p><p>Therefore, in the present work the algorithm of the corresponding estimates for the fractional Brownian motion on interval with reflecting edges is constructed. This algorithm is based on a calculation of a derivative of series which is describing density of fractional Brownian motion distribution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries</title><p>Let y ( t ) , t ≥ 0 is a random process with a fixed initial value y ( 0 ) = 0 . Consider random process Y ( t ) comparable to y ( t ) but reflected at the ends of the segment [ 0,1 ] in the following way.</p><p>Construction of random process reflected on interval [0, 1]</p><p>The one-dimensional process y = y ( t ) , t ≥ 0 is mapped to the reflected (from the boundaries of the segment [ 0,1 ] random process Y ( t ) = g ( s ( y ( t ) ) ) , where the functions s : E 1 → [ 0,2 ) , g : [ 0,2 ) → [ 0,1 ] are defined by the equalities s ( u ) = ( u ) / m o d   2 , g ( u ) = u ,   0 ≤ u ≤ 1 , g ( u ) = 2 − u ,   1 &lt; u &lt; 2 , [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref5">5</xref>] . Here u / m o d   A = A { u / A } , A &gt; 0 ; { z } ―the fractional part of a real number z.</p><p>Reflection formula for random process with symmetric density</p><p>Let f t = f t ( u ) is a distribution density of a random variable (r.v.) Y ( t ) . Then by the formula Y ( t ) = g ( s ( y ( t ) ) ) we have:</p><p>f t ( u ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u − 2 k ) + ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( 2 − ( 1 + u ) − 2 k ) ,   u ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] ,</p><p>f t ( u ) = 0,   u ∉ [ 0,1 ] . If for each t &gt; 0 the density p t ( u ) is symmetric in u : p t ( u ) = p t ( − u ) , then for u ∈ [ 0,1 ]</p><p>f t ( u ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u − 2 k ) + ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( − u − ( 2 k + 1 ) ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u − k ) , (1)</p><p>f t ( u ) = 0 ,   u ∉ [ 0 , 1 ] .</p><p>It is interesting to note that the formula (1), giving the distribution of the reflected diffusion process, is very similar by its structure to the formula obtained by reflection ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref8">8</xref>] , Chapter III, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>13, paragraphs 5, 6) and gives the solution of the wave equation for a finite string with fixed ends.</p><p>Reflection formula for random process with periodic initial conditions</p><p>Define f t ( u − a ) the density of distribution of random process y ( t ) + a reflected from the ends of the segment [ 0,1 ] , 0 ≤ a ≤ 1 . Let S is a random variable, uniformly distributed on the set { 0, 1 / n , ⋯ , ( n − 1 ) / n } , and random variable S and random process y ( t ) are independent. We introduce the function F t ( u ) = f t ( u − S ) , 0 ≤ u ≤ 1 , then</p><p>F t ( u ) = 1 n ∑ s = 0 n − 1   f t ( u − s / n ) = 1 n ∑ s = 0 n − 1 ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u − k − s / n ) = 1 n ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u − k / n ) . (2)</p><p>Because of Formula (2) the function F t ( u ) possesses following properties:</p><p>F t ( u ) = F t ( u + 1 / n ) ,   0 ≤ u ≤ 1 − 1 / n ,</p><p>F t ( u / n ) = 1 n ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t ( ( u − k ) / n ) ,   0 ≤ u ≤ 1. (3)</p><p>The first equality in (3) means that the function F t ( u ) consists of n periods of length 1/n on the interval [ 0,1 ] . The second equality in (3) means that on the interval [ 0, 1 / n ] the function F t ( u ) characterizes the distribution density of a random process n y ( t ) reflected from the ends of the segment [ 0, 1 / n ] .</p><p>In turn, the function F t ( u − 1 / 2 n ) characterizes the distribution density of a random process y ( t ) + s ^ + 1 / 2 n with an initial condition s ^ + 1 / 2 n , which has a uniform distribution on the set of points 1 / 2 n , 3 / 2 n , ⋯ , ( 2 n − 1 ) / 2 n and is independent with random process y ( t ) .</p><p>Self-similar stochastic processes with reflection and periodic initial conditions</p><p>Let the random process y ( t ) is self-similar of order a [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref9">9</xref>] , i.e. for every t ≥ 0 the random variables y ( t / r − 1 / a ) ,   r y ( t ) coincides in distribution:</p><p>y ( t / r − 1 / a ) = d r y ( t ) .</p><p>In terms of the density distribution this relation looks like</p><p>p t ( u r ) = p t / r − 1 / a ( u ) . (4)</p><p>We now turn to the calculation of the function F t ( u / n ) assuming that self-similar random process y ( t ) has a symmetric density p t ( u ) :</p><p>F t ( u / n ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ 1 n p t ( ( u − k ) / n ) = ∑ k = − ∞ ∞ p t / n 1 / a ( u − k ) = f t / n 1 / a ( u ) ,   0 ≤ u ≤ 1.</p><p>Hence in particular it follows the equality</p><p>F t ( u / n − 1 / 2 n ) = f t / n − 1 / a ( u − 1 / 2 ) ,   0 ≤ u ≤ 1. (5)</p><p>Then from Formulas (3), (5) we get the equality</p><p>F t ( u − 1 / 2 n ) = f t n 1 / a ( u − 1 / 2 ) . (6)</p><p>Multidimensional random process with independent components</p><p>For simplicity of notation all future constructions without loss of generality, we spend for the flat case m = 2 . Consider a two-dimensional random process with independent components of y → ( t ) = ( y 1 ( t ) y 2 ( t ) ) , having symmetric and self-similar density distribution of order a. Construct a process Y → ( t ) with reflections from the boundaries of the square [ 0,1 ] 2 using the obvious equalities:</p><p>Y → ( t ) = ( Y 1 ( t ) , Y 2 ( t ) ) ,   Y 1 ( t ) = g ( s ( y 1 ( t ) ) ) ,   Y 2 ( t ) = g ( s ( y 2 ( t ) ) ) .</p><p>In this case equalities p t ( u 1 , u 2 ) = p t ( u 1 ) p t ( u 2 ) are true and so</p><p>f t ( u 1 , u 2 ) = ∑ k 1 , k 2 = − ∞ ∞ [ ( p t ( u 1 − 2 k 1 , u 2 − 2 k 2 ) + p t ( 2 − ( 1 + u 1 ) − 2 k 1 , u 2 − 2 k 2 ) )     + p t ( u 1 − 2 k 1 , 2 − ( 1 + u 2 ) − 2 k 2 )     + p t ( 2 − ( 1 + u 1 ) − 2 k 1 , 2 − ( 1 + u 2 ) − 2 k 2 ) ] = f t ( u 1 ) f t ( u 2 ) .</p><p>Let s = ( s 1 , s 2 ) is a random vector, uniformly distributed on the set of numbers I = { ( p 1 , p 2 / n ) ,   p 1 ,   p 2 = 0, ⋯ , n − 1 } , and independent random vector s and a random process y → ( t ) . We introduce the function F t ( u → ) = f t ( u → − s → ) , u → ∈ [ 0,1 ] 2 , then</p><p>F t ( u → ) = 1 n 2 ∑ i → ∈ I   f t ( u → − s → ) = 1 n 2 ∑ i → ∈ I ∑ k 1 = − ∞ ∞ ∑ k 2 = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u → − k → − i → ) = 1 n 2 ∑ k 1 , k 2 = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u → − k → / n ) = 1 n ∑ k 1 = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u 1 − k 1 / n ) 1 n ∑ k 2 = − ∞ ∞ p t ( u 2 − k 2 / n ) = F t ( u 1 ) F t ( u 2 ) . (7)</p><p>Because of the equality (7) the function F t ( u → ) has the following properties:</p><p>F t ( u → ) = F t ( u → + i → ) ,   u → ∈ [ 0 , 1 / n ] 2 ,   i → ∈ I ,</p><p>F t ( u → / n ) = 1 n 2 ∑ k 1 , k 2 = − ∞ ∞ p t ( ( u → − k → ) / n ) ,   u → ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] 2 .</p><p>Let f ( u → ) = ( f ( u 1 ) , f ( u 2 ) ) , then from Formula (7) it is easy to obtain the equality</p><p>F t ( u → ) − f ( u → ) = ( F t ( u 1 ) − f ( u 1 ) ) ( F t ( u 2 ) − f ( u 2 ) ) + f ( u 1 ) ( F t ( u 2 ) − f ( u 2 ) )     + f ( u 2 ) ( F t ( u 1 ) − f ( u 1 ) ) .</p><p>For a function φ ( u ) defined on the interval [ 0,1 ] , we introduce the norm ‖ φ ‖ = sup { | φ ( u ) | ,   u ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] } . A similar norm is introduced for a function φ ( u → ) , defined on the square [ 0,1 ] 2 . Let Δ n ( t ) = ‖ F t ( u ) − f ( u ) ‖ , then the following inequality holds</p><p>‖ F t ( u → ) − f ( u → ) ‖ ≤ ‖ F t ( u 1 ) − f ( u 1 ) ‖ ‖ F t ( u 2 ) − f ( u 2 ) ‖     + f ( u 2 ) ‖ F t ( u 1 ) − f ( u 1 ) ‖ + f ( u 1 ) ‖ F t ( u 2 ) − f ( u 2 ) ‖ ≤ Δ n 2 ( t ) + ( f ( u 1 ) + f ( u 2 ) ) Δ n ( t ) = Δ n 2 ( t ) + 2 Δ n ( t ) → 0 ,   t → ∞ . (8)</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Examples of Random Processes Anomalous Diffusion</title><p>Anomalous diffusion</p><p>Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>―homogeneous random process with independent increments,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The difference <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is symmetric on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> stable distribution with parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the characteristic function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Process <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is describing in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref10">10</xref>] anomalous diffusion on an infinite straight line. From this definition it follows that this process satisfing equality (4) is self-similar and therefore satisfies the equality (6).</p><p>Introduce on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the binary operation “<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>”, the unary operation of taking inverse element “<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>”:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is easy to check that so defined on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> operations generate commutative group C in addition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the identity element 0 and the inverse u element of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is obvious that the mapping <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a homomorphism of the additive group of real numbers <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the group C, i.e. the fair equalities<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="/html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Therefore, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Consequently, the random process <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with independent and homogeneous increments and the distribution density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a homogeneous Markov with values in the group C, and with the density of the conditional distribution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula32"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, hence the equality</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula33"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is true. Denote<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula34"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and so</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula35"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From equality (9), it follows that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula36"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> densities of uniform distributions on the intervals<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively.</p><p>Lemma 1. For an arbitrary <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula37"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Assuming <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and using Formula (10) we obtain for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula38"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>that is for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula39"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With the help of Formulas (10), (12) it is easy to obtain that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula40"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From Formulas (1), (13) follows the inequality (11). Lemma 2 is proved.</p><p>So we obtain geometric by t convergence rate of the density <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the density of the uniform distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreover, due to (6) with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula41"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence when we have n-periodic initial conditions, the characteristic time mixing with anomalous diffusion is reduced to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> times.</p><p>Fractional Brownian motion</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a fractional Brownian motion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref11">11</xref>] . Fractional Brownian motion with Hurst parameter a is Gaussian process with zero mean and covariance function</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula42"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The process of fractional Brownian motion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the condition of self-similarity (4) and has a symmetric density distributions of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Using the process <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we define reflected from the cut ends<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the process <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Lemma 2. When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the following relation is valid:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula43"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Fix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and denote</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula44"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x147.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>remark that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula45"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x148.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Formula (1) and the theorem on the differentiability of a series of the functions compute the derivative</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula46"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Differentiability of a series of functions standing in the right part of the equality follows from the absolute convergence of the series I.</p><p>Put <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in virtue of Formula (16) the number I can be represented in the form<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Compute the derivative of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula47"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x153.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Highlight on the real axis <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the following segments:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula48"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x155.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In virtue of (18) run inequalities:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula49"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x156.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula50"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula51"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x158.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In accordance with the issued for the segment of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> inequalities we get:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula52"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x160.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula53"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x161.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula54"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Designate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and we deduce from the last inequalities following relationships:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula55"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x164.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula56"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x165.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula57"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x166.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From them it is easy to obtain:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula58"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x167.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula59"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x168.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula60"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x169.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula61"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x170.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula62"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x171.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula63"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x172.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, we have:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula64"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x173.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula65"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x174.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula66"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x175.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula67"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula68"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x177.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula69"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x178.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and so the sum <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x179.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the inequalities:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula70"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>how do we get that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula71"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Because of Formula (18), the resultant inequality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the definition of the sums<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x182.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we find:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula72"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x184.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, the following inequality holds<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which leads to the relation (11). Lemma 2 is proved.</p><p>Theorem 3. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the following inequality holds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula73"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x187.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Because of Formula (1) equalities <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take place. Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In Lemma 2 the following inequality holds<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x189.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula74"><graphic  xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x191.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and hence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Here we come to the statement of Theorem 3.</p><p>Because of Formula (6) from inequality (19) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.83036-formula75"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x193.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence for n-periodic initial conditions the characteristic time mixing under fractional Brownian motion is reduced to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="//html.scirp.org/file/5-1721125x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> times.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Obtained in the present work, an upper estimate of the convergence rate of the density function of a multidimensional fractional Brownian motion with reflection at the boundaries of a square is not exponential as in the usual Brownian motion or a stable process with independent increments. Apparently this is due to the fact that the multidimensional fractional Brownian motion models the processes with chaotic behavior [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>In the work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.83036-ref12">12</xref>] , it is considered a model of fractional Brownian motion with dependent components. However, this model fails to obtain the corresponding results in the case of periodic initial conditions. But in the case of independent components multidimensional Brownian motion satisfies the statement of Theorem 3.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The paper is supported by RFBR, project 17-07-00177.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tsitsiashvili, G. (2018) One Dimensional Random Motion on Segment with Reflecting Edges and Dependent Increments. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 6, 488-497. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2018.63045</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.83036-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, S., Yu, L.P., Ren, J.L., Xie, X., Li, X.P., Xu, Y., Zhao, G.F., Li, P.Z., Yang, F.Q., Ren, Y. and Liaw, P.K. (2016) Self-Similar Random Process and Chaotic Behavior. In Serrated Flow of High Entropy Alloys. Scientific Reports, 6, Article Number: 29798. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29798</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caroll, R., Lee, C., Tsai, C.-W., Yeh, J.-W., Antonaglia, J., Brinkman, B.A.W., et al. (2015) Experiments and Model for Serration Statistics in Low-Entropy, Medium-Entropy, and High-Entropy Alloys. Scientific Reports, 5, Article Number: 16997. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Z.J., et al. (2015) Experiments and Model for Serration Statistics in Low-Entropy, Medium Entropy Alloys. Nat Commun, 6. PMC free article.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Youssef, K.M., Zaddach, A.J., Niu, C.N., Irving, D.L. and Koch, C.C. (2015) A Novel Low Density, High-Hardness, High Entropy Alloy with Close Packed Single-Phase Nanocrystalline Structures. Materials Research Letters, 3, No. 2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsitsiashvili</surname><given-names> G.Sh. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2015</year>)<article-title>Characteristic Time of Diffusive Mixing in Cube with Reflecting Edges</article-title><source> American Journal of Modern Physics</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 81</fpage>-<lpage>87</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsitsiashvili, G.Sh. (2013) Anomalous Diffusion on Finite Interval. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 191, 582-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-013-1342-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsitsiashvili</surname><given-names> G.Sh. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Convergence of Fractional Brownian Motion with Reflections to Uniform Distribution</article-title><source> Applied Mathematical Sciences</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 2103</fpage>-<lpage>2112</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vladimirov, V.S. (1967) Equations of Mathematical Physics. Nauka, Moscow. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Embrechts, P. and Maejima, M. (2000) An Introduction to the Theory of Self-Similar Stochastic Processes. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 14, 1399. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979200001047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uchaikin, V.V. (2002) Multidimensional Symmetric Anomalous Diffusion. Chemical Physics, 284, 507-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00676-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mikosch, T., et al. (2002) Is Network Traffic Approximated by Stable Levy Motion or Fractional Brownian Motion? Annals of Applied Probability, 12, 23-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.83036-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tsitsiashvili</surname><given-names> G.Sh. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2017</year>)<article-title>Multivariate Fractional Brownian Motion in Cube with Reflecting Edges</article-title><source> Applied Mathematical Sciences</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 2315</fpage>-<lpage>2324</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>