<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2018.92006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-82401</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nutritional Potential of Two Leafy Vegetables &lt;i&gt;Leptadenia hastata&lt;/i&gt; Decne and &lt;i&gt;Senna obtusifolia&lt;/i&gt; Link Consumed in Senegal
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nicolas</surname><given-names>Cyrille Ayessou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mady</surname><given-names>Cissé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mathieu</surname><given-names>Gueye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cheikh</surname><given-names>Ndiaye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Codou</surname><given-names>Mar Diop</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>1Laboratoire d’Electrochimie et des Procédés Membranaires, Centre d’Etudes sur la Sécurité Alimentaire et les Molécules Fonctionnelles-Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institut Fondamental d’Afrique Noire Cheikh Anta Diop, Département de Botanique et Géologie Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Laboratoire d’Electrochimie et des Procédés Membranaires, Centre d’Etudes sur la Sécurité Alimentaire et les Molécules Fonctionnelles-Ecole Supérieure Polytechnique, Université Cheikh Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Laboratoire des Biotoxines et Contr&amp;amp;ocirc;le des Aliments, Institut de Technologie Alimentaire (ITA) Route des Pères Maristes, Dakar, Senegal</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>nayessou@yahoo.fr(NCA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>02</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>77</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>2,</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2018</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11,</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2018</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  
    This study focused on two woody leafy vegetables 
   <em>Leptadenia hastata</em> Decne and 
   <em>Senna obtusifolia</em> Link, commonly consumed in Senegal. Leaves were col-lected from three regions. Then, proximate analyses and micronutrients were carried out to evaluate their nutritional values. Results revealed that protein level of 
   <em>S. obtusifolia</em> (SO) is richer (21.75%) than 
   <em>Leptadenia hastata</em> (LH) (18.16%). The cellulose and carbohydrate contents of the two vegetable’s leaves are in the same order except those of LH from Widou which are less rich in cellulose (8.31%) and richest in carbohydrate (6.35%). These leaves are also good sources of various mineral elements and especially iron. Leaves of LH appear to be richer in iron and magnesium, while SO appears to be richer in calcium. Vitamin C intakes of SO leaves are better than those of LH and respectively range from 142 to 196.5 and 22.5 to 159.5 mg/100 g. According to the use of this leafy vegetable by the populations, a domestication opportunity is thus justified to ensure availability and accessibility of these significant sources of micronutrients. 
  
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Leptadenia hastata&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Senna obtusifolia&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Woody Leafy Vegetables</kwd><kwd> Nutritional Values</kwd><kwd> Domestication</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Human populations of the western Sahel depend upon a number of wild plant foods to satisfy a substantial part of their nutritional requirements and this dependency increases during drought times [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref2">2</xref>] . Leafy vegetables occupy a significant place in this diet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref5">5</xref>] , because of their nutritional intake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref8">8</xref>] . These leafy vegetables are mostly herbaceous species but some also come from the Woody [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref10">10</xref>] . Some are also used for oral therapeutic purposes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref12">12</xref>] and thus fulfill a dual food and therapeutic function.</p><p>In Senegal, the most commonly exploited parts of species are respectively leaf (40%), roots (20%), and bark (13.3%) ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref3">3</xref>] ). Lepatadenia hastata and Senna obtusifolia are two leafy vegetables very well distributed in Senegal but consumed by a weak fringe of the population. Leaves of L. hastata are used as fodder in most regions while they are very consumed by indigenous ethnic groups of the K&#233;dougou region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). In contrast, S. obtusifolia is widely known by several Senegalese ethnic groups and accompanies the millet couscous dish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref3">3</xref>] . In a context of integrated local development, a policy, involved by WHO is the use of local resources. Some results are available on the leaves composition of L. hastata from Burkina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref5">5</xref>] , Niger [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref13">13</xref>] , Uganda [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref14">14</xref>] and those of S. obtusifolia from Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref16">16</xref>] . Neither nutritional composition of L. hastata nor S. obtusifolia’s ones from Senegal area are available. Thus, the objectives of this work is to provide nutritional information on these two plant species consumed in Senegal in order to promote them and give them a better place in the diet of the populations.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Materials</title><p>Three batches of Leptadenia hastata and two of Sesbania obtusifolia leaves were</p><p>consecutively harvested and sampled in three regions of Senegal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>): K&#233;dougou, Bakel and Widou (Ferlo). Young leaves were sampling during the dry season (March and April) of 2017 and 2012. They were collected and sun- dried in rural areas and conveyed to the laboratory. Drying is continued at 75˚C for 24 hours. The whole intact leaves are ground and finely homogenized on a 500 μm sieve. Each of leaves samples was analyzed in triplicate and the results are reported relative to the dry matter.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Major Macronutrient Determinations</title><p>Analyses for protein, cellulose, total carbohydrate and ashes (total mineral) were carried out according to the procedure described in the AFNOR standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref17">17</xref>] . Total carbohydrate was obtained using Luff-Schrool’s method while cellulose is checked by method NF ISO 6865. Nitrogen determination was accomplished by the Kjeldhal method (NF 03-050 standard) and proteins were calculated using 5.7 as coefficient. The total minerals were determined after 3 hours incineration at 550˚C (V76-101 standard).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Minor and Specific Nutrients</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Ascorbic Acid</title><p>10 g. of leaves powder was dissolved in metaphosphoric acid solution dilued in 4% distilled water (Metaphosphoric acid ~65% HPO<sub>3</sub> basis from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) to extract the ascorbic acid. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000 g for 15 min. A second extraction was conducted after removing supernatant. All supernatants were added before the determination of total ascorbic. Analysis was completed using Thermo Scientific HPLC 1000 SCM (with Licrospher 100 RP-18 column from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Illkirch, France).</p><p>Separations were achieved using a mobile phase of 0.01% isocratic sulfuric acid (from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). The volume injection was 10 &#181;L. The comparison was carried out using external calibration between 10 and 200 mg/L L-Ascorbic acid (L-Ascorbic acid A5960 BioXtra, ≥ 99.0% from Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) as described by Dhuique-Mayer et al., (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref18">18</xref>] . The calibration curve was linear in the range studied with an accepted correlation coefficient of 0.997 minimum. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined to be 2.4 mg/L.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. β-Caroten</title><p>The content of select lipid-soluble vitamins including vitamin A (as carotenoids) was determined using HPLC 1100 Agilent. The solvent extraction was a mixture of ethanol/hexane (4:3 v/v) with CaCO<sub>3</sub> and 0.1% of butylhydroxytoluen (added as an antioxidant). 0.5 g of dried leaves powder was mixed with 20 mL of extract solution and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 15 min at 4˚C. A second extraction was conducted with 20 mL of extract solution. All supernatants were recovered and evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. After evaporation to dryness, samples were solubilized in a mixture of dichloromethane/Tert-Butyl methyl ether/methanol. Separations were carried out by gradient elution with water (solution A)/methanol (solution B)/Tert-Butyl methyl ether (solution C) as follows: initial conditions 40%A/60% B; 0 - 5 min, 20% A/80% B; 5 - 10 min, 4%A/81% B/15% C; 10 - 60 min, 4% A/11% B/85% C; 60 - 71 min, 100% B 71 - 72 min, and back to the initial conditions for re-equilibration. To record chromatograms with Agilent 1100, a detector at 350, 400, 450 and 470 nm was used. Comparisons were carried out using authentic standards as reported by Dhuique-Mayer et al. (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref18">18</xref>] with limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ), respectively 0.035 and 0.119 mg/100 g sample for vitamin A. All reagents used for these analyses were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA); HPLC Agilent 1100, diode array detector (Agilent France, Massy, France); Column YMC C<sub>30</sub> (250 &#215; 4.6 mm; 5 &#181;m, YMC, Dislaken, Germany).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Mineral Determination</title><p>A 500 mg portion of leaves powder was incinerated at 500˚C, weighed and desilicated with 4 mL of 40% hydrofluoric acid from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). The obtained solution was then evaporated at 90˚C to dryness. The residue was mixed with 50 mL distilled water followed by filtration. Detection of sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, copper, zinc and iron were realized using inductive coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, Varian Vista) with coupled charge device detector (Agilent France, Massy). Quantification of element concentrations was carried out using specific calibration of 5 points for each element in the range 0 to 1000 &#181;g/L (Mineral standard from Fisons Scientific Equipment, Loughborough, England). The limits of quantification (LOQ) related to samples were 0.05 mg/100 g for Ca, K, Na, Mg P and 0.005 mg/100 g for Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>All analyses were carried out in triplicate and the data were analyzed using excel software.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Maronutrients composition of this two species show a good level of protein (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) but S. obtusifolia (SO) is richer (21.75%) than Leptadenia hastata (LH) (18.16%). The cellulose contents of the two vegetable’s leaves are in the same order (on average 11.38 for LH and 15.45% for SO) except those of LH from Widou which are less rich (8.31%). The levels of sugars appear equivalent between the two species except the leaves of LH from Widou. The comparison of the data overall shows a good uniformity of results within each species regardless of the origin of the samples. However, we note the case of LH leaves from Widou, whose low cellulose content is offset by a better carbohydrate content (6.35%); this sugar is essentially made of sucrose. On the other hand, LH is a better source of minerals.</p><p>The ash content that reflects the total mineral content reveals a greater richness of L. hastata than S. obtusifolia. However in detail, the conclusions are not accurate. The two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reveals a strong similarity of the different mineral elements contained in the leaves of both species, despite their provenance (Bakel, K&#233;dougou and Widou) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). These leaves are good sources of various mineral elements and especially iron. Leaves of LH appear to be richer in iron and magnesium while vitamin C intakes of S.O. leaves are better than those of LH and respectively range from 142 to 196.5 and 22.5 to 159.5. These values of vitamin C seem to correspond to the results obtained on 22 leafy vegetables whose range of variation is between 22 and 135 mg/100 g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Comparatively to others legumes, protein levels of SO (21.75% &#177; 9.88%) are relatively close to beans [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref20">20</xref>] and LH are close to Amaranthus hybridus from Nigeria which contain 17.92% protein, 13.80% ashes and 8.61% total fibers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref21">21</xref>] . It also appears that the leaves of L. hastata harvested in Senegal are lower in protein than those of Burkina, thus marking a certain geographical variability. LH leaves collected in Senegal are richer in protein and ash than those in Uganda (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), with 9.96% ash; but the contents of the latter in cellulose are</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition of L. hastata and S. obtusifolia leaves (% DM)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Leptadenia hastata</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Senna obtusifolia</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bakel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K&#233;dougou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widou*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bakel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widou*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.37 &#177; 0.56<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.16 &#177; 2.54<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.96 &#177; 1.13<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.75 &#177; 9.88<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.55 &#177; 1.70<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cellulose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.47 &#177; 1. 31<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.29 &#177; 0.79<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.31 &#177; 0.86<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.63 &#177; 1.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.33 &#177; 9.44<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.01 &#177; 3.33<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.25 &#177;5.97<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.34 &#177; 1.92<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.43 &#177; 0.21<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24 &#177; 0.73<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sugar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71 &#177; 0.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47 &#177; 0.22<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.35 &#177; 0.39<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38 &#177; 0.15<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.51&#177; 0.41<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saccharose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.58 &#177; 0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8 &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31 &#177; 0.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Micronutrients composition of L. hastata and S. obtusifolia leaves (mg/100 g DM)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species (mg/100 g DM) (mg/100 g DM)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Leptadenia hastata (N = 3)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Senna obtusifolia (N = 3)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elements</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bakel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K&#233;dougou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bakel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widou</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >322 &#177; 2.13<sup>a</sup><sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213 &#177; 0.15<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302 &#177; 1.17<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >425 &#177; 0.08<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >292 &#177; 0.70<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2042 &#177; 11.49<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2417 &#177; 87.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1956 &#177; 13.6<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1749 &#177; 91.8<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1968 &#177; 2.4<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3248 &#177; 14.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3876 &#177; 17.49<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2385 &#177; 62.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4594 &#177; 15.02<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2482 &#177; 56.5<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800 &#177; 29.6<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >578 &#177; 13.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >688 &#177; 18<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >383 &#177; 68<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >342 &#177; 62<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4 &#177; 0.2<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.31 &#177; 0.2<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.33 &#177; 0.2<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.76 &#177; 0.01<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.70 &#177; 0.06<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91 &#177; 0.35<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05 &#177;0.41<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35 &#177; 0.39<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11 &#177; 0.27<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8 &#177; 0.06<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119.95 &#177; 5.16<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.79&#177; 65.62<sup> b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.4 &#177; 25.04<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.41 &#177; 6.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84 &#177; 15.2<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.48 &#177; 4.06<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.51 &#177; 0.76<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77&#177; 2.24<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.31 &#177; 0.32<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96 &#177; 0.65<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92 &#177; 0.93<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.87 &#177; 0.89<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.3&#177; 0.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9 &#177; 0.65<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81 &#177; 0.29<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >β-carot&#232;ne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.95 &#177; 0.75<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7 &#177; 1.1<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.8 &#177; 0.3<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.85 &#177; 2.6<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5 &#177; 0.25<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamine C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 &#177; 11.31<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.5 &#177; 12.02<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159.5 &#177; 84.15<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142 &#177; 56.57<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >196.5 &#177; 31.82<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are means of three (3) individual measurements &#177; standard deviation. Means in each column followed by different superscript letters are significantly different (Tukey’s HSD, p &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Proximate composition of different source of Leptadenia hastata</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elements</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Actual average (Senegal)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Freiberger et al., 1998 (Niger)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref1">1</xref>] (Niger)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref14">14</xref>] (Uganda)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg/100 g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >(mg/kg)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213 - 322<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1956 - 2417</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30421</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2385 - 3876</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >578 - 800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4696</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.31 - 21.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Traces</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91 - 1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.4 - 119.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.77 - 8.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.87 - 2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>higher (24.06%). However, the protein content of leaves from Niger found by several authors is mixed and varies between 14% and 22.8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref13">13</xref>] . Concerning the composition of the major elements of Senna obtusifolia, the leaves of Senegal display higher levels of protein and cellulose than leaves of Nigerian revealed by Sudi et al., (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref15">15</xref>] and Tambari et al., (2015) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref16">16</xref>] . These differences in results had been explained in accordance with the age and the season of collection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Comparing mineral content, Senegal’s LH samples are significantly richer than those from Niger and Uganda (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). These remarks remain valid for Senna obtusifolia.</p><p>The levels of micronutrients such as manganese, copper and zinc are important to report because they are of the order of mg/100 g whereas they are generally expressed in mg/kg (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). According to their physiological importance, these micronutrients will be of nutritional and health interests for populations that consume those leaves.</p><p>These results encourage the more frequent use of these two leafy vegetables by populations where dietary habits permit since the consumption of leafy vegetables is linked to the traditions and dietary patterns of each ethnic and socio-economic group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref22">22</xref>] . Indeed LH remains popular with the indigenous people of K&#233;dougou who consider it like a main source of vegetables during the lean season in default of vegetable market gardening. In the area of Bakel and Widou, however, these leaves of LH are rather reserved exclusively for livestock. The knowledge of the composition of these leaves seems to be a major nutritional argument to promote their consumption. They are good sources of supplementation in essential mineral elements during periods when food is reduced to subsidence. In addition, some leafy vegetables are consumed for therapeutic purposes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref12">12</xref>] . For example, leaves of LH contain two essential fatty acids (linoleic and α-linolenic acids) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref14">14</xref>] with the protective properties of the cardiovascular system. Other studies reveal their galactogenic and purgative properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref24">24</xref>] , antitumorals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref25">25</xref>] and anti inflammatory and analgesic activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref26">26</xref>] . A domestication opportunity is thus justified to ensure availability and accessibility of these significant sources of micronutrients. Improving this availability can be ensured by simple technical preservation such as bleaching and drying [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.82401-ref27">27</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The nutritional intake of Leptadenia hastata and Senna obtusifolia in the diet is significant from the point of view of mineral elements. To overcome the difficulties of availability of these two leaf vegetables during the lean season, domestication would be an appropriate response to contribute for food security of the populations.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was conducted with technical support of CESAM-RESCIF and financial support from:</p><p>1) USAID Program (USAID-YAAJEENDE, p. 255: Project of Agricultural and Nutritional Development for Food Security in Senegal).</p><p>2) LabEx DRIIHM through CNRS financial.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ayessou, N.C., Ciss&#233;, M., Gueye, M., Ndiaye, C. and Diop, C.M. (2018) Nutritional Potential of Two Leafy Vegetables Leptadenia hastata Decne and Senna obtusifolia Link Consumed in Senegal. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 9, 77-85. https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2018.92006</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.82401-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cook, J.A., Vanderjagt, D.J., Pastuszyn, A., Mounkaila, G., Glew, R.S., Millson, M. and Glew, R.H. (2000) Nutrient and Chemical Composition of 13 Wild Plant Foods of Niger. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 13, 83-92. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.1999.0843</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueye, M., Ayessou, N.C., Koma, S., Diop, S., Akpo, L.E. and Samb, P.I. (2014) Wild Fruits Traditionally Gathered by the Malinke Ethnic Group in the Edge of Niokolo Koba Park (Senegal). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 1306-1317. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.59144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gueye, M. and Diouf, M. (2007) Traditional Leafy Vegetables in Senegal: Diversity and Medicinal Uses. African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines, 4, 469-475.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nordeide, M.B., Hatloy, A., Folling, M., Lied, E. and Oshang, A. (1996) Nutrient Composition and Nutritional Importance of Green Leaves and Wild Food Resources in an Agricultural District, Koutiala, in Southern Mali. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 47, 455-468.  
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3109/09637489609031874</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thiombiano, D.N.E., Lamien, N., Dibong, S.D. and Boussim, I.J. (2010) Etat des peuplements des espèces ligneuses de soudure des communes rurales de Pobé-Mengao et de Nobéré (Burkina Faso). Journal of Animal &amp; Plant Sciences, 9, 1104-1116.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Yang, R.Y., Lin, S. and Kuo, G. (2009) Nutritional Contributions of Important African Indigenous Vegetables. In: Charlie, M.S., Margaret, W.P. and Axel, W.D.E., Eds., African Indigenous Vegetables in Urban Agriculture, Earthscan, London, 105-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uusiku, N.P., Oelofse, A., Duodu, K.G., Bester, M.G. and Faber, M. (2010) Nutritional Value of Leafy Vegetables of Sub-Saharan Africa and Their Potential Contribution to Human Health: A Review. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23, 499-509. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2010.05.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diouf, M., Gueye, M. and Samb, P.I. (2017) Utilisation des paramètres biochimiques pour la détermination de la date optimale de récolte des feuilles de bissap (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) au Sénégal. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 11, 2306-2314. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v11i5.28</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Millogo-Rasolodimby, J. (2001) L’Homme, le climat et les ressources alimentaires végétales en périodes de crises de subsistance au Burkina Faso au cours du 20 ème siècle. Thèse d’Etat en Biologie et Ecologie Végétales. Université de Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 249 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gning, O.N., Sarr, O., Gueye, M., Akpo, L.E. and Ndiaye, P.M. (2013) Valeur socio-économique de l’arbre en milieu malinké (Khossanto, Sénégal). Journal Applied Bioscience, 70, 5617-5631. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/jab.v70i1.98765</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nikiema, J.B., Vanhaelen-Fastre, R. and Vanhaelen, M. (2001) Effects of Antiinflammatory Triterpenes Isolated from Leptadenia hastata Latex on Keratinocyte Proliferation. Phytotherapy Research, 15, 131-134. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.700</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nabatanzi, A. and Nakalembe, I. (2016) Wild Food Plants Used by People Living with HIV/AIDS in Nakisunga Sub-County, Uganda. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 16, 11310-11330. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.76.15720</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freiberger, C.E., Vanderjagt, D.J., Pastuszyn, A., Glew, R.S., Mounkaila, G., Millson, M. and Glew R.H. (1998) Nutrient Content of the Edible Leaves of Seven Wild Plants from Niger. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 53, 57-69. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008080508028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anywar, G., Oryem-Origa, H. and Kamatenesi-Mugisha, M. (2017) Proximate Nutrient Composition of Some Wild Edible Medicinal Plants from Uganda. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 17, 12215-12226. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.79.15590</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sudi, I.Y., Ksgbiya, D.M., Muluh, E.K. and Clement, A. (2011) Nutritional and Phytochemical Screening of Senna obtusifolia Indigenous to Mubi, Nigeria. Advances Applied Science Research, 2, 432-437.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tambari, U., Aliero, B.L., Muhammad, S. and Hassan, L.G. (2015) Interaction Effect of Season, Habitat and Leaf Age on Proximate Composition of Senna occidentalis and Senna obtusifolia Leaves Grown in Fadama and Upland Locations in Sokoto, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 23, 39-44. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.4314/njbas.v23i1.6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AFNOR (1982) Produits dérivés des fruits et légumes, jus de fruits. édition Afnor, Paris, 327 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhuique-Mayer, C., Tbatou, M., Carail, M., Caris-Veyrat, C., Dornier, M. and Amiot, M.J. (2007) Thermal Degradation of Antioxidant Micronutrients in Citrus Juice: Kinetics and Newly Formed Compounds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 4209-4216. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0700529</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahman, K.M.M., Rahman, M.M., Islam, M.S. and Begum, M.M. (2006) A Simple UV Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Vitamin C Content in Various and Vegetables at Sylhet Area in Bangladesh. Journal of Biological Sciences, 6, 388-392. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2006.388.392</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souci, S.W., Fachmann, W. and Kraut, H. (2008) Food Composition and Nutrition Tables. 7ème edition, MedPharm, Stuttgart, 743-1238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Akubugwo, I.E., Obasi, N.A., Chinyere, G.C. and Ugbogu, A.E. (2007) Nutritional and Chemical Value of Amaranthus hybridus L. Leaves from Afikpo, Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 6, 2833-2839. 
&lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2452</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Diouf, M., Diop, M., L&amp;ocirc;, C., Dramé, K.A., Sène, E., Ba, C.O., Gueye, M. and Faye, B. (1999) Prospection de légumes feuilles traditionnels de type africain au Sénégal. In: Phytothérapie, J.A.C., Hweya, and Eyzaguirre, P.B., Eds., The Biodiversity of Traditional Leafy Vegetables, IPGRI, 111-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Kerharo, J. and Adam J.G. (1974) La pharmacopée Sénégalaise Traditionnelle: Plantes médicinales et toxiques. Ed. Vigot frères, 1011 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arbonnier, M. (2002) Arbres, arbustes et lianes des zones sèches d'Afrique de l'Ouest. 2è édition, CIRAD-MNHN, Paris, 573 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aquino, R., Peluso, G., De Tommasi, N., De Simone, F. and Pizza, C. (1996) New Polyoxypregnane Ester Derivatives from Leptadenia hastata. Journal of Natural Products, 29, 555-564. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.1021/np960251e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarkiyayi, S., Umaru, H.A. and Onche, H.O. (2015) Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Effect of Leptadenia hastata on Albino Rats. American Journal of Biochemistry, 5, 35-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.82401-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chamba, M.V.M., Ishmael, D. and Sitolo-Banda, G.C. (2017) Effects of Blanching Time and Dehydration Condition on Moisture and Ascorbic Acid Retention in Tender Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) Leaves. African Journal of Food Science, 11, 273-277. &lt;/br&gt;https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2017.1610</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>