<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JHRSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2328-4862</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jhrss.2017.54021</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JHRSS-81007</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Gladson Nwokah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Joyce</surname><given-names>Tamunosaki Briggs</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Marketing, Faculty of Management Sciences, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>nwokah.gladson@ust.edu.ng(NGN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>11</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>238</fpage><lpage>257</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>14,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>9,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The purpose of this study was to empirically investigate how Internal Marketing relates with Marketing Effectiveness in the Hotel Industry in Rivers State. The target population of this study is the twenty hotels listed under the Best Port Harcourt, Rivers State Hotel Specials and Deals of Tripadvisor online. Since, our study is organization based, key informants from the twenty hotels in Port Harcourt Rivers State, Nigeria constituted the sample of this study. The three key informants are: Customer relationship manager, marketing manager, and, food and beverages manager giving a total of hundred and twenty-five respondents who were administered the copies of the questionnaire. Upon retrieval and data cleaning, 100 copies were subjected to Data analysis. Data analyses were aided by the use of SPSS version 20.0 and hypotheses were tested using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. After the data analysis, it was revealed that: Employee Job Satisfaction as a dimension of Internal Marketing relates very strongly and positively with Adequate Marketing Information, moderately and negatively with Customer Philosophy, and strongly and negatively with Adequate Strategic Orientation as measures of Marketing Effectiveness. We therefore concluded that there is a strong and positive relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction as a dimension of Internal Marketing and Adequate Marketing Information, moderate and negative relationship with Customer Philosophy and strong and negative relationship with Adequate Strategic Orientation as measures of Marketing Effectiveness. Based on the findings and conclusions we recommended that, in view of the fact that there exist a strong and positive relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction as a dimension of Internal Marketing and Adequate Marketing Information as a measure of Marketing Effectiveness, Hotel Industry in Rivers State should see that their physical facilities, equipment and communication materials are improved.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Internal-Marketing</kwd><kwd> Marketing Effectiveness</kwd><kwd> Hotels</kwd><kwd> Rivers-State</kwd><kwd> Nigeria</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hotel services are services that meet hotel guest needs for accommodation, food and beverages, and additional services that are provided and for which payment is received in return. New social values on demand are vital to hotel industry employees, because different hotel guests display different lifestyles at different time and ways. Therefore, hotel marketers should center on service areas that creativity is obvious and shown in their individual associates and understanding between staff and guests. The employees of the hotel industry are in charge of carrying out the service process, resolving customer problems. Thus, it is important for the employees to be satisfied with their jobs and in turn satisfy the hotel guests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref1">1</xref>] . Today internal marketing is one area manager face difficulty in terms of managing their employees. Sadly, research shows internal marketing has received little or no attention from scholars or managers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref2">2</xref>] . Several studies on internal marketing have been carried out like that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref3">3</xref>] . They carried out their study in the United Kingdom. They used customer orientation and customer satisfaction, employee motivation and satisfaction, interfunctional coordination and integration, marketing-like approach to the above, and implementation of specific corporate or functional strategies to measure internal marketing. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref4">4</xref>] measured internal marketing using: internal communication, staff training, job satisfaction, appraisals and feedbacks and customer consciousness.</p><p>Also many studies have been conducted on Marketing Effectiveness like that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref6">6</xref>] ; used four basic dimensions to measure marketing effectiveness. They are Corporate, Competitive, Customers and Exogenous factors. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref2">2</xref>] posited that marketing effectiveness has two components. They are adoption of the marketing concept and the implementation of the concept. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref7">7</xref>] , the measure of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref9">9</xref>] is seen as one of the best marketing effectiveness measures. Kotler used five components to measure marketing effectiveness. They are customer philosophy, integrated marketing organization, adequate marketing information, strategic orientation and operational efficiency. It is evident from the discussion above, that several studies in the area of Internal Marketing have been carried out [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref12">12</xref>] and also Marketing Effectiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref9">9</xref>] and that of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref7">7</xref>] . Yet, despite all these studies something remains lacking. It is clear that no one in Rivers State, Nigeria that I know of have studied the relationship between Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness. Limited research is done in this area, thus there is a considerable gap that exists in academic knowledge. But to fill this gap, we will concentrate our research on the hotel industry, which leads to new knowledge. The nexus between internal marketing and marketing effectiveness is an important one. The various dimensions of the internal marketing are likely to relate with the various measures of marketing effectiveness. The problem this research is designed to investigate is: How do the various dimensions of Internal Marketing relate with the various measures of Marketing Effectiveness?</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Theoretical Framework</title>Social Exchange Theory (SET)<p>The Social Exchange Theory (SET) as propounded in 1961 by George Homoms is based on the importance of negotiated exchanges in human relationship between parties (especially in workplace) involving communications, cost/benefits, alternative and obligations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref13">13</xref>] . This theory focuses on the behavior of individual (social behavior) international which may result in social and economic outcomes in the market place [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref14">14</xref>] . The process of social exchange breads satisfaction when fair rewards are given in return or as benefits. Homoms ideal social exchange theory is governed by the belief of reinforcement principles built from the proposition of “success; stimulus; and deprivation-satiation”. The application of Homoms social exchange theory is eminent in the building of the social structures of internal marketing to reward and satisfy the employees (internal customers) who would in turn reflect commitment and satisfaction in their job [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref15">15</xref>] . The social exchange theory is strong enough and hoped to illuminate, to offset interactive institutional barriers of a more complex organizational behavior and the effective management of internal customers. This theory no doubt is also a sure way and a new route to fulfilling the needs of the employees to be service-oriented in contact with external customers. Generally speaking, the adoption and development of social exchange theory in this research steams from the heels of employee motivation and job satisfaction for the provision of quality service when interfaced with customers. This informs the bass for adoption and application of this theory (SET) in this research as a contributor to organization-stakeholder relationship and relationship marketing.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Concepts of Internal Marketing (IM)</title><p>A 2012 review by Mousavi-Davoodi and Kaur argued that the concept of IM encompasses the employees, “the job as a product, which should satisfy the needs and requirements of customers” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref16">16</xref>] . Internal marketing is also viewed from the perspective of internalization of the relationship amongst members at organizational levels creating service-oriented/customer-centric approach within employees to coming in contact with customers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref17">17</xref>] . IM uses marketing approach to motivate employees who are viewed as internal customers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] , to produce a more customer-centric employees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref19">19</xref>] . According to Saeedinejad [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref20">20</xref>] internal marketing represents a comprehensive process of managing and merger of complex/multiple tasks of marketing within the business environment, equipping the employees and motivated to work. Indeed IM instills customer orientation among the employee by giving necessary support to enable teamwork among the organizations human resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref20">20</xref>] from attracting, developing, motivating and retention of key personnel in a conducive work environment. The IM process addresses problems associated with both effectiveness and efficiency of internal services, customer orientation, market orientation, and implementation of programmes and routines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>In fact, IM is the market orientation which adopts marketing principle in the organization with the aim to establish company’s values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref22">22</xref>] . This definition certainly is inclusive of activities which enhances internal communication chain and a host of cross-functional coordination to institute an effective marketing performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Internal marketing was posited first as a key to the problem of consistently delivering high quality service [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref24">24</xref>] . Employees are seen as customer, their jobs as internal products and the organization endeavours to offer jobs. Nevertheless, in spite of this, very few organisations in reality put into practice the concept.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref25">25</xref>] posited internal marketing as inward turning of traditional marketing techniques. Also, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref27">27</xref>] saw internal marketing as to attract, develop, motivate and retain employees that are competent through job-products that satisfy their needs. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref28">28</xref>] defined internal marketing as using a marketing perspective to manage human resources of an organisation. Furthermore, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref20">20</xref>] defined internal marketing as the work organisation performed in terms of training and motivating its internal market to work as a team to satisfy their external customers.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Dimensions of Internal Marketing</title><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref4">4</xref>] posited that effective internal marketing will lead to effective external marketing. According to him internal marketing begins with the thought that employees of the organisation are the first market.</p><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref28">28</xref>] measured internal marketing using: internal communication, staff training, job satisfaction, appraisals and feedbacks and customer consciousness. Also, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref7">7</xref>] carried out a research in the United Kingdom. They measured Internal Marketing using employee motivation and employee satisfaction, customer orientation and customer satisfaction, interfunctional coordination and integration, marketing-like approach to the above and the implementation of specific functional strategies.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Employee Job Satisfaction</title><p>Employee Job satisfaction is the employees feelings they have about their job [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref29">29</xref>] . Gounaris (2008) argued that employees’ satisfaction shows on the external customers’ consequential increased profitability. He saw employee job satisfaction as pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from one’s evaluation of job experiences.</p><p>The nature of job satisfaction shows that employee is likely to continue with a job that is satisfying and leave a job which is dissatisfying.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Interfunctional Coordination</title><p>Interfunctional coordination involves the coordination of the organizations employees and other resources to create superior customer value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref11">11</xref>] . According to Kohli &amp; Jaworski (1990), marketing is not the task of a marketing department alone but the coordination of all other departments to create superior customer value. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref17">17</xref>] posited that internal marketing sees employees as internal customers. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref21">21</xref>] argued that the coordination of the different functions of the organisation results in greater efficiency. Marketing requires inter-departmental teamwork and information sharing and resources. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref23">23</xref>] saw interfunctional coordination as teamwork between the diverse departments in the organisation. Interfunctional coordination allows an organisation to exchange information efficiently among its internal units. That is, it captures the tendency of different departments to hold different and contradictory views and put away functional interests for the benefit of the entire organisation. According to them all departments in the organization ought to be responsive to all other department’s needs.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Concept of Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>Marketing effectiveness concept first came into existence in the 1990s. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref30">30</xref>] marketing effectiveness posited that managers should have adequate information and distributes appropriate resources to different market. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] asserted, the original obligation of marketing effectiveness is that managers must identify the primacy of studying the market, distinguish the several opportunities, select the best market to serve and offer superior customer value to satisfy their needs and wants. Furthermore, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref5">5</xref>] argued that organisations that have the marketing effectiveness is high are those that are close to their consumers, have a common set of values and also demonstrate an external market orientation. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref31">31</xref>] agree that companies with high marketing effectiveness operate better when compared with companies that do not have. The competitive environment of business today demands that for organization to be successful to move forward in its selected market segment, there must be implementation of marketing.</p><p>The marketing effectiveness concept has drawn increased attention among academic researchers and business practitioners over the years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref33">33</xref>] posited that only a few organizations completely practice refined marketing. Ultimately, marketing effectiveness differentiate the amateur from the expert in the global market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Measures of Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>Researchers have conducted empirical investigations on marketing effectiveness like the study of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref12">12</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref34">34</xref>] . According to them there are four dimensions of marketing effectiveness: Corporate, Competitive, Customers and Exogenous factors. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref32">32</xref>] posited that the operationalisation of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] is seen as one of the best measures of marketing effectiveness. Kotler in his study stated a combination of five component: customer philosophy, integrated marketing organization, adequate marketing information, strategic orientation and operational efficiency.</p><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. Customer Philosophy</title><p>Consumer’s philosophy according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] is the external center of attention of the organization on the consumer needs and wants and how to monitor the satisfaction of consumers by carrying out consumer’s surveys. Some managers are product-oriented (make good product and sell). Some managers are technology- oriented (get latest technologies and are not interested in the size or customers wants). Some are sales-oriented (get sufficient sales effort and anything can be sold). An organisation is on its way to effective marketing when it begins with the consumer when designing its structure, plans and control.</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Adequate Marketing Information</title><p>Studies have shown that businesses that fail have not obtain and acted upon market information in regards to their product or service [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref34">34</xref>] . Organization without adequate marketing information will not be able to take adequate business decisions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref32">32</xref>] . Thus, executives of the organization need sufficient information to plan and allocate resources correctly to diverse markets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] . The task of information in decision in marketing cannot be challenge bearing in mind that marketing success of the organization depends on the availability and the accuracy of marketing information.</p><p>According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref35">35</xref>] marketing encompass all operations (market research, product selection and design, advertising, pricing) from moving goods and services from point of production to the ultimate users.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3"><title>6.3. Strategic Orientation</title><p>Strategic Orientation is a definite way to build up strategies based on the analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. It generates a number of rational alternatives and provides a prioritisation. Strategic Orientation combines internal analysis of a project (Strengths and Weaknesses) with an external analysis (Opportunities and Threats) to arrive at strategic options from which a choice can be made [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref32">32</xref>] . Therefore, in order to have a sound SWOT analysis of internal and external resources and the function of the organization, the environment needs to be scanned and the institutional setting needs to be analysed.</p><p>Marketing effectiveness rely on management design of a strategy that is profitable out of its philosophy, organization, and information resources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref32">32</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>Internal marketing is vital in increasing organization that is marketing-oriented. In application, internal marketing is concerned above all with communicating, increasing responsiveness, responsibility and unity of purpose. It intend at developing internal and external customer consciousness. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref35">35</xref>] , internal marketing influences the effectiveness of marketing and external marketing programmes.</p><sec id="s7_1"><title>7.1. Employee Job Satisfaction and Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref6">6</xref>] posited that, when employees needs are met it motivates them and make them to remain in the organization and as a result increase their satisfaction and in so doing increase marketing effectiveness and thus increases the possibility of generating external customer satisfaction and loyalty. Satisfaction suggested a more reciprocal relationship with marketing effectiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref32">32</xref>] . In general, employees that are satisfied are likely to be more customer-oriented and thus deliver better customer service [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref35">35</xref>] . The relationship between job satisfaction and customer philosophy study has been carried out by several authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref36">36</xref>] . Their findings showed higher levels of job satisfaction leads to higher degrees of customer philosophy.</p><p>On the other hand, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref31">31</xref>] connects job satisfaction to supervision, adequate marketing information and physical work conditions. Also, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref7">7</xref>] concluded that the quality of leader-member exchange mediated positive relationships between a strategic orientation and leader-rated in-role job performance, leader-rated innovative job performance, and job satisfaction. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref10">10</xref>] , found that strategic orientation strongly relate with employees’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Thus, the following hypotheses were proposed.</p><p>Ho<sub>1</sub> There is no significant relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy.</p><p>Ho<sub>2</sub> There is no significant relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Marketing Information.</p><p>Ho<sub>3</sub> There is no significant relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Strategic Orientation.</p></sec><sec id="s7_2"><title>7.2. Interfunctional Coordination and Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>The literature documents the positive relationship between Interfunctional Coordination and marketing effectiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref19">19</xref>] posited that interfunctional coordination is very important to the orgaanisation. Their findings suggested that interfunctional coordination is significantly and positively related to marketing information systems. Also, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref19">19</xref>] in their research found out that interfunctional coordination relates to the company’s internal climate of marketing effectiveness. Furthermore, Mohammad et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref22">22</xref>] , results show that correlation coefficient between the elements of interfunctional coordination and marketing effectiveness is equal. Thus research hypothesis is confirmed and there is significant relationship between interfunctional coordination and effectiveness of company in market. Thus, the following hypotheses were proposed:</p><p>Ho<sub>4</sub> There is no significant relationship between Interfunctional Coordination on Customer Philosophy.</p><p>Ho<sub>5</sub> There is no significant relationship between Interfunctional Coordination on Adequate Marketing Information.</p><p>Ho<sub>6</sub> There is no significant relationship between Interfunctional Coordination on Strategic Orientation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Operational Framework</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> depicts the researcher’s operationalization of the relationships that exist</p><p>amongst the variables.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Research Design</title><p>This hypothesis testing study adopted a causal investigation to establish a relationship between Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State. The researcher did not manipulate or interfered into the variables under study. The choice of research design is likely to be influenced, as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref36">36</xref>] noted, by purpose of the study, study setting, and unit of analysis of the study. Considering all these, the cross sectional survey research design in a non- contrived (normal or natural) setting (Hotel firms) was adopted. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref36">36</xref>] , the survey research design offers a wide coverage and permits generalizability of research findings. The cross sectional study involves a study at a single time.</p><sec id="s9_1"><title>9.1. Sample and Sampling Procedure</title><p>There are twenty hotels in Port Harcourt whose presence is found online. Thus, the target population in this study is the twenty hotels listed under the Best Port Harcourt, Rivers State Hotel Specials and Deals of Tripadvisor online. Since, our study is organization based, key informants from the twenty hotels in Port Harcourt Rivers State, Nigeria constituted the sample of this study. The five key informants are: Customer relationship manager, marketing manager, food and beverages manager, front office managers, and sales manager giving a total of hundred respondents. The study made use of the primary sources of data (questionnaire) and secondary sources of data (documentary from the mobile networks, internet and library research). The main data collection instrument is the questionnaire. The questionnaire for this study was divided into two sections. The first part generated demographic data while the second part generated data on internal marketing and marketing effectiveness. The questions in part B - D was designed using the 5-point Likert scale (ordinal scale). The copies of the questionnaire were administered to five key informants―Customer relationship manager, marketing manager, food and beverages manager, front office managers, and sales manager of each of the twenty hotels listed under the Best Port Harcourt, Rivers State Hotel Specials and Deals of Tripadvisor online giving a total of one hundred respondents.</p></sec><sec id="s9_2"><title>9.2. Reliability and Validity of Research Instrument</title><p>It is important that at every stage of a research study a reliability and validity test be conducted. Reliability is when the instrument measures what it is meant to measure consistently. Also validity as when the research instrument measures what it is meant to measure. The measuring instrument was given face validity by senior academics within Rivers State University who were given the questionnaire for vetting. With this the final questionnaire was drawn. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref36">36</xref>] the Cronbach Alpha is a good reliability coefficient to prove how fit items in a questionnaire set are interrelated. The Cronbach Alpha Coefficient from the Statistical Package of Social Sciences was also used to test the instrument. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The Reliability of the research instrument with the help of SPSS revealed a very high reliability coefficient for the two variables tested. The results as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> falls within the standard range of 0.7 set by Nunnally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref36">36</xref>] . 5 items were used to measure Internal Marketing and the Cronbach’s Alpha co-efficient of the SPSS output recorded 0.9 meaning there is a correlation amongst the items. Also, 11 items were used to measure Marketing Effectiveness and the Cronbach’s Alpha co-efficient of the SPSS output recorded 0.9 meaning there is a correlation amongst the items in the questionnaire.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s10"><title>10. Findings</title><sec id="s10_1"><title>10.1. Responses from Descriptive Statistics</title>Employee Job Satisfaction as a Dimension of Internal Marketing<p>The items of the dimensions of internal marketing are assessed with the mean and standard deviations. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows Employee Job Satisfaction as a Dimension of Internal Marketing.</p><p>As can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, it appears that hotel workers are very comfortable working in their various places of work as the statistical evidence shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows that hotel employees see their work as positive or pleasurable with</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Reliability test results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cronbach’s Alpha</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Internal Marketing (IM) Marketing Effectiveness (ME)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9 0.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: SPSS Output.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Employee job satisfaction as a dimension of internal marketing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean _ χ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std Dev s</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The hotel employees see their work as positive or pleasurable.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The hotel employees feel a sense of belongings for the organization.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >There are opportunities for career development and the pay scale gives satisfaction.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.502</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: SPSS Output. KEY: _ χ = Mean score; s = Standard deviation.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Inter-functional coordination as a dimension of internal marketing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inter-functional Coordination</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean _ χ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std Dev s</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The hotel is involved in the coordination of personnel and other resources all through the firm to create superior customer value.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.480</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The marketing information of the hotel is made known to other departments and all are concerned in business plans/strategies preparation.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.226</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: SPSS Output.</p><p>the highest mean of 5.00 with 0.000 standard deviation. This is followed by the respondents’ confirmation that their hotels employees feel a sense of belongings for their organization. The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> confirms this with a mean of 4.00 and a standard deviation of 0.00.</p></sec><sec id="s10_2"><title>10.2. Inter-Functional Coordination as a Dimension of Internal Marketing</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows Inter-functional coordination as a Dimension of Internal Marketing.</p><p>As can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, it appears that marketing information of the hotel is made known to other departments and all are concerned in business plans/ strategies preparation as the statistical evidence shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> with the highest mean of 4.16 and with 1.226 standard deviation.</p></sec><sec id="s10_3"><title>10.3. Customer Philosophy as a Measure of Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>The indices to measure the dependent variables (Marketing effectiveness) were also assessed. Customer philosophy as a measure of marketing effectiveness was measured with four items.</p><p>As can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, hotel management encouragement of word of mouth communication, customer orientation and placement of importance on business image appear to contribute more as an indicator of customer philosophy as a measure of marketing effectiveness with a standard deviation of 1.100 and mean value of 3.46. This is followed by management in planning its organization takes note of its customers, suppliers, competitors, and its working environment. This scored a mean of 3.02 and a standard deviation of 1.178.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Customer philosophy as a measure of marketing effectiveness</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Customer Philosophy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean _ χ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std Dev s</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The management of the hotel promotes communication through word of mouth, customer orientation and placement of importance on business image.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The hotel management recognizes that to design or provide products/services is vital to serve needs and wants of customer and create diverse strategies for the diverse market segments.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.867</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >In planning its organization, management takes note of its customers, suppliers, competitors, and its working environment.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.178</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Management recognizes the dominance of the market situation and customers’ needs and wants to shape their plans and processes.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.734</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: SPSS Output.</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Adequate marketing information as a measure of marketing effectiveness</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adequate Marketing Information</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean _ χ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Std Dev s</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A lot of effort is spent on measuring the cost-effectiveness of diverse marketing expenditures</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >The management of the hotel knows the potential of sales and profitability of the diverse segments of the market.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.141</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quality information is received by management to conduct effective marketing.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Source: SPSS Output.</p></sec><sec id="s10_4"><title>10.4. Adequate Marketing Information as a Measure of Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>Adequate Marketing Information as a measure of Marketing Effectiveness was measured with three items.</p><p>As can be seen in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>, hotel management understanding of the potential of sales and profitability of the diverse segments of the market appear to contribute more as an indicator of Adequate Marketing Information as a measure of marketing effectiveness with a standard deviation of 0.141 and mean value of 4.96. This is followed by quality information is received by management to conduct effective marketing. This scored a mean of 4.45 and a standard deviation of 0.500.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s11"><title>11. Testing of Research Hypotheses</title><p>This section is aimed at testing the six hypotheses stated in chapter one of this dissertation. Since the descriptive analysis showed a normal distribution of the dependent and independent variables, the Pearson moment correlation is used to run parametric analysis. This is intended to recognize the nature of the relationship between the dimensions</p><sec id="s11_1"><title>11.1. Relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy</title><p>In chapter one of this research work, it was hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> shows the statistical evidence of the relationship between these variables.</p><p>The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> suggests a moderate and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy with −0.379** Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.01 significant levels. This does not support hypothesis one (H<sub>1</sub>), that there is no relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy.</p></sec><sec id="s11_2"><title>11.2. Relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Marketing Information</title><p>In chapter one of this research work, it was hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and adequate marketing information.</p><p>The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> suggests a very strong and positive relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Marketing Information with 0.931** Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.01 significant levels. This again does not agree with hypothesis two (H<sub>2</sub>), that there is no relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and adequate marketing information.</p></sec><sec id="s11_3"><title>11.3. Relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Strategic Orientation</title><p>In chapter one of this research work it was hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Strategic Orientation.</p><p>The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> suggests a strong and negative relationship</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy (n = 100)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Customer Philosophy</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.379** 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Customer Philosophy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.379** 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Marketing Information (n = 100)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adequate Marketing Information</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.931** 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adequate marketing information</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.931** 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Strategic Orientation (n = 100)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strategic Orientation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.773** 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strategic Orientation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.773** 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between inter-functional coordination and customer philosophy (n = 100)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inter-functional Coordination</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Customer Philosophy</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Customer Philosophy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**: Correlation is not significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p><p>between Employee Job Satisfaction and adequate Strategic Orientation with −0.773** Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.01 significant levels. This is not in line with hypothesis three (H<sub>3</sub>), that there is no relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Strategic Orientation.</p></sec><sec id="s11_4"><title>11.4. Relationship between Inter-Functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy</title><p>In chapter one of this research work, it was hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy.</p><p>The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> suggests no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy with 0.023 Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.01 significant levels. This supports hypothesis four (H<sub>4</sub>), that there is no relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy.</p></sec><sec id="s11_5"><title>11.5. Relationship between Inter-Functional Coordination and Adequate Marketing Information</title><p>In chapter one of this research work, it was hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and adequate marketing information.</p><p>The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 suggests a strong and negative relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and adequate marketing information with −0.753** Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.01 significant levels. This</p><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Adequate Marketing Information (n = 100)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Adequate marketing information</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Employee Job Satisfaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.753** 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adequate marketing information</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.753** 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Relationship between inter-functional coordination and strategic orientation (n = 100)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variables</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Inter-functional Coordination</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strategic Orientation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inter-functional Coordination</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.600** 0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strategic Orientation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-tailed)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.600** 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>**: Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p><p>again is not in line with hypothesis five (H<sub>5</sub>), that there is no relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and adequate marketing information.</p></sec><sec id="s11_6"><title>11.6. Relationship between Inter-Functional Coordination and Strategic Orientation</title><p>In chapter one of this research work, it was hypothesized that there is no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Strategic Orientation.</p><p>The statistical evidence in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1 suggests a strong and positive relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Adequate Strategic Orientation with 0.600** Pearson correlation coefficient at 0.01 significant levels. This again does not agree with hypothesis three (H<sub>6</sub>), that there is no relationship between Inter- functional Coordination and Strategic Orientation.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s12"><title>12. Discussion of Findings</title><p>The aim of this section is to discuss the findings from this study.</p><sec id="s12_1"><title>12.1. Employee Job Satisfaction and Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>The finding of this study suggests a moderate and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy. This does not corroborate with previous study. Several studies like the studies of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref22">22</xref>] have been carried out on the relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy. Their findings showed that when employee job satisfaction level is high, it encourages them to have higher Customer Philosophy. Also, when internal marketing i.e. practice effectively in the organization, it leads to effective marketing and external marketing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref13">13</xref>] . According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref19">19</xref>] , when employees needs are fulfilled it motivates them and encourages them to remain in the organization and thereby leads to higher marketing effectiveness and also possible external customer satisfaction and loyalty.</p><p>Satisfaction suggested a more reciprocal relationship with marketing effectiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref25">25</xref>] . The result of their findings corroborates with this study finding. This study finding suggests a very strong and positive relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Marketing Information. Also, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref16">16</xref>] concluded that the leader-member quality of exchange relates positively between Strategic Orientation and leader-rated job performance and satisfaction of their job. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref22">22</xref>] , found that Strategic Orientation strongly relate with employees’ job attitudes. This does not support the study finding. The study finding suggests a strong and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and adequate Strategic Orientation.</p></sec><sec id="s12_2"><title>12.2. Interfunctional Coordination and Marketing Effectiveness</title><p>The literature documents the positive relationship between Interfunctional Coordination and Marketing Effectiveness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref30">30</xref>] . This does not agree with the finding of this study. The finding of this study suggests no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref22">22</xref>] in their study suggested that interfunctional coordination is related significantly and positively with effectiveness of marketing information systems. This does not corroborates with this study finding which suggested a strong and negative relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Adequate Marketing Information. The study finding indicates a strong and positive relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Adequate Strategic Orientation. This corroborates with the findings of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref20">20</xref>] . In their research, they found out that interfunctional coordination relates more with company’s marketing effectiveness. Furthermore, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.81007-ref1">1</xref>] , results show that correlation coefficient between the elements of interfunctional coordination and marketing effectiveness is equal.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s13"><title>13. Summary of Findings</title><p>The previous chapter presented data on Internal Marketing and Effectiveness, and the interaction between them (test of hypotheses) and discussion of findings. In this chapter the findings were summarized, conclusions drawn and recommendations made.</p><p>1) We observed that Employee Job Satisfaction relates very strongly and positively with Adequate Marketing Information.</p><p>2) Employee Job Satisfaction relates moderately and negatively with Customer Philosophy.</p><p>3) The finding of this study revealed a strong and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Strategic Orientation.</p><p>4) The finding of this study suggests no significant relationship between Inter- functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy.</p><p>5) We observed that Inter-functional Coordination has a strong and negative relationship with Adequate Marketing Information.</p><p>6) The finding of this study revealed a strong and positive relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Adequate Strategic Orientation.</p></sec><sec id="s14"><title>14. Conclusions</title><p>This study examined the relationship between Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State. Based on the findings of this study, the following conclusions were drawn:</p><p>1) There is a strong and positive relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Marketing Information.</p><p>2) There is a moderate and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction as a dimension of Internal Marketing and Customer Philosophy.</p><p>3) Employee Job Satisfaction has a strong and negative relationship with Adequate Strategic Orientation.</p><p>4) There is a strong and negative relationship between Inter-functional Coordination as a dimension of Internal Marketing and Adequate Marketing Information as a measure of Marketing Effectiveness.</p><p>5) There is no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy.</p><p>6) Inter-functional Coordination has a strong and positive relationship with Adequate Strategic Orientation.</p></sec><sec id="s15"><title>15. Recommendations</title><p>Recommendations were made based on the findings and conclusions of this study:</p><p>1) In view of the fact that there exist a strong and positive relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction as a dimension of Internal Marketing and Adequate Marketing Information as a measure of Marketing Effectiveness, and also a moderate and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Customer Philosophy, and further a strong and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction as a dimension of Internal Marketing and Adequate Strategic Orientation, Hotel Industry in Rivers State should see that their physical facilities, equipment and communication materials are improved. Make available carrier opportunities for development and employees satisfaction should be evaluated regularly with their job the condition to identify if they take pleasure in and sees their job as satisfying.</p><p>2) Since Inter-functional Coordination has a strong and negative relationship with Adequate Marketing Information as a measure of Marketing Effectiveness, also there exist no significant relationship between Inter-functional Coordination and Customer Philosophy and further Inter-functional Coordination has a strong and positive relationship with Adequate Strategic Orientation, Hotel Industry in Rivers State should be concerned in personnel and other resources coordination all through the organisation to create superior customer value. They should see to it that marketing information of the hotel is made known to other departments and all departments are concerned in business plans/strategies preparation.</p></sec><sec id="s16"><title>16. Contribution to Knowledge</title><p>There have been several studies on Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness but none that I know of have written on Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State. The present study fills this void by analyzing Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State.</p><p>The researcher proposes a model of the relationship between Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State based on the findings from the study, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. This model proposes that there is Strong, Moderate, Weak, Negative and no relationship between Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness.</p></sec><sec id="s17"><title>17. Heuristic Model</title><p>The diagram below depicts the Heuristic model of the relationships that exist</p><p>amongst the variables.</p><p>The Employee Job Satisfaction has a very strong and positive relationship with Adequate Marketing Information measure of Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State. The black arrow indicates very strong relationship. Also, the Employee Job Satisfaction has a moderate and negative relationship with Customer Philosophy as depicted by the pink marrow. Further, there exist a strong and negative relationship between Employee Job Satisfaction and Adequate Strategic Orientation as shown by the blue broken arrow. Inter-functional Coordination has no significant relationship with Customer Philosophy as shown by the curved arrow. Also, Inter-functional Coordination has a strong and negative relationship with Adequate Marketing Information as indicated by the blue broken arrow. Finally, a strong and positive relationship exists between Inter-functional Coordination and Adequate Strategic Orientation as depicted by the blue arrow.</p></sec><sec id="s18"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Nwokah, N.G. and Briggs, J.T. (2017) Internal Marketing and Marketing Effectiveness of Hotel Industry in Rivers State. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 5, 238-257. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2017.54021</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.81007-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rafiq, M. and Ahmed, P.K. (1993) The Scope of Internal Marketing: Defining the Boundary Marketing and Human Resource Management. Journal of Marketing Management, 9, 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1993.9964234</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boris, B., Donald, R.C. and Schinder, P.S. (2005) Business Research Methods. McGraw-Hill Education.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwokah, N.G. and Ahiauzu, A.I. (2008) Managerial Competency and Marketing Effectiveness in Corporate Organizations in Nigeria. Journal of Management Development, 27, 858-878. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710810895677</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Norburn, D., Birley, S. and Dunn, M.G. (1988) Strategic Marketing Effectiveness and Its Relationship to Corporate Culture and Beliefs: A Cross-National Study. International Studies of Management and Organization, 18, 83-100.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1988.11656481</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nwokah</surname><given-names> N.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Marketing Effectiveness and Business Performance</article-title><source> Nigerian Journal of Business and Society</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 15</fpage>-<lpage>26</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rafiq, M. and Ahmed, P.K. (2000) Advances in the Internal Marketing Concept: Definition, Synthesis and Extension. Journal of Services Marketing, 6, 449-462.&lt;br /&gt;  
https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010347589</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Slater, S. and Narver, J. (1994) Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation Performance Relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58, 46-55.  
https://doi.org/10.2307/1252250</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sultan</surname><given-names> M.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>The Role of Marketing Information System in Marketing Decision-Making in Jordanian Share-Holding Medicines Production Companies</article-title><source> IJRRAS</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 326</fpage>-<lpage>336</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tansuhaj, P., Wong, J. and McCullough, J. (1987) Internal and External Marketing: Effects on Consumer Satisfaction in Banks in Thailand. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 5, 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb010812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saeedinejad, M.M. (2016) The Study of the Effective of Internal Marketing on Sales Staff Performance with an Emphasis on the Role of Organizational Commitment. Asian Social Sciences, 12, 169-178. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v12n6p169</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanzo, M.J., Santos, M.L., Vázquez, R. and álvarez, L.I. (2003) The Effect of Market Orientation on Buyer-Seller Relationship Satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 327-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00200-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tay, J.Y. and Tay, L. (2007) Market Orientation and the Property Development Business in Singapore. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, 1-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tiny</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Implementation of Internal Marketing on a Sample of Egyptian Five-Star Hotels</article-title><source> Anatolia—An International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research</source><volume> 22</volume>,<fpage> 153</fpage>-<lpage>167</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trochim, W. (2006) The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Atomic Dog Pub., Cincinnati.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Webster, C. (1995) Marketing Culture and Marketing Effectiveness in Service Firms. Journal of Services Marketing, 9, 6-21.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049510085973</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yukselen, C. (1997) Factors Associated with Marketing Effectiveness of Small and Medium Sized Firms in Turkey. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 7, 99-105. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047351</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. and Berry, L.L. (1990) Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. The Free Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, K.Z., Gao, G.Y., Yang, Z. and Zhou, N. (2005) Developing Strategic Orientation in China: Antecedents and Consequences of Market and Innovation Orientations. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1049-1058.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.02.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zikmund, W.G. (2004) Business Research Methods. Forth Work, Dryden Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riketta, M. (2012) The Causal Relation between Job Attitudes and Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Panel Studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 472-481.&lt;br /&gt;  
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pettijohn, C.E., Pettijohn, L.S. and Taylor, A.J. (2007) Does Salesperson Perception of the Importance of Sales Skills Improve Sales Performance, Customer Orientation, Job Satisfaction? Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 27, 75-88. &lt;br /&gt; 
https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134270105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Papasolomou, D.I. (2002) The Role of Employee Development in Customer Relations: The Case of UK Retail Banks. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7, 62-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280210416053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okwandu, G.A. (2004) Research Methods in Business and Social Sciences. Civincs Pub., Owerri.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Oosthuizen</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Marketing Effectiveness and Its Relationship to Organizational Culture Characteristics and Output Performance: The South African Experience</article-title><source> Journal of Studies in Economics and Econometrics</source><volume> 16</volume>,<fpage> 59</fpage>-<lpage>78</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panigyrakis, G. and Chatzipanagiotou, K. (2004) The Relationship between Market Orientation and Marketing Information Systems Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Business Information Systems, 8, 69-82.  
https://doi.org/10.19030/rbis.v8i4.4478</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kotler, P. (1977) From Sales Obsession to Marketing Effectiveness. Harvard Business Review, 67-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Christopher, M., Payne, A.F.T. and Ballantyne, D. (1991) Relationship Marketing: Bringing Quality, Customer Service and Marketing Together. Butterworth Heinemann/CIM, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Berry</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1981</year>)<article-title>The Employee as a Customer</article-title><source> Journal of Retail Banking</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 33</fpage>-<lpage>44</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chatzipanagiotou, K., Vassilikopoulou, A. and Siomkos, G. (2008) An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between Market Orientation and Marketing Effectiveness in Upscale Hotels in Greece. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 16, 285-297. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2008.20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A. (1991) Marketing Services: Competing through Quality. The Free Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benjamin, S., Hanges, P.J., Smith, D.B. and Salvaggio, A.N. (2003) Which Comes First: Employee Attitudes or Organizational Financial and Market Performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 836-851.  
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.836</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avwokemi, A.J. (2005) Practical Project Writing and Oral Presentation. Unicampus Pub., Port Harcourt, 101-192.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Armstrong, M. (2006) A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page Publishing, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Appiah-Adu, K., Fyall, A. and Singh, S. (2001) Marketing Effectiveness and Business Performance in the Financial Services Industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 15, 18-32. &lt;br /&gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040110381346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmed, P.K. and Rafiq, M. (2003) Internal Marketing Issues and Challenges. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 1177-1186.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310498813</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.81007-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahiauzu, A. (2006) Advance Research Methods in the Management Sciences Port Harcourt. Lecture Notes PhD Class Rivers State University of Science and Technology.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>