<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8792</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojog.2017.713126</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOG-80938</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Indications and Prognosis of the Hysterectomy Operation in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at the University Teaching Hospital of Ouagadougou (UTH-YO), Burkina Faso
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouattara</surname><given-names>Adama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kaboré</surname><given-names>Francois Xavier Gueswendé</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sib</surname><given-names>Sansan Rodrigue</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Millogo/Traoré</surname><given-names>Françoise Danielle</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouedraogo</surname><given-names>Issa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Touré</surname><given-names>Boubakar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouédraogo</surname><given-names>Ali</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ouédraogo</surname><given-names>Marie Charlemagne</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Thieba/Bonane</surname><given-names>Blandine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Gynecologist Obstetrician at the University Teaching Hospital of Ouagadougou, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Gynecologist Obstetrician at the Regional Hospital of Ouahigouya, Ouahigouya, Burkina Faso</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ouattzangaadama@yahoo.fr(OA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>13</issue><fpage>1239</fpage><lpage>1246</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8,</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective
  : To describe the indications and the prognosis of the hysterectomy operation in the obstetrics and gynecology department at the UTH-YO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. <b>Methodology</b>: It has been a descriptive cross-sectional study over a period of 18 months from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2015 in the obstetrics and gynecology department of the UTH-YO. The variables studied were demographics, clinical and prognostic aspects. <b>Results</b>: During the study period, we recorded 128 cases of hysterectomies including 20 obstetric causes (15.62%) and 108 gynecological cases (84.38%). The incidence of hysterectomy was 3 per 1000 births. Gynecological indications were dominated by uterine fibroids (47.3%), genital prolapse (20.4%), cervical dysplasia (9.3%) and functional bleeding (7.4%). Obstetric indications were dominated by uterine ruptures (60%), the postpartum haemorrhage (15%). The prognosis of obstetric indications was marked by 5 cases of bladder lesions or a morbidity rate of 3.9% and 4 deaths that to say a fatality rate of 3.1%. <b>Conclusion</b>: The prognosis of hysterectomies should be improved with further training of health workers in surgical techniques, the adoption of strategies to reduce maternal mortality and community awareness in attendance at health facilities.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hysterectomy</kwd><kwd> Indications</kwd><kwd> Prognosis</kwd><kwd> Ouagadougou</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Hysterectomy, which involves removal of the uterus, is a common procedure in surgical practice. In France, it is the most common interventions after appendectomy. Performed vaginally or abdominally, the indications are gynecological or obstetrical order. Obstetric hysterectomy is often performed in emergency in order to save the life of the mother. In gynecology, indications are dominated by the tumor, whether benign or malignant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In Burkina Faso, a country in sub-Saharan Africa, the hysterectomy indications were represented by uterine ruptures and benign fibroids tumors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref7">7</xref>] . Since 2010, the promotion of screening for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix by the method of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Iodine (VIA-VIL) has expanded the indications for hysterectomy.</p><p>In the absence of data on hysterectomies in the gynecology department of the University Teaching Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo (UTH-YO) at Ouagadougou, we felt it necessary to initiate this study to define the indications of hysterectomies and assess prognosis.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methodology</title><p>It has been a transversal descriptive study conducted into the Obstetrics and Gynecology department of the University Teaching Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo (UTH-YO) at Ouagadougou, from 1<sup>st</sup> January 2014 to 30 June 2015 or a period of 18 months. Ouagadougou is the capital of Burkina Faso, located in West Africa. Were included in the study, patients who underwent a hysterectomy in the department during the period of the study. The variables studied were demographics, clinical and prognostic aspects.</p><p>Data were collected on a survey sheet which has tracked patients from admission until discharge from the hospital. Entry and data analysis were performed on micro PC with 6 GB of Epi Info software. Statistical tests used for data comparison were the usual statistics (mean, proportion, percentage), comparison tests of qualitative variables (chi square test, Fischer test). The significance level was set at p &lt; 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Frequency</title><p>From 1<sup>st</sup> January 2014 to 30 June 2015, we identified 128 cases of hysterectomy. During this period, 9474 patients were admitted and 3332 surgeries were recorded in the department of gynecology and obstetrics at the UTH-YO. Hysterectomy represented 1.3% of admissions and 3.8% of surgeries. The division found 20 hysterectomies for obstetric causes and 108 hysterectomies for gynecological causes in the respective reports of 15.6% and 84.4%. The number of hysterectomies in obstetrical causes reported for 6459 deliveries recorded during the period of the study that to say a frequency of 3 hysterectomies for 1000 deliveries.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Socio-Demographic Characteristics</title><p>Sociodemographic characteristics are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Clinical Aspects</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Admission Reasons</title><p>The various reasons for admission are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Indications and Surgical Approach</title><p>Taking into account the surgical approach initially used, the operating data are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Type of Hysterectomy</title><p>In 109 cases (85.2%), a total hysterectomy was performed and in 19 cases or 14.8%, it was subtotal. In gynecological indications, hysterectomy was intra-facial and performed abdominally.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Timing of Surgery</title><p>The mean duration of surgery was 100 minutes with extremes of 45 minutes and 210 minutes. It has been represented in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Associated Procedures</title><p>In the abdominally hysterectomy, 31 patients (24.22%) received a gesture</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sociodemographic characteristics of patients (n = 128)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Settings</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Values</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Middle age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.23 (16-72)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Profession</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Household</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104 (81.3%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (18.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.8%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widows</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Singles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean number of pregnancy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.88 (0 - 12)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of childbirth</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (7.8%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 - 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (16.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 - 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (48.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (27.4%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Geographical origin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ouagadougou</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98 (76.6%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (23.4%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the reason for admission (n = 128)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >reason</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Proportion (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynecological Indications (n = 108)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine fibroids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cervical dysplasia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine cervical cancer stage I</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Choriocarcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endometrial cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovarian cyst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine malformation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovarian tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetric Indications (n = 20)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine rupture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placenta praevia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pre rupture uterine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >acromion presentation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >post ceasarean evisceration</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydatiform mole</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of patients according to the surgical indication and the surgery approach (n = 128)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Indication for surgery</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Surgical approach</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >%</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >vaginally</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >abdominally</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cancer of the cervix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Endometrial Cancer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Choriocarcinoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cervical dysplasia (CIN3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine fibroma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placental abryptio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Functional bleeding</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Postpartum hemorrhage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine malformation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine necrosis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine perforation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyp delivered by the cervix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Polyp in the cavity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0,78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genital prolapse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Uterine rupture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ovarian tumor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>associated. The complementary gesture most used was oophorectomy in 25 cases. During vaginally hysterectomy, 19 patients or 14.84% received a gesture associated of perineorrhaphy type. The observed difference was statistically significant (χ<sup>2</sup> = 17.94 p corrected = 2.10 - 5).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Prognosis</title><sec id="s3_4_1"><title>3.4.1. Complications</title><p>Five (5) cases of bladder lesions or 3.9% of hysterectomy cases including two cases by high way and three, vaginally. Two cases of urogenital fistulas were recorded for a frequency of 1.6%</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_2"><title>3.4.2. Duration of Hospital Stay</title><p>The average hospital stay was 7 days with extremes of 1 and 27 days. The hospital stay was less than eight days in 89 cases (69.5%). The duration of hospitalization was lower to eight days for 60% of patients operated vaginally versus 68.2% of operated abdominally. This difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.07).</p><p>The study of hospital stay according to the indications clearly shows that the length of stay was longer with obstetric indications (p = 0.003).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4_3"><title>3.4.3. Mode of Leaving from Hospital</title><p>One hundred twenty-two (122) patients were left without any complication or 95.3% in the number of patients operated for hysterectomy. No patient left against medical advice. Four (4) deaths were deplored following obstetric complications case or a fatality rate of 3.1%. Two (02) patients were transferred to the urology department.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The frequency of hysterectomy in our study was 3.8%. Thus it is substantially equal to the one of Balima [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref8">8</xref>] in a study conducted from 1996 to 2000, which represented 3.11% hysterectomy surgery of the obstetrics gynecology department at the UTH-YO. Despite the extension of the methods of early detection of precancerous lesions, this frequency seems to remain the same. It should be good to monitor the frequency of hysterectomies to evaluate the impact of the promotion of the management of precancerous lesions in our country.</p><p>Our study found a mean age of 43.23 years, ranging from sixteen to seventy- two years in patients operated for hysterectomy; while Kouakou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref7">7</xref>] in Cote d’Ivoire found extreme for the vaginally 37 and 61 years with a mean age of patients at 51 years. On 1127 hysterectomies performed in the gynecology department in the hospitals of Grace in Toulouse in France [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] , across all lanes, the average age of abdominally hysterectomies was 47.5 years. We notice that in our study, the population was younger. This reflects the lowest life expectation in Burkina Faso; 53 years in urban areas and 48 in rural areas according to national studies.</p><p>We recorded twenty four (24) cases of vaginally hysterectomy (18.75%) and a hundred and four cases by abdominally way (81.25%). P&#233;rineau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] on 1127 hysterectomies have used vaginally in 31.05% of cases. This rate is significantly higher than ours, and is explained by the fact that vaginally hysterectomies are recent practice in our department.</p><p>For the vaginally way, the indication was genital prolapse in 83.33% of cases operated. For the abdominally way, the most frequent indications are uterine fibroids in 52 cases (50%), uterine rupture in 13 cases (12.5%), 10 cases of cervical cancer (9.61%), cervical dysplasia in 8 cases (7.69%), 5 cases of choriocarcinoma (4.81%) and 5 cases (4.81%) of postpartum hemorrhage. According to P&#233;rineau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] , the most frequent indications for the abdominally hysterectomy are the uterine fibroids in 66, 7%. Our results are comparable to those of P&#233;rineau’s in this pattern. The low rate of vaginally hysterectomy for uterine fibroid in our department can be explained by the frequency of large uterine fibroids whose size makes it better for abdominal surgery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>The average duration of surgery in our study was 100 minutes. In 67.19% of cases the duration of intervention was between 60 to 119 minutes. The average operative time was 102 minutes for the abdominally way and 90 minutes for vaginally surgery. According to Lansac [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref2">2</xref>] , the duration of the vaginally hysterectomy is thirty-five to fourty-five minutes when an adnexectomy which extends the time of at least fifteen minutes is not realized. Our performance is well below those of literature and reflects our status of beginners in this field.</p><p>We recorded during our study five cases of bladder lesions (3.9%) including two cases (1.56%) by abdominally way and three (2.34%) by vaginally way. P&#233;rineau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] recorded on 1127 hysterectomies 1.2% of bladder injury abdominal and 1.7% vaginally. El Ghaoui [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref9">9</xref>] found on 962 hysterectomies 2.3% of bladder injury by abdominally and 1.5% by vaginally. Our experience shows an acceptable rate of bladder injury. This unusually high rate of 12.5% is explained by our status of beginner with vaginally hysterectomy.</p><p>The average hospital stay was 7 days with extremes of 1 to 27. The study of hospital stay according to the indications clearly shows that the stay was significantly prolonged with obstetric indications (p = 0.003) and the presence of anemia at the admission (p &lt; 0.05). Our average stay is comparable to the data of the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>One hundred twenty-two patients were left without complication (95.3%). For these patients the postoperative course was uneventful. Four cases (3.12%) of death in all were recorded due to obstetric complications. It has concerned women in labor evacuated for uterine rupture (2 cases) and postpartum hemorrhage (2 cases). P&#233;rineau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] recorded 0.9% death after total hysterectomy. About hysterectomies obstetric causes, Dongmo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref12">12</xref>] found a mortality of 35% in Yaound&#233; and Mayi-Tsonga [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref15">15</xref>] recorded a mortality of 24% in Libreville. Our fatality rate, higher than P&#233;rineau [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80938-ref3">3</xref>] can be explained by the fact that the deaths have been in cases of obstetric emergencies evacuated from peripheral structures in poor conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Hysterectomy remains a major intervention in gynecology and obstetrics. It is marked by complications because very often practiced in a context of emergency with patients in poor general health condition. Improving the accessibility and affordability of health structures, the fight against poverty and monitoring delivery of labor by partogram could contribute to a sharp reduction in obstetric indications for hysterectomy. In contrast, the development of precancerous and cancerous lesions screening policies of the cervix should result in increased gynecological causes of hysterectomies.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Adama, O., Gueswend&#233;, K.F.X., Rodrigue, S.S., Danielle, M.F., Issa, O., Boubakar, T., Ali, O., Charlemagne, O.M. and Blandine, T. (2017) Indications and Prognosis of the Hysterectomy Operation in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at the University Teaching Hospital of Ouagadougou (UTH-YO), Burkina Faso. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 1239-1246. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojog.2017.713126</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.80938-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cosson, M., Switala, I., Delest, A., Querleu, D. and Crepin, G. (1994) The Incision Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Lesions without Prolapse. Study of a Continuous Series of 806 Cases. Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique, 94, 17-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lansac, J., Body, G. and Magnin, G. (2002) Surgical Practice in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Masson, Paris, 360.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perineau, C., Monrozies, X. and Reme, J.M. (2002) Complications Hysterectomies. Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique, 87, 120-125.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Razafindrabe, J.A., Rabarijaona, M., Rakotoarisoa, B., Randriamaro, B., Sambany, R. and Razafindramboa, H. (2002) Reasons for Hysterectomy in Gynecology and Obstetrics. Médecine d'Afrique Noire, 49, 166-168.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dao, B., Toure, B., Sano, D., Bambara, M., Koalga, A., Da, E. and Bazie, A.J. (2001) Hysterectomies in Tropical Areas: Experience of an African Maternity. About 141 cases in Burkina Faso. Tunisia Medical, 79, 47-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lankoande, J., Sakande, B., Ouédraogo, A., Ouédraogo, C., Ouattara, T., Bonane, B. and Kone, B. (2002) Cervical Cancer in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the National Hospital Yalgado Ouédraogo of Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso): Epidemiological, Clinical and Pathological Aspects. Black African Medicine, 45, 442-445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouakou, F., Anongba, S., Adjobi, R., N'Guessan, E., Tegnan, A., Guie, P., Kouyate, S., Osondu, J.N. and Coulibaly, K. (2002) Vaginal Hysterectomy Saharan Africa, a Necessary Development: About 15 Case. Journal of the SAGO, 3, 22-27.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balima, E. (2002) Surgical Activities in Obstetrics Gynecology service of CHN-YO Ouagadougou. Stock of Five Years from January 1996 to December 2000. Thesis Med. UFR/SDS, Ouagadougou, No. 28, 67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghaoui El, A., Parant, O., Monrozies, X., Reme, J.M., Tanguy, Y. and Perineau, C. (2009) Vaginal Hysterectomy for Fibroid about 453 Cases. Retrospective Comparison to 509 Abdominal Hysterectomies. Annales De Chirurgie, 53, 201-205.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bashir, R., Parveen Sultana, R. and Khan, B. (2005) Two Years Audit of Complications of Hysterectomy at Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 17, 47-49.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dancoisne, P., Abossolo, T., Orvain, E., Tuaillon, J., Somer, J.C., Riviere, J.P. and Amat, D. (1994) Selection Criteria for Vaginal Hysterectomies during for Injuries Other Than Invasive Cancer. Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique, 89, 11-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dongmo, R., Doh, A.S., Ngossa, M. and Temgoua, P. (2015) Obstetric Emergency Hysterectomy: About 31 Cases at the Hospital of Yaounde Cameroon. Congo Médical, 3, 46-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kouam, L., Kamdom-Moyo, J. and Ngassa, P. (1996) Indications and Complications of Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Beginner Experience on 24 Cases at the Hospital of Yaounde (Cameroon). Revue francaise de gynecologie et d'obstetrique, 91, 228-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Subtle, D., Guttila, J.C. and Wattrisse, G. (1993) The Duration of Postoperative Hospitalization Gynecology. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 22, 18-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80938-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mayi-Tsonga, S., Pither, S., Meye, J.F., Ogowet, N., Ndombi, I., Nkiu, M. and Faye, A. (2002) Emergency Obstetric Hysterectomy: About 58 Cases at Libreville Hospital Centre. Medical Guinea No 38 October-November-December 2002, 8-12.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>