<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Air Pollution</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-2653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojap.2017.64011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAP-80544</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Influence of Gaseous Pollutants on Silver Artifacts Tarnishing
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yussri</surname><given-names>Salem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Conservation Department, Faculty of Archaeology, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yousry.ali@arch.svu.edu.eg</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>148</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>24,</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The present work investigated the effect of the common gaseous pollutants on silver artifacts corrosion. The study will be carried out on manufactured coupons of silver alloy (91 silver, 9 copper) which have chemical composition similar to ancient Egyptian silver artifacts. These coupons will be exposed to gaseous pollutants of each individual gas; such as Sulfur dioxide, Nitrogen dioxide, Carbon dioxide, Hydrogen sulfide and Chlorine. The exposure period will be four weeks in a climate chamber with gas concentration 10 PPM. After the test Examinations by SEM and PM were used to evaluate the effect of each gas and description the morphology of the corrosion layers. The results revealed that all gases reacted with the surface except carbon dioxide. The formed tarnishing layers varied in coverage and density rate. Corrosion products are analyzed by XRD and the results revealed Ag
  <sub>2</sub>S, AgCl, Ag
  <sub>2</sub>SO
  <sub>4</sub> and Ag
  <sub>2</sub>O as corrosion products.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Silver</kwd><kwd> Artifacts</kwd><kwd> Atmospheric Corrosion</kwd><kwd> Gaseous Pollutants</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Archaeological silver and its alloys have relatively high resistance to corrosion products in the atmospheric environment compared to copper and iron objects. But in the presence of humidity and gaseous pollutants―special Sulphur containing pollutants―Silver is susceptible to the tarnishing and corrosion products will be formed. Many corrosion products such as Ag<sub>2</sub>S, Ag<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, AgCl, have been identified on silver objects either in museum environment (displayed in cabinets and stored in depositories) or excavated from the burial environment. Silver objects corrosion in the atmospheric environmental attributed to the water layers on the surface which provide the reaction of the gaseous pollutants such as chloride anions, sulphates, carbonates and Sulphides with metallic surface and lead to the metal dissolution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Among the family of ancient metals, the fewest studies on the laboratory and field exposure of the gaseous pollutants were presented to silver. Previous lab exposure tests often focused on silver tarnish due to Sulphur containing pollutants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref7">7</xref>] . These studies have been agreed in their results which can be summarized in the formation of silver tarnish as black layer consisting of Ag<sub>2</sub>S as major corrosion product and Ag<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> in a negligible quantity. Few lab exposure studies have been presented to impact other gaseous pollutants such as Cl, NO<sub>2</sub>, and CO<sub>2</sub>, but the results were different and varied. The differences were as follow.</p><p>Results of Previous studies indicated that nitrogen dioxide is not considered a corrosion factor of silver because silver does not react with it, but it only acts as an accelerated factor of silver tarnish with other gases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref12">12</xref>] even though Previous study found silver nitrate Ag<sub>2</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> as corrosion products on exposed silver to 1.2 ppm NO<sub>2</sub> for 40 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Also Ag<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> as corrosion product was observed on silver coupons in field exposure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref13">13</xref>] although the studies indicated that Silver sulfate (Ag<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) forms only in artificially high levels of sulfur dioxide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Silver is sensitive to chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>) and silver chloride will be formed as a result of the reaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref17">17</xref>] . Also this does not agree with results revealed that silver chloride compound was not identified on surface film of silver coupons after the exposure in an ASTM B117 salt spray chamber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref18">18</xref>] and this compatibility with previous studies mentioned that silver does not react directly with chlorine gas and the presence of silver chloride as corrosion product due to burial in a chloride rich environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The laboratory-exposure studies of the effect of CO<sub>2</sub> gas on silver are very few, although Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> is distinguished as corrosion product of silver as result of the reaction with CO<sub>2</sub> and although CO<sub>2</sub> is abundant in the ambient environment of silver artifacts. So very little is known about the formation mechanism of Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> Such as it is expected only in strong alkaline solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref21">21</xref>] . Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> product corrosion has not been detected as corrosion product on the silver artifacts. Also Ag<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> was identified in a recent study of field-exposure study on the silver coupons exposed to various outdoor environments and the product was detected only in one site which distinguished above the temperature inversion layer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Therefore, in this study, the effects of gases (NO<sub>2</sub>, Cl, CO<sub>2</sub>) on silver will be presented as a laboratory exposure and the results will be compared with previous studies. Also they did not take sufficient laboratory studies although they were common gaseous pollutants in outdoor and indoor atmospheric environment, also hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide were chosen as main gases in silver tarnish and lead to silver sulfide which was often observed as corrosion product of silver.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Procedures</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Coupons Preparation</title><p>Silver coupons should be similar for archaeological silver of ancient Egypt civilization, different concentrations were found in Ancient Egyptian Silver, elemental analysis of a number of Egyptian silver artefacts showed that the concentration of silver in 10 objects between 83 to 90%, and between 90 to 95% of 19 other objects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref23">23</xref>] . Also analyses of Babylonian coins from silver copper alloy were about 87% - 90% purity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref21">21</xref>] . So that a composition of coupons was Ag 89.4% and Cu 10.5% .This concentration was not artificial available and was manufactured by alloying a mixture of silver (pieces from the pure silver) with pure copper pieces. The coupons were made by direct addition of silver and copper in a crucible <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref24">24</xref>] . The dimensions were (3 cm &#215; 5 cm &#215; 0.08 cm) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. XRF analysis used to determine the Composition.</p><p>Thin thickness of coupons about 8 m will be suitable and similar to silver artifacts thickness. most the silver artefacts were manufactured to thin sheets such as thin sheets for royal garments, hollow statues, jewellery items, funeral items, Household items of everyday life such as, spoons, jugs, cups, vessels, pots, covered wooden object, bowls and Other usages. Successive processes of hammering and ductility with the annealing on alloy rod to obtain thin thickness about 0.8 mm. Five new coupons were used for each gas test; a hole was drilled in each sample for suspension in the chamber middle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref21">21</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Design and Preparation of Climate Chamber Test</title><p>Climate chamber was designed according to ASTM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref25">25</xref>] . It is made of 1000 cm</p><p>diameter Perspex cylinder. The humidity was controlled gradually by the cup of saturated salt solution inside the chamber, the approximately 85% RH was obtained by a saturated solution of potassium chloride [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref26">26</xref>] and the chamber was only opened to remove coupons. Heating of the air inside the chamber is done by a cartridge heater, the air inside the chamber is continuously mixed by a fan, which was suspended from the ceiling of the chamber, the temperature and relative humidity inside the chamber are continuously measured by a data logger device [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref28">28</xref>] . A few studies were presented on the silver deterioration tests inside climate chamber, these studies used two types of the deterioration factors: high relative humidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref29">29</xref>] and gaseous pollutants in presence relative humidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref29">29</xref>] . Most studies of silver deterioration were used corrosive solutions as deterioration factors, such as BaS 5 g/l solution for 24 Hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref18">18</xref>] and Na<sub>2</sub>S were used as the tarnishing solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref31">31</xref>] . Acetic acid solutions were used as simulation of emissions vapors in wooden cabinets and CuCl<sub>2</sub> 50 g/l for 20 min, and NaCl [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref29">29</xref>] were used of AgCl silver patina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. The Test Gases</title><p>The gases for the test were as follows: Sulfur dioxide SO<sub>2</sub>, Nitrogen dioxide NO<sub>2</sub>, Carbon dioxide CO<sub>2</sub>, Chlorine gas Cl and Hydrogen Sulphide H<sub>2</sub>S. The gas is mixed with the present air in inside chamber. Those types were the most influence in deterioration of silver artefacts.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Test Procedures</title><p>Each five coupons were exposed to humidified air containing concentration 10 ppm of one gas only. Accelerated conditions parameters were as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The values of conditions parameters were chosen after survey of 29 previous studies which included lab exposure of ancient metals family (copper, bronze, silver, steel and lead) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Their most experiments were performed at room temperature (22˚C - 25˚C), and relative humidity between 80 - 90. The other two factors such as the gases concentration and the exposure period differed from study to another.</p><p>Cylinders 99.9% concentration were used to obtain of CO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> gases, The gas flowed from cylinder into the exposure chamber after the calculation of flow and time of the required concentration. H<sub>2</sub>S and Cl<sup>−</sup> were prepared in lab, H<sub>2</sub>S prepared by the reaction of hydrochloric acid diluted with ferrous sulfide (Equation (1)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref51">51</xref>] and Cl<sup>−</sup> prepared by the interaction of concentrated Cl<sup>−</sup> with manganese dioxide (Equation (2)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref52">52</xref>] . According to the law of Avogadro and Lussac can be calculated Volume which the required concentration of H<sub>2</sub>S and Cl<sup>−</sup> inside the chamber is occupied. Where Molecular weight (one mole) of any gas under standard conditions is occupied 22,400 ml (The molar volume, Equation (3)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref53">53</xref>] , and by the calculated of molecular weight to H<sub>2</sub>S Equation (4) which occupied 22,400 ml can be calculated volume of the required concentration of H<sub>2</sub>S Equation (5).</p><p>FeS + 2HCl → FeCl 2 + H 2 S (1)</p><p>4HCl + MnO 2 → MnCl 2 + 2H 2 O + Cl 2 (2)</p><p>1moleofagasatSTP = 22 . 4litersofagas (3)</p><p>2X1 + 32 = 34   g = 224 00   ml (4)</p><p>10 ppm ( 19 mg / m 3 ) = X (5)</p><p>Gas syringe was used to get the required volume and injected it into inside chamber <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, the fan was used for mixing gases and its distribution inside the chamber.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Conditions and procedures of the test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Period</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 ppm</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Summarizes lap exposure conditions to gaseous pollutants with ancient metals in the previous studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ref.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gas</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Coupons</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref32">32</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OCS, H<sub>2</sub>S, SO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 - 0.26 ppm 2.66 - 3.64 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silver</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 hours</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 - 22 ppm, 1.8 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80% - 90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tin</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref34">34</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 - 77 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 ppb, 2 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30, 80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref35">35</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub>+NO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75 SO<sub>2</sub> + 120 ppb NO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref36">36</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetic and formic acid vapors</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >One, two and four weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >formic acid 160 ppb, acetic acid 170 ppb, CO<sub>2</sub> 350 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lead</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref37">37</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>S, NO<sub>2</sub>, Cl<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4, 10 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10, 200, 10 ppb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref38">38</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixture of NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 ppb SO<sub>2</sub>, 200 ppb O<sub>3</sub>. NO<sub>2</sub> ppb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref39">39</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vapor HNO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325 μg/m<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref40">40</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixture of SO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub> 75, H<sub>2</sub>S 50 (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref41">41</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixture of SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10, 30, 60 hour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub> 75, NO<sub>2</sub> 120 (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref42">42</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Formaldehyde, acetic and formic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04, 0.4, 4 ppmv</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54%, 75%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper, lead</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref43">43</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >formic and acetic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100, 200, 300 ppm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref44">44</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HNO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >126 (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper,</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref45">45</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub> + SO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 weeks</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800, 800 + 800 (&#181;g/m<sup>−3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref46">46</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(10 ppm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref47">47</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub> + O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >476 ppb + 500 (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref48">48</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>2</sub> + SO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 + 3000 (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Steel</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref49">49</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 200 (ppb)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref50">50</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SO<sub>2</sub> + NO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14, 21, 28 days</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 and 800 (&#181;g∙m<sup>−3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70, 90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Copper</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref29">29</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500 ppb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50%, 90%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silver</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Examination of the Samples after the Test</title><p>All the coupons surfaces interacted with the gases from the first week except the exposed coupons to carbon dioxide. The reaction behavior inside the chamber and the growth rate of the tarnishing layer were similar among Cl, H<sub>2</sub>S, and NO<sub>2</sub>. The interaction began as a very thin layer on the surface and the growth of tarnishing was generally rapid then became slow. The surface appearance turned from light interference tones to a grey and, finally, black film. Also the tarnishing rate was increased with H<sub>2</sub>S, Cl, decreased with SO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub> as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>The Coupons were examined after each test by Visual examination, Polarizing Microscope and Scanning Electron Microscope to identify the morphology of the formed layer and evaluate the interaction between the coupons surface and the test gases. The investigation results revealed that the formed tarnishing layer, thickness, density and coverage of the surface were differed among the test coupons as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. H<sub>2</sub>S coupons recorded the highest thickness, density and coverage of the formed layer. Also H<sub>2</sub>S caused pitting in the metallic core. Cl coupons were completely covered by a uniform general dense layer of silver tarnishing. CO<sub>2</sub> coupons revealed very weak effect of gas. Slightly tarnishing layer with green spots were observed on the surface of NO<sub>2</sub> coupons. SO<sub>2</sub> coupons showed the least tarnishing layer and the reaction was very slow although humidity existed, the slow reaction of SO<sub>2</sub> with silver was mention in previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref35">35</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. The Analysis of Corrosion Products by X-Ray Diffraction and Raman Spectroscopy</title><p>The coupons were exposed to X-ray diffraction to analyze the formed patina.</p><p>This was showed many of corrosion products as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The Raman spectrum of the tarnishing formed with H<sub>2</sub>S shows four intensive bands in the range of 80 - 274 cm<sup>−1</sup>, Apart from the bands related to silver lattice vibrations at 93 and 147 cm<sup>−1</sup>, the others can be assigned to Ag-S-Ag symmetric stretching mode in particular at 93, 188 and 243 cm<sup>−1</sup> with a shoulder at 273 cm<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref54">54</xref>] . The Raman spectrum confirmed XRD result because the bands revealed acanthite product <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(a).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Corrosion products on the coupons after the test</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >SO2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CO<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>S</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag Ag<sub>2</sub>O Ag<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AgCl Ag<sub>2</sub>O Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag AgO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag AgO Ag<sub>2</sub>O Ag<sub>2</sub>S Ag<sub>2</sub>CuS<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag Ag<sub>2</sub>O Ag(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(NO)<sub>3</sub> Cu<sub>2</sub>(NO<sub>3</sub>)(OH)<sub>3</sub></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The Raman spectrum of Cl gas coupon presented sharp and highly intensive band at 236 cm<sup>−1</sup>, two weak bands at 145 and 349 cm<sup>−1</sup>, these beaks agreement with the main beaks of AgCl bands as in reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref54">54</xref>] <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>(b), the layer tarnishing of other gases was so slight that it was not identified by Raman.</p><p>Silver sulfide (Ag<sub>2</sub>S Acanthite): they were identified as abundant on silver artifacts. The reaction behavior between gas H<sub>2</sub>S and the silver surface to form these products explains Equations (6) and (7).</p><p>4Ag + O 2 + 2H 2 S → 2Ag 2 S + 2H 2 O (6) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref55">55</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref56">56</xref>]</p><p>2Ag + H 2 S → Ag 2 S + H 2 (7) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref5">5</xref>]</p><p>Silver chloride (AgCl Cerargyrite, chlorargyrite): In this case, the dominant theory in the interpretation of formation mechanism of chloroargyrite AgCl is the transformation of Ag<sub>2</sub>O to AgCl as Equation (8) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref14">14</xref>]</p><p>Ag 2 O + 2Cl − + H 2 O → 2AgCl + 2OH − (8) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref13">13</xref>]</p><p>Silver sulfite (Ag<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>): This product was identified in a previous study as corrosion product of silver [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.80544-ref1">1</xref>] and the Equations (9)-(12) were suggested for the mechanism of its formation on silver coupons surface.</p><p>2Ag + + 2OH − → Ag 2 O + H 2 O (9)</p><p>OH − + SO 2 → HSO 3 − (10)</p><p>Ag 2 O + HSO 3 − → Ag 2 SO 3 + OH − (11)</p><p>Ag 2 SO 3 → Ag 2 SO 4 (12)</p><p>Silver oxide Ag<sub>2</sub>O: Silver artifacts react with oxygen either by the electrochemical reactions in the presence of humidity (Equations (13)-(15)) or by chemical reactions in the absence humidity (Equation (16)). Therefore Ag<sub>2</sub>O and AgO are formed</p><p>on silver artifacts surfaces.</p><p>Ag → Ag + + e − (13)</p><p>1 2 O 2 + H 2 O + e − → 2OH − (14)</p><p>2Ag + + 2OH − → Ag 2 O + H 2 O (15)</p><p>Ag + 1 2 O 2 → Ag 2 O (16)</p><p>Silver ammine nitrate (Ag(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(NO)<sub>3</sub>): previous studies of filed and lab. exposure were identified only one product (AgNO<sub>3</sub>) from nitrates anions as corrosion products on silver surface, Therefore this compound was expected of NO<sub>2</sub> gas, but analysis showed Silver ammine nitrate (Ag(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(NO)<sub>3</sub>).</p><p>Copper Nitrate Hydroxide (Rouaite, Cu<sub>2</sub>(NO<sub>3</sub>)(OH)<sub>3</sub>): Silver and copper are the coupons alloy elements, the formation of Rouaite corrosion product is contributed to selective corrosion of copper by the interaction of cu (as the main alloying element) with NO<sub>2</sub> gas.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Silver in the ambient atmosphere and presence humidity is susceptible to the reaction with air pollutants. The tarnishing is formed not only in the presence of Sulphur containing pollutants but also there are other gaseous such as Cl and NO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>Except the coupons of CO<sub>2</sub>, all the test coupons were exposed to tarnishing layer which was formed on the surface as a blackish thin film caused by the reaction of the metal surface with test pollutants. But highest layer in density and tarnishing was to H<sub>2</sub>S gas.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Found</title><p>This research was founded by south valley university (Egypt).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>I would like to thank Dr. Mai Rifai Con. Dep. Arch. Fac. Cai. Uni, for all assistance and support, Thanks also need to go to Dr. Adel Abdelkader Chem. Dep. Sci. Fac. Sou. Val. Uni. and prof. A.A. Shakour, Air Pollution Department, National Research Center, Egypt, for their helpful to adjust the gases concentration inside the chamber test.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Salem, Y. (2017) The Influence of Gaseous Pollutants on Silver Artifacts Tarnishing. Open Journal of Air Pollution, 6, 135-148. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojap.2017.64011</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.80544-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanders, C.E., Verreault, D., Frankel, G.S. and Allen, H.C. (2015) The Role of Sulfur in the Atmospheric Corrosion of Silver. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 162, 630-637. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0051512jes</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, H. (2003) Corrosion Process of Silver in Environments Containing 0.1 ppm H2S and 1.2 ppm NO2. Materials and Corrosion, 54, 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.200390053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kleber, C., Wiesinger, R., Schnller, J., Hilfrich, U., Hutter, H. and Schreiner, M. (2008) Initial Oxidation of Silver Surfaces by S2- and S4-Species. Corrosion Science, 50, 1112-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2007.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pope, D., Gibbens, H.R. and Moss, R.L. (1986) The Tarnishing of Silver at Naturally Occurring H2S and SO2 Levels. Corrosion Science, 8, 883-887.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(68)80141-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graedel, T.E., Franey, J.P., Gualtieri, G.J., Kammlott, G.W. and Malm, D.L. (1985) On the Mechanism of Silver and Copper Sulfidation by Atmospheric H2S and OCS. Corrosion Science, 25, 1163-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(85)90060-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Derdall, G. and Hyne, J.B. (1979) The Production of H2S by Hydrolysis of Entrained COS in Hydrocarbon Liquids. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 57, 112-114.https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450570119</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, H. and Frankel, G.S. (2013) Accelerated Atmospheric Corrosion Testing of Ag. Corros., 69, 1060-1072. https://doi.org/10.5006/0926</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guinement, J. and Fiaud, C. (1986) Laboratory Study of the Reaction of Silver and Copper with Some Atmospheric Pollutants. Proceedings of the 13th ICEC Conference, Pattaya, 28-29 December 2017, 383-390.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbott, W.H. (1987) The Development and Performance Characteristics of Mixed Flowing Gas Test Environments. IEEE Transactions on Components, Hybrids, and Manufacturing Technology, 11, 22-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graedel, T.E. (1992) Corrosion Mechanisms for Silver Exposed to the Atmosphere. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 139, 1963-1970. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2221162</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbott, W.H. (1974) Effects of Industrial Air Pollutants on Electrical Contact Materials. IEEE Transactions on Parts, Hybrids, and Packaging, 10, 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPHP.1974.1134830</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Myers, M. (2009) Overview of the Use of Silver in Connector Applications. Technical Paper, Interconnection &amp; Process Technology Tyco Electronics, Harrisburg, PA, 503-516.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wan, Y., Wang, X., Wang, X., Li, Y., Sun, H. and Zhang, K. (2015) Determination and Generation of the Corrosion Compounds on Silver Exposed to the Atmospheres. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 10, 2336-2354.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abbott, W.H. (1968) The Influence of Environment on Tarnishing Reactions. Proceedings of the 4th ICEC Conference, Paris, 1968, 35-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rice, D., Peterson, P., Rigby, E., Phipps, P., Cappell, R. and Tremoureaux, R. (1981) Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper and Silver. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 128, 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2127403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liang, D., Allen, H.C., Frankel, G.S., Chen, Z.Y., Kelly, R.G., Wu, Y. and Wyslouzil, B.E. (2010) Effects of Sodium Chloride Particles, Ozone, UV, and Relative Humidity on Atmospheric Corrosion of Silver. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 157, 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3310812</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ingo, G.M., Angelini, E., Riccucci, C., de Caro, T., Mezzi, A., Faraldi, F., Caschera, D., Giuliani, C. and Di Carlo, G. (2015) Indoor Environmental Corrosion of Ag-Based Alloys in the Egyptian Museum (Cairo, Egypt). Applied Surface Science, 326, 222-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.135</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wan, Y., Macha, E.N. and Kelly, R.G. (2012) Modification of ASTM B117 Salt Spray Corrosion Test and Its Correlation to Field Measurements of Silver Corrosion. Corrosion, 68. https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3693699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Novakovic, J., Georgiza, E. and Vassiliou, P. (2013) Nano-Alumina Modified Acrylic Coatings for Silver Protection. School of Chemical Engineering, NTUA, Athens, 23-25.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Saad, Z. and Bani Hani, M. (2007) Corrosion Behavior and Preservation of Islamic Silver Alloy Coins.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vassilio, P. and Gouda, V. (2013) Ancient Silver Artefacts: Corrosion Processes and Preservation Strategies. Corrosion and Conservation of Cultural Heritage Metallic Artefacts. In: European Federation of Corrosion (EFC) Series, Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press, Oxford, 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782421573.3.213</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gale, N.H. and Stos-Gale, Z.A. (1981) Ancient Egyptian Silver. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 67, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/3856605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lucas, A. (2011) Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries. 4th Edition, Dover Publications, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abu-Baker, A.N., MacLeod, I.D., Sloggett, R. and Taylor, R. (2013) A Comparative Study of Salicylaldoxime, Cysteine and Benzotriazole as Inhibitors for the Active Chloride-Based Corrosion of Copper and Bronze Artifacts. European Scientific Journal, 9, 1857-7881.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ASTM D5116 (1997) Standard Guide for Small-Scale Environmental Chamber Determinations of Organic Emissions from Indoor Materials/Products.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, J.F. (1967) Humidity Control in the Laboratory Using Salt Solutions—A Review. Journal of Applied Chemistry, 17, 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5010170901</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, M.N., Yu, H.S. and Lee, S.E. (2003) A Small Chamber Test and Oddy Test on Medium Density Fiberboard Grade (E0, E1). Indoor Air Quality in Museums and Historic Properties University of East Anglia, Norwich.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, S., Kim, J.A., An, J.Y., Kim, H.J., Kim, S.D. and Park, J.C. (2007) TVOC and Formaldehyde Emission Behaviors from Flooring Materials Bonded with Environmental-Friendly MF/PVAc Hybrid Resins. Indoor Air, 17, 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00488.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wiesinger, R., Martina, I., Kleber, C. and Schreiner, M. (2013) Influence of Relative Humidity and Ozone on Atmospheric Silver Corrosion. Corrosion Science, 77, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bernard, M.C., Dauvergne, E., Evesque, M., Keddam, M. and Takenouti, H. (2005) Reduction of Silver Tarnishing and Protection against Subsequent Corrosion. Corrosion Science, 47, 663-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, H., Frankel, G.S. and Abbott, W.H. (2013) Analysis of Ag Corrosion Products. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 160, 345-355. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.055308jes</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Franey, J.P., Kammlott, G.W. and Graedel, T.E. (1985) The Corrosion of Silver by Atmospheric Sulfurous Gases. Corrosion Science, 25, 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(85)90104-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sasaki, T., Kanagawa, R., Ohtsuka, T. and Miura, K. (2003) Corrosion Products of tin in Humid Air Containing Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Dioxide at Room Temperature. Corrosion Science, 45, 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00151-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tran, T.T.M., Fiaud, C. and Sutter, E.M.M. (2005) Oxide and Sulphide Layers on Copper Exposed to H2S Containing Moist Air. Corrosion Science, 47, 1724-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.08.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Kodaira, M., Sugimoto, A., Nakayama, S., Watanabe, M., Furuya, S., Minamitani, R., Miyata, Y., Nishikata, A. and Notoya, T. (2005) Cathodic Reduction of the Duplex Oxide Films Formed on Copper in Air with High Relative Humidity at 60 Co, Corrosion Science, 47, 2079-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.09.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niklasson, A., Johansson, L.G. and Svensson, J.E. (2007) Atmospheric Corrosion of Lead, The Influence of Formic Acid and Acetic Acid Vapors. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 154, 618-625. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2775173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lenglet, M., Lopitaux, J., Leygraf, L., Odnevall, I., Carballeira, M., Noualhaguet, J.C., Guinement, J., Gautier, J. and Boissel, J. (1995) Analysis of Corrosion Products Formed on Copper in Cl&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;/H&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;S/NO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Exposure. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3690-3696. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2775173</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Astrup, T., Wadsak, M., Leygraf, C. and Schreinerb, M. (2000) In Situ Studies of the Initial Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper Influence of Humidity, Sulfur Dioxide, Ozone and Nitrogen Dioxide. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 147, 2543-2551. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samie, F., Tidblad, J., Kucera, V. and Leygraf, C. (2005) Atmospheric Corrosion Effects of HNO3-Method Development and Results on Laboratory Exposed Copper. Atmospheric Environment, 39, 7362-7373. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393566</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rickett, B.I. and Payer, J.H. (1995) Composition of Copper Tarnish Products Formed in Moist Air with Trace Levels of Pollutant Gas: Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide/Hydrogen Sulfide. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3723-3728. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2048404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rickett, B.I. and Payer, J.H. (1995) Composition of Copper Tarnish Products Formed in Moist Air with Trace Levels of Pollutant Gas: Sulfur Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide/Nitrogen Dioxide. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 142, 3713-3722. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2048403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tétreault, J., Cano, E., Bommel, M., Scott, D., Dennis, M., Barthés, L., Minel, L. and Robbio, L. (2003) Corrosion of Copper and Lead by Formaldehyde, Formic and Acetic Acid Vapours. Studies in Conservation, 48, 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2003.48.4.237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">López-Delgado, A., Cano, E., Bastidas, J. and López, F. (2001) A Comparative Study on Copper Corrosion Originated by Formic and Acetic Acid Vapours. Journal of Materials Science, 36, 5203-5211. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012497912875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samie, F., Tidblad, J., Kucera, V. and Leygraf, C. (2007) Atmospheric Corrosion Effects of HNO3-Comparison of Laboratory-Exposed Copper, Zinc and Carbon Steel, Atmospheric Environment, 41, 4888-4896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.02.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castano, J.G., de la Fuente, D. and Morcillo, M. (2007) A Laboratory Study of the Effect of NO2 on the Atmospheric Corrosion of Zinc. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 8681-8696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oesch, S. and Faller, M. (1997) Environmental Effects on Materials: The Effect of the Air Pollutants SO2, NO2, NO and O3 on the Corrosion of Copper, Zinc and Aluminium. A Short Literature Survey and Results of Laboratory Exposures. Corrosion Science 39, 1505-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00047-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strandberg, H. and Johansson, L.G. (1997) Role of O3 in the Atmospheric Corrosion of Copper in the Presence of SO2. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 144, 2334-2342. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1837814</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eriksson, P. and Johansson, L.G. (1986) The Role of NO2 in the Atmospheric Corrosion of Different Metals. Proceeding of 10th Scandinavian Corrosion Congress. Stockholm, 43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campin, M.J. (2003) Microstructural Investigation of Copper Corrosion: Influence of Humidity, Ph.D. Dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mariaca, L., de la Fuente, D., Feliu, S., Simancas, J., Gonzalez, J.A. and Morcillo, M. (2008) Interaction of Copper and NO2: Effect of Joint Presence of SO2, Relative Humidity and Temperature. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 69, 895-904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wikipedia (2017) Hydrogen Sulfide. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_sulfide</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wikipedia (2017) Chlorine.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine#cite_ref-Greenwood789_7-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vonderbrink, S.A. (2006) Laboratory Experiments for Advanced Placement Chemistry. 2nd Edition, Flinn Scientific, Inc., Batavia, 87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martina, I., Wiesinger, R., Simbürger, D.J. and Schreiner, M. (2012) Micro-Raman Characterization of Silver Corrosion Products: Instrumental Set Up and Reference Darabase. Preservation Science, 9, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, S.P. (1978) Atmospheric Corrosion of Silver, Copper, and Nickel-Environmental Test. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 125, 2005-2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.10.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.80544-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Volpe, L. and Peterson, P.J. (1989) The Atmospheric Sulfidation of Silver in a Tubular Corrosion Reactor. Corrosion Science, 29, 1179-1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(89)90065-6</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>