<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2017.911080</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-79738</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Chemical Quality of Lake Kyoga at Selected Landing Sites and Anthropogenic Activities
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Robert</surname><given-names>Ongom</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>Andama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ben</surname><given-names>Lukubye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>andamamorgan@gmail.com(MA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>10</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>09</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1225</fpage><lpage>1243</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18,</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20,</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Lake Kyoga, one of the great African lakes in Uganda is facing an increasing pressure from human activities yet there is limited information on water quality of the lake. Therefore this study determined selected physico-chemical parameters of Lake Kyoga at some landing sites (Kayei, Acholi inn, Waitumba, Masindi port) and anthropogenic activities (boat dock, waste site, garden, fishing). The parameters included temperature, pH, water flow rate, dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrite (NO
  <sub>2</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-7px;">-</sup>) and phosphate (PO
  <sub>4</sub>-P). The American Public Health Association (APHA) and Water Watch Australia protocols, standard meters, Merck’s rapid test kits and timing of a float were used to measure the parameters. The results showed that the mean temperature, pH, DO, and PO
  <sub>4</sub>-P significantly (p &lt; 0.05) varied across the anthropogenic activities. On the other hand, only temperature, pH and flow rate varied significantly (p &lt; 0.05) across the landing sites. Lake Kyoga water flow rates were the fastest at Masindi port (0.031 m/s) and the least in Waitumba (0.021 m/s) governed by river inflow and surface vegetation cover. The mean pH (6.73 - 7.15) and DO (10.15 - 13.50 mg/l) of the lake at all the study sites were within the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard values of 5.5 - 8.5 and ≥9.0 mg/l respectively. These mean pH and DO values reflect more or less neutral waters which are equally well saturated with oxygen at all the landing sites. However, areas close to the waste sites had the least oxygen levels (10.15 mg/l) followed by gardens (11.82 mg/l) while fishing areas were the most saturated with oxygen (13.50 mg/l). On the other hand, temperature (25.06&#176;C - 25.76&#176;C) and (0.13 - 0.49 mg/l) levels in the study sites were above EPA standards of 25&#176;C and ≤0.03 mg/l respectively signifying warmer waters and sewage pollution at the sites. Fortunately, the NO
  <sub>2</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-7px;">-</sup> levels were within the EPA drinking water guideline of 0.5 mg/l. The orthophosphates (PO
  <sub>4</sub>-P) were highest in the waste sites (0.35 mg/l), followed by gardens (0.24 mg/l) and least in the fishing areas (0.12 mg/l). However, phosphates in the form of P
  <sub>2</sub>O
  <sub>5</sub> were higher than the EPA standard value (0.5 mg/l) at Kayei (0.55 mg/l) and Acholi inn (0.55 mg/l) landing sites as well as at waste sites (0.80 mg/l) and gardens (0.55 mg/l) pointing to high nutrient (phosphorus) input at these sites. The high concentrations of nitrites in Lake Kyoga at the investigated anthropogenic activities and landing sites plus phosphate amounts close to waste sites and gardens including Kayei and Acholi inn landing sites call for vigilance in protection of Lake Kyoga through optimized planning. Hence, National Environment Management Authority should ensure proper sewage management in Lake Kyoga catchment to avoid discharge of untreated sewage into the lake. The authority should also regulate waste dumping and cultivation around the lake so as to reduce nutrient (phosphorus) enrichment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Anthropogenic Activity</kwd><kwd> Lake Kyoga</kwd><kwd> Landing Site</kwd><kwd> Physico-Chemical Parameter</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Lake Kyoga is one of the African Great Lakes situated in Uganda, East Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref1">1</xref>] . An estimated 9.3 million people live in Lake Kyoga Basin with 85% of the population mainly engaged in agriculture comprised of livestock farming and crop growing as their major industrial activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref3">3</xref>] . Consequently, most of the watershed areas have been rapidly converted into agricultural land and rangelands [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref4">4</xref>] . For instance 48.5% of wetlands in the Lake Kyoga region were lost between 1994 and 2008 alone due to conversion to agriculture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref5">5</xref>] . In addition, about 200,000 people are directly engaged in fishing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref6">6</xref>] and the lake plays an important role for inland water transport [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref7">7</xref>] . Furthermore, most of the inhabitants get water for drinking and other domestic uses directly from the lake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref8">8</xref>] . The above activities have resulted into the disappearance of vegetation as well as gully erosion in Lake Kyoga catchment causing pollution of the lake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref9">9</xref>] . As the number of people and animals increased around Lake Kyoga, more waste from human activities and livestock has been discharged into the lake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref10">10</xref>] leading to nutrient (mainly phosphorus and nitrogen) enrichment.</p><p>Unfortunately, Lake Kyoga is very vulnerable to the impacts of pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref13">13</xref>] . The high nutrient enrichment has transformed the lake from mesotrophic to eutrophic conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] . As a result, there has been an increased algal biomass and dominance by blue-green algae in Lake Kyoga indicating the deterioration of its quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref17">17</xref>] . With the increasing human population and associated activities in the Lake Kyoga catchment, water pollution problems are likely to rise hence there is a need for continuous monitoring. However, previous limnological investigations on Lake Kyoga are few and small in scope as compared to other African lakes and Lake Kyoga basin is the least studied of the Nile tributaries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref18">18</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref23">23</xref>] . Hence this study determined the physico-chemical quality of Lake Kyoga at the most common anthropogenic activities (boat dock, waste site, garden and fishing areas) with high water pollution potential in selected landing sites within the lake basin.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Location of Study Area</title><p>Lake Kyoga (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) is located north of Lake Victoria (lat. 1˚15' - 1˚45'N; long. 31˚31' - 33˚31'E) at an altitude of 1100 m on the central African plateau. The Kyoga aquatic system is comprised of three major lakes namely Kyoga (1821 km<sup>2</sup>, length 190 km), Kwania (508 km<sup>2</sup>, 105 km) and Bisinia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref24">24</xref>] . Lake Kyoga is a shallow lake of about 3.6 m mean depth and the total surface area of open water of Kyoga lakes is about 2700 km<sup>2</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref1">1</xref>] . The lakes lie within a 74,700 km<sup>2</sup> Lake Kyoga catchment area with numerous wetlands in central Uganda [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref25">25</xref>] . Lake Kyoga Catchment area falls in the larger River Nile Basin, stretching from the Great Lakes region (Burundi, Rwanda, The Democratic Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya) to North Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref10">10</xref>] . The dense swamps that surround the shores of Lake Kyoga with an area coverage of 2000 km<sup>2</sup> are mainly extensive mats of papyrus comprising of Cyperus papyrus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref26">26</xref>] . The largest inflow into Lake Kyoga comes from Lake Victoria through the Victoria Nile while Lake Kyoga drains out through the Kyoga Nile connecting to Lake Albert [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] . Most of the rocks in Lake Kyoga basin are gneisses and granites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref2">2</xref>] consisting mainly of feldspar and quartz. Feldspar is a group of silicate minerals comprising of (Si, Al)O<sub>4</sub> linked with K, Na, and Ca and sometimes Ba ions while quartz consists of crystalline silica (silicon dioxide, SiO<sub>2</sub>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Lake Kyoga basin experiences a bi-modal rainfall distribution pattern with two peak rainfall periods in April/May and October/November while the rest of the months (March-November) have well-spread distribution of rainfall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref28">28</xref>] . The basin, however, receives low rainfall during December, January and February [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref28">28</xref>] . The mean annual rainfall in Lake Kyoga basin is 1294 mm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Four landing sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) were thus purposively selected from Lake Kyoga including Waitumba at geographical coordinates (1.6993˚N, 32.0988˚E), Masindi port (1.6986˚N, 32.0982˚E), Acholi inn (1.6726˚N, 32.2601˚E) and Kayei (1.6767˚N, 32.3934˚E) to investigate the contribution of associated anthropogenic activities; fishing, waste disposal, farming and transport (boat dock) to the physico-chemical quality of the lake.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling</title><p>At each of the landing sites (Kayei, Acholi inn, Waitumba and Masindi port), water samples and on-site measurements were taken at every established anthropogenic activity (boat dock, waste site, garden and fishing areas). For temperature, pH and DO, 6 on-site measurements were each taken during the mid morning, afternoon and evening, totalling to 18 measurements for every parameter at each anthropogenic activity. On the other hand, only 6 water samples were obtained to determine nitrite and phosphate concentrations and 6 on-site flow rate measurements taken at each anthropogenic activity, all during the mid morning period. The water samples and measurements were taken at a distance of 10 m from one another in an area of about 2500 m<sup>2</sup>. All the water sampling and measurements were done in the months of December, 2015 and January, 2016.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Determination of the Physico-Chemical Parameters</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Temperature</title><p>Dissolved Oxygen and temperature were determined using a simple DO meter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref29">29</xref>] . After rinsing the tip of the DO meter electrode with distilled water, it was then dipped into the water at the sampling points and left for some time until the readings stabilized. The stable DO and corresponding temperature values were then read and recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. pH</title><p>The pH of the water samples was determined using a pH meter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref30">30</xref>] . The pH meter was also dipped into the water at the sampling points and left for some time for the readings to stabilize. The stable pH values of the water were also read and recorded.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Water Current or Flow Rate</title><p>The water current (flow rate) was determined by timing a float [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref31">31</xref>] . Four eucalyptus plant leaves of almost equal weights were set on the water surface one after another and allowed to flow over a distance of 2 m and the time taken for each leaf to cover the distance recorded in seconds. The average time taken by the four leaves was then determined. This was repeated for each of the six sampling points. Then the water current or flow rate, V was then calculated from the expression, V = distance/time.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Nitrite ( NO 2 − )</title><p>Nitrite ( NO 2 − ) concentrations were determined colorimetrically using Merck’s rapid test kits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref32">32</xref>] . The kit was opened and set up with both tubes on the left. The comparator block was slid all the way to the left so that the end holding the tubes protrudes laterally over the bottom part of the box. The color card was unfolded and inserted with the coloured end first into the slit at the lower right hand edge of the box. Water sample (5 ml) was obtained from the sampling bottles using a syringe and then injected into test tube A (measurement sample) while the same volume of distilled water was injected into test tube B (blank). One microspoonful of NO<sub>2</sub>-l reagent was obtained and added to test tube A with the sample and then it was closed, shaken vigorously until the reagent was completely dissolved. The test tube was left to stand for 3 minutes. The sample test tube with the reagent and the control test tube were placed into the slit. The colour card was slid through to the left until the closest possible colour match was achieved between the two open test tubes when viewed from above. NO 2 − concentrations in mg/l were read from the colour card at the lower right hand edge of the comparator block within the bottom part of the box.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Phosphate (PO<sub>4</sub>-P)</title><p>Phosphate (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) concentrations were also determined colorimetrically using Merck’s rapid test kits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref33">33</xref>] . The kit was opened and set up with both tubes placed in the comparator slits behind the colour disk. Water sample (6 ml) was obtained from the sampling bottles using a syringe and injected into test tube A (measurement sample) and same volume of distilled water was injected into test tube B (blank) while placed in the comparator slits behind the colour disk. Five drops of PO<sub>4</sub>-1 reagent was added into test tube A while kept in a vertical position and then it was closed, shaken vigorously until the reagent was completely dissolved. The test tube was left to stand for 1 minute in the slit of the comparator disk. The comparator was held to the light while kept upright and the disk rotated until the closest possible colour match was achieved between the two large windows of the comparator. PO<sub>4</sub>-P concentrations in mg/l were read off in the small window of the comparator.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Data Analysis</title><p>The data were summarized in form of descriptive statistics (minimum, maximum, standard deviation, mean, standard error of the mean) and presented in tables and bar graphs. Comparisons of the physico-chemical parameters across the various landing sites and anthropogenic activities were carried out using one way ANOVA (F test) and Kruskal Wallis (H) test while relationships between the parameters explored using spearman’s correlation coefficient (r<sub>s</sub>). The above tests were done after verifications of the assumptions of normality of data and homogeneity of variance using Kolmogorov Smirnov (KS) and Levene (L) tests respectively. All the inferences were made at 5% level of significance with the analyses done using Microsoft Excel 2007 and SPSS 20 Computer packages.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physico-Chemical Parameters in Lake Kyoga</title><p>The physico-chemical parameters across the various anthropogenic activities in the landing sites are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Temperature</title><p>Temperature as a physico-chemical parameter influences the overall quality of water through its effects on the physicochemical and biological characteristics of the water body including the rate of chemical reactions, solubility of gases e.g. oxygen etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref34">34</xref>] . Temperature varied significantly (p &lt; 0.05) across the various landing sites and human activities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) though with low variability within the samples, i.e. CV (landing sites = 1.87% - 2.26%; human activities = 1.70% - 2.16%). Kayei had the highest temperature (25.54˚C) while Masindi port had the least (25.12˚C). On the other hand, waste sites recorded the highest temperature (25.76˚C) and gardens the least (25.06˚C). Temperature values also showed significant (p &lt; 0.05) variations at the anthropogenic activities in each of the landing sites with waste sites having the highest temperature in most of the landing sites except in Waitumba where temperature was highest at the fishing site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The slightly higher temperature at Kayei is due to the relatively lower water flow rate while the low temperature value at Masindi port is associated with mixing of water as a result of high flow rate. This is supported by the fact that flow rate was significantly negatively correlated with temperature (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.49, p = 0.02, n = 24) and Masindi port recorded significantly (p = 0.05) the highest flow rate than other landing sites. With an average depth of only 3.6 meters, Lake Kyoga waters can easily be mixed. According to Beadle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref35">35</xref>] , Lake Kyoga is a polymictic lake which mixes on daily basis. Shallow water bodies have a high over turn which prevents them from undergoing thermal stratification from top to bottom. Due to the mixing, no heat storage occurs in any zone of the water body resulting into a general uniform low temperature of the shallow water body. The heat in the epilimnion zone is rather distributed uniformly to the lower cool layers of the water body hence a uniform low temperature in the entire water body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref36">36</xref>] . The high temperature values in the waste sites may be attributed to the high decomposition of the wastes. According to Juma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref37">37</xref>] , decomposition of organic matter releases energy locked in bonds of the organic substances inform of heat thus raising the temperature at the waste sites more than other sites.</p><p>On the other hand, the low temperatures at the garden site may be due to increased mixing of the water near the garden despite the decomposition of organic matter from the garden. However, the temperature values in the study sites</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Descriptive statistics of the physico-chemical parameters of Lake Kyoga across different landing sites and anthropogenic activities and comparison using one way ANOVA (F) and Kruskal Wallis (H) tests</title></caption><table-wrap id="1_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Location</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site/Activity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Min.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Max.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean &#177; SE</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F<sup>a</sup> or H<sup>b</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>]</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Temperature (˚C) (n = 72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Landing Site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.54 &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >23.25<sup>b</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acholi inn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.39 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waitumba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.36 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masindi port</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.12 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Human Activity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boat dock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.30 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >63.19<sup>b</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waste site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.76 &#177; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garden</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.06 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.30 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >pH (n = 72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Landing Site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.88 &#177; 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >21.80<sup>b</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >5.5 - 8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acholi inn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.90 &#177; 0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waitumba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.90 &#177; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masindi port</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.15 &#177; 0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Human Activity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boat dock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.01 &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >58.95<sup>b</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waste site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.73 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garden</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.99 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.11 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >Flow rate (m/s)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Landing Site (n = 6) (F<sub>3,20</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >3.07<sup>a</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acholi inn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.025 &#177; 0.003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waitumba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013 &#177; 0.004</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masindi port</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.015</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031 &#177; 0.007</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Human Activity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garden (n = 24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.841</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.021 &#177; 0.003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >DO (mg/l) (n = 72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Landing Site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.23 &#177; 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >4.48<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >≥9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acholi inn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.94 &#177; 0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waitumba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.09 &#177; 0.30</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masindi port</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.06 &#177; 0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Human Activity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boat dock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.84 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >79.28<sup>b</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waste site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.15 &#177; 0.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garden</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.82 &#177; 0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.50 &#177; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Nitrite, NO 2 − (mg/l) (n = 24)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Landing Site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.45<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >≤0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acholi inn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31 &#177; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waitumba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 &#177; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masindi port</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28 &#177; 0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="1_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Human Activity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Boat dock</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >69.49</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 &#177; 0.03</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >26.80<sup>b</sup>*</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waste site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garden</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32 &#177; 0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >Phosphate, PO<sub>4</sub>∙P (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>), mg/l, (n = 24) 1 mg/l PO<sub>4</sub>∙P = 2.29 mg/l P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref33">33</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Landing Site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kayei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 (1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21 (0.48)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 &#177; 0.04 (0.55 &#177; 0.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >3.99<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="8"  >0.5 (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acholi inn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 (1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18 (0.41)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 &#177; 0.04 (0.55 &#177; 0.09)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waitumba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6 (1.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16 (0.37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.03 (0.46 &#177; 0.07)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Masindi port</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 (1.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 (0.27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16 &#177; 0.03 (0.37 &#177; 0.07)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Human Activity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Boat dock</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 (0.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09 (0.21)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13 &#177; 0.02 (0.30 &#177; 0.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >24.22<sup>b</sup>*</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Waste site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1 (0.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 (1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 (0.46)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35 &#177; 0.04 (0.80 &#177; 0.09)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Garden</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7 (1.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17 (0.39)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 &#177; 0.03 (0.55 &#177; 0.07)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fishing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0 (0.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3 (0.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09 (0.21)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12 &#177; 0.02 (0.27 &#177; 0.05)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>*Significant (p ≤ 0.05); Min.―minimum; Max.―maximum; SD―standard deviation; SE―Standard error of the mean; CV.―coefficient of variation; F―data normally distributed and same variances; H―data not normally distributed and variances are different; Kolmogorov-Smirnov p &gt; 0.05, normally distributed; Lp―Levene p &gt; 0.05, same variances.</p><p>with an overall average of 25.35˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) were slightly lower than the range of water temperatures of Lake Kyoga (26˚C - 30˚C) reported by Hughes and Hughes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref38">38</xref>] and those for some small lakes (26˚C - 28˚C) in the basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] . However the recorded temperatures at the study sites were slightly higher than the standard of 25˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] evidencing warmer waters. According to Mungoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref26">26</xref>] , Lake Kyoga can be categorized as warm polymictic. Furthermore, sampling was done during the months of December and January with low rainfall and high maximum temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref40">40</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. pH</title><p>pH is the negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration of a solution and is a measure of whether the liquid is acidic or alkaline. It ranges from 1 (very acidic) to 14 (very alkaline) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . The pH of a water body is a useful parameter as most biological activities of organisms occur within a narrow pH range. There are fatal consequences posed to a particular organism in case pH varies beyond the required limit [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref41">41</xref>] . pH values also govern several other important parameters of water quality, e.g. ammonia toxicity, chlorine disinfection efficiency, and metal solubility [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . There was a significant (p &lt; 0.05) variation of pH across the various landing sites and human activities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) with also low variability within samples (CV; landing sites = 4.26 - 5.03%; human activities = 2.0% - 7.78%). Masindi port registered the highest pH (7.15) while Kayei had the lowest (6.88). On the other hand, fishing areas recorded the highest pH (7.11) and waste sites the least (6.73). pH also significantly varied (p &lt; 0.05) at the anthropogenic activities in each of the landing sites with fishing sites having the highest pH in most of the landing sites except in Masindi port where pH was highest at the waste site (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The waste sites recorded the least pH in the rest of the landing sites.</p><p>The least pH at the waste sites followed by garden is associated with the production of organic acids during the decomposition of organic wastes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref42">42</xref>] . As the amount of available dissolved oxygen required for the decomposition of organic constituents (carbohydrates, proteins and lipids) of the organic matter in the waste sites and gardens decreases, the organic compounds undergo anaerobic fermentation processes leading to ammonia and organic acids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] . For instance, decomposition of organic matter forms humus which produces a lot of humic acids especially in agricultural areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref42">42</xref>] . Hydrolysis of these acidic materials causes a decrease of water pH values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] . The high pH at Masindi port may be attributed to the mixing of the water due to the slightly high water flow rate despite the formation of the acidic compounds from the decomposition of organic matter from the waste sites. The overall temperature was significantly negatively correlated with pH (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.23, p = 0.00, n = 288) since decomposition of organic wastes also generates some heat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>Fishing areas are relatively deeper portions of the lake with less organic matter hence low decomposition compared to the shallower shoreline areas used as boat dock with a lot of organic matter hence increased decomposition thus justifying the high pH in the fishing areas and the relatively low pH at the boat docks. However, the pH values in the study sites (6.73 - 7.15) with an overall average of 6.96 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) were below the pH range (7.6 - 9.0) of Lake Kyoga obtained by Hughes and Hughes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref38">38</xref>] . However, the obtained pH values of the lake were within the pH range of 5.5 - 8.5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . The obtained pH values of Lake Kyoga are also circumneutral to slightly alkaline similar to the pH of most small lakes in Lake Kyoga basin. This can also be attributed to the high buffering capacity of Lake Kyoga as previously reported by NaFIRRI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] for the small lakes in the basin.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_3"><title>3.1.3. Flow Rate</title><p>Measuring the flow rate of water is the first step to good water management [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref31">31</xref>] . Flow rate significantly (p &lt; 0.05) varied across the various landing sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) with high variability within the samples (CV = 27.58% - 82.66%). Masindi port recorded the highest flow rate (0.031 m/s) while Waitumba had the least (0.013 m/s). The overall flow rate with the measurements taken near gardens is 0.021 m/s.</p><p>The difference in the rate of water flow at the selected landing sites is due to their relative proximity to river Kafu that pours its waters into the lake and causes a drag of water increasing its flow. According to NEMA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref10">10</xref>] , river Kafu which straddles the border of Nakasongola and Masindi channels into Lake Kyoga. Masindi port being the closest to the river has the highest flow rate. Gibb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref44">44</xref>] earlier on reported that the water balance of Lake Kyoga and its catchment area including the Kafu has a seasonal effect on the flows at Masindi Port just below the outlet from the lake. Slightly opposite Masindi port is Waitumba landing site but with the least flow rate. This anomaly of flow rate at Waitumba landing site would be attributed to the relative curve created by papyrus and water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) around this site which is also located close to the shoreline. The papyrus and water hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes) tend to absorb the dragging effect of water reducing on the water velocity. According to Twongo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref45">45</xref>] , the shore environments of Lake Kyoga with potential for the establishment and proliferation of water hyacinth are sheltered from violent off-shore and along-the-shore wind and wave action. However, the obtained average flow rate (0.021 m/s) is relatively low probably attributed to low rainfall, i.e. dry periods during the sampling months (December, January). According to Vega et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] , flow rate decreases in the dry seasons. Generally, the buffering capacity of the lake from acidic conditions increased with flow rate thus the significant positive correlation between flow rate and pH (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.45, p = 0.03, n = 24). They further stated that flow rate causes dilution of contaminants.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_4"><title>3.1.4. Dissolved Oxygen (DO)</title><p>Dissolved oxygen (DO) is a useful water quality parameter and an index of physical and biological processes in water which favor solubility of oxygen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref46">46</xref>] . Organic matter discharged into oxygen saturated waters as food source is broken down into less complex organic substances by aerobic bacteria. However, the rate of bacterial uptake of oxygen outstrips DO replenishment from the atmosphere and photosynthesis in case of large quantity of wastes, hence creating anaerobic conditions in the water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, there was relatively high variability of DO within the samples across the various landing sites and human activities, i.e. CV (landing sites = 15.71% - 21.33%; human activities = 6.36% - 28.96%). Kayei recorded the highest DO (12.23mg/l) and Acholi inn, the lowest (11.94 mg/l) but the differences in DO values within the landing sites were insignificant (p &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The overall mean of DO at the study sites was 12.08 mg/l (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). According to a report by NaFIRRI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] , most Kyoga basin lakes are well aerated with minimum DO concentration always above 5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>. Hence all the studied landing sites with mean DO above 5 mg/l and insignificant DO variations are equally aerated. Furthermore, the obtained DO concentrations at all the study sites of the lake were within the standard value of ≥9.0 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . Mungoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref26">26</xref>] , earlier on reported that Lake Kyoga is saturated with DO most of the time with measurements ranging between 87% - 126% DO saturation.</p><p>On the other hand, DO varied significantly (p &lt; 0.05) across the various human activities. Fishing areas had the highest DO (13.5 mg/l) and the waste sites the least (10.15 mg/l). DO values significant (p &lt; 0.05) varied across anthropogenic activities in most of the landing sites except in Acholi inn where there was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). However in all the landing sites, the fishing areas had the highest DO followed by boat dock, garden and lastly the waste sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The low DO in the waste sites is associated with increased decomposition of organic matter which requires oxygen especially during aerobic decomposition. According to Kristensen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref47">47</xref>] , oxygen plays two important functions during the degradation of organic matter, i.e. is a terminal electron acceptor for electrons released during oxidation of organic carbon and is a reactant in the oxygenase catalyzed primary attack on the substrate molecules. Thus high levels of organic matter consume large amounts of oxygen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>The high DO in the fishing areas may be attributed to either low decomposition of little organic matter in the fishing areas or low coverage of the water surface by any vegetation mat which hinders the dissolution of oxygen. Fishermen also usually clear any surface vegetation covering to create way for fishing. The least recorded minimum DO was at the garden site in Kayei (1.3 mg/l) also attributable to decomposition of organic matter from the garden. The least minimum DO was below the minimum DO (3.8 mg/l) recorded in some of the small lakes in Kyoga basin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>The decomposition of organic matter by aerobic bacteria (which uses oxygen) forms humic acid thus lowering pH. This justifies the significant positive correlation between pH and DO (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.38, p = 0.00, n = 96). The significant positive correlation between pH and DO could also be attributed to increased photosynthesis in the lake. According to Lukubye and Andama [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref48">48</xref>] , high photosynthetic rates in low-velocity waters which reduce the available carbon dioxide (increasing the pH) would liberate oxygen leading to positive correlation between DO and pH. On overall, there was also a significant positive correlation between DO and flow rate (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.69, p = 0.00, n = 24) signifying that high water flow rate enhances mixing of the water hence increased oxygen circulation in the lake. Vega et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] , obtained higher flow rate and dissolved oxygen, an indication of a better water quality. As expected, temperature was significantly negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.36, p = 0.00, n = 288) since solubility of oxygen in water decreases with increase in temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref50">50</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_5"><title>3.1.5. Nitrites ( NO 2 − )</title><p>Nitrite ( NO 2 − ) is one of the forms of nitrogen which usually occurs in minute concentrations with even relatively low levels in the waste treatment plant effluents since nitrogen tends to exist in the more reduced (ammonia; NH<sub>3</sub>) or more oxidised (nitrate; NO<sub>3</sub>) forms. Unpolluted waters have low nitrite (&lt;0.03 mg/l) and values above 0.03 mg/l may indicate sewage pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . Hence the significance of nitrite is mainly as an indicator of any likely sewage pollution. Nitrite is also a direct toxicant with some carcinogenic effects thus stricter nitrite limit in drinking waters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that there was high variability of NO 2 − within the samples across the various landing sites and human activities (CV, landing sites = 78.35% - 90.85%; human activities = 56.84% - 69.99%). Nitrites did not vary significantly (p &gt; 0.05) in the different landing sites though Acholi inn recorded the highest NO 2 − (0.31 mg/l) while Waitumba the lowest value (0.25 mg/l). On the other hand, NO 2 − concentrations were significantly (p &lt; 0.05) different in the various human activities. Waste sites had the highest NO 2 − (0.49 mg/l) and the fishing areas the least (0.13 mg/l). Nitrites significantly (p &lt; 0.05) varied across the anthropogenic activities in most of the landing sites except in Kayei where there was no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05). Nitrites were highest in the waste sites followed by garden, boat dock and least in the fishing areas in most of the landing sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The high NO 2 − in the waste sites followed by garden and boat dock is due to the decomposition of organic matter (animal wastes and plant remains) from the waste sites and gardens. At low oxygen concentrations, the organic compounds (carbohydrates, proteins and lipids) in the organic matter from the waste sites and gardens usually undergo anaerobic fermentation processes forming ammonia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] . Since nitrite is an intermediate product in the oxidisation of ammonia to nitrate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] , the higher the amount of ammonia, the more the nitrite concentrations hence the high NO 2 − levels in the waste sites followed by gardens respectively. Since the oxidation of ammonia in the animal and human wastes as well as from decomposition of plant remains requires oxygen, the significant negative correlation of DO with NO 2 − (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.72, p = 0.00, n = 96) is likely. Vega et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] stated that nitrogen compounds are anti-correlated with dissolved oxygen as organic matter is partially oxidized by oxygen.</p><p>The generated H<sup>+</sup> from the oxidation of ammonia or from the production of organic acids during the decomposition of organic matter (e.g. humic acids) creates some acid conditions thus the significant negative correlation of pH with NO 2 − (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.43, p = 0.00, n = 96). Furthermore, as the decomposition of organic matter (forming NO 2 − as one of the intermediate products) generates heat, there is increase in temperature hence the significant positive correlation of temperature with NO 2 − (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.40, p = 0.00, n = 96). Fishing areas with the least NO 2 − levels are relatively deeper portions of the lake which receive less animal and human wastes hence low NO 2 − . There was also a significant negative correlation between flow rate and NO 2 − (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.52, p = 0.01, n = 24). According to Vega et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] , flow rate dilutes pollutants of anthropogenic origin hence the negative correlation with nitrites.</p><p>The insignificant variation of NO 2 − levels in the different landing sites on Lake Kyoga may be attributed to uniform disposal of sewage (animal and human wastes) and agricultural wastes in the landing sites from the increased numbers of animals and people in the catchment. Furthermore NO 2 − levels in all the study sites were above the standard value of 0.03 mg/l [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] confirming the increased sewage pollution in the study sites. Moreover the wastes including sewage disposed in Kyoga catchment are untreated. This is confirmed by a recommendation by the people within Lake Kyoga basin to purify wastes around the lake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref8">8</xref>] . According to Cohen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref4">4</xref>] , pollution problems are compounded for the African Great Lakes including Lake Kyoga by pollutant disposal. Most urban areas around the lakes have either very limited or no sewage treatment capacity hence raw sewage is discharged directly into the lakes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref51">51</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_6"><title>3.1.6. Phosphates (PO<sub>4</sub>-P)</title><p>The importance of phosphorus is mainly in regard to the phenomenon of eutrophication of lakes. Phosphorus and nitrogen promote the growth of algae leading to blooms. Orthophosphate (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) is the most readily used form of phosphates for the growth of algae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] including other phytoplanktons. Hence the determination of orthophosphate highlights the presence of one of the most important nutrients especially in waters receiving sewage discharges [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] . Phosphates (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) also exhibited high variability within the samples across the various landing sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and human activities (CV, landing sites = 75.33% - 89.37%; human activities = 59.0% - 74.41%). There was also no significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) in the mean values of PO<sub>4</sub>-P across the different landing sites much as Acholi inn and Kayei recorded the highest PO<sub>4</sub>-P concentrations (0.24 mg/l) while Masindi port had the least value (0.16 mg/l). However, PO<sub>4</sub>-P concentrations showed significant (p &lt; 0.05) variation in the various human activities. Similarly PO<sub>4</sub>-P was highest at the waste sites (0.35 mg/l) and lowest in the fishing areas (0.12 mg/l). PO<sub>4</sub>-P only differed significantly (p &lt; 0.05) in the various anthropogenic activities in Kayei landing site whereas there was no significant difference in the rest of the landing sites. The highest PO<sub>4</sub>-P levels were also recorded in the waste sites followed by garden, boat dock and the least in the fishing areas in the majority of the landing sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>The high PO<sub>4</sub>-P in the waste sites followed by garden and boat dock is due to the potential source of PO<sub>4</sub>-P from the wastes and plant remains from the gardens. According to Lavelle and Spain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref52">52</xref>] , organic matter decomposition is a good source of nitrogen and phosphorus. NEMA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref10">10</xref>] reported an increase in wastes into Lake Kyoga (and associated plant nutrients―nitrogen and phosphorous) hence enriched nutrients (e.g. phosphates) into the lake. Additionally, Breeuwsma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref53">53</xref>] reported that animal wastes and plant remains enrich the waters with phosphates. Furthermore, boat docks are located in the shallower shoreline areas which receive a lot of organic matter from the land surface and the bottom of the lake is constantly disturbed by the docking of the boat and this easily circulates the phosphates to the upper surface. Twongo et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref45">45</xref>] found out that the shore environment of Lake Kyoga is characterised by a muddy bottom rich in organic matter with relatively shallower water. On the other hand, PO<sub>4</sub>-P concentrations were also low in the fishing areas attributable to the fact that fishing areas are relatively deeper portions of the lake which receive less plant remains and organic matter and their bottom sediments (potential source of nutrients, i.e. P) are less disturbed hence low PO<sub>4</sub>-P concentrations in their upper photosynthetic zones. Hecky and Bugenyi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref12">12</xref>] found higher phosphorus (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) concentrations near the mud surface and lower in the upper photosynthetic zone of Lake Kyoga. However the relatively low overall phosphates (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) in the study sites may be associated with less transportation of the phosphates into the lake due to low rainfall since sampling was done in December and January i.e., months with low rainfall [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Aerobic decomposition of the organic matter (with the production of humic acid) to release phosphates also utilizes oxygen thus a significant negative correlation of DO with PO<sub>4</sub>-P (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.66, p = 0.00, n = 96). Furthermore, Vega et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] also reported that phosphorous compounds are negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen as organic matter is partially oxidized by oxygen. Similarly, pH was significantly negatively correlated with PO<sub>4</sub>-P (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.45, p = 0.00, n = 96). On the other hand, as the decomposition process (forming PO<sub>4</sub>-P) generates heat, it increases the temperature hence the significant positive correlation of temperature with PO<sub>4</sub>-P (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.40, p = 0.00, n = 96). Since the nitrites and phosphates are produced by the same material i.e. mainly decomposition of organic matter, there is a significant positive correlation between NO 2 − and PO<sub>4</sub>-P (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.67, p = 0.01, n = 96). Similarly, the significant negative correlation of flow rate with PO<sub>4</sub>-P (r<sub>s</sub> = −0.74, p = 0.00, n = 24) is expected since increase in flow rate causes dilution of contaminants of anthropogenic origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref43">43</xref>] .</p><p>The insignificant variation of PO<sub>4</sub>-P concentrations in the different landing sites on Lake Kyoga concurs with the report by NaFIRRI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] which showed that phosphates (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) were relatively evenly distributed in Lake Kyoga. Whereas the even distribution of phosphates (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) reported by NaFIRRI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] was attributed to natural phenomena, the insignificant variation in this study may be due to comparatively equal contribution of PO<sub>4</sub>-P by the investigated anthropogenic activities in the selected landing sites. The levels of phosphates (PO<sub>4</sub>-P) when converted to P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> exceeds the standard value of 0.5 mg/l [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref39">39</xref>] especially in Kayei and Acholi landing sites as well as at the waste sites and gardens possibly due to increased human activities in the catchment at those sites. According to NaFIRRI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.79738-ref14">14</xref>] , the present elevated levels of phosphates in Lake Kyoga are mainly caused by human activities in the catchment.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The high concentrations of nitrites in Lake Kyoga at the investigated anthropogenic activities and landing sites plus phosphate amounts close to waste sites and gardens including Kayei and Acholi inn landing sites call for vigilance in protection of Lake Kyoga through optimized planning.</p><p>Hence, National Environment Management Authority should ensure proper sewage management in Lake Kyoga catchment to avoid discharge of untreated sewage into the lake. The authority should also regulate waste dumping and cultivation around the lake so as to reduce nutrient (phosphorus) enrichment.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors wish to acknowledge the technical support of National Water and Sewerage Corporation, Masindi especially during sampling and analysis of the water parameters. The authors also extend appreciation to the Department of Biology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology for the guidance and support during the entire research period and preparation of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ongom, R., Andama, M. and Lukubye, B. (2017) Physico-Chemical Quality of Lake Kyoga at Selected Landing Sites and Anthropogenic Activities. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 1225-1243. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.911080</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.79738-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogutu-Ohwayo, R., Hecky, R.E., Cohen, A.S. and Kaufman, L. (1997) Human Impacts on the African Great Lakes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 50, 117-131. 
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007320932349</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2011) The Development Study on Water Resources Development and Management for Lake Kyoga Basin in the Republic of Uganda. Final Report Summary. Ministry of Water and Environment.  
http://open_jicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12025201_01.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaggwa, R., Hogan, R. and Gowa, E. (2004) Policy Brief: Land Use Change, Land Degradation and Human Welfare: Lessons Learned from the Lake Kyoga catchment Area. UNDP-UNEP Poverty-Environment Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cohen, A.S., Kaufman, L. and Ogutu-Ohwayo, R. (1996) Anthropogenic Threats, Impacts and Conservation Strategies in the African Great Lakes—A Review. In: Johnson, T.C. and Odada, E., Eds., The Limnology, Climatology and Paleoclimatology of the East African Lakes, Gordon &amp; Breach Scientific Publishers, Toronto, Canada.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ministry of Water and Environment, Wetland Management Department (2010) State of Wetlands Report. Ministry of water and Environment, Kampala.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gyllenhammar, A. (2017) Using Modeling, Gis and Remote Sensing to Understand an African Lake. http://wldb.ilec.or.jp/ILBMTrainingMaterials/resources/Kyoga.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">State of the River Nile Basin (2012) The Role of Inland Water Transport in Support of Further Regional Integration.http://nileis.nilebasin.org/system/files/Nile%20SoB%20Report%20Chapter%207%20-%20Transport.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fisheries Training Institute (2004) Selected Fish Landing Sites and Fishing Communities. Survey Undertaken by Fisheries Training Institute for the DFID Project: Impacts of Globalisation on Fish Utilisation and Marketing Systems in Uganda.  
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08cd8e5274a31e00014b2/R8112k.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) (2001) National State of the Environment Report for Uganda, 2000/2001. National Enviornment Management Authority (NEMA), Kampala.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) (2008) Pilot Integrated Environment Assessment of the Lake Kyoga Catchment Area. National Environment Management Authority (NEMA), Kampala.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Coulter, G.W. and Jackson, P.N.B. (1981) Deep Lakes. In: Symoens, J., Burgis, M. and Gaudet, J., Eds., The Ecology and Utilization of African Inland Waters, UNEP Reports and Proceedings Series 1, 114-124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hecky, R.E. and Bugenyi, F.W.B. (1992) Hydrology and Chemistry of the Great Lakes and Water Quality Issues: Problems and Solutions. Mitteilungen Internationale Vereinigung für Limnologie, 23, 45-54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bootsma, H. and Hecky, R.E. (1993) Conservation of the African Great Lakes: A Limnological Perspective. Conservation Biology, 7, 644-656. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030644.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Fisheries Resources Research Institute, NaFIRRI (2007) A Study on Stock Enhancement/Restocking of the Kyoga Basin Lakes. A Review of Kyoga Basin Lakes. National Fisheries Resources Research Institute (NaFIRRI), Jinja.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magezi, G., Mugidde, R. and Naluwairo, J. (2000) Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Algal Production of the Kyoga Basin Lakes and Rivers. In: Proceedings of a Stakeholder Workshop on Kyoga Basin lakes, Management of the Fish Stocks, Biodiversity and the Environment of Kyoga, National Fisheries Resources Research Institute, Jinja.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndawula, L., Twongo, T. and Magezi, G. (2001) The Role of Lake Productivity Process in Fishery Production. In: Proceedings of a Training Workshop towards Empowering Fisheries Officers to Manage the Fish Stocks, Biodiversity and Environment of Kyoga Basin Lakes, National Fisheries Resources Research, Jinja.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Twongo, T. (2002) The Fisheries and Environment of Kyoga Lakes. A Review Prepared for the Cooperative for Relief Everywhere (CARE).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evans, J.H. (1962a) The Distribution of Phytoplankton in Some Central East African Waters. Hydrobiologia, 19, 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042989</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Evans, J.H. (1962b) Some New Records and Forms of Algae in Central East Africa. Hydrobiologia, 20, 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038736</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Talling, J.F. and Talling, I.B. (1965) The Chemical Composition of African Lake Waters. International Review of Hydrobiology, 51, 545-621.  
https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.19660510402</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Visser</surname><given-names> S.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1974</year>)<article-title>Composition of Waters of Lakes and Rivers in East and West Africa</article-title><source> African Journal of Tropical Hydrobiology and Fisheries</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 43</fpage>-<lpage>60</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beadle, L.C. (1974) The Inland Waters of Tropical Africa. An Introduction to Tropical Limnology. Longman, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, E. and Sutcliffe, J.V. (2013) The Water Balance of Lake Kyoga, Uganda. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58, 342-353.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.753148</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Burgis, M. and Symoens, J.J. (1987) Lake Kyoga and Associated Lakes. In: African Wetlands and Shallow Water Bodies.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Twongo, T. (1991) The Fisheries of the Kyoga Lakes and the Likely Impact on Them by Human Activities in the Catchment. Uganda Freshwater Fisheries Research Organization, Jinja.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mungoma, S. (1988) Horizontal Differentiation in the Limnology of a Tropical River-Lake (Lake Kyoga, Uganda). Hydrobiologia, 162, 89-96.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014336</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oxford University Press (2010) A Dictionary of Science. 6th Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nsubuga, F.W.N., Botai, O.J., Olwoch, J.M., Rautenbach, C.J., Bevis, Y. and Adetunji, A.O. (2014) The Nature of Rainfall in the Main Drainage Sub-Basins of Uganda. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59, 278-299.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.804188</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American Public Health Association (2012) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Waste Water. 22nd Edition, American Public Health Association Press, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Water Watch Australia (2002) National Technical Manual. Module 4: Physical and Chemical Parameters. Water Watch Australia Steering Committee Environment, Australia. http://www.waterwatch.org.au</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trimmer, W. (1994) Estimating Water Flow Rates. Oregon State University Website.  
http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/pdf/ec1369.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merck (2011) Nitrite Test. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt.  
http://www.merck-chemicals.com/colorimetric-test-kits</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merck (2011) Phosphate Test: For the Determination of Orthophosphate. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt. http://www.merck-chemicals.com/colorimetric-test-kits</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olajire, A.A. and Imeokparia, F.E. (2001) Water Quality Assessment of Osun River: Studies on Inorganic Nutrients. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 69, 17-22.  
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010796410829</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beadle, L.C. (1981) Inland Waters of Tropical Africa. 2nd Edition, Longman Group Limited, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United Nations Environment Programme and World Health Organization (1996) Water Quality Monitoring: A Practical Guide to the Design and Implementation of Freshwater Quality Studies and Monitoring Programmes.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Juma, N.G. (1998) The Pedosphere and Its Dynamics: A Systems Approach to Soil Science. Volume 1, Quality Color Press Incorperation, Edmonton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hughes, R.H. and Hughes, J.S. (1992) A Directory of African Wetlands. IUCN, Gland, Cambridge; UNEP, Nairobi; WCMC, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EPA (2001) Parameters of Water Quality: Interpretation and Standards. Environmental Protection Agency, Wexford.  
https://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/water/quality/Water_Quality.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">COWI (2010) Operationalisation of Catchment-Based Water Resources Management. Ministry of Water and Environment, Directorate of Water Resources Management, September 2010, Kampala Uganda.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Trivede, P., Bajpai, A. and Thareja, S. (2010) Comparative Study of Seasonal Variations in Physico-Chemical Characteristics in Drinking Water Quality of Kanpur, India With Reference to 200 MLD Filteration Plant and Groundwater. Natural Sciences, 8, 11-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bot, A. and Benites, J. (2005) The Importance of Soil Organic Matter Key to drought-Resistant Soil and Sustained Food and Production. FAO Soils Bulletin 80, FAO, Rome.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vega, M., Pardo, R., Barrado, E. and Debàn, L. (1998) Assessment of Seasonal and Polluting Effects on the Quality of River Water by Exploratory Data Analysis. Water Research, 32, 3581-3592.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gibb, A. (1984) A Review of the Hydrology of Lake Victoria and the Victoria Nile. Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford.  
http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/507639/1/N507639CR.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Twongo, T., Bugenyi, F.W.B. and Wanda, F. (1995) The Potential for Further Proliferation of Water Hyacinth in Lakes Victoria, Kyoga and Kwania and Some Urgent Aspects for Research. African Journal of Tropical Hydrobiology and Fisheries, 6, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vyas, V.G., Hassan, M.M., Vindhani, S.I., Parmar, H.J. and Bhalani, V.M. (2015) Physicochemical and Microbiological Assessment of Drinking Water from Different Sources in Junagadh City, India. American Journal of Microbiological Research, 3, 148-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kristensen, E., Ahmed, S.I. and Devol, A.H. (1995) Aerobic and Anaerobic Decomposition of Organic Matter in Marine Sediment: Which Is Fastest? Limnology and Oceanography, 40, 1430-1437. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1995.40.8.1430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lukubye, B. and Andama, M. (2017) Physico-Chemical Quality of Selected Drinking Water Sources in Mbarara Municipality, Uganda. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 9, 707-722. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2017.97047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wetzel, R.G. (2001) Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystem. 3rd Edition, Academic Press, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tenagne, A.W. (2009) The Impact of Urban Storm Water Runoff and Domestic Waste Effluent on Water Quality of Lake Tana and Local Groundwater near the City of Bahir Dar, Ethiopia. M.Sc. Thesis, Cornell University, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nriagu</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Toxic Metal Pollution in Africa</article-title><source> The Science of the Total Environment</source><volume> 121</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>37</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lavelle, P. and Spain, A.V. (2001) Soil Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5279-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.79738-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Breeuwsma, A. (1992) Phosphorus Fertilization and Environmental Effects in Neitherlands and Po Region, Italy. DLO the Winand Staring Centre, Wageningen.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>