<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">APM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Pure Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0368</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/apm.2017.74017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">APM-75599</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Hadamard Gaps and &lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;k&lt;/sub&gt;-type Spaces in the Unit Ball
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>A. Bakhit</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>A.</surname><given-names>E. Shammaky</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Jazan University, Jazan, KSA</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>04</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>306</fpage><lpage>313</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2017</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, we introduce a class of holomorphic Banach spaces 
  <em>N</em>
  <sub>K </sub>of functions on the unit ball B of C
  <sup>n</sup>. We develop the necessary and sufficient condition for 
  <em>N</em>
  <sub>K</sub>(
  B) spaces to be non-trivial and we discuss the nesting property of 
  <em style="white-space:normal;">N</em>
  <sub style="white-space:normal;">K</sub>
  (
  B) spaces. Also, we obtain some characterizations of functions with Hadamard gaps in 
  <em style="white-space:normal;">N</em>
  <sub style="white-space:normal;">K</sub>
  (
  B
  ) spaces. As a consequence, we prove a necessary and sufficient condition for that 
  <em style="white-space:normal;">N</em>
  <sub style="white-space:normal;">K</sub>
  (
  B
  )
   spaces coincides with the Beurling-type space.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;N&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sub&gt;k&lt;/sub&gt;-type Spaces</kwd><kwd> Beurling-Type Space</kwd><kwd> Hadamard Gaps</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Through this paper, B is the unit ball of the n-dimensional complex Euclidean space ℂ n , S is the boundary of B . We denote the class of all holomorphic functions, with the compact-open topology on the unit ball B by H ( B ) .</p><p>For any z = ( z 1 , z 2 , ⋯ , z n ) , w = ( w 1 , w 2 , ⋯ , w n ) ∈ ℂ n , the inner product is defined by 〈 z , w 〉 = ( z 1 w 1 &#175; , z 2 w 2 &#175; , ⋯ , z n w n &#175; ) , and write | z | = 〈 z , w 〉 .</p><p>Let d v be the Lebesgue volume measure on ℂ n , normalized so that v ( B ) ≡ 1 and d σ be the surface measure on S . Once again, we normalize σ so that σ ( B ) ≡ 1 . For z ∈ B and r &gt; 0 let B r = { z ∈ B : | z | ≤ r } .</p><p>For ζ ∈ B the measures v and σ are related by the following formula:</p><p>∫ B f d v = 2 n ∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 d r ∫ S f ( r ζ ) d σ ( ζ ) . (1)</p><p>The identity</p><p>∫ S f d σ = ∫ S d σ ( ζ ) 1 2π ∫ 0 2π f ( e i θ ζ ) d θ , (2)</p><p>is called integration by slices, for all 0 ≤ θ ≤ 2 π (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref1">1</xref>] ).</p><p>For every point a ∈ B the M&#246;bius transformation φ a : B → B is defined by</p><p>φ a ( z ) = a − P a ( z ) − S a Q a ( z ) 1 − 〈 z , a 〉 , (3)</p><p>where S a = 1 − | z | 2 , P a ( z ) = a 〈 z , a 〉 | a | 2 , P 0 = 0 and Q a = I − P a ( z ) (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref1">1</xref>] or [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref2">2</xref>] ).</p><p>The map φ a has the following properties that φ a ( 0 ) = a , φ a ( a ) = 0 , φ a = φ a − 1 and</p><p>1 − 〈 φ a ( z ) , φ a ( w ) 〉 = ( 1 − | a | 2 ) ( 1 − 〈 z , w 〉 ) ( 1 − 〈 z , a 〉 ) ( 1 − 〈 a , w 〉 ) ,</p><p>where z and w are arbitrary points in B . In particular,</p><p>1 − | φ a ( z ) | 2 = ( 1 − | a | 2 ) ( 1 − | z | 2 ) | 1 − 〈 z , a 〉 | 2 , (4)</p><p>For a ∈ B the M&#246;bius invariant Green function in the unit ball B denoted by G ( z , a ) = g ( φ a ( z ) ) where g ( z ) is defined by:</p><p>g ( z ) = n + 1 2 n ∫ | z | 1 ( 1 − t 2 ) n − 1 t 1 − 2 n d t . (5)</p><p>For n &gt; 1 , we have</p><p>1 C n ( 1 − r 2 ) n t − 2 ( n − 1 ) ≤ C n ( 1 − r 2 ) n t − 2 ( n − 1 ) , (6)</p><p>where C n is a constant depending on n only.</p><p>Let H ∞ ( B ) denote the Banach space of bounded functions in H ( B ) with the norm ‖ f ‖ ∞ = sup z ∈ B | f ( z ) | .</p><p>For α &gt; 0 , the Beurling-type space (sometimes also called the Bers-type space) H α ∞ ( B ) in the unit ball B consists of those functions f ∈ H ( B ) for which</p><p>‖ f ‖ H α ∞ ( B ) = sup z ∈ B | f ( z ) | ( 1 − | z | 2 ) α &lt; ∞ . (7)</p><p>Let K : ( 0 , ∞ ) → [ 0 , ∞ ) is a right-continuous, non-decreasing function and is not equal to zero identically. The N K ( B ) space consists of all functions f ∈ H ( B ) such that</p><p>‖ f ‖ K 2 = sup z ∈ B ∫ B | f ( z ) | 2 K ( G ( z , a ) ) d v ( z ) &lt; ∞ . (8)</p><p>Clearly, if K ( t ) = t p , then N K ( B ) = N p ( B ) . For K ( t ) = 1 it gives the Bergman space A 2 ( B ) . If N K ( B ) consists of just the constant functions, we say that it is trivial.</p><p>We assume from now that all K : ( 0 , ∞ ) → [ 0 , ∞ ) to appear in this paper are right-continuous and nondecreasing function, which is not equal to 0 identically.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref3">3</xref>] , several basic properties of N K ( B ) are proved, in connection with the Beurling-type space H α ∞ ( B ) . In particular, an embedding theorem for N K ( B ) and H α ∞ ( B ) is obtained, together with other useful properties. Hadamard gaps series and Hadamard product on N K spaces of holomorphic function in the case of the unit disk has been studied quite well in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref4">4</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Through this, paper, given two quantities A f and B f both depending on a function f ∈ H ( B ) , we are going to write A f ≲ B f if there exists a constant C &gt; 0 , independent of f , such that A f ≤ C B f for all f . When A f ≲ B f ≲ A f , we write A f ≈ B f . If the quantities A f and B f are equivalent, then in particular we have A f &lt; ∞ if and only if B f &lt; ∞ . As usual, the letter C will denote a positive constant, possibly different on each occurrence.</p><p>In this paper, we introduce N K ( B ) spaces, in terms of the right continuous and non-decreasing function K : ( 0 , ∞ ) → [ 0 , ∞ ) on the unit ball B . We discuss the nesting property of N K ( B ) . We prove a sufficient condition for</p><p>N K ( B ) = H α ∞ ( B ) , α = n + 1 2 (the Beurling-type space). Also we generalize</p><p>the necessary condetion to N K ( B ) for a kind of lacunary series. As aplplication, we show that the sufficient condition is also a necessary to N K ( B ) = H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. 𝓝<sub>K</sub> Spaces in the Unit Ball</title><p>In this section we prove some basic Banach space properties of N K ( B ) space. A sufficient and necessary condition for N K ( B ) to be non-trivial is given. We discuss the nesting property of N K ( B ) spaces and prove a sufficient condition for N K ( B ) = H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) .</p><p>Lemma 2.1</p><p>Let f ( z ) = ∑ k = 1 ∞ a k z k be a non-constant function, where k = ( k 1 , k 2 , ⋯ , k n ) is an n-tuple of non-negative integers and z k = ( z 1 k 1 , z 2 k 2 , ⋯ , z n k n ) .</p><p>Then, z k ∈ N K ( B ) if a k ≠ 0 .</p><p>Proof:</p><p>Let k be such that Let k be such that a k ≠ 0 and let F k ( z ) = a k z k . Suppose that</p><p>U θ f ( z ) = f ( z 1 e i θ 1 , z 2 e i θ 2 , ⋯ , z n e i θ n ) = f ∘ U θ ( z ) ,</p><p>where U θ ( z ) = ( z 1 e i θ 1 , z 2 e i θ 2 , ⋯ , z n e i θ n ) . Then, we have</p><p>F k ( z ) = 1 ( 2 π ) n ∫ 0 2π ⋯ ∫ 0 2π f ( z 1 e i θ 1 , ⋯ , z n e i θ n ) e − i k 1 θ 1 ⋯ e − i k n θ n d θ n = 1 ( 2 π ) n ∫ 0 2π ⋯ ∫ 0 2π ( U θ f ) ( z ) e − i k 1 θ 1 ⋯ e − i k n θ n d θ n . (9)</p><p>By Jensen’s inequality on convexity,</p><p>| F k ( z ) | 2 ≤ 1 ( 2 π ) 2 n ∫ 0 2π ⋯ ∫ 0 2π | U θ f ( z ) | 2 d θ 1 ⋯ d θ n . (10)</p><p>Consequently,</p><p>∫ B | F k ( z ) | 2 K ( G ( z , a ) ) d λ ( z ) ≤ ‖ U θ f ‖ K 2 1 ( 2 π ) 2 n ∫ 0 2π ⋯ ∫ 0 2π d θ 1 ⋯ d θ n ≤ ‖ U θ f ‖ K 2 . (11)</p><p>Because U θ ( z ) ∈ A u t ( B ) we have ‖ U θ f ‖ K = ‖ f ‖ K . Therefore,</p><p>‖ F k f ‖ K = ‖ a k z k ‖ K ≤ ‖ f ‖ K</p><p>and z k ∈ N K ( B ) . The lemma is proved.</p><p>Theorem 2.1 The Holomorphic function spaces N K ( B ) , contains all polynomials if</p><p>∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r &lt; ∞ . (12)</p><p>Otherwise, N K ( B ) contains only constant functions.</p><p>Proof:</p><p>First assume that (12) holds. Let f ( z ) be a polynomial i.e. (there exists a M &gt; 0 such that | f ( z ) | 2 ≤ M , ∀ z ∈ B &#175; = B ∪ S ). Then,</p><p>∫ B | f ( z ) | 2 K ( G ( z , a ) ) d v ( z ) = 2 n ∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r ∫ S | f ( ϕ a ( r ζ ) ) | 2 d σ ( ζ ) ≤ 2 n M ∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r . (13)</p><p>Since a is arbitrary, it follows that</p><p>‖ f ‖ K 2 ≤ 2 n M ∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r &lt; ∞ . (14)</p><p>Thus, f ∈ N K ( B ) and the first half of the theorem is proved.</p><p>Now, we assume that the integral in (12) is divergent. Let α = ( α 1 , α 2 , ⋯ , α n ) is an n-tuple of non-negative integers | α | = α 1 + α 2 + ⋯ + α n ≥ 1 , f ( z ) = z α .</p><p>Then, we have | f ( r ξ ) | 2 = r 2 | α | | ξ α | 2 and</p><p>∫ S | ( r ζ ) α | 2 d σ ( r ζ ) ≥ r 2 | α | ( n − 1 ) ! α ! ( n − 1 + | α | ) ! ≥ C r 2 | α | . (15)</p><p>Thus,</p><p>‖ f ‖ K ≥ n C 2 2 | α | − 1 ∫ 1 / 2 1 r 2 n − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r . (16)</p><p>There exists a ∈ B such that f ( a ) ≠ 0 , by the subharmonicity of | f ∘ φ a ( r ξ ) | ,</p><p>‖ f ‖ K ≥ 3 n 2 | f ( a ) | 2 ∫ 0 1 / 2 r 2 n − 1 ( 1 − r 2 ) n + 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r . (17)</p><p>Combining (17) and (18), we see that (12) implies that ‖ f ‖ K = ∞ .</p><p>It is proved that f ∉ N K ( B ) and, since α is arbitrary, any non-constant polynomial is not contained in N K ( B ) . Using Lemma 2.1, we conclude that N K ( B ) contains only constant functions. The theorem is proved.</p><p>Theorem 2.2</p><p>Let K 1 and K 2 satisfy (12). If there exist a constant t 0 &gt; 0 such that K 2 ( t ) ≲ K 1 ( t ) for t ∈ ( 0 , t 0 ) , then N K 1 ( B ) ⊆ N K 2 ( B ) . As a consequence, N K 1 ( B ) = N K 2 ( B ) . if K 2 ( t ) ≈ K 1 ( t ) for t ∈ ( 0 , t 0 ) .</p><p>Proof: Let f ∈ N K 1 ( B ) . We note that from the property of g ( z ) , there exists a constant δ &gt; 0 , such that g ( z ) &lt; t 0 if | z | &gt; δ . Then, we have</p><p>∫ B | f ( z ) | 2 K 2 ( G ( z , a ) ) d v ( z ) = ∫ B δ + ∫ | z | ≥ δ | f ( ϕ a ( z ) ) | 2 K 2 ( g ( z ) ) d v ( z ) (18)</p><p>where</p><p>∫ B δ | f ( ϕ a ( z ) ) | 2 K 2 ( g ( z ) ) d v ( z ) ≤ ‖ f ‖ ∞ 2 ∫ B δ ( 1 − | z | 2 ) − n K 2 ( g ( z ) ) d v ( z ) ≤ 2 n ‖ f ‖ ∞ 2 ∫ 0 δ r 2 n − 1 K 2 ( g ( r ) ) d r &lt; ∞ ,</p><p>and</p><p>∫ | z | ≥ δ | f ( ϕ a ( z ) ) | 2 K 2 ( g ( z ) ) d v ( z ) ≤ ∫ | z | ≥ δ | f ( ϕ a ( z ) ) | 2 K 1 ( g ( z ) ) d v ( z ) ≤ ‖ f ‖ K 1 2 &lt; ∞ .</p><p>This show that ‖ f ‖ K 2 &lt; ∞ and, consequently, f ∈ N K 2 ( B ) .</p><p>Theorem 2.3</p><p>Let K : ( 0 , ∞ ) → [ 0 , ∞ ) be nondecreasing function, then N K ( B ) ⊂ H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) .</p><p>Proof: The theorem proved in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Theorem 2.4</p><p>N K ( B ) = H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) if</p><p>∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 ( 1 − r 2 ) n + 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r &lt; ∞ . (19)</p><p>Proof: Let f ∈ H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) . Then,</p><p>∫ B | f ( z ) | 2 K ( G ( z , a ) ) d v ( z ) ≤ ‖ f ‖ H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) 2 ∫ B ( 1 − | z | 2 ) − n K ( g ( z ) ) d v ( z ) ( 1 − | z | 2 ) n + 1 ≤ 2 n ‖ f ‖ H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) 2 ∫ 0 1 r 2 n − 1 ( 1 − r 2 ) n + 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r . (20)</p><p>Thus, ‖ f ‖ K &lt; ∞ and f ∈ N K ( B ) . This shows that H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) ⊂ N K ( B ) . By Theorem 2.3, we have N K ( B ) ⊂ H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) . The proof of theorem is complete.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Hadamard Gaps in 𝓝<sub>K</sub> Spaces in the Unit Ball</title><p>In this section we prove a necessary condition for a lacunary series defined by a normal sequence to belong to N K ( B ) space. As an implication of Theorem</p><p>2.4, we prove that (19) is also necessary for N K ( B ) = H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) .</p><p>Recall that an f ∈ H ( B ) written in the form f ( z ) = ∑ k = 0 ∞ P n k ( z ) where</p><p>P n k is a homogeneous polynomial of degree n k , is said to have Hadamard gaps (also known as lacunary series) if there exists a constant c &gt; 1 such that (see e.g. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref6">6</xref>] )</p><p>n k + 1 n k ≥ c ,   ∀ k ≥ 0. (21)</p><p>Let Λ n ⊂ S for n = n 0 , n 0 + 1 , ⋯ . The sequence of homogeneous polynomials</p><p>P n ( z ) = ∑ ζ ∈ Λ n 〈 z , ζ 〉 n , (22)</p><p>is called a normal sequence if it possesses the following property (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.75599-ref7">7</xref>] ):</p><p>・ | P n ( z ) | ≤ C | z | n for z ∈ B ;</p><p>・ ∑ ξ , ζ ∈ Λ n ξ , ζ n ≥ n k + 1 C .</p><p>In what following, we will consider all lacunary series defined by normal sequences of homogeneous polynomials. To formulate our main result, we denote</p><p>L j = ∫ S | P n j ( ζ ) | 2 d σ ( ζ ) . (23)</p><p>Theorem 3.1</p><p>Let P n ( z ) be a normal sequence and let I K = { n ∈ ℕ : 2 k ≤ n ≤ 2 k + 1 } . Then a</p><p>lacunary series f ( z ) = ∑ k = 0 ∞ P n k ( z ) , belongs to N K ( B ) if</p><p>∑ k = 0 ∞ n k m 2 k K ( n k − m ) ∑ n j ∈ I k L j &lt; ∞ . (24)</p><p>Proof: Let f ∈ N K ( B ) . Then, we have</p><p>∫ B | f ( z ) | 2 K ( G ( z , a ) ) d v ( z ) ≥ ∫ B | ∑ k = 0 ∞ P n k ( z ) | 2 K ( g ( | z | ) ) d v ( z ) ≥ ∑ k = 0 ∞ n k 2 k ∑ n j ∈ I k L j ∫ 0 1 r 2 m − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r , (25)</p><p>where</p><p>| ∑ k = 0 ∞ P n k ( z ) | 2 = ∑ k = 0 ∞ 1 2 k ∑ n j ∈ I k | P n k ( ζ ) | 2 . (26)</p><p>By (6) for 1 2 ≤ r ≤ 1 , we have</p><p>K ( g ( r ) ) ≥ K ( c − 1 ( 1 − r ) m ) . (27)</p><p>Consequently,</p><p>∫ 0 1 r 2 m − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r ≥ ∫ 1 2 1 r 2 m − 1 K ( c − 1 ( 1 − r ) m ) d r ≥ ∫ 0 log 2 e − 2 m t K ( c 1 − 1 t m ) d t ≥ K ( n k − m ) ∫ c 1 n k − 1 log 2 e − 2 m t d t ≥ n k m − 1 K ( n k − m ) ∫ c 1 n k log 2 e − 2 t d t . (28)</p><p>Let k ′ be sufficiently large such that n k ′ log 2 ≥ c 1 + 1 . Then, for k ≥ k ′ ,</p><p>∫ 0 1 r 2 m − 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r ≥ n k m − 1 K ( n k − m ) . (29)</p><p>And</p><p>∫ B | f ( z ) | 2 K ( G ( z , a ) ) d v ( z ) ≥ C ∑ k = k ′ ∞ n k m 2 k K ( n k − m ) ∑ n j ∈ I k L j . (30)</p><p>This shows (24) and the theorem is proved.</p><p>Theorem 3.2</p><p>N K ( B ) = H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) if and only if (18) holds.</p><p>Proof: The sufficient condition was proved by Theorem 2.4. Now we prove the necessary condition, assume that N K ( B ) = H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) . Among lacunary series defined by normal sequences, we consider</p><p>f ( z ) = ∑ k = k 0 ∞ P 2 k ( z ) , (31)</p><p>where P 2 k = ∑ ζ ∈ Λ n 〈 z , ζ 〉 2 k and | P 2 k | = C | z | 2 k for k ≥ k 0 , 2 k 0 ≥ n 0 and z ∈ B .</p><p>Thus</p><p>| f ( z ) | ( 1 − | z | 2 ) n + 1 ≤ ( 1 − | z | 2 ) n + 1 ∑ k = k 0 ∞ | P 2 k ( z ) | ≤ C ∑ n = 1 ∞ | z | n ≤ C . (32)</p><p>This shows that f ∈ H n + 1 2 ∞ ( B ) and, consequently, f ∈ N K ( B ) . By Theorem</p><p>3.1, we have</p><p>∑ k = 1 ∞ 2 k ( m − 1 ) K ( 2 − m k ) &lt; ∞ . (33)</p><p>By (6), we have</p><p>∫ 1 / 2 1 r 2 m − 1 ( 1 − r 2 ) m + 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r ≤ ∫ 0 c 1 / m log 2 t − m − 1 K ( t m ) d t . (34)</p><p>On the other hand,</p><p>∫ 0 1 / 2 t − m − 1 K ( t m ) d t = ∑ k = 1 ∞ ∫ 2 − k − 1 2 − k t − m − 1 K ( t m ) d t = ∑ k = 1 ∞ 2 − ( k + 1 ) 2 − m − 1 K ( 2 − m k ) , (35)</p><p>since K is non-decreasing. Thus,</p><p>∫ 1 / 2 1 r 2 m − 1 ( 1 − r 2 ) m + 1 K ( g ( r ) ) d r &lt; ∞ . (36)</p><p>Combining this, we obtain (18). The theorem is proved.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Our aim of the present paper is to characterize the holomorphic functions with Hadamard gaps in N K -type spaces on the unit ball, where K is the right continuous and non-decreasing function. Our main results will be of important uses in the study of operator theory of holomorphic function spaces.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are thankful to the referee for his/her valuable comments and very useful suggestions.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Bakhit, M.A. and Shammaky, A.E. (2017) Hadamard Gaps and 𝓝<sub>K</sub>-type Spaces in the Unit Ball. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 7, 306-313. https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2017.74017</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.75599-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, K. (2004) Spaces of Holomorphic Functions in the Unit Ball. Springer-Verlag, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75599-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rudin, W. (1980) Function Theory in the Unit Ball of C^n. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8098-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75599-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shammaky, A.E. and Bakhit, M.A. (2016) Properties of Weighted Composition Operators on Some Weighted Holomorphic Function Classes in the Unit Ball. International Journal of Analysis and Applications, 12, 87-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75599-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Sayed Ahmed, A. and Bakhit, M.A. (2009) Holomorphic N&lt;sub&gt;k&lt;/sub&gt; and Bergman-Type Spaces, Part of the Operator Theory: Advances and Applications Book Series. Birkh&amp;auml;user Verlag, Basel-Switzerland, 121-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75599-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Sayed Ahmed, A. and Bakhit, M.A. (2010) Hadamard Products and N_K Spaces. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 51, 33-43.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75599-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choa, J. (1996) Some Properties of Analytic Functions on the Unit Ball with Hadamard Gaps. Complex Variables Theory Appl, 29, 277-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476939608814895</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.75599-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H. and Xu, W. (2010) Lacunary Series and Q_K Spaces on the Unit Ball. Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae Mathematica, 35, 47-57.https://doi.org/10.5186/aasfm.2010.3503</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>