<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2017.52031</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-74154</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Equivalence between Modulus of Smoothness and K-Functional on Rotation Group SO(3)*
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhuyuan</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zongwen</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Mathematics and computer Science, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Yunnan University, Kunming, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>341</fpage><lpage>345</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2017</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>12,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper we obtain the equivalence between modulus of smoothness and K-functional on rotation group SO(3).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Rotation Group</kwd><kwd> Modulus of Smoothness</kwd><kwd> K-Functional</kwd><kwd> Equivalence</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Many results of approximation are based on Euclid spaces or their compact subsets. Periodic approximation is based on compact group {exp(ix)}, whereas matrix group U(n) is the generalization of {exp(ix)}. We know homomorphism between SU(2) and rotation group SO(3), which has many applications in Physics and Chemistry. Some approximation problems on compact groups have been studied since in 1920s F. Peter and H. Weyl proved the approximation theorem on compact group, that is, the irreducible character generate a dense subspace of the space of continuous classes function. For instance, Gongsheng (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref1">1</xref>]) studied the basic problems of Fourier analysis on unitary and rotation groups, including the degree of convergence of Abel sum based on Poisson kernel. Xue-an Zheng (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref3">3</xref>]) studied the polynomial approximation on compact Lie groups. D. I. Cartwright et al. studied Jackson’s theorem for compact connected Lie groups (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref4">4</xref>]), and so on. In this paper, we study the modulus of smoothness and K-functional on rotation group SO(3) and as classical casein Euclid space we will obtain the equivalence between them.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x3.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the rotation group, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the group of invertible real (n &#215; n) matrices. For 1 ≤ p &lt; +∞, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where μ is the normalized Harr measure on G. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the Lie algebra of G = SO(3), i = 1, 2, 3, Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i = 1, 2, 3, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the r-order derivative of g in direction<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We also write the difference of function f and modulus of smoothness in the direction D<sub>i</sub> as follows</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula409"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the norm induced by Killing inner product on g.</p><p>We denote</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Accordingly, we denote K-functional as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula410"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula411"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further, for the isotropic case.</p><p>Let multi-indice<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the unit vector in the i-th direction. Define</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The corresponding K-functional is defined by</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In the next paragraph we denote by C or C<sub>i</sub> the positive constants but are not the same in the different formula. And <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> means there exist two positive constants C<sub>1</sub>, C<sub>2</sub> satisfying C<sub>1</sub>A ≤ B ≤ C<sub>2</sub>A.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Theorems and Their Proofs</title><p>We will use the next lemma 1.</p><p>Lemma 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref6">6</xref>]. If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where N<sub>r</sub> denotes the normalized B-spline of order r (degree r-1).</p><p>Theorem 1. If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. For i = 1, 2, 3, we first construct the approximation operators as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula412"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By Lemma 1,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Obviously, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a bounded operator from L<sub>p</sub> to L<sub>p</sub>(<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p><p>If we differentiate r times, then</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>So,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula413"><label>. (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Clearly,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We get</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Conversely, for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, using (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.74154-ref7">7</xref>])</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula414"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Theorem 2. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof. Noting that for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>we get</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Writing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and using the last inequality will give</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Moreover, we construct the approximation operator as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula415"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It easy to see that by using the boundedness of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i = 1, 2, 3.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.74154-formula416"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is similarly to (1), we have</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Thus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/74154x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Remark: Theorem 1 and theorem 2 can be easily generalized to SO(n) (n &gt; 3).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yang, Z.Y. and Yang, Z.W. (2017) Equivalence between Modulus of Smoothness and K-Functional on Rotation Group SO(3). Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 5, 341-345. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2017.52031</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.74154-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gong, S. (1983) Harmonic Analysis on Classical Groups. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74154-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, X.-A., Xu, Z.F. and Zhao, H.S. (987) Approximation by Polynomial on Compact Lie Groups(I). Advance in Mathematics, 16, 61-66. (In Chi-nese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74154-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, X.-A., Zhao, H.S. and Xu, Z.F. (1990) Polynomial Approximation on Compact Lie Groups in the Lp Norm(II). Advance in Mathematics, 19, 199-203. (In Chinese).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74154-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cartwright, D.I. and Kucharski, K. (1988) Jackson’s Theorem for Compact Connected Lie Groups. Journal of Approximation Theory, 55, 352-359.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9045(88)90102-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74154-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schumarker, L.L. (1981) Spline Functions: Basic Theory. A Wi-ley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74154-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahmen, W., De Vore, R. and Scherer, K. (1980) Multi-Dimensional Spline Approximation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 17, 380-402.  
https://doi.org/10.1137/0717033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.74154-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaudry, G.I. and Pini, R. (1986) Bernstein Theorem for Compact, Connected Lie Groups. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 99, 297- 305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100064215</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>