<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2016.411205</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-72168</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Integro-Differential Equations for a Jump-Diffusion Risk Process with Dependence between Claim Sizes and Claim Intervals
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Heli</surname><given-names>Gao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Binzhou University, Binzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>2061</fpage><lpage>2068</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>30,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>19,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>November</day>	<month>22,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The classical Poisson risk model in ruin theory assumed that the interarrival times between two successive claims are mutually independent, and the claim sizes and claim intervals are also mutually independent. In this paper, we modify the classical Poisson risk model to describe the surplus process of an insurance portfolio. We consider a jump-diffusion risk process compounded by a geometric Brownian motion, and assume that the claim sizes and claim intervals are dependent. Using the properties of conditional expectation, we establish integro-differential equations for the Gerber-Shiu function and the ultimate ruin probability.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Jump-Diffusion Risk Process</kwd><kwd> Diffusion</kwd><kwd> Geometric Brownian Motion</kwd><kwd> Gerber-Shiu Function</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Various papers in ruin theory modify the classical Poisson risk model to describe the surplus process of an insurance portfolio. An extension of the classical model is that the risk process perturbed by a diffusion was first introduced by Gerber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref1">1</xref>] and has been further studied by many authors during the last few years, e.g. Dufresne and Gerber [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref2">2</xref>] , Gerber and Landry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref3">3</xref>] , Wang and Wu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref4">4</xref>] , Tsai and Willmot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref6">6</xref>] , Chiu and Yin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref7">7</xref>] , and the references therein.</p><p>In the risk process that is perturbed by diffusion, the surplus process <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of an insurance portfolio is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula77"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the initial surplus, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the positive constant premium income</p><p>rate, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the aggregate claims process, in which</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula78"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the claim number process (denoting the number of claims up to time t), and the interarrival times <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a sequence of positive random variables. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a sequence of nonnegative independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) random variables with distribution function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and density function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a standard Brownian motion that is independent of the aggregate claims process<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a positive constant.</p><p>It is explicitly assumed in these papers that the interarrival times <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the claim sizes <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are mutually independent. However, this assumption is often too restrictive in practice, and there is a need for more general models where the independence assumptions can be relaxed. Recently, various results have been obtained concerning the asymptotic behavior of the probability of ruin for dependent claims, see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref14">14</xref>] , as well as the references therein. Zhao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref14">14</xref>] assumed that the distribution of the time between two claim occurrences depends on the previous claim size. Motivated by the results of Zhao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref14">14</xref>] , the main aim of this paper is to modify the risk model (Equation (1)), and establish integro-differential equations for the Gerber-Shiu function and the ultimate ruin probability in the new risk model.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Improved Risk Model</title><p>In this paper, it is assumed that the claim occurrence process to be of the following type: If a claim <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is larger than a random variable<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the time until the next claim <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is exponentially distributed with rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, otherwise it is exponentially distributed with rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The quantities <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are assumed to be i.i.d. random variables with distribution function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Assuming that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>which is the net profit condition.</p><p>In the daily operation of insurance company, in addition to the premium income and claim to the operation of spending has a great influence on the outside, and there is also a factor that interest rates should not be neglected. As in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.72168-ref15">15</xref>] , this paper assume that the risk model Equation (1) is invested in a stochastic interest process which is assumed to be a geometric Brownian motion<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where r and σ<sub>2</sub> are positive constants, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a standard Brownian motion independent of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the surplus of the insurer at time t under this investment assumption. Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula79"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Denote T to be the ruin time (the first time that the surplus becomes negative), i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula80"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>This article is interested in the expected discounted penalty (Gerber-Shiu) function:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula81"><label>, (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the indicator function, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the force of interest and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a nonnegative function of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and satisfies<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Furthermore, let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the time when the first claim occurs, and random variable <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> being exponentially distributed with rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Assuming that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula82"><label>, (4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula83"><label>, (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Integro-Differential Equations for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title><p>In this section, a system of integro-differential equations with initial value conditions satisfied by the Gerber-Shiu function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is derived.</p><p>Define<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula84"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 3.1 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> define the hitting time<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it can be concluded that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula85"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a reflecting diffusion with generator</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>acting on functions satisfying the reflecting boundary condition<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>If</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula86"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for t &gt; 0, then, according to It&#244;’s formula <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a local mar-</p><p>tingale. Using the separation variable technique, we find that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula87"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is a solution, where</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a solution of</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Here</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Using the initial condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, consequently</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Applying the Optional Stopping Theorem, it follows that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and thus</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>This ends the proof of Lemma 3.1.</p><p>Similarly, the following lemma can also be obtained.</p><p>Lemma 3.2 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> define the hitting time<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it can be concluded that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula88"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 3.1 Assuming that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is second order continuously differentiable functions in u, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the following integro-differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula89"><label>, (9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula90"><label>, (10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the initial value conditions</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Proof Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the time when the first claim occurs which exponentially distributed with rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Consider the risk process <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by Equation (2) in an infinitesimal time interval<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. There are three possible cases in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as follows.</p><p>1) There are no claims in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with probability<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, thus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>2) There is exactly one claim in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with probability<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. According to different of the claim amount, there are three possible cases in this case as follows.</p><p>a) The amount of the claim<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., ruin does not occur, and thus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>;</p><p>b) The amount of the claim<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., ruin occurs due to the claim;</p><p>c) The amount of the claim<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., ruin occurs due to oscillation (observe that the probability that this case occurs is zero).</p><p>3) There is more than one claim in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with probability<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Thus, considering the three cases above and noting that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a strong Markov process, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula91"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By Taylor expansion, we have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, thus Equation (11) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula92"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then, by It&#244;’s formula we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula93"><label>. (13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore, by dividing t on both sides of Equation (12), letting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, using Equation (13), we obtain Equation (9), and similarly we can obtain Equation (10).</p><p>The condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follows from the oscillating nature of the sample paths of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Now, we prove<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>For all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, by the strong property of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it can be concluded that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula94"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to Lemma 3.1, it can be concluded that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula95"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and correspondingly<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Similar results can be derived for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>And for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, according to Lemma 3.2 we obtain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, thus<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>This ends the proof of Theorem 3.1.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Differential Equations for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></title><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in Equation (3), correspondingly the expected discounted penalty function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> turns into the ultimate ruin probability<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Obviously,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Suppose that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is exponentially distributed with rate<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, we get the following theorem.</p><p>Theorem 4.1 Assuming that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is second order continuously differentiable functions in u, then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the following integro-differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula96"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula97"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with the initial value conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula98"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x142.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof According to Equation (9), it can be concluded that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.72168-formula99"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720732x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By taking the derivative with respect to u on both sides of the above formula, and after some careful calculations, we obtain Equation (14). And similarly we can prove that Equation (15) holds. This ends the proof of Theorem 4.1.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we consider a jump-diffusion risk process compounded by a geometric Brownian motion with dependence between claim sizes and claim intervals. We derive the integro-differential equations for the Gerber-Shiu functions and the ultimate ruin probability by using the martingale measure. Further studies are needed for the numerical solution of Equations (9), (10), (14) and (15). The results derived in this paper can be generalized to similar dependence ruin models.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11601036), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong (No. ZR2014GQ005) and the Natural Science Foundation of Binzhou University (No. 2016Y14).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Gao, H.L. (2016) Integro-Differential Equations for a Jump- Diffusion Risk Process with Dependence between Claim Sizes and Claim Intervals. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 4, 2061-2068. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2016.411205</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.72168-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gerber</surname><given-names> H.U. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1970</year>)<article-title>An Extension of the Renewal Equation and Its Application in the Collective Theory of Risk</article-title><source> Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift</source><volume> 1970</volume>,<fpage> 205</fpage>-<lpage>210</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dufresne, F. and Gerber, H.U. (1991) Risk Theory for the Compound Poisson Process That Is Perturbed by Diffusion. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 10, 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6687(91)90023-Q</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gerber, H.U. and Landry, B. (1998) On the Discounted Penalty at Ruin in a Jump-Diffusion and the Perpetual Put Option. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 22, 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6687(98)00014-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, G. and Wu, R. (2000) Some Distributions for the Classical Risk Process That Is Perturbed by Diffusion. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 26, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/253675</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsai, C.C.L. and Willmot, G.E. (2002) A Generalized Defective Renewal Equation for the Surplus Process Perturbed by Diffusion. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 30, 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6687(01)00096-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tsai, C.C.L. and Willmot, G.E. (2002) On the Moments of the Surplus Process Perturbed by Diffusion. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31, 327-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6687(02)00159-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chiu, S.N. and Yin, C.C. (2003) The Time of Ruin, the Surplus Prior to Ruin and the Deficit at Ruin for the Classical Risk Process Perturbed by Diffusion. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33, 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6687(03)00143-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boudreault, M., Cossette, H., Landriault, D. and Marceau, E. (2006) On a Risk Model with Dependence between Interclaim Arrivals and Claim Sizes. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 5, 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03461230600992266</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bargès, M., Cossette, H., Loisel, S. and Marceau, E. (2011) On the Moments of the Aggregate Discounted Claims with Dependence Introduced by a FGM Copula. ASTIN Bulletin, 41, 215-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J. (2012) Asymptotics in a Time-Dependent Renewal Risk Model with Stochastic Return. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 387, 1009-1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.10.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yong, W. and Xiang, H. (2012) Differential Equations for Ruin Probability in a Special Risk Model with FGM Copula for the Claim Size and the Inter-Claim Time. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2012, 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2012-156</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, K.A. and Ng, C.Y.A. (2014) Asymptotics for the Ruin Probability of a Time-Dependent Renewal Risk Model with Geometric Lévy Process Investment Returns and Dominatedly-Varying-Tailed Claims. Insurance Mathematics &amp; Economics, 56, 80-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J. and Xiao, Q. (2015 ) Optimal Investment of a Time-Dependent Renewal Risk Model with Stochastic Return. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2015,181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13660-015-0707-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, X.H. and Yin, C.C. (2009) A Jump-Diffusion Risk Model with Dependence between Claim Sizes and Claim Intervals. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 29A, 1657-1664.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.72168-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, J. and Xu, C. (2005) On the Decomposition of the Ruin Probability for a Jump-Diffusion Surplus Process Compounded by a Geometric Brownian Motion. North American Actuarial Journal, 10, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2006.10596255</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>