<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ENG</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1947-3931</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/eng.2016.89053</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ENG-70347</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On the Bump Tests of Cracked Shafts Using Acoustic Emission Techniques
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gilberto</surname><given-names>Luiz S. Pimentel-Junior</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Frederico</surname><given-names>B. Oliveira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marco</surname><given-names>Tulio C. Faria</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>572</fpage><lpage>581</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>July</day>	<month>7,</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>Accepted:</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>29,</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>September</day>	<month>2,</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  An investigation about the application of Acoustic Emission (AE) techniques to analyze the dynamic response of different cracked shafts rendered in bump tests is presented in this work. The experimental apparatus devised for this work complies of six shafts with different transverse crack sizes and a high-frequency data acquisition system. The AE signals generated in the bump tests performed on the different cracked shafts are captured by a wideband AE transducer. Those signals are treated by using statistical moments, wavelet transforms, and frequency- and time-domain procedures. A transverse crack of predetermined depth is etched into each shaft. The experimental results show that the values of kurtosis and skewness estimated for the AE signals can be used to identify the crack size.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Acoustic Emission</kwd><kwd> Cracked Rotors</kwd><kwd> Bump Tests</kwd><kwd> Shaft Crack</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Acoustic Emission (AE) is well known as a very efficient non-destructive technique for analysis, monitoring, and diagnosis of mechanical component failures. Elastic waves associated with defects or cracks on components subjected to steady-state or varying loads can propagate through the medium and be captured by AE sensors. The great sensitivity to crack detection may be considered as one of the main advantages of AE analysis. Only in the recent years, some AE analyses have been developed for rotating machinery failure diagnosis and bearing failure detection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref5">5</xref>] presents an experimental investigation about the influence of operating parameters on the AE levels for rotating systems supported by hydrodynamic bearings. One of their conclusions is that the viscous friction associated with the hydrodynamic bearings is one of the main sources of AE signals for rotors supported on fluid-film bearings.</p><p>Most of the recent works on the application of AE techniques in rotating systems is concerned with rotors supported by rolling bearings. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref6">6</xref>] shows that AE signals can be employed to detect failure at very early stages on rolling bearings. In their work, the AE signal level is compared with AE threshold levels associated with bearing failures. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref7">7</xref>] presents a study about the applicability of AE techniques on the detection and location of failures in ball bearings. Their experimental apparatus permits the application of very high loads on the rotating shaft in order to speed up the bearing surface degradation. They use spectral analysis on the AE time signals to evaluate and estimate efficiently the bearing crack initiation, propagation, and location.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref8">8</xref>] devises a rotor-bearing test rig to study the AE signals associated with rolling bearing defects. The bearing defects are etched by means of electrical erosion techniques. They conclude that the AE signal amplitude varies substantially when the defect size reaches a minimum value. They also state that plastic deformation and crack growth are the main sources of AE signals in their study.</p><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref9">9</xref>] combines vibration analysis with AE techniques to investigate experimentally the AE signal features of rolling bearing defects. They show that there is a relationship between the AE signal amplitude and the bearing defect size, stating that the main source of AE signal in rolling bearings are the contact surface defects on the bearing races. They show that the AE technique based on two statistics, root mean square (RMS) value and kurtosis, can predict more accurately the bearing failures than the vibration techniques can.</p><p>Practically, the vast technical literature on the application of AE techniques in rotor dynamics is directed to analysis and detection of bearing failure. This paper deals with an experimental investigation about the AE analysis of cracked shafts. Six shafts with different transverse crack sizes are specially manufactured using commercial steel AISI 1020 for this work. The AE signals are captured during bump tests performed on all shafts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref10">10</xref>] . The data acquisition system employs a wideband AE sensor (20 kHz - 1 MHz) with a sampling rate of 0.4 MHz. The AE data are evaluated by using wavelets and the AE time responses rendered from the six cracked shafts are evaluated statistically. The statistics associated with the third and fourth moments, kurtosis and skewness, are used to extract some patterns of the AE signals in time. The preliminary results indicate that the shaft discontinuity has an influence on the AE signal levels.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Statistical Analysis</title><p>A brief review of the statistical moments is presented to enlarge the understanding about their importance on the AE signal analysis.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Skewness</title><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref11">11</xref>] shows that the third-order statistical moment can be used to estimate the value of skewness of a probability distribution, which can provide an idea about the number and frequency of impulses on the AE signal distribution. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref12">12</xref>] shows that the noise associated with impact can be separated from the random noise by using the value of skewness. The skewness value is a good indicator for the signal distribution asymmetry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref13">13</xref>] . That means that for symmetrical distributions, the skewness tend to be zero.</p><p>Skewness is a measure of the probability distribution asymmetry in relation to the average. Statistical distributions with data concentrated at one side from the mean value have large values of skewness. Negatively skewed distributions are not common in most engineering problems.</p><p>Skewness, S, can be expressed by Equation (1), in which <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x2.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and M<sub>3</sub> are the second and third statistical moments, respectively.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70347-formula104"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The second statistical moment <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is related to the standard deviation, σ, as shown by Equation (2). The number of elements in a sample is given by n. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>represents an individual value and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> represents the mean value of a sample.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70347-formula105"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The third statistical moment <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is expressed by Equation (3).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70347-formula106"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting Equation (2) and Equation (3) into Equation (1), the following expression is obtained for the skewness.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70347-formula107"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Kurtosis</title><p>Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref14">14</xref>] uses the value of kurtosis in the study of failure detection in rolling bearings used in electrical motors. Their experimental results indicate that the amplitudes of the signal harmonic components do not vary expressively for rolling bearings without defects. Moreover, they state that statistical analysis using the kurtosis can show clearly the signal variations for bearings operating with defects. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref15">15</xref>] also employs kurtosis to analyze and diagnose rolling bearing failures. AE statistical analysis has also been used in machining process as it is shown in the work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref16">16</xref>] , which presents the values of Kurtosis associated with the AE signals measured during a run of a steel drawing process.</p><p>Kurtosis is a measure of dispersion that characterizes the shape of the probability distribution. Kurtosis is associated with the fourth statistical moment of a probability distribution. Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref17">17</xref>] defines Kurtosis as the ratio of the fourth moment <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the standard deviation σ raised to the power 4, as it is depicted in Equation (5).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.70347-formula108"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The skewness and kurtosis of the AE signal samples measured in the bump tests performed in this work are estimated to give some insights into the characteristics of the signal distribution.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental Procedures</title><p>The description of the experimental procedures employed in this work is presented into three items: 1) Shaft assembly; 2) AE data acquisition; and 3) AE signal analysis.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Apparatus Description</title><p>Six shafts made of commercial steel AISI 1020 are used in the bump tests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref18">18</xref>] . The basic dimensions of all shafts are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The shaft mass is 1.160 kg. The depth of the transversal crack is indicated by symbol a.</p><p>A transverse crack is etched on the shaft by machining. Section A-A in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the exact location of the transverse crack introduced into the shafts. The crack depth varies from zero to the value of the shaft radius. The values of ratio μ, which relates the crack depth a to the shaft radius r, for the shafts tested are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The shaft bump tests are performed at free-free boundary conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref10">10</xref>] . Both shaft ends are hanged from the test room ceiling using 0.8 mm diameter nylon wires with length of 1.2 m. An AE wideband transducer, model PAC S9208, is mounted on a special base using adhesive tape and grease within the contact surfaces. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> depicts the more important details of the shaft assembly indicating the AE sensor position and its movable base. It is highly recommended in vibration tests to mount the vibration transducer at the shaft ends to avoid some vibration mode node [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref10">10</xref>] . In acoustic emission tests such recommendation is not applicable, because the AE transducer is supposed to capture the propagating elastic waves along the shaft generated by the crack. For convenience, the AE transducer is mounted on the shaft right-hand side end, as it is indicated by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Shaft basic dimensions with typical transversal crack [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref18">18</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x13.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Ratio μ values for the six shafts used in this work</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shaft</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ratio μ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Schematic drawing of the cracked shafts for the bump tests</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x14.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. AE Instrumentation System</title><p>Each shaft undergoes five bump tests, which provide 30 AE signal samples for analysis. The bump is provided by a steel bar, which also is hanged from the ceiling using a 0.8 mm diameter nylon rope, as it is depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. A small pendular motion is induced in the testing shaft when the bar hits the shaft. The impact takes place always at the same position for all shafts. To avoid large variation on the impulse caused by the bump, the hitting metallic bar is connected by means of a fixed length nylon rope to a concrete column.</p><p>The data acquistion system (DAQ) consists of an AE transducer PAC S9208, a NI deck PXI1042, a processor NI PXI 8106, a DAQ NI PXI6115 and a DAQ NI TB2708. The NI Sound and Vibation kit is used to capture the AE signals at sampling frequency of 0.4 MHz and acquisition time of 0.4 s. The signal amplitude is captured in volts. The AE data collected during the bump tests are stored in a computer for posterior analysis. The software MatLab&#169; is employed to develop tools for analysis of the AE signal files.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. AE Signal Analysis</title><p>The 30 AE signal samples are analyzed in the time-domain using the software MatLab&#169;. The experimental data treatment is performed by using seven different approaches. In the first approach, the experimental data are treated by a Wavelet technique. Wavelet transform daubechies 4 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.70347-ref19">19</xref>] is employed in this approach. In the second approach, the AE signals are analyzed from 0.2 s to 0.4 s in all experiments, to eliminate the range of large variation at the initial testing times, in which the signal presents very high amplitudes followed by a strong decay. The curves of AE amplitude in volts versus time are the core of the third approach. The fourth approach is based on fitting a probability distribution to the time curve of AE signal. The AE signal average and standard deviation are computed for each sample. In the fifth approach, a similar statistical analysis is performed to estimate the AE signal average <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and standard deviation σ for each shaft, that is, for five samples simultaneously. The approximate normal distribution is generated for each shaft in the sixth approach. The seventh and last approach consists on the computation of the values of skewness and kurtosis for the AE data.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Analysis</title><p>It is noteworthy to say that assembly of the impacting metallic bar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) seems to be efficient enough to reduce the AE signal variations in the bump tests. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> de-</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Schematics of the shaft test rig indicating the assembly of the bumping metallic bar</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x16.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Comparative curves of AE signal versus time rendered from five bump tests performed on shaft 5</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x17.png"/></fig><p>picts the AE curves rendered from the five bump tests performed on shaft 5 (&#181; = 0.8). The AE signal patterns are basically the same in all five bump tests.</p><p>The curves of AE amplitude distribution versus frequency for the 30 bump tests are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Curves 5.a, 5.b, 5.c, 5.d, 5.e, and 5.f depict the five curves of AE amplitude probability distribution, respectively, for shafts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. It can be noticed that there is a spreading trend on the base of the distribution as the shaft crack increases.</p><p>Using the data from the distributions shown on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, it is possible to estimate the mean value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the standard deviation σ associated with the AE signals for each shaft. The average and the standard deviation are computed from the data collected in the five bump tests for each shaft. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> summarizes these values for all six shafts.</p><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Curves of AE signal probability distribution for five bump tests performed in the six shafts.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x19.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x20.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_3"><label> (d)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x21.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>The mean value and the standard deviation from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> can be used to adjust an equivalent normal distribution on the AE amplitude distribution for each shaft. The curves of AE amplitude probability distribution for each shaft are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Values of average <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and standard deviation σ for the six shafts</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shaft</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (V)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard deviation σ</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003626660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032385900</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.000432356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.042992375</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003069483</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.094906700</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.003982017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.101927033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001094927</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.119982500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.000899138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.127265333</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of equivalent normal probability distributions for six shafts</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8102651x24.png"/></fig><p>Finally, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> depicts the estimated values of kurtosis and skewness of each shaft for the AE data collected from the five bump tests. As the shaft crack depth increases (μ increases), it can be observed that the values of kurtosis and skewness decrease.</p><p>The decreasing values of kurtosis as the crack depth increases, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, indicate that a flattening on the AE signal amplitude peaks occurs when a crack is introduced into the shaft. This peak flattening increases as the ratio μ increases. This pattern can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. Moreover, the decreasing values of skewness as the crack size increases indicate, mathematically, that a shift on the AE amplitude peaks from the right-hand side to the left-hand side of the probability distribution takes place. This skewness shifting trend as the ratio μ increases is not apparent in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><p>A very important finding in this work is the possibility of performing bump tests on rotating shafts in order to identify the crack initiation and to monitor the crack growth. The AE signal can be used to identify the presence of a crack and may even estimate the crack size. Further research is necessary to apply the same data treatment techniques on the AE signals on vibration tests performed on real operating conditions.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Estimated values of kurtosis and skewness for the AE data rendered from each shaft</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shaft</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Kurtosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Skewness</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.347917255135211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.571204037268968</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.947854644597201</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.083357350231635</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.225201824844565</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.880486883586829</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.056556545486382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.778702767243726</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.763562767740631</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.550249606556120</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Final Remarks</title><p>The AE data rendered from the several bump tests performed on cracked shafts of different crack depths are treated by wavelet transform and statistical moments to analyze the influence of the crack size on the AE signal amplitude and frequency. The preliminary results obtained in this work indicate that a decrease on the AE amplitude peaks occurs as the crack depth increases. The values of kurtosis associated with the AE data apparently are very sensitive to the detection of geometric discontinuities in the shafts tested. At first glance, the statistical treatment of AE signals obtained in bump tests could be used to identify the crack initiation and monitor the crack growth in rotating shafts.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pimentel-Junior, G.L.S., Oliveira, F.B. and Faria, M.T.C. (2016) On the Bump Tests of Cracked Shafts Using Acoustic Emission Techniques. Engineering, 8, 572-581. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/eng.2016.89053</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.70347-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elforjani, M. and Mba, D. (2009) Detecting Natural Crack Initiation and Growth in Slow Speed Shafts with the Acoustic Emission technology. Engineering Failure Analysis, 16, 2121-2129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.02.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elforjani, M. and Mba, D. (2011) Condition Monitoring of Slow-Speed Shafts and Bearings with Acoustic Emission. Strain, 47, 350-363.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2010.00776.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kurz</surname><given-names> J.H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>Signal Conditioning of Acoustic Emissions and Ultrasound Signals</article-title><source> Otto-Graf-Journal</source><volume> 15</volume>,<fpage> 59</fpage>-<lpage>75</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Niknam, S.A., Thomas, T., Hines, J.W. and Sawhney, R. (2013) Analysis of Acoustic Emission Data for Bearings subject to Unbalance. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 4, 80-89.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mirhadizadeh, S.A., Moncholi, E.P. and Mba, D. (2010) Influence of Operational Variables in a Hydrodynamic Bearing on the Generation of Acoustic Emission. Tribology International, 43, 1760-1767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rahmam, M.D.Z., Ohba, H., Yamamoto, T. and Yoshioca, T. (2008) A Study on Incipient Damage Monitoring in Rolling Contact Fatigue Process Using Acoustic Emission. STLE Tribology Transactions, 51, 543-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10402000801888911</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elforjani, M. and Mba, D. (2010) Accelerated Natural Fault Diagnosis in Slow Speed Bearings with Acoustic Emission. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 77, 112-127.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.09.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Choudhury, A. and Tandon, N. (2000) Application of Acoustic Emission Technique for the Detection of Defects in Rolling Element Bearings. Tribology International, 33, 39-45.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-679X(00)00012-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Ghamda, A.M. and Mba, D. (2004) A Comparative Experimental Study on the Use of Acoustic Emission and Vibration Analysis for Bearing Defect Identification and Estimation of Defect Size. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20, 1537-1571.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.10.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vance, J.M. (1988) Rotordynamics of Turbomachinery. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ovacikli, A.K., P&amp;auml;&amp;auml;j&amp;auml;rvi, P., LeBlanc, J.P. and Carlson, J.E. (2014) Uncovering Harmonic Content via Skewnes Maximization—A Fourier Analysis. Proceedings of the 22nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Lisbon, 1-5 September 2014, 481-485.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P&amp;auml;&amp;auml;j&amp;auml;rvi, P. and LeBlanc, J.P. (2010) Fault-Impact Enhancement Using Aadaptive Filtering for Condition Monitoring of Ball Bearings. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Machinery Failure Prevention Technologies, Stratford-upon-Avon, 22-24 June 2010, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Durkhure, P. and Lodwal, A. (2014) Fault Diagnosis of Ball Bearing Using Time Domain Analysis and Fast Fourier Transformation. International Journal of Engineering Sciences &amp; Research Technology, 3, 711-715.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vrabie, V., Granjon, P., Maroni, C.S. and Leprettre, B. (2004) Application of Spectral Kurtosis to Bearing Fault Detection in Induction Motors. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Acoustical and Vibratory Surveillance Methods and Diagnostic Techniques (Surveillance 5), Senlis, 11-13 October 2004, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sawalhi, N. and Randall, R.B. (2004) The Application of Spectral Kurtosis to Bearing Diagnostics. Proceedings of Acoustics 2004, Gold Coast, 3-5 November 2004, 393-398.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, T.V. and Mattson, C.A. (2012) Propagating Skewness and Kurtosis through Engineering Models for Low-Cost, Meaningful, Nondeterministic Design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 134, 1009-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.4007389</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DeCarlo, L.T. (1997) On the Meaning and Use of Kurtosis. Psychological Methods, American Psychological Association, 2, 292-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pimentel-Junior, G.L.S., Oliveira, F.B. and Faria, M.T.C. (2015) Acoustic Emission Tests on the Analysis of Cracked Shafts of Different Crach Depths. Proceedings of the 23rd ABCM International Congress of Mechanical Engineering, Rio de Janeiro,6-11 December 2015, 1-8. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.20906/CPS/COB-2015-1434</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.70347-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lipinski, P. and Yatsymirskyy, M. (2007) Efficient 1D and 2D Daubechies Wavelet Transforms with Application to Signal Processing. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference ICANNGA 2007, Warsaw, 11-14 April 2007, 391-398.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>