<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2016.47133</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-68909</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  On Two Birkhoff-Type Interpolations with First- and Second-Order Derivative
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tinggang</surname><given-names>Zhao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yongjun</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Mathematics, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1269</fpage><lpage>1274</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>5</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>12</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, we consider two interpolations of Birkhoff-type with integer-order derivative. The Birkhoff interpolation is related with collocation method for the corresponding initial or boundary value problems of differential equations. The solvability of the interpolation problems is proved. For Gauss-type interpolating points, error of interpolation approximation is deduced. Also, we give efficient algorithms to implement the concerned interpolations.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Birkhoff Interpolation</kwd><kwd> Collocation Method</kwd><kwd> Gauss-Type Interpolating Point</kwd><kwd> Error Estimation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Back to 1906, an extension of polynomial interpolation which involves the values of derivatives of the interpolated function is studied by G. D. Birkhoff in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref1">1</xref>]. The Birkhoff interpolation (named after G. D. Birkhoff) may be defined as follow. Given a set of distinct interpolating points <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x4.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> data<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, to find a polynomial <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of degree <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula137"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If for each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the orders of derivatives in (1) form a unbroken sequence,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The interpolation problem above refers to Hermite interpolation. But in general, we say the Birkhoff interpolation which means the other case. It turns out that the Birkhoff interpolation problem is difficult and causes many literatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref2">2</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref7">7</xref>]. In contrast to Lagrange interpolation and Hermite interpolation, a Birkhoff interpolation problem does not always have a unique solution. For instance, there is no quadratic polynomial <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> an<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For solvability of Birkhoff interpolation problems, P&#242;lya condition is suggested in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref8">8</xref>] and developed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref9">9</xref>]. To construct the Birkhoff interpolation formulation, an algorithmic approach is presented in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref10">10</xref>] for Hermite-Birkhoff interpolation. There are also many results for (0, 2) interpolation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref11">11</xref>] and others.</p><p>In any way, the approximation theory of interpolation is in foundational importance of numerical analysis even of algorithm method for various scientific computing problems. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref12">12</xref>], authors suggested a well-condi- tioned collocation method based on a Birkhoff interpolation which achieved efficiency in computation. It is necessary to contemplate the Birkhoff interpolation appeared in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>This paper is organized as follow. In Section 2, we present the interpolation problems. In Section 3, we give solvability and representation of the problems. In Section 4, we present the interpolation errors. In Section 5, efficient algorithms for computing the interpolation polynomials are given. In Section 6, some conclusive remarks are given.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Interpolation Problems</title><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a set of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> distinct interpolating points posed on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which are arranged in increasingly order, namely</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula138"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the set of all polynomials of degree at most <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. First of all, we give two definitions of the concerned Birkhoff problems.</p><p>Problem 1. For any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the Birkhoff interpolation of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, denoted by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is a polynomial of degree<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which satisfies that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (2)</p><p>Remark. A similar interpolation for endpoint <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be defined by conditions as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The corresponding results is parallel to theirs for Problem 1.</p><p>Problem 2. For any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the Birkhoff interpolation of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, denoted by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is a polynomial of degree<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which satisfies that</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. (3)</p><p>We will verify that the two interpolation problems above are all solvable latterly. In common, it is unexpected that the interpolation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives a good approximation to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for arbitrary interpolating points. In order to achieve good approximation, we will consider the Gauss-type quadrature nodes as the interpolating points. However, solvability of the problems above has nothing to do with the interpolating points.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Solvability and Representations</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Solvability of the Problems</title><p>For Problem 1, the solvability is equivalent to invertibility of the following matrix</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula139"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We now check the matrix (4). The determinant of the matrix (4) is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We claim that the</p><p>Problem 1 is solvable from the invertibility of the matrix (4).</p><p>For Problem 2, the solvability is equivalent to invertibility of the following matrix</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula140"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We now check the matrix (5). By calculus, we know that the determinant of the matrix (5) is</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then Problem 2 is solvable from the invertibility of the matrix (5).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Representations of the Interpolation Operators</title><p>As with the Lagrange interpolation, we search for a nodal basis to represent the interpolating polynomial. For Problem 1, we need to look for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula141"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula142"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 1. The Birkhoff nodal basis has the following formulas:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula143"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula144"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula145"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. The proof is direct by computing. Here we omit it.</p><p>Making use of the nodal basis in Theorem 1, we have the representation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula146"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We now turn to Problem 2. Here need to look for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula147"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula148"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula149"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 2. The Birkhoff nodal basis has the following formulas:</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x62.png" /><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x61.png" /></p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula150"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula151"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. The proof is in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>Making use of the nodal basis in Theorem 2, we have the representation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula152"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. The Interpolation Errors on Gauss-Type Points</title><p>In this section, we will analyze the error between the online function and its Birkhoff interpolation approximation on Gauss-type interpolating points. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the classical Jacobi orthogonal polynomial of degree exact <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with index pair<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We take Jacobi-Gauss-Lobatto nodes as the interpolating points, namely, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the zeros of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (also zeros of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p><p>In order to analyze interpolation Problem 1, we introduce the following Lagrange-Gauss-Radau interpolation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined as: for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula153"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The following lemma (page 134, Theorem 3.42 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref13">13</xref>]) is important for error estimate.</p><p>Lemma 1. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have that for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula154"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive constant independent <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>From the Definitions of two interpolation operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we find that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula155"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we come to the following error estimation by combining the result in Lemma 1 with (10).</p><p>Theorem 3. Under the assumption of Lemma 1, it holds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula156"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive constant independent <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Next, we consider the interpolation Problem 2. We need the following Lagrange-Gauss interpolation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined as: for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula157"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The following lemma (page 132, Theorem 3.41 in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref13">13</xref>]) is important for error estimate.</p><p>Lemma 2. For <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula158"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive constant independent <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>From the Definitions of two interpolation operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we find that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula159"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now we come to the following error estimation. Similarly, combining the result in Lemma 2 with (12), we obtain</p><p>Theorem 4. Under the assumption of Lemma 2, it holds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula160"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a positive constant independent <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Efficient Formulations to Computing the Interpolations</title><p>The representation (7) (or (9)) with Theorem 1 (or with Theorem 2) is unconvenience for computing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). Here, we develop efficient algorithms to deal with them.</p><p>Case<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula161"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We only need to compute<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Derivating (14), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula162"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Making use of the orthogonality of Jacobi polynomials, we can obtain for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula163"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the Jacobi-Gauss-Radau quadrature at nodes <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is exact. At</p><p>last, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula164"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the weight corresponding to quadrature node <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of Jacobi-Gauss-Radau with the fixed endpoint<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Now we only left <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to determine. It is not difficult because that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula165"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Case<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we write</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula166"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We need to compute<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Derivating (18) twice, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula167"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Making use of the orthogonality of Jacobi polynomials, we can obtain for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula168"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the Jacobi-Gauss quadrature at nodes <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is exact.</p><p>At last, we have for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula169"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the weight corresponding to quadrature node <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of Jacobi-Gauss. Now there left <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be determined. In fact,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula170"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68909-formula171"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x142.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For every<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we need <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> operations to computing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in both cases. The computational complexity is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to obtain the interpolation polynomial (14) or (18) assuming that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68909x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are all pre-computed.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusive Remarks</title><p>Two Birkhoff-type interpolations which are related with first-order initial value problem and second-order boundary value problem respectively are considered in the paper. As in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68909-ref12">12</xref>], this Birkhoff interpolation leads to well-conditioned collocation matrices or pre-conditioner. We remark that it is worthy to consider the similar interpolations for high-order derivative case or fractional-order derivative case.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank the editor and the referee for their comments. The authors were supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11161026 and No. 11261027).</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tinggang Zhao,Yongjun Li, (2016) On Two Birkhoff-Type Interpolations with First- and Second-Order Derivative. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics,04,1269-1274. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2016.47133</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68909-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">[1]	Birkhoff, G.D. (1906) General Mean Value and Remainder Theorems with Applications to Mechanical Differentiation and Quadrature. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 7, 107-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1986339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lorentz, G.G. and Zeller, K.L. (1971) Birkhoff Interpolation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 8, 43-48.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0708006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lorentz, G.G., Jetter, K. and Riemenschneider, S.D. (1983) Birkhoff Interpo-lation. Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pólya, G. (1931) Bemerkung zur interpolation und zur N?herungstheorie der dalkenbiegung. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 11, 445-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19310110620 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karlin, S. and Karon, J.M. (1972) On Hermite-Birkhoff Interpolation. Journal of Approximation Theory, 6, 90-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9045(72)90085-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, A. (1972) Some Poised and Unpoised Problems of Interpolation. SIAM Review, 14, 129-151.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1014004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shi, Y.G. (2003) Theory of Birkhoff Interpolation. Nova Science Publishers, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ferguson, D.R. (1969) The Question of Uniqueness for G. D. Birkhoff Interpolation Problems. Jour-nal of Approximation Theory, 2, 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9045(69)90028-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palacios, F. and Rubió, P. (2003) Generalised Pólya Condition for Birkhoff Interpolation with Lacunary Polynomial. Applied Mathematics E-Notes, 3, 124-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mühlbach, G. (1981) An Algorithm Approach to Hermite-Birkhoff Interpolation. Numerische Mathematik, 37, 339- 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01400313</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Szili, L. (1996) A Survey on (0,2) Interpolation. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando E?tv?s Nominatae, Sectio Computatorica, 16, 377-390. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, L.L., Samson, M.D. and Zhao, X.D. (2014) A Well-Conditioned Collocation Method Using a Pseudospectral Integration Matrix. SIAM: SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 36, A907-A929.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/130922409</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68909-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, J., Tang, T. and Wang, L.L. (2011) Spectral Methods: Algorithms, Analysis and Applications. Springer, Berlin.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71041-7</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>