<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2016.47131</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-68849</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Class of Lie 2-Algebras in Higher-Order Courant Algebroids
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yanhui</surname><given-names>Bi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fengying</surname><given-names>Han</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Meili</surname><given-names>Sun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Mathematics and Information Science, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>1254</fpage><lpage>1259</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>12</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In this paper, we study the relation of the algebraic properties of the higher-order Courant bracket and Dorfman bracket on the direct sum bundle <em>TM</em>♁∧<em><sup>p</sup></em><em>T*M</em><em> </em>for an m-dimensional smooth manifold M, and a Lie 2-algebra which is a “categorified” version of a Lie algebra. We prove that the higher-order Courant algebroids give rise to a semistrict Lie 2-algebra, and we prove that the higher-order Dorfman algebroids give rise to a hemistrict Lie 2-algebra. Consequently, there is an isomorphism from the higher-order Courant algebroids to the higher-order Dorfman algebroids as Lie 2-algebras homomorphism. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Higher-Order Courant Algebroids</kwd><kwd> Higher-Order Dorfman Algebroids</kwd><kwd> Lie 2-Algebra</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The notion of Courant algebroid was introduced in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref1">1</xref>] to study the double of Lie bialgebroids. Equivalent definition was given by Roytenberg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref2">2</xref>]. In resent years, with the development and exploration of the theory of categorified Lie algebras, or “Lie 2-algebras”, Courant algebroids have been far and wide studied from several aspects and have been found many applications in the theory of Manin pairs and moment maps [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref4">4</xref>]; generalized complex structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref5">5</xref>]; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-algebras and symplectic supermanifolds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref2">2</xref>]; gerbes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref6">6</xref>] as well as BV algebras and topological field theories.</p><p>But these articles just introduced the Courant algebroids and Dorfman algebroids. And they did not find the relation between the higher-order Courant algebroids and the higher-order Dorfman algebroids.</p><p>The standard Courant algebroid is the direct sum bundle<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The standard Courant bracket is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula93"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>However, many experts know that on the direct sum bundle<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, there is also a similar bracket operation, i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula94"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which we call the higher-order Courant bracket. We have proved that the Jacobi identity holds up to an exact term.</p><p>So in our paper, we introduce the higher-order Courant algebroids and Dorfman algebroids, and find their relation. In Section 2, we review the higher-order Courant bracket and higher-order Courant Dorfman bracket. Also we review the basic definitions about the Dorfman algebroids and Lie 2-algebras. In Section 3, we intro- duce emphatically the equivalence between the higher-order Courant algebroids and higher-order Dorfman algebroids. In Thm. 3.1, we construct a Lie 2-algebra which is “semistrict”, meaning that the bracket is skew- symmetric, but the Jacobi identity holds only up to isomorphism, where the Lie bracket of observables is given instead by the higher-order Courant bracket. In Thm. 3.2, we construct another Lie 2-algebra with the same objects and morphisms, where the Lie bracket of observables is given instead by the higher-order Dorfman bracket. In Thm. 3.3, we show that these two Lie 2-algebras are isomorphic.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Preliminaries</title><p>In this section, we introduce the higher-order Courant and Dorfman bracket on the direct sum bundle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and associated properties. Also we review the definition of Lie 2-algebras.</p><p>First, there is a natural <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-valued nondegenerate symmetric pairing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on the direct sum bundle<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula95"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The higher-order Courant bracket satisfies some similar properties as the Courant bracket.</p><p>Theorem 2.1. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref7">7</xref>] For any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><p>1) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula96"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>3) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>4) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Second, we introduce the following higher-order Dorfman bracket,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula97"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The higher-order Dorfman bracket also satisfies similar properties as the usual Dorfman bracket.</p><p>Theorem 2.2. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref7">7</xref>] 1) For any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula98"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) The Dorfman bracket <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a Leibniz bracket, i.e. for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula99"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Consequently, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a Dorfman algebroid.</p><p>3) The pairing (2) and the higher-order Dorfman bracket is compatible in the following sense,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula100"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Third, we review some definitions about the Lie 2-algebra.</p><p>Definition 2.3. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref8">8</xref>] A Lie 2-algebra is a 2-term chain complex of vector spaces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> equipped with the following structure:</p><p>1) A chain map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which called the bracket;</p><p>2) A chain homotopy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which called the alternator;</p><p>3) An antisymmetric chain homotopy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which called the Jacobiator.</p><p>In addition, the following diagrams are required to commute:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula101"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula102"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Definition 2.4. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref8">8</xref>] A Lie 2-algebra for which the Jacobiator is the identity chain homotopy is called hemistrict. One for which the alternator is the identity chain homotopy is called semistrict.</p><p>Definition 2.5. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68849-ref8">8</xref>] Given Lie 2-algebras L and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with bracket, alternator and Jacobiator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, a homomorphism from L to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> consists of:</p><p>1) A Chain map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><p>2) A chain homotopy <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>such that the following diagrams commute:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula103"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Equivalence between p-Order Courant Algebroid and p-Order Dorfman Algebroid</title><p>In this section, we construct a “semistrict” Lie 2-algebra and a “hemistric” Lie 2-algebra and give the relation between p-order Courant algebroids and p-order Dorfman algebroids. We all know that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a p- order Courant algebroid, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a p-order Dorfman algebroid. We shall construct two Lie 2- algebras associated to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>: one hemistrict and one semistrict. Then we shall prove these are isomorphic. Both these Lie 2-algebras have the same underlying 2-term complex, namely:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula104"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where d is the usual exterior derivative of functions. To see that this chain complex is well-defined.</p><p>We make L into a semistrict Lie 2-algebra. For this, we use a chain map called the semi-bracket: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> In degree 0, the semi-bracket is given as in Equation (1)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula105"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In degrees 1 and 2, we set it equal to zero: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Theorem 3.1. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a p-order Courant algebroid, there is a semistrict Lie 2-algebra <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where</p><p>1) The space of 0-chains is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>2) The space of 1-chains is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>3) The differential is the exterior derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>4) The bracket is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>5) The alternator is the bilinear map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>6) The Jacobiator is the identity, hence given by the trilinear map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof. We note from Equation (1) that the semi-bracket is antisymmetric. Since both S and the degree 1 chain map are zero, the alternator defined above is a chain homotopy with the right source and target. So again, we just need to check that the Lie 2-algebra axioms hold. The following identities can be checked by simple calculation, and the commutativity of the last diagram follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula106"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula107"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since the Jacobiator is antisymmetric and the alternator is the identity, the first and second diagrams com- mute as well. The third diagram commutes because all the edges are identity morphisms. □</p><p>Next, the hemistrict Lie 2-algebra comes with a bracket called the hemi-bracket: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>In degree 0, the hemi-bracket is given as Dorfman bracket:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula108"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In degree 1, it is given by: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>In degree 2, we necessarily have<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> while <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>To see that the hemi-bracket is in fact a chain map, it suffices to check it on hemi-brackets of degree 1:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula109"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 3.2. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a p-order Dorfman algebroid, there is a hemistrict Lie 2-algebra <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> where</p><p>1) The space of 0-chains is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>2) The space of 1-chains is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>3) The differential is the exterior derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>4) The bracket is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>5) The alternator is the bilinear map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>6) The Jacobiator is the identity, hence given by the trilinear map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Proof That S is a chain homotopy with the right source and target follows from thm. (2.2) and the fact that:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula110"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thm. (2.2) also says that the Jacobi identity holds. The following equations then imply that J is also a chain homotopy with the right source and target:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula111"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula112"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula113"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So, we just need to check that the Lie 2-algebra axioms hold. The first and the last two diagrams commute since each edge is the identity. The commutativity of the second diagram from thm. (2.2) (3) is shown as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula114"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The third diagram says that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and this follows from the fact that the alternator is symmetric:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. □</p><p>Theorem 3.3. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are isomorphic as Lie 2-algebras.</p><p>Proof. We show that the identity chain maps with appropriate chain homotopies define Lie 2-algebra ho- momorphisms and that their composites are the respective identity homomorphisms. There is a homomorphism <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with the identity chain map and the chain homotopy given by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> This is a chain homotopy follows from the bracket relation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> noted in Equation (3) together with the equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula115"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We check that the two diagrams in the definition of a Lie 2-algebra homomorphism commute. Noting that the chain map <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the identity, the commutativity of the first diagram is easily checked by recalling that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the identities. Noting that any edge given by the bracket for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in degree 1 is the identity and that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the identity, we easily check the commutativity of the first diagram:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula116"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To check the commutativity of the second diagram we only need to perform the following calculation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula117"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The second diagram meet commutativity if and only if the following equation established:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula118"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Clockwise from the upper left to the lower right corner:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula119"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Counterclockwise from the upper left to the lower right corner:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula120"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Because of the commutativity of the second diagram we must have the the following equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula121"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula122"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>because of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get the following calculations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula123"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>if we choose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.68849-formula124"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/68849x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>□</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We give warmest thanks to Zhangju Liu and Yunhe Sheng for useful comments and discussion. We also thanks the referees for very helpful comments.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Funding</title><p>Research was partially supported by NSF of China (11126338, 11461047, 11201218).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yanhui Bi,Fengying Han,Meili Sun, (2016) A Class of Lie 2-Algebras in Higher-Order Courant Algebroids. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics,04,1254-1259. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2016.47131</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68849-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Z.J., Weinstein, A. and Xu, P. (1997) Manin Triples for Lie Bialgebroids. Journal of Differential Geometry, 45, 547-574.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roytenberg, D. Courant Algebroids, Derived Brackets and Even Symplectic Supermanifolds. PhD Thesis, UC Berkeley. arXiv:math.DG/9910078</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alekseev, A. and Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y. (2000) Manin Pairs and Moment Maps. Journal of Differential Geometry, 56, 133-165.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li-Bland, D. and Meinrenken, E. (2009) Courant Algebroids and Poisson Geometry. In-ternational Mathematics Research Notices, 11, 2106-2145.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gualtieri, M. Generalized Complex Geometry. arxiv:math.DG/0401221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">?evera, P. and Weinstein, A. (2001) Poisson Geometry with a 3-Form Background. Progress of The-oretical Physics Supplements, 144, 145-154. Noncommutative Geometry and String Theory (Yokohama, 2001). </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bi, Y.H. and Sheng, Y.H. (1990) On Higher Analogues of Courant Algebroids. Science China Mathematics A, Preprint.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68849-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roytenberg, D. On weak Lie 2-Algebras. arXiv:0712.3461</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>