<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2150-4091</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ns.2016.87036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NS-68219</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Electroplating Waste water on Immune Function in Kunming Mice
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zongqi</surname><given-names>Ma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guirong</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yufen</surname><given-names>Tian</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Deli</surname><given-names>Xu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaofeng</surname><given-names>Miao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ying</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiao</surname><given-names>Meng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Ni</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Weiwei</surname><given-names>Sun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Library, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>315</fpage><lpage>320</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>9</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Electroplating waste water is considered to be harmful to health of animals. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that electroplating waste water would suppress immune functions in Kunming mice. Twenty-six mice were randomly divided into the control group (n = 13) and the experimental group (n = 13), in which the latter drank electroplating waste water. We found that body mass and most organ wet masses (heart, lungs, liver, kidneys, stomach, caecum, colon, testes, epididymis, seminal vesicals) were not influenced by electroplating waste water. However, stomach with its content, small intestine, small intestine with its contents and colon with its contents were higher in the experimental group than in the control group. As expected, phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) response indicative of cellular immunity was suppressed by electroplating waste water. White blood cells, thymus and spleen mass were all not response to electroplating waste water. Taken together, electroplating waste water had different effects on distinct components of immune system in Kunming mice.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Electroplating Waste Water</kwd><kwd> Mice</kwd><kwd> Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) Response</kwd><kwd> Immune Function</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Electroplating waste water is produced in the electroplating industries such as the machinery manufactured, light and electronic industries. Due to its harmful components such as chromium, cadmium and cyanide and other toxic chemicals, it is considered to pollute the environments and impair human health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Some researchers have reported the harmful effects of electroplating waste water in shrimps and fishes. For example, electroplating waste water has harmful influence on the embryos and juveniles of shrimps and fishes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref6">6</xref>] . Many fishes died in a river near the city of Guanzhou in China in February 2006, which was mainly caused by electroplating waste water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref7">7</xref>] . However, influence of electroplating waste water on small mammals receives little attention.</p><p>Phytohaemagglutinin (PHA) response has been used to evaluate mammalian cellular immunity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref9">9</xref>] . Immune organs such as thymus and spleen are also indicative of immune function [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref12">12</xref>] . Thymus is crucial for primary T cell development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref10">10</xref>] , and a larger spleen implies a stronger immune system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref12">12</xref>] . In addition, total white blood cells (WBC), which are important for immune response against pathogens, are also useful to assess the overall health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref11">11</xref>] . Due to the scarce research about the effect of electroplating waste water on rodents, we tested the hypothesis that electroplating waste water would suppress immune function in mice in the present study.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Animals and Experimental Design</title><p>All animal procedures were licensed under the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Qufu Normal University. Adult male Kunming mice (age: 5 - 6 months) used in this study were obtained from Experiment Animal Center in Shandong Lukang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The animals were housed individually in plastic cages (30 cm &#215; 15 cm &#215; 20 cm) with sawdust as bedding under a natural light. The experiment was carried out from May 10<sup>th</sup> to June 15<sup>th</sup> in 2014. Standard rat pellets chow (Shandong Lukang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jining, China ) and water were provided ad libitum. After body mass stabilized, 26 male mice were randomly divided into the control group (n = 13) and the experimental group (n = 13). Mice in the control group had free access to water, whereas mice in the experimental group had free access to the electroplating waste water (chromium (Cr): 0.0784 &#181;g/ml, nickel (Ni): 36.4 &#181;g/ml, lead (Pb): 277 &#181;g/ml, Copper (Cu): 153.2 &#181;g/ml, Zinc (Zn): 12.6 &#181;g/ml). Food was provided ad libitum throughout the experiment and the experimental course lasted for 27 days. One mouse in the control group and another in the experimental group died after 8 days and 22 days respectively. These two mice were not included in the subsequent statistical analysis. Day 0 and day n repre- sented initial day and n days of treatment, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Organs and Body Composition</title><p>Organs were examined as described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref13">13</xref>] . In brief, after mice were killed, the visceral organs, including heart, thymus, lungs, liver, spleen, kidneys, adrenal glands, testes, epididymis, seminal vesicals and the digestive organs with contents (i.e., stomach, small intestine, caecum and colon) were dissected and weighed (&#177;1 mg). The stomach, small intestine, caecum and colon were rinsed with saline to eliminate all the gut contents, before being weighed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Cellular Immunity Assays</title><p>PHA response was assessed as described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref13">13</xref>] . Specifically, Kunming mice in the control and experimental groups on day 24<sub> </sub>were caught, then we measured their footpad thickness of the left hind foot with a micrometer (Digimatic Indicator ID-C Mitutoyo Absolute cod. 547-301, Japan) to &#177; 0.01 mm . Immediately thereafter, mice in the control and experimental groups were injected subcutaneously 0.1 mg of PHA (PHA-P, Sigma L-8754) dissolved in 0.03 mL of sterile saline (pH 7.4) in the middle of the footpad. After 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h injection, we measured footpad thickness. The PHA response (i.e., cellular immunity) was calculated as the difference between pre- and post-injection measurements divided by initial footpad thickness (PHA response = (post PHA − pre PHA)/pre PHA). Six measures of footpad thickness were taken to obtain the value of each mouse [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. White Blood Cells Assays</title><p>White blood cells were counted as described previously [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref13">13</xref>] . Briefly, at the end of the experiment, 20 &#181;L whole blood was diluted immediately in 0.38 mL solution containing 1.5% glacial acetic acid, 1% crystal violet (Sigma) and the leukocytes were counted in an improved Neubauer chamber using microscope. The total number of WBC was determined by counting all leucocytes in the four corner large-squares of the Neubauer chamber, and multiplying the raw data by 5 &#215; 10<sup>7</sup> to obtain the final values (10<sup>9</sup> cells/L).</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago , IL , USA ). Prior to all statistical analyses, data were examined for normality and homogeneity of variance, using Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests, respectively. The ratio values including PHA response were subjected to arcsine transformation. The differences of body mass between the control and experimental groups at any time point were analyzed by independent- samples t-test. Group differences in wet organ mass with body mass as the covariate were analyzed by General Linear Model multivariate analysis followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests. Group differences in other parameters (body compositions, PHA response, WBC) were analyzed by independent-samples t-test. Results were expressed as mean &#177; SE, and P &lt; 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Body Mass</title><p>Body mass did not differ between the control and experiment groups from the beginning to the end of the experiment (day 0: t = −0.592, df = 21, P = 0.560; day 27: t = 0.829, df = 21, P = 0.417) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Organs</title><p>Electroplating waste water increased the masses of stomach with its content, small intestine, small intestine with its contents and colon with its contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). However, masses of immune organs (i.e., thymus and spleen) and other organs were not influenced by electroplating waste water (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Cellular Immunity</title><p>Electroplating waste water suppressed 6 h (t = 2.781, df = 21, P = 0.011) and 12 h (t = 2.185, df = 21, P = 0.040) of PHA responses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). PHA responses of 24 h (t = 1.547, df = 21, P = 0.137), 48 h (t = 1.787, df = 21, P = 0.088), 72 h (t = 1.303, df = 21, P = 0.207) did not differ between the experimental and control groups.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. White Blood Cells</title><p>WBC in the experiment group was not different from the control group (t = 0.140, df = 21, P = 0.890) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>As expected, cellular immunity in Kunming mice was impaired by electroplating waste water, however other</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of electroplating waste water on body mass in Kunming mice</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8302758x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of electroplating waste water on PHA response in Kunming mice. An asterisk (<sup>*</sup>) indicates statistical differences at P &lt; 0.05</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8302758x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of electroplating waste water on total white blood cells in Kunming mice</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-8302758x9.png"/></fig><p>immunological parameters including white blood cells, thymus and spleen mass did not differ between the control and experimental mice.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Body Mass, Organs and Waste Water</title><p>Electroplating waste water had no effect on body mass and most organ masses. Stomach with its content, small intestine, small intestine with its contents and colon with its contents increased upon electroplating waste water, implying that the digestive capacity of mice might improve.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Immunity and Waste Water</title><p>Cellular immunity in mice was impaired by electroplating waste water, indicating their capacity of fighting against pathogens decreased. Other immunological parameters including white blood cells, thymus and spleen mass were all not response to electroplating waste water. These results demonstrated that different components of immune system had distinct sensitivities to electroplating waste water. Due to the complex components of electroplating waste water in our study, it was difficult to clarify which component played the major role in affecting immune function in mice. Effect of single heavy metal on immunity has been conducted in some researches. For example, dietary chromium can increase the levels of immunoglobulin M in juvenile rockfish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref14">14</xref>] . Lower dietary nickel concentrations suppressed while higher nickel concentrations increased immune responses of Fabricius larvae [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref15">15</xref>] . In addition, negative correlation was observed between elevated lead levels and the percentage of natural killer cells, blood hepatitis B surface antibody levels in children from an electronic waste recycling area [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref17">17</xref>] . Although copper is recognized as an essential trace element, uncertainties remain regarding copper reference values for humans. For instance, very low copper intake may impair immune function in human [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref18">18</xref>] . However, low levels of copper contamination may enhance immunity of estuarine bivalves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref19">19</xref>] . Zinc is an essential trace element which is important for maintenance and development of immune cells of both the innate and adaptive immune system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68219-ref20">20</xref>] . Synergistic or antagonistic actions among different metals in electroplating waste water on immunity in mice need further researches in the future.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of electroplating waste water on wet organ mass in Kunming mice</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Experiment</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statistical summary</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample size</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heart (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.153 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.151 &#177; 0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.715</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lungs (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.342 &#177; 0.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.322 &#177; 0.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.671</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Liver (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.777 &#177; 0.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.750 &#177; 0.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.703</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spleen (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.113 &#177; 0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089 &#177; 0.009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.085</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kidneys (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.459 &#177; 0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.473 &#177; 0.019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.614</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomach with contents (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.655 &#177; 0.069<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.976 &#177; 0.069<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomach (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.189 &#177; 0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.202 &#177; 0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.232</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small intestine with contents (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.828 &#177; 0.075<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.070 &#177; 0.075<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small intestine (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.880 &#177; 0.051<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.078 &#177; 0.051<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small intestine length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.5 &#177; 1. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.5 &#177; 1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.287</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caecum with contents (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.493 &#177; 0.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.575 &#177; 0.040</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.169</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caecum (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.225 &#177; 0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.122 &#177; 0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.173</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caecum length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.530 &#177; 0.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.795 &#177; 0.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.073</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon with contents (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.555 &#177; 0.039<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.689 &#177; 0.039<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.024</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.298 &#177; 0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.283 &#177; 0.025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.676</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Colon length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.572 &#177; 1.235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.262 &#177; 5.623</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.360</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total digestive tract (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.403 &#177; 0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.483 &#177; 0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.534</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total digestive tract length (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.6 &#177; 4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.6 &#177; 4.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.339</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epedidymus (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.072 &#177; 0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.066 &#177; 0.007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.548</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Testes (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.271 &#177; 0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.239 &#177; 0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.222</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seminal vesical (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.166 &#177; 0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.152 &#177; 0.013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.437</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Values are means &#177; SE. Values for a specific parameter that share different superscripts are significantly different at P &lt; 0.05, determined by General Linear Model multivariate analysis followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests with body mass as the covariate ns, not significant.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In summary, electroplating waste water harmed cellular immunity in mice, whereas other immunological parameters (i.e., white blood cells, thymus and spleen mass) were not response to electroplating waste water. Due to the complex constituents of electroplating waste water, further research is required to study synergistic or antagonistic actions among different metals of electroplating waste water on immune function in the future. Taken together, electroplating waste water had distinct impacts on different immunological parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31370427), Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province (ZR2013CM019) and Undergraduate Scientific Research and Training Program of Qufu Normal University (2014A054) and the Crosswise Project (hxkj- 2014001).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Zongqi Ma,Guirong Wang,Yufen Tian,Deli Xu,Xiaofeng Miao,Ying Zhang,Jiao Meng,Hong Ni,Weiwei Sun, (2016) Effect of Electroplating Waste water on Immune Function in Kunming Mice. Natural Science,08,315-320. doi: 10.4236/ns.2016.87036</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68219-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cai</surname><given-names> Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Effect of Electroplating Wastewater on Human Health and Its Centralized Processing</article-title><source> Agricultural Journal of Environmental Science</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 205</fpage>-<lpage>208</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, C., Liu, Z. and Zhou, P. (2013) Electroplating Industry Environment Analysis and Pollution Control Countermeasures. Environmental Protection, 5, 206-207.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, S. and Qu, K. (2004) Acute Toxicity Effect of Three Kinds of Industrial Wastewater on Chinese Shrimp Larva and Postlarva. Chinese Fisheries Science, 3, 220-225.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qu, K., Chen, M., Ma, S. and Xin, F. (2003) Toxicity Effect of Three Kinds of Industrial Wastewater on Flounder Embryos. Chinese Fisheries Science, 2, 155-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qu, K., Chen, M., Ma, S. and Xin, F. (2002) Acute Toxic Effect and Joint Toxicity of Several Kinds of Industrial Wastewater on Flounder Larvaes. Marine Fisheries Research, 23, 40-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qu, K., Ma, S., Qi, M., Bu, X., Qiao, X. and Yuan, J. (2004) Toxic Effects of Three Kinds of Industrial Waste Water on Chinese Prawn Embryo. Marine Fisheries Research, 25, 29-35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, D., Hu, D., Yu, W. and Liang, Y. (2008) The Application of Acute Toxic Test in Fish on the Dead Fish Events Arbitration Monitoring. Environment and Ecology in the Three Gorges, 1, 19-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smits, J.E., Bortolotti, G.R. and Tella, J.L. (1999) Simplifying the Phytohaemagglutinin Skin-Testing Technique in Studies of Avian Immunocompetence. Functional Ecology, 13, 567-572.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00338.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bellocq, J.G., Krasnov, B.R., Khokhlova, I.S. and Pinshow, B. (2006) Temporal Dynamics of a T-Cell Mediated Immune Response in Desert Rodents. Comparative and Biochemical Physiology Part A, 145, 554-559. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.08.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Savino, W. and Dardenne, M. (2000) Neuroendocrine Control of Thymus Physiology. Endocrine Reviews, 21, 412-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.21.4.412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calder, P.C. and Kew, S. (2002) The Immune System: A Target for Functional Foods? British Journal of Nutrition, 88, S165-S176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002682</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, K.G. and Hunt, J.L. (2004) On the Use of Spleen Mass as a Measure of Avian Immune System Strength. Oecologia, 138, 28-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1409-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, D.L. and Wang, D.H. (2010) Fasting Suppresses T Cell-Mediated Immunity in Female Mongolian Gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus). Comparative and Biochemical Physiology Part A, 155, 25-33.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.09.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, J.H. and Kang, J.C. (2016) The Toxic Effects on the Stress and Immune Responses in Juvenile Rockfish, Sebastes schlegelii Exposed to Hexavalent Chromium. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 43, 128-133. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2016.03.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sun, H.X., Dang, Z., Xia, Q., Tang, W.C. and Zhang, G.R. (2011) The Effect of Dietary Nickel on the Immune Responses of Spodoptera litura Fabricius Larvae. Journal of Insect Physiology, 57, 954-961.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.04.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, X., Chen, X., Zhang, J., Guo, P., Fu, T., Dai, Y., Lin, S.L. and Huo, X. (2015) Decreased Blood Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Levels Linked to E-Waste Lead Exposure in Preschool Children. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 298, 122-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.05.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., Huo, X., Cao, J., Yang, T., Xu, L. and Xu, X. (2016) Elevated Lead Levels and Adverse Effects on Natural Killer Cells in Children from an Electronic Waste Recycling Area. Environmental Pollution, 213, 143-150. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bost, M., Houdart, S., Oberli, M., Kalonji, E., Huneau, J. and Margaritis, I. (2016) Dietary Copper and Human Health: Current Evidence and Unresolved Issues. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 35, 107-115. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2016.02.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ivanina, A.V., Hawkins, C. and Sokolova, I.M. (2016) Interactive Effects of Copper Exposure and Environmental Hypercapnia on Immune Functions of Marine Bivalves Crassostrea virginica and Mercenaria mercenaria. Fish &amp; Shellfish Immunology, 49, 54-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2015.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68219-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonaventura, P., Benedetti, G., Albar&amp;egrave;de, F. and Miossec, P. (2015) Zinc and Its Role in Immunity and Inflammation. Autoimmunity Reviews, 14, 277-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2014.11.008</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>