<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Access Library Journal</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-9705</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/oalib.1101214</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OALibJ-68094</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Survey on Demodex Infections for Undergraduate Students in Some Universities in Ningbo City of Zhejiang Province of China
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tonghe</surname><given-names>Pan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xianqun</surname><given-names>Rao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Liao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhongjie</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xinyi</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shengqian</surname><given-names>Zhu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xinqian</surname><given-names>Gu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaobo</surname><given-names>Cai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guofeng</surname><given-names>Chan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shuangyan</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jianfa</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>liujianfa@nbu.edu.cn(JL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>31</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>5</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>15</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>1</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Objective: The purpose of this survey is to investigate the university students’ face infections with Demodex, and explore the possible factors of Demodex infections. Methods: On this survey, the following pressure method is adopted. The operator has used sterilized thumb against the client part of the facial skin, observing mites under microscopy. Results: The results of the survey for the total Demodex infection rate were 32.50%. Demodex folliculorum infection rate was 39.49%, Demodex brevis infection rate was 49.74%, and the mixed infection rate was 10.77%. Conclusions: This survey shows that college students’ Demodex infection rate is serious according to the corresponding social customs. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>College Students</kwd><kwd> Demodex Infection</kwd><kwd> Survey</kwd><kwd> Ningbo City</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Demodex families are kinds of small permanent parasitic mites, namely sebaceous follicle Demodex and brevis Demodex. The two parasites mainly parasitize the body of man’s forehead, nose, chin and zygomatic places. Mechanical and chemical stimulation can cause skin diseases such as acne, seborrheic dermatitis, and folliculitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref1">1</xref>] . As a result of investigation, Demodex infection rate presents the different levels. Thus, we had investigated the Demodex infections in College students of Ningbo City from December 2012 to March 2013. The results have been shown as follows.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials</title><p>Investigated people: totally 600 people, 336 boys and 264 girls at 2009-2011 grades of college students of Ningbo City.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Methods</title><p>Survey methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref2">2</xref>] : The survey contents include personal diet, accommodation environment, hygiene, etc. At the same time, recording client’s age, gender, facial disorders, health situation, the collective life and infection degree standards</p><p>Checking out any Demodex infections are considered to be positive. Infection degrees of each sample are calculated, all degrees are divided into 3 levels, level 1 is to be degree I (mild); level 2 is to be degree II (moderate); level 3 is to be degree III (serious).</p><p>Types of infections: The infection types are divided into three types: sebum Demodex infection, brevis infection and mixed infections with follicles.</p><p>All data are treated with spss12.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. The Infection Rates of Demodex Mites</title><p>All tables showed include 600 university students, among 195 infected students, male’s infection rate was 35.71%, female’s infection rate was 28.41%, infection rate between male and female students with P values were more than 0.05, which means no statistical significance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. The Infection Degrees with Demodex Mites</title><p>Among 195 students infected, first-degree infection rate accounted for 72.82%, second-degree infection rate accounted for 15.90%, third-degree infection rate accounted for 11.28% (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Facial Diseases and Mite Infection</title><p>The face demonstrated seborrheic dermatitis, folliculitis of Demodex infection rates were greater than the normal facial skin infected, facial diseases and mite infection’s P value was less than 0.01, there was a statistically significant difference (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> University students’ facial Demodex infection rate</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tested samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Infection samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Infection rate (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Infection degree of university students with facial Demodex mites</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Infection degree</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First-degree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Second-degree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Third-degree</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.28</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The Demodex infections of facial skins</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >The condition of facial skin</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of tested people</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of positive people</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive rate (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acne</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seborrheic dermatitis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Folliculitis or hair follicle expansion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.91</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Conditions of Demodex Infections among Students Who Use Skin Care Products and Those Who Don’t Use</title><p>The number of students who use skin care products is 139, the positive rate was 30.48%, while the number of those who don’t use was 56, positive rate was 38.89%. The positive rate for whom uses skin care products and those with products not used among students with Demodex infections, their P values are greater than 0.05, means no statistical significance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. The Ratio of Different Infections with Demodex</title><p>Among 195 students’ Demodex infections, simple follicle Demodex are 97 people, simple sebum Demodex are 77 people, and 21 people with mixed infections (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Demodex Infections among Urban and Rural Students</title><p>Among 473 students who live in rural areas, 153 people are positive, the infection rate was 32.35%. Among 127 students who live in the city, 42 people were positive, urban the infection rate was 33.07%, where P values were greater than 0.05, which had no statistical significance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_7"><title>4.7. Different Ways of Cleansing Demodex Infections of Students</title><p>Cleansing 133 people with water, which is effective for 57 people, the positive rate was 45.86%; cleansing 49 people using soap, which is effective for 49 people, the positive rate was 26.53%; cleansing 411 people using cleanser, which is effective for 123 people, the positive rate of 29.93%; commonly using soap intergrated cleanser to cleanse 7 people, 2 were effective, the positive rate was 28.57%. Calculated with the chi-square test, P value was less than 0.05, with highly statistical significance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_8"><title>4.8. The Treatment of Facial Demodex Cases Using Various Drugs</title><p>Treating students with 2% mebendazole mixture , 39 cases were negative, negative rate was 78%; oral metronidazole tablets in patients, 43 were negative, negative rate of 86%; oral tinidazole tablets in patients, 44 were negative, negative rate of 88%; Compatibly treated with metronidazole ointment of pure pink and yellow snake patients, there were 47 negative, negative rate was 94%; Compatibly treated with sulfur ointment and glycerol patients, there were 49 negative, negative rate was 98%; patients treated with cream, 13 people were negative, negative rate was 26%. P values were less than 0.01, which were statistically significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>Demodex infections are distributed worldwide, and the population infection rate abroad is about 27% - 100% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref3">3</xref>] , but the infection rate in China is about 20% - 70% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref4">4</xref>] . The Demodex infection rate of all college students is greatly different, too. In the investigation into College students in some universities in Ningbo City, the Demodex infection rate is 32.50%, which is in accordance with the domestic normal infection rate. The main causes of the differences in the rate of infections with Demodex are attributed to geographical environment, climatic conditions, the season of checking, the site of checking and inspection methods, etc. In this research, we had investigated into the mites infections at the same population using scraping pressure method and sticking method. The results showed that the former method was better than the latter in the nose and face detection. The detection</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> The comparison of Demodex mites infection between students who use and who don’t</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of tested people</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of positive people</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive rate (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Skin care products users</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.48%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No skin care products users</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.89%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Different infection cases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Infected with Demodex</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of positive infections</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Infection rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simplex mites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.17%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simplex sebum Demodex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.83%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mixed infections</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Demodex infections among urban and rural students compared to the different situations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Surveyed</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rural</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >473</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.35%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >City</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.07%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Cleansing Demodex infections on students with different ways compared to the infections’ situations</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Surveyed</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shimizu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.86%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soap</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.53%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cleanser</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >411</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.93%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Soap + cleanser</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.57%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >195</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.50%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> The treatment of demodex infections using different drugs</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Drugs</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Negative numbers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Negative rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treated with 2% mixture of mebendazole</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treated with Oral metronidazole tablets</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treated with Oral tinidazole tablets</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pure powders with metronidazole ointment and yellow snake powders</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfur ointment and glycerol capsules</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.00%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cream coated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.00%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>rate is association with the amount of sebum. The more the amount of sebum is, the higher the detection rate is [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref4">4</xref>] . Demodex mites parasitic in hair follicles and sebaceous glands which mechanically stimulate and secrete some pathological factors can damage the hair follicles and sebaceous glands, leading to hair follicle expansion and epithelial degeneration; at the same time, they are also able to lead to the dermal telangiectasia, hyperplasia, and blocking of sebaceous gland secretion. The worms can carry pathogenic microorganisms, when at concurrent bacterial infection, causing the hair follicle cell infiltration, fibrous tissue hyperplasia, performance for the local skin flushing, hyperaemia, inflammation, enlarged pores, and rough surfaces. In this paper, the total Demodex infection rate was 32.50%, the infection rate was 35.71% for males, and 28.41% for females. The differences from infection rate of male and female are not statistically significant, but most reports such as Zhang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref5">5</xref>] find that men have a higher rate of infection than women, the cause of which still needs further study. We had detected the different types of Demodex infections mainly including Demodex follicurolum, Demodex brevis and mixed infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref6">6</xref>] . In infected persons, infections of Degree I accounted for 72.82% of the total, Degree II infections accounted for 15.90%, and Degree III infections accounted for 11.28%, which was consistent with the infections of Demodex mites reported before [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref7">7</xref>] . For patients with or without acne, our survey showed that infection rate of patients with acne was higher than those without acne, which had statistical significance. So, Demodex is one of the causes of acne for patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref8">8</xref>] , and water cleansing is the destruction of drying and high- temperature conditions, making people susceptible to infection of vermiform mite. But if using soap and cleanser alkaline substances, normal human can resist the infection of vermiform mite. In the experimental groups with different treatments, the best use of combined sulfur ointment and glycerin coated metronidazole in pure powder and snake yellow ointment to the experimental groups, and the negative rate for infections reached 98% and 94%. We found that experiments coated with ointment smearing part had important significance for patients, the patients applied in nose and nasal groove parts, and the negative rate was higher than those applied in cheeks. Propagation on Demodex infections of populations who are more vulnerable to infection is necessary. Therefore, to prevent infection, we should enhance propaganda, enable students to understand the knowledge on Demodex prevention, developing good health habits, washing supplies special, paying attention to personal hygiene, keeping the face clean, trying to avoid close contact with patients, and cutting off the transmission route [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref9">9</xref>] . Patients with being positive for infections with acne, rosacea and other facial diseases should be timely treated, lest loss of illness would be incurred because of delay [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68094-ref12">12</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tonghe Pan,Xianqun Rao,Qi Liao,Zhongjie Lin,Xinyi Zhang,Shengqian Zhu,Xinqian Gu,Xiaobo Cai,Guofeng Chan,Shuangyan Li,Jianfa Liu, (2015) A Survey on Demodex Infections for Undergraduate Students in Some Universities in Ningbo City of Zhejiang Province of China. Open Access Library Journal,02,1-5. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1101214</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68094-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, S.H. and Wang, L.L. (2006) Review on the Biological Research of Human Demodex. Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, 24, 379-384.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J., Wang, W., Fu, H., et al. (2012) Analysis of Demodex Infection among College Students Using Skin Scrapings Collected with Cellophane Tape during the Daytime. Journal of pathogen Biology, 7, 454-456.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y.-E. and Guo, N. (2011) Sociodemographic Characteristics and Risk Factor Analysis of Demodex Infestation (Acari: Demodicidae). Zhejiang Univ-Sci B (Biomed &amp; Biotechnol), 12, 995-1007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y.E., Guo, N. and Wu, L.P. (2009) The Effect of Temperature on the Viability of Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis. Parasitology Research, 105, 1623-1628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1603-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, M.H., Xia, H. and Hu, S.F. (2005) Investigation on Demodex Infection in Undergraduates and Observation on Treatment. J Trop Dis. Parasitol, 3, 214-217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ha, L.-N., Yang, F.-Q. and Ha, X.-L. (2012) Analysis of Face Infection of Demodex Mite in Medical College Students between 2000 and 2009. Modern Preventive Medicine, 39, 4795-4798.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiong, M.Y., Fu, F.D. and Zhou, Y. (2011) Survey on Demodex Infection in College Students. Medical Research and Education, 28, 41-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qin, Y.-H., Zheng, L.-L., Dai, X.-D., et al. (2013) Infection of Follicle Mite (Demodex Mite) in College Students: Survey and Analysis. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 25, 718-719.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cao, Y.S., You, Q.X. and Wang, L. (2009) Facial Demodex Infection among College Students in Tangshan. Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, 27, 271-273.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, A.H. and Wang, T. (2008) Analysis of the Relation between the Facial Skin Diseases and the Infection of Demodicid Mites in Teenagers. Modern Preventive Medicine, 35, 3396-3399.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhan, X.M. (2001) Human Parasitology. 5th Edition, People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, 173-175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68094-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Y.L. (2008) Human Parasitology. 7th Edition, People’s Medical Publishing House, Beijing, 252-254.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>