<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2016.79126</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-68068</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  &lt;i&gt;In Vitro&lt;/i&gt; Micropropagation of Himalayan Weeping Bamboo, &lt;i&gt;Drepanostachyum falcatum&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Himanshu</surname><given-names>Saini</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Inder</surname><given-names>Dev Arya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarita</surname><given-names>Arya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Reetu</surname><given-names>Sharma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Tissue Culture Discipline, Botany Division, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Genetic Resource Center, International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, HQ &amp;amp; West Africa Hub, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>07</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1317</fpage><lpage>1324</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>5</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Plant growth hormone BAP (benzyl amino purine), KIN (kinetin), NAA (1-naphthalene acetic acid) and IBA (indole-3 butyric acid) effect was studied on 
  in vitro
   multiplication of shoots and rooting of 
  Drepanostachyum falcatum
  . 
  In vitro
   micropropagation of himalayan weeping bamboo is explained by 
  in vitro
   shoot induction and proliferation. Excised explant with axillary bud is surface sterilized with 0.1% HgCl
  <sub>2</sub>
   for 10 - 12 minutes, cleaned with 90% ethanol and inoculated on liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) culture medium supplemented with different concentrations of BAP/ KIN. Effect of BAP/KIN on shoot induction is with different rate and number of shoots produced by explants with axillary bud cultured on MS media supplemented with 0.0 mg/L BAP/KIN - 5.5 mg/L BAP/KIN. Shoot multiplication with highest rate is achieved on MS medium supplemented with 3.5 mg/L BAP after 4
  <sup>th</sup>
   sub-culturing. The most effective with highest rate and number of root induction combination is 6.5 mg/L IBA after 5 weeks. The roots produced by 6.5 mg/L IBA is best compared with other combination of auxin NAA (1-naphthalene acetic acid).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;In Vitro</kwd><kwd> Drepanostachyum falcatum&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Himalayan Weeping Bamboo</kwd><kwd> Plant Growth Hormone</kwd><kwd> Micropropagation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Drepanostachyum falcatum is economically important bamboo commonly known as Himalayan weeping bamboo are the most harvested species for making baskets, mats, flowerpots etc. and other commercial purposes in district Rudraprayag, Garhwal region, Uttarakhand. It is also used in compounding many medicines, making lotion for cleaning wounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref1">1</xref>] and used as soil and water conservation tool [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>This species is introduced in Nilgiri Hills, Europe, South and North America, Laos and Entebbe Botanic Garden, Uganda. It is found in the hills areas of North India―Garhwal and Kumaon hills and is also marketed as “blue bamboo” due to the cold hardy plant nature. It grows at altitudes up to 2100 m in high slopes, high terraces in moist, sheltered, shady conditions. It grows well in sheltered shady spot into a 3 - 4 meter plant with masses of small drooping leaves and prefers rich sandy loam to clayey loam soil often mixed with stones. It can be trimmed for a good indoor bamboo plant. Drepanostachyum falcatum flowers irregularly at times, gregarious over large areas, while few culms may be found in flowers almost every year. This belongs to the irregularly flowering group with the flowering and seedling cycle of 28 - 30 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref3">3</xref>] . Recorded flowering was in Shimla in 1858, 1916; Mussoorie in 1916, Jaunsar in 1868, 1916; Tehri Garhwal in 1916, Kew, England in 1908. The importance of this species is highlighted by the diverse uses; it is put to by the locals.</p><p>Looking to the tremendous economical importance of D. falcatum due to its multifarious uses, there is always a shortage of planting stock material of this bamboo. Due to over exploitation and large scale indiscriminate cutting of natural stands of ringal bamboo, the plant is now facing threat of its existence and survivability in the hilly areas of Uttarakhand. Availability of seed is also reduced drastically for raising planting stocks. Since the bamboos is of commercially importance and provides livelihood and useful material to the rural areas of the hills therefore it is in huge demand for its plantation which may be for reforestation, a forestation and for commercial plantation purpose. Hence the existing method of plant propagation through seed, rhizomes and through cuttings is in sufficient to provide required planting stock. Hence the non-conventional method of plant propagation i.e. plant tissue culture technology is to be adopted for large scale multiplication in shorter duration. To date, very little work has been done for its fast propagation technique.</p><p>The conventional means is only limited to seed sets which take a long time and are limited through rhizome propagation. Efficient in vitro propagation can be a reliable and useful method for establishment of new bamboo plantations and they offer an attractive alternative to conventional methods for mass propagation of bamboo species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref7">7</xref>] . The indiscriminate extraction from natural populations coupled with large-scale habitats loss has seriously endangered the dwarf bamboo (Himalayan Weeping Bamboo) genetic resource. Thus, here was a need to develop its propagation technology through tissue culture technique for rapid and large-scale propagation. In this context, the aim of this study is to develop in vitro micropropagation of Drepanostachyum falcatum through tissue culture.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Plant Material Source</title><p>Explants in the form of nodal segments (2 - 3 cm) were collected from mature field grown clumps of healthy, disease free plants of Drepanostachyum falcatum for axillary bud induction and proliferation. Nodal segments with single axillary buds were used as source material for micropropagation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Explants, Media Preparation and Culture Initiation</title><p>The axillary buds were first washed with 5% cetrimide solution (ICI Ltd. India) for 5 minutes and then cleaned with ethanol 90% swabbed cotton followed by surface sterilization with 0.1% HgCl<sub>2</sub> solution for 10 - 12 minutes and rinsed 3 - 4 times with sterilized distilled water. The surface sterilized axillary buds were cultured on semi-solid and liquid MS (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) medium supplemented with different concentrations of cytokinin (0.0 - 10.0 mg/l BAP/KIN) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref8">8</xref>] . The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.6 prior to autoclaving the medium at 121˚C for 15 minutes. Cultures were maintained at 25˚C &#177; 2˚C temperature with 16 hours illumination with a photon flux density of 2500 lux from white fluorescent tubes (Philips, India).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Establishment and Multiplication of Shoot Cultures</title><p>Axillary buds cultured on liquid and semisolid MS medium supplemented with cytokinin, proliferated number of axillary shoots. These axillary shoots were excised and sub-cultured on fresh liquid as well as semisolid MS medium for further shoot multiplication. In 3 - 4 weeks these shoots were further multiplied and cut into shoot clusters of 3 - 6 shoots and were again subcultured on semi-solid MS medium supplemented with 0.0 - 5.5 mg/l BAP/KIN. These subcultured shoots were multiplied after every 3 - 4 weeks. Different sets of experiments were conducted to obtain maximum shoot multiplication rate. For this, multiplied shoots were subcultured in propagules consisting of 1 to 6 shoots. Observations were recorded after an interval of 4 - 5 weeks. The number of propagule cultured and number of propagule derived at the end of subculture gave the multiplication rate.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Rooting, Hardening and Acclimatization</title><p>The in vitro regenerated shoots (2 - 3 cm long) produced were cultured on MS medium containing various concentrations of auxins 1.5 - 9.5 mg/l IBA/NAA in the medium for root induction. Three propagules (Shoot clusters of different sizes of shoots) were cultured per conical flask (100 - 150 ml). Rooting response was recorded in terms of rooting percentage, average number of roots produced and average root length.</p><p>Rooted shoots from four week old cultures were transferred to soil under shade house either directly or after in vitro hardening the plantlets were taken out from the flasks, washed to remove adhered agar and then transferred to autoclaved 250 ml screw cap glass bottle containing 1/3 volume of autoclaved vermiculite. These plantlets were supplied with half strength MS solution (without organics) thrice a week for two weeks. After two weeks, these bottles were shifted to mist chamber having relative humidity of 60% - 80% with a temperature of 35˚C &#177; 2˚C. The caps of bottles were removed and plantlets were allowed to remain in the bottle for 3 - 4 days before they were transferred to polyethylene pots containing a mixture of sand, farmyard manure and soil. In the mist chamber, the plants were kept for four weeks and were irrigated with half strength MS medium. Later, these polyethylene pots were shifted to green house for acclimatization and kept for two months. After one month in shade house the plants were transferred to polyethylene pots containing same soil composition.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>Data collected was analyzed using CRD design of experiments as it is one of the most widely used design in case of tissue culture experiments (controlled set of conditions and for homogenous materials) and gives best result. Degree of variations was shown by standard error and critical difference at 5%. Significance level was tested at 1%, 0.5% and 0.1% level.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Culture Establishment, Shoot Formation and Shoot Multiplication</title><p>In Drepanostachyum falcatum incorporation of BAP into the medium was found to improve the incidence of bud break and promoted multiple shoot formation. Maximum bud break (90% - 95%) in D. falcatum was obtained on MS medium supplemented with 4.5 mg/l BAP. The explant response cultured in MS media supplemented with BAP and KIN are shown in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). These results are in line with those of other workers, indicating the efficiency of BAP for shoot culture initiation and multiplication in several bamboos. Similar results with BAP were also reported in different species of bamboo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref9">9</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref13">13</xref>] . Ramanayake and Yakandwala [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref14">14</xref>] used 2.0 mg/l BAP + 0.1 mg/l Kn in D. giganteus. Though in present study BAP when used alone gave better bud break as compared to BAP and Kn used. Hirimburegama and Gamage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref15">15</xref>] found cytokinin to be essential for bud break. Huang and Huang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref16">16</xref>] used 4.44 μM BAP for initiation of cultures of Bambusa ventricosa.</p><p>MS medium proved to be the best medium for the establishment of shoot cultures in bamboos. In earlier reports on bamboos MS medium has been successfully used for shoot initiation and establishment of bamboo cultures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref18">18</xref>] . In bamboos bud proliferation and induction was better in liquid medium as compared to semisolid medium. Similar results have been reported in other bamboos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref19">19</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Shoot multiplication is the major criterion for successful commercial micropropagation. Cytokinins are essential for axillary bud proliferation and shoot multiplication in bamboos. A high rate of shoot multiplication was obtained due to BAP in the medium, which stimulated the growth of multiple shoots during shoot multiplication cycle. In Drepanostachyum falcatum, 7 - 9 fold shoot multiplication was achieved on MS medium supplemented with 3.5 mg/l BAP (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(c), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(d)). These results are supported by earlier reports on in vitro propagation of bamboos, where BAP had invariably been used for shoot multiplication [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref11">11</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref18">18</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref22">22</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Shoot multiplication rates obtained for bamboo species (D. falcatum) on Kn supplemented medium was lower</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of plant hormones, cytokinin BAP/KIN in MS medium on axillary bud induction from nodal segments of Drepanostachyum falcatum after 35 days of culture</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Hormone Concentration (mg/l)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Response %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Shoot Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Shoot Length (cm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.33 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25 &#177; 0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.61 &#177; 0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.00 &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.78 &#177; 0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.75 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.15 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98 &#177; 0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.70 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.08 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99 &#177; 0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.25 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.08 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85 &#177; 0.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.80 &#177; 0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.90 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60 &#177; 0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.25 &#177; 0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KIN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.16 &#177; 0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92 &#177; 0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.49 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.31 &#177; 0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.31 &#177; 0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.31 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.00 &#177; 0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96 &#177; 0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.73 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.97 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92 &#177; 0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.56 &#177; 0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.22 &#177; 0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.10 &#177; 0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.86 &#177; 0.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Direct plant regeneration of in vitro cultured Drepanostachyum falcatum. Mother plant of D. falcatum at FRI campus (a); Axillary shoot proliferation in Drepanostachyum falcatum on MS + 4.5 mg/l BAP supplemented medium (b); In vitro shoot multiplication in D. faclatum on MS medium supplemented with 3.5 mg/l BAP (c); In vitro shoot multiplication after 4<sup>th</sup> subculture (d); In vitro rooting in Drepanostachyum falcatum on MS + 6.5 mg/l IBA after 4 weeks (e); Hardened and acclimatized in vitro plantlets of D. falcatum in pots in poly house (f) (g)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2602714x6.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of cytokinins (BAP/KIN) in MS medium on shoot multiplication rate. Data recorded after 4 weeks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Plant Hormone Concentration (mg/l)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mean Shoot Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Shoot Length (cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Multiplication Rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BAP</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.08 &#177; 0.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.55 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.52 &#177; 0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.89 &#177; 0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.00 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47 &#177; 0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >23.00 &#177; 0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.98 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 &#177; 0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >41.49 &#177; 0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.15 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.87 &#177; 0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >37.89 &#177; 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.29 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.96 &#177; 0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >29.81 &#177; 0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.20 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.69 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KIN</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.33 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.76 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83 &#177; 0.08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.56 &#177; 0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.96 &#177; 0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.14 &#177; 0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34.96 &#177; 0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.53 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.72 &#177; 0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >29.05 &#177; 0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.95 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.50 &#177; 0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >23.40 &#177; 0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.10 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10 &#177; 0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.21 &#177; 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.76 &#177; 0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46 &#177; 0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>than the shoot multiplication rates obtained on BAP supplemented medium. Nadgir et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref28">28</xref>] , Das and Rout [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref9">9</xref>] also reported reduced multiplication on Kn supplemented medium. Superiority of BAP over Kn has been reported and discussed in relation to shoot multiplication of trees [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref29">29</xref>] . Bhati et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref30">30</xref>] also reported BAP to be more superior than Kn for shoot differentiation and proliferation in Aegle marmelos. Similar results have also been obtained in case of Prunus serotina [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref31">31</xref>] and Syzygium cuminii [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref32">32</xref>] . Arya and Sharma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref10">10</xref>] obtained 5 fold multiplication by subculturing after 4 weeks in Bambusa bambos. Bag et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref18">18</xref>] reported 6 - 11 fold shoot multiplication after 8 weeks of subculturing. Arya et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref13">13</xref>] reported 5 fold shoot multiplication in Dendrocalamus giganteus after every 4 weeks of subculturing. The earlier reports on micropropagation of bamboo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref33">33</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref36">36</xref>] involved a callus phase which may lead to genetically aberrant plants.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Formation of Roots and Acclimatization</title><p>In D. falcatum the shoots obtained from axillary bud and multiplied enormously were successfully rooted. The ability of plant tissue to form roots depends on interaction of many endogenous and exogenous factors. During the studies on D. falcatum, it was recorded that the shoot multiplication was obtained in medium with cytokinins alone. These shoots were rooted on auxin supplemented (IBA and NAA) MS medium, where they produced roots. These shoots also showed simultaneous shoot elongation, which is due to “cytokinin-carry over effect” in the shoots. A varied effect of auxins (IBA, NAA) was observed by incorporating them in MS medium at different concentration (1.5 mg/l - 9.5 mg/l) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The best results obtained in Drepanostachyum falcatum where 100% rooting was achieved on MS medium supplemented with 6.5 mg/l IBA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(e)). In the present case full strength MS medium with auxin yielded best rooting response. Effective role of IBA in bamboos for rooting has also been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref37">37</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>In present case 90% - 95% survival of plantlets was observed after their hardening and acclimatization. Hardened and acclimatized in vitro plantlets of D. falcatum in pots in polyhouse (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(f), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(g)) for 1 - 2 months before their field transplantation that improved the survival percentage of plants in the field. So far, only 80% - 90% of transplantation success is reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref22">22</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref39">39</xref>] . Use of vermiculite or soilrite like inert substance for hardening has been reported by many workers in bamboos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref37">37</xref>] . Vermiculite is an inert material and absorbs large quantity of water. It has a relatively high cation exchange capacity and thus can hold the nutrients in reserve and later release them. It contains enough magnesium and potassium to supply most of plants. Rooted plantlets were shifted to sand: soil: FYM mixture for hardening and enriched with 1/2 &#215; nutrient solution for few weeks and is reported in bamboos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref39">39</xref>] . Acclimatization and hardening depends on the relative humidity and temperature therefore misting is preferred which maintains temperature of 30˚C and relative humidity of 80% - 85%. It has been reported by many workers that survival percentage</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Effect of auxins IBA/NAA on rooting of in vitro shoots in MS medium. Data recorded after 4 - 5 weeks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Plant Hormone Concentration (mg/l)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Response %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Root Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean Root Length (cm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IBA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.81 &#177; 0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16 &#177; 0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29 &#177; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.81 &#177; 0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.00 &#177; 0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.28 &#177; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.64 &#177; 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62 &#177; 0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.00 &#177; 0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.34 &#177; 0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.00 &#177; 0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.16 &#177; 0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 &#177; 0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.62 &#177; 0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.43 &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.96 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NAA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.00 &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.00 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.13 &#177; 0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.14 &#177; 0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.13 &#177; 0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.16 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.14 &#177; 0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.63 &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35 &#177; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.00 &#177; 0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.15 &#177; 0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72 &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.48 &#177; 0.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.31 &#177; 0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65 &#177; 0.03</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>increases if the plants are transplanted to soil in rainy season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.68068-ref12">12</xref>] . Hardened and acclimatized plants on transfer to field conditions survived and grew to normal plants.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The present investigation was undertaken to develop appropriate tissue culture technology as a non-conventional method for mass multiplication of economically important bamboo Drepanostachyum falcatum. MS culture medium supplemented with 3.5 mg/L BAP gave the highest rate of shoot multiplication using nodal explants. The highest rate of rooting was obtained with 6.5 mg/L IBA. The obtained plantlets of D. falcatum survived and grew normally in polyhouse.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Himanshu Saini,Inder Dev Arya,Sarita Arya,Reetu Sharma, (2016) In Vitro Micropropagation of Himalayan Weeping Bamboo, Drepanostachyum falcatum. American Journal of Plant Sciences,07,1317-1324. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2016.79126</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.68068-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kapur, S.K. (1991) Economically Useful Plants of Majauri-Kirchi Forest Tract (Jammu and Kashmir). Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 14, 534.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uniyal, S. and Awasthi, A. (2000) Bamboos: Their Distribution and Biomass in Bhagirathi Catchment, Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry, 4, 490-495.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naithani, H.B. and Chandra, S. (1998) Gregarious Flowering of a Bamboo (Drepanostachyum falcatum). Indian Forester, 8, 663-666.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kondas</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1982</year>)<article-title>Bamboo Biology, Culm Potential and Problems of Cultivation</article-title><source> Indian Forester</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 179</fpage>-<lpage>188</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rao, I.V.R. and Rao, I.U. (1988) In: Bamboo current Research. In: Rao, I.V.R., Gnanaharan, R. and Cherla, B.S. (Eds.), Proc. International Bamboo Workshop, FRI, Kerala &amp; IDRC, Canada, 151.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, I.D. and Arya, S. (1996) Introduction, Mass Multiplication and Establishment of Edible Bamboo Dendrocalamus asper in India. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 1, 115-121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, I.D. and Arya, S. (1997) In Vitro Culture and Establishment of Exotic Bamboo Dendrocalamus asper. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 35, 1252-1255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Murashige, T. and Skoog, F. (1962) A Revised Medium for Rapid Growth and Bio Assay with Tobacco Tissue Culture. Physiologia Plantarum, 15, 473-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Das, P. and Rout, G.R. (1994) Analysis of Current Methods and Approaches on the Micropropagation of Bamboo. Biological Sciences, 3, 235-246.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, S. and Sharma, S. (1998) Micropropagation Technology of Bambusa bambos through Shoot Proliferation. Indian Forester, 9, 725-731.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramanayke, S.M.S.D., Wanniarachchi, W.A.V.R. and Tennakoon, T.M.A. (2001) Axillary Shoot Proliferation and in Vitro Flowering in an Adult Giant Bamboo, Dendrocalamus giganteus Wall. Ex Munro. In Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology-Plant, 37, 667-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11627-001-0116-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, S., Satsangi, R. and Arya, I.D. (2002) Rapid Mass Multiplication of Edible Bamboo Dendrocalamus asper. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 14, 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J091v14n02_06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, S., Rana, P.K., Sharma, R. and Arya, I.D. (2006) Tissue Culture Technology for Rapid Multiplication of Dendrocalamus giganteus Munro. Indian Forester, 3, 345-357.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramanayke, S.M.S.D. and Yakandwala, K. (1997) Micropropagation of the Giant Bamboo (Dendrocalamus giganteus (Munro) from Nodal Explants of Field-Grown Culm. Plant Science, 129, 213-223.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00185-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirimburegama, K. and Gamage, N. (1995) Propagation of Bambusa vulgaris (Yellow Bamboo) through Nodal Bud Culture. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 3, 469-475.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1995.11515317</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, L.C. and Huang, B.L. (1995) Loss of the Species Distinguishing Trait among Regenerated Bambusa ventricosa McClure Plants. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 42, 109-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00037688</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prutpongse, P. and Gavinlertvatana, P. (1992) In Vitro Micropropagation of 54 Species from 15 Genera of Bamboo. Horticultural Science, 27, 453-454.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bag, N., Chandra, S., Palni, L.M.S. and Nandi, S.K. (2000) Micropropagation of Dev-Ringal [Thamnocalamus spathiflorus (Trin.) Munro]—A Temperate Bamboo, and Comparison between in Vitro Propagated Plants and Seedlings. Plant Science, 156, 125-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00212-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saxena, S. (1990) In Vitro Propagation of Bamboo (Bambusa tulda Roxb.) through Shoot Propagation. Plant Cell Reports, 9, 431-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00232266</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sood, A., Sharma, O.P. and Palni, L.M.S. (1992) Improved Methods of Propagation of Maggar Bamboo. (Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Nees et Arn. ex Munro) Using Single Node Cutting Taken from Juvenile Culms of Elite Seedlings. The Journal of the American Bamboo Society, 182, 17-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mrudul, V., Shirgurkar, S., Thengane, R., Insiya, S., Poonawala, J., Nadgauda, R.S. and Mascarenhas, A.F. (1996) A Simple in Vitro Method of Propagation and Rhizome Formation in Dendrocalamus strictus Nees. Current Science, 10, 940-943.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chambers, S.M., Heuch, J.H.R. and Pirrie, A. (1991) Micropropagation and in Vitro Flowering of the Bamboo Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Munro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 27, 45-48.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00048205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mudoi, K.D. and Borthakur, M. (2009) In Vitro Micropropagation of Bambusa balcooa Roxb. through Nodal Explants from Field Grown Culms and Scope for Upscaling. Current Science, 7, 962-966. http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Negi, D. and Saxena, S. (2011) Micropropagation of Bambusa balcooa Roxb. through Axillary Shoot Proliferation. In Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology—Plant, 5, 604-610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11627-011-9403-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, I.D., Kaur, B. and Arya, S. (2012) Rapid and Mass Propagation of Economically Important Bamboo Dendrocalamus hamiltonii. Indian Journal of Energy, 1, 11-16.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mudoi, K.D., Saikia, S.P., Goswami, A., Gogoi, A., Bora, D. and Borthakur, M. (2013) Micropropagation of Important Bamboos: A Review. African Journal of Biotechnology, 20, 2770-2785. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waikhom, S.D. and Louis, B. (2014) An Effective Protocol for Micropropagation of Edible Bamboo Species Bambusa tulda and Melocanna baccifera through Nodal Culture. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, Article ID: 345794.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/345794</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadgir, A.L., Phadke, C.H., Gupta, P.K., Parasharami, V.A., Nair, S. and Mascarenhas, A.F. (1984) Rapid Multiplication of Bamboo by Tissue Culture. Silvae Genetica, 6, 219-233.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonga, J.M. and Von Aderkas, P. (1992) In Vitro Culture of Trees. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 43.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8058-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhati, R., Shekhawat, N.S. and Arya, H.C. (1992) In Vitro Regeneration of Plantlets from Root Segments of Aegle marmelos. Indian Journal of American Biology, 844-845.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tricoli, D.M., Maynard, C.A. and Drew, A.P. (1985) Tissue Culture Propagation of Mature Trees of Prunus serotina Ehrh. I. Establishment, Multiplication and Rooting in Vitro. Forest Science, 31, 201-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yadav, U., Lal., M. and Jaiswal, V.S. (1990) In Vitro Micropropagation of the Tropical Fruit Tree Syzygium cuminii L. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 21, 87-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00034498</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yeh, M.L. and Chang, W.C. (1986) Plant Regeneration through Somatic Embryogenesis in Callus Culture of Green Bamboo (Bambusa oldhamii). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 73, 161-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00289269</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yeh, M.L. and Chang, W.C. (1987) Plant Regeneration via Somatic Embryogenesis in Mature Embryo Derived Callus Cultures of Sinocalamus latiflora (Munro) McClure. Plant Science, 51, 93-96.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(87)90224-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, L.C., Huang, B.L. and Chang, W.L. (1989) Tissue Culture Investigations of Bamboo—IV. Organogenesis Leading to Adventitious Shoots and Plants in Excised Shoot Apices. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 29, 307-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(89)90004-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramanayke, S.M.S.D. and Wanniarachchi, W.A.V.R. (2003) Organogenesis in Callus Derived from an Adult Giant Bamboo (Dendrocalamus giganteus Wall. ex Munro). Scientia Horticulturae, 98, 195-200.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00204-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yashodha, R., Sumathi, R., Mallinga, P. and Gurumurthi, K. (1997) Genetic Enhancement and Mass Production of Quality Propagules of Bambusa nutans and Dendrocalamus membranaceus. Indian Forester, 4, 303-306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rathore, S. and Ravishankar Rai, V. (2005) Micropropagation of Pseudoxytenanthera stocksii Munro. In Vitro Cellular &amp; Developmental Biology—Plant, 3, 333-337.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.68068-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arya, S., Sharma, S., Kaur, R. and Arya, I.D. (1999) Micropropagation of Dendrocalamus asper by Shoot Proliferation Using Seeds. Plant Cell Reports, 18, 879-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002990050678</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>