<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCDSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-4105</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jcdsa.2016.64015</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JCDSA-67899</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Objective and Self-Perceived Facial Skin Status Using Whitening Efficacy of Cosmetic Products on Taiwanese Women
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hsin-Tung</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gwo-Shing</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Feng-Lin</surname><given-names>Yen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kuan-Nien</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Kaohsiung Medical University, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Fiona International Limited, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>wc@kmu.edu.tw(KC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>123</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>27</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Tranexamic acid and vitamin C derivatives are important reagent used in cosmetic skin-whitening products. Recently, self-perceptions regarding improvement in facial skin status have been increasingly recognized as an important outcome of whitening cosmetic products intervention. Aims: The purpose of the study was to determine the receptiveness of objective and self-perceived facial skin status using whitening cosmetic products. Methods: A total of 40 volunteers were photographed using the Visia
  
  <sup>?</sup>
  
   
  machine and completed questionnaires at pre- and post-operation (8 weeks after receiving whitening cosmetic products). Visia<sup>?</sup> 
  digital image analysis and questionnaires were used for assessment of facial skin status. The receptiveness of objective and self-perceived measures was assessed by paired t test and Effect Size (ES). Results: There were progresses with regard to the surface spot (ES = 0.22), wrinkles (ES = 0.24), texture (ES = 0.31) and pores (ES = 0.21) after using cosmetic products with tranexamic acid. For self-perceived measures, there were significant progresses in pigmented spots (ES = 0.75), rough complexion (ES = 0.76), red complexion (ES = 0.41), wrinkle (ES = 0.58) and obvious pores (ES = 0.75). Conclusions: This study suggests that the whitening cosmetic products are associated with improvement of objective and self-perceived facial skin status. The results could be provided as available information for cosmetic investigation. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Whitening</kwd><kwd> Self-Perceived</kwd><kwd> Objective</kwd><kwd> Cosmetic</kwd><kwd> Facial Skin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Several whitening agents such as hydroquinone, etinoic acid, tranexamic acid, vitamin C derivatives, 4-n-buty- lresorcinol, a-hydroxy acid and niacinamide have been used in cosmetic products but sometimes with side-effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref4">4</xref>] . Furthermore, tranexamic acid is effective on the skin in healing of wounds and has whitening effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref8">8</xref>] . Particularly, vitamin C derivatives such as sodium ascorbyl phosphate have been found antioxidant and anti-aging effects and can be used in many kinds of cosmetics. Examples for vitamin C derivatives and tranexamic acid in cosmetics products are skin-whitening lotions, creams, milky lotions, facial packs and scalp care cosmetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref9">9</xref>] . Sensitive detection and determination of tranexamic acid is thus of interest not only in cosmetics but also in clinical and pharmaceutical samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Reviewing the literature, Visia<sup>&#174;</sup> digital image analysis machine is commonly to evaluate objective assessments of facial skin status after several related clinical facial treatments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref18">18</xref>] . In addition, participants’ perceptions regarding improvements in facial skin status are increasingly recognized as an important outcome of cosmetic products intervention. There are limited studies observed both changes of objective and self-perceived assessments in whitening cosmetic products intervention.</p><p>The aim of this study was therefore to assess the receptiveness of the objective and self-perceived facial skin status using whitening cosmetic products by Taiwanese female adults.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>There are many methods to assess the efficiency of whitening or spot-removing materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref14">14</xref>] . Visia<sup>&#174;</sup> digital image analysis machine is a common and validated clinical image machine used to evaluated objective assessments of facial skin in clinical facial treatments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref18">18</xref>] . The study selected this machine to assess objective measures for facial skin status. The self-perceptions regarding improvements in facial skin status have been increasingly recognized as an important outcome for cosmetic products intervention. There is limited study observed changes of self-perceived assessments in cosmetic products. Our study developed five questions to assess the severity of self-perceived facial skin status contrast to aspects of objective facial skin status assessed by the Visia<sup>&#174;</sup> machine. Additionally, the self-perceived questionnaire was assessed to be a reliable (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.82) and valid measurement in this study.</p><p>This longitudinal study collected 40 volunteers aged 30 - 65 years working in the Kaohsiung Medical University or Kaoshiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, presenting with pigmented spots, dyschromia or pigmentary disorders caused by solar exposure such as melasma and/or lentigo senilis, but not ephelides, nevus spilus or lentigo simplex, were recruited in the study. Persons on long-term treatment with anti-histamines, steroids or beta-blockers, and having a skin disease of the face, were excluded.</p><p>The use of cosmetic products except the exposure to sunlight (natural or artificial) in excess of habitual exposure was prohibited during the 8 weeks preceding and during the study period.</p><p>Participants accepted a bottle of whitening cosmetic product. They were photographed using the Visia<sup>&#174;</sup> machine and completed questionnaires at pre- and post-operation (approximately 8 weeks after receiving cosmetic products). For safety reasons, if there was any uncomfortableness caused by the cosmetic product, the participant was allowed unconditionally to quit the job in the study.</p><p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Human Experiment and Ethics Committee, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, MUH-IRB-20130176).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Ingredients of Whitening Products</title><p>Contains active of the whitening serum is included tranexamic acid 2.5%, Sodium ascorbyl phosphate 0.5%, glutathione 0.005% and Hyaluronic acid 0.5%. The serum (60 ml) was pumped once to apply as regular serum every morning and evening during the study period (8 weeks).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Clinical Evaluation</title><p>On pre- and post-visits the face of the volunteer was photographed using a digital image analysis machine with polarized light (Visia<sup>&#174;</sup>, Canfield Imaging System - Fairfield, EUA). Intent on capturing five skin properties (surface spot, red area, wrinkles, texture and pores), the objective of this study, we used the photographic image obtained with the ultraviolet lamp of the machine. Photographs were taken as proofs with the facing forward, 45˚ to the right and 45˚ to the left, combining all the facial regions analyzed for the presentation of results. The variables studied were count (number) of the five skin properties, as determined by the machine.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Questionnaire Survey</title><p>Five questions were developed to assess the severity of facial skin status contrast to aspects of objective facial skin status determined by the Visia<sup>&#174;</sup> machine, and it is validated by cosmetic experts and dermatologists. Participants were asked how severely they had facial skin problems (pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores) at pre- and post-operation. Each question was calculated on 5-point severity scores (1 - 5). More serious problem was indicated by higher scores.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The statistical analysis of the study was conducted by using the software SAS<sup>&#174;</sup>9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) .</p><p>Internal consistency (reliability) was assessed for the self-perceived facial skin status questionnaire by Cronbach’s alpha. The paired t test was used to evaluate mean changes in objective and self-perceived outcome measures with respect to cosmetic products intervention. Cohen’s standardized Effect Size (ES) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref19">19</xref>] , calculated by dividing the mean of the difference in pre- and post-operative scores by the standard deviation of the pre-treatment score, was computed to evaluate the receptiveness of different measurements. ES could be considered as several levels of clinical meaningfulness (small: 0.2 ≤ ES &lt; 0.5; moderate: 0.5 ≤ ES &lt; 0.8; large: 0.8 ≤ ES).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result</title><p>A total of 40 aged from 30 - 65 years were recruited. Each participant completed both pre- and post-question- naires, and received cosmetic products with tranexamic acid (60 ml).</p><p>For objective evaluation, receptiveness of facial skin status assessed on cosmetic products intervention was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. In general, there were significant differences between numbers of surface spot, wrinkles,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Receptiveness of objective facial skin status using whitening cosmetic products for Taiwanese female (n = 40)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Baseline</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >After 8 weeks</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Observed effect</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Paired t test p-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Effect Size (ES)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(SD)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total, n = 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surface spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(14.67)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(14.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(6.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(7.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(6.75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0479</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >476.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(255.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(212.42)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(132.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(105.72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(92.52)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(42.58)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0019</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(26.90)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(33.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(32.97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9975</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 50 years, n = 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surface spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(14.34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(14.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5.61)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(6.27)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5.07)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7452</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >364.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(165.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(186.62)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(69.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2081</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(102.77)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >207.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(97.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(22.72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >111.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(28.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(24.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(20.37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3927</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 65 years, n = 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surface spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(13.88)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(12.10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(6.89)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0280</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkles</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(7.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(6.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5.47)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0013</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >662.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(273.34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >483.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(231.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(152.62)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(92.13)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >239.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(82.35)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(49.32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(23.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(42.34)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-5.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(47.49)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>texture, pores with regard to pre- and post-operation (paired t test p-values: 0.0016, 0.0479, 0.0006 and 0.0019 respectively). The mean change in numbers of surface spot, wrinkles and pores were 3.28, 1.92 and 22.41 from pre- operation to post-operation. Numbers of texture had the largest mean observed change (78.66). In addition, the effect size (ES) of the surface spot, wrinkles, texture and pores were 0.22, 0.24, 0.31 and 0.21, all effect size were above 0.20 showed at least a small improvement. Among 30 - 50 years participants (n = 25), there was only significant difference in numbers of surface spot with regard to pre- and post-operation (paired t test p-values: 0.0278). The ES of the surface spot was 0.18. For 50 - 65 years participants (n = 15), there were significant differences between numbers of surface spot, wrinkles, texture, pores with regard to pre- and post-operation (paired t test p-values: 0.0280, 0.0013, 0.0004 and 0.0008 respectively). The ES of the surface spot, wrinkles, texture and pores were 0.31, 0.73, 0.66 and 0.59, all effect size were above 0.50 showed at least a moderate improvement except ES of surface spot.</p><p>The internal consistency analysis of the questionnaire resulted in a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82. Alpha value decreased when any item was deleted. Considering item-total correlations, all items were above 0.50 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>In terms of self-perceived assessment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>), receptiveness of self-perceived facial skin status using whitening cosmetic products was showed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. In general, there were significant differences between pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores with regard to pre- and post-operation (paired</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Internal consistency reliability of self-perceived facial skin status questionnaire</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Items</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item-total correlation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Alpha if item deleted</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pigmented spots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rough complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obvious pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Receptiveness of self-perceived facial skin status using whitening cosmetic products for Taiwanese female (n = 40)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Baseline</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >After 8 weeks</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Observed effect</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Paired t test p-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Effect Size (ES)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(SD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(SD)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total, n = 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pigmented spots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.93)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.54)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rough complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.85)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.86)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.14)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.83)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.22)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0183</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.95)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.81)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obvious pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.04)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 - 50 years, n = 25</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pigmented spots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.88</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rough complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.76)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.82)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.08)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.05)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.56)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.87)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obvious pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.91)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.90)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50 - 65 years, n = 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pigmented spots</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.62)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.83)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rough complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.62)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.03)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Red complexion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.11)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.80)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3047</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Wrinkle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.76)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.74)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.70</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obvious pores</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.21)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(0.64)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1.45)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0961</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>t test p-values: &lt;0.0001, &lt;0.0001, 0.0183, 0.0001 and &lt;0.0001 respectively). The mean change in pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores were 0.70, 0.65, 0.48, 0.55 and 0.78 from pre- operation to post- operation. Moreover, the ES of the pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores were 0.75, 0.76, 0.41, 0.58 and 0.75, all effect size were above 0.50 showed at least a moderate improvement except ES of red complexion. Among 30 - 50 years participants, there were significant differences between pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores with regard to pre- and post-operation (paired t test p-values: &lt;0.0001, 0.0006, 0.0247, 0.0037 and &lt;0.0001 respectively). The ES of the pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores were 0.88, 0.81, 0.46, 0.53 and 0.92. Particularly, the ES of pigmented spots, rough complexion and obvious pores were above 0.80 showed at least a large improvement. For 50 - 65 years participants (n = 15), there also were significant differences between pigmented spots, rough complexion and wrinkle with regard to pre- and post-operation (paired t test p-values: 0.0266, 0.0156 and 0.0148 respectively). The ES of the pigmented spots, rough complexion and wrinkle were 0.56, 0.72 and 0.70, and they were above 0.50 showed at least a moderate improvement except ES of surface spot.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Limited studies have followed longitudinally the receptiveness of objective and self-perceived facial skin status using cosmetic products. In the present study, there were improvements not only in surface spot, wrinkles, texture and pores facial skin status, but also in self-perceived pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores facial skin problems after using whitening cosmetic products.</p><p>It has recently been proposed that tranexamic acid is not only a synthetic antifibrinolytic agent but also a whitening ingredient in cosmetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref20">20</xref>] . In addition, antioxidants are becoming increasingly important in whitening cosmetics according to their anti-inflammatory effects. Particularly, 3% sodium ascorbyl phosphate is a stable antioxidants in a cosmetic oil-in-water emulsion and enable a good release of the active agent in vitro as a precondition for a high efficacy in vivo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref22">22</xref>] . In present study, the whitening efficacy products contains both tranexamic acid and sodium ascorbyl phosphate active ingredients were provided participants, and then observing the changes in self-perceived and objective facial skin status.</p><p>There is recent information regarding the investigation into the effect of vitamin C derivatives and tranexamic acid in cosmetic products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67899-ref3">3</xref>] . In this study, the surface spot, wrinkles, texture and pores were significant improvements after using whitening cosmetic products. However, red facial skin wasn’t proven improved. Compared with younger participants (30 - 50 years), older participants (&gt;50 years) had lager changes in aspects of wrinkles, texture and pores because their facial skin were worse at baseline. For self- perception, participants also felt that aspects of pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores problems were improved, in, particular, the improvements in pigmented spots, rough complexion, and obvious pores problems were larger. Compared with older participants (&gt;50 years), younger participants (30 - 50 years) had more self-perceived improved aspects of facial skin status such as red skin and obvious pores problems. Maybe younger females pay more attention to their appearance, and further they feel more changes in their facial skin. The results of our study could be provided as available information for cosmetic investigations.</p><p>This study had a limitation. There was no control group in this follow-up study, and hence the receptiveness cannot be considered as effectiveness for whitening cosmetic products in objective and self-perceived facial skin status. Therefore, future research may be required to explore effectiveness of whitening cosmetic products in self-perceived outcomes.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>It was found in the study that whitening cosmetic products could improve surface spots, wrinkles, texture and pores facial skin status. In terms of participants’ self-perceived facial skin status, there were also significant improvements in aspects of pigmented spots, rough complexion, red complexion, wrinkle and obvious pores. People at different age levels could feel about how the products help their facial skin in different ways. These results are relevant for cosmetic experts and dermatologists who wish to draw on scientific evidence about the benefits of cosmetic products when advising consumers about whether or not the products will improve their facial skin status.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>All authors have made substantive contribution to this study, and all have reviewed the final paper prior to its submission.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hsin-Tung Lin,Gwo-Shing Chen,Feng-Lin Yen,Kuan-Nien Chen, (2016) Objective and Self-Perceived Facial Skin Status Using Whitening Efficacy of Cosmetic Products on Taiwanese Women. Journal of Cosmetics, Dermatological Sciences and Applications,06,117-123. doi: 10.4236/jcdsa.2016.64015</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67899-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haddad, A.L., Matos, L.F., Brunstein, F., et al. (2003) A Clinical, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing Skin Whitening Complex with Hydroquinone vs. Placebo in the Treatment of Melasma. International Journal of Dermatology, 42, 153-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2003.01621.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Griffiths, C.E., Finkel, L.J., Ditre, C.M., et al. (1993) Topical Tretinoin (Retinoic Acid) Improves Melasma. A Vehicle-Controlled, Clinical Trial. British Journal of Dermatology, 129, 415-421.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb03169.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tadokoro, T., Bonte, F., Archambault, J.C., et al. (2010) Whitening Efficacy of Plant Extracts Including Orchid Extracts on Japanese Female Skin with Melasma and Lentigo Senilis. The Journal of Dermatology, 37, 522-530.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00897.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Son, K.H. and Heo, M.Y. (2013) The Evaluation of Depigmenting Efficacy in the Skin for the Development of New Whitening Agents in Korea. International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 35, 9-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ics.12012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCormack, P.L. (2012) Tranexamic Acid: A Review of Its Use in the Treatment of Hyperfibrinolysis. Drugs, 72, 585-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/11209070-000000000-00000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shih, Y., Wu, K.L., Sue, J.W., et al. (2008) Determination of Tranexamic Acid in Cosmetic Products by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Barrel Plating Nickel Electrode. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 48, 1446-1450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2008.09.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manosroi, A., Podjanasoonthon, K. and Manosroi, J. (2002) Stability and Release of Topical Tranexamic Acid Liposome Formulations. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 53, 375-386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duangrat, C., Wongsri, K. and Pongpaibul, Y. (2007) Spectrofluorimetric Determination of Tranexamic Acid in Hydrogel Patch Formulations by Derivatization with Naphthalene-2,3-Dicarboxaldehyde/Cyanide. Journal of Cosmetic Science, 58, 215-227.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tse, T.W. and Hui, E. (2013) Tranexamic Acid: An Important Adjuvant in the Treatment of Melasma. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 12, 57-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Budamakuntla, L., Loganathan, E., Suresh, D.H., et al. (2013) A Randomised, Open-label, Comparative Study of Tranexamic Acid Microinjections and Tranexamic Acid with Microneedling in Patients with Melasma. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 6, 139-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.118403</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cho, H.H., Choi, M., Cho, S., et al. (2013) Role of Oral Tranexamic Acid in Melasma Patients Treated with IPL and Low Fluence QS Nd: YAG Laser. The Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 24, 292-296.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2011.643220</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kulick, M.I. and Gajjar, N.A. (2007) Analysis of Histologic and Clinical Changes Associated with Polaris WR Treatment of Facial Wrinkles. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 27, 32-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2006.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa, A., Moises, T.A., Cordero, T., et al. (2010) Association of Emblica, Licorice and Belides as an Alternative to Hydroquinone in the Clinical Treatment of Melasma. Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 85, 613-620.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962010000500003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Puccetti, G., Nguyen, T. and Stroever, C. (2011) Skin Colorimetric Parameters Involved in Skin Age Perception. Skin Research and Technology, 17, 129-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2010.00480.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, N.P., Shek, S.Y., Yu, C.S., et al. (2011) Safety Study of Transcutaneous Focused Ultrasound for Non-Invasive Skin Tightening in Asians. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 43, 366-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.21070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Herane, M.I., Orlandi, C., Zegpi, E., et al. (2012) Clinical Efficacy of Adapalene (Differin((R))) 0.3% gel in Chilean Women with Cutaneous Photoaging. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 23, 57-64.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09546634.2011.631981</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michaels, B.M., Csank, G.A., Ryb, G.E., et al. (2012) Prospective Randomized Comparison of OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) and AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) in the Treatment of Forehead, Glabellar, and Periorbital Wrinkles. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 32, 96-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11430685</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arjinpathana, N. and Asawanonda, P. (2012) Glutathione as an Oral Whitening Agent: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 23, 97-102.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09546631003801619</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cohen, J. (1992) A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huertas-Perez, J.F., Heger, M., Dekker, H., et al. (2007) Simple, Rapid, and Sensitive Liquid Chromatography-Fluorescence Method for the Quantification of Tranexamic Acid in Blood. Journal of Chromatography A, 1157, 142-150.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.04.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Raschke, T., Koop, U., Dusing, H.J., et al. (2004) Topical Activity of Ascorbic Acid: From in Vitro Optimization to in Vivo Efficacy. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, 17, 200-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000078824</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67899-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, Y., Hoshino, T., Chen, C.J., et al. (2009) The Evaluation of Whitening Efficacy of Cosmetic Products Using a Human Skin Pigmentation Spot Model. Skin Research and Technology, 15, 218-223.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2009.00358.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>