<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-7408</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojoph.2016.62017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJOph-67020</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Glaucoma Awareness and Knowledge, and Attitude to Screening, in a Rural Community in Ebonyi State, Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>E. Ogbonnaya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>L.</surname><given-names>U. Ogbonnaya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>O.</surname><given-names>Okoye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>N.</surname><given-names>Kizor-Akaraiwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Community Medicine, Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu,
Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>05</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>119</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2016</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>28</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Awareness, knowledge, beliefs and the sociocultural and religious practices, are believed to influence the treatment-seeking behavior of people as well as their uptake of services. This study was carried out to assess the awareness and knowledge about glaucoma, and the attitude to glaucoma screening in Nchokko village in Igbeagu community, Izzi Local Government Area, Ebonyi State, Nigeria. This was a cross-sectional descriptive study. Data were collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS 22. Results show that a total of 402 respondents— 228 (56.7%) women and 174 (43.3%) men—were interviewed. The mean age of respondents was 31.7 &#177; 11.9 years; 82.8% of the respondents had secondary education or less; 53% were married; and 38.1% were farmers. Only 21.1% of the respondents were aware of glaucoma. Gender, education, and positive family history were significantly associated with awareness. Only 6.3% of the respondents had good knowledge about the disease. A large proportion of respondents (62.1%) exhibited a positive attitude towards glaucoma screening; however, only 5% had ever undergone glaucoma screening. We conclude that glaucoma awareness and knowledge were poor in this rural community, but a high proportion of respondents had a positive attitude towards glaucoma screening. We therefore recommend a focused community health education campaign that will raise awareness and impart adequate knowledge about glaucoma. Eye care providers should make use of every opportunity to convey information on glaucoma to patients.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Glaucoma Awareness and Knowledge</kwd><kwd> Screening</kwd><kwd> Nchokko-Igbeagu Izzi</kwd><kwd> Ebonyi State</kwd><kwd> Nigeria</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Glaucoma is a disease characterized by atrophy of the optic nerve and progressive loss of vision. It is an important public health problem, being the commonest cause of irreversible blindness in the world [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref2">2</xref>] . In Nigeria, it has been found to be responsible for 16% of the blindness among the population aged 40 years and above [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref3">3</xref>] . Estimates by Quigley and Broman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref2">2</xref>] suggest an increase in the burden of the disease worldwide between the years 2010 and 2020.</p><p>The commonest form of this disease―open-angle glaucoma―usually has an insidious onset, which may explain why most glaucoma patients present late. It has been estimated that more than half of glaucoma patients are already blind in at least one eye at presentation in Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref6">6</xref>] . In Ebonyi State, Ogbonnaya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref6">6</xref>] found that 53% of glaucoma patients were already blind (i.e., best-corrected visual acuity &lt; 3/60) at presentation. Yet, blindness from glaucoma is preventable if detected early and managed appropriately. Early detection and prompt treatment are only achieved by timely eye examinations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Awareness, knowledge, and beliefs regarding diseases, as well as socio-cultural and religious practices, affect the treatment-seeking behavior of people and the uptake of services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref8">8</xref>] . If glaucoma prevention services and treatment programs are available, an informed public is more likely to take advantage of it before significant functional disability or irreversible vision loss occurs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>This study therefore aimed at assessing how glaucoma awareness and knowledge affect attitudes and practices among the population in Nchokko village in Igbeagu community of Izzi Local Government Area (LGA) of Ebonyi State, Nigeria. This information can be of great value when planning health education campaigns related to glaucoma and can benefit other prevention of blindness activities in this population residing in the catchment area covered by our community eye program.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Ebonyi is one of the relatively younger states in Nigeria, having been created out of Enugu and Abia states in 1996. It has a population of approximately 2.4 million people. The Nchokko village Igbeagu Community in Izzi LGA of Ebonyi State was the location of the study. The Igbeagu community is one of the newly created development centers in Izzi LGA. It is about 20 km from Abakaliki, the state capital. Four out of the 25 villages in Izzi LGA make up the development center. All the four villages are served by the Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital Primary Health Care Center. The people of Igbeagu are agrarian, growing mainly root crops, tubers, and grains, especially rice.</p><p>The Igbeagu Development Center was purposively selected for this study; the reasons were as follows:</p><p>・ The Department of Community Medicine of the Ebonyi State University (EBSU) has the development center as its primary health care (PHC) practice area for providing training to resident doctors and medical students.</p><p>・ The Department of Ophthalmology of EBSU also uses the PHC for its community ophthalmology programs.</p><p>・ The study was designed as part of efforts to improve ophthalmic services to this rural area.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Design</title><p>This was a cross-sectional descriptive study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Sample Size and Sampling Technique</title><p>The sample size was calculated using the formula for estimating proportion (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2020211x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>). At α = 0.05 and power of 90%, a minimum sample size of 372 was calculated using P of 41.2% from awareness of glaucoma from a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref9">9</xref>] . Because the total number of adults/adolescents in the community was only 435, the entire population was invited to participate in the study; 402 persons consented.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Study Instrument and Data Collection</title><p>The study instrument was a pretested interviewer-administered questionnaire that elicited information on respondents’ socio-demographic characteristics, awareness of glaucoma, level of knowledge about glaucoma, and attitudes and practices with regard to glaucoma screening. Awareness of glaucoma was defined as “having heard of glaucoma”; respondents were asked if they had ever heard of glaucoma and, if so, what their source of information was. The level of knowledge regarding glaucoma was assessed on the basis of the responses to the following questions:</p><p>1) Glaucoma is a blinding eye disease: Yes/No</p><p>2) Glaucoma often causes high pressure in the eye: Yes/No</p><p>3) Glaucoma can occur without symptoms: Yes/No</p><p>4) Glaucoma runs in families: Yes/No</p><p>5) Old age is a risk factor: Yes/No</p><p>6) High blood pressure is a risk factor: Yes/No</p><p>7) Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor: Yes/No</p><p>8) Black race is a risk factor: Yes/No</p><p>9) White race is a risk factor: Yes/No</p><p>10) Glaucoma is a family curse: Yes/No</p><p>11) Glaucoma results from poor feeding: Yes/No</p><p>12) Glaucoma results from poison: Yes/No</p><p>Each correct answer to the above questions was scored 1 and a wrong answer was scored 0, and the total was used as a measure of the respondent’s overall knowledge regarding glaucoma. A respondent could thus score a maximum of 12 and a minimum of 0. We graded a score of 0 - 5 as “poor knowledge” and a score of 6 - 12 as “good knowledge”.</p><p>To measure attitude to glaucoma screening, respondents were asked if they thought that they needed glaucoma screening. An affirmative response was taken as indicative of a positive attitude to glaucoma screening.</p><p>To measure practice of glaucoma screening, respondents were asked if they had ever had a routine eye examination by an ophthalmologist (as opposed to an eye examination prompted by the presence of some visual symptom). A positive answer was taken as indication that the respondent had undergone glaucoma screening</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Data Management and Analysis</title><p>IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Frequency tables and charts were used for descriptive statistics. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess the relationships between the various socio-demographic variables as independent variables, and glaucoma awareness, glaucoma knowledge, and glaucoma screening practice as dependent variables. The relationship between glaucoma awareness and knowledge as independent variables, and glaucoma screening practice as the dependent variable was also examined. The chi-square test was used to assess the strength of association between these categorical variables. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 for all tests. During data analysis, neutral responses such as “not sure” or undecided were regarded as negative answer.</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Ethical Approval</title><p>Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki. The purpose of the study was adequately explained to members of the community, and refusal of participation by any respondent was respected. All efforts were made to ensure confidentiality of data by removing every personal identifier.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Limitations of the Study</title><p>The selection of the location of this study was purposive, and the village was a small settlement. Despite the fact that Nchokko is typical of the rural villages in Ebonyi State, the results may not be immediately generalizable. Secondly, data on routine eye check are self reports and should be interpreted with caution.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><p>A total of 402 persons―228 (56.7%) women and 174 (43.3%) men―participated in the survey. The mean age of the respondents was 31.7 &#177; 11.9 years (range, 11 - 75 years). The majority 249 (61.9%) were in the age-group of 21 - 40 years. A high proportion (82.8%) had secondary education or less. The commonest religion was Christianity (89.8%). More than half (53%) of the respondents were married, and the majority (38.1%) were farmers. Of the 402 respondents, 10 (2.5%) indicated that they were glaucoma patients, while 63 (15.7%) had a positive family history of blindness. Furthermore, 93 (23.1%) respondents were using spectacles (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gender</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age-group</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 - 60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >165</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No formal education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Religion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Christianity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >African traditional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Islam</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Other</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widower</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Farming</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Civil servant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Businessman/Trader</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Public servant (private sector)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Artisan/Apprentice</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Health worker</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you suffer from glaucoma?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not sure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >317</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive family history of blindness</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >296</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not sure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Glaucoma Awareness</title><p>The majority 317 (78.9%) of respondents had never heard of glaucoma. For the 85 respondents who were aware of glaucoma, the source of information was mostly the mass media for 36 (42.4%) and health facilities for 25 (29.4%) of them. Other sources of information were school 11 (12.9%), friends/relations with glaucoma 5 (5.9%), and other unspecified sources 8 (9.4%).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Knowledge of Symptoms of Glaucoma</title><p>With regard to knowledge of different symptoms of glaucoma, 56 (13.9%) respondents knew that glaucoma is a blinding eye disease, 26 (6.5%) knew that it can occur without symptoms, and 17 (4.2%) knew that glaucoma is associated with high pressure in the eye (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Knowledge of glaucoma</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Frequency</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. Knowledge of symptoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma is a blinding eye disease</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >346</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma occurs without symptoms?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Glaucoma is often associated with high pressure in the eye</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. Knowledge of risk factors</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma is more common among the black race</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma “runs” in families</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Old age is a risk factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not sure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >327</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High blood pressure is a risk factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not sure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >382</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Glaucoma is more common among the ‘white’ race</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >376</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. Overall knowledge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor knowledge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >375</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good knowledge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>With regard to knowledge of risk factors for glaucoma, 51 (12.7%) respondents related glaucoma with old age, 45 (11.2%) knew that glaucoma can “run” in families, 25 (6.2%) knew that high blood pressure is a risk factor, and 20 (5.0%) knew that diabetes mellitus is a risk factor (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Level of Knowledge of Glaucoma</title><p>With regard to overall knowledge of glaucoma, only 27 (6.7%) had good knowledge; the majority (375 respondents; 93.3%) had poor knowledge (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Attitude to Glaucoma Screening</title><p>Generally, 246 respondents (61.2%) affirmed that they needed glaucoma screening; 156 (38.8%) did not think they need screening (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). However, amongst the 85 respondents who were aware of glaucoma, 60 (70.6%) respondents had a positive attitude to glaucoma screening.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Practice of Glaucoma Screening</title><p>Generally, only 58 (14.4%) respondents had ever undergone an eye examination by an ophthalmologist. Out of these, 35 (60.3%) eye examinations were prompted by eye symptoms; only 23 (39.7%) were routine (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Interestingly, all of these 23 were among those aware of glaucoma.</p></sec><sec id="s4_6"><title>4.6. Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on Awareness, Knowledge, and Attitude towards Routine Eye Screening</title><p>Age had no significant influence on glaucoma awareness, overall knowledge, attitude to screening, and practice of glaucoma screening in this community. On the other hand, education had significant influence on glaucoma awareness, with respondents with ≥secondary education being more likely than those with ≤primary education to be aware of glaucoma (X<sup>2</sup> = 7.30; p = 0.007) and to have a positive attitude towards glaucoma screening (X<sup>2</sup> = 4.67; p = 0.03). Surprisingly, level of education had no significant relationship with overall knowledge regarding glaucoma (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.44; p = 0.5) or with practice of glaucoma screening (X<sup>2</sup> = 0.12; p = 0.73; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Gender had a significant relationship with awareness, overall knowledge of glaucoma, and practice of glaucoma screening but not with attitude to glaucoma screening. Thus, men were more likely to be aware of glaucoma (29.3% men vs. 14.9% women; X<sup>2</sup> = 12.27; p &lt; 0.001) but, in contrast, females were more likely to have good knowledge of glaucoma (9.2%) women vs. 3.5% men; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.35; p = 0.04). However, routine eye examination for glaucoma screening was significantly more common among men (18.9% men vs. 10.9% women; X<sup>2</sup> = 4.49; p = 0.03; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>Positive family history of glaucoma had a significant relationship with awareness (X<sup>2</sup> = 28.8; p = 0. 004) and knowledge (X<sup>2</sup> = 7.73; p = 0.05) of glaucoma.<sup> </sup></p><p>Knowledge of glaucoma was significantly related to attitude towards glaucoma screening.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion</title><p>Awareness of glaucoma was found to be very poor in this population, with only 21.1% of respondents being</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Glaucoma screening</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >A. Attitude to glaucoma screening</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Do you think that you need glaucoma screening? Yes No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >246 156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.2 38.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >B. Practice of glaucoma screening</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Have you ever had your eyes examined by an eye doctor? Yes No Why were your eyes examined? (n = 58) Routine Prompted by symptoms</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 354 20 38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4 85.6 34.5 65.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between socio-demographic variables and glaucoma knowledge, attitude, and practice of glaucoma screening</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Glaucoma awareness</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >X<sup>2</sup>; p value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. Gender Male Female B. Education ≤ Primary school ≥ Secondary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (29.3) 34 (14.9) 32 (15.5) 53 (27.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123 (70.7) 194 (85.1) 174 (84.5) 143 (73.0)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174 228 206 (100) 196 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2</sup> = 12.27 p &lt; 0.01 X<sup>2</sup> = 7.30; p &lt; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Attitude to glaucoma screening</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Positive (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Negative (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤ Primary school ≥ Secondary school</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115 (55.8) 131 (66.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 (44.2) 65 (33.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >206 (100) 196 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2</sup> = 4.67; p = 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Knowledge of glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Good (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Poor (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. Gender Male Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (3.5) 21 (9.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168 (96.5) 207 (90.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174 (100) 228 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2</sup> = 4.35; p = 0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Ever been screened for glaucoma</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33 (18.9) 25 (10.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141 (81.1) 203 (89.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >174 (100) 228 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>2</sup> = 4.49; p = 0.03</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>aware of the disease. This finding is consistent with the findings of several earlier studies on glaucoma awareness and knowledge performed inpatients attending eye care services [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref14">14</xref>] , in the general population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref15">15</xref>] , and in glaucoma patients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref19">19</xref>] . Awareness has also been shown to be particularly poor in rural communities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref11">11</xref>] and among respondents of non-European descent in a Canadian study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref9">9</xref>] . The insidious nature of the disease is believed to be contributory to this poor awareness.</p><p>In our study, religion and age had no significant influence on glaucoma awareness. This is similar to the findings of Mbadugha et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref19">19</xref>] in Lagos, Nigeria, and Prabhu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref20">20</xref>] in South India. It however differs from the findings of many other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref17">17</xref>] ; for example, in an urban population-based study, Dandona et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref11">11</xref>] reported that people aged 30 years and above were significantly more likely to be aware of glaucoma.</p><p>Many earlier studies have found that women were more likely to report awareness of glaucoma than men [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref20">20</xref>] . However, we found the converse, with men being significantly (p &lt; 0.001) more likely to be aware of glaucoma than women This might be because the commonest source of information reported in this study was the radio, and women’s participation in community radio programming is known to be poor across West Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Educational level, as expected, remains a key determinant of awareness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref11">11</xref>] . In this study, respondents with ≥secondary education were significantly (p &lt; 0.01) more likely to be aware of the disease than those with ≤primary education. This finding is consistent with Landers et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref7">7</xref>] , who reported that respondents with higher educational level were 1.8 times more likely to report awareness of glaucoma than those with lower educational level.</p><p>The influence of positive family history on awareness was very significant in this study. As expected, respondents with relatives suffering from glaucoma were more likely to be aware of glaucoma and have good knowledge regarding the disease. This trend has been observed in most studies on awareness and knowledge of glaucoma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>Knowledge of glaucoma was found to be poorer than awareness in this study, with only 6.3% of the respondents having good knowledge of the disease. Most respondents (86.1%) did not even know that glaucoma is a blinding eye disease.</p><p>It was surprising to note that although awareness of glaucoma was higher in men, knowledge about glaucoma was significantly higher in women (p &lt; 0.05). It is possible that though more males may have heard about the disease through the radio, it is usually women who go to hospitals with their children for general care or attend free eye outreach programs and thereby receive better health education and knowledge regarding specific diseases.</p><p>Positive family history of glaucoma had a significant relationship with good knowledge of the disease (p &lt; 0.1). This is not surprising because of these respondents would have had personal experience with the challenges of the disease and its management.<sup> </sup></p><p>There was no relationship between awareness of glaucoma and the level of knowledge regarding glaucoma in this study. This agrees with the report by Mbadugha and Onakoya [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref19">19</xref>] who observed that even among glaucoma patients on treatment, knowledge regarding the disease was inadequate. This finding highlights the need for appropriate focused community health education campaigns that will go beyond creating awareness and impart adequate knowledge regarding glaucoma to the populace. It is also important for doctors to use every opportunity to provide relevant information to patients to increase patients’ knowledge about their disease.</p><p>Surprisingly, educational status was not found to be significantly related to knowledge regarding glaucoma in this study. This highlights the need to include eye health education into the school curriculum at various levels of education, perhaps as part of general studies.</p><p>There was a discrepancy between the proportion of respondents with a positive attitude towards glaucoma screening (61.2%) and the proportion actually undergoing screening (5%). This discrepancy persisted even among those who were aware of glaucoma. While 70.6% of them were willing to undergo glaucoma screening, only 27.1% had gone for routine eye screening. It has been suggested that since the disease is often symptomless, the motivation for routine glaucoma screening will only stem from good knowledge about the disease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.67020-ref23">23</xref>] , which was found to be very poor in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion and Recommendations</title><p>To conclude, glaucoma awareness and knowledge were poor in this rural community; however, a high proportion of respondents had a positive attitude towards glaucoma screening.</p><p>We recommend appropriate focused community health education campaigns that will go beyond creating awareness and impart adequate knowledge of glaucoma to the general population. Eye care providers must use every opportunity to convey information on glaucoma to patients.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>C. E. Ogbonnaya,L. U. Ogbonnaya,O. Okoye,N. Kizor-Akaraiwe, (2016) Glaucoma Awareness and Knowledge, and Attitude to Screening, in a Rural Community in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Open Journal of Ophthalmology,06,119-127. doi: 10.4236/ojoph.2016.62017</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.67020-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tielsch, J.M., Sommer, A., Katz, J., Royall, R.M., Quigley, H.A. and Javitt, J. (1996) Racial Variations in the Prevalence of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 369-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470030069026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quigley, H.A. and Broman, A.T. (2006) The Number of People with Glaucoma Worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 90, 262-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nigerian Eye Survey Group (2005-2007) The Nigeria National Blindness and Low Vision Survey.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bowman</surname><given-names> R.J.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>How to Manage Glaucoma in a Patient in Africa</article-title><source> Community Eye Health Journal</source><volume> 19</volume>,<fpage> 38</fpage>-<lpage>39</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Altangerel, U., Hema, S., Shetty, N., et al. (2009) Knowledge about Glaucoma and Barriers to Follow-Up Care in a Community Glaucoma Screening Programme. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 44, 66-69.http://dx.doi.org/10.3129/i08-175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ogbonnaya</surname><given-names> C.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Profile of Blindness and Low Vision at Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital (EBSUTH) Abakaliki</article-title><source> EMJ</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 13</fpage>-<lpage>19</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Landers, J.A., Franzco, I.G. and Franzco, S.L.G. (2002) Factors Affecting Awareness and Knowledge of Glaucoma among Patients Presenting to an Urban Emergency Department. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 30, 104- 109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-6404.2002.00493.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Livingstone, P.M., Lee, S.E., Depaola, C., Carson, C., Guest, C. and Taylor, H.R. (1995) Knowledge of Glaucoma and Its Relationship to Self-Care Practices in a Population Sample. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 23, 37-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.1995.tb01643.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kukuh, N., Maberly, D., Bassett, K. and Courtright, P. (2006) Awareness of Eye Diseases and Risk Factors: Identifying Needs for Health Education and Promotion in Canada. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 41, 617-623.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-4182(06)80035-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tenkir, A., Solomon, B. and Deribew, A. (2010) Glaucoma Awareness among People Attending Ophthalmic Outreach Services in Southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmology, 10, 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-10-17</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dandona, R., Dandona, L., John, R.K., McCathy, C.A. and Rao, G.N. (2001) Awareness of Eye Diseases in a Population in Southern India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79, 96-102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saw, S.M., Gazzard, G., Forster, P.S., Devereux, J.G. and Wong, M.L. (2003) Awareness of Glaucoma and Health Beliefs of Patients Suffering Primary Acute Angle Glaucoma. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 87, 446-449.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.4.446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa, V.P., Spaeth, G.L., Smith, M., Uddoh, C., Vasconcellos, J.P.C. and José, N.K. (2006) Patient Education in Glaucoma: What Do Patients Know about Glaucoma? Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 69, 923-927.http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492006000600024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sudesh, S., Downes, S.M. and McDonnell, P.J. (1993) Audit of Patients’ Awareness of Ophthalmic Diagnoses. Quality in Health Care, 2, 175-178.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2.3.175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baker, H., Cousens, S.N. and Murdoch, I.E. (2010) Poor Public Health Knowledge about Glaucoma: Fact or Fiction? Eye, 24, 653-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2009.155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Green, J., Siddah, H. and Mudrock, I. (2002) Learning to Live with Glaucoma. A Qualitative Study of Diagnosis and Impact of Sight Loss. Social Science and Medicine, 55, 257-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00169-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sheldrick, J.H., Ng, C. and Austin, D.J. (1994) An Analysis of Referral Routes and Diagnostic Accuracy in Cases of Suspected Glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 1, 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09286589409071443</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mafwiri, M., Bowman, R.J., Wood, M. and Kabiru, J. (2005) Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Presentation at a Tertiary Unit in Africa: Intraocular Pressure Levels and Visual Status. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 12, 299-302.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09286580500180572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mbadugha, C.A. and Onakoya, A.O. (2014) The Awareness, Perceptions and Experiences of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in Lagos Nigeria. Scientific Reports, 4, 7585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep07585</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prabhu, M., Patil, S. and Kangokar, P. (2013) Glaucoma Awareness and Knowledge in a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Tier 2 City in South India. Journal of the Scientific Society, 40, 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-5009.109674</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sathyamangalam, R., Paul, P.G., Baskaran, M., Hemamalini, A., Madan, R., Augustian, J., Prema, R. and Lingam, V. (2009) Determinants of Glaucoma Awareness and Knowledge in Urban Chennai. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 57, 355-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.55073</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fortune, F., Chungong, C. and Kessinger, A. (2011) Community Radio, Gender and ICTs in West Africa. Search for Common Good, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.67020-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adegbehingbe, B.O. and Bisiriyu, L.A. (2008) Knowledge, Attitude and Self Care Practices Associated with Glaucoma among Hospital Workers in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, 10, 240-245.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>