<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MME</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Modern Mechanical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-0165</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/mme.2016.61001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MME-63342</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Study of Mechanical and Micro-Structural Effect on Alkaline Treated Sponge Gourd (&lt;i&gt; Luffa aegyptiaca &lt;/i&gt;) Fibre Epoxy Composite
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>I. Ichetaonye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>D.</surname><given-names>N. Ichetaonye</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>O.</surname><given-names>G. Tenebe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Polymer Technology, Nigerian Institute of Leather &amp;amp; Science Technology, Zaria, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Polymer and Textile Technology, Yaba College of Technology, Yaba, Lagos</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>1</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this present work, the study of mechanical and micro-structural effect on alkaline treated sponge gourd fibre epoxy composite has been investigated experimentally. Composite laminates are fabricated by hand lay-up technique. Scanning Electro Microscope analysis on the composite materials is performed. A group of neat epoxy samples is fabricated for comparison purpose. Samples are analysed for their mechanical properties to establish an alkaline effect on sponge gourd. Indeed, a maximum value of strength and strain is observed over 20% filler loading for 24 hrs treated fibre composite.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sponge Gourd</kwd><kwd> Fibre</kwd><kwd> Flexural</kwd><kwd> Modulus</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>During the last decade, natural fibre reinforced polymeric composites which substitute glass reinforcement, have witnessed considerable growth. This is attributed to their unique properties. These materials have the potential advantages of weight-saving (light material), lower raw material price from natural origin, and “thermal recycling” or the ecological advantages of using resources which are renewable. Due to the importance of natural fibre reinforced composite many non-structural components for the automotive and other sectors are now made from natural fibre composite materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref1">1</xref>] . These materials are largely based on polypropylene, polyester and polyamide matrices incorporating natural fibres, such as sponge gourd (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), hemp etc. Another major area</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Dried sponge gourd</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x7.png"/></fig><p>that can extend the application of natural-fibre composites is the improvement of long-term performance including improved resistance to ultraviolet radiation and creep. Overall, natural-fibre composites are seen as potential materials for many engineering applications. However, there are still important issues that limit their future use, including long-term performance and the ability to be able to predict performance during service. Saheb et al. report that fracture mechanics can give great insight into the physical effects occurring within these composites which enable the production of natural-fibre composites with improved properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref2">2</xref>] . Debiprasad et al. mention that jute fibre composites enjoy excellent potential as wood substitutes in view of their low cost, easy availability saving in energy and commercialization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref3">3</xref>] . Nor Azwin bt Ahad et al. mention that natural fibre offers an alternative to the technical reinforcing fibre because of their low density, good mechanical performance, ultimate availability and disposability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The sponge gourd fruit is a cylindrical, smooth and dehiscent capsule, 20 - 50 cm long by 6 - 10 cm broad, which has a characteristic fibrous mesocarp. However, the seeds are numerous, dull black, elliptic-ovoid 10 - 12 mm long by 6 - 8 mm broad. It is best grown with a trellis support, requires lots of heat and lots of water to thrive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref6">6</xref>] . Gourds can be expected to mature around four months after planting after which it turns fibrous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref8">8</xref>] . Being a natural fibre it has recently attracted the attention of scientists and technologists because of the advantages that these fibres provide over conventional reinforcement materials and the development of natural fibre composites has been a subject of interest for the past few years. These natural fibres are low-cost fibres with low density and high specific properties. These are biodegradable and nonabrasive, unlike other reinforcing fibres. Also, they are readily available and their specific properties are comparable to those of other fibres used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>1) Sponge Gourd</p><p>2) Epoxy (LY 556) and Hardener (HY 951)</p><p>3) Sodium Hydroxide</p><p>4) Distilled water</p><p>5) 88 Universal Mold Release Wax</p><p>6) Acetic Acid</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Equipment</title><p>The equipment use was:</p><p>1) Digital weighing balance (Pocket Scale, Black AWS-100 g)</p><p>2) Steel mould (dumb-bell and sheet shape)</p><p>3) mm sieve, (YS-C-638)</p><p>4) Beaker and measuring cylinder (200 and 100 mils respectively)</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Material Preparation</title><p>Raw sponge gourd fibre was cut opened lengthwise, the dried seeds shaken out and the dried fibrous sun-dried for six (6) hours. It was later cut into smaller sizes, grounded and then sieved with 1.0 mm sieve to obtain fine fibre particles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Composite samples were fabricated with 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% fillers in the ratio of 2:1 as in volume fraction using dumb-bell mould of 120 mm &#215; 30 mm &#215; 3 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>) and rectangular sheet mould of 187 mm &#215; 125 mm &#215; 3 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) by hand laying method and finally left to air-cure for</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Grinded sponge fibres of particle size 1.0 mm</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Dumb bell sponge gourd composite</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Rectangular sheet sponge gourd</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x10.png"/></fig><p>24 hrs. Thereafter, the laminates are taken carefully without any damage. Specimens are cut for testing as per ASTM standards.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Fibre Chemical Treatment</title><p>The fibres were immersed in NaOH solution with a concentration of 20% for 12 and 24 hours respectively at room temperature. After treatment, the fibres were washed with 2% acetic acid and again washed under running water then finally allowed to dry at room temperature for 2 days.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Characterization of Composite Materials</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Determination of Swelling Behaviour</title><p>The specimens were weighed dried (W<sub>i</sub>), immersed in 100 ml volume of methanol solvent at room temperature for 48 hrs. After this, the samples were filtered and the excess solvent was removed patted dry with a lint free cloth and then the final weight (W<sub>f</sub>) was noted. The percent swelling was calculated using Equation (1).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63342-formula23"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Determination of Tensile Strength</title><p>The tensile strength test was conducted on a computerized universal testing machine. The tensile test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D 3039 method. The sample of 120 mm length was clamped into the two jaws of the machine. Each end of the jaws covered 30 mm of the sample. Reading of the tensile strength test instrument for Newton force and extension were initially set at zero (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Tensile stress was applied until the failure of the sample and load-extension curve was obtained. Four (4) specimens of each sample have been used for the measurement of the above mechanical properties at ambient laboratory environment and average results are reported. From the obtained load and elongation values, the tensile strength and modulus are calculated.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Determination of Flexural Strength Test</title><p>Flexural strength of samples was also tested on the computerized universal testing machine. The three-point bend flexural test was conducted in accordance with ASTM D 790 method. The five (5) samples with desired dimensions and velocity of 0.2 mm/second were tested (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The σbh flexural strength, namely the maximum stress at break, was calculated using the formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63342-formula24"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, σbh = Flexural strength; b = Width of specimen (mm); F = Breaking force (Newton); h = Thickness of Specimen (mm); L = Support distance (mm).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Swelling Behaviour</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> is a graph of swelling behaviour against fibre content of sponge gourd fibre composite. The figure revealed that the swelling behaviour decreases as fibre content increases for all polymer composite having the least swelling behaviour percentage rate at 25% to be 7.06%, 4.87% and 4.23% for untreated, treated 12 hrs and treated 24 hrs respectively compared to that of the control sample which has 18.18%. Still on 25% fibre content, untreated polymer composite exhibits the highest swelling rate due to its greater affinity of water for OH groups present in the fibre reinforced polymer composites as well as the micro-cracks and non-uniform fibre-matrix adhesion compared to that of the treated polymer composite with very low affinity and better fibre matrix interaction.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Ultimate Strength of Samples</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> show the strength variation with different percentage filler loading in tensile and flexural</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> UTS machine sample loaded for tensile testing</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> UTS machine sample loaded for flexural testing</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x14.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Swelling behaviour of sponge gourd fibre composite against filler loading</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x15.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Ultimate tensile strength of sponge gourd fibre composite against filler loading</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x16.png"/></fig><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Flexural strength of sponge gourd fibre composite against filler loading</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x17.png"/></fig><p>strength respectively. However, both figures indicate a gradual increase in both tensile and flexural strength up to 20% fibre content with 20% exhibiting the highest strength for treated polymer composite improved by the sponge gourd fibre than that of the control. Furthermore, at 25% filler loading there was a decrease in strength for both tensile and flexural strength for treated and untreated polymer composite because maximum strength had been attained and further addition of fibre content disrupts the fibre-matrix adhesion due to insufficient wetting of the fibre with the matrix.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Load at Break of Samples</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1 show the effect of filler loading on both load at break and tensile modulus respectively. It can be seen that the properties of both untreated and treated (12 hrs and 24 hrs) sponge gourd fibre composite increase gradually with increasing filler loading up to 20%. This was due to the incorporation of sponge gourd fibres into the polymer matrix which enhanced the stiffness of the composites especially for 24 hrs treated fibres and gives better interaction between fibre and matrix compared to the control sample. However, 25% filler loading exhibited a decrease in both properties due to poor wetting of fibre. The untreated fibre composite shows lower properties than the treated samples due to higher lignin content on its surface which tends to agglomerate through the formation of hydrogen bonding [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63342-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Micro-Structural Analysis</title><p>Figures 12-14 show the phase morphology of sponge gourd fibre composite with untreated and treated (12 hrs and 24 hrs) filler loading of 5%. From the micrographs, it is clearly evident that the 24 hrs treated composite gives better interfacial interaction than the untreated and treated 12 hrs composite.</p><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Load at break of sponge gourd fibre composite against filler loading</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x18.png"/></fig><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Modulus of sponge gourd fibre composite against filler loading</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x19.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> SEM image of sponge gourd fibre composite at filler loading of 5 % untreated</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x20.png"/></fig><fig id="fig13"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> SEM image of sponge gourd fibre composite at filler loading of 5% treated for 12 hrs</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x21.png"/></fig><fig id="fig14"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>4</label><caption><title> SEM image of sponge gourd fibre composite at filler loading of 5% treated for 24 hrs</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1860270x22.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The study of mechanical and micro-structural effect of alkaline treated sponge gourd (luffa ageyptiaca) fibre epoxy composite is examined as a function of fibre loading. From the results generated, it can be established that NaOH pre-treatment of sponge gourd fibre has better reinforcing properties than the untreated fibres. The treatment is observed to have improved the flexural and tensile properties i.e. tensile strength, load at break and modulus of the composite as well as decreasing the swelling behaviour of the composite. However, 20% filler loading for 24 hrs treated fibre composite gives the best reinforcing/mechanical properties compared to other composites due to the adhesion between sponge gourd fibre and the polymer matrix.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>S. I.Ichetaonye,D. N.Ichetaonye,O. G.Tenebe, (2016) Study of Mechanical and Micro-Structural Effect on Alkaline Treated Sponge Gourd ( Luffa aegyptiaca ) Fibre Epoxy Composite. Modern Mechanical Engineering,06,1-9. doi: 10.4236/mme.2016.61001</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63342-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jyoti, P.D. and Mishra, S.C. (2012) Processing and Properties of Natural Fibre—Reinforced Polymer Composite. Journal of Materials, 10, 27-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saheb, D.N. and Jog, J.P. (1999) Natural Fibre Polymer Composite: A Review, Advances in Polymer Technology. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 18, 351-363.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Debiprasad, G., Kousik, D., Palash, P. and Subhankar, M. (2012) Jute Composites as Wood Substitute. International Journal of Textile Science, 6, 84-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nor, A.B.A., Noraziana, P., Noraziana, M., Siti, S.I., Khairul, N. and Ying, M.H. (2009) Effect of Chemical Treatment on the Surface of Natural Fibre. Journal of Nuclear and Related Technologies, 6, 155-158.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Davis</surname><given-names> J.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1996</year>)<article-title>Luffa Sponge Gourd Production Practices for Temperate Climates</article-title><source> Horticulture Science</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 263</fpage>-<lpage>266</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>De Courley</surname><given-names> C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1998</year>)<article-title>Luffa Research. A Wrap-Up Report</article-title><source> Small Farm Today</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 19</fpage>-<lpage>22</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Davis</surname><given-names> J.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1996</year>)<article-title>Luffa Sponge Gourd Production Practices for Temperate Climates</article-title><source> Horticulture Science</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 263</fpage>-<lpage>266</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Myrtha, K., Holia, O. and Anung, S. (2007) Physical and Mechanical Properties of Natural Fibres Filled Polypropylene Composites and Its Recycle. Polymer Engineering Science, 7, 393-396.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mallick, P.K. (2007) Fibre Reinforced Composites. CRC Press, London, New York, 1-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huo, S., Fuqua, M., Chevali, V. and Ulven, C. (2010) Effects of Natural Fibre Surface Treatments and Matrix Modification on Mechanical Properties of Their Composites. SAE Technical Paper, 01, 35-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63342-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onyeagoro, G.N. and Enyiegbulam, M.E. (2012) Physico-Mechanical Properties of Cellulose Acetate Butyrate/Yellow Poplar Wood Fibre Composites as a Function of Fibre Aspect Ratio, Fibre Loading, and Fibre Acetylation. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 1, 385-397.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>