<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">NS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Natural Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2150-4091</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ns.2016.82004</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">NS-63305</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nickel Antimony Sulphide Thin Films for Solar Cell Application: Study of Optical Constants
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aima</surname><given-names>Mushtaq</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bushra</surname><given-names>Ismail</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Muhammad</surname><given-names>Raheel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aurang</surname><given-names>Zeb</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of General Studies, Jubail University College, Jubail Industrial City, KSA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Applied Physics, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>02</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>08</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>31</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Chemical bath deposition technique has been used to deposit Ni-doped Sb2S3 thin films onto glass substrate. Doping was carried out by adding 1, 3 and 5 wt% of Ni. Bath temperature was kept as 10℃ and films were annealed at 250
  ℃
   under vacuum. Polycrystalline nature of films with an orthorhombic phase was analyzed by X-ray diffraction technique. Scanning electron microscopy was used for morphological study which shows that grains are spherical. Optical measurements using transmittance data indicated that films have a direct band gap of 1.00 - 2.60 eV with an absorption coefficient of ~104 cm
  <sup>-1</sup> in visible range. The average value of electrical conductivity was calculated as 1.66, 1.11 and 1.06 (Ω
  &#183;cm)
  <sup>-1</sup> for as-deposited films and 1.90, 2.08 and 1.15 (Ω
  &#183;cm)
  <sup>-1</sup> for annealed films while refractive indices were found as 2.18 - 3.38 and 1.91 - 3.74 respectively. The obtained films can be used for solar cell applications due to their good absorbing properties like higher absorption coefficient and refractive index values.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ni Doped</kwd><kwd> Optical Constants</kwd><kwd> Sb2S3 Thin Films</kwd><kwd> Chalcogenides</kwd><kwd> Solar Cells</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Thin films of chalcogenide family (sulphides, selenides, tellurides) are gaining much attention these days due to their wide applications in optoelectronic devices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref1">1</xref>] . One of the members of chalcogenide family, antimony sulphide (Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>) is under intense consideration for its use in thin film solar cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref2">2</xref>] . Some of the properties of Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> which signify its large scale applicability in optoelectronics are their high refractive index, absorption coefficient of the order of 10<sup>5</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>, band gap of 1.7 eV and well-defined quantum size effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref3">3</xref>] . Apart from all the above mentioned properties, Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> has problem of high resistivity and low optical transmission, which hinder its applications at large scale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref4">4</xref>] . Based on the recent literature survey on the current research trends in the field of design and development of Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films, a two-way approach has been used so far for the alteration of properties. One is the use of various deposition techniques and the other is the modification of properties of Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> by the addition of different dopants. Various techniques are used to deposit amorphous and crystalline Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films such as chemical bath deposition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref5">5</xref>] , electro-deposition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref6">6</xref>] , spray pyrolysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref7">7</xref>] , vacuum thermal evaporation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref8">8</xref>] and dip and dry method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref9">9</xref>] . Similarly, different dopants like carbon, tin, lead, bismuth, copper and silver are used to improve the structural, optical and electrical properties of material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref11">11</xref>] . Annealing of the films after deposition changes their optical properties due to change in their structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Both the already mentioned approaches alter the structural and the morphological properties which in turn affect the optical transmission and reflectance of thin films based on their thickness variations. Going through the detailed literature survey on the deposition and properties of thin films, the approach of studies up till now is mostly focused on the phase evolution, grain size and structure and their effects on the transmission properties and band gap values. Although the thorough studies of the optical constants like refractive index, absorption coefficient, extinction coefficient and electrical properties like dielectric constant and electrical conductivity are important for the use of material as an absorbing material in solar cells. Very few reports are found on the studies of optical constants on the bare Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> and their doped derivatives.</p><p>The objective of this research is to study the effect of Ni doping on Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films grown by chemical bath deposition (CBD) technique at substrate temperature of 10˚C. The important characteristic of it is that large area films can be deposited regardless of shape and morphology of the substrate without any sophisticated instrumentation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Details</title><p>Nickel antimony sulphide thin films were prepared by chemical bath deposition technique onto glass substrate. The solution was prepared using 650 mg of SbCl<sub>3</sub> (Merck, 99%) dissolved in 10 ml of Acetone and CH<sub>3</sub>COCH<sub>3</sub> (Merck, 99%) with 25 ml of 1M Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (Aldrich, 99%) dissolved in 65 ml of distilled water. The solution was prepared in 100 ml beaker with 1, 3 and 5% of NiCl<sub>2</sub>. Orange-yellow solution turned dark orange when kept for 15 to 20 minutes. The glass substrates were cleaned using ethyl alcohol, chromic acid and distilled water. The substrates were kept vertically in solution beaker. The deposition was made at a substrate temperature of 10˚C for 2 hours. The films were annealed for 2 hours at 250˚C under low vacuum condition to improve their crystallinity.</p><p>Crystal structure of films was obtained by X-ray diffraction technique using PANalytical XPert Pro (Holland). CuKα radiation with a wavelength of 1.54&#197; was used. Scanning electron microscopy (JEO1, JSM-5910) was used for surface morphology of annealed Ni-doped films. Optical transmittance spectra were measured at room temperature in the wavelength range of 400 - 800 nm using Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 spectrophotometer.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>X-ray diffraction measurements were carried out in the range 2θ = 20˚ - 70˚ to analyze the crystal structure and grain size of Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films. The comparison of the patterns is done taking standard pattern of orthorhombic Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> (ICSD code: 001-0538) as a reference material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref5">5</xref>] , as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Grain size (D), lattice parameters (a, b and c), unit cell volume (V<sub>cell</sub>) and X-ray density were determined using the following equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref12">12</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula67"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula68"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Standard XRD pattern for Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> (ICSD # 001-0538)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x9.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula69"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula70"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where β is full width at half maximum of the peak intensity, λ is the wavelength of incident X-ray (1.54 &#197;), k is the shape factor with a value of 0.9, d is the d-spacing value between the planes, hkl are miller indices, Z is number of molecules per formula unit which has a value 4 for the orthorhombic crystal system, M is the molecular weight and N<sub>A</sub> is the Avogadro’s number. X-ray diffraction patterns for Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films with varying concentrations of Ni which are deposited at 10˚C and annealed at 250˚C are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>A comparison of 2θ and d-spacing values of the deposited samples with the standard sample is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The XRD patterns of the deposited samples were compared with standard pattern of Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> (ICSD code: 001- 0538) with lattice parameters; a = 11.20 &#197;, b = 11.28 &#197;, c = 3.83 &#197;, V<sub>cell</sub> = 483.87 &#197;<sup>3</sup> and ρ<sub>X-ray</sub> = 4.63 g/cm<sup>3</sup>. It can be seen that films are polycrystalline with an orthorhombic stibnite phase. The preferential plan for 1% Ni-doped film was found at 2θ = 22.31˚ corresponding to hkl plane (220) while for 3% and 5% Ni-doped films it was shifted towards 2θ = 24.92˚ with hkl plane (130). The calculated lattice parameters in comparison with un-doped sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref13">13</xref>] are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The lattice parameters for 1% and 3% are in good agreement with un-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin film sample with the grain size increasing from 21 nm to 63 nm while for 5% Ni-doping, a drastic increase in grain size can be seen, i.e.; grain size was found as 24 &#181;m. The increase in grain size can be attributed to increase in film thickness with higher Ni concentrations as observed during experimental work and the change in lattice parameters for 5% doping shows that there may be formation of any other phase of NiSbS.</p><p>Scanning electron micrographs for 1%, 3% and 5% Ni doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. It can be seen that grains are solid and spherical with well-defined boundaries for all the films. The grains are distributed randomly on the surface for 1% and 5% Ni doping while the inter-grain distance for 3% Ni doped film is very small. The growth of particles with increase of Ni concentration can be seen from SEM micrographs. Since the boundaries are clear so we can calculate grain size from SEM micrographs using the mean linear intercept method by the formula:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula71"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where, L is line length on the micrograph, N is the number of grains crossed by that line, m is magnification of micrograph and 1.5 is called as the shape factor.</p><p>The grain size calculated as 180, 360 and 360 &#181;m for 1%, 3% and 5% Ni doped films respectively. The obtained values are greater than the values calculated by XRD due to the reason that XRD gives average information about entire film thickness while SEM extracts the surface analysis in micrometers.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> XRD patterns for Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films with varying concentrations of Ni</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Scanning electron micrographs for Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films with varying concentrations: (a) 1%; (b) 3% and (c) 5%</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x14.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of 2θ and d<sub>hkl</sub> values of deposited films with standard pattern of Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >ICSD # 001-0538 (Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1% Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3% Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5% Ni</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2θ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>hkl </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hkl</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2θ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>hkl</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2θ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>hkl</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2θ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >d<sub>hkl</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.12<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.017</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.079</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.897</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.92<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.570</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.604</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.54<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.626</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.82<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.587</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.437</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.534</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.920</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >530</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.720</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >531</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.689</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.355</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Peak with maximum intensity.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Lattice parameters and grain size of annealed Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Ni</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >b (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>cell</sub> (&#197;<sup>3</sup>)<sub> </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ρ<sub>X-ray</sub> (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D (nm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >490</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >509</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >501</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >652</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2413</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub><sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >483</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Standard values.</p><p>UV/vis spectra of both the as-deposited as well as annealed were taken for the determination of optical constants like refractive index, absorption coefficient, extinction coefficient and electrical properties like dielectric constant and electrical conductivity. The optical absorbance spectra for as-deposited Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>The absorbance was calculated in wavelength range of 400 - 800 nm. It can be seen that the high absorbance region for 1% Ni-doped films can be found in the range 500 - 700 nm while for 3% Ni-doped films maximum value of absorbance can be seen at wavelength of 600 nm. The decreasing values for absorbance can be observed in the wavelength range 450 - 600 nm for 5% Ni doping. Absorbance spectra of the annealed Ni doped thin films were also taken for comparison. These spectra are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p><p>The absorption coefficient, α can be calculated by transmittance data using following relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula72"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where d is thickness of film and R is the reflectance. The average value of α was found in the range of 10<sup>4</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup> in visible region for all of the as-deposited as well as annealed Ni-doped thin films (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). The high absorption value ~10<sup>4</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup> has a significant effect on solar conversion efficiency. Gracia et al. have suggested that scattering loses could be the reason for increase in absorbance due to overgrowth of particles on the surface of film [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref14">14</xref>] . The growth of particles can be seen from SEM images. The increase in grain size also supports the high absorption coefficient value.</p><p>The optical band gap of Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films can be determined using Tauce’s relation.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula73"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A is constant which depends on transition probability, Eg is band gap energy between bottom of conduction band and top of valence band, n is an index parameter with the values 2 and 1/2 for indirect and direct band</p><p>gap respectively. The band gap values can be obtained by plotting graph between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as shown</p><p>in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> both for as-deposited and annealed samples. The best linear fit were obtained for n = 1/2 which shows that the dominant transition is direct transition here. The extrapolation of linear portion towards <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives the value for band gap shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. There could be different reasons for band gap variation like morphology of films, deposition parameters and environment and grain boundaries, etc.</p><p>The extinction coefficient k was found using following relation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula74"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The variation of extinction coefficient values can be depicted from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. It can be seen that the values ranges from 0.10 - 0.27 and 0.04 - 0.24 for as-deposited and annealed films, respectively. The low value of extinction coefficient for both as-deposited and annealed thin films shows the smoothness and homogeneity of deposited films. The refractive indices for Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films were calculated using the following relation.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula75"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Absorbance spectra of as deposited Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> films with varying Ni concentrations</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x22.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Absorbance spectra of annealed Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> films with varying Ni concentrations</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x23.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Band gap values obtained for the as deposited samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x24.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Optical parameters for as-deposited and annealed Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >As-deposited</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >k</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ε</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >α (cm<sup>−1</sup>) &#215; 10<sup>4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Eg (eV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >σe (Ω&#215;cm)<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >σo (s<sup>−1</sup>) &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >σt (W/K∙m) &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >2.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >5.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >07.77</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Annealed</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >03.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >03.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >22.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Band gap values obtained for the annealed samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x25.png"/></fig><p>The different values of refractive index were calculated in the wavelength range 400 - 800 nm. The average values are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. The high refractive index values can be attributed to increase in crystal quality and grain size. The dielectric constant values were calculated using the relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula76"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The maximum value of dielectric constant was found for 5% Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films as 13.34 and 22.90 for as-deposited and annealed films, respectively; which show that doping has remarkable effect at higher concentration. The response of optical conductivity σ<sub>o</sub> was seen using the relation.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula77"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Both the as-deposited and annealed Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films have high optical conductivity response ~10<sup>14</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> in wavelength range 400 - 800 nm. The average value for each sample is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Electrical conductivity values were measured using</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula78"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It can be observed from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> that all the samples have values of the electrical conductivity in the range for semi-conductors, which is 10<sup>−12</sup> - 10<sup>2</sup> (Ω&#215;cm)<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref15">15</xref>] . Thermal conductivity measurements were made using the relation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.63305-ref15">15</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.63305-formula79"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-8302681x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where L is Lorentz number with a value of 2.45 &#215; 10<sup>−8</sup> W∙Ω∙K<sup>−2</sup> and T is temperature. The values for optical constants are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Ni-doped Sb<sub>2</sub>S<sub>3</sub> thin films have been deposited using chemical bath deposition technique. Doping was carried out using 1, 3 and 5 wt% of Ni. Polycrystalline orthorhombic crystal structure of films was analyzed using XRD technique. Scanning electron microscopy showed that grains are solid and spherical. The band gap values were calculated in the range 1.0 - 2.6 eV with an absorption coefficient value ~10<sup>4</sup> cm<sup>−1</sup>. The electrical conductivity values were found in limit of values for semiconductor. High absorbance properties confirm its use for solar cell application.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Authors highly acknowledge Late Dr. Syed Tajammul Hussain who has provided us lab facilities at department of Nano Sciences and Catalysis Division, National Center for Physics (NCP) Islamabad for the completion of experimental work.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>SaimaMushtaq,BushraIsmail,MuhammadRaheel,AurangZeb, (2016) Nickel Antimony Sulphide Thin Films for Solar Cell Application: Study of Optical Constants. Natural Science,08,33-40. doi: 10.4236/ns.2016.82004</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.63305-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Korozlu, N., Colakoglu, K., Deligoz, E. and Ciftci, Y. (2011) The Structural, Electronic and Optical Properties of CdxZn1-xSe Ternary Alloys. Optics Communications, 284, 1863-1867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2010.11.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, H., Hu, C., Ding, Y. and Lin, Y. (2015) Synthesis of 1D Sb2S3 Nanostructures and Its Application in Visible- Light-Driven Photodegradation for MO. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 625, 90-94.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ali, N., Ahmed, R., ul Haq, B., Shaari, A. and Jabeen, M. (2015) 200℃ Annealed Combinatorially Deposited Chalcogenide Based Metallic Thin Films for Photovoltaics. Measurements, 63, 81-86.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.11.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calixto-Rodriguez, M., Castillo, F., Martinez, H., Pena, Y. and Sanchez-Juarez, A. (2010) AC Plasma Induced Modifications in Sb2S3 Thin Films. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 207, No. 1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mushtaq, S., Ismail, B., Zeb, M. A., Kissinger, S. and Zeb, A. (2015) Low-Temperature Synthesis and Characterization of Sn-Doped Sb2S3 Thin Films for Solar Cell Applications. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 632, 723-728.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.01.307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yesugade, N., Lokhande, C. and Bhosale, C. (1995) Structural and Optical Properties of Electro Deposited Bi2S3, Sb2S3 and As2S3 Thin Films. Thin Solid Films, 263, 145-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(95)06577-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rajpure, K., Lokhande, C. and Bhosale, C. (1997) A Comparative Study of Concentration Effect of Complexing Agent on the Properties of Spray Deposited Sb2S3 Thin Films and Precipitated Powders. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 51, 252-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(97)80314-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abd-El-Rahman, K. and Darwish, A. (2011) Fabrication and Electrical Characterization of p-Sb2S3/n-Si Hetero Junctions for Solar Cells Application. Current Applied Physics, 11, 1265-1268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2010.12.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nayak, B.B., Acharya, H.N., Chaudhuri, T.K. and Mitra, G.B. (1982) The Dip-Dry Technique for Preparing Photosensitive Sb2S3 Films. Thin Solid Films, 92, 309-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(82)90153-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aousgi, F. and Kanzari, M. (2011) Study of the Optical properties of Sn-Doped Sb2S3 Thin Films. Energy Procedia, 10, 313-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.197</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cardenas, E., Arato, A., Perez-Tijerina, E., Roy, T.K.D., Castillo, G.A. and Krishnan, B. (2009) Carbon Doped Sb2S3 Thin Films: Structural, Optical and Electrical Properties. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 93, 33-36.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.02.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maghraoui-Meherzi, H., Nasr, T.B., Kamoun, N. and Dachraoui, M. (2010) Structural, Morphology and Optical Properties of Chemically Deposited Sb2S3 Thin Films. Physics B: Condensed Matter, 405, 3101-3105.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2010.04.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, B., Mushtaq, S. and Khan, A. (2014) Enhanced Grain Growth in the Sn Doped Sb2S3 Thin Film Absorber Materials for Solar Cell Applications. Chalcogenide Letters, 11, 37-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia, V.M., Nair, M.T.S. and Nair, P.K. (1991) Optical Properties of PbS/CuxS and Bi2S3/CuxS Thin Films with Reference to Solar Control and Solar Absorber Applications. Solar Energy Materials, 23, 47-59.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-1633(91)90152-B</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.63305-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ilenikhena</surname><given-names> P.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Optical Characterization and Possible Solar Energy Applications of Improved Solution Grown Cobalt Oxide (CoO) Thin Films at 300K</article-title><source> African Physical Review</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 68</fpage>-<lpage>76</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>