Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of hand osteoarthritis (hOA) in a population with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) at baseline and one year following the administration of a multi-professional OA educational program correlating symptoms and changes in BMI with function questionnaires of the upper limbs and direct grip strength measurements. Design: Epidemiological study of the prevalence of hand OA in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire instruments (HAQ); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand* (DASH); grip strength; and finger pinch were utilized, and the upper limbs symptoms were verified at baseline and one year following the educational program. Results: The prevalence of hOA was 23.7% at baseline and 47.4% at one year (incidence of 31.8% per year). The HAQ indicated that patients who did not alter or increased their BMI experienced worsened global strength, whereas patients who reduced BMI improved global strength (p = 0.041). Patients with higher initial BMIs experienced less improvement in the HAQ (r = -0.148, p = 0.041). The DASH results improved, but the right and left tripod grip worsened in all patients, irrespective of BMI change (p < 0.05) or symptoms at baseline and reassessment (p < 0.05). Pinch strength (right and left tripod and left pulp-pulp) was higher in patients without symptoms at baseline (p = 0.048, p = 0.045 and 0.033, respectively). Conclusions: The prevalence of hand OA increased for patients with OA undergoing an educational program irrespective of improved upper function and regardless of BMI change. Patients who decreased their BMI improved their global strength.
Hand Deformities Acquired Hand Strength Osteoarthritis Knee Prevalence Incidence Health Education1. Introduction
Despite being a common problem, hand osteoarthritis (OA) is less studied than knee and hip OA [1] . From 71 - 100 years of age, the prevalence of symptomatic OA reaches 26% in females and 13% males. As a result, these patients lose strength in the hands and have difficulties with daily manual activities [2] . The main joints involved are the proximal and distal interphalangeals and the first carpometacarpal [3] .
Inflammatory, metabolic and mechanical aspects involved in the pathogenesis of musculoskeletal diseases are directly associated with obesity [4] - [6] . Obese patients have an increased risk of developing hand OA due to inflammatory and metabolic factors, regardless of joint load [7] - [9] .
The current treatment for hand OA primarily aims at improving pain and function and preventing deformities. Currently, non-pharmacological conservative therapies include the use of orthotics, exercise, heat application, and patient education on joint protection combined with the provision of adaptive equipment to improve grip strength and function [10] .
This study investigates the prevalence of hand OA in a patient population with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) at baseline and one year after the administration of a multi-professional OA educational program and conservative OA treatment. Correlations were identified between symptoms, BMI changes, health and function questionnaires of the upper limbs, and direct measures of grip strength.
2. Methods
Design: This study was an epidemiological study of the prevalence of hand OA in two stages (baseline and 1 year) following educational intervention and clinical therapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis. It was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Analysis of Research Projects (CAPPesq) under protocol number 0622/11.
Clinical Trials registration number: NCT01572051.
2.1. Participants
Participants were patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) under usual clinical care at the osteometabolic group since 2010. By November 2011, 306 patients were under usual care for KOA and were invitedin 2012 to participate in a multi-professional educational program for the treatment of OA (Orthopedics Institute, Hospital das Clinicas, University of São Paulo) [11] .
The patients met the following criteria: outpatient aged 45 years or older with KOA according to the American College of Rheumatology clinical and radiological definition [12] ; no rheumatoid arthritis or any other rheumatologic disease other than OA; received usual care for OA during the past six months; knee pain rated above 30 mm on a numerical scale and necessitating drug treatment; no neurological problems; able to understand, agree and sign the informed consent and the questionnaires (irrespective of their level of education); and agree and be evaluated by the occupational therapy team. The exclusion criteria included missing evaluations; performing hand surgery during the evaluation period; or engaging in another clinical trial.
2.2. Intervention
Participants were evaluated for their upper limb abilities. At baseline in February 2012, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire instruments (HAQ) [13] and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) [14] [15] were utilized. The patients were evaluated for grip strength with a Jamar dynamometer. Key pinch strength, tripod pinch and pulp-pulp pinch were evaluated using a B & L Pinch-gauge. The force was established by averaging three attempts. The tests were performed bilaterally. The presence of deviations or deformities of the hands were evaluated. Those patients with indications for hand, wrist and/or finger orthotics received prescriptions for the devices. All participating patients were measured (height and weight), and BMI was calculated.
Between March and May (2012), the patients received educational material (booklet and DVD) and/or attended two days of classes with 7 different professional teams (orthopedic surgeons, psychology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, physical fitness, nutritionist and social workers) regarding OA, its causes and modalities of treatment [11] . The importance of diet, exercise and medication was emphasized. Regarding occupational therapy, the patients were instructed on joint protection methods during activities of daily living and the importance of alternating activities with different levels of energy expenditure. This was performed in a 50 minute class and a one hour workshop with a simulated house (kitchen, living room, bathroom, bedroom and tools room (this one for the men) (Figures 1-5) in the first day of lecture. In the second day of lecture, patients were enrolled in one-hour workshop to alternate activities of different levels of energy expenditure in their weekly routine.
After 12 months, the patients were again subjected to the HAQ and DASH questionnaires, and the handgrip and pinch strength measurements were repeated using the same instruments and BMI calculations.
Keep your back straight, lengthens the handle of the broom and shovel
Twist towels hooking on tap and rolling it up using both hands. Avoid rubbing the clothes, prefer to use washing machine
Thickeners of different diameters are used to reduce the strength necessary to clamp or gripping during manipulation of tools used in daily activities (broomstick, comb, brush, pen, toothbrush), thereby reducing joint overloading of the fingers and thumb base
How to sleep sideways
Do one task at a time
2.3. Simple Size
This was a sub-project of a thematic study evaluating the effects of multi-professional education for KOA clinical treatment. The sample size included all patients that agreed to participate and were actually evaluated by the occupational therapy group. It is part of a pilot study [11] .
2.4. Statistics
The HAQ, DASH and strength measurements were calculated. Pearson’s correlations were calculated between the changes in BMI and changes in scales and force measurements. Data from patients that missed the second (one-year reassessment) evaluation were not analyzed.
Two groups of patients were created, patients with no change or increased BMI and patients that reduced BMI. The HAQ and DASH values and force measurements at each time point were calculated for both groups using summary measures (means, standard deviations and 95% confidence intervals). These values were compared between groups and between time points with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures (two factors) followed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons when necessary.
ANOVA with repeated measures (two factors) for scales and force measurements between time points and according to the presence of symptoms at baseline and one year were conducted separately.
The tests were performed at the 5% significance level.
3. Results
The occupational therapy group evaluated 195 (at baseline) of the initial 228 patients (85.53%) that accepted to participate, and 192 patients (98.5% of the patients included) were evaluated at one year. One patient died, and two patients abandoned the study.
Of the 195 patients evaluated by occupational therapy at baseline, 45 (23.7%, 11 men and 34 women) had some involvement of the hands. We observed symptoms and characteristics of first carpometacarpal joint arthritis, deviations and nodes, pain in the fingers and wrist, trigger finger, carpal tunnel syndrome, joint stiffness and swan neck deformity. Some of these patients had more than one symptom. At re-assessment, 15 patients had no hand symptoms, and 30 patients continued to present symptoms. At one year, 91 patients (47.4%) complained of hand symptoms (61 patients were previously asymptomatic at baseline).
When comparing these patients regarding the presence of symptoms at baseline and one year (i.e., symptoms at baseline and one year; symptoms at baseline but not at one year; no symptoms at baseline but symptoms at one year; no symptoms at baseline and at one year), there were no differences in age (average of 62, 64, 63 and 63, respectively); BMI (average baseline BMI of 33, 34, 32 and 34 and one-year BMI of 32, 34, 32 and 34, respectively); changes in BMI; or changes in HAQ. The DASH results improved most in those patients that remained symptomatic (from 39 to 33). Those that remained asymptomatic improved the least (from 28 to 27) but had the best results. Patients only initially symptomatic improved from 40 to 38 (worst results). Patients who became symptomatic improved from 35 to 32.
Table 1 presents the results of the HAQ, DASH and grip and pinch strength at baseline and after 12 months.
The actual decrease in BMI was very small. Only 15 patients decreased more than 2 points in their BMI. However, the HAQ results from patients who did not change or increased their BMI increased, whereas patients who reduced their BMI improved, i.e., decreased (p = 0.041). The DASH improved and the force on the right and left tripod pinch worsened in all patients regardless of the variation in BMI (p = 0.012, p = 0.001 and p = 0.032, respectively). The other force measurements indicated no significant changes throughout the study or with respect to groups that decreased BMI or not (p > 0.05).
There were no significant correlations between the changes in BMI and changes in HAQ or DASH scales (p = 0.314 and p = 0.168, respectively) or with the variations of force measures (p > 0.05). The HAQ changes were inversely correlated with the baseline BMI (i.e., higher initial BMI was related to less improvement in the HAQ). The correlation was weak (r = −0.148, p = 0.041).
The DASH results (Table 2) improved irrespective of the symptoms at baseline (p = 0.015 and p = 0.004). The right and left tripod pinch and left pulp-pulp pinch had higher mean values in patients without symptoms at baseline (p = 0.048, p = 0.045 and 0.033, respectively).
The force measurements on the left hand, except grip, had lower mean values in patients with symptoms at one year (p < 0.05), Table 2.
Description of scales and measures of force according to the time of assessment and changes in BMI (decreased, increased or unchanged)
Variable
Moment
BMI Variation
Unchanged or Increase
Reduction
Mean
SD
CI (95%)
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Mean
SD
CI (95%)
Median
Minimum
Maximum
N
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
HAQ
Baseline
0.76
0.46
0.64
0.87
0.70
0.05
2.20
62
0.86
0.49
0.77
0.94
0.85
0.00
2.60
128
12 Months
0.94
1.40
0.59
1.29
0.68
0.00
11.00
62
0.77
0.45
0.69
0.85
0.73
0.00
2.40
128
DASH
Baseline
32.84
20.18
27.73
37.94
31.25
0.00
86.66
60
34.01
20.70
30.32
37.70
32.75
0.00
89.81
121
12 Months
30.46
21.81
24.94
35.97
26.63
0.00
86.60
60
30.95
19.49
27.48
34.42
30.55
0.00
75.83
121
Right Palmar Grip
Baseline
21.70
10.08
19.10
24.29
20.00
3.30
52.60
58
22.96
10.09
21.18
24.74
22.32
3.60
67.30
124
12 Months
21.25
9.48
18.81
23.69
20.00
2.16
46.66
58
22.57
8.98
20.99
24.15
21.33
5.30
46.50
124
Right Pulp to Pulp Pinch
Baseline
4.14
1.87
3.67
4.62
4.00
0.20
9.10
60
4.18
1.85
3.85
4.50
3.80
0.30
12.00
125
12 Months
4.05
1.94
3.56
4.54
4.00
0.00
9.00
60
4.17
1.67
3.88
4.46
4.00
1.00
12.00
125
Right Key Pinch
Baseline
6.46
2.57
5.81
7.11
6.48
1.00
14.00
60
6.48
2.54
6.03
6.93
6.30
1.00
15.00
125
12 Months
6.37
2.51
5.73
7.01
6.08
1.00
13.00
60
6.43
2.45
6.00
6.86
6.30
1.00
15.00
125
Right Tripods Pinch
Baseline
5.18
2.20
4.63
5.74
4.82
0.50
12.00
60
5.31
2.18
4.93
5.69
5.00
0.60
12.00
125
12 Months
4.84
2.23
4.28
5.40
4.50
1.00
10.00
60
5.02
2.01
4.67
5.37
4.66
0.00
12.00
125
Left Palmar Grip
Baseline
22.18
9.39
19.76
24.60
20.48
4.00
52.00
58
22.88
10.49
21.03
24.73
22.00
6.00
77.00
123
12 Months
21.52
8.95
19.22
23.82
20.17
6.00
48.00
58
22.33
9.46
20.66
24.00
20.66
3.00
61.00
123
Left Pulp to Pulp Pinch
Baseline
4.01
1.68
3.58
4.43
4.00
0.60
8.60
60
3.88
1.68
3.59
4.18
3.50
1.00
8.60
124
12 Months
3.85
1.67
3.43
4.27
3.83
0.16
9.50
60
3.79
1.50
3.53
4.06
3.50
1.00
9.00
124
Left Key Pinch
Baseline
6.06
2.26
5.48
6.63
6.00
0.50
12.60
59
6.00
2.32
5.59
6.41
5.60
1.20
13.30
124
12 Months
5.97
2.31
5.38
6.56
5.66
1.00
14.00
59
6.01
2.32
5.60
6.42
5.63
2.00
14.00
124
Left Tripod Pinch
Baseline
5.11
2.07
4.59
5.64
4.83
0.10
12.00
60
4.87
1.89
4.53
5.20
4.60
1.00
10.60
123
12 Months
4.84
1.94
4.35
5.33
4.66
0.50
9.83
60
4.75
1.73
4.44
5.05
4.50
1.66
10.60
123
Changes in strength and functional results (DASH) occurred irrespective of symptoms.
4. Discussion
The present study demonstrated that the prevalence and incidence of hOA is high in a population of patients already diagnosed with KOA, which supports the idea that OA is a systemic disease not just localized. Moreover, this study demonstrated initial prevalence rates of 23.7%. Following 12 months, the prevalence was 47.4%. These rates were higher than reported for older patients, where the prevalence of OA is higher [16] .
The hypothesis that decreased BMI generates improved function and joint pain was proven correct when analyzing the HAQ overall strength score. Patients that decreased BMI improved function, whereas patients who
Description of scales and measures of force according to lack or presence of hand symptoms at baseline and one year according to the lack or presence of hand symptoms at one year and their respective results at baseline
Variable
Moment
Baseline Symptoms
1 Year Symptoms
No
Yes
No
Yes
Mean
SD
CI (95%)
N
Mean
SD
CI (95%)
N
Mean
SD
IC (95%)
N
Mean
SD
CI (95%)
N
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
HAQ
Baseline
0.78
0.48
0.70
0.85
150
0.97
0.44
0.84
1.10
45
0.80
0.48
0.71
0.89
103
0.85
0.48
0.75
0.94
92
12 Months
0.81
0.97
0.65
0.97
147
0.87
0.49
0.73
1.02
45
0.75
0.43
0.66
0.83
101
0.91
1.19
0.67
1.15
91
DASH
Baseline
31.01
19.74
27.86
34.17
150
39.84
20.56
33.77
45.92
44
30.20
20.01
26.36
34.05
104
36.27
20.07
32.12
40.41
90
12 Months
29.10
19.94
25.81
32.40
141
36.55
20.13
30.46
42.64
42
28.78
19.18
24.95
32.54
98
33.19
21.14
28.70
37.69
85
Right Palmar Grip
Baseline
22.72
9.61
21.15
24.29
144
21.63
11.07
18.35
24.90
44
22.83
9.91
20.85
24.81
96
22.08
10.04
20.02
24.13
92
12 Months
22.83
9.25
21.30
24.36
140
20.16
8.60
17.65
22.68
45
22.73
9.94
20.72
24.74
94
21.61
8.26
19.92
23.31
91
Right Pulp to Pulp Pinch
Baseline
4.30
1.87
3.99
4.60
145
3.63
1.65
3.14
4.11
45
4.32
1.93
3.94
4.70
98
3.94
1.72
3.59
4.30
92
12 Months
4.22
1.86
3.91
4.53
141
3.80
1.36
3.40
4.20
45
4.38
1.92
3.99
4.77
95
3.85
1.54
3.53
4.17
91
Right Key Pinch
Baseline
6.48
2.48
6.08
6.88
145
6.24
2.72
5.44
7.04
45
6.54
2.59
6.03
7.05
98
6.29
2.48
5.78
6.80
92
12 Months
6.52
2.47
6.11
6.93
141
6.06
2.39
5.36
6.76
45
6.67
2.57
6.15
7.19
95
6.14
2.30
5.67
6.61
91
Right Tripod Pinch
Baseline
5.38
2.17
5.02
5.76
145
4.84
2.14
4.21
5.46
45
5.41
2.21
4.97
5.85
98
5.08
2.12
4.64
5.51
92
12 Months
5.16
2.15
4.81
5.51
141
4.34
1.69
3.85
4.83
45
5.26
2.18
4.82
5.70
95
4.64
1.91
4.25
5.03
91
Left Palmar Grip
Baseline
22.74
9.30
21.22
24.26
144
22.00
12.04
18.44
25.56
44
22.97
9.75
21.02
24.92
96
22.16
10.25
20.07
24.25
92
12 Months
22.34
8.95
20.85
23.83
139
21.57
10.37
18.54
24.60
45
22.62
9.58
20.67
24.57
93
21.67
9.07
19.82
23.52
91
Left Pulp to Pulp Pinch
Baseline
4.04
1.64
3.77
4.31
144
3.45
1.68
2.96
3.94
45
4.16
1.68
3.82
4.49
97
3.63
1.61
3.30
3.95
92
12 Months
3.93
1.63
3.66
4.20
139
3.44
1.25
3.07
3.80
45
4.11
1.65
3.78
4.45
93
3.50
1.40
3.21
3.79
91
Left Key Pinch
Baseline
6.09
2.20
5.73
6.45
143
5.70
2.55
4.95
6.44
45
6.30
2.23
5.86
6.75
97
5.67
2.31
5.20
6.14
91
12 Months
6.16
2.25
5.79
6.53
139
5.47
2.44
4.76
6.18
45
6.35
2.31
5.88
6.82
93
5.62
2.26
5.16
6.08
91
Left Tripod Pinch
Baseline
5.09
1.90
4.78
5.40
143
4.43
1.97
3.86
5.01
45
5.17
1.85
4.80
5.54
96
4.68
1.99
4.28
5.09
92
12 Months
4.91
1.82
4.61
5.21
138
4.37
1.70
3.87
4.86
45
5.07
1.82
4.70
5.44
92
4.48
1.74
4.13
4.84
91
did not decrease their BMI worsened (Table 1). Of the patients who improved, those with higher baseline BMIs improved less.
The DASH score, which assesses the ability of the upper limbs, demonstrated improvements in all patient populations, regardless of BMI or symptoms. Similarly, the right and left tripod pinch forces also changed in all patients but with decreased strength (Table 1 and Table 2). Interestingly, patients without symptoms had stronger hands.
Although patients improved on subjective scores (improved function globally via treatment and education regarding the disease), they generally lost strength in their hands, and the prevalence of hand complaints increased. Subjective improvements combined with worsening objective data creates doubt regarding the reliability of the answers obtained from patients or regarding the quality of the program. The program may need to include more specific hand exercises to avoid pinch weakening. Teaching hand exercises by occupational therapists is the best cost-benefit treatment for hOA [17] .
Our study has limitations. Our patients were diagnosed with hOA only by anamnesis, physical examination, and without the use of radiographs. This study was also an epidemiological study that evaluated only the prevalence and incidence of hOA. The use of orthotics was not controlled. One third of the patients were initially symptomatic and had no symptoms at one year. This result was probably due to the treatment because there was no significant difference in BMI, changes in BMI, and exercise (data not shown) from the 15 patients that improved and the 30 patients that remained with pain. Our patients were obese with a low educational level and most of them were laborers but this was not studied at this point. The duration of obesity was not registered. However, the study did indicate a higher than expected prevalence of patients with hand OA when seeking treatment for KOA [18] .
In summary, the incidence of the disease increased during the study irrespective of drugs or educational program. Changes in strength and functional results (DASH) occurred irrespective of the symptoms and BMI changes. The program should be adapted to improve hand strength.
5. Conclusion
The prevalence of hand OA increased during an educational program for patients with OA irrespective of improved upper limb function or BMI changes. Patients with decreased BMIs (following one year) demonstrated improved global strength.
Ethical Approval
This study was conducted under the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Analysis of Research Projects (CAPPesq) under protocol number 0622/11. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT01572051.
Contributors
VCK performed data analysis and manuscript writing. DSS, RMS, LCA, NLRB contributed to the study design, data collection, and manuscript editing. MUR contributed to the study design, data collection, analysis and manuscript writing/editing.
Acknowledgements
This study could not have been performed without the voluntary help of Heloísa Ungaro, Paulo Dallari, Miriam Damaris Di Maio, Alípio Jose Gusmão dos Santos, Pérola Grinberg Plapler; the secretaries (especially, Suellen Lima, Natalia Borges, Abel Narciso Telecesqui, Rosilane Z. Castro Dutra and Mercedes Alves Coutinho); occupational therapist team; social workers; physical therapists; psychologists; physical educators; and security staff of Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Orthopedics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo .
Funding
This Study was funded by TRB PharmaTM-Brazil and the Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, which had no role in the project design, implementation, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or manuscript writing.
Conflicts of Interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Cite this paper
Vinicius CanelloKuhn,Danieledos Santos Scarcella,Rosana MayumiSuzuki,Ligia Cortezde Almeida,Nádia Lucila RochaBrito,Marcia Uchoade Rezende, (2016) Prevalence and Incidence of Hand Osteoarthritis and Upper Limb Complaints in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis. Correlations among Functionality, Grip Strength, Changes in Body Mass Index and Symptoms among Patients in an Educational Osteoarthritis Program. Open Journal of Orthopedics,06,1-9. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2016.61001
ReferencesTowheed, T.E. (2005) Systematic Review of Therapies for Osteoarthritis of the Hand. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 13, 455-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.02.009Zhang, Y., Niu, J., Kelly-Hayes, M., Chaisson, C.E., Aliabadi, P. and Felson, D.T. (2002) Prevalence of Symptomatic Hand Osteoarthritis and Its Impact on Functional Status among the Elderly. The Framingham Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156, 1021e7.Kloppenburg, M. (2007) Hand Osteoarthritis—An Increasing Need for Treatment and Rehabilitation. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 19, 179-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0b013e32802106a8Rezende, M.U. and Campos, G.C. (2013) Is Osteoarthritis a Mechanical or Inflammatory Disease? Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, 48, 471-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbo.2013.03.003Ray, L., Lipton, R.B., Zimmerman, M.E., Katz, M.J. and Derby, C.A. (2011) Mechanisms of Association between Obesity and Chronic Pain in the Elderly. Pain, 152, 53-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.043Gabaya, O., Halla, D.J., Berenbaumb, F., Henrotinc, Y. and Sanchezc, C. (2008) Osteoarthritis and Obesity: Experimental Models. Joint Bone Spine, 75, 675-679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.07.011Yusuf, E. (2012) Metabolic Factors in Osteoarthritis: Obese People Do Not Walk on Their Hands. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 14, 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3894Grotle, M., Hagen, K.B., Natvig, B., Dahl, F.A. and Kvien, T.K. (2008) Obesity and Osteoarthritis in Knee, Hip and/or Hand: An Epidemiological Study in the General Population with 10 Years Follow-Up. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, 132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-132Carman, W.J., Sowers, M., Hawthorne, V.M. and Weissfeld, L.A. (1994) Obesity as a Risk Factor for Osteoarthritis of the Hand and Wrist: A Prospective Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 139, 119-129.Valdes, K. and Marik, T. (2010) A Systematic Review of Conservative Interventions for Osteoarthritis of the Hand. Journal of Hand Therapy, 23, 334-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2010.05.001Rezende, M.U., Campos, G.C., Pailo, A.F., Frucchi, R., Pasqualin, T. and Camargo, O.P. (2013) PARQVE-Project Arthritis Recovering Quality of Life by Means of Education Short-term Outcomes in a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Arthritis, 2, 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-7921.1000113Altman, R., Asch, E., Bloch, D., Bole, G., Borenstein, D., Brandt, K., et al. (1986) Development of Criteria for the Classification and Reporting Os Osteoarthritis: Classification of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 29, 1039-1049.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/art.1780290816Ferraz, M.B., Oliveira, L.M., Araujo, P.M.P. and Atra, E. (1990) Class Cultural Reliability of the Physical Ability Dimension of the Health Assessment Questionary. Journal of Rheumatology, 17, 813-817.Hudak, P.L., Amadio, P.C. and Bombardier, C. (1996) Development of an Upper Extremity Outcome Measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29, 602-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-LOrfale, A.G., Araújo, P.M.P., Ferraz, M.B. and Natour, J. (2005) Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, Cultural Adaptation and Evaluation of the Reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 38, 293-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2005000200018Pereira, D., Peleteiro, B., Araujo, J., Branco, J., Santos, R.A. and Ramos, E. (2011) The Effect of Osteoarthritis Definition on Prevalence and Incidence Estimates: A Systematic Review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 19, 1270-1285.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009Oppong, R., Jowett, S., Nicholls, E., Whitehurst, D.G., Hill, S., Hammond, A., et al. (2015) Joint Protection and Hand Exercises for Hand Osteoarthritis: An Economic Evaluation Comparing Methods for the Analysis of Factorial Trials. Rheumatology, 54, 876-883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu389Magnusson, K., Osteras, N., Haugen, I.K., Mowinckel, P., Nordsletten, L., Natvig, B., et al. (2014) No Strong Relationship between Body Mass Index and Clinical Hand Osteo-arthritis: Results from a Population-Based Case-Control Study. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, 43, 409-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2014.900700