<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2016.41002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-62394</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessment of Physicochemical Characteristics of Sediment from Nwaja Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>deola</surname><given-names>Alex Adesuyi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moses</surname><given-names>Okafor Ngwoke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Modupe</surname><given-names>Olatunde Akinola</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kelechi</surname><given-names>Longinus Njoku</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Anuoluwapo</surname><given-names>Omosileola Jolaoso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Environmental Impact Assessment, Environment Department, Shell Petroleum Development Company,Port Harcourt, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Environmental Biology Unit, Cell Biology and Genetics Department, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>biologistalex@gmail.com(DAA)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>16</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>27</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Sediments are complex environments, with varying physicochemical characteristics, such as composition and type of organic matter, particle size distribution, and pH. Contaminated sediment is a significant environmental problem affecting many marine, estuarine and freshwater environments throughout the world. Most assessments of water quality have historically focused on water-soluble compounds, with relatively little attention paid to sediment. The aim of this research is to assess the physical and chemical parameters of sediments from Nwaja Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Monitoring of this sediment quality is an important part of preserving and restoring the biological integrity of water bodies as well as protecting aquatic life, wild life and human health. Sediment samples from Nwaja Creek were sampled from seven sampling stations along the creek for over three months May to July, 2015, rainfall peak period, for assessment of their physical and chemical characteristics, such as grain size, organic carbon, pH, conductivity, nitrate and phosphate. These parameters are known to influence the interactions and dynamics of pollutants within sediment matrix. Sediment particle size distribution indicates that they have higher proportion of clay (clay &gt; silt &gt; sand), the mean percentage composition of clay, silt and sand ranged between 64.28% &#177; 22.04% - 72.36% &#177; 14.00%, 18.71% &#177; 12.03% - 27.32% &#177; 22.17% and 8.40% &#177; 6.28% - 9.76% &#177; 4.59% respectively. TOC in the study area is generally above 1% across all stations during the study period with a range between 0.98% and 4.58%. Minimal monthly and spatial variations are observed in particle distribution, pH (3.9 - 8.5) and phosphate (5.5 - 15.5 kg/mg) while significant variations are observed in conductivity (23.0 - 567.0 uS/cm), total organic carbon (0.98% - 4.58%) and nitrate (0.45 - 11.9 mg/kg) concentration. It is concluded that physicochemical characteristics of the sediments from Nwaja Creek are influenced by anthropogenic sources rather than natural as shown by the elevated phosphate and nitrate levels because the Niger Delta geology is not essentially rich in nitrate and its excess in surface or groundwater is considered as pollutant.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sediments</kwd><kwd> physicochemical Assessment</kwd><kwd> Nwaja Creek</kwd><kwd> Nitrates</kwd><kwd> Conductivity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In Nigeria’s Niger Delta, the challenges of water (surface and ground) and sediment pollution have been of concern to all stakeholders because of the rate and extent of impairment of the environment and aquatic bodies by human activities, particularly from industrial and domestic sources. Oil production and its other associated activities in the Niger Delta have increased the population growth rate in the region and also the volumes of waste generated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref1">1</xref>] . The Niger Delta is the richest part of Nigeria in terms of natural resources with large deposits of hydrocarbon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Sediment is the loose sand, silt and other soil particles that settle at the bottom of a body of water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref4">4</xref>] . Sediment strata serve as an important habitat for the benthic macro invertebrates whose metabolic activities contribute to aquatic productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref5">5</xref>] . Sediment is also the major site for organic matter decomposition which is largely carried out by bacteria. Important macro-nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorous are continuously being interchanged between sediment and overlying water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref5">5</xref>] . Sediment input may impact stream communities through a variety of direct and indirect processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref6">6</xref>] , including reduced light penetration, smothering, habitat reduction and introduction of absorbed pollutants (pesticides, metals, nutrients). The structure of the sediments in the intertidal zone plays a major role in the distribution of the organisms that live in or on them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref7">7</xref>] . Benthic organisms show habitat preference for specific types of sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref8">8</xref>] . The physicochemical parameters of the sediments such as salinity, dissolved oxygen, pH, and organic carbon can also influence the occurrence and abundance of species distributed in them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref9">9</xref>] . Sediment also serves as reservoir for pollutants and therefore a potential source of pollutants to the water column, organisms, and ultimately human consumers of those organisms. Contaminated sediment can cause lethal and sub-lethal effect in benthic and other sediment associated organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Fine grained sediment (silt + clay) is responsible for a significant proportion of the annual transport of metals, phosphorus, chlorinated pesticides and many industrial compounds such as polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxins and furans. Of the 128 priority pollutants listed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref10">10</xref>] , 65 percent are found mainly, or exclusively, in association with sediment and biota. Consequently, water quality programmes that focus only on the water phase miss most of the more toxic contaminants. In North America, it has been found that up to 95 percent of the annual phosphorus load in rivers is transported in association with suspended sediment. Organic micropollutants are mainly bound to the organic component of the suspended matter, which is commonly measured as total organic carbon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Monitoring sediment quality is an important part of preserving and restoring the biological integrity of our Nation’s water as well as protecting aquatic life, wild life and human health. Sediment is an integral component of aquatic ecosystem providing habitat, feeding, spawning and rearing areas for many aquatic organisms. Results from studying the sediment physical and chemical characteristics from Nwaja River in the Niger Delta area of Nigeria will facilitate the management of the water and similar water bodies. It will also provide base line data for further studies.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Port Harcourt is located within the Niger Delta Basin of Southern Nigeria. It’s located within the eastern lower Niger Delta in the south eastern part of Rivers State of Nigeria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). It is situated at the right bank of the Bonny River approximately 65 km inland from the Bight of Bonny. Geographically, the area lies between latitudes 4030' and 5000'N and longitudes 6045' and 7030'E. It is bounded on the East and West by meandering Creeks, on the South by first the block-yard creeks, then the Bonny River and finally mangrove swamps and on the north by Abia State. The southern part of the town stands largely on raised levees with silts and clay foundation. These afford permanently dry and firm points within the zone of its fresh water swamps of the Niger Delta. It covers an area of 290 km<sup>2</sup> and the mean annual temperature is about 28˚C. Nwaja Creek is in the upper Bonny Estuary of the Niger Delta. Seven sampling stations (S1-S7) were located along the Nwaja Creek, to cover all land-based sources of contaminant inputs into the creek as well as presumably uncontaminated locations (Fig- ure 2). The sampling stations and their geographical coordinates were all recorded and documented (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Showing river state, Niger Delta, Nigeria (Source: Google earth image)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Map showing sampling stations (Source: Google earth map)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Nwaja creek sampling stations GPS coordinates</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >S/n</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling station code</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015592</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.809313</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015585</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.809011</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015562</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.808353</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015752</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.807685</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015805</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.807083</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.806236</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.015919</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.805435</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Analyses</title><p>The study adopted both field and laboratory based procedures to generate the data required. Surface water samples were obtained at seven sampling stations (S1 to S7) located at equal distances of 100 km along the stretch of Nwaja creek. Sediment samples were collected monthly with an Ekman grab (15 cm by 15 cm) at each of the stations for a period of 3 months from May to July 2015 (rainfall peak period). Replicate grabs samples were collected for particle size analysis and physicochemical analysis of the sediment. These were transported to the laboratory in ice-cooled boxes.</p><p>The sediment samples were air-dried, sieved and used to perform the following physicochemical analysis except pH and conductivity for which wet samples were analyzed. The Bouyoucos hydrometer method was used for the particle size analysis. The pH and conductivity of the sediment were determined using a meter (model H1 8314, membrane HANNA instrument). The sediment samples were mixed in a ratio of 1:1 with distilled water in a beaker before inserting the probes. Readings were taken after allowing the instrument to stabilize. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in percentage was determined by the wet combustion method of Walkley and Black method of ASTM and APHA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref12">12</xref>] . Nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub>) levels in sediment were determined following the Brucine Method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref13">13</xref>] , while available phosphorus in sediment was determined by Bray and Kurt method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis</title><p>One-way ANOVA and correlation analyses were used for statistical analysis of each sediment variable.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The results of the particle size distribution of the sediments (mean percentage in months and stations) are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and they are observed to be clay &gt; silt &gt; sand. The mean monthly percentage composition of clay, silt and sand ranged between 64.28% &#177; 22.04% - 72.36% &#177;14.00%, 18.71% &#177; 12.03% - 27.32% &#177; 22.17% and 8.40% &#177; 6.28% - 9.76% &#177; 4.59% respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The highest percentage of clay (90.55%) was recorded at station 3 in the month of May while the least (35.89%) was recorded at station 7 also in the month of May. The lowest value (6.6%) of silt particle was observed at station 3 in the month of May while the highest mean value (60.95%) in the same month was at station 7. The highest value of sand (22.40%) was observed at station 1 in July and the least (2.85%) at station 3 in May. There were no significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in sediment stations and months for clay, silt and sand for this study in Nwaja Creek.</p><p>The metal concentration level of heavy metals in plant samples is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The mean monthly pH values for sediment are 5.39 &#177; 1.16 in May, 6.54 &#177; 0.95 in June and 4.65 &#177; 0.65 in July. The highest pH (8.50) was recorded at station 2 in the month of May and the least (3.90) at station 2 in the month of July (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). There were spatial and monthly significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in pH level of the study area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Minimal variations in stations and months were observed in the pH of sediments in the study area.</p><p>High variations were observed in stations and months for the mean conductivity values of the sediments. Mean values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) obtained for months ranged between 44.98 &#177; 20.79 uS/cm (July) and 266.21 &#177; 151.62 uS/cm (May) while for stations ranged between 79.50 &#177; 64.97 (Station 6) and 280.83 &#177; 253.19 uS/cm. The highest conductivity (567.0 uS/cm) was recorded at station 1 in the month of May while the least (23.0 uS/cm)</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sediments composition and particle sizes (%)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >May</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >June</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >July</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silt (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sand (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silt (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Sand (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silt (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >7.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >18.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >10.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >15.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >5.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.71</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Station 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical parameters of sediments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Month</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 4</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 5</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 6</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Statn 7</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.394286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.535714</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94912</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.654286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.653449</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.74666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.73333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.32666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77468273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83022767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19926366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.530795</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99851556</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.94585059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05076163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Conductivity (uS/cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >567</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >290.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266.2143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >151.6299</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >158.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.2143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.64985</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.98571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.79987</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >280.833333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.166667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.3333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107.566667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253.19349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.0897394</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.814518</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.0287917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.902491</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.9749952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.0753432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Organic carbon (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.784286</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.987672</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.115714</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.701923</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.618571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08215</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.67666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.03333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65666667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53285137</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96109313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50013332</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60682232</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46457866</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.79000931</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33570206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Phosphate (mg/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.82143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.155828</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.585714</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.720367</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.775714</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.428634</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.57333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8466667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.76333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.8133333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57078458</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.32763215</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92841904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.06633331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20084692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5376593</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.20304651</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Nitrate (mg/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >May</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.131075</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >June</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.217032</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >July</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.057143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.616567</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mean</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1033333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8833333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.9333333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4033333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.170057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.626445</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7680781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4476179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7885181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7696646</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7039213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mean particle size distribution of sediments.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x10.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mean pH values (monthly and station).</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x12.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Mean conductivity (monthly and station).</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x14.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>was recorded at station 6. There were significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in conductivity across stations and months in this study of Nwaja Creek sediments.</p><p>The values of total organic carbon in the study area varied greatly in months and across stations with higher values observed during the month of May (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). The TOC values in the study area were generally above 1% across all stations during the study period. The lowest mean value recorded was at station 3 (1.99% &#177; 0.5%) while the highest mean value was at station 6 (3.65% &#177; 1.79%). In mean monthly variation, the month of May had the highest mean (3.78% &#177; 0.98%) while the month of June had the lowest mean (2.11% &#177; 0.70%). Significant differences were observed in the ANOVA results between stations and months (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>The mean monthly Phosphate level in Nwaja sediment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>) ranged between 7.77 &#177; 1.42 mg/kg (July) and 12.82 &#177; 3.15 mg/kg (May) while the mean phosphate level across stations ranged between 6.76 &#177; 1.20 mg/kg (station 5) and 12.29 &#177; 4.20 mg/kg (station 7). The highest value of phosphate was recorded at station 7 (16.89 mg/kg) in the month of May while the least at station 5 (5.50 mg/kg) in the month of July. Phosphate levels in this study were recorded to be higher than nitrate concentration. ANOVA showed significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) in mean phosphate concentrations between stations and months, and significant interaction between months and locations.</p><p>The nitrate level in Nwaja Creek was quite high and varied across the study stations and sampling months (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>). The mean monthly concentration of nitrate in sediment varied between 2.33 &#177; 1.21 mg/kg in June and 6.82 &#177; 3.13 mg/kg in May. Mean concentration across the stations varied between 2.49 &#177; 1.76 mg/kg in station 3 and 6.67 &#177; 4.76 mg/kg in station 6. Significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) were observed in Nitrates between stations and across all the sampling points.</p><p>Correlation between variables in sediment samples is shown in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. The relationship between pH and conductivity, organic carbon and conductivity, phosphate and pH, Nitrate and organic carbon; and Nitrate and phosphate were all positively correlated. However the correlation between organic carbon and pH, phosphate and conductivity, phosphate and organic carbon, nitrate and pH; and nitrate and conductivity were all negatively correlated. These relations were statistically not significant and it shows weak relationship among the variables. Thecorrelation between soil and plant for all the metals are all positive. These relations</p><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Mean organic carbon (monthly and station).</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x15.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x16.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Mean phosphate (mg/kg) in stations and months.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x17.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig7_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x18.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig8"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Mean nitrate (mg/kg) in months and station.</title></caption><fig id ="fig8_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x19.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig8_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x20.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical parameters correlation map</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2170101x21.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation table for studied variables</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity (uS/cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Organic carbon (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphate (mg/kg)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrate (mg/kg)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity (uS/cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Organic carbon (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1929</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0323</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphate (mg/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0892</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3412</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrate (mg/kg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5509</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4895</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>were significant for copper, iron, lead and cadmium (r = 0.718, r = 0.644, r = 0.705 and r = 0.010 respectively) but not significant for zinc (0.030).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Sediments with fine particles provide better surface areas for pollutants to adsorb than those with coarse particles. The nature of the sediment and the organic matter composition also determine the benthic community structure found in particular sediments. Grain size analyses show that sediments from the Nwaja Creek were generally clay &gt; silt &gt; sandy in nature with the texture characteristics being fairly constant over the study period. All sampling stations had more clay-silt compositions except in the month of May at station 7. The mean percentage values for clay, silt and sand in this study compared favourably with the observation of Daka and Moslen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref15">15</xref>] who recorded mean spatial values ranging from 0.4% &#177; 0.42% - 45.85% &#177; 2.16%, 1.57% &#177; 0.49% - 54.50% &#177; 6.37% and 5.51% &#177; 2.68% - 96.70% &#177; 1.98% for sand, silt and clay respectively. The study revealed that the particle size of the sediments of Nwaja River were generally sandy mud in nature.</p><p>There were minimal monthly and spatial variations in the mean pH values of sediment in the study area. pH values were higher during the month of June and lower in the month of July. Station 2 had the highest pH value in the month of May, station 4 in the month of June and station 4 also in the month of July. The values obtained for sediment pH levels during this study were consistent with those of Daka et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref16">16</xref>] who recorded range between of 2.5 - 3.5 in Azuabie creek of the upper Bonny Estuary. These values are acidic and would pose serious challenges to organisms in nature. But this study does not compare favourably well with the report of Braide et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref3">3</xref>] who reported alkaline range of 6.9 - 7.8 from the freshwater stream of Minichida stream also in Niger Delta. Whereas Minichida stream sediment is alkaline that of Azuabie and Nwaja is acidic. This might be due to anthropogenic sources such as oil and gas exploration and production, discharge of industrial effluents, domestic and human wastes etc.</p><p>The conductivity of the study area ranged between 23 uS/cm and 567.0 uS/cm. These high variations may be as a result of dilution due to the heavy rainfalls during this period. This compares favorably with the range of 40.0 - 1940.0 uS/cm with a mean of 528.75 uS/cm reported by Ezekiel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref17">17</xref>] in Sombreiro River, Niger Delta.</p><p>The organic carbon content of the study area ranged between 0.98% - 4.58%. This value is similar to those observed in Azuabie Creek (0.82% - 2.16%) by Daka and Moslen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref15">15</xref>] and Sombreiro River (2.02% - 4.1%) by Ezekiel et al. (2011) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref17">17</xref>] . Sediment is a major site for organic matter decomposition which is largely carried out by bacteria. The level of organic matter decomposition may be attributed for the variation in organic carbon content. Fine sediment particles have larger relative surface areas than coarse particles and can absorb colloidal and dissolved organic matter forming sedimentary complexes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref15">15</xref>] . The variation in organic carbon content may be attributed to difference in deposition of organic matter at the various stations.</p><p>Nitrate and phosphates give an indication of the nutrient level in the study area. High variations were observed monthly and also across stations for the concentrations of these nutrients. Domestic waste input from human settlements near these stations and surface run-offs into the creek could be responsible for the appreciably high nutrient level recorded at these stations. Nitrate concentration ranged between 0.45 - 11.9 mg/kg with a mean of 6.18 mg/kg this is in agreement with the range (2.60 - 4.10 mg/kg) recorded by Ezekiel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref17">17</xref>] in a study in the Sombreiro River, Niger Delta, Nigeria. This value is quite high especially when it is compared to the low regional nutrient level of the Niger Delta. The Niger Delta geology is not essentially rich in nitrate and its excess in surface or groundwater is considered as pollutant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref18">18</xref>] . Similarly, the phosphate values (5.5 - 15.5 mg/kg) observed in this study is in a range similar to values obtained by Daka and Moslen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref15">15</xref>] with a mean phosphate concentration of 13.43 mg/kg in a study of Azuabie River sediment. The conditions which affected nitrate concentration also affect phosphate distribution in the stations. Excess phosphate in water is considered a pollutant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref19">19</xref>] . As reported by Adesuyi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62394-ref18">18</xref>] about Nwaja Creek surface water becoming highly polluted with nitrates and phosphates, it’s obvious that this river need to be monitored and assessed regularly to avoid algal bloom and full scale pollution.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Conclusion</title><p>The monitoring of sediment quality is a very important process in the restoration and protection of the biological integrity of our nation’s waters as well as our aquatic/wildlife resources. This study presents the results of the physicochemical quality of the bottom sediment of Nwaja Creek in Niger Delta, Nigeria. Minimal monthly and spatial variations are observed in particle distribution, pH and phosphate while significant variations are observed in conductivity, total organic carbon and nitrate concentration. This observation may be due to anthropogenic influences rather than natural as shown by the elevated nitrate level which is known to be minimal in the geology of the Niger Delta. It is concluded that Nwaja Creek should be constantly monitored for trends in surface water and sediments biological and physicochemical parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The first author acknowledges research support from Shell Petroleum Development Company in Nigeria especially the Environmental Impact Assessment and the University Relations Teams; Ojesanmi Sola, Prof. Gabriel Umoh, Prof. Valerie Nnodu, Ogbanga Belema, Prof. Emmanuel Ukpebor, Timi Tralagba and others too numerous to mention. However, glory to GOD in the highest.</p><p>Adesuyi Adeola Alex is presently a PhD Research Intern in Environmental Impact Assessment, Environmental Department of Shell Petroleum Development Company, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Adeola AlexAdesuyi,Moses OkaforNgwoke,Modupe OlatundeAkinola,Kelechi LonginusNjoku,Anuoluwapo OmosileolaJolaoso, (2016) Assessment of Physicochemical Characteristics of Sediment from Nwaja Creek, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection,04,16-27. doi: 10.4236/gep.2016.41002</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62394-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adesuyi, A.A., Njoku, K.L. and Akinola, M.O. (2015) Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Soils and Vegetation around Selected Industries in Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 3, 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/gep.2015.37002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moffat, D. and Linden, O. (1995) Perception and Reality: Assessing Priorities for Sustainable Development in the Niger Delta, AMBIO. Journal of Human Environment, 24, 527-538.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braide, S.A., Izonfuo, W.A.L., Adakwu, P.U., Chinda, A.C. and Obinwo, C.C. (2004) Water Quality of Miniweja Stream, a Swamp Forest Stream Receiving Non-Point Source Waste Discharge in Eastern Niger Delta, Nigeria. Scientia Africana, 3, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) Water Quality Monitoring for Coffee Creek (Porter County, Indiana). http://www.usepa/research.htm.modecode=62-28-00-00</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abowei, J.F.N. and Sikoki, F.D. (2005) Water Pollution Management and Control. Double Trust Publications Company, Port Harcourt, 236 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oschwald, W. (1972) Sediment-Water Interactions. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1, 360-366. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq1972.00472425000100040005x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ikomi, R.B., Arimoro, F.O. and Odihirin, O.K. (2005) Composition, Distribution and Abundance of Macroinvertebrates of the Upper Reaches of River Ethiope, Delta State, Nigeria. The Zoologist, 3, 68-81.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atabatele, O.E., Morenike, O.A. and Ugwumba, O.A. (2005) Spatial Variation in Physico-Chemical Parameters and Benthic Invertebrate Fauna of River Ogunpa, Ibadan. The Zoologist, 3, 58-67.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">McLusky, D.S. and Elliott, M. (1981) The Feeding and Survival Strategies of Estuarine Molluscs. In: Jones, N.V. and Wolff, W.J., Eds., Feeding and Survival Strategies of Estuarine Organisms, Plenum Press, New York, 109-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3318-0_9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USEPA (2001) Method for Assessing the Chronic Toxicity of Marine and Estuarine Sediment-Associated Contaminants with the Amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington DC. http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/sediments/cs/upload/guidancemanual.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walkley, M. and Black, G.C. (1934) Organic Carbon in Soils and Sediments. Standard Testing Methods for Oil Pollution. ASTM, Philadelphia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA (1995) Standard Methods for the Examination of Waste Water. 14th Edition, APHA, AWIWA-WPCHCF, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA (1998) Standard Methods for the Evaluation of Water and Waste Water. 20th Edition, American Public Health Association Inc., New York, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bray, R.H. and Kurtz, K.T. (1945) Determination of Total Organic and Available Forms of Phosphorus in Soils. Soil Science, 59, 39-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-194501000-00006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daka, E.R. and Moslen, M. (2013) Spatial and Temporal Variation of Physico-Chemical Parameters of Sediment from Azuabie Creek of the Upper Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 5, 219-228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Daka, E.R., Moslen, M., Ekeh, C.A. and Ekweozor, I.K.E. (2007) Sediment Status of Two Creeks in the Upper Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta, in Relation to Urban/Industrial Activities. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 78, 515-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-007-9151-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ezekiel, E.N., Hart, A.I. and Abowei, J.F.N. (2011) The Sediment Physical and Chemical Characteristics in Sombreiro River, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences, 3, 341-349.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adesuyi, A.A., Nnodu, V.C., Njoku, K.L. and Jolaoso, A. (2015) Nitrate and Phosphate Pollution in Surface Water of Nwaja Creek, Port Harcourt, Niger Delta, Nigeria. International Journal of Geology, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, 3, 14-20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62394-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odiete, W.O. (1999) Environmental Physiology of Animals and Pollution. Diversified Resources Lagos, Nigeria.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>