<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2015.311167</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-61290</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  New Exact Solutions of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional AKNS Equation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>epeng</surname><given-names>Sun</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>School of Mathematics and Quantitative Economics, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yepeng@163.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1391</fpage><lpage>1405</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>17</month>	<year>November</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   N-soliton solutions and the bilinear form of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation are obtained by using the Hirota method. Moreover, the double Wronskian solution and generalized double Wronskian solution are constructed through the Wronskian technique. Furthermore, rational solutions, Matveev solutions and complexitons of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation are given through a matrix method for constructing double Wronskian entries. The three solutions are new. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>(2 + 1)-Dimensional AKNS Equation</kwd><kwd> Rational Solutions</kwd><kwd> Matveev Solutions</kwd><kwd> Complexitons</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>It is one of the most important topics to search for exact solutions of nonlinear evolution equations in soliton theory. Moreover, various methods have been developed, such as the inverse scattering transformation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref1">1</xref>] , the Darboux transformation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref2">2</xref>] , the Hirota method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref3">3</xref>] , the Wronskian technique [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref5">5</xref>] , source generation procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref7">7</xref>] and so on. In 1971, Hirota first proposed the formal perturbation technique to obtain N-soliton solution of the KdV equation. Satsuma gave the Wronskian representation of the N-soliton solution to the KdV equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref8">8</xref>] . Then the Wronskian technique was developed by Freeman and Nimmo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref5">5</xref>] . In 1992, Matveev introduced the generalized Wronskian to obtain another kind of exact solutions called Positons for the KdV equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref9">9</xref>] . Recently, Ma first introduced a new kind of exact solution called complexitons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref10">10</xref>] . By using these methods, exact solutions of many nonlinear soliton equations are obtained [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref11">11</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>The AKNS (Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur) equation is one of the most important physical models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref17">17</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref19">19</xref>] . In 1997, Lou and Hu have obtained the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation from the inner parameter dependent symmetry constraints of the KP equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref20">20</xref>] . Moreover, Lou et al. have studied Painlev <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> integrability of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref21">21</xref>] . In this paper, we will apply the Hirota method and the Wronskian technique to obtain new exact solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the bilinear form of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation and its N-soliton solutions are obtained through the Hirota method. In Section 3, the double Wronskian solution and generalized double Wronskian solution are constructed by using the Wronskian technique. In Sections 4 and 5, rational solutions and Matveev solutions are given. In Section 6, complexitons of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation are provided. Finally, we give some conclusions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. N-Soliton Solutions of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional AKNS Equation</title><p>We consider the following (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref21">21</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1321"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Through the dependent variable transformation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1322"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (2.1) is transformed into the following bilinear form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1323"><label>(2.3a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1324"><label>(2.3b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1325"><label>(2.3c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where D is the well-known Hirota bilinear operator defined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1326"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Expanding f, g and h as the series</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1327"><label>(2.4a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1328"><label>(2.4b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1329"><label>(2.4c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>substituting Equation (2.4) into (2.3) and comparing the coefficients of the same power of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1330"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1331"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1332"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1333"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1334"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1335"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1336"><label>(2.5a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1337"><label>(2.5b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we can obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1338"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1339"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Letting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus, the one-soliton solution is given as follows.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1340"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>In the same way, we can obtain the following N-soliton solutions of Equation (2.3).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1341"><label>(2.7a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1342"><label>(2.7b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1343"><label>(2.7c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1344"><label>(2.8a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1345"><label>(2.8b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1346"><label>(2.8c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1347"><label>(2.8d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> take over all possible combinations of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and satisfy the following condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1348"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Double Wronskian Solution and Generalized Double Wronskian Solution</title><p>Let us first specify some properties of the Wronskian determinant. As is well known, the double Wronskian determinant is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1349"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> The following two determinantal identities were often used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref5">5</xref>] . The one is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1350"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where D is a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> matrix and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and d represent N column vectors. The other is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1351"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are N column vectors and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Employing the Wronskian technique, we have the following result.</p><p>Theorem 1. The (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS Equation (2.3) has the double Wronskian solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1352"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the following conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1353"><label>(3.4a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1354"><label>(3.4b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. In the following, we use the abbreviated notation of Freeman and Nimmo for the Wronskian and its derivatives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref5">5</xref>] , then Equation (3.3) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1355"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x60.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>First, we calculate various derivatives of g and f with respect to x and t.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1356"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1357"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1358"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1359"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1360"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1361"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then a direct calculation gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1362"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Utilizing Equation (3.2) and Equation (3.4), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1363"><label>(3.7a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1364"><label>(3.7b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1365"><label>(3.7c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1366"><label>(3.7d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Noting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1367"><label>(3.8a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1368"><label>(3.8b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1369"><label>(3.8c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1370"><label>(3.8d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (3.7) and Equation (3.8), then Equation (3.6) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1371"><label>(3.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to (3.1), it is easy to see that Equation (3.9) is equal to zero. So, the proof of Equation (2.3a) is completed. Similarly Equations (2.3 b) and (2.3 c) can also be proved.</p><p>In the following, we give some exact solutions. From Equation (3.4), we deduce that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1372"><label>(3.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are arbitrary real constants.</p><p>Taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the double Wronskian solution of Equation (2.3) is obtained as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1373"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1374"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1375"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Letting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1376"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then one-soliton solution of Equation (2.1) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1377"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1378"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Choosing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1379"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1380"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1381"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1382"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1383"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1384"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1385"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1386"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1387"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the following, we will prove that Equation (2.3) has the generalized double Wronskian solution. First, we give the following lemma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61290-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Lemma 1. Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> operator matrix and its entries <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are differential operators. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is an <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> function matrix with column vector set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and row vector set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1388"><label>(3.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Using the Lemma 1 and the Wronskian technique, we construct the following result.</p><p>Theorem 2. The (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS Equation (2.3) has the generalized double Wronskian solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1389"><label>(3.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the following conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1390"><label>(3.13a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1391"><label>(3.13b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is an <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> arbitrary real matrix independent of x and t.</p><p>In fact, similar the proof of Theorem 1, we only need to verify that identities (3.7) hold.</p><p>(1) If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> setting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1392"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x122.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from Lemma 1, we can get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1393"><label>(3.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (3.13), the left-hand side of (3.14) is equal to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1394"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1395"><label>(3.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (3.15), we derive further</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1396"><label>(3.16a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1397"><label>(3.16b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1398"><label>(3.16c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1399"><label>(3.16d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1400"><label>(3.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is obvious that (3.7) hold.</p><p>(2) If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we can consider this as a limit case where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> tends to zero. Then (3.15)-(3.17) become</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1401"><label>(3.18a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1402"><label>(3.18b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1403"><label>(3.18c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1404"><label>(3.18d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1405"><label>(3.18e)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1406"><label>(3.18f)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (3.18), Equation (3.12) still satisfies Equation (2.3).</p><p>From Equation (3.13), we can get the general solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1407"><label>(3.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are real constant vectors. Thus, we have the fol</p><p>lowing result.</p><p>Theorem 3. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is an <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> arbitrary real matrix independent of x and t. Equation (2.3) has double Wronskian solution (3.12), where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x144.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are constructed by (3.19). The corresponding solution of Equation (2.1) can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1408"><label>(3.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x146.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Rational Solutions</title><p>In the section, we will give rational solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS Equation (2.1).</p><p>Expanding (3.19) leads to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1409"><label>(4.1a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x147.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1410"><label>(4.1b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x148.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1411"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we can obtain solution solutions of Equation (2.3), where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1412"><label>(4.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1413"><label>(4.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x151.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>it is obvious to know that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Thus (4.1) can be truncated as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1414"><label>(4.5a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x153.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1415"><label>(4.5b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x154.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The components of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1416"><label>(4.6a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1417"><label>(4.6b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x158.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1418"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x159.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In (4.6), taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then (4.6) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1419"><label>(4.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x162.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, we can calculate some rational solutions of Equation (2.1).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1420"><label>(4.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1421"><label>(4.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x164.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1422"><label>(4.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x165.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Matveev Solutions</title><p>In the following, we will discuss Matveev solutions of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation.</p><p>Let A be a Jordan matrix</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1423"><label>(5.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x166.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Without loss of generality, we observe the following Jordan block (dropping the subscript of k)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1424"><label>(5.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x167.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is an <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x168.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x169.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> unite matrix. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1425"><label>(5.3a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x170.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1426"><label>(5.3b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x171.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (5.2) into (4.1), we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1427"><label>(5.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x172.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The components of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1428"><label>(5.5a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x175.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1429"><label>(5.5b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Specially, taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then (5.5) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1430"><label>(5.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, Matveev solutions of Equation (2.1) can be obtained, where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1431"><label>(5.7a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1432"><label>(5.7b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1433"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In (5.7), taking</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1434"><label>(5.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x183.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are generated from (5.6), we can obtain the Matveev solution of Equation (2.1).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1435"><label>(5.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x186.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, choosing</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1436"><label>(5.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x187.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1437"><label>(5.11a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x189.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1438"><label>(5.11b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x190.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1439"><label>(5.11c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x191.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1440"><label>(5.12a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x193.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1441"><label>(5.12b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x194.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1442"><label>(5.12c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x195.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Assume that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1443"><label>(5.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x196.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>letting <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1444"><label>(5.14a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x198.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1445"><label>(5.14b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x199.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1446"><label>(5.14c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x200.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1447"><label>(5.15a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x202.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1448"><label>(5.15b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x203.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1449"><label>(5.15c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x204.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Complexitions of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional AKNS Equation</title><p>In the following, we would like to consider that A is a real Jordan matrix.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1450"><label>(6.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x205.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1451"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x206.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are real constants. Then, from (4.1), complexitons can be obtained.</p><p>In order to prove that, we first observe the simplest case when</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1452"><label>(6.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x209.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (6.2) into (4.1a) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1453"><label>(6.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x210.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Expanding the above φ and taking advantage of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1454"><label>(6.4a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x212.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1455"><label>(6.4b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x213.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further, we consider the matrix A as a Jordan block <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x214.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1456"><label>(6.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x215.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1457"><label>(6.5b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x216.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the symbol <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes tensor product of matrices. Noting that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1458"><label>(6.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x219.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Employing the following formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1459"><label>(6.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x220.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then (6.6) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1460"><label>(6.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x221.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (6.8) into (4.1) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1461"><label>(6.9a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x222.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1462"><label>(6.9b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x223.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or</p><p><img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x224.png" /> (6.10a)<img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x225.png" /> (6.10b)</p><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1463"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x226.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1464"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x227.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1465"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x228.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to (6.4), Equation (6.10) can be expressed as the following explicit form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1466"><label>(6.11a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x229.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1467"><label>(6.11b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x230.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, the double Wronskian (3.12) is the complextion of Equation (2.3), where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1468"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x231.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1469"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x232.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1470"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x233.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>On the other hand, for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the partial derivative with respect to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x234.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x235.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be replaced by the</p><p>partial derivative with respect to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x236.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (6.10) and (6.11).</p><p>For example, taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (dropping the subscript) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x237.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x240.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1471"><label>(6.12a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x241.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1472"><label>(6.12b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x242.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61290-formula1473"><label>(6.12c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-1720403x243.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we have obtained N-solution solutions and the generalized double Wronskian solution of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation through the Hirota method and the Wronskian technique, respectively. Moreover, we have given rational solutions, Matveev solutions and complexitons of the (2 + 1)-dimensional AKNS equation. According to our knowledge, the three solutions are novel.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to express his thanks to the Editor and the referee for their comments. This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (Grant No. ZR2014AM001), and the youth teacher development program of Shandong Province of China.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Yepeng Sun, (2015) New Exact Solutions of the (2 + 1)-Dimensional AKNS Equation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics,03,1391-1405. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2015.311167</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61290-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gardner, C.S., Greene, J.M., Kruskal, M.D. and Miura, R.M. (1967) Method for Solving the Korteweg de Vries Equation. Physical Review Letters, 19, 1095-1097. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.19.1095</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matveev, V.B. and Salle, M.A. (1991) Darboux Transformations and Solitons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00922-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirota, R. (1971) Exact Solution of the Korteweg-de Vries Equation for Multiple Collisions of Solitons. Physical Review Letters, 27, 1192-1194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.27.1192</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freeman, N.C. and Nimmo, J.J.C. (1983) Soliton Solutions of the KdV and KP Equations: The Wronskian Technique. Physics Letters A, 95, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(83)90764-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nimmo, J.J.C. and Freeman, N.C. (1983) A Method of Obtaining the N-Soliton Solution of the Boussinesq Equation in Terms of a Wronskian. Physics Letters A, 95, 4-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(83)90765-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, X.B. and Wang, H.Y. (2006) Construction of dKP and BKP Equations with Self-Consistent Sources. Inverse Problems, 22, 1903-1920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/22/5/022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, X.B. and Wang, H.Y. (2007) New Type of Kadomtsev-Petviashvili Equation with Self-Consistent Soureces and Its Blinear B&amp;#228;cklund Transformation. Inverse Problems, 23, 1433-1444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satsuma, J. (1979) A Wronskian Representation of N-Soliton Solutions of Nonlinear Evolution Equations. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 46, 359-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.46.359</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Matveev, V.B. (1992) Generalized Wronskian Formula for Solutions of the KdV Equation: First Applications. Physics Letters A, 166, 205-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)90362-P</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. (2002) Complexiton Solutions to the Korteweg-de Vries Equation. Physics Letters A, 301, 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00971-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. (2004) Wronskians, Generalized Wronskians and Solutions to the Korteweg-de Vries Equation. Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, 19, 163-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-0779(03)00087-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. and Maruno, K. (2004) Complexiton Solutions of the Toda Lattice Equation. Physica A, 343, 219-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.06.072</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. and You, Y. (2005) Solving the Korteweg-de Vries Equation by Its Bilinear Form: Wronskian Solutions. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 357, 1753-1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-04-03726-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. (2005) Complexiton Solutions to Integrable Equations. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications, 63, 2461-2471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.01.068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. (2005) Complexiton Solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries Equation with Self-Consistent Sources. Chaos, Solitons &amp; Fractals, 26, 1453-1458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.03.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X., Li, C.X. and He, J.S. (2009) A Second Wronskian Formulation of the Boussinesq Equation. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications, 70, 4245-4258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2008.09.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ablowitz, M.J., Kaup, D.J., Newell, A.C. and Segur, H. (1974) The Inverse Scattering Transform-Fourier Analysis for Nonlinear Problems. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 53, 249-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sapm1974534249</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Q.M. (1990) Double Wronskian Solution of the AKNS and Classical Boussinesq Hierarchies. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 59, 3520-3527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.59.3520</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y., Zhang, D.J. and Bo, J.B. (2008) New Double Wronskian Solutions of the AKNS Equation. Science in China Series A: Mathematics, 51, 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11425-007-0165-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lou, S.Y. and Hu, X.B. (1997) Infinitely Many Lax Pair and Symmetry Constraints of the KP Equation. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 38, 6407-6427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.532219</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61290-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lou, S.Y., Chen, C.L. and Tang, X.Y. (2002) (2 + 1)-Dimensional (M + N)-Component AKNS System: Painlevé Integrability, Infinitely Many Symmetries, Similarity Reductions and Exact Solutions. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 43, 4078-4109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1490407</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>