<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2015.310157</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-60687</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Gauge Transformation between Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy and a Related Lattice Hierarchy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>uqing</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chao</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Juan</surname><given-names>Dai</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Physics &amp;amp; Mathematics, Changzhou University, Changzhou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Information and Technique College of Changzhou, Changzhou, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yqmail321@163.com(UL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>10</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>1282</fpage><lpage>1294</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>25</month>	<year>October</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A new lattice hierarchy related to Ragnisco-Tu equation is proposed and its gauge equivalence to Ragnisco-Tu equation is proven. As an application of gauge transformation, we construct Darboux transformation (DT) of this new equation through DT of Ragnisco-Tu equation. An explicit exact solution is presented as an example.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy</kwd><kwd> Gauge Transformation</kwd><kwd> Transfer Operator</kwd><kwd> Darboux Transformation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Nonlinear integrable equations usually have some marvellous properties such as Hamilton structure and infinitely many conservation laws. There are close connections between many of these equations. For instance, the cerebrated KdV equation, modified KdV equation, and nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation are reduction of AKNS system. Boussinesq equation and derivative nonlinear Schr&#246;dinger equation are linked to the constraint of KP equation (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref1">1</xref>] ). Jaulent-Miodek equation, Kaup-Newell equation, Levi equation and Heisenberg equation were found to be equivalent to AKNS equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref6">6</xref>] . The relation between two equations plays an important role, which makes one tackle with relatively unfamiliar equations through relatively familiar equations. However, in a general survey, there is comparatively less research on relatedness of lattice soliton equations than that of continuous soliton equations. One of the reasons behind this actuality is the lack of related example. In this paper we put forward a pair of nonlinear integrable lattice equations and investigate some relations such as gauge equivalence relation and Darboux transformation between them. Utilizing the relation which has been found, we will obtain an exact solution of equation.</p><p>Ragnisco-Tu equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref8">8</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1879"><label>(1.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is an integrable lattice soliton equation. Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref8">8</xref>] discussed its Hamilton structure, and proved that its continuous limit may result in AKNS system. Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref9">9</xref>] obtained its inverse scattering transformation and exact solution. Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref10">10</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref12">12</xref>] researched more general problems, and studied Hamilton structure and Darboux transformation and geometric algerba solutions. Ragnisco-Tu equation has spectral problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref7">7</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1880"><label>(1.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, E means a shift of space variable n, subscript t denotes partial derivative with respect to time t, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is spectral parameter and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are potential functions. The derivation of equation hierarchy will be given in Section 2. This spectral problem can be generalized to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1881"><label>(1.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This method for constructing new lattice equation was first used in modified Toda equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref14">14</xref>] . Surprisingly, equations obtained via these two spectral equations are equivalent, but this feature does not appear on Toda equation. On this basis, we further discuss Darboux transformation of them. With the help of gauge transformation and Darboux transformation of Ragnisco-Tu equation, we get a Darboux transformation of new equation, which is complex and difficult to construct directly.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows: in Section 2 and Section 3, we deduce the general hierarchies of Ragnisco-Tu and related generalized lattice hierarchy respectively. In Section 4, we derive a gauge transformation and transfer operator of two hierarchies. Section 5 will contribute to the Darboux transformation of two equations. Finally, in Section 6, a conclusion is presented.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Derivation of Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy</title><p>The derivation of Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy can be referred to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref9">9</xref>] , but for completeness we still give a concise version.</p><p>Consider time evolution corresponding to (1.2)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1882"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>discrete zero curvature equation results in following equalities directly</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1883"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1884"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1885"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1886"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From these equations we draw out relations between related quantities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1887"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1888"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are constants independent of variable n. Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1889"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the relations (2.2)-(2.5) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1890"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1891"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1892"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Giving boundary condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1893"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we may deduce the iso-spectral hierarchy as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1894"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The case of k = 0 just gives Ragnisco-Tu Equation (1.1).</p><p>If the boundary condition is given as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1895"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get non-iso-spectral Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1896"><label>(2.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where I is an identity operator. In more general case, Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy is expressed by</p><p>Lemma 2.1. If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the polynomials of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with degree <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and the boundary condition is as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1897"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then general Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy adopts the from</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1898"><label>(2.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. A New Lattice Hierarchy Related to the Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy</title><p>With regard to generalized spectral problem (1.3), introduce the time evolution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1899"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then from discrete zero curvature equation, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1900"><label>(3.2a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1901"><label>(3.2b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x41.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1902"><label>(3.2c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1903"><label>(3.2d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is ease to know that there only have three independent equations, for instance, (3.2b), (3.2c), (3.2d). Now, from them we work out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1904"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1905"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are independent of n. Introducing two operators <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1906"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1907"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we get matrix form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1908"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1909"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the general lattice hierarchy (called generalized Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy) is deduced in</p><p>Lemma 3.1. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the polynomials of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with degree k and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, take<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then under boundary condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1910"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the generalized Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1911"><label>(3.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Especially when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it is the iso-spectral hierarchy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1912"><label>(3.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The first one (k = 0) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1913"><label>(3.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we take<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then we get the non-iso-spectral hierarchy as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1914"><label>(3.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The first one (k = 0) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1915"><label>(3.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Expanding (3.7) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1916"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equating the coefficients of power of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> leads to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1917"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1918"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1919"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Through mathematical induction we get the recursion relation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1920"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From it the conclusion of Lemma 3.1 is got.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. A Gauge Transformation and Transfer Operator between the Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy and Generalized Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy</title><p>In this section we will give the conclusion about gauge transformation and transfer operator between the Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy and generalized Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy.</p><p>Theorem 4.1. There exists a gauge transformation changing Lax pair of generalized Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy (1.3), (3.1) into Lax pair of Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1921"><label>(4.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further, potentials in (1.2) and those in (1.3) have the relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1922"><label>(4.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, hierarchy (2.15) and hierarchy (3.9) satisfy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1923"><label>(4.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is transfer operator defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1924"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. As gauge transformation, T should satisfy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1925"><label>(4.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1926"><label>(4.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the entries of it must meet the following equations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1927"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1928"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1929"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1930"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Notice that T is independent of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x85.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, its entries are determined easily.</p><p>Transformation matrix T also changes time evolution (3.1) into (2.1). To justify this assertion, for a newly defined <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we need to prove that equality <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is hold. A simple calculation shows us</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1931"><label>(4.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1932"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1933"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1934"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1935"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is evident that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the polynomial of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with degree<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>respectively, which are the same as that of elements of N. In the meantime, the condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is equiva-</p><p>lent to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and thus if permitting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is valid.</p><p>On the other hand, we can verify directly that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Combining all discussed above we conclude that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> That is, the gauge transformation (4.1) conveys time evolution of (3.1) into that of (2.1).</p><p>Now we deduce transfer operator of two hierarchies. A dull calculation simplifies the expression of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1936"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1937"><label>(4.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for iso-spectral and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for non-iso-spectral.</p><p>Because of in the case of iso-spectral and non-iso-spectral, the following recursion formula always holds</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1938"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>(In the case of iso-spectral,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1939"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1940"><label>(In the case of iso-spectral,), we can deduce transformation relation by substituting the above relations into (4.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x119.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1941"><label>(4.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the transfer operator of two hierarchies. Comparing the coefficients of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1942"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the derivation expressions of iso-spectral and non-iso-spectral equation we arrive at the relation of two hierarchies immediately</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1943"><label>(4.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When we focus our attention on the iso-spectral case, (4.7) holds for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. That is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1944"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which can be verified readily. When we concern about the non-iso-spectral case, (4.7) holds for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the verification is not so easy. To get the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1945"><label>(4.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we first prove</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1946"><label>(4.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Denote</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1947"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is ease to know “<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>”. As for “<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>” we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1948"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1949"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Their difference is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1950"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Equation (4.11) is proved.</p><p>On the other hand, through comparing the coefficients of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x138.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1951"><label>(4.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x139.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>That is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1952"><label>(4.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the recursion relations of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> together with (4.11), (4.12) and the formula of transformation operator (4.8) we finally obtain the recursion relation of non-iso-spectral (4.10).</p><p>Finally, we consider relevancy of two hierarchy. The time part of (4.3) has given in (4.9). The following equation is deduced according to (4.13) and (4.8)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1953"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (4.11) together with above expression yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1954"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Through mathematical induction we can prove the part of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (4.3). The proof of part of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is similar and it is much simpler. Thus we finish the theorem.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Darboux Transformation to Generalized Ragnisco-Tu Equation</title><p>Darboux transformation is a very useful tool to obtain exact solutions of nonlinear integral equation. It plays role in every type of equations such as lattice equation, discrete equation and high dimensional integral equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref15">15</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref22">22</xref>] . However, the construction of DT of complex system may still encounter difficulty. Here, we will have the aid of gauge transformation to consider DT of generalized Ragnisco-Tu equation.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Darboux Transformation to Ragnisco-Tu Equation</title><p>Consider transformation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1955"><label>(5.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x147.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are independent of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We can see that it is a DT of Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy:</p><p>Lemma 5.1. (see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60687-ref12">12</xref>] ) Suppose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then aforementioned transformation (5.1) is DT of Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy expressed by Lemma 2.1 with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. If<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x154.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x157.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are used to denote potentials of spectral problem (1.2) and that of spectral problem transformed through formula (5.1) respectively, then the relations between them are formulized as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1956"><label>(5.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x158.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x159.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are determined by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1957"><label>(5.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x160.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x161.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is solution of Riccati equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1958"><label>(5.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x163.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. Transformation T as DT must solve the following equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1959"><label>(5.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x164.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Comparing coefficients of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in entries of both side yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1960"><label>(5.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x166.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1961"><label>(5.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x167.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1962"><label>(5.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x168.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1963"><label>(5.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x169.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Suppose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are two zeros of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then components of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are linear dependent, which means<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x174.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be determined according to formulas (5.3).</p><p>Transformation (5.1) also change (2.1) to time evolution which matches to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x175.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. To justify this assertion, we first consider</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1964"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> means adjoint matrix of H. The expressions of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x177.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1965"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1966"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1967"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1968"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will prove that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are zeros of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and V<sub>11</sub>, V<sub>22</sub> and V<sub>12</sub>, V<sub>21</sub> are polynomials of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with degree k + 3 and k + 2 respectively. This assures entries of matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x183.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x185.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x186.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x187.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x188.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> have the same degrees as that of N. Assume asymptotic condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1969"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x189.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we will find that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has the same asymptotic behavior. Therefore, because of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> also satisfy the same different equation, we say<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., transformation (5.1) change (2.1) into time evolution matching to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x190.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x191.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x192.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x193.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x194.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x195.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Now we deal with V<sub>11</sub> as an example. First of all, referring to the fact that A<sub>n</sub>, D<sub>n</sub> and B<sub>n</sub>, C<sub>n</sub> are polynomials of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with degree k + 1 and k, it is ease to know V<sub>11</sub> is polynomial of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with degree k + 3. Secondly, according to the definition of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x196.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x197.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x198.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we work out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1970"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x199.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting them and (5.4) into V<sub>11</sub> gives rise to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1971"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x200.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is not difficult to check that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Noticing that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we may say that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x201.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x202.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x203.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1972"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x204.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is k + 1 power polynomial of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. As for asymptotic behavior of V<sub>11</sub>, obviously, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>make <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x205.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x206.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x207.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> hold. In the mean time, h<sub>1</sub>, h<sub>4</sub> tend to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. These results assure<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x208.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x209.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x210.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x211.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. When it comes</p><p>to V<sub>12</sub>, V<sub>21</sub>, V<sub>22</sub>, the proof is similar, we do not repeat it. Now we finish the proof that (5.1) is a Darboux transformation of Ragnisco-Tu hierarchy.</p><p>As an application we present a exact solution to Ragnisco-Tu Equation (1.1). Starting from seed solution<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x212.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we first obtain a solution to Riccati Equations (5.4)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1973"><label>(5.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x213.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then according to Lemma 5.1, a solution to Ragnisco-Tu can be calculated out as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1974"><label>(5.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x214.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Darboux Transformation to Generalized Ragnisco-Tu Equation</title><p>From gauge transformation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and DT of Ragnisco-Tu equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we find relation between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x215.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x216.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x217.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x218.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1975"><label>(5.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x219.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which forms DT of generalized Ragnisco-Tu equation. Matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x220.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> admits the following form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1976"><label>(5.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x221.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We can adopt simple notation to write it</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1977"><label>(5.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x222.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1978"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x223.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1979"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x224.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1980"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x225.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As a DT of generalized Ragnisco-Tu equation, P should satisfy</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1981"><label>(5.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x226.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1982"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x227.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From this expression, we can draw the following equalities</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1983"><label>(5.16a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x228.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1984"><label>(5.16b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x229.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1985"><label>(5.16c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x230.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1986"><label>(5.17a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x231.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1987"><label>(5.17b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x232.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1988"><label>(5.17c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x233.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1989"><label>(5.18a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x234.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1990"><label>(5.18b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x235.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1991"><label>(5.19a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x236.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1992"><label>(5.19b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x237.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The acquisition of solution of them must be combined with relation exhibited in Darboux matrix (5.13). Here we do not consider general formula of solution but present a special solution related to<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x238.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Notice that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the definitions of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x239.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x240.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (5.3), we can find some simple relations easily</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1993"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x241.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When seed solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x242.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is substituted into (5.16a)-(5.19b) we find following relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1994"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x243.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>These equalities produce</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1995"><label>(5.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x244.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1996"><label>(5.21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x245.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus we get</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1997"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x246.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and form (5.17c), we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1998"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x247.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting it into (5.21), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x248.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is figured out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.60687-formula1999"><label>(5.22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1720367x249.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>We propose a lattice equation hierarchy related to Rangnisco-Tu hierarchy (generalized RT equation) and prove that it is equivalent to Rangnisco-Tu hierarchy itself. The transfer operator of two hierarchies is obtained. As an application of gauge transformation, we obtain a Darboux transformation of generalized RT equation and acquire an exact solution of this equation.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors feel grateful to pertinent opinions of reviewer and careful work of editors.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>YuqingLiu,ChaoHu,JuanDai, (2015) A Gauge Transformation between Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy and a Related Lattice Hierarchy. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics,03,1282-1294. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2015.310157</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.60687-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y. (2006) Introduction of Soliton. Science Press, Beijing. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y. and Zeng, Y.B. (1985) The Trans-formation Operator of Nonlinear Evolution Equations I. Chinese Annals of Mathematics, 6B, 71-82.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y. and Zeng, Y.B. (1985) The Transformation Operator of Nonlinear Evolution Equations III. Acta Mathematica, 28, 161-173. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y. and Li, Y.S. (1986) The Transformation Operator of Nonlinear Evolution Equations IV. Acta Mathematica, 29, 127-134. (In Chinese)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y. and Li, Y.S. (1986) The Transformation Operator of Nonlinear Evolution Equations V. Acta Mathematica Sinica, New Series, 2, 343-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02564935</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chau, L.L., Shaw, J.C. and Yen, H.C. (1992) Solving the KP Hierarchy by Gauge Transformations. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 149, 263-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02097625</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, H.W., Tu, G.Z., et al. (1991) Symmetries, Conserved Quantities, and Hier-archies for Some Lattice Systems with Soliton Structure. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 32, 1908-1918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.529205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, Y.B. (1998) Restried Flows of a Hierarchy of Integrable Discrete Systems. Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, 14, 176-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02677424</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Y.Q. and Chen, D.Y. (2011) The Exact Solutions to a Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy with Self-Consistent Sources. Nonlinear Analysis, 74, 5223-5237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2011.04.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, X.X. (2010) An Integrable Coupling Family of Merola-Ragnisco-Tu Lattice Systems, Its Hamiltonian Structure and Related Nonisospectral Integrable Lattice Family. Physics Letters A, 374, 401-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.11.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, X. and Geng, X.G. (2014) Algebro-Geometric Solutions of the Discrete Ragnisco-Tu Hierarchy. Reports on Mathematical Physics, 73, 17-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4877(14)60030-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, X.X. (2015) Solving an Integrable Coupling System of Mer-ola-Ragnisco-Tu Lattice Equation by Darboux Transformation of Lax Pair. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 23, 192-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, X.X., Yang, H.X. and Sun, Y.P. (2006) Dar-boux Transformation of the Modified Toda Lattice Equation. Modern Physics Letters B, 20, 641-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217984906011025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hon, Y.C. and Fan, E.G. (2009) Quasi-Periodic Solutions for Modified Toda Lattice Equation. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 40, 1297-1308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.09.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spiridonov, V. and Zhedanov, A. (1995) Discrete Darboux Transformations, the Discrete-Time Toda Lattice, and the Askey-Wilson Polynomials. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 2, 369-398.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fan, E.G. (2001) Explicit N-Fold Darboux Transformations and Soliton Solutions for Nonlinear Derivative Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equations. Com-munications in Theoretical Physics, 35, 651-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/35/6/651</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeng, Y.B., Shao, Y.J. and Ma, W.X. (2002) Integral-Type Darboux Transformations for the mKdV Hierarchy with Self-Consistent Sources. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 38, 641-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/38/6/641</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, J.S., Zhang, L., Chen, Y. and Li, Y.S. (2006) Determinant Representation of Darboux Transformation for the AKNS System. Science in China Series A: Mathematics, 49, 1867-1878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11425-006-2025-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, Z.X. (2007) Darboux Transformations for Some Two Dimensional Affine Toda Equations. The International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians (ICCM), III, 405-416.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, L., Gao, Y.T., Gai, X.L., Yu, X. and Sun, Z.Y. (2010) Vadermonde-Type Odd-Soliton Solutions for the Whitham-Broer-Kaup Model in the Shallow Water Small-Amplitude Regime. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 17, 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1402925110000714</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geng, X.G. and He, G.L. (2010) Darboux Transformation and Explicit Solutions for the Satsuma-Hirota Coupled Equation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 216, 2628-2634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.03.107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60687-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xu, G.H. (2014) N-Fold Darboux Transformation of the Jaulent-Miodek Equation. Applied Mathematics, 5, 2657-2663. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.517254</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>