<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2015.715100</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-60480</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Study of the Inhibitor Scaling Effect of the Agricultural Water by a Phosphate Fertilizer
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>bdallah</surname><given-names>Hadfi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Said</surname><given-names>Ben-Aazza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M’barek</surname><given-names>Belaatar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Naima</surname><given-names>Hafid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Driouiche</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Team “Materials and Physical Chemistry of Water”, Faculty of Science, University Ibn Zohr, Agadir, Morocco</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hadfiabd@yahoo.fr(BH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>15</issue><fpage>1234</fpage><lpage>1241</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>19</month>	<year>October</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The localised irrigation or drop by drop system is a technique which makes it possible to save water, because it ensures a balanced and efficient distribution of water and an effective fertilization. However, this ferti-irrigation system is facing a number of problems hindering the agricultural development. The lack of uniformity of the localised irrigation was observed and found out that it is due to chemical clogging of drippers. Considering the complexity of the composition of the natural water used in micro-irrigation, we started our study by examining the effectiveness of the inhibitor on pure calco-carbonic water with 40&#176;F, and then moved to explore the natural water of the agricultural region. The Legrand-Poirier-Leroy method allowed us to determine the position of the irrigation water compared to calco-carbonic balance. LCGE (abbreviation of “Laboratory of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering”) technique, based on the accelerated formation of calcium carbonate deposit under the effect of a degasification of studied water, enabled us to evaluate the scaling power of this water of irrigation either with or without inhibitor. The experimental results showed the following: in the case of pure calco-carbonic water with 40?F and of natural water, the addition respectively of 2 mg/L and 2.25 mg/L of phosphate fertilizer completely inhibits the precipitation of calcium carbonate under the conditions of the experiment.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Scaling Power</kwd><kwd> Water</kwd><kwd> Irrigation</kwd><kwd> Calcium Carbonate</kwd><kwd> Inhibitor</kwd><kwd> Phosphate Fertilizer</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In order to both avoid useless expenses and save environment, watering drip-drip system, also known as micro- irrigation, ensures just distribution of the right quantity of water required for each plant. This system is not only inexpensive but also able to save water and guarantee good fertilization. However, this system of localized fertigation faces problems that constrain agricultural development. The lack of uniformity of drip irrigation has been observed and it is due to the chemical clogging of drippers which is leading to a decline in agricultural production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>To prevent the precipitation of calcium carbonate met at the level of drip irrigation systems, we have limited ourselves in this study to looking into preventive chemical processes. This procedure followed is continuously injecting chemical inhibitors in small quantities in the pipeline of the irrigation water.</p><p>For agricultural application, it’s necessary to use scale inhibitors easily assimilated by plants. That’s why we chose a product that can play both the scale inhibitor and the role of fertilizer. In our present study, we are particularly interested in studying the effect of phosphate fertilizer. This product available in the local market is currently used as fertilizer. It is available in white solid form. It is used after dissolution in water.</p><p>Given the complexity of the composition of natural waters used in micro-irrigation, we studied the effectiveness of the inhibitor phosphate, first of all, in the pure calcocarbonic water at 40˚F (TCa similar to that of irrigation water, 1˚F (French degrees) corresponds to 10 mg/L of dissolved calcium carbonate or 4 mg/L of Ca<sup>2+</sup>), and then in the natural water for irrigation. The study was carried out in the temperature of 25˚C. It’s always proceeded by increasing amounts; the amount of designated tartrifuge for each test was introduced before the start of the manipulation. In all cases, the presence of tartrifuge does not modify the values of the TAC and TCa measured before the start of the experiment. The scale inhibitor of this inhibitory effect is evaluated by the technical LCGE. This method, proposed by Roques et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref5">5</xref>] , aims at provoking the precipitation of the calcium carbonate by a degassing (displacement of the calco-carbonic balance in the sense of the formation of the calcium carbonate) of the studied water. The statement of the pH values and the concentration of Ca<sup>2+</sup> ion in the course of time, consequently, allow making a description of the kinetics of precipitation. The experimental installation is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Inhibition of Scaling by a Phosphate Fertilizer</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Application for Pure Water at 40˚F</title><p>The phosphate fertilizer is a prevalent complex soluble fertilizer in water. It contains 11% nitrogen in the ammonium form and 55% phosphorus pentoxide (P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>). It is a product prepared by the Moroccan Company of Fertilizers and it is widely available in the local market.</p><p>The results obtained from the experimental data of the tests on pure calco-carbonic water at 40˚F, adding gradually increasingly quantities of MAP, carried out at 25˚C, are shown in Figures 2-4. The analysis of these curves and kinetic modeling result in the values shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The analysis of these results made it possible to come up with the following findings:</p><p>・ The time of germination increases with the concentration of scale preventive. From the concentrations higher or equal to 2 mg/L (effective concentration) the inhibition becomes total and the precipitation is not observed during the test.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Experimental set-up of the LCGE method. 1. Stripping gas; 2. Thermostat baths; 3. Immersion circulator-heating; 4. Humidifier; 5. Humidity traps; 6. Work cell; 7. Simple taken for dosage of [Ca<sup>2+</sup>]; 8. Temperature probe; 9. pH meter</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of pH according to the time of the tests with scale preventer phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of TAC according to the time of the tests with scale preventer phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x8.png"/></fig><p>・ The pH at the point of germination of the treated water increases with the concentration of the inhibitor, it increases from 8.56 per 0 mg/L to 8.82 per 1.5 mg/L. The fall in pH is clearly evident in the test without the inhibitor, whereas when the concentrations are increasing, this fall becomes less remarkable.</p><p>・ The degree of supersaturation at the time of germination undergoes an increase after the introduction of the scale preventive. It then ranges from 120.39 to test at 0 mg/L to 224.03 at 1.5 mg/L of scale preventive.</p><p>・ The precipitation follows a diffusion model concerning the test without inhibitor. It is modelled by the model of Reddy for tests with the inhibitor.</p><p>The scale preventive effect of the ions orthophosphates, in particular ion<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is due to its surface adsorption on the crystals of calcite according to Reddy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref6">6</xref>] and Berner [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref7">7</xref>] . Simkiss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref8">8</xref>] clarified that the ion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may locally substitute <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the crystal architecture of calcite. This substitution disrupts the electrostatic field due to the difference between the two valence ions thus preventing the formation of a new layer <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> ion and therefore blocks the crystal growth. Stumm et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref9">9</xref>] have reported the possibility of their side, in a pH which ranges from 6.8 to 8.3, the epitaxial growth of apatite calcite which is also in the sense of the possibility of substitution by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> ions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at the level of implantation surface of the calcite crystal again confirms the dimensional compatibility of the two ions species.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of the rate of supersaturation βcal according to the time of the tests with scale preventer phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x15.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Germination time (Tg), pH of germination (pH<sub>g</sub>), supersaturation coefficient overlooked to the calcite (bcalcite) and precipitation speed of calco-carbonic solution at 40˚F added increasing quantities of phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concentration in mg/L</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tg (mn)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >pH<sub>g</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >bcal</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diffusional calcite</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reddy calcite</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>D</sub> (mn<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>R</sub> (˚F<sup>−1</sup>∙mn<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.989</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >209.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.877</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.924</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >224.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.823</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.847</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>In the case of phosphate fertilizer used here, the phosphate grouping is introduced in the form of monohydrogen phosphate. The small introduced quantities have no significant effect on the pH of the solution. However, the degassing causes alkalinization of the medium, which stabilizes the anion <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which can substitute <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60480-ref8">8</xref>] . The electrostatic field is obviously locally disturbed (the phosphate ion carries three loads (-) instead of two for the ion carbonates). The stacking of successive layers of calcite is disturbed and the growth of the germs is thereby stopped.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Application to Agricultural Waters</title><p>The Legrand-Poirier-Leroy method is a calculation method based on the thermodynamic equilibrium involving all calco-carbonic species and incorporating the effect of the ionic strength due to other major species. This method has the advantage to be applicable to most types of fresh water and to forecast the characteristics of a water following various treatments of equilibration.</p><p>This method allowed us to determine the position of the irrigation waters compared to calco-carbonic equilibrium. Thus, we determined, by means of the software Legrand-Poirier-Leroy (LPLWin), the supersaturation coefficient and the potential quantity of calcium carbonate that should precipitated a liter of water to reach equilibrium.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> illustrates the physicochemical characteristics and the results of the thermodynamic predictions obtained using the Legrand-Poirier-Leroy method the water. The ionic balance is 0.32%, which is satisfactory. The coefficient of supersaturation is 2.53, which proves that the type of this water is calcifying and the quantity of calcium carbonate which it must deposit to reach equilibrium is 36.13 mg/L.</p><p>The representation of Legrand-Poirier-Leroy applied to water leads to the curves represented on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. It is</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Physicochemical characteristics and results of the thermodynamic predictions of the irrigation water</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >In me/L</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Equilibria</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cst. Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Marbre</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Equilibrium</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atmosphere</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ΣCation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.406</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >me/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >μS/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1264</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ΣAnion</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.449</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >me/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ΔpH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ΔpH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Balance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >∆CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−36.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >∆CaCO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−19.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tot. Hardn.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.626</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.869</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tot. Alk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tot. Alk</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >˚F</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Alk.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400.973</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.825</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.714</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Free CO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.487</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >401.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >357.767</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >351.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.106</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T.I.C.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mm/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >λ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.747</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T.I.C.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.777</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.691</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mm/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T.I.C.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mm/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sodium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.749</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SatuRatio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >∆T.I.C.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.725</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.362</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mm/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >∆T.I.C.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mm/L</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Potassium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.031</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcifying</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Saturatio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chloride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.632</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >satuCO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >satuCO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcifying</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulphate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.409</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.765</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Representation of calco-carbonic balance according to Legrand-Poirier-Leroy of the irrigation water</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x27.png"/></fig><p>noted that the position of the figurative point M is located in the zone of calcifying water.</p><p>Following this study, we were interested in the effect of the phosphate fertilizer on the water of agriculture. This study was carried out by means of the LCGE at a temperature of 25˚C. Figures 6-8 represent curves LCGE of the natural water after adding increasingly quantities of phosphate fertilizer.</p><p>The analysis of these curves and kinetic modeling leads to the values presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>Indeed, we notice that in the presence of the chemical inhibitor, the curves of precipitation of calcium carbonate undergo modifications:</p><p>・ The time of germination is in clear increase compared to the control test. Scaling is completely inhibited for a concentration 2.25 mg/L, under the conditions of the experiment.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Curves pH according to the time of the tests with natural water added with the increasing concentrations in phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x28.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> TAC curves according to the time of the tests with natural water added with the increasing concentrations in phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x29.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of the coefficient of supersaturation according to the time of the tests with natural water added with the increasing concentrations in phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-9402655x30.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Germination time (Tg), pH of germination (pH<sub>g</sub>), coefficient of supersaturation overlooked to the calcite (bcalcite) and precipitation speed of the natural water added with the increasing quantities of phosphate fertilizer</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concentration mg/L</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Tg (mn)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >pH<sub>g</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >bcal</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Diffusional calcite</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Reddy calcite</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>D</sub> (mn<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>R</sub> (˚F<sup>−1</sup>∙mn<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.74 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.89 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.56 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.998</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >189.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.03 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.994</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >344.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.91 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.956</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.970</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >386.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11 &#215; 10<sup>−3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39 &#215; 10<sup>−5</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.981</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>・ The speed of scaling decreases according to the content of the inhibitor introduced into the solution.</p><p>・ The pH at the point of germination of the treated water increases with the concentrations of the inhibitor, it moves from 8.27 per 0 mg/L to 8.99 per 2 mg/L. The fall of the pH appears clearly in the test without inhibitor, whereas when the concentrations are increased, the fall becomes less remarkable.</p><p>・ The rate of supersaturation at the time of germination undergoes an increase after the introduction of the scale preventive. Then it varies from 73.62 for the test with 0 mg/L to 386.36 per 2 mg/L of scale preventive.</p><p>・ The precipitation follows a diffusional model in the test without inhibitor. It is modeled by the Reddy model for tests with the inhibitor.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>The Legrand-Poirier-Leroy method allowed us to determine the position of the irrigation waters compared to calco-carbonic equilibrium. The LCGE technique, based on the accelerated formation of deposits of calcium carbonate under the effect of degassing of the studied water, allowed us to evaluate the power scaling of these irrigation waters.</p><p>Indeed, the application of this technique on the pure calco-carbonic water (40˚F), allowed us to essentially bring out the inhibiting character of scaling of the phosphate fertilizer used by farmers.</p><p>The experimental results allowed us to conclude that germination time in the case of the calco-carbonic solution at 40˚F is 12 minutes without inhibitor; the addition of 2 mg/L of phosphate fertilizer to the latter makes it possible to avoid the precipitation of calcium carbonate under the conditions of the experiment, which is the total inhibition of scaling. The study carried out on the water of agriculture showed that 2.25 mg/L of the phosphate fertilizer completely inhibits the precipitation of calcium carbonate under the conditions of the experiment.</p><p>Thus, the inhibiting effect of scaling on agricultural water of this synthetic fertilizer is highlighted. It allows the stabilization of the encrusting water, whose thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics induce effectively the precipitation of calcium carbonate.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>AbdallahHadfi,SaidBen-Aazza,M’barekBelaatar,NaimaHafid,AliDriouiche, (2015) Study of the Inhibitor Scaling Effect of the Agricultural Water by a Phosphate Fertilizer. Journal of Water Resource and Protection,07,1234-1241. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2015.715100</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.60480-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadfi, A., Eddaoudi, H., El Hadek, M., Ghorbel, A. and Driouiche, A. (2011) The Characterization of Scaling Power of Irrigation Water of the Agricultural Region in Large Agadir. Physical and Chemical News, 57, 44-50.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roques, H. (1964) Static and Kinetic Study of the Systems Gas Carbonic-Water-Carbonate of Calcium. Thesis, Toulouse.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dedieu, L., Hort, C., Martin Dominguez, A., Rola, M. and Roques, H. (1994) Contribution to the Study of Scale Formation. I: Generality and Methods of Study. Tribune de l’eau, 47, 3-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hort, C., Martin Dominguez, A., Rabut, C. and Roques, H. (1995) Contribution to the Study of Scaling Phenomena. 2nd Part: The Kinetics of Crystal Growth. Tribune de l’eau, 48, 31-46.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elfil, H. and Roques, H. (2001) Role of Hydrate Phases of Calcium Carbonate on the Scaling Phenomenon. Desalination, 137, 177-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00216-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reddy, M.M. (1977) Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate in the Presence of Trace Concentrations of Phosphorus-Containing Anions: I. Inhibition by Phosphate and Glycerophosphate Ions at pH 8.8 and 25&amp;#176;C. Journal of Crystal Growth, 41, 287-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(77)90057-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berner, A. (1980) Crystallisation and Dissolution Kinetics of CaCO3 in Seawater. Acts of Congress “Crystallisation-Deformation-Dissolution” of Carbonates, Bordeaux, 17-18 November 1980, 33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Simkiss, K. (1964) Phosphates as Crystal Poisons of Calcification. Biological Reviews, 39, 487-504.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1964.tb01166.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60480-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stumm, W. and Leckie, J.O. (1970) Phosphate Exchange with the Sediments; Its Role in the Productivity of Surface Waters. Proceedings of 5th International Water Pollution Research Conference, San Francisco, 1970, 3-26.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>