<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJOR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Operations Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-8830</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajor.2015.55036</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJOR-59840</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Inventory Model for Perishable Items with Time Varying Stock Dependent Demand and Trade Credit under Inflation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ushil</surname><given-names>Kumar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>U.</surname><given-names>S. Rajput</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics &amp;amp; Astronomy, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>sushilmath4444@gmail.com(UK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>435</fpage><lpage>449</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>21</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>20</month>	<year>September</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In the classical inventory models, it is assumed that the retailer pays to the supplier as soon as he received the items and in such cases the supplier offers a cash discount or credit period (permis-sible delay) to the retailer. In this paper we presented an inventory model for perishable items with time varying stock dependent demand under inflation. It is assumed that the supplier offers a credit period to the retailer and the length of credit period is dependent on the order quantity. The purpose of our study is to minimize the present value of retailer’s total cost. Numerical examples are also given to demonstrate the presented mode.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Inventory</kwd><kwd> Deterioration</kwd><kwd> Perishable</kwd><kwd> Credit Period</kwd><kwd> Time Varying Stock Dependent Demand</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>In the classical inventory models payment for the items paid by the supplier depends on the payment paid by the retailer and in such cases the supplier offers a fixed credit period to the retailer during which no interest will be charged by the supplier so there is no need to pay the purchasing cost by the retailer and after this credit period up to the end of a period interest charged and paid by the retailer. In such situations the retailer starts to accumulate revenue on his sale and earn interest on his revenue. If the revenue earned by the retailer up to the end of credit period is enough to pay the purchasing cost or there is a budget then the balance is settled and the supplier does not charge any interest, otherwise the supplier charges interest for unpaid balance after the credit period. The interest and the remaining payment are made at the end of replenishment cycle.</p><p>In traditional EOQ models the payment time does not affect the profit and replenishment policy. If we consider the inflation then order quantity and payment time can influence both the supplier’s and retailer’s decisions. A large pile of perishable foods such as fruits, vegetables, milk, bread, chocklet etc. attract the consumers to buy more. Buzacott [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref1">1</xref>] considered an EOQ model with different type of pricing policies under inflation. Silver and Peterson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref2">2</xref>] developed an inventory model and show that the consumption rate is proportional to the displayed stock level. Baker and Urban [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref3">3</xref>] proposed an inventory model for deteriorating items with the demand rate is a polynomial function of instantaneous stock level. Mandal and Phaujdar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref4">4</xref>] presented an inventory model for deteriorating items with stock level dependent consumption rate. Vrat and Padmanabhan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref5">5</xref>] considered an inventory model with stock dependent demand under constant inflation rate. Padmanabhan and Vrat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref6">6</xref>] developed an EOQ model for perishable products under stock dependent selling rate. Bose et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref7">7</xref>] considered an inventory model for deteriorating items with time dependent demand and shortages under inflation and time discounting. Mandal and Maiti [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref8">8</xref>] developed an inventory model for damageable items with stock dependent demand and variable replenishment rate. Chung and Lin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref9">9</xref>] determine an optimal replenishment policy for an inventory model of deteriorating items by considering inflation and credit period. Chang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref10">10</xref>] proposed an EOQ model for deteriorating items under inflation and time discounting assuming that the supplier offers a trade credit policy if the retailer order size is larger than a certain level. Dye and Ouyang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref11">11</xref>] developed an EOQ model for perishable items with stock dependent selling rate by allowing shortages. Hou [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref12">12</xref>] presented an inventory model for deteriorating items with stock dependent consumption rate and shortages under inflation and credit period. Jaggi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref13">13</xref>] determine an optimal ordering policy for deteriorating items under inflation induced demand. Sana and Chaudhuri [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref14">14</xref>] developed a deterministic EOQ model with stock dependent demand and delay in payments. Valliaththal and Uthayakumar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref15">15</xref>] presented an inventory model for perishable items under stock and time dependent selling rate with shortages. Roy et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref16">16</xref>] considered an inventory model for deteriorating items with stock dependent demand under fuzzy inflation and time discounting over a random planning horizon. Sana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref17">17</xref>] proposed a lot size inventory model with stock dependent demand and time varying deterioration and partial backlogging. Chang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref18">18</xref>] determine an optimal replenishment policy for an inventory model of non-instantaneous deteriorating items with stock dependent demand. Sarkar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref19">19</xref>] presented an EMQ (economic manufacturing quantity) model of an imperfect production process with time dependent demand and time value of money under inflation. Yan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref20">20</xref>] considered an EOQ model for perishable items with freshness dependent demand and partial backlogging. Nagrare and Dutta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref21">21</xref>] developed a continuous review inventory model for perishable products with inventory dependent demand. Sana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref22">22</xref>] proposed a control policy for a production system inflation assuming a stock dependent demand and sales team promotional effort.Shuai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59840-ref23">23</xref>] considered an inventory model for perishable products with stock dependent demand and trade credit under inflation.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> show the variation of the parameters r and M when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> show the variation of parameters r and M when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> are correspond to the developed model. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> show the variation of retailer’s total cost with respect to the parameters r and M when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> show the variation of retailer’s total cost with respect to the parameters r and M when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>In the present paper we presented an inventory model for perishable items with time varying stock dependent demand and trade credit under inflation. Although there are so many research papers related to the perishable</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Corresponding to developed model</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> With n cycles in the developed model</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x11.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of retailer’s total cost with respect to the change of parameter r</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.70349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07928</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.43731</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78705</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30941</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of retailer’s total cost with respect to the change of parameter M</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.809153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71242</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66987</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.64061</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6158</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5929</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of retailer’s total cost with respect to the change of parameter r</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.494393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.495351</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.483842</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.437937</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.399872</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of retailer’s total cost with respect to the change of parameter M</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.494393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54603</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07174</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.59744</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.12314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Variation in TC with respect to r</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x51.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Variation in TC with respect to M</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x52.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Variation in TC with respect to r</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x53.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Variation in TC with respect to M</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x54.png"/></fig><p>products with stock dependent demand under inflation. This paper deals with the same type problem and it provides an approximate solution procedure of this problem for minimizing the present value of retailer’s total cost.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Assumptions and Notations</title><p>We consider the following assumptions and notations corresponding to the developed model</p><p>1) The demand rate <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>2) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the constant deterioration rate.</p><p>3) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the ordering cost per order.</p><p>4) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the holding cost per unit.</p><p>5) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the shortage cost.</p><p>6) M is the credit period.</p><p>7) T is the replenish cycle length.</p><p>8) r is the inflation rate.</p><p>9) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the interest charged per $ per unit time when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>10) C is the purchasing cost per unit.</p><p>11) P is the selling price per unit with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>12) Q is the initial inventory level.</p><p>13) L is the planning horizon.</p><p>14) The supplier sells one single item to the retailer.</p><p>15) The items are replenished when the stock level becomes zero.</p><p>16) The supplier provides a credit period, which is dependent on the order quantity.</p><p>17) The lead time is zero.</p><p>18) Shortages are not allowed.</p><p>19) The inventory planning horizon is finite and the numbers of cycles are finite in the planning horizon.</p><p>20) I(t) is the inventory level at any time t.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Mathematical Formulation</title><p>Suppose an inventory system consists the maximum inventory level at any time t = 0 and due to both demand and deterioration the inventory level decreases in the interval<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The replenishment cycle starts with the initial maximum inventory level Q and ends with zero stock level. The retailer’s instantaneous inventory level at any time t in the interval <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is governed by the following differential equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula297"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With the boundary condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula298"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The equation (1) can also be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula299"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>With the boundary condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula300"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For a 2<sup>nd</sup> order approximation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the solution of Equation (2) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula301"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the boundary condition, I(0) = Q the initial order quantity is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula302"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now we discuss the following two cases</p><p>(1) <img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x75.png" />and (2) <img data-original="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x76.png" /></p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Case I</title><p>When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then in this case the retailer can sell all the items before the end of credit period M because the credit period M is greater than the replenishment cycle length so no interest will be charged by the retailer. Since the purchasing cost is paid at the end of credit period M.</p><p>During the 1st cycle the present value of ordering cost is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula303"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>During the 1st cycle the present value of purchasing cost is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula304"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula305"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>During the 1st cycle the present value of holding cost is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula306"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula307"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore during the 1st cycle the present value of retailer’s total cost is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula308"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula309"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since there are m cycles in the planning horizon L then the present value of retailer’s total cost over the planning horizon L is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula310"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula311"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula312"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The necessary condition for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be minimum is that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the sufficient condition is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at the optimum value of T.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula313"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula314"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Case II</title><p>When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then there are three possibilities</p><p>1) Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then at M the revenue earned by the retailer is more than the purchasing cost</p><p>so in this case no interest will be charged by the supplier although the credit period M is smaller than the replenishment cycle length T so the present value of retailer’s total will be same as that in case I.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula315"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>2) Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then at M the revenue earned by the retailer is less than the purchasing cost</p><p>and the retailer has a budget to pay the remaining short purchasing cost so in this case there is still no interest charged by the supplier although the credit period M is smaller than the replenishment cycle length T so the present value of retailer’s total will be same as that in case I.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula316"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>3) Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then at M the revenue earned by the retailer is less than the purchasing cost</p><p>and the retailer has no budget to pay the remaining short purchasing cost so in this case for unpaid balance the interest will be charged by the supplier from M to T. The interest and the remaining payments are made at the end of replenishment cycle. So in this case the retailer’s total cost containing the ordering cost, holding cost, purchasing cost paid at M, the interest and the remaining payments are made at the end of replenishment cycle.</p><p>The present values of retailer’s ordering and holding are same cost as in case I</p><p>During the first cycle the purchasing cost paid at M is equal to the amount of revenue earned by the retailer up to M so</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula317"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula318"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>During the first cycle the present values of remaining payments and interest paid at the end of replenishment cycle are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula319"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula320"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>During the 1st cycle the present value of retailer’s total cost is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula321"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since there are m cycles in the planning horizon L then the present value of retailer’s total cost over the planning horizon L is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula322"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula323"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula324"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x106.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The necessary condition for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to be minimum is that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the sufficient condition is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at the optimum value of T.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula325"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula326"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Parameters</title><p>Let us consider the following parameters in the appropriate units</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula327"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Numerical Example I</title><p>When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then solving the equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we find the optimum value of T satisfying the condition<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>As we increase the parameter r then the value of total cost decreases.</p><p>As we increase the parameter M then the value of total cost decreases.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.3. Numerical Parameters</title><p>Let us consider the following parameters in the appropriate units</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59840-formula328"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.4. Numerical Example II</title><p>When <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then solving the equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we find the optimum value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying the condition<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> so the total cost is maximum.</p><p>As we increase the parameter r then the value of total cost increases.</p><p>As we increase the parameter M then the value of total cost decreases.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we proposed an inventory model for perishable items with time varying stock dependent demand under inflation and time discounting. In the numerical analysis we study the effect of the change of the parameters r and M on the optimal solution. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> we observe that as we increase the parameters r and M then the replenishment cycle length increases and the corresponding total cost decreases since the total cost decreases and the revenue increases on his sell to pay the purchasing cost and in the case when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/11-1040408x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> no interest will be charged by the supplier from the retailer. When the inflation rate increases then the retailer wants to short the length of replenishment cycle. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> we see that as we increase the parameter r then the value of replenishment cycle length and total cost decreases. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> we see that as we increase the parameter M then the value of replenishment cycle length increases and the value of total cost decreases. Thus we see that when the credit period is short then the retailer wants to order less and decrease the chargeable interest. When the credit period is large enough then the retailer wants to order more and he earns enough revenue on his sell to pay the purchasing cost therefore the credit period attracts the retailer to buy more or less.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>SushilKumar,U. S.Rajput, (2015) An Inventory Model for Perishable Items with Time Varying Stock Dependent Demand and Trade Credit under Inflation. American Journal of Operations Research,05,435-449. doi: 10.4236/ajor.2015.55036</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59840-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buzacott, J.A. (1975) Economic Order Quantity Model under Inflation. Operational Research Quarterly, 26, 553-558.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3008214</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silver, E.A. and Peterson, R. (1985) Decision Systems for Inventory Management and Production Planning. 2nd Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baker, R.C. and Urban, T.L. (1988) A Deterministic Inventory System with an Inventory Level Dependent Demand Rate. Journal of Operational Research Society, 39, 823-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.1988.142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandal, B.N. and Phaujdar, S. (1989) An Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items and Stock Dependent Consumption Rate. Journal of Operational Research Society, 40, 483-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.1989.75</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vrat, P. and Padmanabhan, G. (1990) An Inventory Model with Stock Dependent Consumption Rate under Inflation. Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 19, 379-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-188X(90)90068-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Padmanabhan, G. and Vrat, P. (1995) EOQ Models for Perishable Items with Stock Dependent Selling Rate. European Journal of Operational Research, 86, 281-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00103-J</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bose, S., Goswami, A. and Choudhuri, K.S. (1995) An EOQ Model for Deteriorating Items with Linear Time Dependent Demand Rate and Shortages under Inflation and Time Discounting. Journal of Operational Research Society, 46, 771-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.1995.107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mandal, M. and Maiti, M. (1999) An Inventory Model of Damageable Products Having Some Units in Hand with Stock Dependent Demand, Variable Replenishment Rate. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 23, 799-807.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(99)00018-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chung, K.-J. and Lin, C.-N. (2001) An Optimal Replenishment Policy for an Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items with Time Discounting. Computers and Operations Research, 28, 67-83.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00087-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chang</surname><given-names> C.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2004</year>)<article-title>An EOQ Model for Deteriorating Items under Inflation When Supplier Credits Linked to Order Quantity</article-title><source> International Journal of Production Economics</source><volume> 88</volume>,<fpage> 307</fpage>-<lpage>316</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dye, C.Y. and Ouyang, L.Y. (2005) An EOQ Model for Perishable Items with Stock Dependent Selling Rate by Allowing Shortages,. European Journal of Operational Research, 163, 776-783. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.09.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hou, K.L. (2006) An Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items with Stock Dependent Consumption Rate and Shortages under Inflation and Time Discounting. European Journal of Operational Research, 168, 463-474. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.05.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaggi, C.K., Aggarwal, K.K. and Goel, S.K. (2006) An Optimal Ordering Policy for an Inventory Model of Deteriorating Items under Inflation Induced Demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 707-714. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sana, S.S. and Chaudhuri, K.S. (2008) A Deterministic EOQ Model for Deteriorating Items with Delay in Payments Offered by the Supplier. European Journal of Operational Research, 184, 509-533. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valliathal, M. and Uthayakumar, R. (2009) An EOQ Model for Perishable Items with Stock and Time Dependent Selling Rate by Allowing Shortages. APRN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4, 8-13.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Roy, A., Maiti, M.K., Kar, S. and Maiti, M. (2009) An Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items with Stock Dependent Demand under Fuzzy Inflation and Time Discounting over a Random Planning Horizon. Applied Mathematical Modeling, 33, 744-759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2007.12.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sana, S.S. (2010) An Inventory Model for Time Varying Deteriorating Items with Optimal Selling Price and Lot Size by Allowing Shortages. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217, 185-194. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2010.05.040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chang, C.T., Teng, J.T. and Goyal, S.K. (2010) Optimal Replenishment Policies for Non Instantaneous Deteriorating Items with Stock Dependent Demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 123, 62-68. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.042</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sarkar, B., Sana, S.S. and Chaudhuri, K. (2011) An EMQ Model for an Imperfect Production Process for Time Varying Demand under Inflation and Time Value of Money. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 13543-13548.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yan</surname><given-names> X. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>An EOQ Model for Perishable Items with Freshness Dependent Demand and Partial Backlogging</article-title><source> International Journal of Control and Automation</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 19</fpage>-<lpage>38</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nagare, M. and Dutta, P. (2012) A Continuous Review Inventory Model for Perishable Products with Inventory Dependent Demand. Proceeding of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists Hong-Kong, 14-16 March 2012, 1513-1517.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sana, S.S. (2013) A Sales Team’s Initiatives and Stock Sensitive Demand under Production Control Policy. Economic Modeling, 31, 783-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59840-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, S., Lee, C. and Zhang, A.M. (2013) An Inventory Model for Perishable Products with Stock Dependent Demand and Trade Credit under Inflation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1-10. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/702939</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>