<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">WJCMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-6919</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/wjcmp.2015.53018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">WJCMP-58600</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modeling of a Cubic Antiferromagnetic Cuprate Super-Cage
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ans</surname><given-names>Hermann Otto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Materialwissenschaftliche Kristallographie, TU Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hhermann.otto@web.de</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>160</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>2</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  Convex polyhedral cuprate clusters are being formed through lateral frustration when the a and c lattice parameters of the tetragonal ACuO
  <sub>2</sub> infinite layer structure will become identical by substitution of a large cation (A = Ba
  <sup>2+</sup>). However, the corner-shared CuO
  <sub>2</sub> plaquettes of the infinite network suffer a topotactic rearrangement forming edge-connected units, for instance Cu
  <sub>18</sub>O
  <sub>24</sub> cages (polyhedron notation [4
  <sup>6</sup>4
  <sup>12</sup>3
  <sup>8</sup>]) with &lt;90&#176; ferromagnetic super-exchange interaction as found in cubic BaCuO2. Cage formation via a hypothetical tetragonal BaCuO
  <sub>2</sub> compound (space group P4/ nmm) will be discussed. The possibility to construct a cuprate super-cage with m3m symmetry (polyhedron notation [4
  <sup>6</sup>4
  <sup>12</sup>4
  <sup>24</sup>3
  <sup>8</sup>]) is being reported. This super-cage still consists of edge-connected CuO
  <sub>2</sub> plaquettes when fully decorated with copper ions, but with different curvatures, arranged in circles of 9.39 ? of diameter with 139.2&#176; Cu-O-Cu antiferromagnetic super-exchange interaction. On the one hand, the realization of such a quite stable cuprate super-cage as a candidate for high-T
  <sub>c</sub> superconductivity depends on whether a template of suitable size such as the 
  <img alt="" src="Edit_25bbd0d5-7980-4170-b884-836ec9022808.jpg" />cation or C(CH
  <sub>3</sub>)
  <sub>4</sub> enables its formation, and on the other hand the cage can further be stabilized by highly charged cations located along the [111] direction. Synthesis options will be proposed based on suggested cage formation pathways. An X-ray powder pattern was calculated for a less dense cluster structure of Im3m space group with a lattice parameter of a = 14.938 ? and two formula units of Cu
  <sub>46</sub>O
  <sub>51</sub> to facilitate future identification. Characteristic X-ray scattering features as identification tool were obtained when the electron distribution of the hollow polyhedron was approximated with electron density in a spherical shell. 
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Super-Cage</kwd><kwd> Convex Polyhedra</kwd><kwd> Cuprate</kwd><kwd> BaCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;</kwd><kwd> T-CuO</kwd><kwd> Superconductivity</kwd><kwd> Bond Strength</kwd><kwd> Frustration</kwd><kwd> X-Ray Pattern</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Almost thirty years of intense research on high-T<sub>c</sub> superconductors have elapsed this year. Since the discovery of high-T<sub>c</sub> superconductivity by Bednorz and M&#252;ller in 1986 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref1">1</xref>] , rich results have been obtained in distinct fields of science and technology, physics, solid state chemistry, material science and crystallography. Many comprehensive papers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref4">4</xref>] report on the great variety of new crystal structures of superconducting compounds, often showing an optimum hole doping as intrinsic quality. Owing to the ability of the d<sup>9</sup> transition metal ion to form, apart from 3D networks, chains, ladders, and small and medium clusters, copper compounds are among the most interesting phases. Low-dimensional quantum spin systems are of considerable theoretical and experimental interest together with new applications to which they may lead. The Cu<sup>2+</sup> ion owes its network forming property to a high electronegativity, similar to Si<sup>4+</sup>, but in contrast to the tetrahedral networks of Si<sup>4+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup> mainly forms oxo-compounds with chains and networks of connected “octahedra”. In the crystal structure of CuSiO<sub>3</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref6">6</xref>] , isostructural to CuGeO<sub>3</sub>, such “octahedral” edge-connected chains are combined with ideally stretched corner-connected silicate tetrahedral ones.</p><p>Cupric oxide cages of both corner-connected and edge-shared CuO octahedra, formed around 6-membered silicate rings and H<sub>2</sub>O, are found in the crystal structure of the gemstone dioptase, Cu<sub>6</sub>Si<sub>6</sub>O<sub>18</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O. Crystal water can escape on heating trough openings in the cages. Whereas magnetic properties have been extensively investigated, the synthesis of pure dioptase is not successful yet but may benefit from ideas of cluster formation expressed in this work.</p><p>It came as a great surprise when Sigrist et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref7">7</xref>] succeeded in synthesizing Ca<sub>0.86</sub>Sr<sub>0.14</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub>, a very simple compound of tetragonal symmetry (space group P4/mmm) with lattice parameters of a = 3.8611(2) &#197; and c = 3.1995(2) &#197; and Z = 1, which they named parent structure of the layered high-temperature superconductors. Other authors call it infinite-layer or all-layer compound owing to the feature that the structure may be described as oxygen-deficient perovskite that has lost a complete oxygen layer thus making the large Ca<sup>2+</sup> or Sr<sup>3+</sup> cations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref8">8</xref>] -coordinated instead of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref12">12</xref>] -coordinated and leaving infinite CuO<sub>2</sub> layers with square-coordinated Cu<sup>2+</sup> instead of octahedral layers. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> depicts the CuO<sub>2</sub> net of the parent structure, one of the building blocks of most high-T<sub>c</sub> superconducting compounds. It should be noted that the CuO<sub>4</sub> squares in the infinite CuO<sub>2</sub> layers are corner-connected.</p><p>Recently, Siemons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref8">8</xref>] discovered that cupric oxide could be epitaxially grown as thin film on a (100) SrTiO<sub>3</sub> substrate in a tetragonally elongated rocksalt structure with lattice parameters of a = 3.905 &#197; and c = 5.32 &#197;, as a result of the Jahn-Teller effect [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref9">9</xref>] . The existence of such an edge-connected T-CuO net is exciting as it will serve to support my ideas of cagey cluster formation and synthesis routes. Without substrate support, the planar CuO net suffers folding in two directions resulting in the monoclinic tenorite structure. The folding of the T-CuO net may be accompanied by a latent Cu<sup>1+</sup>-Cu<sup>3+</sup> disproportionation, which can help to better understand</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Corner-connected cuprate plaquettes, representing the building units of high-T<sub>c</sub> superconductors</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x6.png"/></fig><p>the high-T<sub>c</sub> multiferroic properties and frustration induced spiral spin-ordering of this compound.</p><p>Turning back to the parent structure, the already known crystal structures of similar compounds of the larger group II elements Sr and Ba are very complex and less dense compared to the parent structure. The cubic compound BaCuO<sub>2</sub> showing distinct copper-oxygen clusters has really a large lattice parameter of a = 18.2855(3) &#197; and contains Z = 90 formula units in its unit cell. In contrast to the infinite layer structure, the CuO<sub>4</sub> quadrilaterals of the clusters are edge-connected. The <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> polyhedral cluster is depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>The question arises, why BaCuO<sub>2</sub> does not exist in the simple prototypic structure of the parent compound, explicitly disregarding air-sensitive and highly strained BaCuO<sub>2</sub> epitaxial layers. Since the &lt;90˚ super-exchange interaction of edge-connected clusters is unfavourable for the development of superconducting properties, the idea emerges to construct a super-cage cluster of cuprate units with larger radius of curvature and then &gt;90˚ Cu-O-Cu antiferromagnetic super-exchange interaction favouring high-T<sub>c</sub> superconductivity.</p><p>Promising new opportunities such as crystal structure prediction from first principles (Woodley and Catlow [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref10">10</xref>] ) or application of advanced tiling theory for the systematic generation of 4-connected crystalline networks (Forster et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref11">11</xref>] ) have stimulated condensed matter sciences. In addition, the recent discovery of a new class of convex Goldberg polyhedra (Schein and Gayed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref12">12</xref>] ) should encourage scientists to synthesize such cages. For example, the successful synthesis of earlier predicted, yet not perfectly smooth B<sub>40</sub> boronspherene shows what possible is [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref13">13</xref>] . The cuprate super-cage may as well a worthwhile object of synthesis effort in the near future.</p><p>A summary assessment of synthesis routes and crystal chemistry of infinite-layer compounds in contrast to the cubic cluster compound BaCuO<sub>2</sub> suggests an explanation of cluster formation, finally leading to the proposal of a cuprate super-cage structure.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Planar Cuprate Networks versus Polyhedral Clusters</title><p>The formation and crystal chemistry of two ACuO<sub>2</sub> structure types are summarized in the appendix: the simple “infinite-layer” Ca<sub>0.86</sub>Sr<sub>0.14</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> structure type and the very complex BaCuO<sub>2</sub> type. Ca<sub>0.86</sub>Sr<sub>0.14</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> is tetragonal, space group P4/mmm, with lattice parameters of a = 3.8611(2) &#197;, c = 3.1995(2) &#197;. In contrast, the BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structure is cubic, space group Im3m, but shows a very large lattice parameter of a = 18.2855(3) &#197;, obviously indicative of a conflicting formation scenario. A series of compounds are known with infinite-layer structure type with steadily increasing c lattice parameters, obtained by the substitution of Ca<sup>2+</sup> by the larger Sr<sup>2+</sup> and Ba<sup>2+</sup> ions (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>For the case of an unstrained fictive infinite-layer BaCuO<sub>2</sub> end member the c lattice parameter would reach or exceed the separation of the initially larger a parameter. At that point the two-dimensional CuO<sub>2</sub> nets of the</p><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> (a) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>cluster of the cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structure consisting of closed strips of edge- sharing CuO<sub>4</sub> squares. (b) Unfolded hemi-polyhedron of that cluster showing edge-connected CuO units.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x8.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x9.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Infinite-layer compounds of ACuO<sub>2</sub> composition, A = Ca, Sr, Ba. a.e.&gt; represents the mean radius in &#197; of the alkaline earth ions according to the formula in the surrounding of 8 oxygen atoms</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Formula</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Lattice parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a.e.&gt;</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remark</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >a(&#197;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >c(&#197;)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BaCuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90?</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >highly strained</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BaCuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96<sup>*)</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >fictive values</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.92 (3.94)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2・3.965</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >orthorhombic</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba<sub>0.33</sub>Sr<sub>0.67</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SrCuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.926</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(Sr<sub>0.7</sub>Ca<sub>0.3</sub>)<sub>0.9</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.902</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>c</sub> = 110 K (p-type)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.33</sub>Ca<sub>0.67</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.878</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.259</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.14</sub>Ca<sub>0.86</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.861</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >prototypic compound</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sr<sub>0.09</sub>Ca<sub>0.91</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.858</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaCuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >extrapolated parameters</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca<sub>0.98</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.856</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >high gas-pressure synthesis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S<sub>0.84</sub>Nd<sub>0.16</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.942</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>c</sub> = 43 K (n-type)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*)</sup>lattice parameters obtained by bond strength―bond length calculations.</p><p>infinite-layer structure turn into different sorts of cuprate clusters, characteristic for the actual BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structure. This rolling-up of the CuO<sub>2</sub> nets forming clusters is explained by lattice spacing frustration. This occurs when the separation between the CuO<sub>2</sub> layers of the infinite-layer structure exceeds the translation period a within the layer. In this case infinite CuO<sub>2</sub> nets have the chance to be formed in all three directions but are not allowed to exist in all.</p><p>The end member BaCuO<sub>2</sub>, as already mentioned, hardly exists in the parent structure as less strained compound. Its fictive lattice parameters shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> were obtained by bond strength―bond length calculation. For Ba<sup>2+</sup> surrounded by 8 oxygen atoms in a regular fashion, one obtains the Ba-O distance of d = 2.800 &#197;, using the empirical formula of Brown and Shannon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref14">14</xref>] that was rewritten into the specialized equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where s represents the bond valence (valence divided by the coordination number). The parameters used are d<sub>0</sub> = 2.297 &#197; and N = 7 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref15">15</xref>] . The length of the c axis is then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> &#197;, equal to the a parameter. It would be also possible to obtain an extrapolation of the a and c lattice parameters, respectively when these parameters of the compound series are plotted against the mean ionic radii of the group II elements (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The lattice parameters a increase only slightly from about 3.85 &#197; to 3.96 &#197; owing to the strength of the covalent bonds of the planar CuO<sub>2</sub> nets thus obviating much strain. More crystal-chemical details are summarized below as supplementary information.</p><p>The results provide a possible explanation of the astonishing structural differences between the infinite-layer and the cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structures. The degeneracy of the lattice parameters is all equal for of BaCuO<sub>2</sub> in the fictive all-layer structure, or at least the c lattice parameter exceeding the a lattice parameter. This has the consequence that this structure is non-existent, because it is impossible that CuO<sub>2</sub> layers can be formed in all three dimensions, only fragments of such layers could grow. However, potential layer fragments will be unstable against folding and will close into clusters, a mechanism well consistent with cubic symmetry. The formation of different clusters can reduce the strain in the structure and finally leads to the observed large unit cell of the actual structure. The degeneracy of lattice spacing is evidently the reason for the formation of the complex BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structure required to overcome the lateral frustration.</p><p>Let us draw attention again to the very simple BaCuO<sub>2</sub> stoichiometry. Does the structure retain some memory of its formation history? Could it be that the first small nuclei formed, occur as infinite-layer blocks with simple</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Plot of lattice parameters versus mean ionic radii for infinite layer compounds (square symbols) as listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The circles indicate extrapolated values for pure, non-existent CaCuO<sub>2</sub> according to a linear regression. The arrow-marked diamond symbol depicts the fictive parameter (a and c equal) for BaCuO<sub>2</sub> in the infinite layer structure, which is non-existent in this structure type under ambient conditions. The vertical dashed line indicates the assumed phase borderline between the infinite-layer and the cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> prototypes</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x13.png"/></fig><p>stoichiometry, maybe as three-dimensional chessboard-like ordered assemblies, and then pass on this simple stoichiometry before the structural transformation to cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> happens? If so, we have to explain the origin of different connections of the CuO<sub>2</sub> squares, first being corner-connected and then edge-connected.</p><p>Fluctuations in the concentration or growth conditions (thermodynamic variables) are responsible for structural distortions, which have been observed by electron-microscopy in the parent structure. For instance, occasionally small clusters in the form of CuO<sub>5</sub> pyramids exist in compounds of high Ba content near the end member composition, but the general layer structure still persists [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref16">16</xref>] . Thus the members with high Ba content already indicate a certain readiness for structural phase transition.</p><p>If the c lattice parameter approaches the a-axis length, oxygen can penetrate into the otherwise oxygen-free Ba layer with simultaneous oxygen depletion of the CuO<sub>2</sub> layer. The stoichiometry tells us that in the limiting case one T-CuO layer with twice as many Cu could sandwich two BaO layers. Locally, nano-scaled phase separation may occur into rocksalt-type BaO and T-CuO, but a complete separation is excluded because of the high reactivity of BaO. The lattice parameter of BaO of a = 5.534 &#197; matches almost perfectly that of T-CuO with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, strongly suggesting the possibility for a topotactic intergrowth at nano-scale dimension. Then we are faced with edge-connected T-CuO fragments containing peripherally edge-dangling bonds, which may easily curl up into polyhedral cages. Another possibility is the existence of a hypothetical BaCuO<sub>2</sub> phase with tetragonal symmetry that would show nearly perfect lattice dimensions for a topotactic reaction, too. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> illustrates this model structure of space group P4/nmm with lattice parameters of a = 3.87 &#197; and c = 8.20 &#197;. A puckered edge-connected CuO layer of alternatively up and down directed CuO pyramids is sandwiched between layers of BaO with 9-fold oxygen environment, representing the average of the rocksalt and the perovskite coordinations ([<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref6">6</xref>] + [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref12">12</xref>])/2 = [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref9">9</xref>]), similar to the La<sup>3+</sup> coordination in La<sub>2</sub>CuO<sub>4</sub>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> show the atomic coordinates and bond lengths and bond angles, respectively. X-ray powder data are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p><p>Notably, a long time ago this simulated structure was considered responsible for unstable superconductivity at very high T<sub>c </sub>= 220 K [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref17">17</xref>] . Its formation as ultrathin film, possibly peroxide-expanded because of oxygenation during the experiment, was conjectured as intermediate reaction layer between the chosen (110)-SrTiO<sub>3</sub> substrate and the YBa<sub>2</sub>Cu<sub>3</sub>O<sub>7-X </sub>superconducting<sub> </sub>film. More recently, it was assumed that filamentory superconductivity at 220 K is caused by a small content of oxygen depleted cupric oxide CuO<sub>1-x</sub> within the multi-phase sample [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref18">18</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref20">20</xref>] . Crystallographic data of the different BaCuO<sub>2</sub> phases are compared in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>Remarkably, BaO transforms under a pressure of 18 GPa into the PbO type sheet structure with a P4/nmm space group identical to that of the BaCuO<sub>2</sub> model structure, with lattice parameters of a = 4.397(7) &#197; and c = 3.196(5) &#197; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref21">21</xref>] . In this structure Ba is located off-centre between 8-coordinating oxygen atoms.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Hypothetical crystal structure of tetragonal BaCuO<sub>2</sub> with a = 3.87 &#197;, c = 8.20 &#197;, space group P4/nmm (No. 129/1). Unit cell yellow outlined, Cu blue, Ba green, O red</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x15.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Atomic coordinates of hypothetical BaCuO<sub>2</sub>, tetragonal space group P4/nmm (No. 129/1) with lattice parameters of a = 3.87 &#197;, c = 8.20 &#197;, Z = 2</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atom</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >z</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >?0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.255</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.315</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Bond lengths (&#197;) and bond valence sums, respectively of hypothetical BaCuO<sub>2</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atoms</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ba</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#215; 1.9669</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#215; 2.8489</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#215; 2.7804 3.5260</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bond valence sum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref5">5</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref9">9</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Calculated X-ray powder pattern for hypothetical BaCuO<sub>2</sub> (Cu-Kα<sub>1</sub> radiation, λ = 1.5406 &#197;)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >2Θ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>calc</sub>/I<sub>0 </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >hkl</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.871</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.658</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >002</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.430</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.737</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >003</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2366</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.142</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >004</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.917</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9350</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8833</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7499</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >202</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.115</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6934</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.385</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >203</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.345</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.578</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4662</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.380</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4072</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >204</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.524</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3683</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.615</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >006</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of crystallographic data for distinct BaCuO<sub>2</sub> phases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Symmetry</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a(&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c(&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>0</sub>(&#197;<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Z</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >D<sub>x</sub>(g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Comment</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >cubic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6113.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cluster</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >tetragonal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >frustrated</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.057</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >strained</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >hypothetical</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The investigation of frustration is a current research field of physics and mostly applied to spin systems and magnetism. In geometrically frustrated structures magnets are unable to attain order by virtue of their local geometric arrangement. A prominent example is the frustration-induced spiral ordering of spins of the high-T<sub>c</sub> multiferroic monoclinic CuO (Kimura et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref23">23</xref>] ). However, pure mechanical systems can also be frustrated. Examples are the multitude of ice structures and the way, in which the hydrogen atoms of the polar H<sub>2</sub>O molecule can order with two hydrogen atoms nearby and two further away from the oxygen atom. A further example of a frustrated system is the isotropic negative thermal expansion (contraction) of ZrW<sub>2</sub>O<sub>8</sub> over a wide temperature range including room temperature owing to transverse thermal motion of a non-bonded oxygen atom on the apex of the ZrO<sub>8</sub> octahedron. Here, the mechanical under-constraint is reminiscent of magnetic spin systems (Ramirez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref24">24</xref>] ). In our case of the fictive infinite-layer structure of BaCuO<sub>2</sub> we are dealing simply with a sort of lateral frustration. This may simply be considered as the inability of structural building units to attain order in the simplest arrangements possible. Any which way nature reacts to this situation, the cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structure is unprecedented in its complexity.</p><p>Although p-type current carriers are found for the cubic BaCuO<sub>2+δ</sub> prototype with δ = 0.07, superconductivity was never observed. This is attributed not so much to a non-optimum hole doping as to the &lt;90˚ Cu-O-Cu super-exchange interaction and the stiffness of the edge-sharing cuprate strips, which form the clusters and show a distance of less than 2.7 &#197; among Cu atoms, compared with more than 3.8 &#197; of the corner-sharing cuprate layer of superconducting compounds.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Proposal for a Cuprate Super-Cage</title><p>The topology and stoichiometry of cuprate cages can be described with the symbol <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denoting a convex polyhedron with polygon multiplicities p<sub>i</sub> of faces f<sub>i</sub>. The number of edges e of the polyhedron counts as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula143"><label>. (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying Euler’s topologic invariant for convex polyhedra [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref25">25</xref>] ,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula144"><label>, (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the number of corner c yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula145"><label>, (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which equals the oxygen number of the cage, whereas the number of decorated faces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> corresponds to the</p><p>number of copper atoms. In the cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> structure, the octahedral faces of the [4<sup>6</sup>4<sup>12</sup>3<sup>8</sup>] polyhedron are not occupied by Cu. Therefore, the cage formula is found to be Cu<sub>6+12</sub>O<sub>24</sub>.</p><p>One may ask, which properties a cluster compound of corner-sharing cuprate stripes might show. A cluster, extending its cage diameter by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> compared to the edge-sharing [4<sup>6</sup>4<sup>12</sup>3<sup>8</sup>] polyhedron, may be formed in the presence of a suitable template, for instance, TMA<sup>+</sup> or TMM. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> depicts a possible solution of m3m symmetry with the polyhedron notation [4<sup>6</sup>4<sup>12</sup>4<sup>24</sup>3<sup>8</sup>] and a diameter along [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref001">001</xref>] of about 9.39 &#197;. The polyhedron is constructed of copper-centred oxygen quadrilaterals corresponding to a cube in combination with a rhombic dodecahedron. The coordination of copper atoms of the dodecahedron is that of a very flat tetrahedral disphenoid with O-Cu-O bond angles around 122.4˚ in order to adapt well the copper oxygen bond lengths. Such coordination is frequently observed, for example in the crystal structure of dioptase. Weakly deformed quadrilaterals of a further {211} trapezohedron are expected to be occupied by copper, too. It should be stressed that the formerly corner-connected arrangement of the plaquettes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) changes with this additional decoration to edge-connected ones (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). Finally, the polyhedron is closed by an octahedron.</p><p>If all faces of the polyhedron are occupied by copper, a formula of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> would result. The super-cages can be arranged in a cubic lattice of space group Im3m with a lattice parameter of a = 14.938 &#197; in such a way that copper at the 1/4, 1/4, 1/4 site connects neighbouring cages (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The cage separation from each other is chosen in such a way that a trigonally stretched oxygen ‘octahedron’ is arranged around this copper atom. The</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> [4<sup>6</sup>4<sup>12</sup>4<sup>24</sup>3<sup>8</sup>] super-cage polyhedron with 9.39 &#197; diameter down [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref001">001</xref>], showing for reasons of clarity, apart from red oxygen atoms, only the decoration of the 4<sup>6</sup> and the 4<sup>12</sup> faces with copper in light blue colour. This reduced decoration would lead to corner-sharing cuprate plaquettes</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x23.png"/></fig><p>bond length of 1.894 &#197; may be a bit small for this Jahn-Teller cation, but favours an occupation with highly charged other ions such as Ge<sup>4+</sup>. Even though one would somewhat enlarge the lattice parameter in order to match the ideal environment for copper in the 2+ oxidation state, there is no need to change much the distance, if this cation is 3+ charged.</p><p>In the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref100">100</xref>] direction an additional oxygen atom at the 1/2, 0, 0 site can bond the cages through elongated CuO<sub>5</sub> pyramids. Then the unit-cell content amounts to 2 formula units of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, giving a calculated density of D<sub>calc</sub> = 3.73 g・cm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup>. Charge compensation may be adapted by some Cu<sup>3+</sup>, equivalent to intrinsic O<sup>1</sup><sup>−</sup> hole doping, or by a few interstitial cations such as the large Ba<sup>2+</sup>, apart from the possibility of choosing positively charged template ions or Ge<sup>4+</sup> instead of copper at the 8c site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). With the option to use cations other than copper one is inclined to speak of a cuprate compound, in the other case we are dealing simply with a cagey cupric oxide.</p><p>Atomic coordinate and bond length respectively bond angle of the hypothetic structure are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> respectively <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>. In addition, an X-ray powder pattern was calculated for rapid identification in case of synthesis success, characterized by two very strong peaks with d-values of 7.47&#197; respectively 6.10 &#197; (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>). The cluster calculation method is to refine a trial structure step by step using bond length and bond angles as geometrical constraints together with oxygen-oxygen distances, finally adapting the required bond valence sums. To calculate the Cu-O bond valance sum by the empirical Brown relation s = Σ(d/d<sub>0</sub>)<sup>−</sup><sup>N</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref15">15</xref>] the new coefficients d<sub>0</sub> = 1.713(9) &#197; and N = 5.76(0.16) were used. The calculations were carried out using the software modules of Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref26">26</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Fully decorated cuprate super-cage with 4<sup>6</sup> and 4<sup>12</sup> faces centered with light blue copper atoms, 4<sup>24</sup> with blue ones respectively 4<sup>8 </sup>ones<sup> </sup>capped<sup> </sup>with green colored atoms. The cage deviates somewhat from a sphere towards a cube</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x25.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Proposed atomic coordinates for a cluster structure of space group Im3m (No. 229) with the lattice parameter of a = 14.938 &#197;. Cage radii for the different ions are given as r<sub>c</sub>(&#197;) = <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively c&gt; as ion-specific weighted ones. Further, an additionally electron number weighted radius R (&#197;) is introduced</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atoms</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >site</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >x</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >y</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >z</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >r<sub>c </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >c&gt;</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12e</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31435</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.696</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >4.877</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22762</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22762</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.809</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48m</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28003</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.957</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(4) or Ge<sup>4+ </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48j</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12990</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31330</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.066</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >5.356</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48k</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.647</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1/2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Mean polyhedron radius R, weighted by individual electron numbers (Cu = 29, O = 8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.981</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Calculated bond length (&#197;), Cu-O-Cu bond angles (˚) and bond valence sums s of the super-cage structure</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atoms</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O(1)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O(2)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >O(3)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >s</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#215; 1.9405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7733</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#215; 1.9414</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#215; 1.9163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#215; 1.9463</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#215; 1.9379</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(4)<sup>*)</sup> or Ge<sup>4+ </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#215; 1.8938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.33 4.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.744</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.734</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(1)?O?Cu(1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(1)?O?Cu(2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(2)?O?Cu(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(2)?O?Cu(4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(3)?O?Cu(3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >O?Cu(2)?O</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*)</sup>If this site could be actually filled with Cu<sup>2+</sup> ions, then the lattice parameter can be adapted in order to enlarge the Cu(4)-O bond length to a more realistic value near 2.07 &#197;.</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Calculated X-ray powder pattern of the super-cage structure (Cu-Kα<sub>1</sub> radiation, λ = 1.5406 &#197;)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >2Θ</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >d</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >I<sub>calc</sub>/I<sub>0 </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >hkl</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.364</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.839</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.470</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.513</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >211</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.773</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.281</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.724</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >310</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.580</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >222</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.249</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.807</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.735</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.521</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >330/411</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.666</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >420</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.994</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >332</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >422</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.489</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.9295</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510/431</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.812</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7273</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >521</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.920</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6407</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5618</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >530/433</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4897</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >600/442</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4233</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >611/532</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.069</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3619</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >620</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >541</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2520</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >622</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.943</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2025</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >631</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1561</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >444</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1126</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >550/710/543</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.660</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0715</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >640</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0328</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >721/552/633</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Since the suggested templates lack a centre of symmetry, one could adapt this fact to the cage structure, too, and hence would create an acentric space group such as I432 with more degrees of freedom to account for energetically favoured bond lengths and angles, respectively. However, this option has not been calculated in detail.</p><p>The cluster would shows different paths of &gt;90˚ antiferromagnetic Cu-O-Cu super-exchange interaction (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>), a prerequisite for superconductivity. For instance, the Cu(1)-O-Cu(2) bond angle amounts to Φ = 139.2˚, resulting in an assumed principal super-exchange interaction of J<sub>z</sub>(Φ) = 0.091(Φ - 90)<sup>1.651 </sup>meV ≈ 56.6 meV (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref27">27</xref>] , respectively).</p><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Principal super-exchange interaction J<sub>z</sub>(Φ) versus Cu-O-Cu bond angle Φ (afm = antiferromagnetic, fm = ferromagnetic). The red arrow marks the cuprate super-cage position. This relation was first published by Rocquefelte et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref27">27</xref>] . Data for minerals outlined in blue like dioptase have been added and included in the J<sub>z</sub>(Φ) fit by the present author</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x27.png"/></fig><p>The cluster compound is expected to carry a super-current through its lattice, when optimum doped. Besides superconductivity one should think about other properties like light-harvesting features for solar cell application, relying on ball antennas instead of linearly extended ones. In this case also other non-cage atoms such as iodine replacing oxygen or Sn<sup>4+</sup> replacing Ge<sup>4+</sup> should be also considered to enhance the solar efficiency.</p><p>A synthesis route is proposed as follows. First, ultrathin T-CuO films may be deposited onto a substrate such as (001)-oriented SrTiO<sub>3 </sub>by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) using a CuO target (Siemons et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref28">28</xref>] ; Samal et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref29">29</xref>] ). Then, this film is peeled off from the surface by assistance of a surfactant, simultaneously offering a template, around which T-CuO film fragments can roll up. The free accessible space of the super-cage to be filled with the template is about 6.63 &#197; (smallest cage diameter of 9.39 &#197; minus diameter of 2.76 &#197; for an oxygen atom). Two quaternary organic templates of about the same Van der Waals dimension of 6.3 &#197; are favoured to accomplish well such space filling: the cation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (TMA<sup>+</sup>) and C(CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>4</sub> (TMM), respectively. Finally, crystallization of a clusters structure may be supported by some suitable cations offered, which could interconnect the cages and provide charge neutrality.</p><p>Besides SrTiO<sub>3</sub>, as the most favourable substrate, one should consider also BaO in the rocksalt type, but considering the limitations formulated in the previous chapters.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Characteristic of X-Ray Scattering from Hollow Polyhedral Structures</title><p>The X-ray powder pattern of the cubic cuprate super-cage structure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>) was calculated with the aid of the FullProf program (Carvajal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref30">30</xref>] ). It shows a pronounced intensity modulation of the peaks, which can be understood as resulting from a uniform electron density distribution ρ on the shell of a hollow sphere of radius r<sub>s</sub>, approximating the empty polyhedral cage. Because the copper atoms, occupying the face centers of the polyhedron, have smaller distances to the cage center compared to the oxygen atoms at the corners, an electron density weighted radius R will be introduced (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>Calculating the structure factor F(k) as the Fourier transform of the radial charge density ρ(r), the property of the Dirac delta function δ is used, where the integral of δ times some other function f(r) is equal to the value of f(r) at the position of δ:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula146"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Following in part the calculation concept of Alloul and Lyle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref31">31</xref>] applied to C<sub>60</sub> buckyballs, one obtains the scale factor A from the total number N<sub>e</sub> of electrons of the polyhedron, confined to a shell of radius R as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula147"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using polar coordinates r, φ, θ, for spherically symmetric functions, one obtains d<sup>3</sup>r = r<sup>2</sup>drdφsinθdθ. Then the Fourier transform yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula148"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula149"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting cosθ = ζ gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula150"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula151"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, the intensity results as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58600-formula152"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Replacing |k| = k = 2π/d with the interplanar spacing<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it can be seen that</p><p>I(k) shows zeros for R/d = n/2 with integer n and maxima near<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively. A more exact solution, reflecting the slope of the denominator function, may be applied to calculate the radius R from d or k values assigned to the ‘corrected’ maxima of order n:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. (11)</p><p>In addition, the intensity I(k) of an actual powder pattern has to be corrected for LpG factors and overall atomic displacement exp(−2T), respectively. This was applied in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> to display the modulated intensity of the super-cage structure.</p><p>Subtracting this modulation from the actual pattern would indicate reflections with a pronounced contribution of non-cage atoms. It should be stressed that some complication results when the sphere is inflated towards a cube as shown above in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The Fourier transform for such rounded cube will be calculated and published later.</p><p>The outlined concept is particularly favorable for the analysis of unknown cage structures. One can simply calculated the center of gravity k<sub>g</sub> of a batch of foremost intense reflections, corrected by LpG and exp(-2T), and therefrom determine the cage radius R using Equation (11). This information may be important to rapidly solve the complete crystal structure.</p><p>Although the chosen example of the super-cage model is not ideal insofar as it deviates somewhat from the spherical shape with diminishing characteristic diffraction features at high k values, the recovery of the (predetermined) super-cage radius R using Equation (11) gives still a remarkable result (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>).</p><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Spherical shell diffraction pattern (red) enveloping the super-cage X-ray powder pattern (blue). Coinciding reflections were slightly offset side by side</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x40.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Redetermination of the cage radius R from reflection batches around the maxima of I(k), yielding a mean value of R = 5.00 &#197;</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Order of Maximum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >k<sup>−1</sup> (&#197;) (center of gravity)<sup> </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >f(z)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R(&#197;) = f(z)・k<sup>−1</sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.973</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6631</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.7267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.124</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.9046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.965</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3528</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0664</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.963</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>Possible formation pathways of cupric oxide clusters of cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub> are analysed in this article. The author has entertained the idea to construct more voluminous CuO clusters, the larger radii of curvature of which allows greater than 90˚ Cu-O-Cu bonding angles and possible antiferromagnetic super-exchange interaction as a prerequisite for high-T<sub>c</sub> superconductivity. An Cu(1)-O-Cu(2) exchange pathway within such <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> super-cage of 9.39 &#197; diameter shows a bond angle of Φ = 139.2˚. Cupric oxide super-cage formation around templates such as TMA<sup>+</sup> or TMM is suggested, whereby epitaxially grown ultrathin films of T-CuO are thought to deliver edge-connected CuO fragments that curl up around such guest molecules. Besides superconductivity the super-cage polyhedra can act in ball antennas for sunlight harvesting, when suitably doped, for instance with tin and iodine, respectively as inter-cage bonding entities.</p><p>An X-ray powder pattern was also calculated for a super-cage structure of space group Im3m and a lattice parameter of 14.938 &#197;. This identification possibility was supplemented by hollow sphere scattering calculations, approximating the electron distribution on the polyhedron through a radial shell electron density assumption. Characteristics of such X-ray scattering may serve to identify unknown hollow clusters. In addition, model calculations have suggested a new tetragonal BaCuO<sub>2</sub> phase of space group P4/nmm with up and down puckered pyramidal T-CuO nets, a possibly step towards edge-connected cluster formation.</p><p>Research into novel copper oxide clusters may also stimulate associated scientific fields similar to carbon clusters with their full basket of remarkable properties, all the more so since the T-CuO net shows similar low- energy excitations as the CuO<sub>2</sub> net of the known high-T<sub>c</sub> superconductors (Moser et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref32">32</xref>] ). Materials scientists are encouraged to attempt their synthesis.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author wishes to thank Prof. Dr. R. B. Heimann for critical reading of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hans HermannOtto, (2015) Modeling of a Cubic Antiferromagnetic Cuprate Super-Cage. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics,05,160-178. doi: 10.4236/wjcmp.2015.53018</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>A1. Supplementary Information Used in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, Respectively</title><p>Of all available information about the a lattice parameters for superconducting cuprates and related phases build-up of square-planar CuO<sub>2</sub> layers and containing high Ba content, the upper limit appears to be 3.96 &#197;. The dependence of lattice parameters on the averaged alkaline earth ion radius of the parent structure compounds was first illustrated by Takano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref33">33</xref>] and then by Sakurai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref34">34</xref>] . In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> this data, including the data subsequently reported for CaCuO<sub>2</sub>, Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> and BaCuO<sub>2</sub> compounds, are drawn differently to support my intention. However, some details need a further consideration. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> straight lines represent results of a linear regression using only the first five consecutive lattice parameter values. Extrapolation to the pure Ca compound revealed the parameters a = 3.85 &#197; and c = 3.17 &#197; in agreement with the experimental results of Karpinsky et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref35">35</xref>] . Takano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref36">36</xref>] reported extrapolated values of 3.849 &#197; and 3.160 &#197;, respectively. Of the pure Sr compound to the few available compounds with substituted Ba for Sr the a lattice parameters deviate from the linear curve to yield an upper value of about 3.93 &#197;. However, a quadratic regression curve extends well to the 3.96 &#197; value of the fictive BaCuO<sub>2</sub>. In a more complicated manner behaves the c lattice parameter on substitution of Ba. The compounds with high Ba content show c lattice parameters and densities, deviating more strongly to lower or higher values as expected from the assumed trend. Takano et al. (1989) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref33">33</xref>] did not explicitly report the lattice parameters for Ba<sub>0.33</sub>Sr<sub>0.67</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> that I extracted from their picture given and from the related X-ray powder pattern. However, the peaks on this pattern are very broad. In addition, some peaks exist at low diffraction angles of the pattern that I attribute to the presence of cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub>. Hence, the given Ba<sub>0.33</sub>Sr<sub>0.67</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> composition may be altered to one with slightly lower Ba content. However, the Ba-rich compound Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> may be a special case as its structure exhibits an ordering of the Sr and Ba ions in layers parallel to (001) with a different layer thickness of 3.64 &#197; and 4.29 &#197;, respectively. At first sight the large separation of the Ba layer appears to contradict my hypothesis further explained below. Given the a lattice parameter constraint as a result of tensile stress of the CuO<sub>2</sub> net, the distinct bond strength of the two ions are leading to the different layer thickness observed, and consequently the structure expands in the c direction. The cationic ordering may be energetically favourable. One could argue that Sr layers, located between two Ba layers, can act as a sort of substrate for the Ba layer to grow upon and thus stabilize this layer. Whatever the argument is, the result is a compound near the stability limit of the infinite layer prototype with a remarkably low density of about D<sub>x</sub> = 5.64 g∙cm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup>, showing for the first time that the lattice parameter c’ = c/2 (because of the cell doubling) exceeds the a parameter by only a small margin. Owing to this complication the third-order regression curve in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> may be taken only as guide to the eye to indicate the tendency of the c lattice parameter development up to the fictive BaCuO<sub>2</sub> composition. It should be stressed that for the actual member of the Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> solid solution the structural change from tetragonal to orthorhombic with lattice parameters of a = 3.92 &#197; and b = 3.94 &#197; already indicates that the otherwise squared CuO<sub>2</sub> net may suffer a lateral distortion in compositions with high Ba content.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>A2. History of Synthesis Routes and Crystal Chemistry of Infinite Layer Cuprates and Cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub></title><p>First, additional details will be summarized that have been reported on the crystal-chemistry and materials synthesis effort of both compounds. This may lead to better understanding of the crystallographic conclusion drawn from this information. In the course of superconductor research different compounds, isostructural or similar to the parent structure, have been obtained. Some of these compounds show superconducting properties, if hole-doping by off-stoichiometry or electron-doping by substitution of elements with higher valence is done. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> summarizes these infinite-layer compounds with their lattice parameters. The CaCuO<sub>2</sub> end member does not exist under ambient conditions as a stable compound of this structure type, but can be prepared under high gas pressure together with a defined oxygen partial pressure. The resulting compound shows a small off-stoichiometry of about Ca<sub>0.98</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> (Karpinsky et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref35">35</xref>] ). The lattice parameters were determined to be a = 3.8556(6) &#197; and c = 3.1805(4) &#197;. The infinite layer compound is found as building unit in many high T<sub>c</sub> superconductors, the lattice parameters of which may also be derived from an extrapolation of the parameters for these compounds. In addition, the other end member BaCuO<sub>2</sub>, as already mentioned, is non-existent as unstrained parent structure type, but can be formed as a highly strained epitaxially grown compound. The fictive parameters for the non-strained compound are obtained by bond strength ? bond length calculation.</p><p>The application of high pressure to transform the less dense compounds of the orthorhombic SrCuO<sub>2</sub> structure type (Teske and M&#252;ller-Buschbaum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref37">37</xref>] to the denser type of the infinite-layer structure was first reported by Takano et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref33">33</xref>] . The phases Sr<sub>1/3</sub>Ca<sub>2/3</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> and SrCuO<sub>2</sub> have been obtained. Whereas non superconducting in its ambient pressure prototypic composition, the newly discovered infinite-layer phase became an electron- doped superconductor by substitution of some alkaline earth ions by Nd<sup>3+</sup>. Understanding the importance of the in-plane bond length of CuO<sub>2</sub> nets for the appearance of superconducting properties, Smith et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref38">38</xref>] obtained the compound Sr<sub>0.84</sub>Nd<sub>0.16</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> at 1273 K and 25 MPa with a transition temperature of 40 K, remarkably high for an n-type material. Meanwhile T<sub>c</sub> could be enhanced to ≤43 K (Er et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref39">39</xref>] ). Hiroi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref40">40</xref>] pressed their cuprate samples isostatically up to 6 GPa at 1273 K and succeeded in the synthesis of the first p-type superconductor Sr<sub>1-x</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> (T<sub>c</sub> = 100 K) of the infinite-layer type. Later, Azuma et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref41">41</xref>] prepared under similar conditions compounds ranging from Ca<sub>2/3</sub>Sr<sub>1/3</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> through SrCuO<sub>2</sub> to Ba<sub>1/3</sub>Sr<sub>2/3</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub>. Azuma et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref41">41</xref>] and Hiroi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref42">42</xref>] reported on an alkaline earth-deficient sample (Ca<sub>1-y</sub>Sr<sub>y</sub>)<sub>1-x</sub>CuO<sub>2-z</sub> with a transition temperature of 110 K characterized by defect layers of alkaline earth vacancies almost randomly inserted into the parent structure.</p><p>With an already high Ba content the non-superconducting compound Ba<sub>0</sub>.<sub>5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> has been observed by Sakurai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref34">34</xref>] formed at 1473 K under a high pressure of 6 GPa for 2 h. This phase is orthorhombic with lattice parameters a = 3.92 &#197;, b = 3.94 &#197; and c = 2·3.965 &#197;, space group Pmmm. The doubling of the c parameter is attributed to the ordering of the alkaline earth ions Ba and Sr in separate sheets parallel to (001), but the wide FWHM of the reflections may be due to non-uniform ordering. Furthermore, a superstructure in the a-b plane was found. The reported lattice parameters were discussed in chapter A1 in more details.</p><p>Further investigations performed by Adachi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref44">44</xref>] reported the formation of some stoichiometric infinite-layer compositions under high pressure and their decomposition with increasing, but nevertheless small uptake of oxygen beyond two in the formula unit.</p><p>Another synthesis route was successfully carried out to prepare infinite-layer phases by depositing epitaxial thin films on (001)-oriented SrTiO<sub>3</sub> single crystal substrates at about 843 K (Sugii et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref45">45</xref>] ; Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref46">46</xref>] ; Terashima et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref47">47</xref>] ).</p><p>Finally, Maeda et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref48">48</xref>] reported the two-dimensional laser beam epitaxy of infinite-layer BaCuO<sub>2</sub> with a strain-expanded lattice parameter of c = 4.08 &#197;, whereas the a parameter was found difficult to determine due to the air-sensitivity of the surface. A mean value around 3.90 &#197; may be derived from the unit-cell volume.</p><p>On a properly chosen substrate the crystal lattice of the thin film is put under considerable compressive strain imitating high pressure conditions, but the compression in the plane of the film causes an expansion perpendicular to it. Therefore, since the lattice parameters of thin films may be altered in comparison with those of the bulk material the reported values have to be treated with some caution.</p><p>Recently, first principle calculations were applied to unravel the electronic structure of SrCuO<sub>2</sub> with both the simple parent structure and the high-pressure superstructure, existing in the space group <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-4800304x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as a subgroup of P4/mmm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref49">49</xref>] .</p><p>The complex crystal structure of cubic BaCuO<sub>2</sub>, the second prototype considered, was solved by Kipka &amp; M&#252;ller-Buschbaum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref50">50</xref>] . Distinct copper-oxygen clusters were found in the unit cell with space group Im3m. The largest cluster is a 26-hedron with 24 vertices and 48 edges, occupied by one of the soft Ba<sup>2+</sup> with a surrounding of 24 oxygen atoms, and composed of 18 quadrilaterals and 8 triangles. It represents a combination of a cube, a rhombic dodecahedron and an octahedron. Thus the polyhedron notation is written as [4<sup>6</sup>4<sup>12</sup>3<sup>8</sup>] or simply as [4<sup>18</sup>3<sup>8</sup>]. The quadrilaterals are centred by Cu<sup>2+</sup>. This large sphere cluster of Cu<sub>18</sub>O<sub>24</sub> composition is located at 0, 0, 0 and 1/2, 1/2, 1/2. In addition, 8-ring clusters of composition Cu<sub>6</sub>O<sub>12</sub> are suggested to be at the position 1/4, 1/4, 1/4 of the unit cell, apart from further 6 lone CuO<sub>4</sub> units to complete the unit cell content to Z = 90. It then remains to explain why in the description of the crystal structure such large number of general sets and special ones of equivalent positions add up to the simple BaCuO<sub>2</sub> stoichiometry, even though one site for Cu and oxygen show only partial occupation. Weller and Lines [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref51">51</xref>] have demonstrated that by thermal treatment at 1073 K in air or pure oxygen atmosphere the oxygen site in question may be slightly filled up from 0.25 to 0.379 atoms, leading to the formula BaCuO<sub>2.07</sub>, whereas stoichiometric material can be prepared under vacuum at 673 K.</p><p>From an unreasonably high displacement factor for the Ba atom on the origin the authors concluded that an unoccupied site exists, giving at least the formulas Ba<sub>0.98</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> and Ba<sub>0.98</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub>.<sub>07</sub>, respectively. Indeed, on the one hand the very long bonds of 3.926 &#197; between the 24 oxygen atoms and Ba in the central position would contribute just 28.2% of the required bond strength of +2. On the other hand, the conclusion drawn from the displacement factor does not indicate evidence for an empty position. It is rather assumed that this Ba atom occupies an off-centre position and shows a rapid agitation between the distinct symmetry-allowed sites. The cluster cage is too large even for the soft Ba<sup>2+</sup> ion.</p><p>Soon thereafter, Insausti et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref52">52</xref>] reported the preparation of the Ba<sub>1-x</sub>Sr<sub>x</sub>CuO<sub>2+δ</sub> solid solution by thermal decomposition of metallo-organic complexes and investigated its magnetic and spectroscopic properties. The presence of Sr modifies the magnetic properties and reduces the ferromagnetic interaction. The substitution of Sr for Ba could be demonstrated up to x = 0.4, but the lattice parameter reduces only slightly from 18.272(1) &#197; (x = 0) to 18.181(1) &#197; (x = 0.4). This behaviour may be attributed to the stiffness of the large cuprate clusters and their connection through lone cuprate units along the main crystal axes without any bonding contribution of the alkaline earth ions in these directions.</p><p>Turning again to physical properties, Wang et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58600-ref53">53</xref>] revealed the magnetic structure of BaCuO<sub>2+x</sub> by magnetization and neutron diffraction measurements. The individual clusters order ferromagnetically. Among the ring clusters an AF order was observed below 15 K, whereas among the spherical clusters paramagnetic order remains down to 2 K.</p><p>In summary, with respect to the alkaline earth content the parent structure exists up to the limiting concentration range of Ba<sub>0.5</sub>Sr<sub>0.5</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> under high pressure condition, and further up to pure BaCuO<sub>2</sub>, but only in highly strained thin films, whereas the BaCuO<sub>2</sub> prototypic structure exists down to Ba<sub>0.6</sub>Sr<sub>0.4</sub>CuO<sub>2</sub> under ambient pressure condition.</p><p>In this appended chapter a large part of published work about the parent structure and BaCuO<sub>2</sub> has put together in order to develop the new idea of the possible formation of large antiferromagnetic cuprate cages respective cupric oxide ones.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58600-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bednorz, J.G. and Müller, K.A. (1986) Possible High Tc Superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O System. Zeitschrift für Physik, B64,189-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01303701</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Müller-Buschbaum, H. (1989) Zur Kristallchemie der oxidischen Hochtemperatur-Supraleiter und deren kristallchemischen Verwandten. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 101, 1503-1524. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ange.19891011105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yvon, K. and Fran&amp;#231;ois, M. (1989) Crystal Structures of High-Tc Oxides. The Years 1987 and 1988. Zeitschrift für Physik, B76, 413-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01307892</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baltrusch, R. (1997) Zur Kristallchemie von Systemen oxidischer Hochtemperatursupraleiter. Dissertation, TU Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otto, H.H., Brandt, H.-J. and Meibohm, M. (1996) über die Existenz des Kupferpolysilicats Cu{uB&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;1&lt;sub&gt;∞&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup style="margin-left:-7px;"&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;}Cu{uB&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt;1&lt;sub&gt;∞&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;sup style="margin-left:-7px;"&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;} 
[&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;SiO&lt;sub&gt;3&lt;/sub&gt;]. Beihefte zu European Journal of Mineralogy, 8, 206.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otto, H.H. and Meibohm, M. (1999) Crystal Structure of Copper Polysilicate, Cu [SiO3]. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 214, 558-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1524/zkri.1999.214.9.558</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sigrist, T., Zahurak, S.M., Murphy, D.W. and Roth, R.S. (1988) The Parent Structure of the Layered High-Temperature Superconductors. Nature 334, 231-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/334231a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siemons, W. (2008) Nanoscale Properties of Complex Oxide Films. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jahn, H.A. and Teller, E. (1937) Stability of Polyatomic Molecules in Degenerate Electronic States. I. Orbital Degeneracy. Proceedings of the Royal Society, A161, 220-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1937.0142</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Woodley, S.M. and Catlow, R. (2008) Crystal Structure Predictions from First Principles. Nature Materials, 7, 907-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2321</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Forster, M.D., Simperler, A., Bell, R.G., Friedrich, O.D., Paz, F.A. and Klinowski, J. (2004) Chemically Feasible Hypothetical Crystalline Networks. Nature Materials, 3, 234-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat1090</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schein, S. and Gayed, J.M. (2014) Fourth Class of Convex Equilateral Polyhedron with Polyhedral Symmetry Related to Fullerenes and Viruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 2920-2925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310939111</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhai, H.-J., Zhao, Y.-F., Li, W.-L., Chen, Q., Bai, H., Hu, H.-S., Piazza, Z.A., Tian, W.-J., Lu, H.-G., Wu, Y.-B., Mu, Y.-W., Wie, G.-F., Liu, Z.-P., Li, J., Li, S.-D. and Wang, L.-S. (2014) Observation of an All-Boron Fullerene. Nature Chemistry, 6, 727-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1999</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, I.D. and Shannon, R.D. (1973) Empirical Bond-Strength—Bond-Length Curves for Oxides. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 29, 266-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0567739473000689</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, I.D. (1981) The Bond-Valence Method: An Empirical Approach to Chemical Structure and Bonding. Structure and Bonding in Crystals. Volume II, Academic Press, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, S., Norton, D.P., Chamberlain, J.E., Shahedipour, F. and White, H.W. (1996) Evidence of Apical Oxygen in Artificially Superconducting SrCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;-BaCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Thin Films: A Raman Characterization. Physical Review B, 54, 97-100. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.97</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sch&amp;#246;nberger, R., Otto, H.H., Brunner, B. and Renk, K.F. (1991) Evidence for Filamentary Superconductivity up to 220 K in Oriented Multiphase Y-Ba-Cu-O Thin Films. Physica C: Superconductivity, 173, 159-162. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(91)90363-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azzoni, C.B., Paravicini, G.B.A., Samoggia, G., Ferloni, P. and Parmigiani, F. (1990) Electrical Instability in CuO&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;: Possible Correlations with the CuO-Based High Temperature Superconductors. Zeitschriftfür Naturforschung, A45, 790-794.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osipov, V.V., Kochev, I.V. and Naumov, S.V. (20010) Giant Electric Conductivity at the CuO-Cu Interface: HTSL-Like Temperature Variations. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 93, 1082-1090.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mitkin</surname><given-names> A.V. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>Striped Organization of Hole Excitations and Oxygen Interstitials in Cuprates as a Route to Room-Temperature Superconductivity</article-title><source> Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magneti</source><volume> 25</volume>,<fpage> 1277</fpage>-<lpage>1281</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, L. and Bassett, W.A. (1972) Effect of Pressure on the Crystal Structure and Lattice Parameters of BaO. Journal of Geophysical Research, 77, 4934-4937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB077i026p04934</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimura, T, Goto, T., Shintani, H., Ishizaka, K., Arima, T. and Tokura, Y. (2003) Magnetic Control of Ferroelectric Polarization. Nature, 426, 55-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kimura, T., Sekio, Y., Nakamura, H., Siegrist, T. and Ramirez, A.P. (2008) Cupric Oxide as an Induced-Multiferroic with High-Tc. Nature Materials, 7, 291-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat2125</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramirez, A.P., Broholm, C.I., Cava, R.J. and Kowach, G.R. (2000) Geometrical Frustration, Spin Ice and Negative Thermal Expansion—The Physics of Under-Constraint. Physica B, 280, 290-295. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(99)01695-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Euler</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1752</year>)<article-title>Elementa doctrine solidorum</article-title><source> Novi commentarii academiae scientiarum imperialis petropolitanae</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 109</fpage>-<lpage>160</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otto, H.H. (1980) Manual for Turbo-Basic Crystal Structure Programs: Strufit, Guinkorr, Binwin, Bondval. Regensburg University, Regensburg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rocquefelte, X., Schwarz, K. and Blaha, P. (2012) Theoretical Investigation of the Magnetic Exchange Interaction in Copper(II) Oxides under Chemical and Physical Pressures. Scientific Reports, 2, Article No. 759.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep00759</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siemons, W., Koster, G., Blank, D.H.A., Hammond, R.H., Geballe, T.H. and Beasley, M.R. (2009) Tetragonal CuO: End Member of the 3d Transition Metal Monoxides. Physical Review B, 79, Article ID: 195122. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.195122</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Samal, D., Tan, H., Takamura, Y., Siemons, W., Verbeeck, J., Van Tendeloo, G., Arenholz, E., Jenkins, C.A., Rijnders, G. and Koster, G. (2014) Direct Structural and Spectroscopic Investigation of Ultrathin Films of Tetragonal CuO: Six-Fold Coordinated Copper. Europhysics Letters, 105, Article ID: 17003. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/105/17003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carvajal, J.R. (2004) Introduction to the Program FULLPROF. Laboratoire Leon Brillon (CEA-CNRS), Saclay France.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alloull, H. and Lyle, S. (2010) Introduction to the Physics of Electrons in Solids. E-Book, Springer Verlag, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moser, S. Moreschini, L. Yang, H.-Y., Innocenti, D., Fuchs, F., Hansen, N.H., Chang, Y.J., Kim, K.S., Walter, A.L., Bostwick, A., Rotenberg, E., Mila, F. and Grioni, M. (2014) Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy of Tetragonal CuO: Evidence for Intralayer Coupling between Cupratelike Sublattices. Physical Review Letters, 113, Article ID: 187001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.187001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takano, M., Takeda, Y., Okada, H., Miyamoto, M. and Kusaka, T. (1989) A CuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; (A: Alkaline Earth) Crystallizing in a Layered Structure. Physica C, 159, 375-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4534(89)80007-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakurai, T., Sugii, N., Takizawa, H., Ichikawa, M., Yaegashi, Y., Adachi, S., Shimada, M. and Yamauchi, H. (1992) Ba&lt;sub&gt;0.5&lt;/sub&gt;Sr&lt;sub&gt;0.5&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;: A New Perovskite Related Structure Which Forms at High Pressure. Physica C, 193, 471-475. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(92)90973-G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karpinsky, J., Schwer, H., Mangelshots, I., Conder, K., Morawski, A., Lade, T. and Paszewin, A. (1994) Single crystals of Hg&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;Pb&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;Ba&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;Ca&lt;sub&gt;n-1&lt;/sub&gt;Cu&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2n+1-δ&lt;/sub&gt; and Infinite-Layer CaCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Synthesis at Gas Pressure of 10 kbar, Properties and Structure. Physica C, 234, 10-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(94)90047-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takano, M., Azuma, M., Bando, Y. and Takeda, Y. (1991) Superconductivity in the Ba-Sr-Cu-O System. Physica C, 176, 441-444.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teske, C.L. and Müller-Buschbaum, H. (1970) über Erdalkalimetallcuprate. V. Zur Kenntnis von Ca2CuO3 und SrCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 379, 234.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, M.G., Manthiram, A., Zhou, J., Goodenough, J.B. and Markert, J.T. (1991) Electron-Doped Superconductivity at 40 K in the Infinite-Layer Compound Sr&lt;sub&gt;1-y&lt;/sub&gt;Nd&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Nature, 351, 549-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/351549a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Er, G., Miyamoto, Y., Kanamaru, F. and Kikkawa, S. (1991) Superconductivity in the Infinite-Layer Compound Sr&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;La&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Physica C, 181, 206-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(91)90356-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hiroi, Z., Azuma, M., Takano, M. and Bando, Y. (1991) A New Family of Copper Oxide Superconductors Sr&lt;sub&gt;n+2&lt;/sub&gt;Cu&lt;sub&gt;n&lt;/sub&gt;O&lt;sub&gt;2n+1+δ&lt;/sub&gt; Stabilized at High Pressure. Physica C, 188-189, 523-524. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(91)92064-I</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azuma, M., Hiroi, Z., Takano, M., Bando, Y. and Takeda, Y. (1992) Superconductivity at 110 K in the Infinite-Layer Compound (Sr&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;Ca&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;)&lt;sub&gt;1-y&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;. Nature, 356, 775-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/356775a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hiroi, Z., Azuma, M., Takano, M. and Takeda, Y. (1993) Structure and Superconductivity in the Infinite-Layer Compound (Ca&lt;sub&gt;1-y&lt;/sub&gt;Sr&lt;sub&gt;y&lt;/sub&gt;)&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2-z&lt;/sub&gt;. Physica C, 208, 286-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(93)90200-A</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adachi, S., Yamauchi, H., Tanaka, S. and Mori, N. (1993) High-Pressure Synthesis of Superconducting Sr-Ca-Cu-O Samples. Physica C, 208, 226-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(93)90192-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adachi, S., Yamauchi, H., Tanaka, S. and Mori, N. (1993) New Superconducting Cuprates in the Sr-Ca-Cu-O System. Physica C, 212, 164-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(93)90498-F</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sugii, N., Ichikawa, M., Hayachi, K., Kubo, K., Yamamoto, K. and Yamauchi, H. (1993) Microstructure of the Infinite-Layer Structural Sr&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2-d&lt;/sub&gt; Thin Films. Physica C, 213, 345-352. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(93)90451-U</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X., Kanai, M., Kawai, T. and Kawai, S. (1993) Epixial Growth and Properties of Ca&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;Sr&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Thin Films (x = 0.18 to 1.0) Prepared by Co-Deposition and Atomic Layer Stacking. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 31, L217-L220. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.31.L217</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terashima, Y., Sato, R., Takeno, S., Nakamura, S. and Miura, T. (1993) Preparation of Epitaxial SrCuO&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt; Thin Films with an Infinite-Layer Structure. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 32, L48-L50. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.32.L48</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maeda, T., Yoshimoto, M., Shimozono, K. and Koinuma, H. (1995) Two-Dimensional Laser Molecular Beam Epitaxy and Carrier Modulation of Infinite-Layer BaCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; Films. Superconductivity, 247, 142-146. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-4534(95)00067-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Rak, Z., Zhang, F., Ewing, R.C. and Becker, U. (2011) Electronic Structure and Energetics of Tetragonal SrCuO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and Its High-Pressure Superstructure Phase. Jounal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 23, Article ID: 465503.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kipka, R. and Müller-Buschbaum, H. (1977) über Oxocuprate. XX Ein Erdalkalimetallcuprat (II) mit geschlossenen Baueinheiten. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 32, 121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weller, M.T. and Lines, D.R. (1989) Structure and Oxidation State Relationship in Ternary Copper Oxides. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 82, 21-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(89)90217-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Insausti, M., Lezama, L., Cortés, R., Gil de Muro, I., Rojo, T. and Arriortua, M.I. (1995) Evolution with Time of the Magnetic and Spectroscopic Properties of the BaCuO&lt;sub&gt;2+δ&lt;/sub&gt; Phase. Study of Ba&lt;sub&gt;1-x&lt;/sub&gt;Sr&lt;sub&gt;x&lt;/sub&gt;CuO&lt;sub&gt;2+δ&lt;/sub&gt; Solid Solution. Solid State Communications, 93, 823-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(94)00876-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58600-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, Z.-R., Wang, X.-L., Fernandez-Baca, J.A., Johnston, G.C. and Vaknin, D. (1994) Antiferromagnetic Ordering and Paramagnetic Behaviour of Ferromagnetic Cu6 and Cu18 Clusters in BaCuO2+x. Science, 264, 202-204. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5157.402</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>