<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2015.36083</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-57625</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Painlev&#233; Property and Exact Solutions to a (2 + 1) Dimensional KdV-mKdV Equation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>uqing</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Duan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chao</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Physics &amp;amp; Mathematics, Changzhou University, Changzhou, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>School of Business Administration, Shanghai Lixin University of Commerce, Shanghai, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yqmail321@163.com(UL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>06</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>697</fpage><lpage>706</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>12</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>27</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A (2 + 1) dimensional KdV-mKdV equation is proposed and integrability in the sense of Painlev&#233; and some exact solutions are discussed. The B&#228;cklund transformation and bilinear equations are obtained through Painlev&#233; analysis. Some exact solutions are deduced by Hirota method and generalized Wronskian method.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>(2+1) Dimensional KdV-mKdV Equation</kwd><kwd> Painlev&#233; Property</kwd><kwd> B&#228;cklund Transformation</kwd><kwd> Bilinear Equation</kwd><kwd> Wronskian Method</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recently high dimensional nonlinear partial differential or difference equations attract much interest. Both inte- grable and non-integrable equations have their physical and mathematical values but the former posses some special properties such as infinite conservation laws and symmetries, multi-soliton solutions, B&#228;cklund and Darboux transformation (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref1">1</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref3">3</xref>] ). Among these high dimensional equations some are deduced from physics phenomenon originally, say KP equation, but others are deduced firstly from (1 + 1) dimensional equation mathematically ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref4">4</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref8">8</xref>] ). However, the findings of new solutions or special constructions of these equations makes nonlinearity of equations be realized clearly, which helps the development of subject of nonlinear science. In this paper we will consider a (2 + 1) dimensional KdV-mKdV equation as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2090"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where subscript means a partial derivative such as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is obvious</p><p>that if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> the equation becomes a mixed KdV-mKdV equation, which is widely researched by many authors (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref10">10</xref>] ). The related negative KdV equation and (2 + 1)-dimensional KdV equation were also discussed by several authors (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref11">11</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref14">14</xref>] ). Now we set</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2091"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>to treat the integral appearing in equation. The Equation (1) is then rewritten as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2092"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We will prove it has Painlev&#233; property firstly, then deduce a B&#228;cklund transformation and bilinear equation. Using bilinear equation we can construct Wronskian solutions and present some exact solutions finally.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Painlev&#233; Test</title><p>Painlev&#233; analysis method is an important method for testing integrability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref15">15</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref19">19</xref>] . As we know, the basic Painlev&#233; test consists of the following steps (taking (1 + 1) dimensional case as an example) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>Step 1. Expanding the solution of a PDE as Laurent series of a singular manifold</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2093"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is constant to be determined and coefficients <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Then substitute it into PDE to find all dominant balances.</p><p>Step 2. If all exponents <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are integers, find the resonances where arbitrary constants can appear.</p><p>Step 3. If all resonances are integers, check the resonance conditions in each Laurent expansion.</p><p>Conclusion. If no obstruction is found in Steps 1 - 3 for every dominant balances, then the Painlev&#233; test is satisfied.</p><p>The situation of high dimensional case is similar. For step 1, we can simply let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2094"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting them into (2, 3) gives us</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2095"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Thus</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2096"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Insert them into (2, 3) and equal coefficients of both side of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (3), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>in (2) we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2097"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2098"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From them we work out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2099"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To get resonances we collect the coefficient of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (3), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>in (2) for general term number r respec- tively, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2100"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2101"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where F, G are functions of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and their derivatives. This gives the resonances <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> means the singular manifold <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Now we proceed to verify the resonance conditions. First we consider <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> For this purpose we extract <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (3) and set it be zero. We readily have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2102"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or equivalently</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2103"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The part of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (2) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2104"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and it is true by employing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> obtained above. This result shows that an arbitrary appears in reso- nance<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e. resonance condition is satisfied. Further, we verify resonance condition for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Collecting the terms of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (3) reads</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2105"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2106"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In a similar way, collecting the terms of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (2) makes us have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2107"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2108"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we need to verify</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2109"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>because <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a resonance, i.e. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>By inserting (13) into and through a dull calculation</p><p>we can complete the proof of compatible condition. It is a turn to consider <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which emerge from <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (3) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (2). They are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2110"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2111"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2112"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2113"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Its resonance condition is verified similarly but is more complex. Thus we prove that (2 + 1) dimensional KdV-mKdV equation passes Painlev&#233; test.</p><p>Now we consider to truncate the series (6). To meet this end we must let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Thus we will have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2114"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and combine the equation satisfied by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we obtain a B&#228;cklund transformation actually. In fact, if we take <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> then (13) gives</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2115"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Furthermore, If we continue to set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get following relations from (15, 16)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2116"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2117"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> produces another identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2118"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (20)-(23) we may truncate the series. Thus we indeed get a B&#228;cklund transformation by noting (22, 23). But it is more important pointing that the identities (20)-(23) have only two independent expressions, say (22, 23). Applying the definition of Schwartzian derivative</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2119"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we simplify them as a concise form, i.e. so called Schwartzian derivative equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2120"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is the condition satisfied by function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in B&#228;cklund transformation (19).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Hirota Method for Finding Exact Solutions</title><p>In this section we will give the bilinear equation of Equation (1) and present some exact solutions from it. The truncation form (19) suggests us to try the transformation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2121"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We first take an integral with respect to x on Equation (1). Then eliminate the remaining integral operator by setting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2122"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where D is bilinear operator. Thus we can transfer Equation (1) into</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2123"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equations (26, 27) are bilinear equations of (1). To find its solutions we set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> further, where <sup>*</sup> means complex conjugation. Expanding f as perturbation series</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2124"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and substituting it into bilinear equations, equaling coefficients of power of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2125"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2126"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Take</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2127"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are all real constants (the similar condition will be imposed on later text but omitting), we know the relation immediately</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2128"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The coefficient of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can take as zero according to this result. So we get a single solution solution as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2129"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If we take</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2130"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then after substituting it into (29, 30) we know relations</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2131"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x86.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are valid. Again compare coefficient of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2132"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2133"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When employing (34),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2134"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>are obtained. After that we consider coefficient of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2135"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2136"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The r.h.s is computed to zero. Thus we may truncate the perturbation series and 2-soliton solution is got as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2137"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Further, keeping these results in mind we can conjecture the N-soliton solution taking on</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2138"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x95.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x97.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Wronskian Solutions</title><p>Wronskian technique is one of the powerful methods in finding exact solutions of nonlinear integrable evolution equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref21">21</xref>] . It can be used to solve whole integrable evolution equation hierarchy (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref23">23</xref>] ) and its application had been extended to negative nonlinear evolution equation (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref24">24</xref>] ), high dimensional nonlinear evolution equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref25">25</xref>] , etc. The generalization of this method can obtain several types of exact solutions (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref27">27</xref>] ). Here we use the Nimmo's brief notation to denote Wronskia determinants:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2139"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2140"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2141"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2142"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x101.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2143"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Supposing that vectors <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfies the following conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2144"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x105.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A is a non-singular real constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> matrix. We will prove that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the solution of bilinear Equations (26) and (27). We first point out that in this situation, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>can be expressed by related Wronskia determinant:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2145"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To get down to our work we need the help of two Lemmas, we list out them first.</p><p>Lemma 1 ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref27">27</xref>] ) Assuming that M is a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> matrix and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are n-dimensional vectors, then the following determinantal identity is valid:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2146"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Lemma 2 ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref24">24</xref>] ) Assuming P is a <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> matrix, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the columns of another <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> matrix, then we have the following foluma</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2147"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We first treat bilinear Equations (26). Computing derivatives of Wronskians <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and substituting them into (26) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2148"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When apply Lemma 2 into Wronskians <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get an identity as follows</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2149"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then adding it to (44) gives us</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2150"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which equals zero by using Lemma 1. Now we can focus our attention on the bilinear Equation (27). We also calculate the derivative of Wronskians <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> prior to carrying out our procedure. For example, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2151"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> becomes as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2152"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Again using Lemma 2, we produce two identities as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2153"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2154"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The substitution of (48, 49) into (47) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2155"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To vanish r.h.s of this equation we apply Lemma 1 again, which give us a valuable identity</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2156"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Multiply <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to this identity we work out another relation as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2157"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is because of</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2158"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In a same way, we deduce</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2159"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus we complete the proof that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Now we present some exact solutions as examples. Firstly, we may write out the expression of spectral vector<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2160"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x136.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are two real constant vectors and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2161"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where I is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> unit matrix. If we choose A as diagonal matrix then soliton solutions of equation (1) can be got again. In fact, supposing</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2162"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x140.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2163"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x141.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then spectral vector <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> adopts the following formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2164"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x143.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2165"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The solutions given by (25) are solitons solutions in this situation. In fact, when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, it is exactly the solution (33). When consider<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x145.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we compute out</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2166"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x147.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This gives the same solution as (41) or simplified form:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2167"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x148.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is a two-soliton solution. We can also take into account other solutions. For instance, let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2168"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x149.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then we find <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x150.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in this situation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2169"><label>(54)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x151.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2170"><label>(55)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x152.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x153.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the spectral vector is got then:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2171"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x154.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The correspondent solution of Equation (1) is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2172"><label>(56)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x155.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or simplified form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57625-formula2173"><label>(57)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-1720303x156.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This is known as a complexiton solution (c.f. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57625-ref26">26</xref>] ).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Utilizing Painlev&#233; test we prove the integrability of a (2 + 1) dimensional KdV-mKdV equation in the sense of Painlev&#233;. And in the mean time a B&#228;cklund transformation is produced. Through bilinear equation we get several exact solutions by Hirota method and generalized Wronskian method. Some explicit formulas of exact solutions are obtained. Particularly, 2-soliton solution and complexiton solutions are presented as examples.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to editors and referees for their very careful works. In the mean time, the authors thank to the referees for giving helpful advices.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Support</title><p>This work is partly supported by Chinese National Social Science Foundation (Grant Number: CNSSF: 13CJY037) Research on the indemnificatory Apartment Construction Based on Residential Integration.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.57625-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ablowitz, M.J. and Clarkson, P.A. (1991) Solitons, Nonlinear Evolution Equations and Inverse Scattering. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 149, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511623998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ablowitz, M.J., Biondini, G. and Prinari, B. (2007) Inverse Scattering Transform for the Integrable Discrete Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation with Nonvanishing Boundary Conditions. Inverse Problems, 23, 1711-1758.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/23/4/021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nimmoa, J.J.C. and Yilmaz, H. (2014) On Darboux Transformations for the Derivative Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 21, 278-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14029251.2014.905301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kakei, S., Ikeda, T. and Takasaki, K. (2002) Hierarchy of (2+1)-Dimensional Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equation, Self-Dual Yang-Mills Equation and Toroidal Lie Algebras. Annales Henri Poincaré, 3, 817-845.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-002-8638-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Yan, Z. and Zhang, H. (2003) New Explicit Solitary Wave Solutions for (2 + 1)-Dimensional Boussinesq Equation and (3 + 1)-Dimensional KP Equation. Physics Letters A, 307, 107-113.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01668-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toda, K. and Kobayashi, T. (2005) Integrable Nonlinear Partial Diferential Equations with Variable Coefficients from the Painlevé Test. Proceedings of 10th International Conference in Modern Group Analysis, 214-221.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., Song, Y. and Cheng, L. (2012) Exact Solutions and Painlevé Analysis of a New (2 + 1)-Dimensional Generalized KdV Equation. Nonlinear Dynamics, 68, 445-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0228-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wazwaz, A.M. (2005) Variants of the Two-Dimensional Boussinesq Equation with Compactons, Solitons, and Periodic Solutions. Computers &amp; Mathematics with Applications, 49, 295-301.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2004.06.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radha, R. and Lakshmanan, M. (1995) Dromion like Structures in the (2+1)-Dimensional Breaking Soliton Equation. Physics Letters A, 197, 7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(94)00926-G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lou, S.Y. (1996) On the Dromion Solutions of a (2 + 1)-Dimensional KdV-Type Equation. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 26, 487-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/26/4/487</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qiao, Z.J. and Fan, E.G. (2012) Negative-Order Korteweg-De Vries Equations. Physical Review E, 86, Article ID: 016601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.016601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lou, S.Y. and Ruan, H.Y. (2001) Revisitation of the Localized Excitations of the (2+1)-Dimensional KdV Equation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34, 305-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/2/307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hu, W.P., Deng, Z.C., Qin, Y.Y. and Zang, W.L. (2012) Multi-Symplectic Method for the Generalized (2+1)-Dimensional KdV-mKdV Equation. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 28, 793-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10409-012-0070-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, H., Fu, Z.T. and Liu, S.K. (2013) Exact Coherent Structures in the (2+1)-Dimensional KdV Equations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 3102-3111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.07.038</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiss, J., Tabor, M. and Carnevale, G. (1983) The Painleve&amp;#233; Property for Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 24, 522-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.525721</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weiss, J. (1983) The Painleve&amp;#233; Property for Partial Differential Equations. II: Ba&amp;#228;cklund Transformation, Lax Pairs, and the Schwarzian Derivative. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 24, 1405-1413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.525875</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Joshi, N. (1987) Painlevé Property of General Variable-Coefficient Versions of the Korteweg de Vries and Nonlinear Schr&amp;#246;dinger Equations. Physics Letters A, 125, 456-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(87)90184-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohammad, A.A. and Can, M. (1996) Painleve Analysis and Symmetries of the Hirota–Satsuma Equation. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 3, 152-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.1996.3.1-2.15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baldwin, D. and Hereman, W. (2006) Symbolic Software for the Painlevé Test of Nonlinear Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations. Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 13, 90-110. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.2006.13.1.8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nimmo, J.J.C. (1983) Soliton solution of Three Differential-Difference Equations in Wronskian Form. Physics Letters A, 99, 281-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(83)90885-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freeman, N.C. and Nimmo, J.J.C. (1983) Soliton Solutions of the KdV and KP Equations: The Wronskian Technique. Physics Letters A, 95, 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(83)90764-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Q.M. (1990) Double Wronskian Solution of the AKNS and the Classical Boussinesq Hierarchies. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 59, 3520-3527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.59.3520</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Y.Q., Chen, D.Y. and Hu, C. (2011) The Generalized Wronskian Solutions of a Inverse KdV Hierarchy. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218, 2025-2035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2011.07.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Y.Q., Chen, D.Y. and Hu, C. (2012) The Generalized Wronskian Solution to a Negative KdV-mKdV Equation. Chinese Physics Letters, 29, Article ID: 080202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/29/8/080202</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, Y.Q., Chen, D.Y. and zhang, D.J. (2008) Multisoliton Solutions to a Nonisospectral (2+1)-Dimensional Breaking Soliton Equation. Physics Letters A, 372, 2017-2025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.096</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, W.X. (2002) Complexiton Solutions to the Korteweg-De Vries Equation. Physics Letters A, 301, 35-44. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00971-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57625-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, D.Y., Zhang, D.J. and Bi, J.B. (2008) New Double Wronskian Solutions of the AKNS Equation. Science in China Series A: Mathematics, 51, 55-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11425-007-0165-6</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>