<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2015.62028</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-54048</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Comparison of Some Physicochemical Properties of Locust Bean Seeds Gum Extracted by Acid and Water Pre-Treatments
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>eslihan</surname><given-names>Eda Kıvrak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Buket</surname><given-names>Aşkın</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Erdoğan</surname><given-names>Küçüköner</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Food Engineering, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Food Engineering, Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>erdogankucukoner@sdu.edu.tr(EK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>02</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>278</fpage><lpage>286</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>10</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this research, locust bean gums were removed from seeds with different extraction methods and some physicochemical properties were analyzed for gums and also locust beans. Three different extractions were treated at different temperatures and durations of sulfuric acid (H
  <sub>2</sub>SO
  <sub>4</sub>, 60%) solution, hydrochloric acid (HCl, 30%) solution and boiling water. Following dehulling and drying processes, seeds were milled and locust bean gums (LBG) were obtained eventually. The color values, moisture, protein, ash, sugar, pH, total acidity, soluble solids content, foreign particulates, acid insoluble ash contents and viscosity curves were compared for all samples. The results exhibited that the highest ash (1.94%) and protein (6.65%) contents were determined by water extraction gum, the highest acid-insoluble ash (3.58%) and foreign particulates (44.17%) contents were determined by HCl extraction gum. The lowest protein (5.01%), acid insoluble ash (1.29%), the foreign particulates (34.99%) and the highest viscosity value (533.9 mPas) were found from H
  <sub>2</sub>SO
  <sub>4</sub> extraction gum. The results of investigation also showed that the H
  <sub>2</sub>SO
  <sub>4</sub> extraction method was found to be more appropriate than HCl and water extraction methods to obtain a good quality gum.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Extraction Methods</kwd><kwd> Gum</kwd><kwd> Locust Bean</kwd><kwd> Physicochemical Properties</kwd><kwd> Viscosity</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The locust bean gum (LBG) has obtained by crushing the endosperm of seeds from fruit pod of the carob tree (Cerationia siliqua L.) grown in Mediterranean regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] . The locust bean gum plays an important role in the rheological properties of food products if it can be obtained in pre form [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref2">2</xref>] . LBG is an effective way to use as a stabilizer, thickener, gelling agent and fat replacer for different food products due to its natural image, the neutral taste and the viscosity and also it provides which is a white or creamish white, odorless powder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref3">3</xref>] . Furthermore, LBG has a positive impact on the protein stability, crystal structure of ice cream and it has reducing effect for syneresis in fruit and dairy applications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>The seed has three main constituents: husk (30% - 33%), endosperm (42% - 46%) and germ (23% - 25%) and also they are covered with a tight-fitting brown coat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref6">6</xref>] . LBG is obtained from endosperm and so the first stage of the gum extraction involves removal of the seed hull. For the gum extraction, these coats can be removed by the different thermo-mechanical or chemical treatments. The seeds are split lengthwise and the endosperm is separated from the germ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] . After the isolation process, endosperms are grounded and sifted for obtain to the locust bean gum (LBG) or carob gum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref8">8</xref>] . Different acids, alcohols and water can be used for extraction process and each one has different challenges and advantages for gum quality and economical value. It is the most important point for the process must avoid changes on the chemical and physical properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>A high purity LBG generally contains moisture 10% - 13%, protein 5%, ash 1%, fiber 1% and galactomannan 80% - 85% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] . LBG has high-molecular-weight and describes chemically as galactomannan, depending on the chemical structures consisting of β-(1-4)-D-mannopyranosyl backbone and α-(1-6)-D-galactopyranosyl simple units are linked as a side chain [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref11">11</xref>] . LBG typically has a mannose to galactose (M/G) approximately ratio of about 4 which among to the major commercially available galactomannans, furthermore carob galoctomannan has the lowest galactose content with about 20% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref12">12</xref>] . The different galactomannans can be distinguished by their mannose-to-galactose ratio and their molecular weight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref12">12</xref>] . The molecular size and the structural properties affect to the solubility and also check to the rheological properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>The aim of this study was to extract locust bean gum with three different methods from the carob seeds and to compare these extracts.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Reagent and Materials</title><p>Locust bean is a species of flowering evergreen shrub or tree in the pea family, Fabaceae. It is widely cultivated for its edible pods, and as an ornamental tree in gardens. Locust bean fruits were used to obtain LBGs in this research belongs to Isparta region and they were purchased from a company selling dried nuts and fruits. This carob fruits were cut with scissors for obtain to the carob seeds. The physical properties were measured and the length and thickness were determined ranging between 6.0 and 10.8 mm and 2.0 and 4.9 mm, respectively.</p><p>Three different methods preferred to extraction of the carob seeds, with acid and water. All reagents used for liquid chromatography were of HPLC grade and obtained from Merck (Darmstad, Germany). All other reagents were of analytical grade and obtained from Merck (Darmstad, Germany).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Extraction Methods</title><p>Sulfuric acid extraction (LBG1): Whole carob seeds (100 g) were kept in 120 ml of 60%, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (Merck, K38346531) solution at 65˚C for 2 h. Seeds were deported from the solution, the coat was removed by washing and rubbing operation in water and on the metallic sieve. The uncoated seeds were dried at 100˚C for 30 min and crushed (10 seeds dehusked/3s) with a laboratory mill to separate the two endosperms and the germ. The endosperms were grinded (IKA A11 basic, Germany) and sifted (0.125 mm) to obtain LBG flour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] . The sulfuric acid extraction procedure was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>Hydrochloric acid extraction (LBG2): Whole carob seeds (100 g) were kept in 400 ml of 30%, HCl (Merck, K36508317) solution at 75˚C for 1 h. Seeds were removed from the solution, the coat was removed by washing and rubbing operation in water and on the metallic sieve. The uncoated seeds were kept in 700 ml water for 24 h at ambient temperature. At the end of this time, water was filtered and endosperms were separated manually from the germ. The endosperms were dried at 30˚C for 24 h and were grinded (IKA A11 basic, Germany) and sifted (0.125 mm) to obtain LBG flour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref14">14</xref>] . The hydrochloric acid extraction procedure was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The sulfuric acid extraction procedure.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x8.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig1_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x10.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>Water extraction (LBG3): Whole carob seeds (100 g) were kept in 800 ml of boiling water at 100˚C for 1 h. Seeds were removed from the water, washed and the tegument broken and divided by hand into the coat, endosperm and germ. Then the germ was separated from the endosperms which were dried at 100˚C for 1 h. The endosperms were grinded (IKA A11 basic, Germany) and sifted (0.125 mm) to obtain LBG flour [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref15">15</xref>] . The water extraction procedure was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Physicochemical Analysis</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Physical Analysis</title><p>The color values were measured on LBG samples. L, a, b color values of the samples were measured using a colorimeter (Konica Minolta CR 400, Japan). The L value represents the lightness, a value indicates red and green colors and b value indicates yellow and blue colors. Chroma (C) representing the color intensity and h˚ for the hue angle were calculated by the using a and b values the following equations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54048-formula1147"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54048-formula1148"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. Chemical Analysis</title><p>The moisture content of the carob gums was determined after drying the samples in an oven at 105˚C until constant weight (Mettler Toledo, AB204, Sweden). The ash content of the carob gums (4 g) were determined by burning the samples at 550˚C for 12h (N&#252;ve MF, 106).</p><p>The protein contents of the gums were estimated using the Kjeldahl assay and were converted to protein content using the conversion factor 6.25 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref17">17</xref>] . The total sugar contents of the seeds and gums were determined as a</p><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> The hydrochloric acid extraction procedure.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x14.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x15.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x16.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x17.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>spectroscopically. Samples (0.1 g) were kept in 100 ml of boiling water at 95˚C for 3 h. The solution containing the samples was filtered from the coarse filter paper and volume was completed to 100 ml. And then 1 ml sample solution was mixed with 2 ml anthron reagent (0.2 g anthron suspended in 100 ml 96%, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) and heated for 15 min at 95˚C in a boiling water bath. After cooling and centrifuging, sugar content was determined at 540 nm (&#181;g/g) (T70 + UV/VIS Spectrometer, PG Instruments Ltd., England) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.2.3. Gum Solution Analysis</title><p>The pH value of the gums was measured with the pH meter (Hana, HI 221 pH Meter, USA Gum solutions (1%, w/v)) were prepared in distilled water at ambient temperature. The total acidity of the gums was determined by titrimetric method. Gum solutions (1%, w/v) were prepared in distilled water at ambient temperature and the titrant was 0.01 mol∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> NaOH solution. The soluble solids of the gums were determined with ABBE refractometer (Bellingham-Stanley, 60/70 Abbe Refractometer, England). Gum solutions (1%, w/v) were prepared in distilled water at ambient temperature.</p><p>The acid-insoluble ash of the gums was determined from previously obtained ashes. On the crucibles containing the ash, 10 ml of 10% HCl solution was added and heated for 15 min at 95˚C in a boiling water bath. Crucible content was filtered from ash-free filter paper and filter paper washed with hot water chloride ions until there is no in the permeate. The presence of chloride ions were checked with silver nitrate solution (17 g/L, Fluka, 85228). Filter papers were ignited for 30 min at 625˚C. After cooling and weighting in precision balance, acid-insoluble ash content was determined as % by weigh [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>The particulates were determined as percent value by dry weigh. Gum solutions (1%, w/v) were prepared in distilled water at ambient temperature and mixed with mixer at high speed for 2 min. They were heated at 70˚C in a boiling water bath for 1 h while being stirred at low speed. After cooling and centrifugation at 6000 g for 30 min, the supernatant was decanted. Samples were oven dried overnight at 105˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> The water extraction procedure.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x18.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x19.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x20.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x21.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_5"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x22.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>The viscosity was determined by the viscometer (Brookfield DV-II Pro Viscometer, England). Gum solutions (1%, w/v) were prepared by adding 600 ml 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, at 75˚C, using a high speed mixer for 2 min. The samples were left overnight at ambient temperature to hydrate. They were briefly stirred with a magnetic stirrer to ensure homogeneity prior to measurement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref20">20</xref>] . Viscosity of samples was mea- sured using the LV-4 bit at 100 rpm, at 25˚C, at intervals 30 seconds for 3 minutes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref14">14</xref>] . Graph of time-viscosity was plotted with the viscosity values.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The findings of the analysis, the SPSS 17 statistical software package using the 0.05 significance level according to Duncan-ANOVA multiple comparison test evaluated the border. During the analysis, descriptive statistics such as the average, maximum value, minimum value, standard deviation, standard error were determined. Differences between groups were identified at the 0.05 significance level.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussions</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Physical Analysis</title><p>In all extraction assays easily broke to the coat but there were differences for separating the germ and endos- perm. So, the coat was easily broken and separated easily with blender for 3 seconds in sulfuric acid extraction. In all extraction assays easily broke to the coat but there were differences for separating the germ and endos- perm. So, the coat was easily broken and separated easily with blender for 3 seconds in sulfuric acid extraction. The color values of carob seeds and gums obtained from different extraction methods are also shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>In determining the color of foods CIE-Lab system is used mostly. In this system L value represents brightness, a value represents green-red color and b value represents blue-yellow color [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref21">21</xref>] . In addition, this system L, a and b values of x and y axes are shown, using these values the color angle (hue) are calculated around the x and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> The color values for L, a, b and calculated properties of carob seeds and gums</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >L</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >a</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >b</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Hue (h˚)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Croma (C)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.27<sup>a</sup> &#177; 4.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.09<sup>a</sup> &#177; 1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88.73<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.09<sup>a</sup> &#177; 1.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.55<sup>b</sup> &#177; 4.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.60<sup>b</sup> &#177; 1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.96<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.67<sup>b</sup> &#177; 1.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.61<sup>a</sup> &#177; 2.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.44<sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.52<sup>ab</sup> &#177; 1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.35<sup>c</sup> &#177; 2.40<sup> </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.53<sup>ab</sup> &#177; 1.09</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05).</p><p>y axis 360˚ angle is expressed. The angle values are positioned 0˚ red, 90˚ yellow, 180˚ blue and 270˚ green [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>As seen in the results, the L values were available statistically significant difference between LBG1 - LBG3 and LBG2 (p &lt; 0.05). The L values of gums were lower than the seeds. The reason is that, colors of the gums were lighter than the seeds. According to the values of a and b, there were statistically significant difference between the findings of gum samples (p &lt; 0.05). The a values of gums were lower than seeds for the same reason of L values. The b values of gums were higher than seeds; this result show that gums color is the light yellow. As for the hue and chroma values were available statistically significant difference between gum samples (p &lt; 0.05) because of the differences a and b values.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Chemical Composition of the Gums</title><p>The chemical composition of the gums obtained from different extraction methods are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. In general results are quite similar each other in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref23">23</xref>] . Among these studies, in the LBGs the lowest protein content (1%) was reported by Avallone et al. (1997) and the highest protein content (10.3% - 17.1%) was reported by K&#246;k (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref23">23</xref>] . The ash and moisture results are similar with the given studies. Also, Dakia et al. (2008) reported to the sugar contents for two different LBG samples as 4.5% and 6.8% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The ash and protein contents were reduced while the purification of LBGs from seeds because of eliminated practically all fat and fibre [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] . High range of the ash content obtained in seed may be caused by the coat and the germ mineral substances. Moreover, high protein content obtained from LBG3 compared to other LBGs may be due to a contamination by carob germ which contains high protein amount. About 5% the protein content of the crude gum is based on the natural presence of structural proteins and enzymes, but also a possible contamination with seed germ [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] . As for high sugar content obtained in LBG1 may be due to a contamination by seed coat or during the acid extraction to come distortion and then a piece of sugar to be free. The free sugar amount increase the presence of minor amount of rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and glucose could be attributed to a more complex polysaccharide composition or contamination by the seed coat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] . The extraction endosperm from the seeds allows impurities in the commercially sold gum and obviously this has a direct impact on sugar composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Composition of the seed can change from growing conditions of carob fruit and tree, keeping conditions after the harvesting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] . For this reason, there were some differences between studies due to using carob seeds from different regions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Gum Solution Results</title><p>The some of gum solutions (1%, w/v) properties as particulates (P), soluble solids (Ss), total acidity (Ta), pH and acid-insoluble ash (Aia) of gums are also shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The acid-insoluble matter refers to the presence of acid-insoluble impurities in gums such as metals. This amount indicates impurity substances in gums so this property is unwanted. The crude and purified locust bean gum from seven areas of the north and center of Tunisia were analyzed for acid-insoluble matter by Bouzouita et al. (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] . The cured LBG from different regions had 5.38% - 8.60% acid-insoluble matter. Our results were similar to those reported by Bouzouita et al. (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>The other important property of LBGs is contained low particulates. The particulates remained insoluble impurities after heating to 70˚C. The presence of particulate negatively affects the quality of the gum and its functional properties to viscosity and gelling. K&#246;k (2007) analyzed for particulate of higher quality refined locust bean gum (rLBG) and lower quality crude locust bean gum (cLBG) samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref2">2</xref>] . The rLBG had 0% particulate</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Some chemical properties of gums</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Moisture (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ash (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Protein (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sugar (%)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.30<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >09.75<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.22<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >08.11<sup>c</sup> &#177; 1.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94<sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.65<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.74<sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.16</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Some properties of gum solutions</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aia (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ss (˚bx)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ta (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.99<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0034<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.63<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.58<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.17<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0053<sup>a</sup> &#177; 0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.15<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >LBG3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.36<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.62<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73<sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0026<sup>b</sup> &#177; 0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.52<sup>c</sup> &#177; 0.02</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p &gt; 0.05); <sup>**</sup>Total acidity was given anhydrous citric acid.</p><p>and the cLBG had 7% - 38% particulates. In our study, crude locust bean gums were derived so our results (34.99% - 44.17%) were similar to those reported by K&#246;k (2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Another important property of LBGs is brix value indicates soluble solids in water. This value consists of sugars firstly such as glucose, fructose and sucrose, in addition to various organic acids such as citric acid, malic acid. In this study, soluble solids results were consistent with sugar content predictably.</p><p>The total acidity and pH value are important factors to be obtained. The pH value is an expression of hydrogen ion activity and the lower the pH value increases the acidity of the environment. The total acidity and pH value are statistically significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) in LBG samples. In the literature, there is no evidence of the amount of total acidity, pH and soluble solids of gum solutions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Viscosity</title><p>Viscosity of LBG solutions prepared by adding 600 ml and 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, at 75˚C are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>Viscosity of LBG solutions were measured for 3 minutes 30 seconds intervals and the graphics are drawn at <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. As shown the graphic, viscosity values were statistically significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) between the LBG samples.</p><p>Viscosity of LBG2 and LBG3 are significant differences at the first and the last moments, but the rapidity of increase in viscosity for these samples were similar. Viscosity of the LBG1 and the rapidity of viscosity increases were found to be higher than other gum solutions. The viscosity of LBG3 was found lower than the other samples. The reason is that, used boiling water during the extraction process of LBG3 had a negative effect on the viscosity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref24">24</xref>] . Our viscosity results were quite similar to each other studies in the literature. Biliaderis et al. (2000) purified locust bean gums from twelve different regions of Greece and measured viscosity of 1% (w/v) LBG solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref1">1</xref>] . During the measurement, they used Ubbelohde No 1 Capillary Viscometer and found viscosity values between 0.4 - 1.4 Pas at 25˚C and 100 rpm. Also Demirtaş (2007) obtained LBG by soaking seeds in solutions of various chemicals of different concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref14">14</xref>] . Viscosity of 1% solutions were measured with the Brookfield DV-II + Pro Viscometer at 25˚C and 100 rpm and found that between 0.296 to 2.482 Pas. At the other study, Dakia et al. (2008) compared the viscosity of two different LBGs applied water and acid extraction process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54048-ref7">7</xref>] . They prepared 1% solutions at 10 s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> and 300 s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> shear rates at 25˚C and 80˚C and they measured viscosity of this LBG with the Rotovisco Haake RV20 Rotational Viscometer. At the same concentration, the water extraction gum solution had a lower viscosity than the acid extraction gum solution at low and high temperatures. At the same time, the viscosity of gums decreased when the shear rate increased. At the same shear rate the viscosity of gums increased with increasing temperature. These results show that viscosities of gum solutions due to temperature and shear rate.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Viscosity values of LBG solutions (mPas)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701355x23.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>5. Conclusions</title><p>In this study, locust bean gums were produced from carob seeds with three different extraction methods. Some physical and chemical properties of these LBGs were analyzed and investigated the effect of extraction methods on the LBGs.</p><p>For these methods, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> extraction fails in seed dehulling process. The reason for this, concentration and amount of the solution are thought to be insufficient. As for the HCl extraction, method is used successfully in the seed dehulling process. However; this method has a disadvantage about samples amounts which are used for high content. Water extraction method is the most successful method for seed dehulling process. At the same time, maximum range of gum is obtained in this method. But more effort and consuming time are needed for used human power.</p><p>For obtaining high quality locust bean gum, the ash, protein, acid insoluble ash, particulates values should be low and the viscosity should be high. When these properties are examined, water and HCl extraction gums have highly undesirable characteristics and H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> extraction gum is found within the limits of the appropriate. The most important quality criterion of gums is the viscosity. According to the viscosity results, the high viscosity value is obtained from the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> extraction. For all these reasons, the results of investigation study showed that the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> extraction method was found to be more appropriate than HCl and water extraction methods to obtain a good quality gum.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank to “Suleyman Demirel University Unit of Scientific Research Project Commission” for funding of the research and “Directorate of Konya Provincial Control Laboratory” for their support to methodology.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54048-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouzouita, N., Khaldi, A., Zgoulli, S., Chebil, L., Chekki, R., Chaabouni, M.M. and Thonart, P. (2007) The Analysis of Crude and Purified Locust Bean Gum: A Comparison of Samples from Different Carob Tree Populations in Tunisia. Food Chemistry, 101, 1508-1515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.03.056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kok, M.S. (2007) A Comparative Study on the Compositions of Crude and Refined Locust Bean Gum: In Relation to Rheological Properties. Carbohydrate Polymers, 70, 68-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.03.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edwards, H.G.M., Falk, M.J., Sibley, M.G., Alvarez-Benedi, J. and Rull, F. (1998) FT-Raman Spectroscopy of Gums of Technological Significance. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 54, 903-920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(98)00018-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Biliaderis, C.G., Lazaridou, A. and Izydorczyk, M.S. (2000) Structural Characteristics and Rheological Properties of Locust Bean Galactomannans: A Comparison of Samples from Different Carob Tree Populations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81, 68-75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pollard, M.A., Kelly, R., Wahl, C., Fischer, P., Windhab, E., Eder, B. and Amado, R. (2007) Investigation of Equilibrium Solubility of a Carob Galactomannan. Food Hydrocolloids, 21, 683-692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.08.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neukom, H. (1988) Carob Bean Gum: Properties and Applications. Proceedings of the II International Carob Symposium, 551-555.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dakia, P.A., Blecker, C., Robert, C., Wathelet, B. and Paquot, M. (2008) Composition and Physicochemical Properties of Locust Bean Gum Extracted from Whole Seeds by Acid or Water Dehulling Pre-Treatment. Food Hydrocolloids, 22, 807-818. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.03.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nussinovitch, A. (1997) Gum Technology in the Food and Other Industries.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dakia, P.A., Wathelet, B. and Paquot, M. (2007) Isolation and Chemical Evaluation of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) Seed Germ. Food Chemistry, 102, 1368-1374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Azero, E.G., Lopes, L.L. and Andrade, C.T. (1997) Extraction and Solution Properties of the Galactomannan from the Seeds of Cassia javanica L. Polymer Bulletin, 39, 621-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002890050194</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonymous (2003) Turkish Food Legislation. Turk Gida Mevzuati.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Picout, D.R., Ross-Murphy, S.B., Jumel, K. and Harding, S.E. (2002) Pressure Cell Assisted Solution Characterization of Polysaccharides. 2. Locust Bean Gum and Tara Gum. Biomacromolecules, 3, 761-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm025517c</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lazaridou, A., Biliaderis, C.G. and Izydorczyk, M.S. (2000) Structural Characteristics and Rheological Properties of Locust Bean Galactomannans: A Comparison of Samples from Different Carob Tree Populations. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 81, 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0010(20010101)81:1&lt;68::AID-JSFA780&gt;3.0.CO;2-G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demirtas, O. (2007) Investigation of Gum Production Possibilities from Locust Bean (Ceratonia siliqua) seeds. Keciboynuzu (Ceratonia siliqua) cekirdeklerinden gam uretim yollarinin arastirilmasi. Master Thesis, Cukurova University, Institute of Science, Cukurova Universitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu, Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Adana.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tous, J., Romero, A., Hermoso, J.F., Ninot, A., Plana, J. and Batlle, I. (2009) Agronomic and Commercial Performance of four Spanish Carob Cultivars. HorlTechonology, 19, 465-470.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ersus, S. and Yurdagel, U. (2007) Microencapsulation of Anthocyanin Pigments of Black Carrot (Daucus carota L.) by Spray Drier. Journal of Food Engineering, 80, 805-812. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cemeroglu, B. (2010) Food Analysis. 70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Praznik, W., Mundigler, N., Kogler, A., Wollerdorfer, M., Pelzi, B. and Huber, A. (1999) Molecular Background of Technological Properties of Selected Starches. Starch, 51, 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-379X(199906)51:6&lt;197::AID-STAR197&gt;3.0.CO;2-K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anonymous (2006) Analysis Work Instructions for Acid Insoluble Ash Determination of Plum Nectar. Erik Nektarinda Asitte Cozunmeyen Kul Miktari Tayini Analiz Calisma Talimati, Konya Il Kontrol Laboratuar Mudurlugu.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kok, M.S., Hill, S.E. and Mitchell, J.R. (1999) Analysis Work Instructions for Acid Insoluble Ash Determination of Plum Nectar. Food Hydrocolloids, 13, 535-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(99)00040-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yilmaz, I. (2002) Selcuk University, Symposium of 30th Year in Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering Education. Selcuk Universitesi Jeodezi ve Fotogrametri Muhendisligi Ogretiminde 30. Yil Sempozyumu, 340-350.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Erbay, B. (2004) Evaluation of Color Changes in Fresh Cut Apple Slices with Machine Vision System. Taze kesilmis elma dilimlerinde renk degisiminin bilgisayarli goruntuleme sistemi ile incelenmesi. Master Thesis, Suleyman Demirel Universiy, Institute of Science, Isparta.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Avallone, R., Plessi, M., Baraldi, M. and Monzani, A. (1997) Determination of Chemical Composition of Carob (Ceratonia siliqua): Protein, Fat, Carbohydrates, and Tannins. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 10, 166-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jfca.1997.0528</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54048-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Higiro, J., Herald, T.J., Alavi, S. and Bean, S. (2007) Rheological Study of Xanthan and Locust Bean Gum Interaction in Dilute Solution: Effect of Salt. Food Research International, 40, 435-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.02.002</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>