<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2015.62025</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-53792</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Energy Identities of ADI-FDTD Method with Periodic Structure
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>engang</surname><given-names>Shi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Haitian</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Applied Mathematics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Engineering Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>srg831@163.com(ES)</email>;<email>haitian@dlut.edu.cn(HY)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>02</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>265</fpage><lpage>273</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>28</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In this paper, a new kind of energy identities for the Maxwell equations with periodic boundary conditions is proposed and then proved rigorously by the energy methods. By these identities, several modified energy identities of the ADI-FDTD scheme for the two dimensional (2D) Maxwell equations with the periodic boundary conditions are derived. Also by these identities it is proved that 2D-ADI-FDTD is approximately energy conserved and unconditionally stable in the discrete L
  <sup>2</sup> and H
  <sup>1</sup> norms. Experiments are provided and the numerical results confirm the theoretical analysis on stability and energy conservation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Stability</kwd><kwd> Energy Conservation</kwd><kwd> ADI-FDTD</kwd><kwd> Maxwell Equations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The alternative direction implicit finite difference time domain (ADI-FDTD) methods, proposed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref2">2</xref>] , are interesting and efficient methods for numerical solutions of Maxwell equations in time domain, and cause many researchers’ work since ADI-FDTD overcomes the stability constraint of the FDTD scheme [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref3">3</xref>] . For example, it was proved by Fourier methods in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref4">4</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref8">8</xref>] that the ADI-FDTD methods are unconditionally stable and have reasonable numerical dispersion error; Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref9">9</xref>] studied the divergence property; Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref10">10</xref>] studied ADI-FDTD in a perfectly matched medium; Reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref11">11</xref>] gave an efficient PML implementation for the ADI-FDTD method. By Poynting’s theorem, Energy conservation is an important property for Maxwell equations and good numerical method should conform it. In 2012, Gao [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53792-ref12">12</xref>] proposed several new energy identities of the two dimensional (2D) Maxwell equations with the perfectly electric conducting (PEC) boundary conditions and proved that ADI-FDTD is approximately energy conserved and unconditionally in the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms. Is there any other structure which can keep energy conservation for Maxwell equations? Is there any other energy identity for ADI-FDTD method? This two interesting questions promote us to find other energy- conservation structure.</p><p>In this paper, we focus our attention on structure with periodic boundary conditions and propose energy identities in L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms of the 2D Maxwell equations with periodic boundary conditions. We derive the energy identities of ADI-FDTD for the 2D Maxwell equations (2D-ADI-FDTD) with periodic boundary conditions by a new energy method. Several modified energy identities of 2D-ADI-FDTD in terms of the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms are presented. By these identities it is proved that 2D-ADI-FDTD with the periodic boundary conditions is unconditionally stable and approximately energy conserved under the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms. To test the analysis, experiments to solve a simple problem with exact solution are provided. Computational results of the energy and error in terms of the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms confirm the analysis on the energy conservation and the unconditional stability.</p><p>The remaining parts of the paper are organized as follows. In Section 2, energy identities of the 2D Maxwell equations with periodic conditions in L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms are first derived. In Section 3, several modified energy identities of the 2D-ADI-FDTD method are derived, the unconditional stability and the approximate energy conservation in the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms are then proved. In Section 4, the numerical experiments are presented.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Energy Conservation of Maxwell Equations and 2D-ADI-FDTD</title><p>Consider the two-dimensional (2D) Maxwell equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula412"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in a rectangular domain with electric permittivity ε and magnetic permeability μ, where ε and μ are positive constants; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denote the electric and magnetic fields, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We assume that the rectangular region Ω is surrounded by periodic boundaries, so the boundary conditions can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula413"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula414"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We also assume the initial conditions</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula415"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It can be derived by integration by parts and the periodic boundary conditions (2.2)-(2.3) that the above Maxwell equations have the energy identities:</p><p>Lemma 2.1 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the solution of the Maxwellsystems (2.1)-(2.4). Then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula416"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where and in what follows, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>denotes the L<sup>2</sup> norm with the weights ε (corresponding electric field) or &#181; (magnetic field). For example,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula417"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Identity (2.5) is called the Poynting Theorem and can be seen in many classical physics books. Besides the above energy identities, we found new ones below.</p><p>Theorem 2.2 Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the solution of the Maxwell systems (2.1)-(2.4), the same as those in Lemma 2.1. Then, the following energy identities hold</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula418"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula419"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where u = x or y, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the H<sup>1</sup> norm (the H<sup>1</sup> norm of f is defined by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is also called the H<sup>1</sup>-semi norm of f).</p><p>Proof. First, we prove Equation (2.7) with u = x. Differentiating each of the Equations in (2.1) with respect to x leads to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula420"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By the integration by parts and the periodic boundary conditions (2.2)-(2.3), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula421"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula422"><label>(2.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Multiplying the Equations (2.9) by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, integrating both sides over <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and using (2.10), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula423"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (2.1) and the boundary conditions (2.2)-(2.3) we note that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula424"><label>(2.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then, by integrating (2.12) with respect to time over<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get equation (2.7) with u = x. Similarly, the identity (2.7) with u = y can be proved. Combining (2.5) and (2.7) leads to (2.8). <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p>The 2D-ADI-FDTD Scheme<p>The alternating direction implicit FDTD method for the 2D Maxwell equations (denoted by 2D-ADI-FDTD) was proposed by (Namiki, 1999). For convenience in analysis of this scheme, next we give some notations. Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula425"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where Δx and Δy are the mesh sizes along x and y directions, ∆t is the time step, I, J and N are positive integers. For a grid function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula426"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where u = x, y or t. For<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, define some discrete energy norms based on the Yee staggered grids (Yee, 1966),</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula427"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Other norms:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are similarly defined. Denote by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>the approximations of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (u = x, y) and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, respectively. Then the 2D-ADI-FDTD scheme for (2.1) is written as</p><p>Stage 1:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula428"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula429"><label>(2.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula430"><label>(2.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Stage 2:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula431"><label>(2.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula432"><label>(2.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula433"><label>(2.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For simplicity in notations, we sometimes omit the subscripts of these field values without causing any ambiguity. By the definition of cross product of vectors, the boundary conditions for (2.2)-(2.3) become</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (2.20)</p><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Finally, the initial values <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the2D-ADI-FDTD scheme are obtained by the initial condition (2.4).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Modified Energy Identities and Stability of 2D-ADI-FDTD in H<sup>1</sup> Norm</title><p>In this Section we derive modified energy identities of 2D-ADI-FDTD and prove its energy conservation and unconditional stability in the discrete H<sup>1</sup> norm.</p><p>Theorem 3.1 Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the solution of the ADI-FDTD scheme (2.14)-(2.19). Then the following modified energy identities hold,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula434"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula435"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or 0</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula436"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. First we prove (3.1). Applying <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to the Equations (2.14)-(2.19), and rearranging the terms by the time levels, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula437"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x74.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula438"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x75.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula439"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x76.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula440"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula441"><label>(3.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x78.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula442"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Multiplying both sides of the equations, (3.3)-(3.4) by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, and those of (3.5) by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and taking the square of the updated equations lead to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula443"><label>(3.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula444"><label>(3.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula445"><label>(3.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying summation by parts, we see that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula446"><label>(3.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where we have used that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which can be obtained from the periodic boundary conditions. Similarly, we get that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula447"><label>(3.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So, if summing each of the Equalities (3.9)-(3.11) over their subscripts, adding the updated equations, multiplying both sides by ΔxΔy, and using the two identities, (3.12) and (3.13), together with the norms defined in Subsection 2.2, we arrive at</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula448"><label>(3.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similar argument is applied to the second Stage (3.6)-(3.8), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula449"><label>(3.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combination of (3.14) and (3.15) leads to the identity (3.1). Identity (3.2) is similarly derived by repeating the above argument from the operated Equations (2.14)-(2.19) by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>In the above proof, if taking <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as the identity operator, we obtain that</p><p>Theorem 3.2 Let<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the solution of 2D-ADI-FDTD. Then, the following energy identities hold</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula450"><label>(3.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Combining the results in Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 we have</p><p>Theorem 3.3 If the discrete H<sup>1</sup> semi-norm and H<sup>1</sup> norm of the solution of 2D-ADI-FDTD are denoted respectively by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula451"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then, the following energy identities for 2D-ADI-FDTD hold</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula452"><label>(3.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula453"><label>(3.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Remark 3.4 It is easy to see that the identities in Theorems 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3converge to those in Lemma 2.1 and Theorem 2.2 as the discrete step sizes approach zero. This means that2D-ADI-FDTD is approximately energy-conserved and unconditionally stable in the modified discrete form of the L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Experiments</title><p>In this section we solve a model problem by 2D-ADI-FDTD, and then test the analysis of the stability and energy conservation in Section 3 by comparing the numerical solution with the exact solution of the model. The model considered is the Maxwell equations (2.1) with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and its exact so-</p><p>lution is:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>It is easy to compute the norms of this solution are</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula454"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x107.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Simulation of the Error and Stability</title><p>To show the accuracy of 2D-ADI-FDTD, we define the errors:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula455"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x108.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are the true values of the exact solution. Denote the error and relative error in the norms defined in Section 3 by ErL<sub>2</sub>, R-ErL<sub>2</sub>, ErH<sub>1</sub> and R-ErH<sub>1</sub>, i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula456"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x112.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula457"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x113.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula458"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where log is the logarithmic function.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> gives the error and relative error of the numerical solution of the model problem computed by 2D- ADI-FDTD in the norms, and the convergence rates with different time step sizes Δt = 4h, 2h and h, when Δx = Δy = h = 0.01 is fixed and T = 1. From these results we see that the convergence rate of 2D-ADI-FDTD with respect to time is approximately 2 and that 2D-ADI-FDTD is unconditionally stable (when Δt = Δx = Δy = h,</p><p>the CFL number<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>).</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> lists the similar results to <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> when Δt = 0.1h is fixed, Δx = Δy varies from 2h, h and 0.5h, and the time length T = 1. From the columns “Rate” we see that 2D-ADI-FDTD is of second order in space under the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norm.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Simulation of the Energy Conservation of 2D-ADI-FDTD</title><p>In this subsection we check the energy conservation of 2D-ADI-FDTD by computing the modified energy norms derived in Section 3 for the solution to the scheme. Denote these modified energy norms by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula459"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula460"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53792-formula461"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x118.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> are presented the energy norms <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the solution of the 2D-ADI-FDTD scheme at the time levels n = 0, n = 1000 and n = 4000 (the third to fifth rows), and the absolute values of their difference (the last two rows), where the sizes of the spatial and time steps are Δx = Δy = 0.01, Δt = 0.04. The second row shows the four kind of energies of the exact solution computed by using the definitions of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. From these value we see that 2D-ADI-FDTD is approximately energy-conserved.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Error of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> with Δx = Δy = h and different Δt</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δt</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R-ErL<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ErL<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R-ErH<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ErH<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0284e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5254e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0287e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.6675e−1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6264e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3001e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8901</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6265e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0595e−1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8901</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1571e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2932e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1571e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5229e−2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3182</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Error of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> with Δt = 0.1h and different spatial step sizes</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Δx = Δy</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R-ErL<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ErL<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R-ErH<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >ErH<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0019e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.3182e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0019e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.4333e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4981e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1186e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7393</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4981e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8942e−3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7393</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0200e−4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6851e−4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8979</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0200e−4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0834e−4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8978</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Energy of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and its error when Δx = Δy = h = 0.01, Δt = 4h and n = 0, 1000, 4000</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fields\Norms</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7183</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x129.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7183</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7183</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.9367</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7183</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2685e−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2685e−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2403e−14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6718e−13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402604x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2685e−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2685e−13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.2403e−14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6718e−13</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, the modified energy identities of the 2D-ADI-FDTD scheme with the periodic boundary conditions in the discrete L<sup>2</sup> and H<sup>1</sup> norms are established which show that this scheme is approximately energy conserved in terms of the two energy norms. By the deriving methods for the energy identities, new kind of energy identities of the Maxwell equations are proposed and proved by the new energy method. Numerical experiments are provided and confirm the analysis of 2D-ADI-FDTD.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.53792-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Namiki, T. (1999) A New FDTD Algorithm Based on Alternating-Direction Implicit Method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 47, 2003-2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.795075</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, F., Chen, Z. and Zhang, J. (2000) Toward the Development of a Three-Dimensional Unconditionally Stable Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 48, 1550-1558.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.869007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yee, K. (1966) Numerical Solution of Initial Boundary Value Problems Involving Maxwell’s Equations in Isotropic Media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 14, 302-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1966.1138693</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Namiki, T. and Ito, K. (2000) Investigation of Numerical Errors of the Two-Dimensional ADI-FDTD Method [for Maxwell’s Equations Solution]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 48, 1950-1956.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.883876</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zheng, F. and Chen, Z. (2001) Numerical Dispersion Analysis of the Unconditionally Stable 3D ADI-FDTD Method. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 49, 1006-1009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/22.920165</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, A.P. (2004) Consistency of Numerical Dispersion Relation Expressed in Different Forms for the ADI-FDTD Method. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 40, 12-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mop.11272</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia, S.G., Rubio, R.G., Bretones, A.B. and Martin, R.G. (2006) On the Dispersion Relation of ADI-FDTD. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 16, 354-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2006.875619</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fu, W. and Tan, E.L. (2007) Stability and Dispersion Analysis for ADI-FDTD Method in Lossy Media. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 55, 1095-1102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2007.893378</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smithe, D.N., Cary, J.R. and Carlsson, J.A. (2009) Divergence Preservation in the ADI Algorithms for Electromagnetics. Journal of Computational Physics, 228, 7289-7299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.06.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gedney, S.D., Liu, G., Roden, J.A. and Zhu, A. (2001) Perfectly Matched Layer Media with CFS for an Unconditional Stable ADI-FDTD Method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 49, 1554-1559.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/8.964091</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, S. and Teixeira, F.L. (2003) An Efficient PML Implementation for the ADI-FDTD Method. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, 13, 72-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2003.808705</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53792-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, L. (2012) Stability and Super Convergence Analysis of ADI-FDTD for the 2D Maxwell Equations in a Lossy Medium. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 32, 2341-2368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0252-9602(12)60184-2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>