<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Forestry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2163-0429</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojf.2015.52019</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJF-53541</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Spatial Distribution of Regenerated Woody Plants in &lt;i&gt;Alnus hirsuta&lt;/i&gt; (Turcz.) var. &lt;i&gt;sibirica&lt;/i&gt; Stand in Japan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>iroyuki</surname><given-names>Tobita</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Satoshi</surname><given-names>Nanami</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shigeaki</surname><given-names>F. Hasegawa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kenichi</surname><given-names>Yazaki</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Masabumi</surname><given-names>Komatsu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mitsutoshi</surname><given-names>Kitao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Present Address: Department of Plant Ecology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>tobi@ffpri.affrc.go.jp(IT)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>01</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>210</fpage><lpage>220</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>23</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The role of N2 fixation in structuring plant communities and influencing ecosystem function will be potentially large. In previous study, we investigated nodule biomass and activity, and calculated the amount of N
  <sub>2</sub> fixation in a naturally established 18-year-old alder (
  <em>Alnus hirsute</em> (Turcz.) var. 
  <em>sibirica</em>) stand following disturbance by road construction in Takayama, central Japan. In this study, to estimate the facilitation effects by alder on the spatial distribution of the regenerated tree species, we examined the distribution pattern of the regenerated tree species in this naturally established 18-year-old alder stand. The distribution pattern of alder and the regenerated woody species was analyzed in terms of spatial point processes and the regenerated species tended to distribute near the alder site. In particular, bird-dispersed tree species (endozoochory species) with relatively high shade tolerance showed a significant attraction to alder. These results suggest that alder will be used as roost trees and play the role of mother trees for these regenerated species at the degraded site. It was also suggested that the endozoochory species, which occupy 13 of 26 regenerated species in this stand, might regenerate faster than other species at this alder stand.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bird-Dispersal</kwd><kwd> N2 Fixation</kwd><kwd> Roost Trees</kwd><kwd> Spatial Distribution</kwd><kwd> Succession</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Given the virtually ubiquitous limitation of plant growth by N supply  (Vitousek &amp; Howarth, 1991) , the role of N<sub>2</sub> fixation in structuring plant communities and influencing ecosystem function is potentially large  (Chapin et al., 1994;   Thomas &amp; Bowman, 1998) . Nitrogen accretion is accelerating due to N<sub>2</sub> fixation during community development, facilitating invasion by later successional species and accelerating the rate at which succession proceeds  (Thomas &amp; Bowman, 1998) . Interspecific facilitation by plants may be more important in structuring plant communities and the ecosystem function than previously thought  (Hunter &amp; Aarssen, 1988;   Callaway &amp; Walker, 1997) . For example, alpine Trifolium species have high rates of symbiotic N<sub>2</sub> fixation, which influenced the abundance, and growth of nearby plant species growing  (Thomas &amp; Bowman, 1998) . The abundance of some species was positively associated with the presence of Trifolium, though other species were less abundant. These results suggest that N<sub>2</sub> fixing species may exert both facilitative and inhibitive effects on the abundance and growth of plant species growing near them and, in the process, substantially influence the spatial heterogeneity in community structure and primary production.</p><p>Species of actinorhizal Alnus that fix N through the metabolic activity of the filamentous bacterial symbiont Frankia, play an important role in the N cycle of temperate forest ecosystems  (Tjepkema et al.,1986; Tobita et al., 2013b) . An interest in these Frankia-Alnus systems has increased as their value in the revegetation of deteriorated wildlife habitats and the rehabilitation of N-deficient disturbed areas has become apparent  (Sharma, 1988;   Baker &amp; Schwintzer, 1990;   Zitzer &amp; Dawson, 1992;   Tobita et al., 1993;   Chapin et al., 1994; Enoki et al., 1997) . In the mixed Alnus-conifer young-growth stands, Alnus species appear to provide much more productive understory vegetation and wildlife habitat than similar-aged pure conifer stands  (Hanley et al., 2006) . Alnus species often regenerate naturally at disturbed sites by road constructions or natural soil slide, and so on  (Tobita et al., 2010) . If there are facilitative effects on plant abundance by the N<sub>2</sub>-fixer, Alnus species, the distribution pattern of regenerated plants may be also influenced by the distribution of alder.</p><p>Dispersal mechanisms promoting seed arrival from distant sources are key in primary succession  (Finegan, 1984;   Walker &amp; Chapin, 1987) . As plants are sessile, both the initial spatial pattern of offspring  (Houle, 1992)  and the spatial population structure  (Armest et al., 1991)  are determined by the location of parent plants and their seed dispersal ability  (Nanami et al., 1999) . In addition, stands established on degraded soils will have no mother trees of other tree species at an early stage of stand development. Large trees of other tree species, roost trees for the birds, act as foci for depositing and recruiting of bird-dispersed, endozoochory, plants  (Hatton, 1989;   Maltez-Mouro et al., 2007) . In the temperate zones, many fleshy-fruited plants rely on migrating birds to disperse their seeds  (Johnson et al., 1985;   Nakanishi, 1996) . If Alnus species may perform as roost trees for birds and play a role as mother trees, endozoochory tree species might distribute around the Alnus trees as shown in  Maltez-Mouro et al. (2007) .</p><p>Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica is a deciduous early successional tree species that is widely distributed in northern districts and highlands of Japan. We investigated nodule biomass and the amount of N<sub>2</sub> fixation in a naturally established 18-year-old stand of A. hirsuta var. sibirica in areas degraded by road construction in Takayama, central Japan  (Tobita et al., 2010, 2013a) . We found the horizontal distribution of nodules in A. hirsuta var. sibirica varied among tree sizes, and in particular, for trees with smaller dbh, there was a concentration of nodule density near the stem  (Tobita et al., 2010) . In addition, the N<sub>2</sub> fixation rate in this A. hirsuta var. sibirica stand was estimated at 56.4 kg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>∙year<sup>−1</sup>, which corresponded to 66.4% of the N content in leaf litter in a year  (Tobita et al., 2013a) . These results suggested that the N<sub>2</sub> fixation of A. hirsuta var. sibirica contributed to rapid N accumulation into the soil. In this study, we tried to clarify the effects of the Alnus species on the spatial distribution of regenerated tree species at this naturally established 18-year-old stand of A. hirsuta var. sibirica.</p><p>Of course, many processes, such as the germination and survival of seeds and seedlings, growth of saplings, competition between herbaceous species, light environment, soil water content, and litter as physical obstructions, should contribute to the present distribution of each species  (Hatton, 1989) . In this study, we consider the potential impact of the presence of Alnus species as one of many factors of determining for the spatial distribution of the regenerated woody plants.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Site</title><p>The study site was at an altitude of approximately 1100 m on Mt. Norikura in the eastern part of Takayama city, Gifu prefecture, central Japan (36˚9'N, 137˚15'E). A study plot of 30 &#180; 35 m was set up in an alder (Alnus hirsuta Turcz. var. sibirica (Fischer) C.K. Schn.) stand (in detail:  Tobita et al., 2010 ). Alder regenerated naturally after the disturbance when a road was built through the site in 1975. Alders are a deciduous and early successional species, widely distributed in the northern districts and highlands of Japan. These trees are used to improve the growth of mixed conifer plantations, produce logs and revegetate degenerated soil. In our study site, all the canopy trees were alders. The tree height was about 15 m, and the canopy of this stand was almost closed  (Hasegawa &amp; Takeda, 2001;   Tobita et al., 2010) . The mean (&#177; SD) stem diameter at breast height (dbh) of trees was 12.4 (&#177;3.8) cm in April 1995 and the frequency distribution of dbh was unimodal, indicating that this stand comprised trees of similar age  (Tobita et al., 2010) . Because several trees died during the study, the stand density varied from 1114 ha<sup>−1</sup> in April 1995 to 1038 ha<sup>−1</sup> in May 1996. Although the site floor was densely covered in herbaceous plants, regenerating specimens of several species of trees and shrubs were also present. The neighboring forest stand was used for coppicing, and has been dominated by Pinus thunbergii, Quercus mongolica, Betula platyphylla var. japonica, Prunus grayana, Lindera obtusiloba, and Euptelea polyandra.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Regenerated Woody Plants</title><p>From June to November 1996, naturally regenerated woody species in the study site were mapped to analyze the pattern of spatial distribution and the height and positions of the stem base were measured. All regenerated species was divided into three groups by seed-dispersal type; namely as bolochory species by gravity, anemochory species by wind, and endozoochory species by birds.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Data Analysis of Spatial Distribution of Regenerated Woody Plants</title><p>The alder population, including trees which died before April 1995, was reconstructed using data on detectable fallen trees, dieback trees and stumps  (Tobita et al., 2010) . Subsequently, we constructed the five populations of alder; 1) Live trees in April 1995 and dead trees before April 1995; 2) live trees in April 1995; 3) live trees in April 1996; 4) live trees in April 1997 and 5) dead trees before April 1996. To analyze of the spatial interactions with the regenerated species, two populations of alder were used; live trees in April 1996 and dead trees before April 1996. We understand that the number of dead trees before April 1995 would be underestimate because we counted only those detectable, such as fallen trees, dieback trees, or stump.</p><p>The spatial pattern of regenerated woody species (all species and the major seven species, for which a relatively larger number of individuals emerged<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and alder populations was analyzed using the function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, a transformation of Ripley’s <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> function  (Ripley, 1977) , as suggested by  Besag, (1977) . The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as the expected number of plants within distance t of an arbitrarily chosen plant. The unbiased estimate of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53541-formula973"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the number of plants in a plot<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>denotes plot area; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the distance between ith and jth plants in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is equal to 1 if <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and 0 otherwise; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the proportion of the circumference of a circle, centered at the ith plant and radius <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that lies within<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; and summation is for all pairs of plants not more than t apart  (Ripley, 1977;   Diggle, 1983;   Nanami et al., 1999) . <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53541-formula974"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>A value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicates that the spatial pattern at distance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is random. Values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicate clumped distributions, while those of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicate regular distributions.</p><p>The spatial interaction between two groups of plants was also analyzed using the bivariate function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, a transformation of the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>  (Lotwick &amp; Silverman, 1982) :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53541-formula975"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a generalization of the function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> to a bivariate point process. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>indicates that the two groups are spatially independent, values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicate a positive association (attraction) and values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> indicate a negative association (repulsion). The significance of both functions was determined with Monte Carlo simulations  (Besag, 1977;   Nanami et al., 1999) . The null hypothesis is complete spatial randomness. To analyze the univariate spatial pattern, spatial independence was assumed for bivariate spatial interactions between two groups. Ninety-five per cent confidence envelopes were defined as the highest and lowest values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for each spatial scale found in 950 analyses of random point distributions. Ninety-nine per cent confidence envelopes require 990 simulations. Earlier uses of both functions and Monte Carlo simulations are discussed  (Peterson &amp; Squierss, 1995; Nanami et al., 1999) .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Spatial Distribution Pattern of Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica</title><p>The alder populations showed significant clumped distribution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>); live and dead trees in April 1995 at 0.5 m (P &lt; 0.01), live trees in 1996 at 9.5 - 10.0 m (P&lt; 0.05) and 0.5 m (P &lt; 0.05), and live trees in 1997 at 0.5 - 1.0 m (P &lt; 0.05). The magnitude of departure from randomness at large distance declined from 1995 to 1997.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Species Composition</title><p>In this stand, 23 woody species with 389 individuals were regenerated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>) and the plant density of all regenerated plants was 0.37 plants m<sup>−2</sup> in this stand. These regenerated species included 14 tree species with 229 individuals, and 9 shrub species with 160 individuals. 13 endozoochory plants with 239 individuals, 7 anemochory plants with 106 individuals, and 3 bolochory plants with 44 individuals comprising these regenerated plants. In terms of tree species, Prunus incisa, Cornus controversa, Juglans mandshurica, and Acer rufinerve were the major tree species, while Weigela hortensis, Sambucus racemosa, and Aralia elata were the major shrub species. There was no seedling of alder at the forest floor. The frequency of height of all regenerated woody species showed the mode at 0 - 0.5 m (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Except for Salix bakko, almost all individuals of each tree species were less than 4 m in height, while the height of the shrub species was less than 3 m, but the portion of taller individuals exceeded that of tree species.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>values for the population of Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica: (A) live trees in April 1995 and dead trees before April 1995; (B) live trees in April 1996; (C) live trees in April 1997. The solid line shows actual <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values of extant plants, dashed and dotted lines show 95 and 99% confidence envelopes derived from 1000 simulation of random point processes in the study plot, respectively. Values outside the envelopes indicate significant departures from randomness</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x37.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Number and height of regenerated woody species in this Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica stand. Species are shown in order by life form; tree species and shrub species. The seed dispersal type was shown as bolochory (B), endozoochory (E), and anemochory (A)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Species</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Seed dispersal</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Hight (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >type</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >plot<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 - 0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5 - 1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 - 1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 - 2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tree species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prunus incisa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cornus controversa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Juglans mandshurica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acer rufinerve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acer mono</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Castanea crenata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Malus toringo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pourthiaea villosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prunus grayana</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Prunus sargentii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salix bakko</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acer crataegifolium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Quercus mongolica</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhus trichocarpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Shrub species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weigela hortensis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sambucus racemosa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aralia elata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Euonymus sieboldianus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrangea paniculata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Viburnum opulus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stachyrus praecox</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Abelia serrata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lindera obtusiloba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >389</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Spatial Distribution Pattern of Regenerated Woody Species</title><p>The population of all regenerated tree species was significantly clumped at all distances (scales), and was maximally (without distinct peaks) clumped at 1.5 m (P &lt; 0.01; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(A)). The population of bolochory species (including 3 species) was significantly clumped at scales ranging from 1.5 to 2 m (P &lt; 0.05; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(B)). The population of endozoochory species (include 13 species) was also significantly clumped at all distances, 0.5 - 10 m (P &lt; 0.01; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(C)). The population of anemochory species (include 7 species) was significantly clumped at 0.5 - 5.5 m (P &lt; 0.01) and 6 m (P &lt; 0.05), and maximally clumped at 0.5 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(D)).</p><p>The major regenerated tree species, which appeared for more than 25 plants in this study plot, were seven species, including Juglans mandshurica of bolochory species, Acer rufinerve and Weigela hortensis of anemo-</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>values for the population of major seven regenerated woody species <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in this Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica stand: (A) all species (23 species,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>); (B) 3 bolochory species<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; (C) 13 endozoochory species<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; (D) 7 anemochory species <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> Conventions as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x40.png"/></fig><p>chory species, and Cornus controversa, Prunus incisa, Sambucus racemosa, and Aralia elata of endozoochory species. Acer rufinerve, Sambucus racemosa, and Aralia elata were significantly clumped at all distances (P &lt; 0.05 or 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(B), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(F) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(G)). One of the shrub species, Weigela hortensis, was also significantly clumped at almost all distance except 10 m (P &lt; 0.05 or 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(C)). The shrub species showed significant aggregation at a wider range than tree species. Within endozoochory species, the two tree species, Cornus controversa and Prunus incisa, showed different distribution pattern from the two shrub species, Sambucus racemosa, and Aralia elata. Cornus controversa was significantly clumped at 0.5 - 2 m (P &lt; 0.01) and 2.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(D)). Prunus incisa were significantly clumped at 0.5 - 3.5 m (P &lt; 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(E)). Juglans mandshurica showed no significant departure from randomness except at 0.5, 1.5, and 7.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(A)). Aralia elata showed a distinct peak at 3 m (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(G)).</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Spatial Interaction between Regenerated Woody Species and Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica</title><p>The population of all regenerated tree species showed a significant attraction to alder (live trees in 1996) at 0.5 - 2 m (P &lt; 0.01) and at 2.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(A)). As the results of analysis among seed dispersal patterns, the population of bolochory and anemochory species showed no significant departure from the independence of alder population (live trees in 1996) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(B) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(D)). The population of endozoochory species, which included 13 species, also showed a significant attraction to alder (live trees in 1996) at 0.5 - 1.5 m (P &lt; 0.01) and at 2 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(C)).</p><p>As the results of the analysis between each species and alder, Juglans mandshurica, Acer rufinerve, and Aralia elata showed no significant departure from the independence of alder population (live trees in 1996) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(A), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(B) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(G)). Weigela hortensis showed a significant repulsion from the alder population (live trees in 1996) at 4.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(C)). Prunus incisa showed a significant attraction to alder (live trees in 1996) at 0.5 - 2.5 m (P &lt; 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(E)). Sambucus racemosa showed a significant attraction to alder (live trees in 1996) at 2 - 2.5 and 5.5 - 7.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(F)). Cornus controversa showed no significant departure from the independence of alder population (live trees in 1996) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(D)), but showed a significant attraction to alder (live and dead trees in 1995) at 0.5 - 1.5 m (P &lt; 0.01) and at 2 - 2.5 (P &lt; 0.05) (data not shown).</p><p>Aralia elata showed a significant attraction to dead alder trees (dead trees as of 1996) at 0.5 m (P&lt; 0.05) and 1.5 m, 3.5 - 6.0 m (P &lt; 0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(C)). Weigela hortensis also showed a significant attraction to alder (dead trees as of 1996) at 2 - 2.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(B)). Acer rufinerve showed a significant repulsion from alder population (dead trees as of 1996) at 0.5 m (P &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(A)).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Regenerated woody species tended to distribute near the Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica. In particular, endozoochory</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>values for the population of each of seven major regenerated woody species <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in this Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica stand: (A) Juglans mandshurica; (B) Acer rufinerve; (C) Weigela hortensis; (D) Cornus controversa; (E) Prunus incisa; (F) Sambucus racemosa; (G) Aralia elata. Conventions as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x47.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>values of bivariate distribution of regenerated woody species population and Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica (live trees in April 1996): (A) all species (23 species,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>); (B) 3 bolochory species<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; (C) 13 endozoochory species<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; (D) 7 anemochory species<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The solid line shows actual <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> values of extant plants, dashed and dotted lines show 95% and 99% confidence envelopes derived from 1000 simulation of random point processes in the study plot, respectively</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x50.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>values of bivariate distribution of major seven regenerated woody species<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> population and Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica (live trees in April 1996): (A) Juglans mandshurica; (B) Acer rufinerve; (C) Weigela hortensis; (D) Cornus controversa; (E) Prunus incisa; (F) Sambucus racemosa; (G) Aralia elata. Conventions as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x57.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>values of bivariate distribution of three regenerated species and Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica (dead trees before April 1996): (A) Acer rufinerve; (B) Weigela hortensis; (C) Aeliaerata. Conventions as in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/8-1620237x60.png"/></fig><p>species with relatively high shade tolerance showed a significant attraction to alder. These results suggest alder will be used for roost trees and play a role as mother trees of these regenerated endozoochory tree species. It was suggested that endozoochory species, which occupied 13 of 26 regenerated species in this stand, might regenerate faster than species with other types of seed dispersal at the naturally regenerated stands of Alnus species after the soil disturbance.</p><p>The population of all regenerated tree species showed a significant attraction to alder (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(A)), but differed in terms of spatial interaction with Alnus species among the regenerated woody species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). As predicted, some endozoochory species, such as Prunus incisa and Sambucus racemosa, showed significant attraction to alder (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(E) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(F)). Viburnum tinus, which has bird-dispersal seeds, were clumped at the site without their mature trees on the upper trees  (Maltez-Mouro et al., 2007) . They discussed that one of the reasons for the aggregation pattern of the Viburnum tinus was because the seeds of Viburnum tinus were dispersed under those of other species, which were used as roosted trees by birds. In the case of herbaceous species with bird-dispersal seeds, they showed a strong aggregation pattern under large trees, which would act as roosting trees for birds and foci for to deposit and recruit endozoochory plants  (Hatton, 1989) . The number of birds in the plantations of Alnus species usually exceeds that of Eucalyptus and Pinus species, because the number of soil animals, which can be bird-fed, will increase with the soil fertilization  (Carlson &amp; Dawson, 1985) . In this study, we have no data on the number of birds and seed falls, but observed the gathering of birds in the crown of this alder stand during daytime. In this study plot, it was suggested that Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica was used as roost trees and mother trees for endozoochory species.</p><p>However, two of the four endozoochory species, Cornus controversa and Aralia elata, showed independent spatial distribution with alder (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(D) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(G)). Cornus controversa showed attraction when we analyzed spatial interaction including dead alder trees (data not shown). These results indicated that the attractive distribution pattern between Cornus controversa and alder became unclear with increasing dead alder trees. Conversely, Aralia elata attractively distributed relative to the population of dead alder trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(C)). These results indicated that it may be necessary for Aralia elata to improve the light conditions in addition to seed supply to regenerate in this alder stand, because Aralia elata is a species requiring significant light  (Tobita et al., 1993) .</p><p>Weigela hortensis, which is an anemochory species, showed a significant attraction with the population of dead alder trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(B)), and a significant repulsion from the population of live alder trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(C)).  Thomas &amp; Borman (1998)  reported the similar results; namely that some anemochory species showed repulsion from a leguminous species, Trifolium. However, Acer rufinerva, which is also an anemochory species, showed a significant repulsion with the population of dead alder trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(A)), and showed an independent distribution from the live alder population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(B)). Though Acer rufinervais an intolerant understory species  (Masaki et al., 1992) , these results suggest that Weigela hortensis may be more light demanding than Acer rufinerva  (Katsuta et al., 1998) . However, Weigela hortensis showed vegetative reproduction in several cases, which might affect the analytical results of the spatial distribution of this species.</p><p>The distribution pattern of bolochory species depends on the behavior of mammal species as well as the location of the mother trees. For example, the location of the mother trees alone could not explain the distribution pattern of the seedlings in Quercus serrata which were regenerated under the plantation of Pinus thunbergii  (Tobita et al., 1993) . Though Juglans mandshurica, a bolochory species, showed no significant departure from the independence of the alder population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(A)), this species was observed to grow close to the alders. These results led to speculation of secondary dispersal by mammals.</p><p>The horizontal spatial pattern of individuals in a plant community may reflect many factors  (Maltez-Mouro et al., 2007) and has been interpreted in terms of wide-ranging of processes, including mortality due to herbivores or pathogens, gap disturbance, competition, microhabitat variability, and limited dispersal range from adults  (Hatton, 1989) . The presence of canopy trees, regardless of N<sub>2</sub>-fixing or otherwise, will promote a change in the physical properties on the forest floor  (Maltez-Mouro et al., 2007) . In this study, we cannot determine the factors mainly affecting the distribution pattern of the regenerated plants at this alder stand. However, it was suggested that the presence of alder might promote the regeneration of woody species as one of many factors determining for the spatial distribution. It was also suggested that the N<sub>2</sub> fixation ability of the alder  (Tobita et al., 2013a)  may not only help improve soil fertility but also promote vegetative regeneration by used as roost and mother trees for these regenerated species at degraded site.</p><p>This study demonstrated only the results at one stand of A. hirsuta var. sibirica at one time. In the future research, it will be necessary to confirm the species composition and successional proceeding after several decades at this alder stand, and also to verify the facilitative effects on distribution pattern of regenerated plants at several stands with different successional stages and with different dominant Alnus species.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Regenerated woody species, in particular, endozoochory species with relatively high shade tolerance, tended to show a significant attraction to Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica. These results suggest that alder will be used for roost trees and play a role as mother trees of these regenerated endozoochory tree species at the naturally established stands of Alnus species after the soil disturbance. This study also suggested that the symbiotic N<sub>2</sub> fixation of A. hirsuta var. sibirica might affect the distribution pattern of regenerated tree species as well as improving soil fertility.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We thank Drs. Iwatsubo, Takeda, Kawaguchi, Osawa, Tokuchi, Kitayama and the members of the Laboratory of Forest Ecology, Kyoto University, for their valuable suggestions. We are also grateful to Dr. Ando and Messrs. Kurumado and Saito for their pleasant acceptance and offer of the study site and experimental office, and Dr. Tian for his help with the fieldwork. This study was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 91567, 24580230.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.53541-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Armest, J. J., Pickett, S. T. A., &amp; McDonnell, M. J. (1991). Spatial Heterogeneity during Succession: A Cyclic Model of Invasion and Exclusion. In J. Kolasa, &amp; S. T. A. Pickett (Eds.), Ecological Heterogeneity (pp. 256-269). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3062-5_13</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Baker, D. D., &amp; Schwintzer, C. R. (1990). Introduction. In C. R. Schwintzer, &amp; J. D. Tjepkema (Eds.), The biology of Frankia and Actinorhizal Plants (pp. 1-13). Tokyo: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-633210-0.50006-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Besag, J. (1977). Contribution to the Discussion on Dr. Ripley’s Paper. Journals of the Royal Statistical Society, B39, 193-195.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Callaway, R. M., &amp; Walker, L. R. (1997). Competition and Facilitation: A Synthetic Approach to Interactions in Plant Communities. Ecology, 78, 1958-1965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1958:CAFASA]2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carlson</surname><given-names> P. J.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Dawson</surname><given-names> J. O. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1985</year>)<article-title>. Soil Nitrogen Changes, Early Growth, and Response to Soil Internal Drainage of a Plantation of Alnus jorullensis in the Colombian Highlands</article-title><source> Turrialba</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 141</fpage>-<lpage>150</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapin III, F. S., Walker, L. R., Fastie, C. L., &amp; Sharman, L. C. (1994). Mechanisms of Primary Succession Following Deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecological Monographs, 64, 149-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937039</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diggle, P. J. (1983). Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Pattern (pp. 148). London: Academic Press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Enoki, T., Kawaguchi, H., &amp; Iwatsubo, G. (1997). Nutrient-Uptake and Nutrient-Use Efficiency of Pinus thunbergii Parl. along a Topographical Gradient of Soil Nutrient Availability. Ecological Research, 12, 191-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02523784</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Finegan, G. B. (1984). Forest Succession. Nature, 312, 109-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/312109a0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanley, T. A., Deal, R. L., &amp; Orlikowska, E. H. (2006). Relationships between Red Alder Composition and Understory Vegetation in Young Mixed Forests of Southeast Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 738-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x05-290</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasegawa, S., &amp; Takeda, H. (2001). Functional Specialization of Current Shoots as a Reproductive Strategy in Japanese Alder (Alnus hirsuta var. sibirica). Canadian Journal of Botany, 79, 38-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b00-143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hatton, T. J. (1989). Spatial Analysis of a Subalpine Heath Woodland. Australian Journal of Ecology, 14, 65-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1989.tb01009.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Houle, G. (1992). Spatial Relationship between Seed and Seedling Abundance and Mortality in a Deciduous Forest of North-Eastern North America. Journal of Ecology, 80, 99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261066</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hunter, A. F., &amp; Aarssen, L. W. (1988). Plants Helping Plants. BioScience, 38, 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1310644</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Johnson, R. A., Willson, M. F., Thompson, J. N., &amp; Bertin, R. I. (1985). Nutritional Values of Wild Fruits and Consumption by Migrant Birds. Journal of Ecology, 66, 819-827. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940543</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Katsuta, M., Mori, T., &amp; Yokoyama, T. (1998). Seeds of Woody Plants in Japan. Angiospermae. Tokyo: Japan Forest Tree Breeding Association. (In Japanese).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lotwick</surname><given-names> H. M.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Silverman</surname><given-names> B. W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1982</year>)<article-title>. Methods for Analysing Spatial Processes of Several Types of Points</article-title><source> Journals of the Royal Statistical Society</source><volume> 44</volume>,<fpage> 406</fpage>-<lpage>413</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maltez-Mouro</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Garcia</surname><given-names> L. V.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Maranon</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Freitas</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>. Recruitment Patterns in a Mediterranean Oak Forest: A Case Study Showing the Importance of the Spatial Component</article-title><source> Forest Science</source><volume> 53</volume>,<fpage> 645</fpage>-<lpage>652</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masaki, T., Suzuki, W., Niiyama, K., Iida, S., Tanaka, H., &amp; Nakashizuka, T. (1992). Community Structure of a Species-Rich Temperate Forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, Central Japan. Vegetatio, 98, 97-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00045549</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakanishi, H. (1996). Fruit Color and Fruit Size of Bird-Disseminated Plants in Japan. Vegetatio, 123, 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00118272</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nanami, S., Kawaguchi, H., &amp; Yamakura, T. (1999). Dioecy-Iduced Spatial Patterns of Two Codominant Tree Species. Podocarpus nagi and Neolitsea aciculata. Journal of Ecology, 87, 678-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00392.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peterson, C. J., &amp; Squiers, E. R. (1995). An Unexpected Change in Spatial Pattern across 10 Years in an Aspen-White-Pine Forest. Journal of Ecology, 83, 847-855. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2261421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ripley</surname><given-names> B. D. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1977</year>)<article-title>. Modeling Spatial Patterns</article-title><source> Journals of the Royal Statistical Society</source><volume> 39</volume>,<fpage> 172</fpage>-<lpage>212</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, E., &amp; Ambasht, R. S. (1988). Nitrogen Accretion and Its Energetics in the Himalayan Alder. Functional Ecology, 2, 229-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2389699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thomas, B. D., &amp; Bowman, W. D. (1998). Influence of N2-Fixing Trifolium on Plant Species Composition and Biomass Production in Alpine Tundra. Oecologia, 115, 26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050487</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tjepkema, J. D., Schwintzer, C. R., &amp; Benson, D. R. (1986). Physiology of Actinorhizal Nodules. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 37, 209-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.37.060186.001233</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tobita</surname><given-names> H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Enoki</surname><given-names> T.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> &amp; Kawaguchi</surname><given-names> H. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1993</year>)<article-title>. Effects of Site Conditions on Natural Regeneration in a Pinus thunbergii Plantation on Mt. Tanakami</article-title><source> Bulletin of the Kyoto University Forest</source><volume> 65</volume>,<fpage> 50</fpage>-<lpage>62</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tobita, H., Hasegawa, F. S., Komatsu, M., &amp; Kitao, M. (2013a). Growth and N2 Fixation in an Alnus hirsuta (Turcz.) var. sibirica Stand in Japan. Journal of Bioscience, 38, 761-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12038-013-9369-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tobita, H., Hasegawa, F. S., Tian, X., Nanami, S., &amp; Takeda, H. (2010). Interactive Effects of Elevated CO2, Phosphorus Deficiency, and Soil Drought on Nodulation and Nitrogenase Activity in Alnus hirsuta and Alnus maximowiczii. Symbiosis, 50, 59-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13199-009-0037-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Tobita, H., Kucho, K., &amp; Yamanaka, T. (2013b). Abiotic Factors Influencing Nitrogen-Fixing Actinorhizal Symbioses. In A. Ricardo (Ed.), Symbiotic Endophytes (pp. 103-122). New York: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39317-4_6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vitousek, P. M., &amp; Howarth, R. W. (1991). Nitrogen Limitation on Land and in the Sea: How Can It Occur? Biogeochemistry, 13, 87-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00002772</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Walker, L. W., &amp; Chapin III., F. S. (1987). Interactions among Processes Controlling Successional Change. Oikos, 50, 131-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565409</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53541-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zitzer, S. F., &amp; Dawson, J. O. (1992). Soil Properties and Actinorhizal Vegetation Influence Nodulation of Alnus glutinosa and Elaeagnus angustifolia by Frankia. Plant and Soil, 140, 197-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00010597</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>