<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2014.53020</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-43128</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  IUPAC Periodic Table Quantum Mechanics Consistent
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ernard</surname><given-names>Schaeffer</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>7, rue de l’Ambroisie 75012 Paris, France</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bschaeffer@wanadoo.fr</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>02</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>122</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>November</day>	<month>29,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>December</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>January</day>	<month>25,</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Most periodic tables of the chemical elements are between 96% and 100% in accord with quantum mechanics. Three elements only do not fit correctly into the official tables, in disagreement with the spherical harmonics and the Pauli exclusion principle. Helium, belonging to the s-block, should be placed beside hydrogen in the s-block instead of the p-block. Lutetium and lawrencium belonging to the d-block of the transition metals should not be in the f-block of the lanthanides or the actinoids. With these slight modifications, the IUPAC table becomes quantum mechanics consistent. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Periodic Table; Aufbau Principle; Exclusion Principle; Helium; Lutetium; Lawrencium; Quantum Mechanics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The purpose of this paper is to find the necessary characteristics of a consistent periodic table of quantum mechanics, neglecting electron spin, “except that we adopt the exclusion principle” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref1">1</xref>]. There is a great variety of periodic tables due to the various graphical, mathematical, physical or chemical criterions used. We shall modify slightly the official International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) table, in order to make it entirely compatible with the Schr&#246;dinger theory of the hydrogen atom. The Bohr Aufbau principle (lowest energy), Pauli exclusion principle (pairing), Hund’s rule (equal energy) and Madelung rule <img src="5-7501641\e391e441-d5f4-4d5c-bca5-5232393be039.jpg" /> are briefly discussed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Short History of the Periodic Table</title><p>The Mendeleev table is more than one century old. It was originally based on atomic masses with twelve lines and eight columns, corresponding already but partially to the blocks s, p and d of quantum mechanics. The transition metals were moved separately and the rare gases replaced the corresponding column after their discovery by Ramsay. Moseley replaced the mass with the atomic number as a classification criterion. The transuranians were discovered by Seaborg who placed the lanthanoids and actinoids separately, below the table, for reasons of compactness. In 1985 the IUPAC Commission on the Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry proposed a new notation for the groups of the periodic table where the numbering of the groups was changed from VIII groups to 18 columns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Description of the Periodic Table</title><p>The periodic table (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) has 4 blocks, the first one (<img src="5-7501641\cab4e029-cdb1-48a5-8293-e5afbfd55160.jpg" />= 0), on the left, has two columns, one corresponds to the spin up and the second to the spin down with an exception, helium He, placed with the inert gases although it has 2 electrons instead of 6 in the next period (<img src="5-7501641\f8650e05-927b-4a61-8344-d336f3fa7e6d.jpg" />= 1). The fourth period (<img src="5-7501641\d5b60265-0f9d-4dec-add8-ee89c05a0b93.jpg" />= 3) contains 10 columns with an anomaly on the first column, left. The last period (<img src="5-7501641\1295f95e-d4d3-4209-92ae-2b9471aaf04b.jpg" />= 4) corresponding to the lanthanides and actinides, has 15 columns, an uneven number.</p><p>According to the Pauli exclusion principle of quantum mechanics, all elements are coupled: the elements with even atomic numbers have an even number of electrons and uneven elements have uneven numbers of electrons.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Periodic <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>and Electronic Structure</title><p>The complete electronic structure of the atom (e.g. the hydrogen atom) is necessary to predict the physical and chemical properties of the elements. Some elements have configuration anomalies in the electronic sequence. For example chromium has the following electronic structure [Ar]4s<sup>1</sup>3d<sup>5</sup> and not the expected one, [Ar]4s<sup>2</sup>3d<sup>4</sup>. This does not change the structure of the table because copper and chromium are in the middle of the d-block. Helium, lutetium and lawrencium, being at the boundary of their blocks, it is important to analyze their position.</p><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Helium</title><p>It is well known that helium has a 1s<sup>2</sup> structure, a spherical mode of vibration, as hydrogen 1s<sup>1</sup>; the difference resides in the number of electrons: two instead of one. Helium, pertaining to the s-block of the K-Shell (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), is usually placed with the other rare gases at the right of the table where the electronic structure of the outermost subshell is np<sup>6</sup> with a maximum of six electrons instead of two for helium (1s<sup>2</sup>). Moreover, as Bartlett [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref2">2</xref>] has shown, the noble gases are not so inert. There exist compounds of xenon and krypton with fluorine, chlorine, hydrogen, platinum [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref3">3</xref>], gold [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref4">4</xref>]. There is no chemical reason any more to place helium with the other noble gases. Some authors put He in the p-block by writing the electronic structure as 1s<sup>2</sup>p<sup>0</sup>. p<sup>0</sup> has no meaning: it contains no electron. The electronic structure of He is 1s<sup>2</sup> and that’s all. The vacant box beside hydrogen waits for helium where it has its natural place.</p><p>He may be called a s-block noble gas. Its filled outer subshell s-block of valence electrons cannot appear in the p-block e.g. in column 18.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Lutetium and Lawrencium</title><p>Lutetium and lawrencium are traditionally considered to belong respectively to the lanthanoids and to the actinoids, with 15 elements each [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref3">3</xref>] instead of 14 in contradiction with the Pauli exclusion principle doubling the number of 7 spherical harmonics in the f-block. Indeed, each atom with an uneven atomic number is paired with the next atom, with an even atomic number. Lutetium (named Cassiopeium Cp by Bohr) has the structure (Xe)</p><p>4f<sup>14</sup>5d<sup>1</sup>s<sup>2</sup>, found by Bohr and Coster [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref5">5</xref>]. Having the first electron of the 5d subshell of the transition metals, it has to be in the d-block and not among the lanthanides, in the f-block.</p><p>With these changes, the Pauli exclusion principle is satisfied: the f-block, without Lu, contains an even maximum of 14 electrons. The two first rows of the d-block have each 10 elements; it should be the same for the two last rows. Indeed, lutetium and lawrencium pertain to the d-block of the transition metals with 10 elements and therefore not to the f-block of the lanthanoids. Lutetium and lawrencium may be called lanthanoid and actinoid of the d-block but cannot appear within the f-block with the 28 lanthanides and actinides. They have to be correctly placed below Sc and Y in the d-block as was shown by Bohr and co-workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref5">5</xref>]. After almost one century, this error has not yet been corrected. It is not because two persons resemble each other that they are of the same family.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Bohr Theory of the Hydrogen Atom</title><p>The Bohr theory of the hydrogen atom describes accurately the energy levels of the hydrogen atom and the Balmer series with circular trajectories of the electrons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref5">5</xref>]. The electrons move around the nucleus like planets around the sun with a supplementary condition: the angular momentum should be quantized, that is an integer multiple of the reduced Planck constant h/2π, restricting the orbits to quantum integers.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Wave Mechanics of the Hydrogen Atom</title><p>Schr&#246;dinger developed a wave equation whose solutions are standing waves similar to the standing waves in a spherical resonator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref6">6</xref>]. Born compares the hydrogen atom with a circular membrane fixed at the circumference. The number of radial nodal lines is the quantum number of the state of vibration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref7">7</xref>]. The hydrogen nucleus with its electrostatic potential may be compared to a pond limited by a slope. The waves propagate at a variable velocity, like that of a tsunami function only of the water depth. The velocity of the matter waves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref8">8</xref>] depends only on the velocity of the electron depending on the electrostatic potential, like a comet being captured by the sun if its velocity is smaller than the escape velocity. An electron approaching a proton will be captured in similar conditions. It loses energy by radiation until its angular momentum be exactly a multiple of the reduced Planck constant h. In the Schr&#246;dinger theory of the hydrogen atom, the electron emits permanently a stationary matter wave also called de Broglie wave [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref8">8</xref>]. The particle has to stay in the interference fringes of the matter wave with a probability proportional to the intensity of the wave, obtained by solving the Schr&#246;dinger equation. A stationary wave exists only for the Bohr values of the energy. The potential energy being function of the position r of the electron, the kinetic energy is the difference between the Bohr energy E<sub>n</sub> of state n and the electrostatic potential V(r).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Related Empirical Principles</title><sec id="s7_1"><title>7.1. Bohr Aufbau Principle (1921)</title><p>The Aufbauprinzip (building-up principle) postulates a hypothetical process in which an atom is progressively “built up” from its predecessor, by adding one proton and one or more neutrons to the nucleus plus one electron to the outermost free atomic orbital [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref5">5</xref>]. The Aufbau is similar to building a house, following the blueprint. The periodic table is built from the top and increasing number of electrons from left to right.</p></sec><sec id="s7_2"><title>7.2. Pauli Exclusion Principle (1925)</title><p>According to the Pauli exclusion principle, each orbital may contain one or two electrons only [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref9">9</xref>]. The electron has a magnetic moment like a tiny magnet due to its spinning electrical charge. Two opposite magnets attract themselves. A third electron is not attracted because the resulting magnetic moment of the magnets is zero. This means that the chemical elements are paired, an uneven atomic number is paired with the next one, having an even atomic number. They attract themselves when their magnetic moments are opposite, equilibrated by the centrifugal force.</p></sec><sec id="s7_3"><title>7.3. Hund’s Rule (1925)</title><p>When electrons fill orbitals of equal energies, they occupy as many different orbitals as possible. Hund’s rule [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref10">10</xref>] may be interpreted as the reverse of the exclusion principle. Indeed, when the electrons are few, their distance on their orbit is large, the repulsive electrostatic force is thus stronger than the magnetic force. Hund’s rule is useful to predict the detailed electronic configuration but has no effect on the periodic table structure.</p></sec><sec id="s7_4"><title>7.4. Madelung Rule (1926)</title><p>Also known after Janet (1927) the n + <img src="5-7501641\eb10c48a-6ee0-409c-9155-4a05a10ccb71.jpg" /> rule [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref11">11</xref>] has been explained by Klechkowski (1962). Orbitals with a lower n + <img src="5-7501641\b30834c3-0730-4a7a-8cd3-0d565dffd63a.jpg" /> value are filled before those with higher n + <img src="5-7501641\c457aa3c-0ca1-497f-9e29-a6df05b2e632.jpg" /> values. In the case of equal n + <img src="5-7501641\fd431fb8-beff-4c18-8a9d-5a0e6ff33006.jpg" /> values, the orbital with a lower n value is filled first. This is the quantitative formula corresponding to the Aufbau principle.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Suggested Updating of the Compact Periodic Table</title><p>The periodic <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, IUPAC style modified, is obtained from the spherical harmonics of  <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, combined with the Pauli exclusion principle. The drawings, modified from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.43128-ref12">12</xref>] show the spherical harmonics of the outermost orbitals of the atoms.</p><p>The vacant box beside hydrogen is now filled with helium. Lutetium and lawrencium are in the d-block below scandium and yttrium. The lanthanoids and actinoids are 14 each in the f-block as predicted by the exclusion principle and the spherical harmonics. As in most periodic tables, only the wave structure appears, not the real electronic structure of the atoms.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>9. Conclusion</title><p>There exists a large variety of periodic tables, depending on the criterions used to build them. The chemical properties are not quantifiable, and their choice is as a criterion</p><p>to build the periodic table being subjective. There are also purely mathematical arguments like symmetry criterions but their physical basis is tenuous. Most periodic tables being around 96% quantum mechanics consistent, 3 minor corrections are necessary. They consist to place hydrogen H, lutetium Lu and lawrencium Lr in their respective <img src="5-7501641\d482aa1e-1d8a-4435-94e9-857a835ac75c.jpg" />-blocks. Helium will be therefore in the s-block side by side with hydrogen. Lutetium and lawrencium have to be moved from the f-block into the d-block, below yttrium Y. It may be acceptable to call He a noble gas of the s-block, Lu and Lr, lanthanide and actinide of the d-block. The IUPAC table with these three slight corrections would be practically entirely quantum mechanics consistent. An even better presentation would place the <img src="5-7501641\815fb9c8-a394-4dda-9ff7-425f802738aa.jpg" /> = 0 elements to the right as in the Janet or left-step table [3,13].</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.43128-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. P. Feynman, M. L. Sands and R. B. Leighton, “The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Quantum Mechanics,” California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Bartlett, Proceedings of the Chemical Society, Vol. 6, 1962, p. 218.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. R. Scerri, “The Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance,” Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. K. Brisdon, Annual Reports on the Progress of Chemistry, Section A, Vol. 97, 2001, pp. 107-116.http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b104213k</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">N. Bohr, Nature, Vol. 112, 1923, pp. 29-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Schrodinger, Annalen der Physik, Vol. 79, 1926, pp. 361-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/andp.19263840404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Born, “Atomic Physics,” Dover, New York, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. de Broglie, “Annales de Physique, 10e Série, Tome III,” Janvier-Février, 1925.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. Pauli, Zeitschrift für Physik, Vol. 31, 1925, pp. 373-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02980592</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Hund, Zeitschrift für Physik, Vol. 33, 1925, pp. 345-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01328319</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Madelung, “Mathematische Hilfsmtittel des Physikers, ” 3rd Edition, Springer, Berlin,1936.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02177-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Schaeffer, “Relativités et Quanta Clarifiés,” Publibook, Paris, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.43128-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Janet, “Concordance de l’Arrangement Quantique, de Base, des électrons Planétaires des Atomes—Avec la Classification Scalariforme, Hélicoidale, des éléments Chimiques,” Imprimerie Départementale de l’Oise, Beauvais, 1930.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>