<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Air Pollution</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-2653</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojap.2013.21001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAP-29001</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Size Distributions of Atmospheric Aerosol Compositions in Saitama, Japan
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ttipol</surname><given-names>Paw-Armart</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kunio</surname><given-names>Yoshizumi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Kyoritsu Women’s University, Tokyo, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Air Quality &amp;amp; Noise Management Bureau, Bangkok, Thailand</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>yoshizumi@kyoritsu-wu.ac.jp(KY)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>03</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>6</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>15,</month>	<year>2013</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>February</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2013</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>February</day>	<month>26,</month>	<year>2013</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A survey of atmospheric aerosols in a suburban area near Tokyo, Japanwas conducted using an Andersen sampler. Significant amounts of Na
  <sup>+</sup>and Cl
  <sup>- </sup>collected were considered to be derived from sea salt. The difference between the Na
  <sup>+</sup>/Cl
  <sup>-</sup>ratio in the area and that in sea salt indicated a considerable loss of Cl
  <sup>-</sup>. This is assumed to be caused by the formation of NaNO
  <sub>3</sub>, which is one of the main nitrate species present. Most of the sulfate in the sample was found to be (NH
  <sub>4</sub>)
  <sub>2</sub>SO
  <sub>4 </sub>in the form of fine particles, which is different from the sulfate derived from sea salt and soil. The size distributions of K and Mg are also discussed in relation to particular sources.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Size Distribution; Chemical Compositions; Particulate Matter; Sulfate; Nitrate; Saitama; Japan</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Air pollutants emitted into the atmosphere from various sources can be classified as either gaseous or particulate matter (PM). These types of pollutants are closely related to each other through gas-to-particle conversion, called condensation, and particle-to-gas conversion, called evaporation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29001-ref1">1</xref>]. An aerosol can be defined as a system of solid or liquid particles suspended in an ambient environment. Aerosols, which can be manmade or occur naturally, vary in size and composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29001-ref2">2</xref>].</p><p>From the viewpoint of aerosol science, a particle is described as primary when it is emitted directly from a source into the atmosphere. On the other hand, a particle that is initially emitted as gaseous matter and then converted to PM through ambient chemical and physical processes is described as a secondary particle [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29001-ref3">3</xref>].</p><p>Understanding the behaviors of PM and the complex influences it has on human beings, animals, and plants requires analysis of size distribution, mass concentration, and chemical composition [4,5]. Size distribution and chemical composition analysis detail basic characteristics of atmospheric PM. These characteristics are closely related to the effects PM has on human health [6-8].</p><p>This study investigates the size distribution of anion species (<img src="1-2430025\955eb733-1285-47e2-b3d5-bbf75b479948.jpg" />, <img src="1-2430025\8e804204-e875-4f37-9a53-838d81cd1597.jpg" />, and Cl<sup>-</sup>) and cation species (<img src="1-2430025\1a063f47-43f8-4396-ba6f-136b093d011e.jpg" />, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, and K<sup>+</sup>) of PM in the atmosphere. The sources of the anion and cation species with respect to their contribution to ambient aerosol are discussed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling Location</title><p>Aerosols in ambient air were collected at the Center for Environmental Science at Saitama (CESS), Kazo, Saitama Prefecture, Japan. CESS is located in a suburban area surrounded by paddy fields, vegetable gardens, and roads, as illustrated by <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. An Andersen sampler was placed on the roof of the CESS air-monitoring station with an intake located approximately 4 m above ground level.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling Method</title><p>Ambient aerosols were collected continuously for one</p><p>week from October 23 to 30, 2009 using a 47 mm quartz filter and an eight-stage Andersen impactor (Model AN- 200) with a backup filter at an air flow rate of 28.3 L min<sup>−1</sup>. This system was used to obtain information on size-segregated particles and to classify particles into nine size ranges (0.08 to 30 μm). The Andersen sampler can selectively trap different sized particles according to their momentum.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Ion Composition Analysis</title><p>After ambient air was collected, the backup filter and the quartz filters from the eight stages were removed from the Andersen sampler and soaked in a controlled environment at 35˚C and 50% relative humidity for 24 h. After soaking, the PM mass concentrations of each stage were determined gravimetrically using an electronic microbalance in a temperature and humidity controlled room. An experiment was conducted to evaluate ion composition. The quartz filter from each stage was cut into a piece of a quarter (9 pieces in total). Cations and anions were extracted from the pieces of quartz filter using ultrapure water in an ultrasonic bath for 20 min. The cations (<img src="1-2430025\f13a05c3-6625-40f8-a4cf-3f1bda5cd3a1.jpg" />, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, and Mg<sup>2+</sup>) and anions (<img src="1-2430025\c77dfff1-431d-4494-ace0-5a65963c7a02.jpg" />, <img src="1-2430025\a1af2604-9f9d-4c10-882f-4e34d5cf415f.jpg" />, and Cl<sup>−</sup>) were analyzed by ion chromatography (DionexIC-20) using the following materials and conditions. Anion chromatography was performed with an AS12A column using 2.7 mM Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> and 0.3 mM NaHCO<sub>3 </sub>as eluents at 35˚C, a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min, and an injection volume of 25 &#181;L. Cation chromatography was performed with a CS12A column using 20 mM methane sulfuric acid as the eluent at 35˚C, a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min, and an injection volume of 50 &#181;L. The detection limits in millimolar were 0.003 for Na<sup>+</sup>, 0.004 for<img src="1-2430025\1634e4b5-2d3c-4752-9831-4dc83621fb6f.jpg" />, 0.004 for K<sup>+</sup>, 0.004 for Mg<sup>2+</sup>, 0.015 for Ca<sup>2+</sup>, 0.021 for Cl<sup>−</sup>, 0.028 for<img src="1-2430025\f0664206-76b5-4987-a027-50cb98a7a759.jpg" />, and 0.019 for<img src="1-2430025\6d5cc0c5-5980-4071-b75f-efcad730d5ab.jpg" />. The calibration curves of the anions and cations were determined using standard solutions. The blank filters were also extracted and analyzed for operation blanks.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Ambient PM Mass Concentration</title><p>The size distribution of PM relative to mass is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The distribution is bimodal; the fine particles peak at approximately 1 μm and the coarse particles peak at approximately 4 μm. The mass concentrations of the fine and coarse particles were 20.7 and 18.8 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The total concentration was 39.5 μg/m<sup>3</sup>, which is considered moderately polluted compared with monitoring data compiled by the Ministry of the Environment (Japan).</p><p>Typically, aerosols in the coarse particle range (&gt;2μm) originate from natural sources, while those in the fine</p><p>particle range (&lt;2 μm) are derived from anthropogenic sources [1-5]. The size distribution shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> was influenced by both natural and anthropogenic sources in the study area.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Characteristics of Nitrate, Sodium and Chlorine</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the size distributions of Na<sup>+</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, and <img src="1-2430025\e64d1688-5da2-404c-b23e-ca4cf23baede.jpg" /> at the sampling site. Cl<sup>− </sup>and <img src="1-2430025\5703ec97-a0d3-49b4-84eb-29ab844f83b8.jpg" /> were distributed bimodally with one peak in the fine particle range and another in the coarse particle range. However, Na<sup>+ </sup>appears to be distributed in a monomodal form with a peak in the coarse particle range. Sea salt contains Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup><sup> </sup>at a mole ratio of approximately 0.89 [9,10] because it is composed of species other than Na<sup>+ </sup>and Cl<sup>−</sup>. Although Saitama City is located inland, sea spray was a fairly large contributor of coarse particles. It is commonly known that coarse Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>− </sup>particles originate from sea salt. However, the mole ratio of Na<sup>+</sup> to Cl<sup>− </sup>in the sample does not coincide with that of sea salt, showing a lower than expected level of Cl<sup>−</sup>. The level of Cl<sup>− </sup>observed in this study gave a mole ratio of 3.60. This is thought to be due to sea salt particles reacting with ambient HNO<sub>3</sub> and/or NO<sub>2</sub> to form NaNO<sub>3</sub> and releasing HCl (NaCl + HNO<sub>3</sub> = NaNO<sub>3</sub> + HCl) [11,12]. Accordingly, in the coarse range, it is necessary to examine the mole ratio of Na<sup>+</sup>/(Cl<sup>− </sup>and<img src="1-2430025\8d18560e-016f-41e0-9fab-7b823358709b.jpg" />) rather than that of Na<sup>+</sup>/Cl<sup>−</sup>. The recalculated value was 0.72, which is relatively close to the expected value of 0.89. This indicates that a moderately rich Cl condition was observed. However, this appears consistent with experimental and expected values.</p><p>Moreover, a small peak of Cl<sup>−</sup><sup> </sup>was observed in the fine particle range. This peak is assumed to be derived from HCl emitted from the incineration of garbage that included polychlorinated hydrocarbons. Prior to the implementation and enforcement of strict controls, HCl emissions in Japan were significant. This study confirms that HCl remains at a noticeable level. The counter ion of Cl<sup>−</sup> is considered to be <img src="1-2430025\f2f8d680-5fd1-4364-8a7c-66ddd459e6fe.jpg" /> after the neutralization of HCl with ammonia gas in ambient air.</p><p>Nitrate can be formed as a secondary pollutant through photochemical reactions in the atmosphere [13-16]. Nitric acid may react with ammonia gas to form fine particles and may also react with NaCl to form coarse particles. In this study, nitrate is predominantly classified in the coarse particle range. Therefore, it can be concluded that NaNO<sub>3</sub> was the major species in the sample, and NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> was present in lower amounts. Moreover, NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> and NH<sub>4</sub>Cl are known to be volatile under ambient temperature [10,14].</p><p>The dominance of NaNO<sub>3 </sub>could be caused by the evaporation of NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> due to the moderate temperature (20˚C - 25˚C during the day) at the time of sample collection.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Characteristics of Sulfate, Ammonium, and Calcium</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the size distribution of atmospheric <img src="1-2430025\35808df8-9310-4787-a641-7ea7b4704895.jpg" /> and<img src="1-2430025\eecd80c2-f5ac-409d-b434-308b4bea57ed.jpg" />. <img src="1-2430025\f9e14fc6-9c86-4148-adc7-e7ddf8b43595.jpg" />shows a monomodal distribution with</p><p>a strong peak in the fine particle range accompanied by a slight shoulder in the coarse particle range. Sulfate is commonly formed by a slight shoulder in the coarse particle range. Sulfate is commonly formed by the gas-toparticle conversion of SO<sub>2 </sub>through photochemical reactions [17,18]. Thus, the main peak falls in the fine particle range. The slight shoulder in the coarse particle range could be explained if some sulfate is derived from sea salt and soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29001-ref19">19</xref>].</p><p>The monomodal size distribution of <img src="1-2430025\61ccae71-fa3a-4997-b589-46e0d5f7adca.jpg" /><sup> </sup>shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> has a sharp peak at approximately 0.5 μm, similar to that of <img src="1-2430025\d4004e11-2d42-449f-ac69-eb4f6ac619e8.jpg" /><sup> </sup>in the fine particle range. This could imply that <img src="1-2430025\4592878d-6e60-4eca-8f75-d16833485c6d.jpg" /> exists as a counter ion to<img src="1-2430025\cf952b25-ef4c-4bec-8a93-2a7d882fb74a.jpg" />. Ammonia and sulfuric acid will form ammonium sulfate or ammonium bisulfate, which are stable in ambient air and have a long life [15,20].</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> also shows the size distribution of Ca<sup>2+</sup>, which has a strong peak in the coarse particle range. Ca<sup>2+</sup> concentration was found to be at a relatively high level, next to Na<sup>+</sup>, in the coarse particle range. This may be attributed to the counter ion of sulfate in the coarse particle range because CaSO<sub>4</sub> would be derived from sea salt and soil. Calcium carbonate derived from soil could be a source of Ca<sup>2+</sup> in the coarse particle range. Previous studies have shown that Ca<sup>2+</sup> is more abundant in coarse particles during dust storms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.29001-ref21">21</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Characteristics of Magnesium and Potassium</title><p>Mg<sup>2+</sup> and K<sup>+</sup> distributions are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. The magnesium particulates are mainly derived from sea salt [9,10]. The monomodal distribution with a peak in the coarse particle range is similar to the Na<sup>+</sup> distribution shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>Some K<sup>+</sup> may be produced by the incineration of plant derivatives, such as paper, wood, and vegetable garbage, which would cause fine particle aerosols. Some studies have shown that K<sup>+ </sup>in aerosols can result from biomass burning [22,23]. Potassium can also originate from sea salt and soil and would fall into the coarse particle range. These two sources result in two size distribution peaks for atmospheric potassium, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Summarizing Characteristics of Chemical Components</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the ionic balances between the aerosol components from the Andersen sampler stages. The average ratios of total cation equivalence to total anion equivalence were calculated as 1.08 and 1.16 for coarse and fine particles, respectively. That is, a small cation</p><p>rich trend was observed; however, this is considered an acceptable coincidence between ion balances in both particle ranges. In the coarse particle range, the contribution of unevaluated carbonate ions may be a factor in the cation rich calculation. Ionic balances would be improved by evaluating organic hydrocarbon acids, which were not analyzed in the fine particle range.</p><p>The orders of the ionic compounds were <img src="1-2430025\ae16d9fa-b836-4134-b640-f29029e6b9b5.jpg" /> &gt; <img src="1-2430025\ec2a2e42-76f1-4f66-9673-ea19a9b54637.jpg" /> &gt; <img src="1-2430025\cf207069-2c85-4256-90ba-a05b20b5ab0e.jpg" /> in the fine particle range and <img src="1-2430025\3a2828ae-d086-4244-bc74-1832db9a2f52.jpg" /> &gt; <img src="1-2430025\60d3e0a1-5c33-45e4-9377-4c381ca44938.jpg" /> &gt; Na<sup>+</sup> in the coarse particle range. Sulfate was the predominant ion and occupied approximately 45% of the total mass concentration of the eight ionic compounds, followed by nitrate (22%) and ammonium (19%).</p><p>Overall, the results of this study are acceptable in comparison with those of previous research [18-23].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Size distributions of atmospheric aerosol components in a suburban area of Tokyo, Japan were investigated using an Andersen sampler.</p><p>Significant amounts of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> were considered to be derived from sea salt. The difference between the Na<sup>+</sup>/Cl<sup>− </sup>ratio in the coarse particles and that in sea salt indicated a considerable loss of Cl<sup>−</sup>. We concluded that this was caused by the formation of NaNO<sub>3</sub>, which is the main nitrate species present. Moreover, NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3 </sub>was estimated to be in the fine particle range.</p><p>The size distribution of <img src="1-2430025\2175780e-45aa-4adf-93ca-378ca9a159a7.jpg" /> had a sharp monomodal peak in the fine particle range, which is similar to that of sulfate. Most of the sulfate is considered to be ammonium sulfate or ammonium bisulfate. The size distribution of Ca was found to have a strong peak in the coarse particle range. Ca is considered to be a main counter ion of <img src="1-2430025\e8e8d8cc-820a-4112-bba4-e63f4f7f8486.jpg" /> in the coarse particle range.</p><p>Mg is considered to be derived primarily from sea salt and soil and has a peak in the coarse particle range. Some K will originate from sea salt and will also be produced by the incineration of plant derivatives. These two sources most likely caused the two peaks in the size distribution of K.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Acknowledgements</title><p>We greatly appreciate the research members of the Center for Environmental Science at Saitama for their enthusiastic supporting our research activities with respect to the collection, the analysis and the interpretation of ambient aerosols in Saitama, Japan.</p><p>This report is an outcome of the program supported by 2005 World Exposition, Aichi, Japan and implemented by International Center for Environmental Technology Transfer (ICETT). We are also thankful to their foundations.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.29001-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. A. Belis, F. Karagulian, B. R. Larsen and P. K. Hopke, “Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Ambient Particulate Matter Source Apportionment Using Receptor Models in Europe,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 69, 2013, pp. 94-108. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">E. Cuccia, D. Massabò and V. Ariola, “Size-Resolved Comprehensive Characterization of Airborne Particulate Matter,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 67, 2013, pp. 14-26. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Pietrodangelo, R. Salzano, E. Rantica and C. Perrino, “Characterisation of the Local Topsoil Contribution to Airborne Particulate Matter in the Area of Rome (Italy),” Source Profiles,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 69, 2013, pp. 1-14. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.059</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Xiu, D. Zhang, J. Chen and X. Huang, “Characterization of Major Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions in Size-Fractionated Particulate Matters in Shanghai Campus Ambient Air,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2004, pp. 227-236. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Sarwar, K. Fahey, R. Kwok and R. C. Gilliam, “Potential Impacts of two SO2 Oxidation Pathways on Regional Sulfate Concentrations-Aqueous-phase Oxidation by NO2 and Gas-phase Oxidation by Stabilized Criegee Intermediates,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 68, 2013, pp. 186-197. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. C. Rohr and R. E. Wyzga, “Attributing Health Effects to Individual Particulate Matter Constituents,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 62, 2012, pp. 130-152. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. Brunekreef and B. Forsberg, “Epidemiological Evidence of Effects of Coarse Airborne Particles on Health,” European Respiratory Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2005, pp. 309-318. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00001805</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. J. Delfino, C. Sioutas and S. Malik, “Potential Role of Ultrafine Particles in Associations between Airborne Particle Mass and Cardiovascular Health,” Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 113, No. 8, 2005, pp. 934-946. 
doi:10.1289/ehp.7938</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Yoshizumi, Y. Ishibashi, H. Garivait and M. S. Tabucanon, “Size Distributions and Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Aerosols in a Suburb of Bangkok, Thailand,” Environmental Technology, Vol. 17, No. 7, 1996, pp. 777-782. doi:10.1080/09593331708616445</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Yoshizumi and K. Asakuno, “Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosols in Chichi of the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1986, pp. 151-155. doi:10.1016/0004-6981(86)90216-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. C. Robbins, R. D. Cadle and D. L. Eckhardt, “The Conversion of Sodium Chloride to Hydrogen Chloride in the Atmosphere,” Journal of Meteorology, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1959, pp. 53-56.  
doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1959)016&lt;0053:TCOSCT&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R. A. Kotchenruther, “A Regional Assessment of Marine Vessel PM2.5Impacts in the U.S. Pacific Northwest Using a Receptor-based Source Apportionment Method,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 68, 2013, pp. 103-111. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.067</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M.-C. Cheng, C.-F. You, J. Cao and Z. Jin, “Spatial and Seasonal Variability of Water-soluble Ions in PM2.5 Aerosols in 14 Major Cities in China,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 60, 2012, pp. 182-192. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. A. Revuelta, R. M. Harrison, L. Núnez, F. J. Gomez- Moreno, M. Pujadas and B. Artínano, “Comparison of Temporal Features of Sulphate and Nitrate at Urban and Rural Sites in Spain and the UK,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 60, 2012, pp. 383-391. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. F. D. Gianini, R. Gehrig, A. Fischer, A. Ulrich, A. Wichser and C. Hueglin, “Chemical Composition of PM10 in Switzerland—An Analysis for 2008/2009 and Changes since 1998/1999,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 54, 2012, pp. 97-106. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. E. Millstein, R. A. Harley and S. V. Hering, “Weekly Cycles in Fine Particulate Nitrate,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, pp. 632-641. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">K. Anlauf, S.-M. Li, R. Leaitch and J. Brook, “Ionic Composition and Size Characteristics of Particles in the Lower Fraser Valley- Pacific 2001 Field Study,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 2662-2675. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.027</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. I. Khoder and S. K. Hassan, “Weekday/Weekend Differences in Ambient Aerosol Level and Chemical Characteristics of Water-soluble Components in the City Centre,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 42, No. 32, 2008, pp. 7483-7493. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">T. A. Pakkanen, K. Loukkola, C. H. Korhonen and M. Aurela, “Sources and Chemical Composition of Atmospheric Fine and Coarse Particles in the Helsinki Area,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 35, No. 32, 2001, pp. 5381-5391. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00307-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. K. Pandey, B. D. Tripathi, V. K. Mishra and S. K. Prajapati, “Size Fractionated Speciation of Nitrate and Sulfate Aerosols in a Sub-tropical Industrial Environment,” Chemosphere, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2006, pp. 49-57. 
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Shen, J. Cao, R. Arimoto, Z. Han, R. Zhang, Y. Han, S. Liu, T. Okuda, S. Nakaoand S. Tanaka, “Ionic Composition of TSP and PM2.5 during Dust Storms and Air Pollution Episodes at Xi’an, China,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 18, 2009, pp. 2911-2918. 
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">F. Reisen, C. P. Meyer and M. D. Keywood, “Impact of Biomass Burning Sources on Seasonal Aerosol Air Quality,” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 67, 2013, pp. 437- 447. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.29001-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">S. Pateraki, T. Maggos, J. Michopoulos, H. A. Flocas, D. N. Asimakopoulos and C. Vasilakos, “Ions Species Size Distribution in Particulate Matter Associated with VOCs and Meteorological Conditions over an Urban Region,” Chemosphere, Vol. 72, No. 3, 2008, pp. 496-503. 
doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.061</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>