<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Mathematical Finance</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2434</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmf.2013.31010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMF-28394</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Inference for Interest Rate Models Using Milstein’s Approximation
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>heodoro</surname><given-names>Koulis</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aera</surname><given-names>Thavaneswaran</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Statistics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>theo_koulis@umanitoba.ca(HK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>02</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>110</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>October</day>	<month>9,</month>	<year>2012</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>November</day>	<month>24,</month>	<year>2012</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>December</day>	<month>8,</month>	<year>2012</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   A class of martingale estimating functions based on the first two moments of the observed process provides a convenient framework for estimating the parameters of diffusion processes [1]. In the Bayesian set up, combined estimating functions had been studied for diffusion processes in [2] with filtering applications. However, when the conditional mean and the conditional variance are functions of parameters of interest in a diffusion process model, the basic martingales generating components of quadratic estimating functions are such that one is an absolute continuous function with respect to the other [3, p. 94]. Hence, the combined martingale estimating functions cannot be constructed for continuous-time diffusion processes. In this paper, a general framework for parameter estimation of discretely observed interest rate models is developed by using the Milstein approximation and closed form expressions for the information gain are also obtained. The method is used to study the estimates of the parameters for an extended version of the CoxIngersoll-Ross interest rate model.  
     
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Interest Rate Models; Combined Estimating Functions; Information; Diffusion Processes; Milstein  Approximation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Inference for discrete-time stochastic processes using estimating functions was discussed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref4">4</xref>]. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref1">1</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref5">5</xref>], estimation for semimartingales was studied using estimating functions. In addition, filtering and prediction problems were studied in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref6">6</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref2">2</xref>] using estimating functions in the Bayesian context.</p><p>The standard method of estimation for parameters in the drift coefficient of interest rate models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref7">7</xref>] involves the calculation of a likelihood ratio (Radon-Nikodym derivative) and hence the maximum likelihood estimator(s). This is less than straightforward for complicated models, and indeed it is not available at all because of the non-existence of the Radon-Nikodym derivative. The estimating function method, however, allows estimators to be obtained straightforwardly under very general conditions on the first two conditional moments [3, p. 131]. They can deal, in particular, with the situation in which the Brownian motion in a diffusion is replaced by a general square-integrable martingale as in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref1">1</xref>]. The combined estimating function approach used in this paper, based on selection of an optimal estimating function from within a specified class of martingale estimating functions, involves assumptions on the first four conditional moments of the underlying process. In most realistic situations the diffusions cannot be observed continuously, so discrete time approximation to stochastic integrals or a direct approach using the discrete time observations is required.</p><p>Recently in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref8">8</xref>], among others, the estimating functions approach was used to study the estimation problems for some discretely observed interest rate models. However, these methods involve the closed form expressions for the first four conditional moments, obtained by Ito’s approximations, and these are not available for general time-homogeneous diffusion process models and in particular for an extended CIR interest rate model.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref9">9</xref>], the asymptotic theory of the maximum likelihood estimator for diffusion models was studied, first by using Milstein’s approximation of diffusion processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref10">10</xref>], and further by approximating the conditional transition density by a normal density by ignoring the skewness and kurtosis.</p><p>In this paper, we study combined martingale estimating functions for interest rate models and show that the combined estimating functions are more informative when the conditional mean and variance of the observed process depend on the parameter of interest. This paper is organized as follows. The rest of Section 1 presents the basics of estimating functions and information associated with estimating functions for discrete-time stochastic processes. Section 2 presents combined estimating functions for discretely observed continuous-time diffusion processes based on closed form expressions for the first four conditional moments via It&#244;’s formula. In Section 3, the theory of combined estimating functions is applied to general diffusion processes.</p><p>Suppose that <img src="10-1490107\f7b0633d-1f38-4c10-a5fa-b126310e71e7.jpg" /> is a realization of a discrete-time stochastic process and its distribution depends on a vector parameter <img src="10-1490107\560c1e86-feb2-465e-977e-091c839b45e2.jpg" /> belonging to an open subset <img src="10-1490107\62b76215-d35c-41c0-a592-9e2f390f408e.jpg" />of the p-dimensional Euclidean space. Let <img src="10-1490107\bd67771f-4b0d-4fde-8231-a5bb58cd721e.jpg" /> denote the underlying probability space, and let <img src="10-1490107\b138016f-1f99-443f-a758-a8e952c95211.jpg" /> be the σ-field generated by<img src="10-1490107\b46cb709-8890-48e0-9828-f39485ad57f3.jpg" />. Let <img src="10-1490107\e22284cd-0845-458f-9e49-1f7cfd05886a.jpg" />, <img src="10-1490107\054be378-53aa-446e-a648-70b1fe68cfba.jpg" />be specified q-dimensional vectors that are martingales. We consider the class <img src="10-1490107\16ef8430-5f5b-48ca-b01e-eadb4c8ef49f.jpg" /> of zero mean and square integrable p-dimensional martingale estimating functions of the form</p><p><img src="10-1490107\de9add58-d076-424f-8aeb-c8d2a56356fd.jpg" /></p><p>where <img src="10-1490107\56017778-2eb7-491f-b628-7a05261dc006.jpg" /> are <img src="10-1490107\939ca7b3-07ad-47d4-a7f8-0416b0113786.jpg" /> matrices depending on <img src="10-1490107\af7f1c70-1e64-462e-9e44-06a15c69b56a.jpg" />,<img src="10-1490107\af45d6cb-b00c-4765-b8d0-0fbe1d4b6754.jpg" />. The estimating functions <img src="10-1490107\14074b40-cccc-4ab7-915f-db342fb043f9.jpg" /> are further assumed to be almost surely differentiable with respect to the components of θ and such that</p><p><img src="10-1490107\591098c6-f632-4dd7-a198-04547fd5649b.jpg" />and <img src="10-1490107\1b02f0fd-2358-47f5-8c76-192a2918fc9b.jpg" /> are nonsingular for all <img src="10-1490107\ab6e9e81-3b72-4544-895d-316cd2be0f0b.jpg" /> and for each<img src="10-1490107\49bc49cf-a071-4246-a874-941b9652ba8c.jpg" />. The expectations are always taken with respect to<img src="10-1490107\213facb5-b1f2-4d23-81be-c17788218d40.jpg" />. Estimators of θ can be obtained by solving the estimating equation<img src="10-1490107\34c0ae50-dc17-4582-b366-6a3d0e56e788.jpg" />. Furthermore, the <img src="10-1490107\a7b8ac70-71bd-4697-99c8-d48b7a8fec8b.jpg" /> matrix</p><p><img src="10-1490107\61490097-ccba-4dae-8957-637139aec941.jpg" />is assumed to be positive definite for all<img src="10-1490107\ce809304-9299-40a5-af37-41a250491ebb.jpg" />. Then in the class of all zero mean and square integrable martingale estimating functions<img src="10-1490107\ae6dd9f7-eec7-40d8-943d-10ee62337f2d.jpg" />, the optimal estimating function <img src="10-1490107\35754c5e-42c0-4cce-b44c-5963923df545.jpg" /> which maximizes, in the partial order of nonnegative definite matrices, the information matrix</p><p><img src="10-1490107\580ba0c6-0d8b-43b6-9d31-023afc9465db.jpg" /></p><p>is given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\c29e09c6-2e7e-42f9-8f2e-d523de97317a.jpg" /></p><p>and the corresponding optimal information reduces to</p><p><img src="10-1490107\bf4df404-5392-4fba-8f20-44ad93eafe0e.jpg" />.</p><p>The function <img src="10-1490107\e8e84875-bf7f-4ddb-85f5-e070284d7d81.jpg" /> is also called the optimal estimating function and has properties similar to those of a score function in the sense that <img src="10-1490107\1bc8cc9c-4166-4f8d-8f8c-47f25d9e20d4.jpg" /> and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\e58fb4bf-6362-4b20-885f-bbaf2b16b653.jpg" />.This is a more general result in the sense that for its validity we do not need to assume that the true underlying distribution belongs to the exponential family of distributions. Moreover, it follows from [11, p. 916] that if we solve an unbiased estimating equation <img src="10-1490107\b735d79d-f750-4f33-86c1-7e9f66b8930d.jpg" /> to get an estimator, then the asymptotic variance of theresulting estimator is the inverse of the information<img src="10-1490107\30e679de-70b4-4890-94df-57028ff17dcc.jpg" />. Hence the estimator obtained from a more informative estimating equation is asymptotically more efficient.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Combined Estimating Functions for Discretely Observed Diffusions</title><p>In this section, we discuss the discrete time results on combining estimating functions and obtain the closed form expression for the gain in information. Assume the real-valued continuous time process <img src="10-1490107\036781e5-3350-4ac7-b115-733a24c4555f.jpg" /> is recorded discretely at the time points <img src="10-1490107\9c9f257b-c8b5-417b-96c3-cf254e8bac16.jpg" />where h is the discrete interval of observations of<img src="10-1490107\2de1be54-ddde-4fe7-9ee2-c3a3b32185e6.jpg" />. Now we consider the observable discrete-time process <img src="10-1490107\70b45f97-8ad0-48c6-b05c-3e4d347bb05f.jpg" /> with conditional moments</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16934"><label>(2.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\1b5fdaaa-53c5-4bc9-9095-43d298be08a6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16935"><label>(2.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\50eb1768-f3d5-4e6b-aba7-9ded2231a742.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16936"><label>(2.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\48bf93a9-3e7a-4e00-974e-1ee8220d2523.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16937"><label>(2.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\106b60d3-dfb4-4fe4-a0d2-017604c34ff5.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="10-1490107\13aa2ba5-25e0-49f1-8e64-f1faa1398419.jpg" /> is the σ-field generated by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\26d65e99-5392-4525-917d-d798b84df78f.jpg" />. That is, we assume that the third and the forth moments of <img src="10-1490107\4c898b62-4b0d-40dd-95f2-09b366ddf650.jpg" /> do not contain any additional parameters. In order to estimate the parameter θ based on the observations<img src="10-1490107\202d007b-2756-440e-bcc5-a41277c81c69.jpg" />, we consider two classes of martingale differences</p><p><img src="10-1490107\e0714c62-1454-4f4b-abb7-3393d43daff8.jpg" />and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\04acf08f-9441-4fd9-9a3c-6634f0d32fa9.jpg" />, where the quadratic variation and covariation of <img src="10-1490107\4acd76be-c1e1-4959-bd37-61697bcdd2df.jpg" /> and <img src="10-1490107\fa72293a-9397-4c9e-94c5-e20ff9e20794.jpg" /> are <img src="10-1490107\b3e2b1d1-f07c-4dd8-9a91-c0efbb2dfee9.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\f350f5b1-b478-440b-8788-6240c89748b2.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\f4cef7f8-7c4d-4adc-b931-f6e75bc1d191.jpg" /></p><p>respectively. The optimal estimating functions based on the martingale differences <img src="10-1490107\e84b37b7-6f4c-4d33-aa30-d0aa52b2fd2d.jpg" /> and<img src="10-1490107\0d0a9da5-7e6c-4037-a66c-bf51a351c966.jpg" />, and the corresponding information are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16938"><label>(2.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\1ad7bd0e-4939-4958-b9d1-a7783306f9cf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16939"><label>(2.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\4a141fc1-e666-465a-8fc1-9caac98e8b1e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The following theorem provides optimality of the combined estimating function based on martingales <img src="10-1490107\3ee20880-0887-4ca6-bba1-9dd90299cdf1.jpg" /> and <img src="10-1490107\84ae1122-bf11-48f1-af3b-6e51092e0cf5.jpg" /> for the multi-parameter case.</p><p>Theorem 1. For a discretely observed process, in the class of all combined estimating functions of the form</p><p><img src="10-1490107\bd697ec5-23d9-4b66-975a-81193b0df052.jpg" /></p><p>(a) The optimal estimating function is given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\26ab7991-8fe1-41fe-abf7-d6cb1af5bd71.jpg" />, where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\c4eeb0fc-d4ca-4138-aed8-7b4be969acc3.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\32cf4d17-817a-4468-87a6-01b14b4fd50c.jpg" /></p><p>(b) the information <img src="10-1490107\cf9c6adb-b634-4c45-ac02-6f64191ce7cd.jpg" /> is given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\5277dafb-ccd9-411e-99dc-78c44e839232.jpg" /></p><p>(c) the gain in information <img src="10-1490107\da8a90c6-15bf-4fc2-937f-7970ba565b2e.jpg" />is given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\96dae075-d19b-492d-85ae-4535283a2792.jpg" /></p><p>Example 1 (Combined Estimating Functions for CoxIngersoll-Ross Model). Recently there has been a growing interest in studying inference for interest rate models. In most realistic situations, the diffusion cannot be observed continuously, so discrete time approximations to stochastic integrals or a direct approach using discrete time observations is required. As a concrete illustration of the methodology, we shall discuss the estimation for the Cox, Ingersoll and Ross [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref12">12</xref>] short-term interest rate model of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16940"><label>(2.7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\f356be6f-1b2a-4365-a141-ec59dd7c38fd.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with<img src="10-1490107\38a3fa24-2f4c-4098-b568-17c99d7adcfd.jpg" />, <img src="10-1490107\d5909858-2ff2-493c-b464-04d5a15be724.jpg" />, <img src="10-1490107\60f96b82-3aca-4cf8-bd3f-352e72600cd7.jpg" />, <img src="10-1490107\918b449a-6fd6-4551-bc76-bf0985a8a6e2.jpg" />and <img src="10-1490107\bdfda12e-3bac-4a57-8b0b-e3af1b9f91bd.jpg" /> is the standard Brownian motion. The unknown parameters of interest are<img src="10-1490107\46eb471b-724f-48df-a46a-64cd9a2ad605.jpg" />. Let</p><p><img src="10-1490107\a47c40b2-0a82-474d-8082-8af5a6d89fbf.jpg" />. It is of interest to note that in this example we can obtain the closed form expressions for the first four conditional moments by using It&#244;’s formula for<img src="10-1490107\e2ac26d0-ffb2-49d4-bed8-d285c8e25a84.jpg" />,<img src="10-1490107\a39818b5-1425-4317-bbfe-b0583e87c459.jpg" />.The first four conditional moments of yth are calculated as (see Appendix A for the details):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16941"><label>(2.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\fbdb8763-65e3-4350-831d-d7ebb930917a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16942"><label>(2.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\01f18e27-e672-4adb-bac1-3ec45846020e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16943"><label>(2.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\dccf0096-dcdb-460f-a115-d103f1ebde2d.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\14c35107-748b-497a-aaff-bd52a0e5cb81.jpg" /></p><p>(2.11)</p><p>Then based on the discretely observed observations <img src="10-1490107\83f128d3-9a89-4318-9b8f-dd7e47b35a80.jpg" /> the martingale differences are</p><p><img src="10-1490107\5d5cf8a2-abfa-41bc-8906-1951e9a2b8d9.jpg" />, and <img src="10-1490107\2c905e5a-cee4-434b-a48f-fff182def724.jpg" /> Also,</p><p><img src="10-1490107\d6999592-a3eb-4674-a6cd-d41d7646ed63.jpg" />and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\9c89f3de-1db1-4e0c-bf82-f994a8d1cb75.jpg" />The derivatives are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16944"><label>(2.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\67e570f6-542c-441c-867d-3569d45e6f8e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><img src="10-1490107\258b4cf5-71e8-4455-b7a6-324588958b54.jpg" /></p><p>(2.13)</p><p>Hence, the optimal estimating functions based on the martingale differences <img src="10-1490107\07c91fc8-9071-4b4a-b0d6-f9d4b73a7d4f.jpg" /> and the corresponding information matrix are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16945"><label>(2.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\64ade671-9ffb-4fa0-9620-8090590630b3.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\8e592b48-8b13-4af9-a9b2-5d998e3d5ab1.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\9848173b-00b1-4f21-8ba4-916870be735e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\941dabe2-2f16-4deb-ab22-99388c91e14b.jpg" /></p><p>Similarly, the optimal estimating functions based on the martingale differences <img src="10-1490107\7291d9bd-8b00-48fc-b8cf-43fba8c976ce.jpg" /> and the corresponding information matrix are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16946"><label>(2.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\47b72c5e-eb16-4720-ab86-0ccc1bdc9af6.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\feea76a2-4a0b-400a-b93d-54b1ba76f0a8.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\00ab4cc5-225d-4378-a51a-a59018834f56.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\8d14b554-25a8-47c0-9379-1703029979be.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\daed59ab-35b6-4b72-8a7b-3c5efc745b80.jpg" /><img src="10-1490107\50914f9f-dfac-47aa-8cf6-2df0a3a8aa18.jpg" /><img src="10-1490107\0561f132-962b-4581-aa36-a2befc54edda.jpg" /></p><p>The optimal combined estimating function using <img src="10-1490107\21bd7c85-2411-4a13-bac6-70f32fa832fa.jpg" /> and <img src="10-1490107\b36b36d8-5811-455e-a874-9cef50e2ad5d.jpg" /> is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16947"><label>(2.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\7da9cd3f-4171-477a-912a-6bbde816d87b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\f7ac3c05-af40-4a7a-99ae-c13e7acfdc1d.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\1df8a415-0b83-4fae-ae34-1d2abbecfe2b.jpg" /></p><p>Further, let <img src="10-1490107\7f401cdf-9369-461f-9398-badc2099a25d.jpg" /> be the matrix</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16948"><label>(2.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\717cb070-853f-457e-9db1-0bf848b906a1.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\64012ac6-0646-42a7-8a90-1b2bbfbe31a6.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\15cc6f7f-f4db-41c3-9456-c27ddad76114.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\bb61bf36-9be1-4d6b-9664-c949517b0601.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\a45507b8-6ef6-4535-96c8-d8fbe926ea66.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\460804b8-c36c-4a96-851b-8fc6eb7ea638.jpg" /></p><p>The information associated with the optimal combined estimating function is</p><p><img src="10-1490107\ead46ee5-bb43-4c5b-9188-e664ebde875a.jpg" /></p><p>Note: If we allow η in (2.7) to be a function of k, then the estimating function <img src="10-1490107\26ec78ee-9913-4e3a-a38b-5b93c6eecf50.jpg" /> and the combined estimating function <img src="10-1490107\60eb7743-af34-45dc-887d-4a7b868ac632.jpg" /> become intractable.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Combined Estimating Functions for General Models</title><p>For extended versions of the CIR model, closed form expressions for the first four conditional moments cannot be obtained easily by using It&#244;’s formula, as was done for the CIR model. Recently, the Milstein’s approximation was used in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref9">9</xref>] to obtain the first two conditional moments of the diffusion. In this section, we use Milstein’s approximation to obtain the first four conditional moments and construct the optimal estimating functions.</p><p>Consider the diffusion process given by the time-homogeneous stochastic differential equation of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16949"><label>(3.1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\72b8f650-09ca-4c8a-aac1-b21558d40b3b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Where a and b are the drift and diffusion functions, respectively, and <img src="10-1490107\094e8296-025d-4257-981e-e7389b07f24f.jpg" /> is the standard Brownian motion.</p><p>A special case of (3.1) is the Brownian motion with constant drift and diffusion:</p><p><img src="10-1490107\80ec9ffb-51c2-4dc1-9f9b-7a5e97888e54.jpg" /></p><p>where<img src="10-1490107\b1514533-2672-472c-bc04-f5ed6fa3409f.jpg" />. In this case, the conditional distribution of <img src="10-1490107\9dc067d1-4449-49ca-a9ac-772d847500b2.jpg" /> given <img src="10-1490107\191c30ca-8f02-4e18-b01c-01dd9913c05b.jpg" /> is a normal with mean <img src="10-1490107\c386eb30-7964-459a-862a-34c0376cb2f9.jpg" /> and variance<img src="10-1490107\57d18f00-80a6-458b-84a9-0de0daa45d8e.jpg" />. If we consider the geometric Brownian motion given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\6a9a2333-7ba4-438e-85cb-3db56a5c8f11.jpg" /></p><p>with<img src="10-1490107\a0bf496d-0672-4dc1-8a18-9994be958f7a.jpg" />, then <img src="10-1490107\7c1608a5-526d-442f-b895-46227a4e8ed3.jpg" /> becomes a Brownian motion with drift with <img src="10-1490107\1ed58fca-47bf-4aee-b734-204a077f9a6d.jpg" /> and<img src="10-1490107\c0e22dd7-d927-4fcf-be61-4f150c66f3d9.jpg" />. In this case, the conditional distribution of <img src="10-1490107\2596eb9c-bed5-48a8-b27a-dc982e46d7e2.jpg" /> given <img src="10-1490107\4db4eb45-63e6-4540-8796-970a09b527b6.jpg" /> is also normal. The CIR process can be re-parameterized to the following form:</p><p><img src="10-1490107\242d03f3-3a85-4c56-bce4-d9b822266299.jpg" /></p><p>In this case, we have computed the first four conditional moments of the process to use in an estimating function framework. Extended versions of the CIR process model have been proposed for modeling interest rate processes. For example, some consider the constant elasticity of variance process of the form</p><p><img src="10-1490107\d97086be-62e8-4d2d-b287-74d3e0a20b03.jpg" /></p><p>or the nonlinear drift diffusion process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref13">13</xref>] given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\0eadaa3d-6411-4a04-97ff-29757ba69fde.jpg" /></p><p>For more general extended models, the diffusion is a function of the observation y<sub>t</sub> and hence, closed form expressions of the conditional distributions, as well as closed form expressions for the conditional moments cannot be easily obtained by solving differential equations obtained by repeated application It&#244;’s formula. However, Milstein’s approximation can be used to obtain the first four conditional moments.</p><p>Milstein’s approximation applied to (3.1) produces</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16950"><label>(3.2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\6c3aa0a3-6029-4cf6-a707-15babf912630.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="10-1490107\af9f58cd-6624-47ef-94b6-f08be0a7824a.jpg" /> and<img src="10-1490107\e3b560b2-1fca-4207-b915-52655dff58ef.jpg" />, i.i.d. Unlike the Euler approximation for diffusion processes, the Milstein approximation does not yield a conditional normal distribution for <img src="10-1490107\bc8b967e-e584-4de3-841f-a1db7e83ee5a.jpg" /> The distribution implied by the Milstein approximation is a mixture of a normal and chisquare distributions. By using (3.2), the first four conditional moments of <img src="10-1490107\67874510-3bad-48e4-beff-f310217d553a.jpg" /> given <img src="10-1490107\cccc0472-ab92-4955-b6c8-81723fbb69fd.jpg" /> are approximated by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16951"><label>(3.3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\3ac0aed8-4818-44e0-9890-701c916c1eaf.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16952"><label>(3.4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\f0d2975d-85f3-4f64-bc14-130549e70ab0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16953"><label>(3.5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\c1ab988c-6344-4a2c-81f5-9e6aaffdab2b.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16954"><label>(3.6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\a00c107d-c23d-44cc-99b7-b011da89a3d7.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then based on the discretely observed observations <img src="10-1490107\2785d5b7-f5f6-4ad2-85e8-c3386d1224e0.jpg" /> the martingale differences are <img src="10-1490107\36e4bbe0-2ae9-44fb-9e6d-04ab2eb6f220.jpg" />, and<img src="10-1490107\0c61ab20-e98d-460e-a11b-a1a2699e5d73.jpg" />. In this case, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16955"><label>(3.8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\9d23e538-5866-471a-b737-3d1ce0142496.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16956"><label>(3.9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\0c88e5b1-c43f-407e-b4f5-69c19e67a03e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16957"><label>(3.10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\69d60fe7-1212-4407-8b2e-fa8cb4115b78.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In addition, if we let<img src="10-1490107\b072e06a-8f10-426c-a648-d8a5385d5c78.jpg" />, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16958"><label>(3.11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\7c621f70-efd0-4824-9414-ba110f3e2851.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The optimal estimating functions based on the martingale differences <img src="10-1490107\7805cdc9-2503-4c3a-8f6e-d8e33cd39f05.jpg" /> and<img src="10-1490107\d4ba8d57-fbe8-4bdd-a249-ab23e14cce2b.jpg" />, and the corresponding information are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16959"><label>(3.12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\df16aeba-22fb-4605-9f4e-d3387b4973fb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16960"><label>(3.13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\019fe5af-fdd5-45cb-91a0-0cc927715982.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The combined estimating function and the corresponding information follow from Theorem 1 by taking<img src="10-1490107\d8b1c4b8-99ab-4c87-a90c-806a387bd05f.jpg" />.</p><p>Example 2 (NLD Process).The nonlinear drift (NLD) diffusion process for modeling interest rates was introduced in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.28394-ref13">13</xref>]. Here we consider the following NLD</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16961"><label>(3.14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\9c385393-af38-46e3-bc10-ce86979d017c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<img src="10-1490107\86e4e2f3-7cc0-4e56-b521-2a575d4a67bf.jpg" />, <img src="10-1490107\74138331-7687-483a-a016-13038bf09147.jpg" />, <img src="10-1490107\727d2ec2-27c9-4bb6-b22d-ba9b82e39642.jpg" />, and<img src="10-1490107\f4d8b434-11ab-4008-943b-68af0db9b877.jpg" />. These parameter ranges are chosen to guarantee a positive recurrent solution to the SDE. For this process,</p><p><img src="10-1490107\45756977-204d-4fdc-806a-1746a29f8fda.jpg" />,<img src="10-1490107\cdb3dfdb-1938-431b-ac2d-7f4184aa5785.jpg" /> , and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\86d2f80d-55d0-46e1-85d7-ba2efd67bfea.jpg" />. The Milstein approximation gives the following discretized version of the process:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16962"><label>(3.15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\0a23053e-e8a7-4c64-b051-a6db0c3dcd2a.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this case, we have the following for the first four conditional moments of the discretized process:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16963"><label>(3.16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\d524054d-3838-4384-838d-b49c9a2d5308.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16964"><label>(3.17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\9cd95656-c725-4059-9f44-395616d5612f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16965"><label>(3.18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\56d0d688-7786-4510-862d-02acdac2584c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16966"><label>(3.19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\34ae432c-e3d2-4989-b138-f1609f292f88.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The estimating function and corresponding information based on <img src="10-1490107\27e4432d-aa38-45e5-8724-9b6f5497d1a2.jpg" /> are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16967"><label>(3.20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\8de65bc5-839c-46f1-b65a-0fa59e1de1eb.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\bd63445f-cb7d-470c-956a-d86b2a86ae20.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\aea095b5-14d3-4a4c-bfd9-464f2193b05e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\bce31c75-c06e-4639-8819-e00c1aa89128.jpg" /></p><p>Moreover, the estimating function and corresponding information based on M<sub>t</sub> are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.28394-formula16968"><label>(3.21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="10-1490107\89dffe86-f96f-4176-8c20-9367ce40eb3e.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\e23ff75b-9217-456b-98d6-98d2cf2ecd57.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\6179ed97-de6c-4844-973c-1d8ac06eb9e5.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\ab92fafc-063e-4bfd-a10b-c121de71a785.jpg" /></p><p>In this case, <img src="10-1490107\3ae8849a-2432-425b-9b1c-7dd6aa6dc2cf.jpg" />and the optimal combined estimating function using <img src="10-1490107\d002ba74-05b4-40c6-9af6-c5e986e1c617.jpg" /> and <img src="10-1490107\04fc451f-1545-40f0-af20-ed76d25dc33d.jpg" /> is given by<img src="10-1490107\60c1ac9c-e71b-42c0-9bd9-4268e8b95e88.jpg" />, where</p><p><img src="10-1490107\28b2b6ce-dbbe-4f0d-9659-5114cb12e8e2.jpg" /></p><p>with</p><p><img src="10-1490107\86572f6c-e249-42e6-a4b5-8eac15c5eb49.jpg" /></p><p>and</p><p><img src="10-1490107\a7bbd5ef-213d-41b4-b17d-f19ef828ec40.jpg" /></p><p>The information for the combined estimating function</p><p><img src="10-1490107\bfdef0f8-40ae-42a2-9da5-9f8269d51d46.jpg" />is given by</p><p><img src="10-1490107\bdac636f-c9e5-4409-8bf7-0d3f46d5594a.jpg" /></p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>For discretely observed general interest rate models, the combined estimating function method allows estimators to be obtained straightforwardly under very general conditions on the first four conditional moments. In this paper, we have studied inference for interest rate models, first by using the Milstein approximation, and then combining estimating functions using martingale differences and have obtained the closed form expression for the information gain.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Moments of the CIR Process</title><p>The first four conditional moments of the CIR process</p><p><img src="10-1490107\87e3f61b-8a18-49db-8eba-20241dcc7d39.jpg" /></p><p>may be obtained by using It&#244;’s formula on successive powers of the process. This gives</p><p><img src="10-1490107\857c713c-51ca-411f-ba12-fca64ae658e7.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\ab0e5c88-d1c5-447f-81c7-68a6e0f20059.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\cbb815f3-15de-4ff6-b0ef-11f070d3ed26.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\6b3b6e5f-94a4-4cde-95a0-4b941c912591.jpg" /></p><p>with <img src="10-1490107\3897a374-9c41-4e17-ba91-c587ba9be040.jpg" /> as an initial condition. We let</p><p><img src="10-1490107\b999dd08-4a5b-4723-ae53-2758023eea72.jpg" />, so that the first four conditional moments of <img src="10-1490107\ba8a119e-6526-430a-adeb-f6004a28909f.jpg" /> satisfy the following differential equations:</p><p><img src="10-1490107\56668d7d-18ab-4c99-aa03-b1c0b527bd99.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\7f2bbfbe-e79d-44bf-9097-a35d95f946e2.jpg" /><img src="10-1490107\4f839e8c-f540-4b58-abea-3cae5a3dd54a.jpg" /><img src="10-1490107\3dac849c-c679-466c-9352-220742dcb831.jpg" /></p><p>with initial conditions<img src="10-1490107\9e0b8324-57fc-4901-866b-b264fc6e98bd.jpg" />,<img src="10-1490107\73bc1f1d-eb54-401e-a8e7-fadb05e26e90.jpg" /> , <img src="10-1490107\9dbaacf9-47b5-46c3-acc5-801b66fdd325.jpg" />, and<img src="10-1490107\2e9a5521-7863-4791-9cbc-a1edb3c45586.jpg" />. Solving the differential equations in turn yields:</p><p><img src="10-1490107\071207bd-def3-4815-8a1b-0df82327a41b.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\3a73d023-7bb8-4b15-a618-b8ad5d36d6b6.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\d5d86392-4ef2-458d-9cd8-5faec5bbdc5a.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\65cb0fce-ab5d-4060-bf46-47e0fa24f409.jpg" /></p><p>Hence, the first four conditional centered moments are given as</p><p><img src="10-1490107\9de140c2-3985-461f-9fb2-087c92aa9d3e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\2fbefe42-0d9f-4622-917e-5baf0002c61e.jpg" /></p><p><img src="10-1490107\77bfeda7-4fdb-48b9-be9f-54f23ae62330.jpg" /></p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.28394-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Thavaneswaran and M. E. Thompson, “Optimal Estimation for Semimartingales,” Journal of Applied Probability, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1986, pp. 409-417. 
doi:10.2307/3214183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Thavaneswaran and M. E. Thompson, “A Criterion for Filtering in Semimartingale Models,” Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1988, pp. 259-265. doi:10.1016/0304-4149(88)90099-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">C. Heyde, “Quasi-Likelihood and Its Application: A Ge- neral Approach to Optimal Parameter Estimation,” Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, 1997. doi:10.1007/b98823</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">V. P. Godambe, “The Foundations of Finite Sample Estimation in Stochastic Processes,” Biometrika, Vol. 72, No. 2, 1985, pp. 419-428. doi:10.1093/biomet/72.2.419</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. E. Hutton and P. I. Nelson, “Quasilikelihood Estimation for Semimartingales,” Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1986, pp. 245-257. 
doi:10.1016/0304-4149(86)90004-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">U. V. Naik-Nimbalkar and M. B. Rajarshi, “Filtering and Smoothing via Estimating Functions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 90, No. 429, 1995, pp. 301-306. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476513</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Paseka, T. Koulis and A. Thavaneswaran, “Interest Rate Models,” Journal of Mathematical Finance, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2012, pp. 141-158. doi:10.4236/jmf.2012.22016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Thavaneswaran, Y. Liang and N. Ravishanker, “Inference for Diffusion Processes Using Combined Estimating Functions,” Sri Lankan Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 12, 2011, pp. 145-160.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Jeong and J. Y. Park, “Asymptotic Theory of Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Diffusion Model,” Working Paper, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">O. Elerian, “A Note on the Existence of a Closed form Conditional Transition Density for the Milstein Scheme,” Economics Discussion Paper 1998-W18, Nuffield College, Oxford, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. G. Lindsay, “Using Empirical Partially Bayes Inference for Increased Efficiency,” The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1985, pp. 914-931. 
doi:10.1214/aos/1176349646</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">J. C. Cox, J. E. Ingersoll Jr. and S. A. Ross, “A Theory of the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Econometrica, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1985, pp. 385-407. doi:10.2307/1911242</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.28394-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Y. Ait-Sahalia, “Testing Continuous-Time Models of The Spot Interest Rate,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 1996, pp. 385-426. doi:10.1093/rfs/9.2.385</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>