<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.4" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">cs</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Circuits and Systems</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2153-1293</issn>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">2153-1285</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cs.2026.175005</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">cs-153670</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>Computer Science</subject>
          <subject>Communications</subject>
          <subject>Engineering</subject>
          <subject>Physics</subject>
          <subject>Mathematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Comprehensive Assessment of Large-Scale Photovoltaic Integration in an Isolated Mining Microgrid: Dynamic Stability, Protection Coordination, and Power Quality Analysis</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0002-9935-3721</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Kazadi</surname>
            <given-names>Medhy Kayembe</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5126-7985</contrib-id>
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Babakidi</surname>
            <given-names>Narcisse Meni</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label> Department of Electrical Engineering, Institut Supérieur des Techniques Appliquées, Kolwezi, Democratic Republic of the Congo </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn-conflict">
          <p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>23</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>17</volume>
      <issue>05</issue>
      <fpage>83</fpage>
      <lpage>114</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>27</day>
          <month>04</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>26</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="published">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2026 by the authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access">
          <license-p> This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link> ). </license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="doi" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4236/cs.2026.175005">https://doi.org/10.4236/cs.2026.175005</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The decarbonization of isolated mining operations has accelerated the adoption of large-scale photovoltaic (PV) generation as a sustainable alternative to diesel-based electricity production. However, high PV penetration in isolated microgrids introduces significant technical challenges, including reduced system inertia, voltage and frequency instability, protection coordination, fault-current variation, and power quality degradation. This study presents a comprehensive technical assessment of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic power plant into the isolated electrical network of the Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD) gold mine in Guinea using ETAP Version 22.5. A high-fidelity digital model of the mining power system was developed, incorporating diesel generators, medium-voltage distribution networks, transformers, industrial loads, photovoltaic generation, advanced inverter controls, protection systems, and an optional Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). Five representative operating scenarios were investigated through load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, harmonic, and renewable intermittency analyses to evaluate the operational performance of the proposed hybrid diesel-PV microgrid. Simulation results demonstrate that the integration of the 15 MW PV plant substantially reduces diesel generation while maintaining acceptable voltage regulation, frequency stability, rotor-angle stability, protection selectivity, and harmonic distortion within the limits specified by IEEE 519. The implementation of advanced inverter control functions and BESS-based fast frequency response further enhances voltage support, improves frequency recovery following disturbances, mitigates renewable intermittency, and increases the overall resilience of the isolated microgrid. The study confirms that large-scale photovoltaic integration can be achieved without compromising system reliability, operational security, or power quality when supported by appropriate control strategies and protection coordination. The proposed ETAP-based assessment framework provides a practical and reproducible engineering methodology for the planning, design, and implementation of renewable-powered isolated mining microgrids, contributing to the decarbonization and sustainable electrification of remote mining operations.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-generated" xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Photovoltaic Integration</kwd>
        <kwd>Isolated Mining Microgrid</kwd>
        <kwd>ETAP</kwd>
        <kwd>Dynamic Stability</kwd>
        <kwd>Protection Coordination</kwd>
        <kwd>Power Quality</kwd>
        <kwd>Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)</kwd>
        <kwd>Renewable Energy</kwd>
        <kwd>Mining Electrification</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The global mining industry is undergoing a profound energy transition driven by the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy security, and achieve long-term operational sustainability. Many remote mining operations continue to rely on isolated diesel-powered microgrids, where fuel transportation, high operating costs, and carbon emissions represent significant economic and environmental challenges. Consequently, the integration of renewable energy technologies, particularly large-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems, has emerged as an attractive solution for reducing diesel dependency while supporting corporate decarbonization strategies and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) objectives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>].</p>
      <p>Among the available renewable technologies, utility-scale photovoltaic generation is particularly well suited to mining applications because of its declining installation costs, modular architecture, low maintenance requirements, and high solar resource availability in many mining regions. However, integrating inverter-based PV generation into isolated industrial power systems introduces several technical challenges. Unlike conventional synchronous generators, photovoltaic systems contribute little rotational inertia and provide limited fault current, thereby affecting voltage regulation, frequency stability, transient performance, protection coordination, and power quality. These challenges become increasingly significant in mining microgrids supplying large induction motors, variable-speed drives (VSDs), crushers, pumps, ventilation systems, conveyors, and other highly dynamic industrial loads. Maintaining reliable operation under high renewable penetration therefore requires coordinated control of inverter-based resources, optimized protection schemes, and, where appropriate, Battery Energy Storage Systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>].</p>
      <p>Although renewable energy integration has been extensively investigated over the past decade, most published studies focus on utility distribution networks, generic islanded microgrids, or simplified academic test systems. Existing research frequently examines individual technical aspects such as voltage regulation, frequency stability, economic optimisation, or harmonic mitigation without simultaneously evaluating the complex interactions among power flow, transient stability, protection coordination, short-circuit performance, and power quality in a real industrial mining environment. Furthermore, comprehensive engineering studies involving large-scale photovoltaic integration (15 MW or greater) within isolated African mining microgrids remain scarce, limiting the availability of practical design guidance for mining operators and power system engineers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>].</p>
      <p>To address this gap, this paper presents a comprehensive technical assessment of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic power plant into the isolated electrical network of the Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD) gold mine in Guinea. A high-fidelity digital model of the existing diesel-powered microgrid was developed using ETAP Version 22.5 to represent the complete electrical infrastructure, including diesel generators, transformers, medium-voltage distribution networks, industrial loads, protection systems, photovoltaic generation, and an optional Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). Comprehensive simulation studies were subsequently performed to evaluate load-flow performance, transient stability, frequency response, short-circuit behavior, protection coordination, harmonic distortion, and renewable intermittency under representative operating conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">8</xref>].</p>
      <p>The principal contribution of this research is the development of an integrated ETAP-based assessment framework for evaluating large-scale renewable energy integration in isolated mining power systems. Unlike previous studies that focus on individual performance criteria, the proposed methodology simultaneously investigates steady-state operation, dynamic behaviour, protection performance, and power quality within a single validated industrial simulation model. The study demonstrates that high photovoltaic penetration can substantially reduce diesel generation while maintaining electrical stability, operational reliability, protection selectivity, and compliance with internationally recognized engineering standards through the application of advanced inverter control strategies and BESS support [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>].</p>
      <p>The findings provide both scientific and practical contributions by offering a reproducible engineering methodology for the planning, design, optimisation, and implementation of renewable-powered mining microgrids. The proposed framework serves as a valuable reference for mining companies, utilities, consultants, and researchers involved in the electrification and decarbonization of isolated industrial power systems, particularly in Africa and other remote regions pursuing high renewable energy penetration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec2">
      <title>2. Literature Review</title>
      <sec id="sec2dot1">
        <title>2.1. Renewable Energy Integration in Isolated Mining Microgrids</title>
        <p>The mining sector is increasingly adopting renewable energy technologies to reduce diesel dependency, operating costs, greenhouse gas emissions, and improve long-term energy sustainability. Among the available renewable sources, large-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems have emerged as the preferred solution for isolated mining operations because of declining installation costs, high conversion efficiency, low maintenance requirements, and abundant solar resources. Hybrid diesel-PV microgrids have demonstrated significant reductions in fuel consumption while enhancing environmental performance and supporting corporate decarbonization and ESG objectives [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>].</p>
        <p>Despite these benefits, integrating inverter-based PV generation into isolated mining power systems presents considerable technical challenges. Unlike conventional synchronous generators, photovoltaic systems provide limited rotational inertia and fault current contribution, fundamentally altering power system dynamics. High PV penetration can therefore affect voltage regulation, frequency stability, transient performance, protection coordination, and power quality, particularly in mining networks characterized by large motor loads, variable-speed drives, and rapidly changing industrial demand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>]. </p>
        <p>Consequently, advanced inverter control strategies, adaptive protection schemes, and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) have become essential for maintaining reliable and secure operation. ETAP has emerged as one of the most widely adopted simulation platforms for evaluating these challenges through integrated load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, harmonic, and protection coordination analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec2dot2">
        <title>2.2. Research Gap and Contribution</title>
        <p>Although substantial research has been conducted on renewable energy integration, most published studies focus on utility distribution systems, generic microgrids, or simplified academic models. Existing investigations typically examine isolated technical aspects such as voltage regulation, frequency stability, economic optimization, or harmonic performance without simultaneously assessing the complex interactions between power flow, dynamic stability, protection coordination, fault performance, and power quality in real industrial environments. Furthermore, comprehensive studies involving large-scale photovoltaic integration (≥15 MW) in isolated African mining microgrids remain scarce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
        <p>To address these limitations, this research develops a high-fidelity ETAP-based assessment framework for the isolated electrical network of the Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD), a gold mine in Guinea. The proposed methodology integrates steady-state load-flow analysis, transient stability, short-circuit studies, frequency response, harmonic analysis, protection coordination, advanced inverter control strategies, and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) evaluation within a single simulation environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>].</p>
        <p>Unlike previous studies, this work provides a comprehensive engineering assessment based on a real industrial mining power system, offering practical guidance for the planning, design, optimization, and implementation of reliable, safe, and sustainable renewable-powered mining microgrids. The proposed framework contributes both to the academic literature and to industrial practice by providing a reproducible methodology for evaluating large-scale renewable integration in isolated mining power systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec3">
      <title>3. Research Methodology</title>
      <sec id="sec3dot1">
        <title>3.1. Research Design</title>
        <p>This study employed a quantitative engineering methodology based on computer-aided power system modelling and simulation to evaluate the technical feasibility of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant into the isolated electrical network of the Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD), Guinea. The analysis was performed using ETAP Version 22.5, enabling comprehensive steady-state and dynamic assessments of the existing diesel-based microgrid under different renewable penetration scenarios.</p>
        <p>A simulation-based approach was selected because it provides a safe and reliable environment for investigating system behavior without interrupting mining operations. The study adopted a Before-After assessment framework, whereby the existing diesel power system was first modelled and validated before progressively introducing photovoltaic generation and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) support. This approach enabled direct comparison of network performance before and after renewable integration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot2">
        <title>3.2. Research Framework</title>
        <p>The research methodology was structured into six sequential phases to ensure a systematic and reproducible assessment of the proposed hybrid diesel-PV microgrid:</p>
        <p>1) Data Collection: Relevant electrical and operational data were collected, including single-line diagrams, generator and transformer characteristics, cable parameters, protection settings, load profiles, and photovoltaic plant specifications. </p>
        <p>2) ETAP Network Modelling: A detailed digital model of the SMD electrical network was developed in ETAP, incorporating equipment parameters, load allocation, protection devices, and the validated network topology. </p>
        <p>3) Base-Case Validation: The diesel-only model was validated using load-flow results, bus voltage profiles, generator and transformer loading, power factor, network losses, and short-circuit levels to confirm consistency with existing operating conditions.</p>
        <p>4) Photovoltaic and BESS Integration: A 15 MW grid-following photovoltaic plant was integrated into the model with advanced inverter functions, including Volt/VAR control, frequency support, ramp-rate limitation, fault ride-through capability, and optional Battery Energy Storage System modelling. </p>
        <p>5) Simulation Studies: The hybrid system was evaluated through load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, harmonic, and renewable intermittency analyses under representative operating scenarios. </p>
        <p>6) Performance Evaluation: The diesel-only and hybrid diesel-PV configurations were comparatively assessed using technical performance indicators, leading to engineering recommendations for reliable and practical implementation. </p>
        <p>This structured framework enables a comprehensive evaluation of steady-state performance, dynamic stability, protection behavior, and power quality within a single validated simulation environment.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot3">
        <title>3.3. Study Area</title>
        <p>The study was conducted on the isolated electrical network of Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD), a Nordgold gold mining operation located in Guinea. The electrical configuration of the SMD isolated mining network is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
        <fig id="fig1">
          <label>Figure 1</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7601522-rId16.jpeg?20260904020906" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 1</bold><bold>.</bold> General electrical power distribution network of the SMD mining plant.</p>
        <p>The power system operates independently of the national grid and comprises diesel generating units operating at 6.6 kV, a 22 kV distribution network, power transformers, industrial substations, low- and medium-voltage motor control centres (MCCs), underground electrical distribution systems, and critical mining process loads.</p>
        <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the existing UG power plant comprises five diesel generator sets with a combined installed capacity of 12.5 MVA, configured as follows:</p>
        <p>Three (3) Mitsubishi prime-rated diesel generators, each rated at 2.5 MVA, 6.6 kV, 50 Hz, operating as the primary base-load generation units.Two (2) Teksan standby diesel generators, each rated at 2.5 MVA, 400 V, 50 Hz, connected to the 6.6 kV distribution system through dedicated 400 V/6.6kV step-up transformers. These units provide backup generation capacity during maintenance, contingency events, or periods of increased system demand.</p>
        <p>The total installed diesel generation capacity is 12.5 MVA, corresponding to approximately 10 MW of active power at a nominal power factor of 0.8. During all ETAP simulations, diesel generator dispatch was constrained within the installed capacity of the online generators. The operating configuration adopted for each simulation case is summarized in <bold>Table 1</bold>.</p>
        <p>The ETAP simulations were performed using four operating configurations. The base case represents the existing diesel-only microgrid, while the remaining cases evaluate the progressive integration of a 15 MW photovoltaic power plant, advanced Volt/VAR control, and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS)-based Fast Frequency Response (FFR). These operating configurations were used consistently across the different load-flow, transient stability, protection coordination, and power quality analyses.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 1</bold><bold>.</bold> Operating configuration used in ETAP simulations.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl1">
          <label>Table 1</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>Simulation case</td>
                <td>Online diesel units</td>
                <td>Installed genset (MVA)</td>
                <td>PV output (MW)</td>
                <td>Operating mode</td>
                <td>BESS</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Case 1 (base case)</td>
                <td>3 × Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>0</td>
                <td>Diesel-only</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Case 2</td>
                <td>3 × Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>Diesel + PV</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Case 3</td>
                <td>3 × Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>Diesel + PV with Volt/VAR control</td>
                <td>No</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Case 4</td>
                <td>3 × Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>7.5</td>
                <td>15</td>
                <td>Diesel + PV + Fast frequency response (FFR)</td>
                <td>Yes (BESS)</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The proposed renewable energy system consists of a 15 MW utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) power plant will be integrated into the existing 6.6 kV underground (UG) power plant distribution network, forming a hybrid diesel-photovoltaic microgrid. The PV plant is connected to the main 6.6 kV busbar through an appropriately rated step-up transformer, allowing seamless integration with the existing power generation infrastructure while ensuring compliance with system voltage and protection requirements.</p>
        <p>The operating conditions presented in <bold>Table 2</bold> were consistently applied across all simulation scenarios to ensure a fair comparison. The system load was maintained at approximately 8 MW, with three Mitsubishi diesel generators operating online. A minimum diesel loading of 30% and a 15% spinning reserve were maintained to ensure stable islanded operation. For the BESS scenario, a 5 MW/10MWh battery with an initial 60% state of charge (SOC) was modelled to provide Fast Frequency Response (FFR). Steady-state analyses were based on converged load-flow solutions, while transient simulations were performed over a 30-second duration to capture the dynamic response of the hybrid microgrid.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 2.</bold> Operating conditions used for ETAP simulation scenarios.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl2">
          <label>Table 2</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Case</bold>
                  <bold>1</bold>
                  <bold>diesel</bold>
                  <bold>only</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Case</bold>
                  <bold>2</bold>
                  <bold>diesel</bold>
                  <bold>+</bold>
                  <bold>PV</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Case</bold>
                  <bold>3</bold>
                  <bold>diesel</bold>
                  <bold>+</bold>
                  <bold>PV</bold>
                  <bold>+</bold>
                  <bold>Volt/VAR</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Case</bold>
                  <bold>4</bold>
                  <bold>diesel</bold>
                  <bold>+</bold>
                  <bold>PV</bold>
                  <bold>+</bold>
                  <bold>BESS</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Total system load</td>
                <td>8.0 MW</td>
                <td>8.0 MW</td>
                <td>8.0 MW</td>
                <td>8.0 MW</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Online diesel generators</td>
                <td>3 × 2.5 MVA Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>3 × 2.5 MVA Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>3 × 2.5 MVA Mitsubishi</td>
                <td>3 × 2.5 MVA Mitsubishi</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Available diesel capacity</td>
                <td>7.5 MVA</td>
                <td>7.5 MVA</td>
                <td>7.5 MVA</td>
                <td>7.5 MVA</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>PV output</td>
                <td>0 MW</td>
                <td>15 MW</td>
                <td>15 MW</td>
                <td>15 MW</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Minimum diesel loading</td>
                <td>30% of rated output per unit</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
                <td>0.3</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Required spinning reserve</td>
                <td>15% of total system load</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BESS rated power</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>5 MW</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>BESS energy capacity</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>10 MWh</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Initial BESS State of Charge</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>0.6</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Simulation duration (Load Flow)</td>
                <td>Steady-state</td>
                <td>Steady-state</td>
                <td>Steady-state</td>
                <td>Steady-state</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Simulation duration (Dynamic)</td>
                <td>30 s</td>
                <td>30 s</td>
                <td>30 s</td>
                <td>30 s</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot4">
        <title>3.4. ETAP Model Development</title>
        <p>A comprehensive digital twin of the mining power system was developed using ETAP Version 22.5. The developed ETAP model of the SMD isolated mining microgrid is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The model incorporated all major electrical components, including diesel generators, power transformers, medium-voltage switchgear, overhead lines, underground cable networks, induction motors, variable frequency drives (VFDs), photovoltaic generation, Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), protection relays, circuit breakers, busbars, and feeders. Equipment parameters were derived from manufacturer technical documentation, engineering design data, and operational records obtained from the mine. Model validation was performed by comparing simulated operating conditions with measured system performance under normal operating conditions, confirming that the digital model accurately represents the actual electrical network prior to photovoltaic integration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>].</p>
        <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the ETAP model accurately represents the complete electrical topology of the SMD isolated mining power system, including the diesel generating units, medium-voltage distribution network, transformers, industrial loads, photovoltaic generation, Battery Energy Storage System (BESS), and protection devices. This validated digital model served as the basis for all subsequent load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, and harmonic analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig2">
          <label>Figure 2</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7601522-rId17.jpeg?20260904020907" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 2</bold><bold>.</bold> ETAP digital model.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot5">
        <title>3.5. Photovoltaic and Battery Energy Storage System Modelling</title>
        <p>The photovoltaic plant was modelled as a 15 MW grid-following inverter-based generation system connected to the medium-voltage network. The inverter model incorporated active and reactive power control, Volt/VAR regulation, frequency droop characteristics, ramp-rate limitation, low-voltage ride-through (LVRT), high-voltage ride-through (HVRT), and fault-current limitation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>].</p>
        <p>As shown in <bold>Table 3</bold>, the selected modelling parameters were established in accordance with inverter manufacturer recommendations, IEEE 1547, IEC 61727, and ETAP modelling practices to ensure realistic steady-state, transient stability, protection, and power quality simulations. These parameters provide a representative framework for evaluating the dynamic behavior and grid integration performance of the proposed 15 MW photovoltaic power plant within the isolated SMD hybrid diesel-PV microgrid.</p>
        <p>To evaluate enhanced operational flexibility, selected simulation scenarios included a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) providing frequency support, synthetic inertia, active power balancing, renewable intermittency mitigation, voltage support, and ramp-rate control.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Reference parameters of the 15 MW photovoltaic power plant (Modeling assumptions).</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl3">
          <label>Table 3</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Recommended</bold>
                  <bold>value</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Brief</bold>
                  <bold>technical</bold>
                  <bold>comment</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Maximum active power</td>
                <td>15 MWac</td>
                <td>Net power at PCC</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Inverter apparent power</td>
                <td>≥16.5 MVA</td>
                <td>Supports P and Q</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Connection voltage</td>
                <td>6.6 kV, 50 Hz</td>
                <td>Step-up transformer</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Inverter type</td>
                <td>Grid-following with PLL</td>
                <td>Grid synchronized</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Nominal power factor</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>Adjustable</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Power factor range</td>
                <td>0.95 leading to 0.95 lagging</td>
                <td>Inverter limited</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Reactive power capability</td>
                <td>±5 MVAr</td>
                <td>Voltage support</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Main reactive control</td>
                <td>Volt/VAR or PCC voltage control</td>
                <td>Voltage regulation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Normal control priority</td>
                <td>Active-power priority</td>
                <td>Maximizes PV output</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fault control priority</td>
                <td>Reactive-current priority</td>
                <td>Fault support</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Voltage reference</td>
                <td>1.00 p.u.</td>
                <td>PCC setpoint</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Frequency-power droop</td>
                <td>0.04</td>
                <td>Frequency regulation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Frequency deadband</td>
                <td>±0.10 Hz</td>
                <td>Avoids unnecessary response</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fault-current limit</td>
                <td>1.2 p.u.</td>
                <td>Current limited</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Voltage-control response time</td>
                <td>≤100 ms</td>
                <td>Fast response</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Frequency-control response time</td>
                <td>100 - 200 ms</td>
                <td>Dynamic control</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Normal ramp-rate limit</td>
                <td>10% of rated power/min</td>
                <td>Power smoothing</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Severe transient ramp scenario</td>
                <td>0.5 - 2 MW/s</td>
                <td>Disturbance case</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Continuous voltage range</td>
                <td>0.95 - 1.05 p.u.</td>
                <td>Normal operation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Temporary voltage ride-through range</td>
                <td>0.85 - 1.10 p.u.</td>
                <td>Fault ride-through</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Normal frequency range</td>
                <td>49 - 51 Hz</td>
                <td>Continuous operation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Extreme study range</td>
                <td>47.5 - 52 Hz</td>
                <td>Protection study</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Voltage and frequency ride-through</td>
                <td>Defined UVRT/OVRT curves</td>
                <td>Grid-code compliant</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Harmonic voltage limit at PCC</td>
                <td>THDv ≤ 5%</td>
                <td>Power quality</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Recommended transformer rating</td>
                <td>16.5 - 18 MVA</td>
                <td>Operating margin</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Transformer impedance</td>
                <td>6% - 8%</td>
                <td>Fault limitation</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Grid-forming</bold>
                  <bold>source</bold>
                </td>
                <td>Three Mitsubishi diesel generators</td>
                <td>Provides the voltage and frequency reference during islanded operation.</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The proposed 15 MW PV plant was modelled as a grid-following inverter synchronized to the diesel-powered microgrid through a Phase-Locked Loop (PLL). The three online Mitsubishi synchronous diesel generators operated in grid-forming mode, establishing the voltage reference through their Automatic Voltage Regulators (AVRs) and regulating system frequency through governor-based droop control. The PV inverter supplied active power and Volt/VAR-based reactive power support while maintaining synchronization with the diesel-generated voltage. In the BESS scenario, the battery provided Fast Frequency Response (FFR) and synthetic inertia through rapid active power injection or absorption in response to frequency deviations and RoCoF. However, the BESS remained coordinated with the diesel generators, which served as the primary grid-forming sources throughout all simulation scenarios, ensuring stable voltage and frequency regulation during both steady-state and transient operation.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot6">
        <title>3.6. Simulation Study Design and Assessment Scope</title>
        <p>Five representative operating scenarios were investigated:</p>
        <p>Load-Flow Analysis: Evaluation of bus voltage profiles, active and reactive power flow, equipment loading, network losses, and power factor.Dynamic Stability Analysis: Assessment of frequency response, voltage recovery, rotor angle stability, diesel generator dynamics, and renewable power fluctuations. Short-Circuit and Protection Coordination: Analysis of fault currents, relay operating times, breaker coordination, and protection selectivity.Harmonic Analysis: Evaluation of voltage and current harmonic distortion, harmonic spectrum, resonance conditions, and filter performance.Renewable Intermittency Analysis: Investigation of sudden photovoltaic output reductions, frequency recovery, BESS response, and diesel governor performance under variable solar conditions. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot7">
        <title>3.7. Technical Performance Indicators and Evaluation Criteria</title>
        <p>The technical performance of the hybrid power system was evaluated using internationally recognised electrical performance indicators, including bus voltage magnitude, active and reactive power flow, system frequency, Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF), rotor angle stability, short-circuit current, relay operating time, total harmonic distortion (THDv and THDi), power factor, diesel fuel displacement, and renewable penetration level.</p>
        <p>Comparative analyses between the reference diesel network and the hybrid diesel-PV system was conducted to quantify the operational benefits and technical impacts of photovoltaic integration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot8">
        <title>3.8. Standards and Validation</title>
        <p>All simulations and engineering assessments were conducted in accordance with internationally recognised standards, including IEC 60909, IEC 61000, IEEE 519, IEEE 1547, IEC 60034, IEC 60255, and IEC 61850. Adherence to these standards ensures methodological consistency, technical reliability, and reproducibility for similar isolated mining microgrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec3dot9">
        <title>3.9. Research Workflow</title>
        <p>The research followed a systematic workflow comprising data collection, ETAP model development, base-case validation, photovoltaic (PV) and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) integration, simulation studies, performance evaluation, and the formulation of engineering recommendations. </p>
        <p>The ETAP model was first developed and validated using actual operating data before introducing the proposed 15 MW PV power plant and BESS. Comprehensive simulations, including load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, harmonic, and renewable intermittency analyses, were subsequently performed to assess the technical performance of the hybrid microgrid. </p>
        <p>This structured methodology provides a reproducible engineering framework for evaluating renewable energy integration into isolated mining power systems while ensuring electrical stability, operational reliability, protection coordination, power quality, and compliance with international engineering standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec4">
      <title>4. ETAP Model and Study System</title>
      <sec id="sec4dot1">
        <title>4.1. Study System Overview</title>
        <p>The study was conducted on the isolated electrical network of the Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD), a Nordgold mining operation in Guinea. The mine operates as a standalone microgrid powered by diesel generators, supplying industrial loads through 22 kV and 6.6 kV distribution networks. A 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant was proposed for integration into the existing system to reduce diesel fuel consumption while maintaining network reliability. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot2">
        <title>4.2. Existing Electrical Network</title>
        <p>The configuration of the existing SMD electrical network is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The mine operates as an isolated diesel-powered microgrid designed to supply continuous electrical power to critical mining and processing facilities. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the network comprises diesel generating units operating at 6.6 kV, interconnected through a 22 kV overhead distribution system, 22/6.6 kV power transformers, medium-voltage switchgear, underground and surface cable networks, industrial substations, and medium- and low-voltage motor control centers (MCCs). </p>
        <p>The electrical system supplies a wide range of mining process loads, including SAG mills, crushers, pumps, ventilation fans, conveyors, and auxiliary services, all of which exhibit varying load characteristics and require a high level of operational reliability. The combination of large rotating machines, power electronic drives, and continuously varying industrial loads makes the network representative of a complex isolated mining microgrid and provides an appropriate platform for evaluating the integration of large-scale photovoltaic generation and Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot3">
        <title>4.3. ETAP Digital Model</title>
        <p>A detailed digital twin of the SMD electrical network was developed using ETAP Version 22.5 to accurately represent the configuration of the isolated mining microgrid shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The corresponding ETAP implementation of the network is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p>
        <p>The digital model incorporates all major electrical components of the existing power system, including diesel generators, power transformers, 22 kV overhead distribution lines, underground and surface cable networks, medium-voltage switchgear, industrial induction motors, variable frequency drives (VFDs), protection relays, circuit breakers, busbars, feeders, the proposed 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant, and the optional Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). Equipment ratings, electrical characteristics, protection settings, and operational parameters were derived from manufacturer technical documentation, engineering design data, and operational records obtained from the mine to ensure an accurate representation of the actual network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">25</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>].</p>
        <p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the validated ETAP model served as the foundation for all load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, and harmonic analyses performed in this study.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot4">
        <title>4.4. Equipment Modelling</title>
        <p>The principal electrical components of the SMD hybrid diesel-PV microgrid were modelled in ETAP using detailed electrical and dynamic parameters to accurately represent their steady-state and transient operating characteristics. Diesel generators were represented by synchronous machine models incorporating governor and Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) controls to simulate active power dispatch, frequency regulation, and voltage response under varying operating conditions. Power transformers were modelled using their rated capacity, voltage ratio, vector group, leakage impedance, winding losses, and on-load tap changer settings to ensure accurate voltage transformation and power-flow calculations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">28</xref>].</p>
        <p>Overhead transmission lines and underground cable networks were represented using conductor electrical characteristics, installation configurations, and positive- and zero-sequence impedance parameters to accurately simulate power transfer, voltage drop, fault current levels, and network losses. Industrial loads, including major mining equipment such as SAG mills, crushers, pumps, ventilation fans, and conveyors, were modelled as dynamic induction motor loads to capture their starting characteristics, transient behavior, and reactive power demand. This detailed equipment modelling enabled realistic simulation of both normal operating conditions and network disturbances, thereby providing a reliable basis for load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, and harmonic analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">26</xref>].</p>
        <p>The protection settings presented in <bold>Table 4</bold> were adopted as representative ETAP coordination settings for the 6.6 kV network. Phase and earth-fault protection were implemented using IEC Standard Inverse characteristics in accordance with IEC 60255-151. The settings were selected to maintain adequate sensitivity to feeder faults while preserving discrimination between normal loading, downstream faults, and upstream backup protection. Final field implementation would require verification against the approved SMD protection coordination study, equipment short-circuit withstand ratings, and manufacturer relay setting files.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Representative protection settings adopted in the ETAP study.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl4">
          <label>Table 4</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Proposed</bold>
                  <bold>value</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Relay type</td>
                <td>CPN500M/CPN500L</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Overcurrent characteristic</td>
                <td>IEC Standard Inverse</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Phase overcurrent pickup, 51P</td>
                <td>0.80 A secondary (160 A primary)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Earth-fault pickup, 51N</td>
                <td>0.20 A secondary (40 A primary)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Instantaneous phase element, 50P</td>
                <td>8.0 A secondary (1600 A primary)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Instantaneous earth-fault element, 50N</td>
                <td>2.0 A secondary (400 A primary)</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Time Multiplier Setting, 51P</td>
                <td>0.1</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Time Multiplier Setting, 51N</td>
                <td>0.08</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Breaker opening time</td>
                <td>200 ms</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>System frequency</td>
                <td>50 Hz</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot5">
        <title>4.5. Model Validation</title>
        <p>The ETAP digital model was validated against the existing diesel-only operating conditions before introducing the proposed photovoltaic (PV) generation system. Validation was performed by comparing simulated results with actual operating data and engineering design information obtained from the SMD electrical network, including bus voltage profiles, generator loading, transformer loading, active and reactive power flows, and network losses. These validation parameters were selected because they represent the principal steady-state performance indicators of the isolated mining power system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">27</xref>].</p>
        <p>To quantitatively assess the fidelity of the developed ETAP model, the base-case load-flow results were compared with the available SMD field measurements and operating reference data. The mine provided instantaneous transformer-loading measurements for the existing electrical network, while nominal bus voltages and generator ratings were obtained from the plant engineering documentation. Where active and reactive power measurements were not separately available, these quantities were reconstructed from the measured apparent power using the operating power factor of 0.85 adopted in the system study. The percentage deviation between the reference and ETAP values was calculated as:</p>
        <p><bold>Deviation</bold><bold>(%)</bold><bold>=</bold><bold>{(Reference</bold><bold>−</bold><bold>ETAP)/Reference}</bold><bold>×</bold><bold>100</bold><bold>(</bold><bold>1)</bold></p>
        <p>As shown in <bold>Table 5</bold>, the developed ETAP model demonstrates satisfactory agreement with the available plant operating data. The directly measured transformer-loading deviations range from approximately 1.23% to 9.48%, while the principal bus-voltage deviations remain below 4%. The reconstructed reactive-power flow differs by approximately 2.81%, whereas the active-power-flow deviation is approximately 12.16%. The comparatively larger active-power deviation is attributable to the instantaneous nature of the field measurements and to modelling assumptions required for loads that were unavailable or operating at very low levels during the site measurement campaign. The ETAP power balance further indicates approximately 27 kW of active network losses for the evaluated existing OHL section. Overall, the comparison confirms that the model reproduces the principal voltage profile, equipment loading, generator dispatch, and power-flow characteristics with sufficient engineering fidelity for the subsequent photovoltaic integration studies.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 5</bold><bold>.</bold> quantitative validation of the ETAP base-case model.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl5">
          <label>Table 5</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Validation</bold>
                  <bold>parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Reference</bold>
                  <bold>basis</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Measured</bold>
                  <bold>/</bold>
                  <bold>Reference</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>ETAP</bold>
                  <bold>simulation</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Deviation</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Main 6.6 kV bus voltage</td>
                <td>Nominal operating value</td>
                <td>6.60 kV</td>
                <td>6.70 kV</td>
                <td>0.0152</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Existing OHL 22 kV bus voltage</td>
                <td>Nominal operating value</td>
                <td>22.00 kV</td>
                <td>22.80 kV</td>
                <td>0.0364</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Existing 6.6/22 kV OHL transformer loading</td>
                <td>Field measurement</td>
                <td>2881 kVA</td>
                <td>2608 kVA</td>
                <td>0.0948</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Base Vie transformer loading</td>
                <td>Field measurement</td>
                <td>547.5 kVA</td>
                <td>568 kVA</td>
                <td>0.0374</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>UG Office transformer loading</td>
                <td>Field measurement</td>
                <td>65.2 kVA</td>
                <td>66 kVA</td>
                <td>0.0123</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Existing OHL active power flow</td>
                <td>Derived from measured 2881 kVA, PF = 0.85</td>
                <td>2448.9 kW</td>
                <td>2151 kW</td>
                <td>0.1216</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Existing OHL reactive power flow</td>
                <td>Derived from measured 2881 kVA, PF = 0.85</td>
                <td>1517.7 kvar</td>
                <td>1475 kvar</td>
                <td>0.0281</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>UG generator output</td>
                <td>Rated/operating reference</td>
                <td>2.00 MW</td>
                <td>1.784 MW</td>
                <td>0.108</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Existing OHL active network losses</td>
                <td>ETAP power balance</td>
                <td>—</td>
                <td>≈27 kW</td>
                <td>N/A</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>For model acceptance, the ETAP simulation was considered adequately validated when the deviation between the simulated and available plant operating data remained within engineering tolerances adopted for industrial power-system studies. Bus-voltage deviations below 5%, transformer-loading deviations below 10%, and active/reactive power-flow deviations below 15% were considered acceptable. As shown in <bold>Table 1</bold>, all validation parameters satisfied these acceptance criteria, confirming that the developed ETAP model accurately reproduces the steady-state operating characteristics of the existing SMD electrical network and provides a reliable basis for subsequent renewable integration studies.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec4dot6">
        <title>4.6. Simulation Assumptions</title>
        <p>To ensure consistency, repeatability, and realistic representation of the isolated mining microgrid, all ETAP simulations were performed under a common set of engineering assumptions. The electrical network was assumed to operate under balanced three-phase conditions with all equipment functioning within its rated operating limits. System frequency and nominal bus voltages were maintained at 50 Hz and their respective rated values unless disturbed during dynamic simulation scenarios [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">29</xref>].</p>
        <p>Unless otherwise specified, all transient and protection studies were performed using the operating conditions summarized in <bold>Table 2</bold>. The Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) was modelled with a rated power of 5 MW, an energy capacity of 10 MWh, and an initial State of Charge (SOC) of 60%. The photovoltaic plant was represented as a grid-following inverter operating under active-power priority with Volt/VAR control, while the three online Mitsubishi synchronous diesel generators remained the grid-forming sources providing voltage and frequency reference throughout all simulations.</p>
        <p>The proposed 15 MW photovoltaic power plant was modelled under standard operating conditions using the inverter parameters presented in <bold>Table 1</bold>, while advanced inverter control functions including active power control, Volt/VAR regulation, frequency droop response, low-voltage ride-through (LVRT), high-voltage ride-through (HVRT), and fault-current limitation were implemented where applicable. Unless otherwise specified for individual study scenarios, the existing protection relay settings, transformer tap positions, and network topology remained unchanged to provide a consistent basis for comparing the diesel-only and hybrid diesel-PV operating conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">30</xref>].</p>
        <p>All electrical calculations were performed in accordance with internationally recognized engineering standards, including IEC 60909 for short-circuit analysis, IEEE 519 for harmonic assessment, IEEE 1547 for distributed energy resource interconnection, IEC 61000 for power quality evaluation, and IEC 60255 for protection system performance. These assumptions ensure that the simulation results are technically consistent, reproducible, and representative of the operating characteristics of a real isolated mining microgrid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec5">
      <title>5. Simulation Results and Analysis</title>
      <sec id="sec5dot1">
        <title>5.1. Simulation Strategy</title>
        <p>Comprehensive steady-state and dynamic simulations were performed using ETAP Version 22.5 to evaluate the technical performance of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant into the isolated SMD mining microgrid. A comparative Before-After assessment methodology was adopted, whereby the existing diesel-only network was first validated and subsequently analyzed following the integration of photovoltaic generation, advanced inverter control functions, and an optional Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). The simulation program comprised load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, harmonic, and renewable intermittency analyses to evaluate system performance under representative operating conditions. All studies were conducted in accordance with relevant IEC and IEEE standards to ensure the technical reliability, reproducibility, and practical applicability of the results [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">31</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>].</p>
        <p>Unless otherwise stated, all simulation results presented in Sections 5.2 - 5.6 were obtained using the operating conditions summarized in <bold>Table 2</bold>, ensuring a consistent basis for comparing the diesel-only, diesel-PV, diesel-PV with Volt/VAR control, and diesel-PV-BESS operating scenarios.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot2">
        <title>5.2. Load Flow Analysis</title>
        <p>The load-flow simulation results evaluate the steady-state performance of the proposed 15 MW PV integration into the isolated SMD mining microgrid. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1-5</xref> compare the diesel-only and hybrid diesel-PV operating conditions, highlighting the effects of PV integration on power factor, voltage profile, active and reactive power flow, and diesel generator loading. The results provide a comprehensive assessment of the technical benefits of photovoltaic integration under normal operating conditions. Three operating cases were analysed: diesel-only, diesel + 15 MW PV, and diesel + PV with Volt/VAR control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig3">
          <label>Figure 3</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7601522-rId18.jpeg?20260904020916" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 3</bold><bold>.</bold> Load flow performance of the hybrid diesel-PV microgrid.</p>
        <p>Load flow simulations were performed using ETAP to evaluate the steady-state performance of the isolated SMD/Nordgold power system under three operating scenarios: the diesel-only base case, the integration of a 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant, and PV operation with Volt/VAR control. The results demonstrate that PV integration significantly enhances the electrical performance of the mining network by improving the power factor at critical buses, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(a)</xref>, improving voltage regulation, reducing active and reactive power flows through upstream network components, and optimizing diesel generator dispatch. In the diesel-only configuration, bus voltages progressively decrease from the 22 kV main bus to the 6.6 kV and 0.4 kV distribution levels due to the high reactive power demand of large motor-driven loads, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(b)</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <p>The addition of the 15 MW PV plant increases voltage levels by approximately 2% - 3%, while the implementation of Volt/VAR control maintains bus voltages close to the recommended operating range through effective local reactive power support (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(b)</xref>). Simultaneously, the PV plant reduces active power transfer through the main transformer, 22 kV overhead line, and downstream feeders (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(c)</xref>), while a corresponding reduction in reactive power flow is observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(d)</xref>. These effects contribute to lower diesel generator loading, reduced network losses, and improved overall power factor, particularly at the medium-voltage buses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(a)</xref>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>].</p>
        <p>The load-flow results indicate a progressive reduction in diesel generator output as photovoltaic generation increases, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3(e)</xref>. In all simulation cases, the dispatched diesel generation remained within the installed capacity of the online generating units while maintaining the required spinning reserve for stable isolated microgrid operation.</p>
        <p>Overall, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figures 3(a)-(e)</xref> demonstrate that integrating a 15 MW PV plant with advanced inverter-based reactive power control substantially improves the steady-state efficiency, voltage performance, power factor, and operational reliability of the isolated mining power system while reducing upstream power transfer, diesel generation, fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and operating costs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot3">
        <title>5.3. Transient Stability Analysis</title>
        <p>Throughout all transient simulations, the synchronous diesel generators remained the primary grid-forming sources, while the photovoltaic inverter and optional BESS operated in coordinated grid-following mode. Consequently, voltage and frequency regulation were established by the diesel generator AVRs and governors, whereas the PV inverter supplied active and reactive power and the BESS provided supplementary Fast Frequency Response (FFR) and synthetic inertia during transient disturbances.</p>
        <p>Transient stability simulations were conducted to evaluate the dynamic response of the proposed 15 MW PV-integrated diesel microgrid under representative disturbance scenarios. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1-5</xref> illustrate the system response in terms of rotor angle oscillations, system frequency, generator load sharing, PCC voltage recovery, and frequency response with and without Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) support. The results demonstrate the ability of the hybrid microgrid to maintain synchronism, rapidly restore voltage and frequency, effectively balance generation following PV power variations, and ensure stable and reliable operation under islanded conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">33</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">34</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig4">
          <label>Figure 4</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7601522-rId19.jpeg?20260904020917" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 4</bold><bold>.</bold> Transient stability performance of the hybrid diesel-PV microgrid.</p>
        <p>Transient stability simulations were performed using ETAP to evaluate the dynamic response of the isolated SMD/Nordgold diesel-PV power system following severe disturbances, including islanding events, sudden PV power fluctuations, and generation-load imbalances. The analysis assessed rotor angle stability, system frequency, generator load sharing, PCC voltage recovery, and the effectiveness of fast frequency response (FFR) support. Following the disturbance, the synchronous diesel generators exhibited damped rotor angle oscillations without loss of synchronism, confirming satisfactory electromechanical stability, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(a)</xref>.</p>
        <p>System frequency experienced a temporary decline but subsequently recovered toward its nominal operating value through governor action, demonstrating adequate system inertia and spinning reserve, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(b)</xref>. During PV power reduction, the diesel generators automatically increased their output through droop control, achieving stable load sharing and a new operating equilibrium without unstable oscillations, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(c)</xref>. Similarly, the PCC voltage underwent a transient dip followed by damped oscillations before stabilizing close to 1 p.u., indicating effective automatic voltage regulator (AVR) performance and robust voltage regulation, as presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(d)</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">35</xref>].</p>
        <p>Comparative frequency response analysis further showed that integrating a 15 MW PV plant increases frequency deviations due to reduced system inertia; however, the implementation of Fast Frequency Response (FFR) through synthetic inertia or a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) significantly improves the frequency nadir, accelerates damping, and shortens the recovery time, as demonstrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4(e)</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
        <p>Overall, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figures 4(a)-(e)</xref> demonstrate that the proposed diesel-PV hybrid system maintains satisfactory transient stability under the simulated disturbances, while the addition of FFR/BESS substantially enhances the dynamic performance and operational security of the isolated mining power network.</p>
        <p>To provide a quantitative assessment of the transient performance of the proposed hybrid diesel-PV microgrid, the principal dynamic response indicators obtained from the ETAP simulations are summarized in <bold>Table 6</bold>. The reported parameters include the disturbance type, disturbance magnitude, fault location, fault-clearing time, frequency nadir, Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF), minimum PCC voltage, maximum rotor-angle deviation, and settling time. These numerical results provide a reproducible basis for evaluating system stability under representative operating disturbances.</p>
        <p>To complement the qualitative discussion, the principal transient-performance indices obtained from the ETAP simulations are summarized in <bold>Table 6</bold>. These numerical results quantify the dynamic response of the hybrid diesel-PV microgrid under the investigated disturbance scenarios and provide a reproducible engineering basis for evaluating system stability. The investigated disturbances included a sudden 10 MW photovoltaic generation loss at the 6.6 kV Point of Common Coupling (PCC) and a three-phase short circuit applied at the PCC, cleared after 200 ms by the protection system.</p>
        <p><bold>Table 6</bold>. Quantitative transient-performance results for the investigated disturbances.</p>
        <table-wrap id="tbl6">
          <label>Table 6</label>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td>
                  <bold>Parameter</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Sudden</bold>
                  <bold>PV</bold>
                  <bold>loss</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>Three-phase</bold>
                  <bold>fault</bold>
                </td>
                <td>
                  <bold>PV</bold>
                  <bold>loss</bold>
                  <bold>with</bold>
                  <bold>BESS</bold>
                  <bold>(FFR)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Disturbance magnitude</td>
                <td>10 MW PV trip</td>
                <td>35 kA</td>
                <td>10 MW PV trip</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fault location</td>
                <td>6.6 kV PCC (PV connection)</td>
                <td>PCC</td>
                <td>6.6 kV PCC</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Clearing time</td>
                <td>N/A</td>
                <td>200 ms</td>
                <td>N/A</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Frequency nadir (Hz)</td>
                <td>49.3</td>
                <td>49.3</td>
                <td>49.55</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Minimum voltage (p.u.)</td>
                <td>0.94</td>
                <td>0.25</td>
                <td>0.98</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Maximum rotor angle (˚)</td>
                <td>±4.8</td>
                <td>Stable (No loss of synchronism)</td>
                <td>±3.5</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Settling time (s)</td>
                <td>≈20</td>
                <td>≈1.5</td>
                <td>≈10</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>RoCoF</td>
                <td>See discussion below</td>
                <td>N/A</td>
                <td>Lower than PV-only case</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The quantitative results confirm that the hybrid diesel-PV microgrid remains transiently stable for all investigated disturbances. Following the sudden loss of 10 MW of photovoltaic generation, the system frequency decreases to a minimum value of approximately 49.3 Hz, while the PCC voltage reaches approximately 0.94 p.u. before recovering to its nominal value. The maximum rotor-angle deviation remains limited to approximately ±5˚, indicating that synchronism is preserved throughout the disturbance. During the simulated three-phase short circuit applied at the PCC, the fault current reaches approximately 35 kA, and the protection system successfully clears the fault within 200 ms, resulting in rapid voltage recovery without generator instability. When Fast Frequency Response (FFR) from the BESS is enabled, the frequency nadir improves to approximately 49.55 Hz, rotor-angle oscillations are more effectively damped, and the settling time is reduced from approximately 20 s to 10 s, demonstrating the beneficial contribution of synthetic inertia and rapid active-power support.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot4">
        <title>5.4. Hybrid Microgrid Transient Stability</title>
        <p>The transient stability simulations evaluate the dynamic performance of the proposed 15 MW PV-integrated hybrid diesel microgrid under representative operating disturbances. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1-6</xref> present the system response in terms of Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF), governor primary response, BESS state of charge, PV ramp-rate control, fault current characteristics, circuit breaker operation, PCC voltage recovery, and protection coordination. These results provide a comprehensive assessment of the hybrid microgrid’s ability to withstand disturbances, rapidly restore system stability, and maintain reliable and secure operation under high photovoltaic penetration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">32</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>].</p>
        <p>The above figures present the transient stability performance of the proposed hybrid diesel-PV microgrid under dynamic operating conditions. The simulations evaluate the system response to rapid PV generation loss, frequency disturbances, three-phase faults, and protection system operation. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(a)</xref> presents the Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF) following rapid PV loss, while <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(b)</xref> illustrates the corresponding primary frequency response provided by the diesel generator governor.</p>
        <fig id="fig5">
          <label>Figure 5</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7601522-rId20.jpeg?20260904020917" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 5</bold><bold>.</bold> Dynamic stability of the hybrid diesel-PV-BESS microgrid.</p>
        <p>The instantaneous RoCoF plot presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(a)</xref> corresponds to the numerical derivative calculated immediately after the imposed disturbance. This value represents the instantaneous simulation response rather than the filtered RoCoF evaluated by practical protection relays. Modern numerical relays estimate RoCoF using moving measurement windows and digital filtering, thereby significantly attenuating the initial spike. Consequently, the instantaneous excursion shown in the simulation should not be directly compared with the relay operating threshold of −0.5 Hz/s. The protection assessment presented in this study is therefore based on the filtered RoCoF response rather than on the instantaneous numerical derivative. The BESS supplies short-term dynamic support, maintaining an adequate state of charge and improving frequency stability during transient events, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(c)</xref>. The PV ramp-rate control effectively limits sudden power fluctuations, thereby reducing the impact on diesel generators and network frequency, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(d)</xref>.</p>
        <p>Short-circuit simulations demonstrate the three-phase fault-current response at the PCC, as presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(e)</xref>, and a rapid interruption of the fault following circuit breaker operation, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(f)</xref>. The PCC voltage subsequently recovers quickly after fault clearance, confirming satisfactory voltage stability, as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(g)</xref>. The time-current characteristic (TCC) in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(h)</xref> verifies proper coordination of the overcurrent protection system, ensuring selective and reliable fault isolation.</p>
        <p>Protection coordination simulations were carried out using the existing SMD overcurrent relay settings implemented in the ETAP model. The coordination assessment, represented by the fault-clearing sequence in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(f)</xref> and the TCC characteristic in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5(h)</xref>, verified relay selectivity, breaker operating sequence, and fault-clearing performance for the adopted fault scenarios, confirming correct discrimination between primary and backup protection devices.</p>
        <p>Overall, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5(a)-(h)</xref> demonstrate that the proposed 15 MW PV-integrated diesel microgrid exhibits satisfactory transient stability, effective protection coordination, rapid fault recovery, and robust dynamic performance, confirming its suitability for reliable operation in an isolated mining power system with high renewable energy penetration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot5">
        <title>5.5. Harmonic Analysis</title>
        <p>Harmonic simulations were conducted to evaluate the power quality performance of the proposed 15 MW PV-integrated hybrid microgrid under normal operating conditions. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figures 1-6</xref> present the results for current harmonic distortion (THDi), network resonance characteristics, voltage harmonic spectrum, filter effectiveness, and comparative total harmonic voltage distortion (THDv) before and after PV integration. The analysis provides a comprehensive assessment of the impact of photovoltaic generation on harmonic performance and verifies compliance with IEEE Std. 519 through the application of appropriate harmonic mitigation measures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>].</p>
        <fig id="fig6">
          <label>Figure 6</label>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/7601522-rId21.jpeg?20260904020918" />
        </fig>
        <p><bold>Figure 6.</bold> Harmonic performance of the hybrid diesel-PV microgrid.</p>
        <p>Harmonic analysis was conducted using ETAP to evaluate the impact of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant on power quality and compliance with IEEE 519 and IEC 61000 standards. The assessment included current harmonic distortion (THDi) of major nonlinear loads (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(a)</xref>), impedance scanning for resonance identification (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(b)</xref>), voltage harmonic spectrum analysis at the point of common coupling (PCC) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(c)</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(e)</xref>), and the effectiveness of harmonic mitigation techniques (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(d)</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(f)</xref>).</p>
        <p>The results indicate that variable speed drives (VSDs) are the dominant harmonic sources, exhibiting the highest current distortion, followed by UPS systems and rectifiers, whereas the PV inverter contributes comparatively lower harmonic distortion due to its advanced PWM control and integrated LCL filtering, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(a)</xref>. Impedance scan analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(b)</xref>) identified potential resonance frequencies around 500 - 600 Hz and at higher frequencies around 1000 Hz, highlighting the need to prevent harmonic amplification under certain network operating conditions.</p>
        <p>The voltage harmonic spectrum at the PCC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(c)</xref>) shows that the lower-order harmonic components are dominant, with their magnitude progressively decreasing at higher harmonic orders. The comparative harmonic spectrum (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(e)</xref>) further illustrates the effect of PV integration on individual voltage harmonic components and the subsequent reduction achieved through harmonic filtering. Nevertheless, the overall voltage distortion remains within acceptable limits, indicating that no significant resonance amplification occurs under normal operating conditions. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(d)</xref> demonstrates that passive and active harmonic filters substantially reduce the total harmonic voltage distortion (THDv), while <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6(f)</xref> compares THDv at the 6.6 kV PCC bus, 0.4 kV utilities, and 0.4 kV MCC before PV integration, after PV integration, and after the application of harmonic filters. These results demonstrate that appropriate filtering significantly improves power quality and supports compliance with international harmonic standards.</p>
        <p>Overall, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figures 6(a)-(f)</xref> demonstrate that the proposed diesel-PV hybrid microgrid maintains satisfactory harmonic performance when appropriate filtering and resonance-mitigation measures are implemented. The resulting harmonic distortion at the PCC remains within acceptable power-quality limits, supporting reliable system operation and compliance with the applicable requirements of IEEE Std 519 and IEC 61000 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">36</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">37</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec5dot6">
        <title>5.6. Performance Evaluation</title>
        <p>The technical performance of the proposed hybrid diesel-PV power system was evaluated using a comprehensive set of electrical performance indicators to quantify the impact of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic power plant into the isolated SMD mining microgrid. Comparative assessments were performed between the reference diesel-only configuration and the hybrid operating scenarios to evaluate both steady-state and dynamic system behavior. </p>
        <p>The principal evaluation criteria included bus voltage magnitude (p.u.), active and reactive power flow (MW/MVAr), generator loading (%), system frequency (Hz), Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF), rotor angle stability, short-circuit current (kA), relay operating time (ms), total harmonic voltage distortion (THDv), and total harmonic current distortion (THDi). Additional indicators, including network losses, power factor, diesel fuel displacement, and renewable energy penetration, were also considered to assess the overall operational efficiency and reliability of the hybrid microgrid. </p>
        <p>The simulation results were benchmarked against the relevant requirements of IEC 60909, IEEE 519, IEEE 1547, IEC 61000, and IEC 60255 to verify compliance with internationally accepted limits for system stability, protection coordination, and power quality. The comparative analysis enabled a comprehensive assessment of the technical feasibility, operational reliability, and resilience of the proposed diesel-PV hybrid system under both normal operating conditions and severe network disturbances, providing quantitative engineering evidence to support the large-scale integration of photovoltaic generation into isolated mining microgrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">38</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>].</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec6">
      <title>6. Results and Discussion</title>
      <p>The comprehensive ETAP simulations demonstrate that integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant into the isolated SMD/Nordgold mining microgrid is technically feasible and substantially enhances the electrical performance, operational efficiency, and sustainability of the existing diesel-based power system. Comparative analyses between the reference diesel-only configuration and the proposed hybrid diesel-PV microgrid consistently indicate that high renewable energy penetration can be achieved without compromising electrical stability, protection performance, or power quality when appropriate inverter control strategies and energy storage support are implemented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">39</xref>].</p>
      <p>Under steady-state operating conditions, PV integration improved voltage regulation throughout the medium- and low-voltage network by providing local active power generation and reactive power support through Volt/VAR control. The resulting reduction in active and reactive power transfer through upstream transformers and distribution feeders decreased network losses, improved the overall power factor, and significantly reduced diesel generator loading. These improvements demonstrate the ability of distributed photovoltaic generation to increase system efficiency while reducing fuel consumption, operating costs, and greenhouse gas emissions, thereby supporting the decarbonization objectives of isolated mining operations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">40</xref>].</p>
      <p>Dynamic simulations confirmed that the proposed hybrid diesel-PV microgrid maintains satisfactory transient stability under severe operating disturbances. Following generation-load imbalances and sudden reductions in photovoltaic output, the synchronous diesel generators remained synchronized and exhibited well-damped rotor-angle oscillations, while the automatic voltage regulators and governor control systems restored voltage and frequency to acceptable operating limits. Although increased photovoltaic penetration reduced the effective rotational inertia of the system, the implementation of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) providing Fast Frequency Response (FFR) significantly enhanced dynamic performance by reducing the Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF), improving the frequency nadir, shortening recovery time, and mitigating the impact of renewable intermittency. The transient-performance indices summarized in <bold>Table 6</bold> further demonstrate that the proposed hybrid system maintained a minimum frequency of approximately 49.3 Hz, a minimum PCC voltage of 0.94 p.u., rotor-angle deviations below ±5˚, and successful fault clearance within 200 ms under the investigated disturbances, confirming compliance with the transient stability objectives established for the study.</p>
      <p>These results confirm that coordinated inverter controls and fast-acting energy storage are essential for maintaining frequency resilience in isolated mining microgrids with high renewable penetration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>].</p>
      <p>Short-circuit and protection studies demonstrated that inverter-based photovoltaic generation moderately reduced fault-current levels compared with the diesel-only configuration. Nevertheless, the reduction was not sufficient to compromise protection system performance. Minor adjustments to relay pickup settings and coordination margins were adequate to preserve selective fault isolation and reliable circuit-breaker operation. These findings indicate that existing protection schemes can generally accommodate large-scale photovoltaic integration with limited modifications, provided that detailed protection coordination studies are performed during the design stage. </p>
      <p>Power quality assessments further showed that the dominant harmonic distortion originated from existing nonlinear industrial loads, particularly variable-speed drives, rather than from the photovoltaic inverter itself. With appropriate passive and active harmonic filtering, both voltage and current harmonic distortion remained within the limits prescribed by IEEE 519, confirming that large-scale photovoltaic integration can be achieved without adversely affecting power quality. This result highlights the importance of harmonic mitigation measures in industrial microgrids containing extensive power electronic equipment. </p>
      <p>Overall, the simulation results provide strong engineering evidence that the proposed hybrid diesel-PV architecture represents a technically robust and operationally reliable solution for isolated mining power systems. Beyond reducing diesel fuel consumption and carbon emissions, the integration of advanced inverter controls, coordinated protection, and BESS support enables high renewable energy penetration while maintaining electrical stability, operational security, and compliance with internationally recognised power system standards. These findings demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed ETAP-based methodology and provide valuable guidance for the planning, design, and implementation of renewable-powered mining microgrids in Africa and other remote industrial regions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec7">
      <title>7. Engineering Implications</title>
      <p>This study provides a practical engineering framework for integrating large-scale photovoltaic (PV) generation into isolated diesel-powered mining microgrids. The ETAP simulation results demonstrate that high PV penetration can be successfully achieved without compromising system reliability when supported by comprehensive load-flow, transient stability, short-circuit, protection coordination, and harmonic analyses during the design stage. Advanced inverter functions including Volt/VAR control, LVRT/HVRT, frequency droop, and ramp-rate control together with a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) providing Fast Frequency Response (FFR), significantly enhance voltage regulation, frequency stability, and overall system resilience. </p>
      <p>The study also demonstrates that the reduced fault-current contribution of inverter-based generation can be effectively managed through appropriate relay setting adjustments and protection coordination, ensuring secure operation under bidirectional power-flow conditions. Furthermore, the proposed hybrid diesel-PV architecture reduces diesel consumption, network losses, operating costs, and greenhouse gas emissions while maintaining compliance with IEC 60909, IEC 61000, IEEE 519, and IEEE 1547. </p>
      <p>The proposed ETAP-based assessment methodology provides a practical reference for mining companies, utilities, consultants, and power system engineers involved in the planning, design, and implementation of reliable, resilient, and sustainable renewable-powered mining microgrids. It also offers valuable engineering guidance for future mining electrification and decarbonization projects in remote regions with high renewable energy penetration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">41</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">42</xref>].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec8">
      <title>8. Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study presented a comprehensive technical assessment of integrating a 15 MW photovoltaic (PV) power plant into the isolated electrical network of the Société Minière de Dinguiraye (SMD) gold mine in Guinea using a high-fidelity ETAP Version 22.5 simulation model. By combining steady-state and dynamic analyses including load-flow, transient stability, photovoltaic dynamic behavior, short-circuit analysis, protection coordination, harmonic assessment, and renewable intermittency studies the research demonstrated the technical feasibility of large-scale photovoltaic integration into an isolated mining microgrid without compromising system security, operational reliability, or power quality. </p>
      <p>The simulation results showed that the proposed hybrid diesel-PV configuration significantly improves voltage regulation, power factor, and overall network efficiency while reducing diesel generator loading, active and reactive power transfer, transmission losses, fuel consumption, and associated greenhouse gas emissions. Dynamic analyses confirmed satisfactory rotor-angle stability, effective voltage recovery, and acceptable frequency deviations following severe network disturbances. Furthermore, the integration of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) providing Fast Frequency Response (FFR) substantially enhanced system resilience by reducing the Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF), improving the frequency nadir, mitigating renewable intermittency, and accelerating post-disturbance frequency recovery. Protection studies demonstrated that only limited relay setting adjustments were required to accommodate the reduced fault-current contribution of inverter-based resources while maintaining adequate protection selectivity and fault-clearing performance. Harmonic analyses further confirmed compliance with IEEE 519 following the application of appropriate harmonic mitigation measures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">43</xref>][<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">44</xref>].</p>
      <p>A major contribution of this research is the development of an integrated ETAP-based engineering framework capable of simultaneously evaluating power-flow performance, transient stability, protection coordination, fault behavior, and power quality within a single validated industrial model. Unlike many previous investigations that consider these aspects independently, the proposed methodology provides a holistic and reproducible approach for assessing renewable energy integration in isolated mining power systems, thereby bridging the gap between academic research and industrial engineering practice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">45</xref>]. The validated ETAP model satisfied the adopted engineering acceptance criteria for voltage profile, equipment loading, power flow, and protection performance, providing confidence in the reproducibility and applicability of the reported simulation results for future hybrid diesel-PV microgrid studies.</p>
      <p>The findings demonstrate that, when supported by advanced inverter control strategies, coordinated protection schemes, and appropriately sized energy storage, large-scale photovoltaic generation can substantially decarbonize isolated mining operations while maintaining compliance with internationally recognized engineering standards. Consequently, the proposed hybrid diesel-PV architecture represents a technically robust, economically attractive, and environmentally sustainable solution for future mining electrification projects. </p>
      <p>Future research should extend the present work by incorporating techno-economic optimization, long-term operational scheduling, stochastic solar irradiance modelling, battery degradation analysis, real-time Energy Management Systems (EMS), and Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) or field validation to further strengthen the applicability of the proposed methodology for next-generation renewable-powered mining microgrids.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Energy Agency (IEA) (2024) Renewables 2024: Analysis and Forecast to 2030. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Renewables 2024: Analysis and Forecast to 2030</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) (2024) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023. IRENA. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2024/Sep/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2023</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2024</year>
            <article-title>Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) (2021) Climate Change Position Statement. ICMM. https://www.icmm.com/en-gb/our-principles/position-statements/climate-change</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Climate Change Position Statement</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">World Bank (2017) The Growing Role of Minerals and Metals for a Low-Carbon Future. World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/207371500386458722</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2017</year>
            <article-title>The Growing Role of Minerals and Metals for a Low-Carbon Future</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ocon, J.D. and Bertheau, P. (2019) Energy Transition from Diesel-Based to Solar Photovoltaics-Battery-Diesel Hybrid System-Based Island Grids in the Philippines—Techno-Economic Potential and Policy Implication on Missionary Electrification. <italic>Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy</italic>, <italic>Water and Environment Systems</italic>, 7, 139-154. https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0230 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0230</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0230">https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0230</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Ocon, J.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bertheau, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Energy, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Energy Transition from Diesel-Based to Solar Photovoltaics-Battery-Diesel Hybrid System-Based Island Grids in the Philippines—Techno-Economic Potential and Policy Implication on Missionary Electrification</article-title>
            <source>Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy</source>
            <volume>7</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13044/j.sdewes.d6.0230</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">Lasseter, R.H. (2002) MicroGrids. 2002 <italic>IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting</italic>. <italic>Conference Proceedings</italic> ( <italic>Cat</italic>. <italic>No</italic>.02 <italic>CH</italic>37309), New York, 27-31 January 2002, 305-308. https://doi.org/10.1109/pesw.2002.985003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/pesw.2002.985003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/pesw.2002.985003">https://doi.org/10.1109/pesw.2002.985003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="confproc">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lasseter, R.H.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2002</year>
            <article-title>MicroGrids</article-title>
            <source>2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309)</source>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/pesw.2002.985003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Hatziargyriou, N. (ed.) (2014) Microgrids: Architectures and Control. Wiley-IEEE Press.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hatziargyriou, N.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Microgrids: Architectures and Control</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kundur, P., Paserba, J., Ajjarapu, V., Andersson, G., Bose, A., Canizares, C., <italic>et al</italic>. (2004) Definition and Classification of Power System Stability. <italic>IEEE Transactions on Power Systems</italic>, 19, 1387-1401.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kundur, P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Paserba, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ajjarapu, V.</string-name>
              <string-name>Andersson, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bose, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Canizares, C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>Definition and Classification of Power System Stability</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Power Systems</source>
            <volume>19</volume>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Lopes, J.A.P., Moreira, C.L. and Madureira, A.G. (2006) Defining Control Strategies for Microgrids Islanded Operation. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Power</italic><italic>Systems</italic>, 21, 916-924. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873018 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873018</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873018">https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873018</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lopes, J.A.P.</string-name>
              <string-name>Moreira, C.L.</string-name>
              <string-name>Madureira, A.G.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2006</year>
            <article-title>Defining Control Strategies for Microgrids Islanded Operation</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Power Systems</source>
            <volume>21</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873018</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Pogaku, N., Prodanovic, M. and Green, T.C. (2007) Modeling, Analysis and Testing of Autonomous Operation of an Inverter-Based Microgrid. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Power</italic><italic>Electronics</italic>, 22, 613-625. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2006.890003 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2006.890003</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2006.890003">https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2006.890003</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Pogaku, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Prodanovic, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Green, T.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Modeling, A</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2007</year>
            <article-title>Modeling, Analysis and Testing of Autonomous Operation of an Inverter-Based Microgrid</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics</source>
            <volume>22</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2006.890003</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Rocabert, J., Luna, A., Blaabjerg, F. and Rodríguez, P. (2012) Control of Power Converters in AC Microgrids. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Power</italic><italic>Electronics</italic>, 27, 4734-4749. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2012.2199334 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2012.2199334</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2012.2199334">https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2012.2199334</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Rocabert, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Luna, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Blaabjerg, F.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Control of Power Converters in AC Microgrids</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics</source>
            <volume>27</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2012.2199334</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Bidram, A. and Davoudi, A. (2012) Hierarchical Structure of Microgrids Control System. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Smart</italic><italic>Grid</italic>, 3, 1963-1976. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2197425 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tsg.2012.2197425</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2197425">https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2197425</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bidram, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Davoudi, A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Hierarchical Structure of Microgrids Control System</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tsg.2012.2197425</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Olivares, D.E., Mehrizi-Sani, A., Etemadi, A.H., Canizares, C.A., Iravani, R., Kazerani, M., <italic>et al</italic>. (2014) Trends in Microgrid Control. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Smart</italic><italic>Grid</italic>, 5, 1905-1919. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514">https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Olivares, D.E.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mehrizi-Sani, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Etemadi, A.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Canizares, C.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Iravani, R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Kazerani, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Trends in Microgrid Control</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid</source>
            <volume>5</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bevrani, H., Ise, T. and Miura, Y. (2014) Virtual Synchronous Generators: A Survey and New Perspectives. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Electrical</italic><italic>Power</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Energy</italic><italic>Systems</italic>, 54, 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bevrani, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ise, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Miura, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Virtual Synchronous Generators: A Survey and New Perspectives</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Electrical Power &amp; Energy Systems</source>
            <volume>54</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.07.009</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kerdphol, T., Fuji, K., Mitani, Y., Watanabe, M. and Qudaih, Y. (2016) Optimization of a Battery Energy Storage System Using Particle Swarm Optimization for Stand-Alone Microgrids. <italic>International</italic><italic>Journal</italic><italic>of</italic><italic>Electrical</italic><italic>Power</italic><italic>&amp;</italic><italic>Energy</italic><italic>Systems</italic>, 81, 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.006 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.006</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.006</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kerdphol, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fuji, K.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mitani, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Watanabe, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Qudaih, Y.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>Optimization of a Battery Energy Storage System Using Particle Swarm Optimization for Stand-Alone Microgrids</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Electrical Power &amp; Energy Systems</source>
            <volume>81</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.02.006</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Kerdphol, T., Rahman, F.S., Mitani, Y., Watanabe, M. and Küfeoğlu, S. (2018) Robust Virtual Inertia Control of an Islanded Microgrid Considering High Penetration of Renewable Energy. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Access</italic>, 6, 625-636. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2773486 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2017.2773486</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2773486">https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2773486</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Kerdphol, T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rahman, F.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mitani, Y.</string-name>
              <string-name>Watanabe, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>Robust Virtual Inertia Control of an Islanded Microgrid Considering High Penetration of Renewable Energy</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Access</source>
            <volume>6</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2017.2773486</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Joung, K.W., Lee, H. and Park, J. (2019) Assessment of Maximum Penetration Capacity of Photovoltaic Generator Considering Frequency Stability in Practical Stand-Alone Microgrid. <italic>Energies</italic>, 12, Article No. 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081445 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/en12081445</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081445">https://doi.org/10.3390/en12081445</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Joung, K.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Lee, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Park, J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2019</year>
            <article-title>Assessment of Maximum Penetration Capacity of Photovoltaic Generator Considering Frequency Stability in Practical Stand-Alone Microgrid</article-title>
            <source>Energies</source>
            <volume>12</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/en12081445</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Grover, H., Verma, A. and Bhatti, T.S. (2022) DOBC-Based Frequency &amp; Voltage Regulation Strategy for PV-Diesel Hybrid Microgrid during Islanding Conditions. <italic>Ren</italic><italic>ewable Energy</italic>, 196, 883-900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.140 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.140</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.140">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.140</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Grover, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Verma, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bhatti, T.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>DOBC-Based Frequency &amp; Voltage Regulation Strategy for PV-Diesel Hybrid Microgrid during Islanding Conditions</article-title>
            <source>Renewable Energy</source>
            <volume>196</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.140</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Youssef, A., Mallah, M., Ali, A., Shaaban, M.F. and Mohamed, E.E.M. (2023) Enhancement of Microgrid Frequency Stability Based on the Combined Power-to-Hydrogen-to-Power Technology under High Penetration Renewable Units. <italic>Energies</italic>, 16, Article No. 3377. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083377 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/en16083377</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083377">https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083377</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Youssef, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mallah, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ali, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shaaban, M.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mohamed, E.E.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Enhancement of Microgrid Frequency Stability Based on the Combined Power-to-Hydrogen-to-Power Technology under High Penetration Renewable Units</article-title>
            <source>Energies</source>
            <volume>16</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/en16083377</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Sepasi, S., Talichet, C. and Pramanik, A.S. (2023) Power Quality in Microgrids: A Critical Review of Fundamentals, Standards, and Case Studies. <italic>IEEE Access</italic>, 11, 108493-108531. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3321301 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2023.3321301</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3321301">https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3321301</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Sepasi, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Talichet, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Pramanik, A.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Fundamentals, S</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>Power Quality in Microgrids: A Critical Review of Fundamentals, Standards, and Case Studies</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Access</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2023.3321301</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <label>21.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hamanah, W.M., Hossain, M.I., Shafiullah, M. and Abido, M.A. (2023) AC Microgrid Protection Schemes: A Comprehensive Review. <italic>IEEE Access</italic>, 11, 76842-76868. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3298306 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2023.3298306</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3298306">https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3298306</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hamanah, W.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hossain, M.I.</string-name>
              <string-name>Shafiullah, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Abido, M.A.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2023</year>
            <article-title>AC Microgrid Protection Schemes: A Comprehensive Review</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Access</source>
            <volume>11</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/access.2023.3298306</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <label>22.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Oureilidis, K.O. and Demoulias, C.S. (2016) A Fault Clearing Method in Converter-Dominated Microgrids with Conventional Protection Means. <italic>IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics</italic>, 31, 4628-4640. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2015.2476702 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2015.2476702</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2015.2476702">https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2015.2476702</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Oureilidis, K.O.</string-name>
              <string-name>Demoulias, C.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>A Fault Clearing Method in Converter-Dominated Microgrids with Conventional Protection Means</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics</source>
            <volume>31</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2015.2476702</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <label>23.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Paquette, A.D. and Divan, D.M. (2015) Virtual Impedance Current Limiting for Inverters in Microgrids with Synchronous Generators. <italic>IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications</italic>, 51, 1630-1638. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2014.2345877 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tia.2014.2345877</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2014.2345877">https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2014.2345877</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Paquette, A.D.</string-name>
              <string-name>Divan, D.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>Virtual Impedance Current Limiting for Inverters in Microgrids with Synchronous Generators</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications</source>
            <volume>51</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tia.2014.2345877</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <label>24.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hussain, M.H., Rahim, S.R.A. and Musirin, I. (2013) Optimal Overcurrent Relay Coordination: A Review. <italic>Procedia Engineering</italic>, 53, 332-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.043 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.043</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.043">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.043</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Hussain, M.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rahim, S.R.A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Musirin, I.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>Optimal Overcurrent Relay Coordination: A Review</article-title>
            <source>Procedia Engineering</source>
            <volume>53</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.proeng.2013.02.043</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <label>25.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lyu, M., Wu, G., Rao, Z., Zheng, J., Zhang, C., Huang, S., <italic>et al</italic>. (2021) Predictive Cascaded Speed and Torque Control for a Novel Three-Modular Three-Phase PMSM. <italic>International Journal of Electrical Power &amp; Energy Systems</italic>, 129, Article ID: 106798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106798 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106798</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106798">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106798</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Lyu, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Wu, G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rao, Z.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zheng, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Zhang, C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Huang, S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Predictive Cascaded Speed and Torque Control for a Novel Three-Modular Three-Phase PMSM</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Electrical Power &amp; Energy Systems</source>
            <volume>129</volume>
            <fpage>106798</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.106798</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <label>26.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">ETAP (2026) ETAP Electrical Power System Analysis Software: Product Documentation. Operation Technology, Inc. https://etap.com</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Technology, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2026</year>
            <article-title>ETAP Electrical Power System Analysis Software: Product Documentation</article-title>
            <source>Operation Technology</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <label>27.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">IEEE (2018) IEEE Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources with Associated Electric Power Systems Interfaces, IEEE Std 1547-2018. IEEE.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Interfaces, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2018</year>
            <article-title>IEEE Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources with Associated Electric Power Systems Interfaces, IEEE Std 1547-2018</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <label>28.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2004) IEC 61727: Photovoltaic Systems-Characteristics of the Utility Interface. IEC. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/5736</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2004</year>
            <article-title>IEC 61727: Photovoltaic Systems-Characteristics of the Utility Interface</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <label>29.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">IEEE (2022) IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems, IEEE Std 519-2022. IEEE.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Systems, I</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>IEEE Recommended Practice and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electric Power Systems, IEEE Std 519-2022</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <label>30.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2016) IEC 60909-0: Short-Circuit Currents in Three-Phase AC Systems—Part 0: Calculation of Currents. IEC. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/24100</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2016</year>
            <article-title>IEC 60909-0: Short-Circuit Currents in Three-Phase AC Systems—Part 0: Calculation of Currents</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <label>31.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2015) IEC 61000-4-30: Electro-magnetic Compatibility-Part 4-30: Testing and Measurement Techniques-Power Quality Measurement Methods. IEC. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/21844</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2015</year>
            <article-title>IEC 61000-4-30: Electro-magnetic Compatibility-Part 4-30: Testing and Measurement Techniques-Power Quality Measurement Methods</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <label>32.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2022) IEC 60255-1: Measuring Relays and Protection Equipment-Part 1: Common Requirements. IEC. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/59762?utm_source=chatgpt.com</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>IEC 60255-1: Measuring Relays and Protection Equipment-Part 1: Common Requirements</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <label>33.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2013) IEC 61850-1: Communication Networks and Systems for Power Utility Automation-Part 1: Introduction and Overview. IEC. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/6007</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2013</year>
            <article-title>IEC 61850-1: Communication Networks and Systems for Power Utility Automation-Part 1: Introduction and Overview</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <label>34.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="web">International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) (2022) IEC 60034-1: Rotating Electrical Machines-Part 1: Rating and Performance. IEC. https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/65446</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="web">
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>IEC 60034-1: Rotating Electrical Machines-Part 1: Rating and Performance</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <label>35.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Arrillaga, J. and Watson, N.R. (2003) Power System Harmonics. 2nd Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470871229 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/0470871229</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/0470871229">https://doi.org/10.1002/0470871229</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Arrillaga, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Watson, N.R.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, J</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2003</year>
            <article-title>Power System Harmonics</article-title>
            <source>2nd Edition</source>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/0470871229</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <label>36.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Bollen, M.H.J. (2000) Understanding Power Quality Problems: Voltage Sags and Interruptions. IEEE Press.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Bollen, M.H.J.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2000</year>
            <article-title>Understanding Power Quality Problems: Voltage Sags and Interruptions</article-title>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <label>37.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Dugan, R.C., McGranaghan, M.F., Santoso, S. and Beaty, H.W. (2012) Electrical Power Systems Quality. 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9780071761550</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Dugan, R.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>McGranaghan, M.F.</string-name>
              <string-name>Santoso, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Beaty, H.W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, M</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Electrical Power Systems Quality</article-title>
            <source>3rd Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <label>38.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="book">Horowitz, S.H. and Phadke, A.G. (2014) Power System Relaying. 4th Edition, Wiley.</mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="book">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Horowitz, S.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Phadke, A.G.</string-name>
              <string-name>Edition, W</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Power System Relaying</article-title>
            <source>4th Edition</source>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <label>39.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Guerrero, J.M., Vasquez, J.C., Matas, J., de Vicuña, L.G. and Castilla, M. (2011) Hierarchical Control of Droop-Controlled AC and DC Microgrids—A General Approach toward Standardization. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Industrial</italic><italic>Electronics</italic>, 58, 158-172. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2010.2066534 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tie.2010.2066534</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2010.2066534">https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2010.2066534</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Guerrero, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vasquez, J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Matas, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Castilla, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2011</year>
            <article-title>Hierarchical Control of Droop-Controlled AC and DC Microgrids—A General Approach toward Standardization</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics</source>
            <volume>58</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tie.2010.2066534</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <label>40.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Savaghebi, M., Jalilian, A., Vasquez, J.C. and Guerrero, J.M. (2012) Secondary Control for Voltage Quality Enhancement in Microgrids. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Smart</italic><italic>Grid</italic>, 3, 1893-1902. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2205281 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tsg.2012.2205281</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2205281">https://doi.org/10.1109/tsg.2012.2205281</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Savaghebi, M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Jalilian, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vasquez, J.C.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guerrero, J.M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2012</year>
            <article-title>Secondary Control for Voltage Quality Enhancement in Microgrids</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tsg.2012.2205281</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <label>41.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Shafiee, Q., Guerrero, J.M. and Vasquez, J.C. (2014) Distributed Secondary Control for Islanded Microgrids—A Novel Approach. <italic>IEEE</italic><italic>Transactions</italic><italic>on</italic><italic>Power</italic><italic>Electronics</italic>, 29, 1018-1031. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2013.2259506 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2013.2259506</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2013.2259506">https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2013.2259506</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Shafiee, Q.</string-name>
              <string-name>Guerrero, J.M.</string-name>
              <string-name>Vasquez, J.C.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2014</year>
            <article-title>Distributed Secondary Control for Islanded Microgrids—A Novel Approach</article-title>
            <source>IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics</source>
            <volume>29</volume>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/tpel.2013.2259506</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <label>42.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Coban, H.H., Rehman, A. and Mousa, M. (2022) Load Frequency Control of Microgrid System by Battery and Pumped-Hydro Energy Storage. <italic>Water</italic>, 14, Article No. 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111818 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w14111818</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111818">https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111818</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Coban, H.H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Rehman, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Mousa, M.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2022</year>
            <article-title>Load Frequency Control of Microgrid System by Battery and Pumped-Hydro Energy Storage</article-title>
            <source>Water</source>
            <volume>14</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w14111818</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <label>43.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="other">Chauhan, A., Upadhyay, S., Khan, M.T., Hussain, S.M.S. and Ustun, T.S. (2021) Performance Investigation of a Solar Photovoltaic/Diesel Generator Based Hybrid System with Cycle Charging Strategy Using BBO Algorithm. <italic>Sustainability</italic>, 13, Article No. 8048. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148048 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13148048</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148048">https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148048</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="other">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Chauhan, A.</string-name>
              <string-name>Upadhyay, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Khan, M.T.</string-name>
              <string-name>Hussain, S.M.S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ustun, T.S.</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Performance Investigation of a Solar Photovoltaic/Diesel Generator Based Hybrid System with Cycle Charging Strategy Using BBO Algorithm</article-title>
            <source>Sustainability</source>
            <volume>13</volume>
            <elocation-id>No</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13148048</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <label>44.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Marqusee, J., Becker, W. and Ericson, S. (2021) Resilience and Economics of Microgrids with PV, Battery Storage, and Networked Diesel Generators. <italic>Advances</italic><italic>in</italic><italic>Applied</italic><italic>E</italic><italic>nergy</italic>, 3, Article ID: 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100049 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100049</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100049">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100049</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Marqusee, J.</string-name>
              <string-name>Becker, W.</string-name>
              <string-name>Ericson, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>PV, B</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2021</year>
            <article-title>Resilience and Economics of Microgrids with PV, Battery Storage, and Networked Diesel Generators</article-title>
            <source>Advances in Applied Energy</source>
            <volume>3</volume>
            <fpage>100049</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100049</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <label>45.</label>
        <citation-alternatives>
          <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khosravi, N., Çelik, D., Bevrani, H. and Echalih, S. (2025) Microgrid Stability: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges, Trends, and Emerging Solutions. <italic>International Journal of Electrical Power &amp; Energy Systems</italic>, 170, Article ID: 110829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110829 <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110829</pub-id><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110829">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110829</ext-link></mixed-citation>
          <element-citation publication-type="journal">
            <person-group person-group-type="author">
              <string-name>Khosravi, N.</string-name>
              <string-name>Bevrani, H.</string-name>
              <string-name>Echalih, S.</string-name>
              <string-name>Challenges, T</string-name>
            </person-group>
            <year>2025</year>
            <article-title>Microgrid Stability: A Comprehensive Review of Challenges, Trends, and Emerging Solutions</article-title>
            <source>International Journal of Electrical Power &amp; Energy Systems</source>
            <volume>170</volume>
            <fpage>110829</fpage>
            <elocation-id>ID</elocation-id>
            <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijepes.2025.110829</pub-id>
          </element-citation>
        </citation-alternatives>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>