The Structural Constant s0 of All Atoms as a Universal Physical Constant

A universal physical constant (or fundamental constant) is an empirical physical quantity that remains unchanged throughout the universe and across time. All of these properties are satisfied by the structural constant of all atoms s₀, shown in the article [1], and fine-structure constant

α=

e

2

/

(

2

ε

0

hc

)

, which was introduced into physics by Arnold Sommerfeld in 1915, and therefore we can claim that that constants are universal physical constants which is also called a natural constants like the speed of light c, Newton constant of gravitation G, vacuum magnetic permeability µ₀, vacuum electric permittivity ε₀ or others, like cosmological constant Λ, elementary charge e, electron mass m_e, proton mass m_p, neutron mass m_n or Avogadro constant N_A and so on. I note that Planck’s h is not among the above-mentioned universal constants. The reason for this is that according to my earlier research Planck’s h is a complex physical quantity consisting of the aforementioned universal constants and structural constant s₀:

h=

μ

0

c

e

2

s

0

2

, [2]. If the fine-structure constant α is determined precisely in a different way, as done in the article [3], then expression α is used to determine Planck’s h and finally to calculate the structural constant s₀. We will use this fact to write this article. With very precise data for the fine-structure constant α, this is the most accurate calculation for s₀.

• Fine-Structure Constant
• Structural Constant of All Atoms
• Mendeleev’s Periodic Table
• Unit of Substance Type “Boscovich”
• Universal Physical Constant

1. Introduction

The structure constant s₀ of all atoms refers to the quantity obtained when all atoms in the Mendeleev’s periodic table are ionized, when electrons are ejected from each atom, down to the last electron, until the atom is ionized to the very nucleus of each atom.

I note that the structure constant s₀ was independently measured when measuring the ionization energy of all atoms [1]:

s 0 = z Z 2 n ± 1 1 − [ 1 − e V em ( n ) m c 2 ] 2

Let us now recall the meaning of quantities in this equation. Z is the atomic number in Mendeleev’s periodic table, z is the number of electrons in one orbital of the atom, n^±1, is the ordinal number of an orbital (shall) in an atom. This expression, in addition to the usual paths n = n + 1 = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , ⋯ , also predicts paths n = n − 1 = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , ⋯ , which opens up the possibility of electron paths in the atom below the first orbit, so for ex ample a neutron can be considered a hydrogen atom with path n= n⁻¹ = 126, whereby the mass of the electron in neutron due its speed and relativistic effects increases so much that the neutron become 0.14% heavier than the proton [2], m is the rest mass of one electron, c is the speed of light in vacuum, e is the charge of one electron and V_em(n) is the ionization potential of a single atom.

From the previous equation for s₀, two equations for V_em are obtained:

V em ( 1 ) = m c 2 z e [ 1 − 1 − ( 1 n ± 1 z Z 2 s 0 2 ) 2 ] V em ( 2 ) = m c 2 z e [ 1 + 1 − ( 1 n ± 1 z Z 2 s 0 2 ) 2 ] .

The solution V_em(1) is for the lower (ionization) voltages (namely, we will see later after we determinate s₀, for q = −e, z = 1, n^±1 = 1) when Z is going from 0 to 137.035999166(15), than ionization voltage V_em(1) is going from 0 V to 510 999 V, and the solution V_em(2) (q = −e, z = 1, Z = 1/n^±1) when Z is going from 0 to 137.035999166(15) (ionization) voltage V_em(2) goes in opposite direction from 1 020 130 V to 510 999 V.

The value of structural constant s₀ is the same for all atoms (see Table 1).

Table 1. Structural constant of atoms s₀ calculated on the basis of ionization voltage according NIST’s data*.

Table 1

Chemical symbol	Atom number Z	Ionization voltage [V]	Structural constant s 0	Remark
n 0 , H	1	712207.805, 13.59843449*	8.278691910036	In V em(2) n − 1 = 126
He	2	54.4177650*	8.277860595602
Li	3	122.4543581*	8.277755226469
Be	4	217.7185843*	8.277739553105
B	5	340.226020*	8.277739896484
C	6	489.993194*	8.277757231963
N	7	667.046116*	8.277771755296
O	8	871.409880*	8.277791688375
F	9	1103.11747*	8.277812276144
Ne	10	1362.19915*	8.277842618038
Ca	20	5469.8615*	8.278203152589
Zn	30	12388.929*	8.278637976575
Zr	40	22236.677*	8.279106265650
Sn	50	35192.39*	8.279610860584
Nd	60	51515.58*	8.280166600276
Yb	70	71574.80*	8.280846679237
Hg	80	95897.70*	8.281775555833
Th	90	125253.40*	8.283267729872
Fm	100	160804.00*	8.286011987216
Ds	110	204394.00*	8.291558770012	Latest data at NIST

NIST: National Institute of Standard and Technology. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_of_Standards_and_Technology*https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/ASD/ionEnergy.html

As we can see, all s₀ values for all atoms are concentrated around the value 8.278 - 8.291. For precise determination, more accurate measurement is required. For this purpose, we will use another most accurate measurement.

The most accurate value of the inverse fine-structure constant, more accurate than previous results obtained based on the ionization energies of atoms, [1], is given in the article [3] and it is by Arnold Sommerfeld:

(1) α − 1 = 2 ε 0 h c / e 2 = 137.035999166 ( 15 )   [ 0.11   ppb ]

This was obtained by measuring the magnetic moment of the electron, which is the most accurate way to determine the fine-structure constant α. Therefore, this can be a guide for determining the structure constant s₀, and we will use it in the following.

We assume that Planck’s h in Equation (1) is not predefined. Therefore, Planck’s h from Equation (1) can be expressed as:

(2) h = α − 1 e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 c ) = α − 1 e 2 μ 0 c / 2

taking into account that it is worth:

(3) μ 0 ε 0 c 2 = 1

Planck’s h is, according to article [2], based on the Lecher line model of the atom [2], equal to:

(4) h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2

Here is the explanation! The characteristics of an oscillatory circuit obtained from a Lecher line depend only on the parameters of inductance L and capacitance C of that circuit, and not on variables in that circuit, such as charges, currents, or voltages. Thus, it was shown that the electromagnetic energy E_em of this oscillator is proportional to its own frequency f = 1 / ( 2 π L C ) , and a constant h, E_em = hf, and this constant h itself is h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 . This represents the well-known Planck’s law for the energy of an electromagnetic wave, and here it is the energy of an electromagnetic oscillator created from a Lecher line.

Using Equation (1), and equating Equations (2) and (4), the structural constant s₀ is obtained:

(5) s 0 = 1 2 = 8.27756

Using Equation (5), and according to article [2], the maximum number of different type of atoms in Mendeleev’s table, not counting isotopes, is:

(6) 1 / B = 2 s 0 2 = 137.035999166

The explanation for the stated amount comes from determining the speed that an electron can reach in the first shell of an atom ( n ± 1 = 1 ) in relation to the speed of light:

β max = v max c = 1 n ± 1 z Z max 2 s 0 2 = 1

From here for z = 1, n ± 1 = 1 it follows that Z max = 2 s 0 2 , that is Equation (6).

From Equation (6) it follows that the distance between two adjacent types of atoms, and I suggest that this measure be called a unit of measurement for a type of substance “boscovich”, B, [4] is equal to:

(7) B = 1 / ( 2 s 0 2 ) = 7.297352568 × 10 − 3

Equation (7) simultaneously represents the fine-structure constant α according to NIST in 2022 CODATA.

From Equations (4) and (5) comes Planck’s h:

(8) h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 = 6.626070159 × 10 − 34   J ⋅ Hz − 1

This value in Equation (8) exactly matches the value of Planck’s h obtained by NIST in 2022, CODATA. In the same time, it can be seen from Table 2 that all other results are precisely aligned with NIST in 2022 CODATA, i.e., without difference, using the results from article [3] and the results from the two remaining articles [1] and [2].

Such good agreement of the results with CODATA values using the new constant s₀ would not be possible without a new fundamental constant s₀, which is independent and precisely measurable. Namely if s₀ were not a universal physical constant, at least one of the 9 physical quantities in Table 2 would not match the values in CODATA 2022.

Table 2. Eight (8) initial constants (s₀, B, 1/B, c, μ₀, e, m, m_p) convert (9) nine constants in interchangeable.

Table 2

Quantity	Symbol	Formula	Value	Unit	Difference a
Structural constant of all atoms	s 0	s 0 Equation (5)	8.27756 b	1	unknown
Unit of substance type = boscovichMax. number of diff. type of atomsSpeed of light in vacuum	B 1/ B c	1 / ( 2 s 0 2 ) Equation (7) 2 s 0 2 Equation (6) ε 0 μ 0 c 2 = 1	7.297352568 × 10 − 3 137.035999166299792458	11m·s − 1	0.00000.00000.0000
Vacuum magnetic permeability	μ 0	μ 0	1.256637061 × 10 − 6	N·A − 2	0.0000
Elementary charge	e	e	1.602176634 × 10 − 19	C	0.0000
Electron mass	m	m	9.1093837139 × 10 − 31	kg	0.0000
Proton mass	m p	m p	1.6726219259 × 10 − 27	kg	0.0000
Down : 9 interchangeable constants
1. Fine-structure constant: e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 h c )	α	e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 h c ) Equation 1	7.2973525643 × 10 − 3	1	0.0000
1. a) Inverse-fine structure constant	α − 1	2 ε 0 h c / e 2 Equation 1	1.370035999 × 10 2	1	0.0000
2. von Klitzing constant	R K	μ 0 c s 0 2	2.581280744 × 10 4	Ω	0.0000
3. Planck constant	h	μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2	6.626070158 × 10 − 34	J·Hz − 1	0.0000
3. a) Conversion constant, K 0	K 0	1 / ( 2 μ 0 c e s 0 2 )	1.208994631 × 10 14	Hz·V − 1	unknown
4. Ratio e / h = 2 K 0	e / h	1 / ( μ 0 c e s 0 2 )	2.41798926 × 10 14	Hz·V − 1	0.0000
5. Josephson constant = 4 K 0	K J	2 / ( μ 0 c e s 0 2 )	4.835978524 × 10 14	Hz·V − 1	0.0000
6. Rydberg constant	R ∞	m / ( 8 μ 0 e 2 s 0 6 )	1.0973731568 × 10 7	m − 1	0.0000
7. Bohr radius	a 0	μ 0 e 2 s 0 4 / ( π m )	5.291772116 × 10 − 11	m	0.0000
8. Bohr magneton	μ B	μ 0 c e 3 s 0 2 / ( 4 π m )	9.274010015 × 10 − 24	J·T − 1	0.0000
9. Nuclear magneton	μ N	μ 0 c e 3 s 0 2 / ( 4 π m p )	5.050783626 × 10 − 27	J·T − 1	0.0000

^aIt is the difference with “2022 CODATA recommended values” in percent. https://physics.nist.gov/constants. ^bThis calculation is based on the values provided by Equation (1), Equation (2) and Equation (4). Structural constant s₀ has not yet been included in the physical quantities at NIST. The exact results from this article should change that and the structural constant of all atoms s₀ should be included in the universal physical constants.

2. Methods

This article uses a theoretical and experimental approach. First, the method of Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment in [3] was used. From there, a very precise inverse value of the fine-structure constant was obtained in Equation (1). From Equation (1) express the unknown Planck’s h = α − 1 e 2 μ 0 c / 2 in Equation (2). Since according to article in [2] Planck’s h is equal to h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 then

from these last two equations it follows s 0 = 1 2 = 8.27756 , that is, Equation (5).

Planck’s h thus derived from the Lecher line as an oscillator is consistent with QED, as can be seen from the article [2]. Thus, we accurately calculated the structure constant of all atoms s₀ in the simplest way. Table 2 shows the significance and value of this calculation of the structural constant of all atoms s₀, because through this constant all the values of all 9 interchangeable constants in that Table 2 are obtained exactly in accordance with NIST 2022 CODATA. This fulfills the prerequisites for declaring the structural constant of all atoms s₀ as a universal physical constant.

Maxwell theory with Theory of relativity give good result in describing most phenomena in the atom, such as the radiation of electromagnetic energy, discretization of states in the atom, the determination of stationary orbits, the determination and calculation of the structural constant of the atom s₀.

3. Results

The theory presented here explains that in atoms, in addition to the discrete states n⁺¹ = 1, 2, 3, 4 discrete states n⁻¹ = 1, 2, 3, 4, are also present. Therefore, for example, it is possible that in the discrete states n⁻¹ = 126 a hydrogen atom acquires the properties of a neutron. To achieve this, the existence of an electromagnetic oscillator inside the atom is assumed. This oscillator is described using the Lecher transmission line. The Lecher line does not actually exist within an atom however, a mathematical model of that line is used, just a mathematical is used in space exploration without the actual presence of planets in that model.

In the paper [2] it was shown that an oscillator derived from the Lecher line corresponds to an atom as an oscillator according to QED (Quantum electrodynamics). Thus, the emitted or absorbed electromagnetic energy of the atom is proportional to the natural frequency f_n of that oscillator and the quantity h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 , which by definition is Planck’s constant. Provided that s₀ is constant, which the measurements in Table 1 show, this is a different way to derive Planck’s constant within the framework of QED. In this case, the natural frequency of the oscillator f_n is equal to [2]:

f n = m c z 2 Z 2 8 e 2 μ 0 ( n ± 1 ) 2 s 0 6 1 − ( 1 n ± 1 z Z 2 s 0 2 ) 2

The maximum number Z = Z_max in periodic table, not counting isotopes, is determined by the velocity v_max, which can be reached by an electron (z = 1) in its first

shell (n^±1 = 1) relative to the speed of light, i.e. when β max = v max c = 1 n ± 1 z Z max 2 s 0 2 = 1 .

For z = 1 and n = 1 Z max = 2 s 0 2 = 137.035999166 . Since this number is related to the maximum speed of electrons in an atom, this number does not necessarily have to be a whole number.

4. Conclusions

First, the method of Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment in [3] was used. From there, a very precise inverse value of the fine-structure constant was obtained in Equation (1). From Equation (1) express the unknown Planck’s h = α − 1 e 2 μ 0 c / 2 in Equation (2). Since according to article in [2] Planck’s h is equal

to h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 then from these last two equations it follows s 0 = 1 2 = 8.27756 ,

that is, Equation (5). Thus, we accurately calculated the structure constant of all atoms s₀ in the simplest way. Table 2 shows the significance and value of this calculation of the structural constant of all atoms s₀, because through this constant all the values of all 9 interchangeable constants in that Table 2 are obtained exactly in accordance with NIST 2022 CODATA. This fulfills the prerequisites for declaring the structural constant of all atoms s₀ as a universal physical constant.

It is crucial for this article that it directly adopts the results for the fine-structure constant α = e 2 / ( 2 ε 0 h c ) obtained from the article [3]. It is important to note that in this expression Planck’s h is considered a variable, h = μ 0 c e 2 s 0 2 , the value of which has yet to be determined. By equating Planck’s h from the previous two expressions, it is possible to calculate the structural constant s₀ of all atoms:

s 0 = 1 2 = 8.27756 . As can be seen from Table 2, this has achieved an important

goal. Namely, now with the help of eight initial constants (s₀, B, 1/B, c, μ₀, e, m, m_p), nine other constants (α, R_K,h, e/h,K_J, R_∞, a₀, μ_B, μ_N; https://physics.nist.gov/constants) are converted into interchangeable. It is important to note that all of these 9 obtained quantities have values equal to those of NIST in 2022 CODATA. This means that the structural constant of all atoms derived here, s₀ = 8.7756, can be taken as a new universal physical constant, with which constant is all this simple and easy to do. The method of calculating all 9 physical quantities using that structural constant s₀ is listed in Table 2, see the formulas in that table.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Tomislav Ivezić, Davor Horvatić, Filip Vučić. Branko Kuzmanović supported the idea about the relativistic increase in the mass of the proton to the level of the mass of the neutron and thus the increase in the gravitational field of the isotope. I would like to thank Sonja Fištrek, Nikola Blažević, Srebrenka Ursić, Damir Vuk, Zlatko Voloder, Daobor Belamarić, Josip Silović, Krunomir Dvorski, Anton Lipovka, Eytan Suchard, Stipe Kutleša, Josip Zdenković, Perica Babić, Draženko Jakovac, Zdravko Berić, Slavica Lovrin, Mirjana Moslavac, Fikreta Kovačević, Ksenija Plantak, Branko Žaja, Strahimir Sučić, Jože Muhič and my family for their support in my research.

References

1.. Perkovac, M. (2026) Fine-Structure Constant Derived from the Structural Constant of All Atoms. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 14, 480-498. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2026.141025 10.4236/jamp.2026.141025https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2026.141025 Perkovac, M. 2026 Fine-Structure Constant Derived from the Structural Constant of All Atoms Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics 14 10.4236/jamp.2026.141025

2.. Perkovac, M. (2025) Discrete States in Atoms as a Consequence of Maxwell’s Equations and the Theory of Relativity. International Journal of Statistics and Data Science, 1, 19-37. https://www.hillpublisher.com/ArticleDetails/5225 https://doi.org/10.26855/ijsds.2025.12.003 10.26855/ijsds.2025.12.003https://doi.org/10.26855/ijsds.2025.12.003 Perkovac, M. 2025 Discrete States in Atoms as a Consequence of Maxwell’s Equations and the Theory of Relativity International Journal of Statistics and Data Science 1 10.26855/ijsds.2025.12.003

3.. Fan, X., Myers, T.G., Sukra, B.A.D. and Gabrielse, G. (2023) Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment. Physical Review Letters, 130, Article ID: 071801. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071801 https://doi.org/10.26226/m.6275705b66d5dcf63a311510 10.26226/m.6275705b66d5dcf63a311510https://doi.org/10.26226/m.6275705b66d5dcf63a311510 Fan, X. Myers, T.G. Sukra, B.A.D. Gabrielse, G. 2023 Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment Physical Review Letters 130 071801 ID 10.26226/m.6275705b66d5dcf63a311510

4.. Perkovac, M. (2024) New Physical Quantity and Unit of Type of Substance. Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 58. https://biomedres.us/fulltexts/BJSTR.MS.ID.009182.php https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2024.58.009182 10.26717/BJSTR.2024.58.009182https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2024.58.009182 Perkovac, M. 2024 New Physical Quantity and Unit of Type of Substance Journal of Scientific & Technical Research 58 10.26717/BJSTR.2024.58.009182