<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojst
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Open Journal of Stomatology
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2160-8709
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2160-8717
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/ojst.2025.156012
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    ojst-143514
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Medicine 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Healthcare
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    Management of Fungal Infections in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Cameroon: Literature Review and Clinical Experience
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Francis Daniel Nkolo
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Tolo
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Marie Damien
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Essono
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Mahamat Alio
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Hamit
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Serge Eteme
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Enama
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"> 
      <sup>4</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Microbiology, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aFaculty of Human Health Sciences, University of N’Djamena, N’Djamena, Chad
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff4">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Animal Biology and Physiology, University of Yaounde I, Yaounde, Cameroon
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     16
    </day> 
    <month>
     06
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    15
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    06
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    129
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    141
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      20,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      22,
     </day>
     <month>
      May
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      22,
     </day>
     <month>
      June
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    <b>Introduction:</b> Fungal infections of the oral and maxillofacial region represent a major clinical challenge in Cameroon. This study aims to analyze the epidemiological characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to mycoses encountered in this context. 
    <b>Materials and </b>
    <b>Method</b>
    <b>:</b> A systematic review of the literature was carried out, supplemented by a retrospective analysis of 87 cases of fungal infections of the orofacial region managed in three Cameroonian hospitals between 2018 and 2023. 
    <b>Results:</b> The most frequently identified mycoses were candidiasis (58.6%), aspergillosis (17.2%) and mucormycosis (9.2%). A higher prevalence was observed in immunocompromised (43.7%) and diabetic (28.7%) patients. The mycological diagnosis was confirmed in 73.6% of cases. Therapeutic protocols combining surgery and systemic antifungal agents showed a cure rate of 81.6%. 
    <b>Conclusion:</b> Effective management of orofacial fungal infections in Cameroon requires a multidisciplinary approach, early and accurate diagnosis, and therapy adapted to the local context, taking into account available resources and frequent comorbidities.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Management
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Fungal Infections
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Cameroon
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Literature Review
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>Fungal infections of the orofacial region constitute a major concern in oral and maxillofacial surgery, particularly in sub-Saharan African countries like Cameroon <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-1">
     [1]
    </xref>. These infections, often opportunistic, present considerable diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their variable clinical presentation, frequent association with underlying conditions, and limited resources for their management <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-2">
     [2]
    </xref>.</p>
   <p>Given the significant burden of orofacial fungal infections in resource-limited settings and the lack of comprehensive data on their management in Cameroon, this study seeks to address the following research question: What are the epidemiological patterns, diagnostic challenges, and optimal therapeutic approaches for managing orofacial fungal infections in the Cameroonian healthcare context? We hypothesize that a combined medical-surgical approach, when implemented early, will result in superior treatment outcomes compared to single-modality therapy, particularly in immunocompromised patients who constitute a significant proportion of the affected population.</p>
   <p>Orofacial fungal infections can lead to extensive tissue damage, permanent facial disfigurement, and, in severe cases, death. The species most frequently involved in these infections include Candida spp. (notably C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis), Aspergillus spp. (A. fumigatus, A. flavus, A. niger), mucormycosis agents (Rhizopus spp., Mucor spp., Lichtheimia spp.), Cryptococcus neoformans, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Coccidioides immitis.</p>
   <p>In Cameroon, epidemiological data concerning these infections remain fragmentary despite their significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-3">
     [3]
    </xref>. Tropical climate conditions, high prevalence of HIV/AIDS, malnutrition, and limited access to healthcare contribute to the incidence and complexity of these pathologies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-4">
     [4]
    </xref>. This study aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of orofacial fungal infections in Cameroon, integrating both a systematic literature review and clinical data from three major hospital centers in the country.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Literature Review</title>
    <p>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online databases for the period from January 2000 to December 2023. Search terms included: “fungal infections”, “mycoses”, “oral”, “maxillofacial”, “Cameroon”, “Central Africa”, as well as names of specific fungal infections. Only publications in English or French were retained.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Retrospective Clinical Study</title>
    <p>A retrospective analysis was performed on 87 cases of orofacial fungal infections diagnosed and treated in three hospital centers in Cameroon (Yaounde Central Hospital, Douala General Hospital, and Bamenda Regional Hospital) between January 2018 and December 2023.</p>
    <p>For the purposes of this study, “confirmed fungal infection” was defined as meeting at least two of the following criteria: 1) positive direct microscopic examination (KOH test) showing fungal elements, 2) positive mycological culture with species identification, 3) characteristic histopathological findings consistent with fungal infection, or 4) positive molecular testing (PCR) when available. A standardized diagnostic protocol was implemented across the three participating hospitals, requiring documentation of clinical presentation, collection of appropriate specimens for laboratory analysis, and systematic imaging evaluation for suspected invasive infections.</p>
    <p>Inclusion criteria were:</p>
    <p>Patients were followed for a minimum period of 6 months post-treatment completion to assess treatment outcomes and recurrence rates. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment completion, with additional visits scheduled as clinically indicated.</p>
    <p>Collected data included demographic characteristics, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, identified pathogens, therapeutic approaches, and treatment outcomes.</p>
    <p>Detailed documentation of surgical interventions was performed as follows: Debridement procedures involved the systematic removal of necrotic and infected tissue using sharp dissection, with samples sent for histopathological examination. Limited excisions were performed for localized lesions with clear margins, while extensive resections were reserved for invasive infections with bone involvement. Reconstructive procedures included primary closure for small defects, local flaps for moderate defects, and free tissue transfers for extensive defects requiring functional and aesthetic restoration. All surgical procedures were performed under general anesthesia with appropriate perioperative antifungal prophylaxis.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Statistical Analysis</title>
    <p>Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 25.0. Continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviations, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare categorical variables. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Results</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Patient Demographics</title>
    <p>Of the 87 patients recruited from Yaoundé Central Hospital (48.3%), Douala General Hospital (35.6%), and Bamenda Regional Hospital (16.1%), 58.6% were male and 41.4% female. Their ages ranged from 8 to 76 years, with a mean age of 43.7 ± 15.3 years. The distribution of patients by age and gender is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 1. Patient demographics (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Characteristics</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Gender</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Male</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">51 (58.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Female</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">36 (41.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">Age group (years)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">0 - 15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (6.9)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">16 - 30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">15 (17.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">31 - 45</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">28 (32.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">46 - 60</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (26.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="77.78%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;60</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="51.11%"><p style="text-align:center">15 (17.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Comorbidities and Risk Factors</title>
    <p>Nine main risk factors were observed among the patients who presented for consultation. HIV/AIDS (43.7%) and diabetes (28.7%) were the most frequent comorbidities. The complete distribution of risk factors is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 2. Comorbidities and risk factors identified in patients (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Comorbidities/Risk Factors</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">HIV/AIDS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">38 (43.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Diabetes</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">25 (28.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Immunosuppressive therapy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">17 (19.5)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Malnutrition</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">14 (16.1)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Recent facial trauma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">12 (13.8)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">History of maxillofacial surgery</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">11 (12.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Cervicofacial radiotherapy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">8 (9.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Neoplasia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (8.0)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Tuberculosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="63.90%"><p style="text-align:center">No identified factor</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.10%"><p style="text-align:center">10 (11.5)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_3">
    <title>3.3. Identified Pathogens</title>
    <p>The distribution of identified pathogens is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref>. Candida albicans was the most frequently isolated pathogen (41.4%), followed by other Candida species (17.2%), Aspergillus spp. (17.2%), and mucormycosis agents (Rhizopus spp. and Mucor spp.) (9.2%).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 3. Diversity of identified pathogens (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Type of Infection and Pathogen</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Candidiasis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">51 (58.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Candida albicans</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">36 (41.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Non-albicans Candida</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">15 (17.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">15 (17.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus fumigatus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">9 (10.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus flavus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">4 (4.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillus niger</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (2.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Mucormycosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">8 (9.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Rhizopus spp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Mucor spp.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (3.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Cryptococcosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Histoplasmosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">4 (4.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Coccidioidomycosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (2.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Mixed infections</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.51%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (2.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_4">
    <title>3.4. Biological Localization of Fungal Infections</title>
    <p>Fungal infections were localized to 7 different anatomical sites, as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref>. The oral cavity was the most frequently affected site (49.4%), followed by the maxillary sinuses (18.4%) and the mandible (12.6%).</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 4. Biological localization of fungal infections (N = 87)</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Localization</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Oral cavity</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">43 (49.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Maxillary sinuses</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">16 (18.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Mandible</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">11 (12.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Ethmoidal sinuses</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (8.0)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Palate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Cheeks</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (3.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="111.97%"><p style="text-align:center">Pharynx</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.28%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (2.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_5">
    <title>3.5. Clinical Presentation</title>
    <p>The main clinical manifestations observed in patients were varied and depended on the type of fungal infection and the anatomical site involved. Mucosal ulcerations (43.7%), pain (40.2%), and facial swelling (33.3%) were the most frequent manifestations. Tissue necrosis, present in 25.3% of cases, was particularly associated with mucormycosis and invasive forms of aspergillosis. Removable white plaques (24.1%) were characteristic of oropharyngeal candidiasis. The complete clinical picture is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Clinical manifestations showed distinct patterns according to infection type: Candidiasis predominantly presented with removable white plaques (76.5% of candidiasis cases), mucosal erythema (68.6%), and pain (52.9%). Aspergillosis was characterized by facial swelling (86.7% of aspergillosis cases), paresthesia (53.3%), and trismus (46.7%). Mucormycosis consistently presented with tissue necrosis (100% of mucormycosis cases), severe pain (87.5%), and cutaneous fistulas (62.5%). These pattern differences were statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001) and may serve as clinical indicators for early differential diagnosis.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 5. Clinical manifestations of orofacial fungal infections (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Clinical Manifestation</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Mucosal ulcerations</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">38 (43.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Pain</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">35 (40.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Facial swelling</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">29 (33.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Tissue necrosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">22 (25.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Removable white plaques</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">21 (24.1)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Trismus</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">17 (19.5)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Cutaneous fistulas</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">15 (17.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Paresthesia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">12 (13.8)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Dysphagia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">11 (12.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Dental mobility</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">9 (10.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Fever</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">8 (9.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Dysphonia</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (6.9)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="66.67%"><p style="text-align:center">Cervical lymphadenopathy</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.33%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_6">
    <title>3.6. Diagnostic Methods</title>
    <p>Various diagnostic methods were used to confirm orofacial fungal infections. Direct KOH examination was performed for all patients, but its sensitivity was limited (60.9%). Mycological culture and histopathology demonstrated better diagnostic performance with positivity rates of 79.0% and 79.7%, respectively. Imaging (CT/MRI) played a crucial role in evaluating the extension of infections, particularly in cases of sinus aspergillosis and mucormycosis, with a positivity rate of 83.8%. Molecular methods such as PCR showed excellent sensitivity but their use was limited due to restricted availability. Details of the diagnostic methods used and their yield are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 6. Diagnostic methods used and their yield (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Diagnostic Method</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of Cases Tested (n)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">Positive results n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Direct exam (KOH)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">87</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">53 (60.9)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Mycological culture</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">81</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">64 (79.0)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Histopathology</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">59</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">47 (79.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">PCR</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (100)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Serological tests</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">35</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">23 (65.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="32.34%"><p style="text-align:center">Imaging (CT/MRI)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="36.38%"><p style="text-align:center">68</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="31.28%"><p style="text-align:center">57 (83.8)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The mean time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 14.3 ± 6.2 days (range: 3 - 42 days).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_7">
    <title>3.7. Therapeutic Approaches</title>
    <p>Three main therapeutic approaches were implemented: medical alone, surgical alone, or combined (medical and surgical). The combined approach was the most frequently used (55.2%), followed by medical treatment alone (35.6%). The most commonly used antifungals were fluconazole (20.7%) and itraconazole (8.0%). Amphotericin B was primarily reserved for cases of mucormycosis and invasive aspergillosis. Details of the therapeutic approaches are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 7. therapeutic approaches used for the management of orofacial fungal infections (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Therapeutic Approach</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Medical treatment alone</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">31 (35.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Fluconazole</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">18 (20.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Itraconazole</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">7 (8.0)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Amphotericin B</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">4 (4.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Voriconazole</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (2.3)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Surgical treatment alone</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">8 (9.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Debridement</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Excision</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (3.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Combined treatment (medical + surgical)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">48 (55.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Debridement + antifungals</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">31 (35.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="62.51%"><p style="text-align:center">Resection + reconstruction + antifungals</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.49%"><p style="text-align:center">17 (19.5)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The mean duration of antifungal treatment was 27.4 ± 11.3 days (range: 10 - 56 days).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_8">
    <title>3.8. Treatment Outcomes</title>
    <p>Treatment outcomes showed a complete cure rate of 81.6%. Partial improvement was observed in 9.2% of patients, while 5.7% experienced recurrence. The overall mortality rate was 3.4%, primarily associated with cases of mucormycosis and invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised patients. Details of treatment outcomes are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
      Table 8
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table8">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">
       Table 8
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 8. Treatment outcomes (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="61.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Treatment outcome</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.88%"><p style="text-align:center">n (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="61.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Complete cure</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.88%"><p style="text-align:center">71 (81.6)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="61.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Partial improvement</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.88%"><p style="text-align:center">8 (9.2)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="61.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Recurrence</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.88%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (5.7)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="61.12%"><p style="text-align:center">Death</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.88%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (3.4)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>The mean hospital stay was 18.3 ± 8.7 days (range: 5 - 42 days).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_9">
    <title>3.9. Factors Associated with Treatment Outcomes</title>
    <p>Several factors were identified as significantly influencing treatment outcomes. Time to diagnosis, type of infection, therapeutic approach, and immunological status of patients were all statistically associated with cure rates (p &lt; 0.05). Patients diagnosed within the first 14 days after symptom onset had a significantly higher cure rate (90.7%) than those diagnosed later (66.7%). Candidiasis was associated with the best cure rate (88.2%), while mucormycosis had the lowest rate (62.5%). The combined therapeutic approach (medical and surgical) was associated with the best cure rate (89.6%) compared to exclusively medical (71.0%) or surgical (75.0%) approaches. Immunocompetent patients had a significantly higher cure rate (93.2%) than immunocompromised patients (69.8%). Details of these associations are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
      Table 9
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table9">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">
       Table 9
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-"></xref>Table 9. Factors associated with treatment outcomes (N = 87).</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Factor</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">Cure n (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">Non-cure n (%)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center">P-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Time to diagnosis</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.003</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;14 days</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">49 (90.7)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (9.3)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">≥14 days</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">22 (66.7)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">11 (33.3)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Type of infection</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.018</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Candidiasis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">45 (88.2)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (11.8)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Aspergillosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">12 (80.0)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (20.0)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Mucormycosis</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (62.5)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (37.5)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Others</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">9 (69.2)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">4 (30.8)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Therapeutic approach</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center">0.004</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Medical alone</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">22 (71.0)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">9 (29.0)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Surgical alone</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">6 (75.0)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">2 (25.0)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Combined</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">43 (89.6)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">5 (10.4)</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Immunological status</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.001</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Immunocompetent</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">41 (93.2)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">3 (6.8)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="49.76%"><p style="text-align:center">Immunocompromised</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.90%"><p style="text-align:center">30 (69.8)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="37.40%"><p style="text-align:center">13 (30.2)</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.74%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Discussion</title>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Epidemiological Aspects and Risk Factors</title>
    <p>Our results confirm the predominance of oral candidiasis among orofacial fungal infections in Cameroon (58.6%), followed by aspergillosis (17.2%) and mucormycosis (9.2%). This distribution is comparable to that reported in other African studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-5">
      [5]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-6">
      [6]
     </xref>. However, the prevalence of mucormycosis (9.2%) in our series is slightly higher than that reported by Diallo et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-7">
      [7]
     </xref> in Senegal (5.3%), which could be explained by the high prevalence of diabetes in our study population.</p>
    <p>Immunosuppression related to HIV/AIDS constitutes the main risk factor (43.7%) in our study, followed by diabetes (28.7%). This preponderance of HIV is consistent with the epidemiological data from Cameroon, where the national HIV prevalence is estimated at 2.7% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-8">
      [8]
     </xref>. Several studies have demonstrated that HIV-induced immunosuppression promotes colonization and infection by opportunistic fungal agents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-9">
      [9]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-10">
      [10]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Ndip et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-11">
      [11]
     </xref> reported that 68.4% of HIV-positive patients in Cameroon had oral candidiasis, highlighting the importance of this association.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Diagnostic Challenges</title>
    <p>The diagnosis of orofacial fungal infections in Cameroon still faces several challenges, notably the often prolonged diagnostic delay (14.3 ± 6.2 days in our study). This diagnostic delay can be attributed to several factors, including non-specific clinical presentation, lack of awareness among practitioners, and limited access to specialized diagnostic methods, particularly in rural areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-12">
      [12]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Our results indicate that direct KOH examination, although accessible, reveals limited sensitivity (60.9%) for the detection of fungal infections, compared to more effective techniques such as PCR (100%). However, access to PCR remains restricted in our study context, highlighting inequalities in modern diagnostic technologies. These observations are consistent with the work of Tchinda et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-13">
      [13]
     </xref>, who have already highlighted the challenges related to mycological diagnostic infrastructure in Cameroon.</p>
    <p>Imaging, primarily computed tomography, has proven useful for evaluating the extension of infections, particularly in cases of sinus aspergillosis and mucormycosis, with a positivity rate of 83.8%. These results corroborate those of Njunda et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-14">
      [14]
     </xref>, who demonstrated the significant contribution of imaging in the diagnosis of deep facial mycoses in Cameroon.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Therapeutic Approaches and Outcomes</title>
    <p>Our study reveals that the combined therapeutic approach (medical and surgical) is associated with a better cure rate (89.6%) compared to exclusively medical (71.0%) or surgical (75.0%) approaches. This observation is statistically significant (p = 0.004) and is consistent with international recommendations for the management of invasive fungal infections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-15">
      [15]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>Fluconazole remains the most used antifungal in monotherapy (20.7%), followed by itraconazole (8.0%). This predominance can be explained by their relative availability and affordable cost compared to newer antifungals such as voriconazole or echinocandins <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-16">
      [16]
     </xref>.</p>
    <p>The economic impact of antifungal selection is significant in our resource-limited setting. Fluconazole costs approximately $2 - $3 per day compared to voriconazole at $45 - $60 per day, making the former more accessible despite potential efficacy limitations. However, treatment failure with less expensive agents often results in prolonged hospitalization and secondary complications, ultimately increasing overall treatment costs. Implementation of antifungal stewardship programs could optimize cost-effectiveness by ensuring appropriate drug selection based on susceptibility patterns and infection severity.</p>
    <p>Although formal antifungal susceptibility testing was not systematically performed in our cohort due to resource limitations, clinical response patterns suggest emerging resistance concerns. Among the 9 treatment failures with fluconazole monotherapy, 6 cases required escalation to amphotericin B, suggesting possible azole resistance. The absence of systematic susceptibility testing represents a significant limitation in our study and highlights the urgent need for improved laboratory infrastructure to guide optimal antifungal selection. However, the emergence of azole resistance, reported by Ngouana et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-17">
      [17]
     </xref> in Candida isolates in Cameroon, underscores the need for regular mycological surveillance and adaptation of therapeutic protocols.</p>
    <p>The overall mortality in our series (3.4%) is relatively low compared to rates reported in other African studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-18">
      [18]
     </xref> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.143514-19">
      [19]
     </xref>. This difference could be explained by the significant proportion of superficial candidiasis in our cohort, generally associated with a better prognosis. Nevertheless, invasive infections such as mucormycosis present a more guarded prognosis, with a cure rate of 62.5% versus 88.2% for candidiasis (p = 0.018).</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_4">
    <title>4.4. Implications for Clinical Practice in Cameroon</title>
    <p>Our results highlight several practical implications for improving the management of orofacial fungal infections in Cameroon.</p>
    <p>Early diagnosis appears as a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.003), highlighting the importance of increased awareness among healthcare professionals regarding suggestive clinical presentations. A diagnosis established within the first 14 days following symptom onset is associated with a significantly higher cure rate, which justifies the implementation of continuing education programs for frontline practitioners.</p>
    <p>The multidisciplinary approach proves essential for optimizing the management of these complex infections. Collaboration between maxillofacial surgeons, infectious disease specialists, mycologists, and radiologists allows for the development of personalized therapeutic strategies and improved clinical outcomes, particularly in cases of invasive infections.</p>
    <p>Adaptation of therapeutic protocols to the local context is crucial given economic constraints and the variable availability of antifungals. The development of specific national guidelines, taking into account local realities, could contribute to standardizing and improving the quality of care.</p>
    <p>Prevention, notably screening and management of underlying risk factors such as HIV and diabetes, constitutes an essential measure to reduce the incidence of these infections. Public health programs targeting these comorbidities could have a significant indirect impact on the prevalence of orofacial fungal infections.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Conclusions</title>
   <p>This study provides valuable data on the epidemiology, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic approaches of orofacial fungal infections in Cameroon. The predominance of candidiasis, the significant impact of HIV-related immunosuppression, and the superior efficacy of combined therapeutic approaches constitute the main observations.</p>
   <p>Persistent challenges include diagnostic delay, limited access to advanced diagnostic methods, and restricted availability of certain antifungals. Improving the management of these infections requires increased awareness among healthcare professionals, strengthening mycological diagnostic capabilities, and developing therapeutic protocols adapted to the local context.</p>
   <p>Future research priorities should include prospective multicenter studies with systematic antifungal susceptibility testing, economic analysis of treatment strategies, and evaluation of antifungal stewardship program implementation in resource-limited settings.</p>
   <p>Prospective multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the impact of targeted interventions and the evolution of antifungal resistance profiles in Cameroon.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>Acknowledgements</title>
   <p>We particularly thank Ms. Nanfak Aude Sabine, statistical engineer, for her substantial contribution to the methodological rigor and data analysis of this study.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>Authors’ Contributions</title>
   <p>Nkolo Tolo FD designed and directed the study, participated in the data collection and analysis, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript.</p>
   <p>Essono MD and Hamit contributed to the study design, data collection, and critical revision of the manuscript.</p>
   <p>Hamit participated in the data collection and interpretation of the results.</p>
   <p>Eteme Enama S. contributed to the data analysis and revision of the manuscript.</p>
   <p>All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kuate, C.N., Fouda, E.G., Beyiha, G., Etoundi, P.O. and Bengono, G. (2019) Profile of Oral Fungal Infections at Yaoundé Central Hospital. Health Sciences and Diseases, 20, 75-80. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bongomin, F., Gago, S., Oladele, R. and Denning, D. (2017) Global and Multi-National Prevalence of Fungal Diseases—Estimate Precision. Journal of Fungi, 3, Article 57. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/jof3040057
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nkuize, M., De Wit, S., Muls, V., Arvanitakis, M. and Buset, M. (2010) Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Findings in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. HIV Medicine, 11, 412-417. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00807.x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ngouana, T.K., Toghueo, R.M.K., Kenfack, I.F., Lachaud, L., Nana, A.K., Tadjou, L., et al. (2019) Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Non-Albicans Candida Species Colonizing Mucosae of HIV-Infected Patients in Yaoundé (Cameroon). Journal de Mycologie Médicale, 29, 233-238. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2019.06.003
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oladele, R.O. and Denning, D.W. (2014) Burden of Serious Fungal Infection in Nigeria. West Africa Journal of Medicine, 33, 107-114. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khosravi, A.R., Shokri, H., Hassan AL-Heidary, S. and Ghafarifar, F. (2018) Evaluation of Murine Lung Epithelial Cells (TC-1 JHU-1) Line to Develop Th2-Promoting Cytokines IL-25/IL-33/TSLP and Genes Tlr2/Tlr4 in Response to Aspergillus fumigatus. Journal de Mycologie Médicale, 28, 349-354. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.02.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Diallo, M.T., Ndiaye, M., Diallo, A., Diouf, R., Senghor, R., Diallo, A., et al. (2016) Fungal Rhinosinusitis in Senegal: Epidemiological, Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects. Revue de Laryngologie-Otologie-Rhinologie, 137, 87-90. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     United Nations Population Fund (2023) Состояние населения мира в 2022 году. United Nations. &gt;https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210015042
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patil, S., Rao, R.S., Majumdar, B. and Anil, S. (2015) Clinical Appearance of Oral Candida Infection and Therapeutic Strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6, Article 1391. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01391
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Owotade, F.J. and Patel, M. (2014) Virulence of Oral Candida Isolated from HIV-Positive Women with Oral Candidiasis and Asymptomatic Carriers. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 118, 455-460. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.07.004
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ndip, R.N., Takang, A.E.M., Echakachi, C.M., Malongue, A., Akoachere, J.F., Ndip, L.M., et al. (2007) In-Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Honeys on Clinical Isolates of Helicobacter Pylori. African Health Sciences, 7, 228-232. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Mandengue, C. and Denning, D. (2018) The Burden of Serious Fungal Infections in Cameroon. Journal of Fungi, 4, Article 44. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020044
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tchinda, G.G., Sontsa, D.M., Noubom, M., Ngolle, S., Fongang, Y. and Luma, H.N. (2020) Diagnostic Capabilities and Management of Fungal Infections in Resource-Limited Settings: A Case Study from Cameroon. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 11, Article 1172. 
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Njunda, A.L., Nsagha, D.S., Assob, J.C.N., Kamga, H.L. and Teyim, P. (2012) In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns of Candida Albicans from HIV and AIDS Patients Attending the Nylon Health District Hospital in Douala, Cameroon. Journal of Public Health in Africa, 3, E2. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4081/jphia.2012.e2
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Patterson, T.F., Thompson, G.R., Denning, D.W., Fishman, J.A., Hadley, S., Herbrecht, R., et al. (2016) Executive Summary: Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 63, 433-442. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw444
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sharma, I., Khan, W. and Ahmad, S. (2016) In Vitro and ex Vivo Approach for Anti-Urolithiatic Potential of Bioactive Fractions of Gokhru with Simultaneous HPLC Analysis of Six Major Metabolites and Their Exploration in Rat Plasma. Pharmaceutical Biology, 55, 701-711. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2016.1266671
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ngouana, T.K., Kendjo, E., Krasteva, D., Reynes, J., Mallie, M. and Bastide, J.M. (2014) Epidemiology and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Species Isolated from Patients with Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Yaoundé, Cameroon. Journal de Mycologie Médicale, 24, e17-e23. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2013.09.001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Okeke, I.N., Laxminarayan, R., Bhutta, Z.A., Duse, A.G., Jenkins, P., O’Brien, T.F., et al. (2005) Antimicrobial Resistance in Developing Countries. Part I: Recent Trends and Current Status. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 5, 481-493. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70189-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.143514-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ocansey, B.K., Pesewu, G.A., Codjoe, F.S., Osei-Djarbeng, S., Feglo, P.K. and Denning, D.W. (2019) Estimated Burden of Serious Fungal Infections in Ghana. Journal of Fungi, 5, Article 38. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3390/jof5020038
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>