<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article">
 <front>
  <journal-meta>
   <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">
    jhrss
   </journal-id>
   <journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>
     Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies
    </journal-title>
   </journal-title-group>
   <issn pub-type="epub">
    2328-4862
   </issn>
   <issn publication-format="print">
    2328-4870
   </issn>
   <publisher>
    <publisher-name>
     Scientific Research Publishing
    </publisher-name>
   </publisher>
  </journal-meta>
  <article-meta>
   <article-id pub-id-type="doi">
    10.4236/jhrss.2025.131006
   </article-id>
   <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">
    jhrss-141093
   </article-id>
   <article-categories>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
     <subject>
      Articles
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
    <subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2">
     <subject>
      Business 
     </subject>
     <subject>
       Economics
     </subject>
    </subj-group>
   </article-categories>
   <title-group>
    The Impact of Work-Family Conflict on Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction of Female Prison Officers
   </title-group>
   <contrib-group>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Nana Yaa
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Amankwah
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"> 
      <sup>1</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Daniel Agyemfour-Agyemang
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Sarpong
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"> 
      <sup>2</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
    <contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple">
     <name name-style="western">
      <surname>
       Daniel
      </surname>
      <given-names>
       Nkansah
      </given-names>
     </name> 
     <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"> 
      <sup>3</sup>
     </xref>
    </contrib>
   </contrib-group> 
   <aff id="aff1">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Management and Public Administration, Accra Technical University, Accra, Ghana
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff2">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Secretaryship and Management Studies, Koforidua Technical University, Koforidua, Ghana
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <aff id="aff3">
    <addr-line>
     aDepartment of Human Resource and Organisational Development, Kwame Nkrumah University of Sciences and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
    </addr-line> 
   </aff> 
   <pub-date pub-type="epub">
    <day>
     24
    </day> 
    <month>
     01
    </month>
    <year>
     2025
    </year>
   </pub-date> 
   <volume>
    13
   </volume> 
   <issue>
    01
   </issue>
   <fpage>
    91
   </fpage>
   <lpage>
    112
   </lpage>
   <history>
    <date date-type="received">
     <day>
      16,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year>
    </date>
    <date date-type="published">
     <day>
      7,
     </day>
     <month>
      October
     </month>
     <year>
      2024
     </year> 
    </date> 
    <date date-type="accepted">
     <day>
      7,
     </day>
     <month>
      March
     </month>
     <year>
      2025
     </year> 
    </date>
   </history>
   <permissions>
    <copyright-statement>
     © Copyright 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. 
    </copyright-statement>
    <copyright-year>
     2014
    </copyright-year>
    <license>
     <license-p>
      This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
     </license-p>
    </license>
   </permissions>
   <abstract>
    The emergence of a heavy workload has disrupted the vital relationship that people have established between work and family and set the stage for the occurrence of work-family conflict. Based on this accession, this study examined the impact of work-family conflict on the job and life satisfaction of female prison officers from the sub-Saharan African context, specifically Ghana. A purposive sampling technique was employed and a sample size of 311 female prison officers from the Greater Accra and Eastern Regional command were selected. To analyse the data, the study employed partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) to test the hypotheses and regression confirmation of the SEM results. The study revealed that work-family conflict has a positive significant effect on job satisfaction. However, a negative relationship was established between work-family conflict and the life satisfaction of female prison officers. This study deepens our understanding of how work-family conflict influences job and life satisfaction in a collectivist culture, as well as points to the establishment of measures to reduce work-family conflict which can lead to a high level of life dissatisfaction among female prison officers.
   </abstract>
   <kwd-group> 
    <kwd>
     Work-Family Conflict
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Female Prison Officers
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Job Satisfaction
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Life Satisfaction
    </kwd> 
    <kwd>
      Ghana
    </kwd>
   </kwd-group>
  </article-meta>
 </front>
 <body>
  <sec id="s1">
   <title>1. Introduction</title>
   <p>The modern workforce is experiencing profound shifts, with an increasing number of individuals navigating the complexities of balancing work responsibilities with familial obligations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-27">
     Grandey, Cordeiro, &amp; Crouter, 2018
    </xref>). Work-family conflict refers to the challenges individuals face when the demands of their work roles interfere with their ability to fulfil family responsibilities, and vice versa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-66">
     Voydanoff, 2017
    </xref>). In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the unique experiences and challenges faced by women in the workforce, particularly in traditionally male-dominated professions such as law enforcement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-20">
     Cromartie, 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-65">
     Tims, 2024
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-57">
     Redick, 2024
    </xref>). One such profession in which the interplay between work and family roles is particularly salient is policing, where the demands of maintaining public safety often clash with personal and family commitments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-69">
     Yanchus &amp; Eby, 2022
    </xref>). Work-family conflict occurs when family and work demands are incompatible (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-61">
     Šimunić &amp; Gregov, 2012
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-63">
     Sousa et al., 2023
    </xref>). Theoretical and empirical studies indicate that work-family conflict functions in a bidirectional manner: work-to-family (WIF) and family-to-work conflict (FIW) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-43">
     Matthews, Kath, &amp; Barnes-Farrell, 2010
    </xref>). When roles related to a person’s job interfere with the roles of the family, it is termed work-to-family. On the other hand, family-to-work conflict arises when family activities interfere with job roles. The cause of work-family-conflict has been classified into three main groups such as time-based conflict, mental base conflict, behaviour base conflict (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-67">
     Wang, 2024
    </xref>). Time-based conflict refers to the difficulty an individual has in balancing work and family within a short time frame, whereas mental-based conflict is concerned with the mental stress one experiences in one domain, allowing it to affect the needs of another (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-67">
     Wang, 2024
    </xref>). Lastly, the behavioural base conflict deals with an individual displaying different expectations of behaviour in professional and family settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-67">
     Wang, 2024
    </xref>). Several studies have revealed that the clash between family and work roles has an undesirable effect on an individual’s well-being and health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-8">
     Almutairi, 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-3">
     Ádám, Györffy, &amp; Susánszky, 2008
    </xref>). In particular, female prison officers may encounter distinct challenges stemming from the intersection of their gender roles with the demanding nature of police work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-32">
     Kalliath et al., 2017
    </xref>). Despite progress in gender equality within law enforcement, women continue to be underrepresented and face unique barriers related to work-family balance and job satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-39">
     Lazazzara, Tims, &amp; de Bloom, 2021
    </xref>).</p>
   <p>By virtue of the significance of family and work, a person’s job, family, and life satisfaction are hinged on how one can balance the two domains. In this study, satisfaction was measured in two dimensions: job satisfaction and life satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-10">
     Aryee, Fields, &amp; Luk, 1999
    </xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-75">
     Zhao et al. (2011)
    </xref> defined job satisfaction as the degree to which workers in an organisation have a positive attitude towards their job. In other words, the level of satisfaction is determined by the level of job complexity and job importance, which differs among individuals. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-1">
     Abugre (2014)
    </xref> also defined job satisfaction as an individual’s subjective feeling that reﬂects the extent to which his or her needs are met by the job. Studies have shown that job satisfaction is directly linked to employees’ working conditions, and that this level of satisfaction is affected by individual attitudes and personality traits. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-40">
     Lee et al. (2012)
    </xref>, job satisfaction is directly related to employees and overall organisational performance. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-1">
     Abugre (2014)
    </xref>, employees with low levels of job satisfaction may desire to leave their organisation if they are not empowered to change their job characteristics.</p>
   <p>Life satisfaction has been identified as another crucial element that plays a critical role in a person’s subjective well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-73">
     Zhang &amp; Liu, 2011
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-2">
     Achour et al., 2014
    </xref>). A positive appraisal of one’s life conditions, measured against predetermined expectations of the individual, is termed life satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-19">
     Cribb, 2000
    </xref>). It is important to note that these standards are not externally imposed but rather self-imposed. In other words, the judgment of satisfaction is based on the comparison of a person’s actual situation with what he claims to be his ideal standard. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-42">
     Lippman et al. (2011)
    </xref>, life satisfaction deals with the conviction that a person has about how well he or she can track his or her personal life and be happy with one’s own life. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-10">
     Aryee et al. (1999)
    </xref>, life satisfaction is a function of both job and family satisfaction. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-45">
     Michel et al. (2011)
    </xref> also affirmed that job and family satisfaction were strong predictors of life satisfaction.</p>
   <p>In line with the above debate, this study proposes that work-family conflict can greatly influence one’s level of satisfaction with their job or life. Like any other security service in the world, Ghana’s prison service is male-dominated and poses several gender-related challenges. Within the context of law enforcement, female prison officers face unique challenges in balancing work and family responsibilities, which necessitate a deeper understanding of their experiences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-69">
     Yanchus &amp; Eby, 2022
    </xref>). The Ghana prison service is one of many organisations under the Ministry of the Interior of Ghana. Female prison officers in Ghana may face cultural, organisational, and societal barriers that influence their experiences of work-family conflict and satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-39">
     Lazazzara, Tims, &amp; de Bloom, 2021
    </xref>). Despite the increasing level of research in this area, there remains a gap in understanding the specific experiences of female prison officers regarding work-family conflict and satisfaction, such as job and life, in the sub-Sahara context, specifically Ghana.</p>
   <p>Although the literature suggests that work-family conflict significantly affects job satisfaction among various occupational groups, it is unclear how this relationship manifests among female prison officers, particularly in Ghana. Examining these dynamics within the Ghana prison service can provide valuable insights into the broader issues of gender, work-family balance, and organisational support in law enforcement settings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-47">
     Moen, Kelly, &amp; Huang, 2018
    </xref>). In line with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-38">
     Lambert et al. (2017)
    </xref>, the outcomes of work-family conflict cannot simply be universalised but contextualised across cultures. Therefore, there is a need for further empirical research on work-family conflict in developing countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-33">
     Karatepe &amp; Badar, 2006
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-34">
     Karatepe, Kilic, &amp; Isiksel, 2008
    </xref>). Hence, this study seeks to address this gap by investigating the relationship between work-family conflict and satisfaction, including job, and life satisfaction, among female prison officers in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana, and Eastern Region of Ghana. By addressing these gaps, this study seeks to provide insights that can inform organisational policies and evidence-based interventions aimed at supporting the well-being and retention of female prison officers within Ghana’s prison services. In conclusion, this study aims to explore the effect of work-family conflict on the job and life satisfaction of female prison officers based on spillover theory. Thus, this study examined the following research questions:</p>
   <p>RQ1. What is the effect of work-family conflict on job satisfaction?</p>
   <p>RQ2. What is the effect of work-family conflict on the life satisfaction of female prison officers in Ghana?</p>
  </sec><sec id="s2">
   <title>2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development</title>
   <sec id="s2_1">
    <title>2.1. Work-Family Conflict (WFC) and Job Satisfaction</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>The effect of work-family conflict experienced by working mothers affects life stress and depression, with the degree of depression varying according to job satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-37">
      Kim &amp; Lee, 2017
     </xref>). Employees experiencing depression may feel that they lack the ability to work effectively. These feelings result in dissatisfaction, leading to absenteeism and low productivity. The concept of work-life conflict gives rise to a meaningful measure of how individuals mentally process their work environment and private life environment, which helps to explain their job satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-23">
      Dorenkamp &amp; Ruhle 2019
     </xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-50">
      Oliver (2014)
     </xref>, satisfaction is the pleasurable fulfilment of expectations or needs. Job satisfaction can also be defined as, a pleasant or positive emotional state that results from an individual assessment of work or experience (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-17">
      Chordiya et al., 2019
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-#HYPERLINK  l R55">
      Ratnaningrum et al., 2024
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-#HYPERLINK  l R53">
      Qureshi et al., 2019
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-13">
      Baluyos et al., 2019
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-24">
      Eliyana &amp; Pradana 2020
     </xref>). That is, positive or negative emotions emanate from the evaluation of one’s acceptance of the work done. Job satisfaction has been identified as a vital indicator of employees’ feelings towards their job and a predictor of work behaviour such as motivation, absenteeism, and performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-51">
      Onyemah et al., 2018
     </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-4">
      Afaq &amp; Arshad, 2022
     </xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-1">
      Abugre (2014)
     </xref>, employees with low levels of job satisfaction may desire to leave their organisation if they are not empowered to vary their job characteristics. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-40">
      Lee et al. (2012)
     </xref>, job satisfaction is directly related to employee and overall organisational performance. That is, when an individual evaluates his or her work and feels a sense of happiness, it can lead to higher performance which can result in a sense of happiness at home.</p>
    <p>For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-63">
      Sousa et al. (2023)
     </xref> study on the moderating effect of work-family conflict in the link between perceived organisational support and job and life satisfaction among Portuguese workers found a significant positive relationship between perceived organisational support and employees’ job and life satisfaction. Again work-family conflict was found to affect the association between perceived organisational support and work-life satisfaction. Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-23">
      Dorenkamp and Ruhle (2019)
     </xref>, in their work on work-life conflict, professional commitment, and job satisfaction among academics in Germany, revealed that work-to-life conflict and continuance commitment act as stressors that reduce job satisfaction. Neither life-to-work conflict nor normative commitment had a direct effect on job satisfaction, but their interactions had a positive effect on job satisfaction. Furthermore, in the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-26">
      Gabini and Salessi (2019)
     </xref>, on work-family interfase and job performance, using Job satisfaction as mediator revealed that an indirect effects of work-family interfase dimensions (conflict and enrichment) on job performance with job satisfaction being statically significant, which indicated partial mediation. Also, in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-44">
      McDowell, Matthews, Matthews, Aaron, Edmondson, and Ward (2019)
     </xref>, on the topic “the price of success: balancing the effects of entrepreneurial commitment, work-family conflict and emotional exhaustion on job satisfaction” among small and micro firm business owners in United State revealed that being committed to the business and doing what one love is not enough to overcome the negative consequences that come from work-family conflict. The negative influence of emotional exhaustion on job satisfaction was greater than that of entrepreneurial commitment on job satisfaction. Again, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-35">
      Ke, Zhou, and Zhu (2019)
     </xref> in their work on the impact of police work-family conflict on turnover intentions, the Roles of Organisational Support and Job Burnout showed that work-family conflict and job burnout have a significant and positive correlation with turnover intentions. Furthermore, their study showed that job burnout played a partial mediating role in the relationship between work-family conflict and turnover intentions whereas organisational support played a moderating role between work-family conflict and burnout.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-58">
      Rhee, Park, and Lee (2020)
     </xref>, on the topic “pathways from workplace flexibility to turnover intention: Role of work-family conflict, family-work conflict, and job satisfaction” among low wage workers in South Korea. This study found a significant relationship between workplace flexibility and turnover intention. This indicates that access to less workplace flexibility is associated with higher work-family and family-work conflicts. This implies that Higher work-family conflict decreased job satisfaction, and lower job satisfaction was significantly associated with higher turnover. That is, the mediation effects showed that work-family conflict and job satisfaction were significant mediators of the effect of workplace flexibility on turnover intention. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-62">
      Siswanto, Masyhuri, Hidayati, Ridwan, and Hanif (2022)
     </xref>, in their study on the impact of work-family conflict on job satisfaction and job stress: mediation model from Islamic bank employees in Indonesia. The results showed that work-family conflict was a significant predictor of job satisfaction and job stress. Furthermore, social support mediated the relationship between work-family conflict and job stress. However, organisational commitment was not found to mediate these two variables.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-36">
      Khan (2022)
     </xref> found that work-family conflict has a significant effect on job satisfaction. In addition, in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-16">
      Cha and Lee (2024)
     </xref> on the impact of work-family conflict on depression among Korean women during the COVID-19 pandemic, the moderated mediating effect of job satisfaction showed that the level of depression varied significantly according to the levels of subjective health status, annual household income, and satisfaction with the husband’s contribution to household chores. Again, the study revealed that depression among Korean working mothers exhibited a positive correlation with work-family conflict and overall life stress and a negative correlation with job satisfaction. Life stress mediates the effect on depression, thereby increasing work-family conflict and decreasing job satisfaction.</p>
    <p>Also, a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-49">
      Nugroho, Soepatini, Wujoso, and Waskito (2024)
     </xref>, on the Effect of Work-Family Conflict and Job Stress on Performance with the mediation role of Job Satisfaction among nurses in Indonesia found that work-family conflict had a negative and insignificant effect on performance, but work-family conflict had a negative and significant effect on job satisfaction. Work stress also has a negative and insignificant effect on performance and job satisfaction. Work-family conflict was found to have a negative and significant effect on performance which was mediated by job satisfaction; however, work stress had a negative but insignificant effect on performance which was mediated by job satisfaction. In line with these issues, many researchers have demonstrated a significant negative correlation between work-family conflict and job satisfaction. Based on the findings of previous studies, work-family conflict leads to lower job satisfaction. Hence, this study hypothesis that:</p>
    <p>H1: Work-family conflict negatively influences job satisfaction of female prison officer.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_2">
    <title>2.2. Work-Family Conflict (WFC) and Life Satisfaction</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>The emergence of a heavy workload has disrupted the vital relationship that people have established between work and family and set the stage for the occurrence of work-family conflict (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-70">
      Yıldırım &amp; Acar, 2018
     </xref>). Work plays a significant role in everyone’s lives, just like a family. As pressure on working life increases, conflict becomes inevitable. Hence, life satisfaction results from the satisfaction with many aspects of a person’s life, such as their job and family. Thus, both job and family satisfaction result in life satisfaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-5">
      Afzal &amp; Farooqi, 2014
     </xref>). Life satisfaction is related to a person’s understanding of their life being on the right track and being happy with their own life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-42">
      Lippman et al., 2011
     </xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-68">
      Wang and Peng (2017)
     </xref>, life satisfaction is a complete assessment of feelings and attitudes toward an individual’s life at a specific time, ranging from negative to positive. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-70">
      Yıldırım and Acar (2018)
     </xref> defined life satisfaction as the balance and harmony between one’s working and personal lives which serves as the main source of happiness, peace, and satisfaction in general. That is, balance and harmony should determine the quality of family and social relationships, as well as the inner peace of the individual, while increasing work performance. In line with these definitions, life satisfaction can be considered an assessment of one’s total life and happiness with one’s current state of life. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-45">
      Michel et al. (2011)
     </xref>, job and family satisfaction are strong predictors of life satisfaction.</p>
    <p>For example, in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-6">
      Akram, Bibi, Ashfaq Ahmed, and Kausar (2022)
     </xref>, on work-family conflict and suicidal ideation among physicians in Pakistan, the moderating role of perceived life satisfaction, found that perceived life satisfaction negatively correlates to work-family conflict and suicidal ideation. Physicians with higher levels of perceived life satisfaction had lower levels of work-family conflict and suicidal ideation. Perceived life satisfaction was found to have a negative effect on the link between work-family conflict and suicidal ideation. This indicates that perceived life satisfaction may play a role in decreasing the level of work-family conflict and suicidal ideation among physicians. In addition, in a study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-71">
      Yucel (2017)
     </xref> on work-to-family conflict and life satisfaction, the moderating role of type of employment. The study found that work-to-family conflict is negatively correlated with life satisfaction, and that this negative correlation is stronger for those who are self-employed. Again, in the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-72">
      Yucel and Minnotte (2017)
     </xref> on workplace support and life satisfaction, the mediating roles of work-to-family conflict and mental health. Their results showed that work-to-family conflict fully mediated the effect of organisational support on life satisfaction and partially mediated the effect of supervisor support on life satisfaction. Moreover, poor mental health fully mediates the effects of both organisational and supervisor support on life satisfaction. However, coworker support did not mediate either of these variables.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-68">
      Wang and Peng (2017)
     </xref> examined the mediating effects of job satisfaction and life satisfaction on the relationship between work-family conflict and depression in professional women. The results showed a positive relationship between work-to-family conflict and depression in professional women. In other words, professional women with higher WFC levels were more likely to have higher levels of depression. On the other hand, life and job satisfaction were found to partially mediate the effects of work-family conflict and depression. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-52">
      Qiu and Fan (2015)
     </xref> examined family boundary characteristics, work-family conflict, and life satisfaction using a moderated mediation model. The results showed that employees’ family flexibility was negatively related to their perceived work interference with work-family conflict (WIF) and family-work conflict, and that work-family conflict mediated the relationship between family flexibility and life satisfaction; the indirect effect of family flexibility on life satisfaction via work-family conflict was found to be stronger for individuals with higher family permeability.</p>
    <p>In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-70">
      Yıldırım and Acar (2018)
     </xref> studied the influence of work-family conflict on organisational cynicism and the mediating role of life satisfaction. Their study revealed that work-family conflict had a significant positive effect on life satisfaction. In other words, the life satisfaction of employees with family problems due to their work decreases. The study results showed that work-family conflict had a significant influence on organisational cynicism. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-75">
      Zhao, Qu, and Ghiselli (2011)
     </xref> examined the relationship between work-family conflict and job and life satisfaction among hotel sales managers and found that family-work conflict is negatively linked with life satisfaction. Again, the study found that work-family conflict and family-work conflict have significant negative correlations with an individual’s affective reaction to one’s job, and affective reaction, rather than cognitive appraisal, had a significant positive correlation with life satisfaction.</p>
    <p>From the studies highlighted above, the positive and negative experiences of individuals can be the source of overall life satisfaction as well as the determination of their inner peace and happiness. Many researchers have demonstrated a significantly negative correlation between work-family conflict and life satisfaction. Based on the findings of previous studies, work-family conflict leads to lower life satisfaction. Therefore, the study proposes the following hypothesis:</p>
    <p>H2: Work-family conflict has a negative correlation with life satisfaction.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s2_3">
    <title>2.3. Conceptual Framework</title>
    <p>The conceptual framework that explains how the constructs in this study interact with one another is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">
      Figure 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <fig id="fig1" position="float">
     <label>Figure 1</label>
     <caption>
      <title>Figure 1. Conceptual model.</title>
     </caption>
     <graphic mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://html.scirp.org/file/2831394-rId16.jpeg?20250312044126" />
    </fig>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s3">
   <title>3. Research Method</title>
   <sec id="s3_1">
    <title>3.1. Study Design/Sampling/Population and Sample Size</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>This study adopts a quantitative research approach with an explanatory and descriptive design. This study aimed to determine the effect of work-family conflict on the job and life satisfaction of female prison officers in Ghana. The study sample was selected via purposive and convenience sampling techniques for questionnaire distribution owing to the operational nature of the service personnel. The purpose of using the purposive sampling technique is to allow the researcher to use the researcher’s own judgment regarding the selection of the region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-18">
      Cochran, 1977
     </xref>). The total population for this study was 6821, with an estimated sample size of 378, based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-46">
      Miller and Brewer’s (2003)
     </xref> sample selection formula.</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mi>
          N 
        </mi> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            [ 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             + 
           </mo> 
           <mi>
             N 
           </mi> 
           <msup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mi>
                α 
              </mi> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </msup> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ] 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>where,</p>
    <p>N = total population = 6,821;</p>
    <p>n = sample size and;</p>
    <p>α = significance level = 0.05.</p>
    <p>
     <math display="inline" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mrow> 
       <mi>
         n 
       </mi> 
       <mo>
         = 
       </mo> 
       <mrow> 
        <mrow> 
         <mn>
           6821 
         </mn> 
        </mrow> 
        <mo>
          / 
        </mo> 
        <mrow> 
         <mrow> 
          <mo>
            [ 
          </mo> 
          <mrow> 
           <mn>
             1 
           </mn> 
           <mo>
             + 
           </mo> 
           <mn>
             6821 
           </mn> 
           <msup> 
            <mrow> 
             <mrow> 
              <mo>
                ( 
              </mo> 
              <mrow> 
               <mn>
                 0.05 
               </mn> 
              </mrow> 
              <mo>
                ) 
              </mo> 
             </mrow> 
            </mrow> 
            <mn>
              2 
            </mn> 
           </msup> 
          </mrow> 
          <mo>
            ] 
          </mo> 
         </mrow> 
        </mrow> 
       </mrow> 
      </mrow> 
     </math></p>
    <p>Therefore n = 377.84; hence acceptable size 378.</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s3_2">
    <title>3.2. Research Instrument</title>
    <p>The study questionnaire was an adapted standard structured instrument that had already been validated in previous studies. The questionnaire was organised into three key sections. Section A comprised questions designed to collect demographic information from the respondents. Section B contains questions measuring work-family conflict, and Section C includes questions on job and life satisfaction. Out of the 400 self-administered questionnaires, 311 were returned for data analysis, resulting in a response rate of 77.75%.</p>
    <p>Work-family conflict was measured using a scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-48">
      Netemeyer et al. (1996)
     </xref>. The scale consisted of ten (10) items. The first five (5) items measured work-to-family conflict. A sample item is “the demands of my work interfere with my home and family life”. The last five (5) items on the scale measured family-to-work conflict. A sample item is “The demands of my family or spouse/partner interfere with work-related activities. Respondents were required to respond on a seven (7) point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Responses are scored from 1 to 7 (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Moderately Disagree, 3 = disagree, 4 = neutral, 5 = agree, 6 = Moderately Agree, and 7 = Strongly Agree). It is reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-60">
      Shukri, Jones, &amp; Conner (2017)
     </xref> to have a reliability coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) of 0.90 for WFC and 0.91 for FWC.</p>
    <p>Job Satisfaction was measured using an abbreviated 9-item version of the Index of Satisfaction, originally developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-15">
      Brayfield and Rothe (1951)
     </xref>. The items were measured on a seven (7) point Likert Scale ranging from 1 to 7 (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Slightly Disagree, 3 = disagree, 4 = neutral, 5 = agree, 6 = Slightly Agree, 7 = Strongly Agree). It has been reported to have a Cronbach’s alpha of .90 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-40">
      Lee et al., 2012
     </xref>). Sample items are “I consider my job pleasant” and “Most days, I am enthusiastic about my work”. However, by way of making the items more understandable to the respondents for the present study, the word “enthusiastic” in this item was changed to “excited”.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Life Satisfaction was also measured using a scale developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-22">
      Diener, Emmons, Larsen, and Griffin (1985)
     </xref>. The scale has 5-item measured on a seven (7) point Likert Scale ranging from 1 to 7 (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Slightly Disagree, 3 = disagree, 4 = neutral, 5 = agree, 6 = Slightly Agree, and 7 = Strongly Agree). Sample items are “So far I have gotten the important things I want in my life” and “In most ways, my life is close to ideal”. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-#HYPERLINK  l R30">
      Hofmann et al. (2014)
     </xref> as 0.87.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s4">
   <title>4. Data Analysis and Results</title>
   <p>Data were analysed through (SPSS) version 21. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Several inferential statistical analyses were conducted. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) were employed to test the hypotheses, and the regression confirmed the SEM results. Subsequently, A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to determine the goodness of fit of the total measurement model.</p>
   <sec id="s4_1">
    <title>4.1. Demographic Characteristics of Respondents</title>
    <p>Age, gender, number of children, marital status, position, qualifications, years of service with the current company, and type of job were among the demographics of the respondents. The results of the respondents’ demographic profiles are displayed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
      Table 1
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table1">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">
       Table 1
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 1. Profile of the research participants.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Detail</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">Frequency</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">Percent (%)</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Age</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">20 - 29</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">57</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">18.3</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">30 - 39</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">115</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">37.0</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">40 - 49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">82</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">26.4</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">50 - 59</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">49</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">15.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">60+</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">2.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Academic Qualification</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">SSSCE/WASSCE</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">116</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">37.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Diploma</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">45</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">14.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">First Degree</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">97</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">31</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Postgraduate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">31</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">10.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Professional</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">22</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">7.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Rank</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Subordinate</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">270</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">86.8</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Superior</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">41</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">13.2</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Years of Employment</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">1 - 5</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">58</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">18.6</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">6 - 10</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">78</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">25.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">11 - 15</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">65</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">20.9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">16 - 20</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">50</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">16.1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">21 - 25</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">9.65</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">26 - 30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">30</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">9.65</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Marital Status</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Single</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">126</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">40.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Married</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">185</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">59.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">Number of Children</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">None</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">56</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">18</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">One</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">73</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">23.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="39.07%"><p style="text-align:center">More than one</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.68%"><p style="text-align:center">182</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="30.25%"><p style="text-align:center">58.5</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Sample size (N) = 311 Source: Field Data, 2024.</p>
    <p>Of the total respondents, 311 (18.3%) were between the ages of 20 - 29 and the majority (37%) were 30 - 39 years. Of these, 26.4% and 15.8% were between the ages of 40 - 49 and 50 - 59 years respectively. However, only 2.6% of the participants were 60 years. In terms of academic qualifications, 37.2% had SSSCE/WASSCE, representing the majority, 14.5% had a diploma, 31% had first-degree holders, and 10.1% had a Postgraduate Degree. Only 22 (7.2%) respondents had professional certificates</p>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_2">
    <title>4.2. Measurement Issues</title>
    <p>Convergent validity was determined by an Average Value Extracted (AVE), in which a value of at least 0.5 indicated sufficient convergent validity. The average variance extracted (AVE) of all latent constructs was greater than the recommended cut-off point of 0.50 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-25">
      Fornell &amp; Larcker, 1981
     </xref>). This indicated adequate convergent validity, suggesting that the constructs which were supposed to be related were. Discriminant validity was also examined by ensuring that the AVE of each latent variable was greater than the squared correlations with all the other latent variables. This indicates that the constructs had sufficient discriminant validity. This also means that constructs which are not supposed to be related are unrelated as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
      Table 2
     </xref> below.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table2">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">
       Table 2
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 2. Validity and Reliability Analyses for (CFA) measurement model.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="21.44%"><p style="text-align:center">Cronbach’s</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.62%"><p style="text-align:center">CR</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="29.24%"><p style="text-align:center">AVE</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Work-Family Conflict</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="21.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.830</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.902</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="29.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.651</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Job Satisfaction</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.757</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.601</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.533</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.70%"><p style="text-align:center">Life Satisfaction</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="21.44%"><p style="text-align:center">0.750</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.62%"><p style="text-align:center">0.802</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="29.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.585</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Field Data, 2024.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>The Fornell and Larcker test was used to assess discriminant validity. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-25">
      Fornell and Larcker (1981)
     </xref>, the square root of AVE should exceed 0.5. When a concept has discriminant validity, it describes a distinct phenomenon that is not mirrored by another construct in the model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-29">
      Hair et al., 2017
     </xref>). Discriminant validity assesses how different one construct is from another. The results reported in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
      Table 3
     </xref> reveal that the control and latent variables in this study are unique from each other, since each recorded a value larger than 0.5.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table3">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">
       Table 3
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 3. Fornell-Larcker procedure for discriminant validity.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="38.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="24.34%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.24%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="17.94%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="38.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Work-Family Conflict</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="24.34%"><p style="text-align:center">0.521</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.24%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="17.94%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Job Satisfaction</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.34%"><p style="text-align:center">0.453</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.24%"><p style="text-align:center">0.807</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.94%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="38.48%"><p style="text-align:center">Life Satisfaction</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="24.34%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.239</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.24%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.080</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="17.94%"><p style="text-align:center">0.765</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Field Data, 2024.</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> shows that the factor loadings of all individual items, as presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
      Table 4
     </xref> below, were significant (p &lt; 0.01), and their factor loadings were above 0.5. with the exception of JS9 which is less than 0.5.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table4">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">
       Table 4
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 4. Factor loadings for (CFA) measurement model.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="35.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Variables</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">Indicators</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">Loading</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">T-value</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="5" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Work-Family Conflict</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">WFC1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.879***</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">8.231</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">WFC2</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.766***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">7.139</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">WFC3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.904***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">10.783</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">WFC4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.781***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">6.559</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">WFC5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.683</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="2" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Job Satisfaction</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">JS4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.589***</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">4.862</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">JS9</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.443</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td rowspan="3" class="custom-top-td acenter" width="35.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Life Satisfaction</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">LS2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.941***</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">8.070</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">LS3</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.741***</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center">4.331</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="28.83%"><p style="text-align:center">LS4</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="20.04%"><p style="text-align:center">0.566</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="15.22%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
      Table 5
     </xref> shows the correlation matrix representing the linear relationships between the variables under study. The results show a relationship between work-family conflict (WFC) and job satisfaction (JS). The results showed that work-family conflict (WFC) has a significant positive relationship (r = 0.273, p &lt; 0.01) with job satisfaction. On the other hand, life satisfaction (LS) showed a negative relationship with WFC (r = −0.089). In addition, demographic variables, such as age, academic qualification, number of years in service, and number of children, had significant and positive relationships with WFC (r = 0.015, p &lt; 0.01); (r = 0. 121, p &lt; 0.05), (r = 0. 126, p &lt; 0.05) and (r = 0. 203, p &lt; 0.01), respectively.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table5">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">
       Table 5
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 5. Pearson’s correlation matrix of the study’s variables.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">2</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">4</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">5</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">6</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center">7</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center">8</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center">9</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">1. JS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.104</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">2. LS</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.273**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">3. WFC</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.043</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.089</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">4. Age</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.058</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.022</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">0.0158**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">5. Qual</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.058</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.048</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">0.121*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">0.600**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">6. Rank</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.029</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.025</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">0.077</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">0.371**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.220**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">7. Years in Serv</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.027</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.012</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">0.126*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">0.798**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">540*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.277**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">8. Marital Status</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.023</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.029</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">0.064</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">0.492**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.224**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.218**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center">0.485</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center"></p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="aleft" width="18.22%"><p style="text-align:left">9. Num of Child</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.104</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.064</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.75%"><p style="text-align:center">0.203**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.07%"><p style="text-align:center">0.455**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.50%"><p style="text-align:center">0.300*</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.92%"><p style="text-align:center">0.111</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.76%"><p style="text-align:center">0.445**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="8.65%"><p style="text-align:center">360**</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="3.71%"><p style="text-align:center">1</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Field Data (2024). **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref> presents the goodness-of-fit of the constructs. The structural model was validated by using various fit indices. The cutoff criteria required by the model were met, signifying that the model fits the data. The model showed a sufficient fit, consistent with the thresholds recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-31">
      Hu and Bentler (1999)
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-28">
      Hair et al., 2010
     </xref>. The Chi-square for degrees of freedom CMIN/df for the study model was 1.621. This is within the threshold range of 1 - 3, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-31">
      Hu and Bentler (1999)
     </xref>. The Comparative Fit Index (CFI) was 0.985, which met the cutoff points recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-59">
      Schreiber et al. (2006)
     </xref>. The Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA) of the model for this study was 0.042 which is excellent according to the recommended cutoff point (&lt;0.06) suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-31">
      Hu and Bentler (1999)
     </xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-28">
      Hair et al., 2010
     </xref>. The Pclose (0.082), Standardised Root Mean Square of Residuals (SRMR) (0.056), goodness-of-fit index (GFI) (0.954), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) (0.954), Incremental Fit Index (IFI) (0.958), and Adjusted Goodness-of-fit (AGFI) (0.944) also met the cutoff points recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-31">
      Hu and Bentler (1999)
     </xref>. All these values, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
      Table 6
     </xref>, indicate that the hypothesised model fits the data.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table6">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">
       Table 6
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 6. Goodness-of-fit indices for a structural model.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">Measurement</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">Estimate</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Threshold</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Interpretation</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">CMIN/df</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">1.621</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">Between 1 and 3</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">C.F.I.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.985</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">≥0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">G.F.I.</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.954</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">≥0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">RMSEA</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.042</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.06</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">PClose</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.082</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;0.05</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">AGFI</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.944</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">≥ 0.90</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">SRMR</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.056</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">&lt;0.08</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">TLI</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.954</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Acceptable</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.47%"><p style="text-align:center">IFI</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="23.49%"><p style="text-align:center">0.958</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="27.13%"><p style="text-align:center">&gt;0.95</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="25.91%"><p style="text-align:center">Excellent</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
   </sec>
   <sec id="s4_3">
    <title>4.3. Test of Hypothesised Relationship</title>
    <p>
     <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref> shows the summary results of the test of hypothesis of the study. Based on the results of the hypothesis test, the value of R<sup>2</sup> = 0.050 suggests that work-family conflict explains 5% of the variance in job satisfaction among female prison officers. While this value indicates that a relationship exists, it also suggests that other factors may contribute to job satisfaction that are not accounted for in this model. The correlation coefficient (r = 0.273) indicates a small to moderate positive relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction. Since the p-value is 0.000 (less than 0.05), this correlation is statistically significant, which implies that as work-family conflict increases, job satisfaction also tends to increase. The beta value (β = 0.311) further supports the positive relationship indicated by the correlation. This suggests that a one-unit increase in work-family conflict is associated with a 0.311 increase in job satisfaction. A statistically significant p-value (0.000) indicated that this relationship was highly reliable. The hypothesis that work-family conflict negatively influences job satisfaction is not supported by the findings of this study. Despite the expectation that work-family conflict might negatively impact job satisfaction, the results suggest a statistically significant positive relationship.</p>
    <p>Furthermore, in line with hypothesis 2, which was the hypothesis that work-family conflict has a negative correlation with life satisfaction from the test result, the correlation coefficient (r = 0.089) suggests a very weak positive correlation between work-family conflict and life satisfaction. A p-value of 0.119 indicated that this correlation was not statistically significant. This implies that we do not have sufficient evidence to conclude that work-family conflict is meaningfully related to life satisfaction. However, (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.0123) (or approximately 1.23%) suggests that only about 1.23% of the variance in life satisfaction can be explained by work-family conflict in this model. This further supports the notion that work-family conflict has a minimal impact on life satisfaction. While the Beta Estimate (beta = −0.122) suggests a negative relationship if work-family conflict increases, life satisfaction is expected to decrease. However, the (p = 0.029) indicates that this relationship is statistically significant, suggesting that there is a meaningful association, even though the actual correlation showed a weak association. In conclusion, while the Pearson correlation indicates a weak and insignificant relationship between work and family conflict and life satisfaction, the beta estimate suggests a significant negative relationship. Therefore hypothesis two is supported as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
      Table 7
     </xref>.</p>
    <table-wrap id="table7">
     <label>
      <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">
       Table 7
      </xref></label>
     <caption>
      <title>
       <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-"></xref>Table 7. Summary of result/test of hypothesised relationship.</title>
     </caption>
     <table class="MsoTableGrid custom-table" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="33.84%"><p style="text-align:center">Path Model Relationship</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">Estimates</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="10.69%"><p style="text-align:center">S.E.</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="12.01%"><p style="text-align:center">CR</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="9.36%"><p style="text-align:center">P</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-bottom-td acenter" width="19.14%"><p style="text-align:center">Decision</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="33.84%"><p style="text-align:center">ZWFC----&gt;ZJS</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">0.311</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="10.69%"><p style="text-align:center">0.054</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="12.01%"><p style="text-align:center">5.767</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="9.36%"><p style="text-align:center">0.000</p></td> 
       <td class="custom-top-td acenter" width="19.14%"><p style="text-align:center">not supported</p></td> 
      </tr> 
      <tr> 
       <td class="acenter" width="33.84%"><p style="text-align:center">ZWFC----&gt;ZLS</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="14.95%"><p style="text-align:center">−0.122</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="10.69%"><p style="text-align:center">0.056</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="12.01%"><p style="text-align:center">−2.179</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="9.36%"><p style="text-align:center">0.029</p></td> 
       <td class="acenter" width="19.14%"><p style="text-align:center">supported</p></td> 
      </tr> 
     </table>
    </table-wrap>
    <p>Source: Field Data (2024). WFC = Work-Family Conflict; JS = Job Satisfaction; LS = Life Satisfaction; and Z = Z scores for the variables.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s5">
   <title>5. Discussion</title>
   <p>Drawing on spillover theory, we examined the effect of work-family conflict on the job and life satisfaction of female prison officers. This study was conducted in two regions of Ghana: The Greater Accra and the Eastern Region. This study uses spillover theory to explain the relationship between the study constructs. The study had two hypothesis states and, based on Hypothesis 1, H<sub>1</sub>: work-family conflict will negatively influence job satisfaction. The study proposed that work-family conflict would negatively influence job satisfaction, and the expectation was that the level of influence would be very significant. The results of the hypothesis test reveal an intriguing relationship between work-family conflict and job satisfaction among female prison officers. The R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.050 indicates that work-family conflict accounts for only 5% of the variance in job satisfaction, suggesting that there are likely other factors influencing job satisfaction that are not captured in this analysis. The correlation coefficient (r = 0.273) demonstrates a small to moderate positive relationship, indicating that as work-family conflict increases, job satisfaction also tends to increase. This finding is somewhat unexpected, as one might typically anticipate that work-family conflict would negatively affect job satisfaction. However, the statistically significant p-value of 0.000 confirms that the observed correlation is reliable and non-random. Moreover, the beta value (β = 0.311) indicates that for every one-unit increase in work-family conflict, job satisfaction increases by approximately 0.311 units. This result reinforces the idea of a positive relationship between the two variables. This finding is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-7">
     Aleksic et al. (2017)
    </xref>, who investigated the effect of work-family balance on job satisfaction and found a positive correlation. In addition, the findings are supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-56">
     Raza et al. (2018)
    </xref>, who also found a positive relationship between work-family balance and job satisfaction. Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-11">
     Asbari, Purwanto, Sudargini, and Fahmi (2020)
    </xref>, in their also revealed that work-family conflict has a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction.</p>
   <p>However, the findings are in contrast with the majority of work-family conflict studies which revealed a negative association between WFC and job satisfaction (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-14">
     Baral, 2016
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-21">
     Dartey-Baah, 2015
    </xref>). Likewise, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-5">
     Afzal and Farooqi (2014)
    </xref> found that WFC and FWC have significant negative relationships with job satisfaction. Job satisfaction was also found to be negatively related to work-family conflict (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-11">
     Asbari, Purwanto, Sudargini, &amp; Fahmi, 2020
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-9">
     Arıbaş &amp; Özşahin, 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-41">
     Li et al., 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-36">
     Khan, 2022
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-49">
     Nugroho et al., 2024
    </xref>). Further, based on the information provided, the R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.050 indicates that work-family conflict explains only 5% of the variance in job satisfaction, which is quite low. This suggests that work-family conflict is not a strong predictor of job satisfaction and that other factors may play a more significant role, such as contextual factors. Perhaps in this particular context, job demands lead to greater appreciation for both work and family roles, promoting job satisfaction despite conflicts. Another factor may be role enrichment; work-family conflict could lead to role enrichment, where challenges faced at work might provide a sense of achievement and enhance overall job satisfaction, especially if the job is viewed as critically important, and the work environment itself may foster job satisfaction despite conflicts, such as strong workplace relationships or a commitment to the values of the role.</p>
   <p>Another salient reason why work-family conflict has a significant positive relationship with job satisfaction may be the shift system run by the Ghana prison service. Officers get the opportunity to schedule family activities to fit into their off days at work. This confirms a comparative study conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-64">
     Stone, Kemp, Rix, and Weldon (1993)
    </xref>, who investigated the relationship between job satisfaction and the shift system in the police service of two different forces: Ottawa forces and regulation forces. The Ottawa forces started running the shift system, while regulatory forces were still using the traditional system. The results of this study indicate that Ottawa officers experienced a significant increase in their job satisfaction due to the introduction of the shift system. However, regulatory officers who were not running the shift system expressed a decrease in their satisfaction.</p>
   <p>In line with hypothesis H<sub>2</sub>, Work-family conflict will negatively influence life satisfaction. This study found a negative correlation between work-family conflict and life satisfaction. This result is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-5">
     Afzal and Farooqi (2014)
    </xref>, who investigated the impact of work-family conflict and family-work conflict on job satisfaction and life satisfaction and discovered that there is a negative relationship between life satisfaction and work-family conflict. Furthermore, the study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-74">
     Zhang, Rasheed, and Luqman (2020)
    </xref>, on work-family conflict and turnover intentions among Chinese nurses: The combined role of job and life satisfaction and perceived supervisor revealed a negative correlation between work-family conflict and life satisfaction. These findings support those of the current study. Their study revealed that when heavy work demands (i.e., high work overload and tough work schedules) interfere with the performance of the family role, nurses may be less satisfied, which in turn leads to nurses intending to quit their current jobs. In addition, other scholars have found a negative relationship between work-family conflict and life satisfaction such as (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-52">
     Qiu &amp; Fan, 2015
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-71">
     Yucel, 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-68">
     Wang &amp; Peng, 2017
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-12">
     Bai, Gopalan, Beutell, &amp; Ren, 2021
    </xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-41">
     Li et al., 2021
    </xref>). All these studies found a negative relationship between work-family conflict and life satisfaction. Therefore, in line with these studies, female prison officers experience a decrease in life satisfaction as work-family conflict increases. This suggests that one of the most crucial factors in the contented existence of female prison officials is their family’s contentment. Work-related issues likely impact a person’s emotional and psychological well-being, and while they may experience job satisfaction because of support from superiors or colleagues, their personal life satisfaction may not align with their job satisfaction. Future research could investigate whether factors such as age, rank, and marital status have differential impacts on female jail officials’ job and life satisfaction. Further research is needed to investigate other elements that may contribute to female prison officers’ job satisfaction as well as the complexities in the relationship highlighted by these findings.</p>
  </sec><sec id="s6">
   <title>6. Conclusion</title>
   <p>There has been much research on work-family conflict, much from Asia, the United States, and Europe, with relatively little research in sub-Saharan Africa. Empirical data from sub-Saharan Africa expand our knowledge of the research concept, since work-family conflict is significantly influenced by cultural dynamics. This study empirically examines the impact of work-family conflict on the life and job satisfaction of female Ghanaian prison officers. The theoretical and empirical literature on work-family conflict was enhanced in this study. In line with the investigated hypothesis, work-family conflict has a negative relationship with life satisfaction but a positive correlation with job satisfaction, which was confirmed by this study. The results of this study strongly suggest that senior officers and superiors in security agencies should strive to create a supportive work environment in which direct supervisors can assist juniors with work-family conflict issues. Second, training should be provided to all officers on improving copying and managerial techniques to cope with the negative impact of work-family conflict on their jobs and lives.</p>
   <sec id="s6_1">
    <title>Limitations and Direction for Future Research</title>
    <p>Despite its contributions, this study had few limitations. First, the study was conducted at two prison service command centres in Ghana. However, these results may vary across countries. Future research should involve significant regional command centres around the country to obtain more generalised conclusions. This study employed a cross-sectional research design using a self-reported closed-ended questionnaire. Therefore, it is possible that changes in employee behaviour over time go unnoticed. In addition, a respondent’s capacity to express their opinions is typically restricted when employing closed-ended questions. Consequently, future research should employ a longitudinal and mixed-method design to fully comprehend this subject. Furthermore, while the study used a sample size of 311, which is adequate for quantitative studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.141093-54">
      Rahi, 2017
     </xref>), it is therefore recommended that future studies use a larger sample size to improve the accuracy of the findings. Again, the study employed a convenience sampling technique, which meant that only respondents who were within station centres and could be easily reached were included in the sample. Thus, future studies should use a stratified random sampling technique to provide proportionate representation of each regional command to achieve more generalised results. Finally, as this study included only female prison officers, future studies should consider including male officers to provide more balanced results. Future studies should thus attempt to investigate the relationships among job satisfaction, family satisfaction, life satisfaction, and work-family and family-work conflicts within other security agencies. Despite these limitations, this study made a significant contribution to the work-family conflict literature in the sub-Saharan context, specifically Ghana. The findings of this study showed that WFC is positively related to job satisfaction, adding up to other scholars who have found a positive significant relationship, in contrast to the majority of authors who have found a negative relationship.</p>
   </sec>
  </sec><sec id="s7">
   <title>NOTES</title>
   <p>*Leading author.</p>
   <p><sup>#</sup>Corresponding author.</p>
  </sec>
 </body><back>
  <ref-list>
   <title>References</title>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref1">
    <label>1</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Abugre, J. B. (2014). Job Satisfaction of Public Sector Employees in Sub-Saharan Africa: Testing the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire in Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 655-665. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903268
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref2">
    <label>2</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Achour, M., Grine, F.,&amp;Roslan Mohd Nor, M. (2014). Work-Family Conflict and Coping Strategies: Qualitative Study of Muslim Female Academicians in Malaysia. Mental Health, Religion&amp;Culture, 17, 1002-1014. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2014.994201
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref3">
    <label>3</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ádám, S., Györffy, Z.,&amp;Susánszky, É. (2008). Physician Burnout in Hungary: A Potential Role for Work Family Conflict. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 847-856. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308095055
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref4">
    <label>4</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Afaq, A.,&amp;Arshad, A. (2022). Examining the Echelon of Job Satisfaction among Male and Female Academic Staff. Advances in Learning and Educational Studies, 1, 28-34.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref5">
    <label>5</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Afzal, S.,&amp;Farooqi, Y. A. (2014). Impact of Work Family Conflict/Family Work Conflict on Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction: A Case Study of a Public Sector University, Gujranwala Division, Pakistan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 5, 31-36.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref6">
    <label>6</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Akram, B., Bibi, B., Ashfaq Ahmed, M.,&amp;Kausar, N. (2022). Work-Family Conflict and Suicidal Ideation among Physicians of Pakistan: The Moderating Role of Perceived Life Satisfaction. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 85, 465-482. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222820947246
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref7">
    <label>7</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aleksic, D., Mihelič, K. K., Černe, M.,&amp;Škerlavaj, M. (2017). Interactive Effects of Perceived Time Pressure, Satisfaction with Work-Family Balance (SWFB), and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) on Creativity. Personnel Review, 46, 662-679. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-04-2015-0085
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref8">
    <label>8</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Almutairi, D, O. (2017). Work-Family Conflict, Social Support and Job Satisfaction among Saudi Female Teachers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29, 287-298. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33948/1158-029-002-005
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref9">
    <label>9</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aribaş, A. N.,&amp;Özşahin, F. (2021). A Research on the Effect of Work-Family Conflict on Life Satisfaction and Job Satisfaction. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4, 294-308. &gt;https://doi.org/10.33416/baybem.915194
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref10">
    <label>10</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Aryee, S., Fields, D.,&amp;Luk, V. (1999). A Cross-Cultural Test of a Model of the Work-Family Interface. Journal of Management, 25, 491-511. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500402
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref11">
    <label>11</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Sudargini, Y.,&amp;Fahmi, K. (2020). The Effect of Work-Family Conflict and Social Support on Job Satisfaction: A Case Study of Female Employees in Indonesia. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 1, 32-42.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref12">
    <label>12</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Bai, B., Gopalan, N., Beutell, N.,&amp;Ren, F. (2021). Impact of Absolute and Relative Commute Time on Work-Family Conflict: Work Schedule Control, Child Care Hours, and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 42, 586-600. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-021-09752-w
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref13">
    <label>13</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baluyos, G. R., Rivera, H. L.,&amp;Baluyos, E. L. (2019). Teachers’ Job Satisfaction and Work Performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 206-221. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.78015
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref14">
    <label>14</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Baral, R. (2016). Women Managers&amp;Professionals: Work-Family Conflict&amp;Job Satisfaction. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 51, 320-337.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref15">
    <label>15</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Brayfield, A. H.,&amp;Rothe, H. F. (1951). An Index of Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref16">
    <label>16</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cha, H. S.,&amp;Lee, J. P. (2024). The Impact of Work-Family Conflict on Depression among Korean Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Moderated Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction. International Journal of Women’s Health, 16, 923-936. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s463794
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref17">
    <label>17</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Chordiya, R., Sabharwal, M.,&amp;Battaglio, R. P. (2019). Dispositional and Organizational Sources of Job Satisfaction: A Cross-National Study. Public Management Review, 21, 1101-1124. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1544274
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref18">
    <label>18</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley&amp;Sons.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref19">
    <label>19</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cribb, R. (2000). From Petrus to Ninja: Death Squads in Indonesia. In B. B. Campbell,&amp;A. D. Brenner (Eds.), Death Squads in Global Perspective (pp. 181-202). Palgrave Macmillan US. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230108141_7
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref20">
    <label>20</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Cromartie, C. (2020). Barriers African American Women Law Enforcement Officers Face in Career Advancement. Doctoral Dissertation, St. Thomas University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref21">
    <label>21</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dartey-Baah, K. (2015). Work-Family Conflict, Demographic Characteristics and Job Satisfaction among Ghanaian Corporate Leaders. International Journal of Business, 20, 291-307.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref22">
    <label>22</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J.,&amp;Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref23">
    <label>23</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Dorenkamp, I.,&amp;Ruhle, S. (2019). Work-Life Conflict, Professional Commitment, and Job Satisfaction among Academics. The Journal of Higher Education, 90, 56-84. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2018.1484644
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref24">
    <label>24</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Eliyana, A.,&amp;Pradana, I. I. (2020). The Effect of Work-Family Conflict on Job Satisfaction with Organisational Commitment as the Moderator Variable. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11, 429-437.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref25">
    <label>25</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Fornell, C.,&amp;Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref26">
    <label>26</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Gabini, S.,&amp;Salessi, S. (2019). Work-Family Interfase and Job Performance: Job Satisfaction as Mediator. Journal of Psychological Research, 1, 36-44. &gt;https://doi.org/10.30564/jpr.v1i2.624
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref27">
    <label>27</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Grandey, A. A., Cordeiro, B. L.,&amp;Crouter, A. C. (2018). A Longitudinal and Multi-Source Test of the Work-Family Conflict and Job Satisfaction Relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 91, 498-517.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref28">
    <label>28</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Balin, B. J.,&amp;Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate and Data Analysis. Maxwell Macmillan.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref29">
    <label>29</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M.,&amp;Thiele, K. O. (2017). Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: A Comparative Evaluation of Composite-Based Structural Equation Modeling Methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 616-632. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0517-x
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref30">
    <label>30</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hofmann, W., Luhmann, M., Fisher, R. R., Vohs, K. D.,&amp;Baumeister, R. F. (2014). Yes, but Are They Happy? Effects of Trait Self-Control on Affective Well-Being and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 82, 265-277. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12050
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref31">
    <label>31</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Hu, L.,&amp;Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref32">
    <label>32</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kalliath, P., Kalliath, T.,&amp;Chan, C. (2017). Work-Family Conflict, Family Satisfaction and Employee Well-Being: A Comparative Study of Australian and Indian Social Workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 27, 366-381. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12143
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref33">
    <label>33</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Karatepe, O. M.,&amp;Baddar, L. (2006). An Empirical Study of the Selected Consequences of Frontline Employees’ Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict. Tourism Management, 27, 1017-1028. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.10.024
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref34">
    <label>34</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Karatepe, O. M., Kilic, H.,&amp;Isiksel, B. (2008). An Examination of the Selected Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict in Frontline Service Jobs. Services Marketing Quarterly, 29, 1-24. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/15332960802218620
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref35">
    <label>35</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ke, J., Zhou, J.,&amp;Zhu, W. (2019). The Impact of Police Work-Family Conflict on Turnover Intentions: The Roles of Organizational Support and Job Burnout. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 1-12. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.74001
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref36">
    <label>36</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Khan, R. B. F. (2022). Mediation Role of Work Flexibility on the Linking of Work Family Conflict and Job Satisfaction. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen, 9, 87-93. &gt;https://doi.org/10.26905/jbm.v9i1.7627
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref37">
    <label>37</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Kim, H.,&amp;Lee, S. W. (2017). Dual Family Working Mothers’ Childcare Obligation, the Role of Husband, and Its Effects on Positive Work-Family Transfer and Depression. The Journal of Social Science, 24, 83-106. &gt;https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2017.12.24.4.83
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref38">
    <label>38</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lambert, E. G., Qureshi, H., Frank, J., Keena, L. D.,&amp;Hogan, N. L. (2017). The Relationship of Work-Family Conflict with Job Stress among Indian Police Officers: A Research Note. Police Practice and Research, 18, 37-48. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2016.1210010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref39">
    <label>39</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lazazzara, A., Tims, M.,&amp;de Bloom, J. (2021). Challenge versus Hindrance Work Stress and Well-Being: A Daily Diary Study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26, 55-69.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref40">
    <label>40</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lee, Y., Kim, Y., Lee, K. H.,&amp;Li, D. (2012). The Impact of CSR on Relationship Quality and Relationship Outcomes: A Perspective of Service Employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31, 745-756. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.011
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref41">
    <label>41</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Li, X., Lin, X., Zhang, F.,&amp;Tian, Y. (2021). Playing Roles in Work and Family: Effects of Work/Family Conflicts on Job and Life Satisfaction among Junior High School Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 772025. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.772025
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref42">
    <label>42</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Lippman, L. H., Moore, K. A.,&amp;McIntosh, H. (2011). Positive Indicators of Child Well-Being: A Conceptual Framework, Measures, and Methodological Issues. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6, 425-449. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9138-6
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref43">
    <label>43</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Matthews, R. A., Kath, L. M.,&amp;Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2010). A Short, Valid, Predictive Measure of Work-Family Conflict: Item Selection and Scale Validation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, 75-90. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017443
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref44">
    <label>44</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     McDowell, W. C., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., Aaron, J. R., Edmondson, D. R.,&amp;Ward, C. B. (2019). The Price of Success: Balancing the Effects of Entrepreneurial Commitment, Work-Family Conflict and Emotional Exhaustion on Job Satisfaction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 1179-1192. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00581-w
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref45">
    <label>45</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Michel, J. S., Clark, M. A.,&amp;Jaramillo, D. (2011). The Role of the Five Factor Model of Personality in the Perceptions of Negative and Positive Forms of Work-Nonwork Spillover: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 191-203. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref46">
    <label>46</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Miller, R. L.,&amp;Brewer, J. D. (2003). The AZ of Social Research: A Dictionary of Key Social Science Research Concepts. Sage.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref47">
    <label>47</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Moen, P., Kelly, E. L.,&amp;Huang, Q. (2018). Work, Family and Life-Course Fit: Does Control over Work Time Matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 14-24.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref48">
    <label>48</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S.,&amp;McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and Validation of Work-Family Conflict and Family-Work Conflict Scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400-410. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref49">
    <label>49</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Nugroho, A., Soepatini, S., Wujoso, H.,&amp;Waskito, J. (2024). The Effect of Work-Family Conflict and Job Stress on Performance with Job Satisfaction as a Mediation Variable. International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 4, 47-55. &gt;https://doi.org/10.35870/ijmsit.v4i1.2102
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref50">
    <label>50</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Oliver, R. L. (2014). Satisfaction: A Behavioural Perspective on the Consumer. Routledge.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref51">
    <label>51</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Onyemah, V., Rouziès, D.,&amp;Iacobucci, D. (2018). Impact of Religiosity and Culture on Salesperson Job Satisfaction and Performance. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 18, 191-219. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595818787543
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref52">
    <label>52</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qiu, L.,&amp;Fan, J. (2015). Family Boundary Characteristics, Work-Family Conflict and Life Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Model. International Journal of Psychology, 50, 336-344. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12107
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref53">
    <label>53</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Qureshi, H., Lambert, E. G.,&amp;Frank, J. (2019). When Domains Spill Over: The Relationships of Work-Family Conflict with Indian Police Affective and Continuance Commitment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63, 2501-2525. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x19846347
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref54">
    <label>54</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rahi, S. (2017). Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development. International Journal of Economics&amp;Management Sciences, 6, Article ID: 1000403. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref55">
    <label>55</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Ratnaningrum, R., Rahmadani, W. S., Kusumajaya, R. A., Zusrony, E.,&amp;Hidayat, E. N. (2024). The Correlation Analysis of Islamic Work Ethic, Islamic Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Employee Performance. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 7, 23-33. &gt;https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2024.2.03
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref56">
    <label>56</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Raza, B., Ali, M., Naseem, K., Moeed, A., Ahmed, J.,&amp;Hamid, M. (2018). Impact of Trait Mindfulness on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions: Mediating Role of Work-Family Balance and Moderating Role of Work-Family Conflict. Cogent Business&amp;Management, 5, Article ID: 1542943. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1542943
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref57">
    <label>57</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Redick, J. (2024). The Factors That Influence and Nurture Women Law Enforcement Officers to Promote into Leadership Roles within Law Enforcement. Doctoral Dissertation, California Baptist University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref58">
    <label>58</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Rhee, M., Park, S. K.,&amp;Lee, C. (2020). Pathways from Workplace Flexibility to Turnover Intention: Role of Work-Family Conflict, Family-Work Conflict, and Job Satisfaction: Workplace Flexibility to Turnover Intention. International Journal of Social Welfare, 29, 51-61. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12382
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref59">
    <label>59</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A.,&amp;King, J. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323-338. &gt;https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref60">
    <label>60</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Shukri, M., Jones, F.,&amp;Conner, M. (2017). Relationship between Work-Family Conflict and Unhealthy Eating: Does Eating Style Matter? Appetite, 123, 225-232. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.027
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref61">
    <label>61</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Šimunić, A.,&amp;Gregov, L. (2012). Conflict between Work and Family Roles and Satisfaction among Nurses in Different Shift Systems in Croatia: A Questionnaire Survey. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 63, 189-197. &gt;https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-63-2012-2159
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref62">
    <label>62</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Siswanto, S., Masyhuri, M., Hidayati, N., Ridwan, M.,&amp;Hanif, R. (2022). Impact of Work-Family Conflict on Job Satisfaction and Job Stress: Mediation Model from Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20, 44-56. &gt;https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.05
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref63">
    <label>63</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Sousa, C., Viseu, J., Vincent, P., Vinagre, H., Romana, F. A., Pissarra, J. et al. (2023). Moderating Effect of Work-Family Conflict on the Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Job and Life Satisfaction: A Study during the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 13, 1175-1193. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2023.1311065
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref64">
    <label>64</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Stone, R., Kemp, T., Rix, B.,&amp;Weldon, G. (1993). Effective Shift System for the Police Service. Police Research Group, 2, 4-20.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref65">
    <label>65</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Tims, T. (2024). The Challenges in Reaching a Leadership Position for Females in Law Enforcement. Doctoral Dissertation, Capella University.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref66">
    <label>66</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Voydanoff, P. (2017). The Effects of Work Demands and Resources on Work-to-Family Conflict and Facilitation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 1008-1025.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref67">
    <label>67</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Y. (2024). Work-family Conflict and Balance Strategies—An Analysis Based on the Work-Family Resources Model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12, 1228-1239. &gt;https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.122064
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref68">
    <label>68</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Wang, Y.,&amp;Peng, J. (2017). Work-Family Conflict and Depression in Chinese Professional Women: The Mediating Roles of Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15, 394-406. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9736-0
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref69">
    <label>69</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yanchus, N. J.,&amp;Eby, L. T. (2022). Work-Family Conflict and Life Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 133, Article ID: 103750.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref70">
    <label>70</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yıldırım, M.,&amp;Acar, A. (2018). Influence of the Work-Family Conflict on Organisational Cynicism and Intermediary Role of the Life Satisfaction. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 13, 267-280.
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref71">
    <label>71</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yucel, D. (2017). Work-to-Family Conflict and Life Satisfaction: The Moderating Role of Type of Employment. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12, 577-591. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9477-4
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref72">
    <label>72</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Yucel, D.,&amp;Minnotte, K. L. (2017). Workplace Support and Life Satisfaction: The Mediating Roles of Work-to-Family Conflict and Mental Health. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12, 549-575. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9476-5
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref73">
    <label>73</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, J., Liu, Y.,&amp;Liu, Y. (2011). Antecedents of Work-Family Conflict: Review and Prospect. International Journal of Business and Management, 6, 89-104. &gt;https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n1p89
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref74">
    <label>74</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhang, Y., Rasheed, M. I.,&amp;Luqman, A. (2020). Work-Family Conflict and Turnover Intentions among Chinese Nurses: The Combined Role of Job and Life Satisfaction and Perceived Supervisor Support. Personnel Review, 49, 1140-1156. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-01-2019-0017
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
   <ref id="scirp.141093-ref75">
    <label>75</label>
    <mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">
     Zhao, X., Qu, H.,&amp;Ghiselli, R. (2011). Examining the Relationship of Work-Family Conflict to Job and Life Satisfaction: A Case of Hotel Sales Managers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 46-54. &gt;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.04.010
    </mixed-citation>
   </ref>
  </ref-list>
 </back>
</article>