<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ODEM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2333-3561</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/odem.2023.114012</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ODEM-127900</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Epidemiological Profile of Stress among Health Professionals in Northern Benin in 2021
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gounongbé</surname><given-names>A. Christophe Fabien</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mama</surname><given-names>Cissé Ibrahim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bèhanzin</surname><given-names>Luc</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Azandjèmè</surname><given-names>Colette Sylvie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Owona</surname><given-names>Manga Jules</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Regional Institute of Public Health of Ouidah, University of Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>National School for Training of Senior Technicians in Public Health and Surveillance Epidemiology, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>157</fpage><lpage>166</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25,</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: To study the epidemiological profile of stress among health professionals in North Benin in 2021. Methods: It was a cross-sectional and descriptive study with health professionals in the Parakou-N’dali and Tchaourou health zones. These two areas have a population of 462,942 inhabitants served by two university hospitals, three area hospitals and 19 health centers. Sampling was exhaustive by free and informed consent. The data was collected through a questionnaire. Studied socio-professional characteristics and stress. The level of stress was assessed using the Karasek questionnaire. Results: Of 813 caregivers approached, 692 were investigated. The participation rate was 85.1%. The average age was 38 years old. Subjects aged 28 - 38 were more numerous, as were those aged between 1 and 10 years. The prevalence of stress was 73.8%. Its level was high at 17.8% and very high at 4.5%. Women were affected (76.6%) than men (70.7%). Within the professional category, midwives were the most affected (82.5%). Respondents from the denominational sector were 90.8% reached. Conclusion: Professional stress is endemic in health facilities in northern Benin, particularly faith-based ones. Action must be taken to reduce it.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Occupational Stress</kwd><kwd> Health Training</kwd><kwd> Parakou-Ndali Zone</kwd><kwd> Tchaourou</kwd><kwd> Benin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Stress is the body’s reaction to a real or perceived threat. It is present in any professional activity. Occupational stress is particularly observed in work situations where social support is lacking, the objectives are not well defined as well as the role of the worker. Stress can have significant repercussions on health because it leads to a whole series of physical, emotional and behavioral disorders, as well as significant repercussions on performance.</p><p>The 2006 World Health Organization report on health [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref1">1</xref>] noted that in many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, the situation of stress in healthcare facilities was critical. A study carried out in 2013 at the Lagune Mother and Child Hospital in Cotonou concluded that the stress factors for caregivers were diverse and numerous [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref2">2</xref>] . Based on this basis, we wanted to know the situation of stress at work in health establishments in northern Benin. To this end, we have carried out work with the objective of studying the epidemiological profile of occupational stress among health personnel in northern Benin in 2021.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><p>It was a cross-sectional and descriptive study that lasted three months from August 1 to October 30, 2021. Data collection occurred from September 5 to 30, 2021. It involved health professionals practicing in training public, denominational and private sanitary facilities in the health zone of Parakou-Ndali and that of Tchaourou. These are two of the four health zones in the department of Borgou. These two areas have a population of 462,942 inhabitants served by two university hospitals, three area hospitals and 19 health centers (infirmary and maternity ward).</p><p>The sampling is an exhaustive census of healthcare personnel (doctors, nurses, midwives, laboratory technicians, and nursing assistants) working in these two health zones. All those who were present at their workstation during the data collection period and had their free and informed consent were included. An individual questionnaire was drawn up by the team and then tested in a health zone close to the study area. Corrected, it allowed us to collect the data. It contains 89 items with open and closed questions. The variables studied were socio-demographic characteristics (gender, age, professional category, seniority in the profession, health unit to which they belong, department) and stress (presence, level, frequency, symptoms).</p><p>Stress was assessed based on the Karasek questionnaire based on 21 items. When the answer to a question is “not at all” we give zero, “rarely” we give one, and “often” we give two. The sum of the scores led to retaining the following four levels of stress:</p><p>- low level: when the score is ≤ 7;</p><p>- average level: if 8 ≤ score ≤ 15;</p><p>- high level: when the score is ≥ 16.</p><p>The data collected was processed and analyzed with Epi info 7.2.0.1 software.</p><p>The agreement of the local ethics committee for biomedical research of the University of Parakou (appendix) was obtained under the number REP: 0262/CLERB-UP/P/SP/R/SA.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics</title><p>Of the 813 caregivers approached, 692 were surveyed, i.e., 85.1% participation rate. Those of the female sex were 395 (57.5%) to 297 (42.9%) of the male sex, hence a sex ratio (M/F) equal to 0.7. Their average age was 38. Subjects in the 28 - 38 age group made up 36.6% of the sample and those with a seniority of between 1 and 10 years made up 46.7%. Among them, 62.9% worked in public health facilities. Those who worked in the gynecology and obstetrics departments represented 23.1% and the nursing staff 32.7% of the respondents. The rest of the socio-demographic characteristics are recorded in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Prevalence of Stress</title><p>There were 511 (73.8%) respondents including 301 women (43.5%) who said they were stressed at work. The level of stress was high in 154 (22.3%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). Among women, 76.6% were affected against 70.7% of men. Within corporations, 82.5% of midwives had stress (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Stress was found in 90.8% of health professionals in denominational health facilities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><p>The stress link was statistically significant with the subjects’ sex (p = 0.0356), age (p = 0.043), professional category (p = 0.0102) and the sector to which they belonged (0.037) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). In any professional category, at least two out of three caregivers worked under stress apart from physiotherapists. It is noted that the link of this occupational pathology with seniority and hospital service is not statistically significant (p = 0.450). Of the 14 hospital departments listed, 10 subject two out of three of their workers to occupational stress (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The objective of the study was to know the epidemiology of occupational stress among caregivers in the health zones of Parakou-Ndali and Tchaourou in 2021. Cross-sectional and descriptive with prospective data collection, the study led to valid results for the sample.</p><p>Workplace stress was a concern for healthcare workers in both health zones. The rate of 85.1% of respondents is evocative. The study by Gounongb&#233; et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref3">3</xref>] on stress, carried out in the Parakou-Ndali health zone alone in 2013, had already seen a similar participation rate (82.2%) of health workers. In Morocco in 2005, Djeriri et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref4">4</xref>] reported a lower rate (67.8%) of caregivers for this same condition. It goes without saying that occupational stress is indeed a major concern for health professionals.</p><p>The female sex was predominant in the sample (sex ratio = 0.7). Gounongb&#233; and collaborators found this female preponderance among health professionals in the Parakou-Ndali health zone in 2013 (sex ratio = 0.6) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref3">3</xref>] . The same observation was made at the National Hospital of Niamey (Gounongb&#233; et al., 2021) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref5">5</xref>] with a higher rate of women (sex ratio = 11.4). In other studies,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents according to socio-professional characteristics, Parakou-Ndali health zone and Tchaourou zone, 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Socio-professional characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >˂28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[28 - 38[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >253</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[38 - 48[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[48 – 58]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >˃58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seniority (years)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[1 - 10]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >]10 - 20]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >257</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Qualification</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General practitioner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consultant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >226</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caregiver</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biology lab technician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >radiology technician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physiotherapist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sector of belonging</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Audience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >438</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Private</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Confessional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of respondents by service, Parakou-Ndali and Tchaourou health zone, 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Service</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gynecology and obstetrics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biology laboratory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pediatrics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physiotherapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anesthesia-resuscitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dermatology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ophthalmology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radiology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency room</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Otorhinolaryngology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomatology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psychiatry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Distribution of health workers according to level of stress, Parakou-Ndali and Tchaourou health zones, 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Level of stress</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caregiver not under stress</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >caregiver under stress (511)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Low level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High level</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >692</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation of stress with gender, age, seniority and professional category of respondents, Parakou-Ndali and Tchaourou health zones, 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Characteristics</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Stress</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percentage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0356</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >295</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >210</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Feminine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >397</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[28 - 38 years[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >251</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >194</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[38 - 48 years old[</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[48 - 58 years old]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;58 years old</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Seniority</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.450</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 year</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >[1 - 10 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >316</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >]10 - 20 years]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >240</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >188</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 years</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Professional category</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0102</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >General practitioner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Consultant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male nurse</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >172</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Midwife</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caregivers</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biology lab technician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >radiology technician</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physiotherapist</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation of stress with the sector to which caregivers belong and the exercise service, Parakou-N’dali and Tchaourou health zones, 2021</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Sector and activity area</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Stress</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Percentage</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sector</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.037</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Audience</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >68.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Private</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >144</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >81.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Confessional</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >90.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Service</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.098</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Obstetric gynecology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >159</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >82.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Medicine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >43.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Laboratory</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >58.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pediatrics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >83.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physiotherapy</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >84.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surgery</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >71.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anesthesia-Resuscitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >76.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dermatology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >36.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ophthalmology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >76.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Radiology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >75.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Emergency room</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >70.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ENT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >25.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Stomatology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >75.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Psychiatry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >66.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>notably in Morocco (sex-ratio = 0.8) (Laraqui et al., 2002) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref6">6</xref>] , in Tunisia (El Ghoul et al., 2017) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref7">7</xref>] (sex-ratio = 0.7) and in France (Pocheron, 2007) (sex-ratio = 0.8) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref8">8</xref>] , the female predominance is also noted. In S&#227;o Paulo, Brazil, Cavagioni et al. in 2011 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref9">9</xref>] also noted a strong female presence (sex-ratio = 0.7) among prehospital care professionals. There is indeed a feminization of the health profession [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The average age of our respondents was 38 years old. It is similar to that (37.9 &#177; 10.7 years) of health workers from Lom&#233; in Togo (Bagny et al., 2010) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref10">10</xref>] . But it is below that (45.65 &#177; 8.9 years) found in Morocco in 2011 (Korrida et al.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref11">11</xref>] . However, none of our respondents was under the age of 18 in accordance with the recommendations of the ILO on the minimum age for admission to employment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>At 36.6%, subjects aged 28 to 38 were the most numerous in the sample. In the quest for the health consequences of night work among nursing staff in Niamey (2021), Gounongb&#233; and collaborators noted that those aged 30 - 39 (40.80%) were the most represented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref5">5</xref>] . So, there is a similarity between the two age groups.</p><p>They were 45.66% to have 1 year to 10 years of seniority in the profession. This is the most represented seniority. At the Niamey National Hospital in 2021, those with 8 to 15 years of seniority (49.2%) came first [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref5">5</xref>] . At the hospital of the University of Medical Sciences of Kerman in Iran, the shift staff dominated in terms of seniority those who were 5 to 10 years old (34.4%) (Zare et al., 2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Respondents from public health facilities were in the majority (62.92%) in the sample. This would be due to their high representativeness in the sample. The Beninese labor code has fixed the weekly working time at 40 hours, regardless of sex and mode of remuneration. However, 70.2% of our respondents worked beyond 40 hours. While three out of five respondents are employed by state. So, there is extra work.</p><p>Three out of four of our respondents (73.8%) were stressed. In Morocco (Laraqui et al., 2008), Tunisia (Halouani et al., 2018) and France (Weibel et al., 2004) health professionals were also stressed, but at lower rates, respectively 21.7%.; 40.7% and 46% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref15">15</xref>] . Female staff were more affected (75.8%). The same observation was made in Morocco (Laraqui et al. 2008) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref6">6</xref>] but to a lesser extent (59.1%). Paramedics were also more affected, in this case, midwives (82.50%), nurses (76.44%), and caregivers (76.28%). According to Laraqui and collaborators in Morocco in 2008 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref6">6</xref>] and Mrizak and collaborators [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref16">16</xref>] in Tunisia (2004), paramedical staff were more affected by stress, particularly caregivers and nurses. In Tunisia, doctors were the most stressed (Halouani et al., 2018) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Stress was statistically related to sex (p = 0.0356) and to age in North Benin (p = 0.043). In Tunisian series (Halouani et al., 2018; Bouattour et al., 2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref17">17</xref>] , stress was only associated with age. This was the case in Morocco in 2008 (p = 0.016), according to the study by Laraqui et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref6">6</xref>] . This correlation was not obtained in Nigeria (Olayinka et al., 2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref18">18</xref>] and in France (Tripodi et al., 2007) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref19">19</xref>] . It is significantly related to the sector to which the health facility belongs (p = 0.037). Its highest prevalence is recorded in faith-based health facilities (90.8%). We expected to have a lower rate in religious circles because of the tolerance that religion advocates. Authors explained the presence of stress in elderly subjects by the fear of the end of their careers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.127900-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>These two health zones are full of more caregivers in the department, they can therefore be extrapolated to the entire department. However, the declarative nature of the survey constitutes a limitation.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Occupational stress is endemic in health facilities in northern Benin, particularly faith-based ones. The prevalence is high in 2021. All categories of health professions are affected, in this case paramedics. Preventive measures are necessary to be taken by the health authorities in order to promote the health of health professionals. This involves solving problems with an ecosystem approach.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Fabien, G.A.C., Ibrahim, M.C., Luc, B., Sylvie, A.C. and Jules, O.M. (2023) Epidemiological Profile of Stress among Health Professionals in Northern Benin in 2021. Occupational Diseases and Environmental Medicine, 11, 157-166. https://doi.org/10.4236/odem.2023.114012</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Annex</title><p>Questionnaire</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.127900-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Personnels de santé. Genève. https://www.who.int/fr/health-topics/health-workforce</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gounongbé, A.C.F., Ayélo, A.P., Aguèmon, B., Djidonou, A., Gahou, T.L., Tognon, T.F., Gandaho, P. and Fayomi, B. (2013) évaluation des facteurs de stress chez les soignants de l’h&amp;#244;pital de la mère et de l’enfant de Cotonou, Bénin. Le Bénin Médical, 53, 28-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gounongbé, F., Ayélo, A., Aguèmon, B., Chouti, F, Zannou, M. and Fayomi, B. (2013) Facteurs de risques des accidents d’exposition au sang chez les professionnels de la santé de la zone sanitaire Parakou-N’dali (Nord-Bénin). RAMReS Sciences de la Santé, 1, 11-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Djeriri, K., Charof R., Laurichesse, H., Fontana, L., El Aouad, R., Merle, J.L., Catilina, P., Beytout, J. and Chamoux, A. (2005) Comportement et conditions de travail exposant au sang: Analyse des pratiques dans trois établissements de soins au Maroc. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 35, 396-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2005.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gounongbé, A.C.F., Ibrahim Amadou, S., Mikponhoué, R., Mama Cissé, I., Hinson, A.V. and Ayélo, A.P. (2020) Conséquences sanitaires du travail de nuit chez le personnel infirmier de l’h&amp;#244;pital national de Niamey en 2020. Cahiers du CBRSI, 19, 77-86.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laraqui, O., Laraqui, S., Tripodi, D., Caubet, A., Verger, C. and Laraqui, C.H. (2008) évaluation du stress chez le personnel de santé au Maroc: A propos d’une étude multicentrique. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l’Environnement, 69, 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admp.2008.06.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El Ghoul, J., Fki, W., Berrhouma, C., Khmakhem, R., Sanaii, S. and Ayadi, H. (2019) Habitudes tabagiques chez les personnels de santé dans un h&amp;#244;pital régional tunisien. Revue des Maladies Respiratoires, 36, A186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2018.10.411</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pocheron, M.H. (2007) Prévention des accidents avec exposition au sang et liquides biologiques. Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses, 37, S71-S73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-077X(07)80028-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavagioni, L. and Pierin, A.M. (2012) Risco cardiovascular em profissionais de saúde de servi&amp;#231;os de atendimento pré-hospitalar [Cardiovascular Risk among Health Professionals Working in Pre-Hospital Care Services]. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 46, 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342012000200018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bagny, A., Bouglouga, O., Djibril, M., Lawson, A., Laconi Kaaga, Y., Hamza Sama, D., Balaka, A. and Redah, D. (2013) Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Relative to the Risk of Transmission of Hepatitis B and C Viruses in a Hospital in Togo. Médecine et Santé Tropicales, 23, 300-303. https://doi.org/10.1684/mst.2013.0227</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Korrida, A., Bnin, M., Achablou, N. and Assahal, R. (2021) évaluation du risque cardiovasculaire chez les sujets asymptomatiques résidents au Sud du Maroc. Medecine des Maladies Metaboliques, 15, 709-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mmm.2021.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Organisation Internationale du Travail. Convention N°138 sur l’age minimum d’admission à l’emploi. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/fr/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ilo_code:C138</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zare, S., Shirvan, H.E., Hemmatjo, R., Faridan, M., Hajghani, M. and Dehaghi, B.F. (2018) Using the Analytic Network Process Method for Prioritizing and Weighing Shift Work Disorders among the Personnel of Hospitals of Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Circadian Rhythms, 16, 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jcr.163</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Halouani, N., Turki, M., Ennaoui, R., Aloulou, J. and Amami, O. (2018) La détresse psychologique du personnel médical et paramédical d’anesthésie-réanimation. The Pan African Medical Journal, 29, Article 221. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.221.12189</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weibel, L., Pittet, A., Gabrion, I., Kreutz, G. and Aussedat, M. (2004) évaluation du stress des médecins urgentistes lors des interventions pré hospitalières. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l’Environnement, 65, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1775-8785(04)93145-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mrizak, N., Assadi, J., Maalel, O., Tabka, F. and Nouira, L. (2004) évaluation de la souffrance des soignants par l’analyse du concept de l’épuisement professionnel. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l’Environnement, 65, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1775-8785(04)93147-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bouattour, R.M., Trigui, D., Hajjaji, M., Baati, I., Feki, I. and Masmoudi, J. (2016) Stress au travail chez le personnel soignant en psychiatrie. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l’Environnement, 77, 402-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.admp.2016.03.105</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onasoga Olayinka, A., Osamudiamen, O.S. and Ojo, A.A. (2013) Occupational Stress Management among Nurses in Selected Hospital in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3, 473-481.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tripodi, D., Keriven-Dessomme, B., Lombrail, P., Bourut Lacouture, M., Chabot, A., Cantineau, A., et al. (2007) évaluation des risques professionnels per&amp;#231;us chez le personnel du centre hospitalo-universitaire de Nantes. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles et de l’Environnement, 68, 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1775-8785(07)78217-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.127900-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vaillant, N. and Wolf, F. (2010) Stress, anxiété et dépression au travail: Existe-t-il des différences entre entreprises? Revue Fran&amp;#231;aise d’Economie, 25, 39-74. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfe.104.0039</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>