<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ACES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0392</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aces.2023.133018</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ACES-126711</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  An Experimental Observation of the Thermal Effects and NO Emissions during Dissociation and Oxidation of Ammonia in the Presence of a Bundle of Thermocouples in a Vertical Flow Reactor
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samuel</surname><given-names>Ronald Holden</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhezi</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jian</surname><given-names>Gao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Junzhi</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dongke</surname><given-names>Zhang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Shanxi Institute of Energy, Taiyuan, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>College of Urban Transportation and Logistics, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Centre for Energy (M473), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>250</fpage><lpage>264</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31,</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Ammonia (
  NH
  <sub>3</sub>
  ) dissociation and oxidation in a cylindrical quartz reactor has been experimentally studied for various inlet NH
  <sub>3</sub>
   concentrations (5%, 10%, and 15%) and reactor temperatures between 700
   
  K and 1000
   
  K. The thermal effects during both NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation (endothermic) and oxidation (exothermic) were observed using a bundle of thermocouples positioned along the central axis of the quartz reactor, while the corresponding NH<sub>3</sub> conversions and nitrogen oxides emissions were determined by analysing the gas composition of the reactor exit stream. A stronger endothermic effect, as indicated by a greater temperature drop during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation, was observed as the NH<sub>3</sub> feed concentration and reactor temperature increased. During NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation, a predominantly greater exothermic effect with increasing NH<sub>3</sub> feed concentration and reactor temperature was also evident
  ;
   however, it was apparent that NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation occurred near the reactor inlet, preceding the downstream NH<sub>3</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> oxidation. For both NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation, NH<sub>3</sub> conversion increased with increasing temperature and decreasing initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentration. Significant levels of NO<sub>X</sub> emissions were observed during NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation, which increased with increasing temperature. From the experimental results, it is speculated that the stainless-steel in the thermocouple bundle may have catalysed NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and thus changed the reaction chemistry during NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Ammonia</kwd><kwd> NH3 Dissociation</kwd><kwd> NH3 Oxidation</kwd><kwd> Flow Reactor</kwd><kwd> Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)</kwd><kwd> Thermal Effects</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recent years have seen a growing interest in ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) as a potential renewable and carbon-free fuel when it is produced from renewable hydrogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref1">1</xref>] . Unlike conventional fossil fuels, the combustion of NH<sub>3</sub> does not emit carbon oxides (CO, CO<sub>2</sub>), sulphur oxides (SO<sub>X</sub>), or particulate matter (PM) emissions. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> indicates the volumetric and gravimetric energy densities of various fuels. Ammonia is typically stored and transported as a liquid at −33˚C and 1.1 ~ 1.5 bar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref3">3</xref>] under which conditions the respective gravimetric and volumetric energy densities are 22.5 MJ/kg and 15.6 MJ/L [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref5">5</xref>] . The energy densities of NH<sub>3</sub> are thus comparable to several other commonly used fuels, with a volumetric energy density higher than its renewable alternative, H<sub>2</sub>, which contends with high storage and transport costs. Several challenges face the use of NH<sub>3</sub> as a fuel in typical combustion systems, including high ignition energy and autoignition temperature, high lower flammability limit, slow flame propagation speed, and potential nitrogen oxides (NO<sub>X</sub>) formation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref9">9</xref>] . This can result in low flame stability and reduced combustion intensity which yields decreased operability and efficiency. Additionally, the potential formation and ultimate emission of NO<sub>X</sub> associated with burning NH<sub>3</sub> is a major environmental concern</p><p>which needs to be carefully studied and, if required, countermeasures developed as it can act as a greenhouse gas, causes acid rain and urban haze, and is toxic to life [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref4">4</xref>] . Like many other commercially used fuels, NH<sub>3</sub> combustion involves several safety hazards including toxicity in its release or in the release of NO<sub>X</sub> upon combustion, as well as generic flammability and explosion risks.</p><p>The Centre for Energy at The University of Western Australia has launched a significant scientific research programme to investigate combustion performance and NO<sub>X</sub> formation during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation in several different types of reactors (flow reactor, fixed-bed reactor, and fluidised-bed reactor) in an aim to realise improved combustion efficiencies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref11">11</xref>] . The present contribution reports a preliminary experimental investigation into the thermal effects during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation in a flow reactor. Based on the reactor temperature profiles and effluent gas composition data for varying inlet NH<sub>3</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> concentrations in argon (Ar) and furnace set temperatures, some interesting phenomenological observations can be made, thereby assisting in the interpretation and understanding of heat release intensities of the prevailing reactions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows a schematic diagram of the experimental system. Gases were dosed to the system using mass flow controllers before being combined in a mixer containing small quartz granules and fed into the reactor from the top. The quartz tube reactor (25.4 mm OD and 3 mm wall thickness) was held in a split-tube furnace (model TCH-T1200-II) which provided heating to the reactor across two 200 mm zones. A bundle of 8 thermocouples attached to a central DIA = 2 mm stainless-steel rod was positioned along the central axis of the reactor to provide a temperature profile that was originally considered as a means of identifying the thermal effects associated with NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation. The reactor exit stream gas lines were heated to and maintained at ~150˚C using an electric heating tape to prevent condensation of water vapour. H<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and NH<sub>3</sub> were measured using a modified gas chromatograph (Agilent 78980A) while NO was measured using a chemiluminescent analyser (Thermo Scientific 42i-HL). The NO analyser requires the removal of H<sub>2</sub>O and NH<sub>3</sub> from the gas sample before entering the analyser and this was achieved via the three-stage process: knockout container, water bubbler, and Perma Pure dryer (model PD-50T-12MSS).</p><p>This experimental campaign was designed to observe the impact of initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentration and furnace temperature on the thermal effects during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation. The flow rate and equivalence ratios were fixed at 1500 mL/min and ɸ = 1, respectively. Initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations of 5%, 10%, and 15% were tested. Before introducing reactants into the feed, the system was purged with 1500 mL/min Ar and, when the temperature profile stabilised, the data acquisition system was initiated and MFCs set to the desired experimental conditions. A steady-state was deemed to be achieved when the temperature profile</p><p>was once again found to stabilise, following which the gas concentration data was collected. Species concentration measurement was taken 3 times to ensure accuracy and reproducibility of data.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Ammonia dissociation and oxidation are considered separately to understand the role of dissociation in the more complex oxidation reaction. The use of the thermocouple bundle was intended to provide a qualitative indication of the location and extent of the reactions which, coupled with the NH<sub>3</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>, and NO outlet data, provides the tools for an insightful appreciation of reaction characteristics.</p><p>Since the temperature profile along the reactor length is a key indicator of reaction behaviour, reference temperature profiles were collected for an inert environment with Ar passing through the reactor at a flow rate of 1500 mL/min at the different furnace set temperatures. These temperature profiles, as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, provide the baselines for the interpretation of temperature changes in the reactor during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. NH<sub>3</sub> Dissociation</title><p>The reactor temperature and exit stream species concentration profiles during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation at different initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations and furnace set temperatures are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>, respectively. Plots of NH<sub>3</sub></p><p>conversion, N<sub>2</sub> yield, and H<sub>2</sub> yield, calculated as a result of the species concentration data, are offered in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p><p>It is evident that the endothermic NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation reaction took place under all experimental conditions, with the conversion/yield plots following generic ‘S’ curves, where majority of the reaction occurred at 800 K - 900 K before completion at 1000 K. As expected, the NH<sub>3</sub> conversion and N<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> yield increased with increasing furnace temperature for all initial conditions. The preliminary NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation experiments in a flow reactor without the presence of the thermocouple bundle indicated that, for a 5% NH<sub>3</sub> in Ar feed, the dissociation reaction would proceed to ~1%, ~1.4%, and ~2.8% completion for furnace temperatures of 1150 K, 1250 K, and 1400 K, respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref10">10</xref>] . Other studies showed reaction onset temperatures of 1100 K - 1200 K with full NH<sub>3</sub> conversion at 1700 K [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref13">13</xref>] . Clearly, there is a large disparity between the dataset from the present work and those documented in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref13">13</xref>] , indicating that the stainless-steel thermocouple bundle catalysed NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation.</p><p>The greatest change in thermocouple temperatures (∆T = reference temperature − reaction temperature) was observed at 200 mm - 400 mm for all initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations and furnace temperatures and so it is deduced that a substantial part</p><p>of the dissociation reaction occurred in this region. The majority of the reaction was detected around 300 mm (start of the furnace heated zone), indicating that while the thermocouples located upstream of 300 mm were operating at temperatures noticeably below the furnace setpoint, small amounts of NH<sub>3</sub> conversion was still occurring in this location, while positions further downstream of 300 mm experienced endothermic heat of the residual reaction.</p><p>At higher initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations, an overall reduction in the thermocouple temperatures was observed, suggesting that as the reaction was operating at lower temperatures, decreased NH<sub>3</sub> conversion is expected. This is supported by the experimental observation herein and elsewhere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref12">12</xref>] of lower initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations achieving increased NH<sub>3</sub> conversion at equivalent furnace temperatures when compared to higher initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> illustrates the elemental nitrogen balance during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation at different furnace set temperatures and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> shows the corresponding H<sub>2</sub>:N<sub>2</sub> ratios. The nitrogen balance is defined as:</p><p>NitrogenBalance% = MolesofNH 3 inProduct + 2 &#215; MolesofN 2 inProduct MolesofNH 3 inFeed &#215; 100 (1)</p><p>The nitrogen balance improves with increasing NH<sub>3</sub> in the feed which is primarily attributed to larger GC peak area, leading to more accurate NH<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> measurement. The H<sub>2</sub>:N<sub>2</sub> ratio is poor at 700 K due to little NH<sub>3</sub> conversion and thus a greater uncertainty due to nearly undetectable H<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> peak areas, resulting in enormous measurement error. Reasonable NH<sub>3</sub> conversion occurred between 800 K and 1000 K which is reflected by 2.9 &lt; H<sub>2</sub>:N<sub>2</sub> &lt; 3.2. Given the indicative purpose of the findings presented in this paper and the uncertainties associated with the experimental setup (particularly small peak area GC measurement), the species concentration data can be accepted with a reasonable degree of confidence.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. NH<sub>3</sub> Oxidation</title><p>The reactor temperature and exit stream species concentration profiles during NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation at different initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations and furnace set temperatures are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0, respectively. Plots of NH<sub>3</sub></p><p>conversion, O<sub>2</sub> conversion, and N<sub>2</sub> yield, calculated as a result of the species concentration data, are offered in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1.</p><p>The consumption of NH<sub>3</sub> and O<sub>2</sub>, production of N<sub>2</sub>, and overall increase in temperature along the reactor, suggest that the exothermic NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation reaction occurred under all conditions tested, with significant reactant conversion between 900 K and 1000 K. According to the temperature profiles, it appears that the dissociation reaction took place early in the reactor (indicated by decreases in temperatures at 150 mm, 200 mm, and 250 mm under some conditions), while the exothermic oxidation reaction (indicated by increases in temperatures) proceeds further downstream with the greatest change in temperature being shown at 300 mm (start of the furnace heated zone). Like the dissociation reaction, lower initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations resulted in greater reactant conversion at equivalent furnace temperatures compared to higher initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations, thus highlighting the significance of NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation in the oxidative environment.</p><p>For the various NH<sub>3</sub> feed concentrations tested (except 5% NH<sub>3</sub> at 700 K), O<sub>2</sub> conversion was the highest, followed closely by NH<sub>3</sub> conversion and subsequently N<sub>2</sub> yield. As reactant conversion and product yield increase, however, the gap widens between the NH<sub>3</sub> or O<sub>2</sub> conversion and the N<sub>2</sub> yield. This coincides with the formation of N<sub>2</sub>O (observed on the GC) and high quantities of NO being read by the NO<sub>X</sub> analyser, which is particularly evident at 1000 K, for example, where NO readings were out of the NO<sub>X</sub> analyser instrument range (&gt;10,000 ppm) and a prominent new peak was observed on the GC, suggesting that there was a high quantity of NO<sub>X</sub> present in the product. This notion is supported in the nitrogen balance (calculated according to Equation (1)) which becomes worse with increasing temperature (and thus NH<sub>3</sub> conversion), as indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2.</p><p>As the furnace set temperature and thus reactant conversion and product yield increased, the NO level in the exit stream (depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0(d)) also increased, which is expected as increasing temperature enhances the rate of oxidation of NH<sub>3</sub> which, in the absence of N<sub>2</sub> in the feed stream, is the only source of NO. Additionally, the NO in the flue increased with decreasing initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentration. This is very interesting and may be attributed to NO reduction by NH<sub>3</sub> at higher initial NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations via selective catalytic reduction (SCR) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref16">16</xref>] where the stainless-steel thermocouple bundle may serve as a catalyst, or by selective non-catalytic reduction mechanisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>One piece of our previous work on NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation in a flow reactor indicated vastly different results to those observed herein, reporting an onset reaction temperature of ~1300 K, and reaction completion at ~1400 K for 5.3% NH<sub>3</sub> (at ϕ = 1.0) in the feed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref11">11</xref>] . This data indicated negligible NO<sub>X</sub> formation until 1300 K, above which NO was found to range from 350 - 600 ppm. Other papers have indicated the onset temperatures of reaction between 1000 K and 1200 K, and significantly lower NO levels than those in the present work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref21">21</xref>] . The discrepancies between the data of other papers and that presented herein can only be attributed to the presence of the stainless-steel thermocouple bundle which catalysed NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation leading to lower onset reaction temperatures and greater NO formation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Interference of the Thermocouple Bundle</title><p>A comparison of the dissociation and oxidation NH<sub>3</sub> conversion trends, as</p><p>depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>3, produce some peculiar observations from this experimental work. At furnace temperatures of 700 K and 800 K, the NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation runs returned slightly higher NH<sub>3</sub> conversions than the dissociation runs, however, at elevated furnace temperatures, greater NH<sub>3</sub> conversion during dissociation than during oxidation was observed. At 900 K, for example, the NH<sub>3</sub> conversion in oxidation was approximately half of the NH<sub>3</sub> conversion in dissociation and at 1000 K, dissociation proceeded to full completion while oxidation only experienced ~88% NH<sub>3</sub> conversion. While the reasons underpinning these observations are only speculative, it is hypothesised that the stainless-steel sheaths of the thermocouples and the central stainless-steel rod to which the thermocouples were attached catalysed NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref22">22</xref>] and thus changed the reaction chemistry during NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation. Iron is known to catalyse NH<sub>3</sub> synthesis at relatively low temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref25">25</xref>] and catalyse NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation at high temperatures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref28">28</xref>] so it is not surprising that greater NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation was observed. During the NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation runs, partial NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation took place before the reacting mixture reached the heating zone of the reactor assembly, where the presence of H<sub>2</sub> from NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation is expected to have preferentially reacted with O<sub>2</sub>, leaving less O<sub>2</sub> available to oxidise the remaining NH<sub>3</sub>.</p><p>In both dissociation and oxidation experimental runs, the heat conduction and catalytic effects of the stainless-steel thermocouple bundle should not be ignored. Assuming the thermocouple bundle provides no catalytic activity, the temperature profile may not necessarily be the same should the experiments have been conducted without such in-situ temperature measurement as heat can be conducted along the thermocouple bundle thereby providing heating or cooling effects to the reactor gas and thus altering the reaction behaviour, as observed. Additionally, it is anticipated that the stainless-steel provided a catalytic effect on the chemical reactions as the data presented herein shows equivalently higher NH<sub>3</sub> conversion and elevated NO formation compared to other reports including our own previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126711-ref11">11</xref>] which do not utilise a thermocouple bundle. Although it is expected to influence the reaction, the thermocouple bundle is a simple and easy in-situ means to observe the thermal effects during NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation to provide valuable insight into the location and extent of the endothermicity or exothermicity of reactions. However, future experimental work aimed to study the reaction mechanisms of NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation and combustion must not use bare thermocouples in the reacting stream.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Ammonia dissociation and oxidation and associated NO emission in a flow reactor fitted with a thermocouple bundle has been experimentally observed for varying NH<sub>3</sub> inlet concentrations and reaction temperatures. Both NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation were observed to take place between 700 K and 1000 K, with increasing furnace temperature resulting in increasing NH<sub>3</sub> conversion. For NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation, the reactant conversion and product yield vs furnace temperature plots followed generic “S” curve trends with increasing furnace temperature leading to increasing reactant conversion and product yield. This set of experiments indicated a nitrogen balance of &gt;90% and a H<sub>2</sub>:N<sub>2</sub> ratio of ~3 for all experimental runs, indicating strong validity of the experimental system and confidence in the collected data. For NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation, thermocouple measurements were able to provide insight into the reaction characteristics and demonstrated that NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation preceded its oxidation. During NH<sub>3</sub> oxidation, NO was observed to increase with increasing temperature, with values &gt;10,000 ppm at 88% NH<sub>3</sub> conversion (1000 K). Interestingly, as temperature and thus NH<sub>3</sub> conversion increased, NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation was more prominent than its oxidation which is expected to be largely attributed to the catalytic effect of the stainless-steel thermocouple bundle which has also been observed to increase NH<sub>3</sub> conversion and NO emission for all experiments conducted herein. This work thus offers an important scientific contribution in determining the characteristics of NH<sub>3</sub> dissociation and oxidation in a flow reactor containing a stainless-steel thermocouple bundle and provides a warning for future researchers to be aware of the high temperature catalytic influence that stainless-steel is expected to have in NH<sub>3</sub> studies.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work receives financial support from the Australian Research Council under the Discovery Projects Scheme (DP210103766 and DP220100116) and the Future Energy Export CRC (FEnEX CRC Project # 21.RP2.0059). S.R. Holden receives a Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship, and an Ad Hoc Postgraduate Top up Scholarship from the UWA Centre for Energy.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Holden, S.R., Zhang, Z.Z., Gao, J., Wu, J.Z. and Zhang, D.K. (2023) An Experimental Observation of the Thermal Effects and NO Emissions during Dissociation and Oxidation of Ammonia in the Presence of a Bundle of Thermocouples in a Vertical Flow Reactor. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 13, 250-264. https://doi.org/10.4236/aces.2023.133018</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126711-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Riahi, K. and Roehrl, R.A. (2000) Energy Technology Strategies for Carbon Dioxide Mitigation and Sustainable Development. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 3, 89-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03354032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Hignett, T.P. (1985) Transportation and Storage of Ammonia. In: Hignett, T.P., Eds., Fertilizer Manual, Springer, Dordrecht, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1538-6_7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ullman, F. (2000) Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Valera-Medina, A., Xiao, H., Owen-Jones, M., David, W.I.F. and Bowen, P.J. (2018) Ammonia for Power. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 69, 63-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zamfirescu, C. and Dincer, I. (2009) Ammonia as a Green Fuel and Hydrogen Source for Vehicular Applications. Fuel Processing Technology, 90, 729-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.02.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Appl, M. (1999) Ammonia: Principles and Industrial Practice. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527613885</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Flank, W.H., Abraham, M.A. and Matthews, M.A. (2009) Innovations in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry: A Century of Achievements and Prospects for the New Millennium. American Chemical Society, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2009-1000</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Modak, J.M. (2011) Haber Process for Ammonia Synthesis. Resonance, 16, 1159-1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12045-011-0130-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Smith, C., Hill, A.K. and Torrente-Murciano, L. (2020) Current and Future Role of Haber–Bosch Ammonia in a Carbon-Free Energy Landscape. Energy &amp; Environmental Science, 13, 331-344. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EE02873K</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, R., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Cheng, F., Liu, Y., Gao, J., Holden, S.R. and Zhang, D. (2022) An Experimental Study of Ammonia Dissociation in a Fixed-Bed Reactor Packed with Quartz Particles. Clearwater Clean Energy Conference, Clearwater, 1-4 August 2022, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huo, Y., Zhang, R., Zhu, S., Gao, J., Holden, S.R., Zhu, M., Zhang, Z. and Zhang, D. (2022) A Preliminary Experimental Investigation into Ammonia Oxidation in a Fixed-Bed. International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment, 23, 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1615/InterJEnerCleanEnv.2022039811</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ben&amp;#233;s, M., Pozo, G., Abi&amp;#225;n, M., Millera, &amp;#193;., Bilbao, R. and Alzueta, M.U. (2021) Experimental Study of the Pyrolysis of NH3 under Flow Reactor Conditions. Energy &amp; fuels, 35, 7193-7200. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manna, M.V., Sabia, P., Ragucci, R. and de Joannon, M. (2020) Oxidation and Pyrolysis of Ammonia Mixtures in Model Reactors. Fuel, 264, Article ID: 116768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116768</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gómez-García, M.A., Pitchon, V. and Kiennemann, A. (2005) Pollution by Nitrogen Oxides: An Approach to NOX Abatement by Using Sorbing Catalytic Materials. Environment International, 31, 445-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Husnain, N., Wang, E., Li, K., Anwar, M.T., Mehmood, A., Gul, M., Li, D. and Mao, J. (2019) Iron Oxide-Based Catalysts for Low-Temperature Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOX with NH3. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 35, 239-264. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2017-0064</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, Z., Chen, G., Shao, Z., Zhang, H. and Guo, X. (2022) The Effect of Iron Content on the Ammonia Selective Catalytic Reduction Reaction (NH3-SCR) Catalytic Performance of FeOX/SAPO-34. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 14749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214749</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Javed, M.T., Ahmed, Z., Ibrahim, M.A. and Irfan, N. (2008) A Comparative Kinetic Study of SNCR Process Using Ammonia. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322008000100012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Locci, C., Vervisch, L., Farcy, B., Domingo, P. and Perret, N. (2018) Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions: A Perspective from Numerical Modeling. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 100, 301-340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-017-9842-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sorrels, J.L., Randall, D.D., Fry, C.R. and Schaffner, K.S. (2019) Selective Noncatalytic Reduction. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakamura, H., Hasegawa, S. and Tezuka, T. (2017) Kinetic Modeling of Ammonia/Air Weak Flames in a Micro Flow Reactor with a Controlled Temperature Profile. Combustion and Flame, 185, 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.06.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stagni, A., Cavallotti, C., Arunthanayothin, S., Song, Y., Herbinet, O., Battin-Leclerc, F. and Faravelli, T. (2020) An Experimental, Theoretical and Kinetic-Modeling Study of the Gas-Phase Oxidation of Ammonia. Reaction Chemistry &amp; Engineering, 5, 696-711. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RE00429G</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feng, P., Lee, M., Wang, D. and Suzuki, Y. (2023) Ammonia Thermal Decomposition on Quartz and Stainless Steel Walls. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jennings, J.R. (1991) Catalytic Ammonia Synthesis, Fundamentals and Practice. Plenum Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9592-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, H. (2013) Ammonia Synthesis Catalysts: Innovation and Practice. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd and Chemical Industry Press, Singapore and Beijing.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, H. (2014) Ammonia Synthesis Catalyst 100 Years: Practice, Enlightenment and Challenge. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 35, 1619-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60118-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arabczyk, W. and Zam&amp;#322;ynny, J. (1999) Study of the Ammonia Decomposition over Iron Catalysts. Catalysis Letters, 60, 167-171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019007024041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pelka, R., Moszyńska, I. and Arabczyk, W. (2009) Catalytic Ammonia Decomposition Over Fe/Fe4N. Catalysis Letters, 128, 72-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-008-9758-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126711-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lucentini, I., Garcia, X., Vendrell, X. and Llorca, J. (2021) Review of the Decomposition of Ammonia to Generate Hydrogen. Industrial &amp; Engineering Chemistry Research, 60, 18560-18611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c00843</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>