<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AID</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Infectious Diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2648</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aid.2023.132030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AID-126071</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Uropathogenic &lt;i&gt;Klebsiella&lt;/i&gt; Species in Port Harcourt
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>Ikechi Mike-Ogburia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tombari</surname><given-names>Pius Monsi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Easter</surname><given-names>Godwin Nwokah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>333</fpage><lpage>353</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22,</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30,</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2023</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Background: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a severe public health issue that affects a wide range of people around the world with 
  <em>Klebsiella </em>pneumoniae accounting for up to 25% of all urinary tract infections. The higher rate of UTI associated with uropathogenic 
  <em>Klebsiella </em>species has been associated with the emergence of hypervirulent and antibiotic-resistant strains facilitated by the misuse and overuse of antibiotics as well as other sociodemographic and behavioural practices of susceptible individuals. This study was aimed at investigating the prevalence and associated risk factors of uropathogenic
  <em> Klebsiella </em>species in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. 
  Methodology: The study employed a descriptive cross-sectional study design comprising 300 subjects clinically suspected of having urinary tract infections attending the Rivers State University Medical Centre and the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital between March to August 2022. A standard urine culture procedure was used to ascertain significant bacteriuria after which 
  <em>Klebsiella</em> colonies were isolated and identified using standard bacteriological techniques. The data generated from this study was represented as frequency and percentages, and inferential statistics were carried out using Chi-square with the aid of GraphPad Prism Software Version 9. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of less than 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval. 
  Result: The prevalence of uropathogenic 
  <em>Klebsiella</em> sp. was 16%, with sex, pregnancy status, and religion of the individuals substantially linked (
  <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) with the incidence of the infection. Frequent antibiotic usage, a prior UTI infection, hospitalisation within the last six months, and a greater number of previous pregnancies were also identified as significant (
  <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) risk factors for infection with uropathogenic 
  <em>Klebsiella </em>species. 
  Conclusion: This study reports a relatively high prevalence of uropathogenic 
  <em>Klebsiella </em>species at 16%, with the sex and pregnancy status of the subjects being significantly associated (
  <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) with the prevalence of the infection. Frequent antibiotic use, previous UTI infection, hospitalization in the last 6 months as well as a higher number of previous pregnancies were also found to be significantly associated with the prevalence of uropathogenic 
  <em>Klebsiella </em>species in the current study. Health promotion and awareness efforts should be prioritised to inform susceptible demographics about their risks for urinary tract infections associated with uropathogenic
  <em> Klebsiella </em>species via targeted educational campaigns, collaboration with healthcare providers, use of social media and online platforms, workplace wellness programs, and community outreach programs amongst others. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing before prescriptions and treatment should be emphasized and upheld in all clinical settings.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Uropathogenic</kwd><kwd> UTI</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Klebsiella&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Prevalence</kwd><kwd> Risk Factors</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common health concern caused by microbial pathogens within the urinary tract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref1">1</xref>] . Escherichia coli (E. coli) is the most common cause of UTIs, accounting for 75% of all bacterial UTI cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref1">1</xref>] . Other bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis have also been reported as causative agents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref1">1</xref>] . Uropathogenic E. coli and Klebsiella species are the most common cause of UTIs in both community and healthcare settings [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref2">2</xref>] . These species are successful pathogens in the urinary system, as they possess the relevant virulence factors required to successfully survive on and adhere to the urinary epithelium, cause tissue damage, and evade host immune responses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref2">2</xref>] . There has been an increase in the incidence of antimicrobial resistance by uropathogenic bacteria responsible for UTIs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref3">3</xref>] ; with the misuse and overuse of antibiotics often associated with the emergence of these antibiotic-resistant bacteria, making UTIs more difficult to treat effectively. In Nigeria, where antibiotic stewardship may be inadequate, the prevalence of drug-resistant UTIs remains a significant concern.</p><p>Socioeconomic factors play a crucial role in UTI risk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref5">5</xref>] . Poverty and overcrowded living conditions often prevail in certain regions of Nigeria, increasing the likelihood of bacterial transmission [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref6">6</xref>] . Limited access to healthcare services and delayed medical intervention further compound the risk, as untreated or poorly managed UTIs can lead to more severe complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref7">7</xref>] . Furthermore, certain demographic factors can make individuals more vulnerable to UTIs. Women, for instance, are generally at a higher risk due to anatomical differences, such as a shorter urethra, which allows bacteria to ascend more easily into the bladder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref8">8</xref>] . Pregnancy and menopause further increase the susceptibility of women to UTIs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref10">10</xref>] . In men, structural abnormalities of the urinary tract, such as an enlarged prostate, can increase the risk [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>Klebsiella species are a common cause of urinary tract infections (UTIs), accounting for 3% - 20% of cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref2">2</xref>] . In a study conducted in Dhaka city, Klebsiella species were the most common bacteria causing UTIs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref13">13</xref>] . Another study found that Klebsiella was the second most prevalent uropathogen after Escherichia coli, representing 42.29% - 56.75% of isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref2">2</xref>] . These bacteria possess virulence factors that enable them to survive and adhere to the urinary epithelium, causing tissue damage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref2">2</xref>] . Klebsiella quasipneumoniae, a relatively newly defined species of Klebsiella, has also been shown to cause UTIs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref14">14</xref>] . The absence of the C-terminal phosphodiesterase domain of FimK in K. quasipneumoniae may lead to a loss of type 3 fimbrial cross-regulation, which is critical for bladder epithelial cell attachment in vitro [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Infection with uropathogenic Klebsiella (UPK) species has been significantly associated with risk factors such as being over the age of sixty, history of renal stone, urinary tract anatomical or physiological disorder, urologic intervention, history of urinary tract surgery, history of urinary catheterization, hospitalization for the last year, and antibiotic usage in the last 3 months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref15">15</xref>] . Another study conducted in Iraq found that the age group of 40 - 49 years was the highest group at risk for K. pneumoniae infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref16">16</xref>] . The female sex has been associated with a higher prevalence of UTIs caused by K. pneumoniae than males, and the males were more susceptible to K. pneumoniae with higher prevalence in the age group of 40 - 49 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>According to research, the incidence of community-acquired urinary tract infections caused by uropathogenic Klebsiella (UPK) species is rising in Nigeria, with rates as high as 18% in southern Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref17">17</xref>] . A Nigerian tertiary institution was reported to have an even higher prevalence (25.5%) of urinary tract infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae in another study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref18">18</xref>] . These findings imply that UPKs are a significant cause of UTIs in Southern Nigeria and are quite common among UTI patients. In order to comprehend the epidemiology of UTIs in the region and to direct the proper care and preventive measures for UTIs, this study was aimed at investigating the prevalence and associated risk factors of uropathogenic Klebsiella species in Port Harcourt Nigeria.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Design</title><p>The investigation was carried out using a cross-sectional study design with systematic random sampling from March to August 2022. Subjects were assigned random numbers for systematic random sampling and the sample interval was set at 5 with the index number chosen at random.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Study Area</title><p>The study was carried out in the Rivers State University Medical Centre as well as the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt. Port Harcourt is the capital of Rivers State, Nigeria (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>), it lies along the Bonny River and is located in the Niger Delta with a population of 1,148,665. Rivers State University Medical Centre is a public facility located within the premises of the Rivers State University Campus. It is the primary healthcare facility tasked with catering to the medical needs of the staff and students of the university community. The Rivers State University Hospital is a tertiary hospital owned by the government of Rivers State, located at 6 - 8 Harley Street, Old GRA Port Harcourt. It has well over 375 licensed beds and 731 medical staff with departments including Medicine, Pediatrics, Laboratory Services, Radiology, Family Medicine, Pathology, Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology, Surgery, Pharmacy, Accidents and Emergency and General Administration.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Study Population and Sample Size Determination</title><p>The study population comprised patients clinically suspected of having urinary tract infections attending the Rivers State University Medical Centre and the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital. Patients suspecting urinary tract infections (UTIs) may experience a unique set of symptoms related to the urinary</p><p>system such as a frequency, urgency, dysuria, pain or burning sensation during urination, cloudy or strong-smelling urine, haematuria, pain or pressure in the lower abdomen or back, and fever or chills if the infection has spread to the kidneys. The sample size of 300 was obtained using a sample size calculator for prevalence studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref20">20</xref>] , based on the expected prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species in Port Harcourt as reported by Kinika et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref18">18</xref>] which revealed a prevalence of 25.5%.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria</title><p>An indication of the signs and symptoms of UTI as well as willingness to provide informed consent were the basis for inclusion in the study while terminally ill patients, as well as females currently in their menstrual period, were excluded from participating in the study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Ethical Considerations</title><p>The aim of the study was duly communicated to the subject prior to obtaining informed consent. The investigation was conducted in compliance with international ethical norms and the study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Rivers of the State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH/REC/2021109) and the Rivers State University Medical Centre (RSU/MED/HSD/87).</p></sec><sec id="s2_6"><title>2.6. Data Collection</title><p>A structured and validated questionnaire adapted from previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref7">7</xref>] was administered to subjects to obtain sociodemographic and other information. The questionnaire had a total of 13 items with two sections; the first section assessed sociodemographic characteristics while the second assessed other risk factors. Serial numbers were used to tally responses and results to ensure subjects’ anonymity.</p></sec><sec id="s2_7"><title>2.7. Specimen Collection and Processing</title><p>Three hundred (300) urine samples were collected either by midstream clean-catch, catheterization, or urine bags using an aseptic technique, and were then promptly conveyed to the microbiology laboratory for processing. Where delay was envisaged, samples were stored in the refrigerator at 4˚C. Samples were inoculated onto blood agar and cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar. After inoculation, 10 ml aliquots of each sample were centrifuged at 300 rpm and deposits were examined for bacteria, parasites, and other cellular bodies. Cultures were incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours and urinary tract infection was defined as bacterial growth of 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/ml. Isolates were identified by morphological and biochemical characteristics.</p></sec><sec id="s2_8"><title>2.8. Data Analysis</title><p>Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted using Graph Pad Prism version 9. The data were presented as frequencies and percentages in tables and charts. Chi-square was utilised to identify statistically significant relationships between the prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species and sociodemographic and other risk factors. The level of significance was defined as p &lt; 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>A total of 300 subjects aged between 16 to 69 (mean age = 29.42 years) participated in the study. Most of the subjects were between the ages of 21 - 30 years (44.7%), mostly females (57.7%), single (72.3%) and with at least secondary school education (43.7%) and students predominated the study (40%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The most prevalent sign/symptom reported by the subjects in the current study was frequent urination (28%), followed by itching (15.7%) and yellowish discharges (8.7%). Painful urination (6.3%), nocturia (5.7%) and lower abdominal pain (5.7%) were also reported (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Samples obtained from the subjects were analysed for the presence of uropathogenic bacteria. The prevalence of Klebsiella infection was 16% as only 48 subjects yielded Klebsiella isolates out of 300 subjects. The most prevalent uropathogenic bacteria was Escherichia coli with a prevalence of 18.7% while the least was Proteus species (1.3%). Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were also reported in the study at 7% and 1.3% respectively as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>The female subjects had a significantly (p &lt; 0.001) higher prevalence of 24.3% in comparison to their male counterpart (4.7%). A significantly higher prevalence of 41.3% (p = 0.0017) was reported among the pregnant female subjects while 18.1% was recorded among females who are not pregnant. A higher prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species was observed among subjects aged 41 - 50 years (28.1%), widowed subjects (25%), subjects separated/divorced (25%), subjects with no formal education (33.3%) and the unemployed (25.6%); however, the age of the subjects, marital status, level of education and occupation were not significantly associated with the prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species (p &gt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>As regards the pattern of antibiotic use, a prevalence of 4.3% was recorded amongst subjects who rarely used antibiotics, 16% was recorded amongst those who occasionally used antibiotics while a higher prevalence of 23.1% was recorded amongst subjects who frequently used antibiotics. The observed distribution based on the pattern of antibiotic use was statistically significant (p = 0.0178). A higher Klebsiella prevalence of 40.3% was found among subjects who have had previous UTI infection while those who have not had previous UTI infection recorded a prevalence of 21.1% resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0037). There was a significantly higher prevalence (p = 0.0190) of uropathogenic Klebsiella species in subjects who have been hospitalised in the</p><p>last 6 months (37%) than those who have not (20.1%). Females who have had three or more previous pregnancies reported a significantly higher prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species (36.1%) than those who have had less than three previous pregnancies (17.9%). A higher prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species was observed among subjects who used antibiotics only for severe infections (21.4%), individuals who engaged in three or more sexual intercourse per week (18.6%), and those without multiple sexual partners (13.9%); however, the rationale for antibiotic use, number of sexual intercourse per week and multiple</p><p>sexual partners was not significantly associated with the prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species (p &gt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Urinary tract infection continues to be one of the most prevalent causes of morbidity in people of all demographics and one of the leading causes of hospital visits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref22">22</xref>] , with Klebsiella species being the second most frequently implicated pathogen for urinary tract infections, trailing only E. coli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref24">24</xref>] . The</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species and sociodemographic characteristics</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Negative (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >χ<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Age</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≤20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (11.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (88.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0.2288</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 - 30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (14.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115 (85.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 - 40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (15.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (84.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 - 50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (28.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (71.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5 (23.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (76.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (4.72)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 (95.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >&lt;0.0001*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (24.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131 (75.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Marital Status</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Single</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (14.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >186 (85.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >217 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >2.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0.5265</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Married</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (18.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (81.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Widowed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Separated/Divorced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (75)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Pregnancy Status (N = 173)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pregnant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (41.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (58.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >9.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0017*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Not pregnant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23 (18.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104 (81.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (24.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131 (75.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Level of Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No formal education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 (33.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 (66.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="5"  >0.2216</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Primary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (17)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 (83)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Secondary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24 (18.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (81.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tertiary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (11.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95 (88.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Occupation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Student</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (18.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98 (81.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >0.1899</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unemployed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (25.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32 (74.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Self-Employed</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (10.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34 (89.5)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Private Employment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7 (12.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (87.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Civil servant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (9.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37 (90.2)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Statistical significance p &lt; 0.05.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species and risk factors</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Positive (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Negative (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >χ<sup>2</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >p-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Pattern of antibiotic use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rarely</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 (4.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (95.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0178*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Occasionally</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Frequently</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21 (23.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (76.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Rationale for antibiotic use</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Whenever available</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 (16.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (83.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >0.4321</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mild infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (12.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113 (87.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Severe infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (21.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44 (78.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >On prescription</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9 (18.8)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (81.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Previous UTI infection</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (40.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43 (59.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >8.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0037*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27 (21.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (78.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >128 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Hospitalisation in the last 6 months</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17 (37)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (63)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0190*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31 (20.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123 (79.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Number of Sexual Intercourse per week</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29 (14.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169 (85.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >198 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.3729</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19 (18.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83 (81.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Multiple sex partners</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 (10.6)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101 (89.4)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >113 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.4073</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >No</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26 (13.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >161 (86.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >187 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48 (16)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >252 (84)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >300 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Number of Previous Pregnancy (N = 173)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt; 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 (17.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92 (82.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >112 (100)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0368*</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >≥ 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22 (36.1)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39 (63.9)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61 (100)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42 (24.3)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131 (75.7)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >173 (100)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Statistical significance p &lt; 0.05.</p><p>present study investigated the prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species, recording a prevalence of 16% as 48 out of 300 subjects had significant growth of Klebsiella species in their urine samples. The observed prevalence is comparable to the 17% prevalence of Klebsiella species in urinary tract infections reported by Lin et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref23">23</xref>] . A similar prevalence of 18% was reported in a study conducted in southern Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref17">17</xref>] , which is comparable to the current study. Dada et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref25">25</xref>] reported a slightly higher prevalence of 21.1% of uropathogenic Klebsiella species in Ondo state, Nigeria, while Kinika et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref18">18</xref>] reported an even higher prevalence of 25.5% in a tertiary institution in Port Harcourt. The current study differed from the findings of Ndako et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref17">17</xref>] , who reported a lower prevalence of 9.1% for uropathogenic Klebsiella species. The observed variation may be attributable to the demographic differences of the study population.</p><p>Urinary tract infections can be classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic depending on the presence or absence of symptoms, which aids in the diagnosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref27">27</xref>] . In the current study, the signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections observed by the subjects were also put into consideration. The most predominant symptom reported by the subjects was frequent urination (28%) followed by itching (15.7%) suggestive of lower urinary tract infection. Painful urination and urinary urgency were recorded in smaller percentages of 6.3% and 4.7% respectively. A smaller percentage of the subjects also reported lower abdominal pain (5.7%) and yellowish discharges (8.7%). The findings from the current study as regards reported signs and symptoms are comparable with those of Okonko et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref28">28</xref>] where symptoms like itchy sensation, abdominal pains as well as discharges were reported in the sampled population. The subjects' observations of frequent urination as the most common symptom, followed by itching, painful urination, and urine urgency, are consistent with the typical symptoms of a lower urinary tract infection (UTI). UTIs can cause urinary tract inflammation and bladder irritation, resulting in frequent urine and pain during urination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref27">27</xref>] . Lower abdominal discomfort with yellowish discharges reported by a lesser number of respondents might suggest a more serious illness, such as pyelonephritis or sexually transmitted diseases. These symptoms indicate that the infection has moved to the upper urinary tract or has affected other areas of the genital region.</p><p>In the current study, the age group with the highest prevalence (28.1%) was 41 – 50 years followed by subjects aged 51 years and above (23.8%); the least prevalence was recorded amongst those aged 20 years or younger (11.9). The distribution was not found to be statistically significant (p = 0.2288). This observation varied from the report by Sule &amp; Kumurya (2016) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref29">29</xref>] where the highest prevalence of Klebsiella species in urine was found amongst subjects aged between 21 - 30 years. The study by Obiogbolu et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref30">30</xref>] also reported a higher prevalence in the younger age group of 21-25. The current study however is similar to the findings of Devrari and Pai [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref31">31</xref>] who reported a higher prevalence of Klebsiella species amongst older subjects within age groups of 41 - 50, 51 - 60 and 61 - 70 years old; the study by Ndako et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref18">18</xref>] was also comparable with the present study as the authors recorded a higher prevalence amongst the older age group in their study. While the age distribution of Klebsiella infection in the current study may not be statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05), it is important to note that Klebsiella infections occur in people of all ages; however, the highest risk groups appear to be the elderly, infants, and the immunocompromised [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref31">31</xref>] , indicating that infection with the bacteria is associated with decreased immunocompetence; the observed prevalence of 28.1% among those aged 41 - 50 years may also be due to hormonal changes that occur during menopause, which can increase the risk of UTIs in women. As oestrogen levels fall, vaginal and urethral tissues weaken and dry, rendering them more vulnerable to infection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref32">32</xref>] . Individuals in this age bracket are more likely to have comorbid diseases such as diabetes, which increases the risk of UTIs.</p><p>Female subjects in the current study recorded a significantly higher prevalence of Klebsiella infection than their male counterparts at 24.3% and 4.7% respectively (p &lt; 0.001). Different studies have reported female predominance in urinary tract infections over the years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref35">35</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref24">24</xref>] . Females have a greater prevalence rate due to the closeness of the urethral meatus to the anus, a shorter urethra, contraception, pregnancy, and sexual intercourse, which introduces Bacteria into the female urinary system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref35">35</xref>] . Furthermore, poor anal cleanliness may result in the transmission of normal flora in faeces from the anus to the vagina, from where it may climb to the bladder [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref36">36</xref>] . In contrast, Otajevwo and Amedu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref37">37</xref>] found a prevalence rate of 57.1% among males; though the authors stated that the reason for this was not clear, they did list the probable causes as lack of circumcision, receptive anal intercourse, and HIV infection among their study participants.</p><p>The current study recorded no statistically significant difference in the distribution of Klebsiella infection based on the marital status of the subjects. However, it was observed that singles had the least prevalence followed by married subjects and a higher prevalence was reported amongst widowed subjects as well as separated/divorced subjects. This observation may be related to the subjects' age, as those who are or have been married are more likely to be older than those who have never been married, and as such may be more vulnerable to infection due to reduced immunocompetence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref30">30</xref>] ; it is also possible that being married, separated, or widowed is associated with factors that increase the risk of UTI, such as sexual activity or changes in hormonal levels. The findings from this study as regards the distribution of Klebsiella infection is comparable to the study by Odoki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref38">38</xref>] who reported that married individuals were 2.2 times more likely to be infected with UTI than singles, a more sexually active lifestyle observed amongst these groups of subjects are also likely to be associated with higher infection rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Pregnancy was significantly associated (p = 0.0017) with a higher prevalence of Klebsiella infection in the current study as a 41.3% prevalence was reported among pregnant women while 18.1% was observed amongst those that are not pregnant. Pregnant women are more vulnerable to UTIs due to physiological changes brought on by pregnancy, which are associated with an increased risk of maternal-fetal problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref39">39</xref>] . The urinary tract alterations during pregnancy include ureter and renal pelvic dilatation, which can induce urine stasis and increase the risk of bacterial development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref40">40</xref>] . Furthermore, hormonal changes during pregnancy can promote ureteral smooth muscle relaxation, which can cause urine reflux and raise the risk of UTI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref40">40</xref>] . This observation is comparable to the findings of Okonko et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref28">28</xref>] , who found a 47.5% prevalence of UTI in pregnant women in a South-Western Nigerian state; Ndako et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref41">41</xref>] found a 45% prevalence of UTI in pregnant women, which is also comparable to the findings of the current study.</p><p>The level of education of the subjects in the current study was not significantly associated (p = 0.2216) with the distribution of Klebsiella infection in the current study, however, it was observed that those with no formal education had the highest prevalence of 33.3% while the least prevalence of 11.2% was recorded amongst those with tertiary education, indicating that a better education and enlightenment level can better inform individuals about preventive measures against UTI as opined by Tehrani et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref42">42</xref>] . This finding is contrary to the findings of Ndako et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref17">17</xref>] where a higher prevalence was observed amongst the more educated subjects, however, the current study was comparable to the report by Shaheen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref43">43</xref>] where a lower prevalence was recorded amongst subjects with higher education.</p><p>As regards the occupation of the subjects in the current study, a higher prevalence was recorded amongst students and the unemployed, while those in one form of employment or the other were observed to have the least prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species, this distribution was not statistically significant (p = 0.1899). The distribution reported in the current study as regards occupation contrasted with the study of Okonko et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref28">28</xref>] where employed subjects were found to be more infected than students, Markland et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref44">44</xref>] found that women in the workforce frequently experience urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms and that they modify their behaviours to manage their symptoms, noting that women in manual occupations had higher rates of urinary incontinence and overactive bladder than unemployed women or women in non-manual occupations. The discrepancy between the cited literature and the present study remains unexplained; the discrepancy might be attributable to the specifics of the subjects’ occupations, which were not examined in the current study.</p><p>A prevalence of 4.3% was recorded amongst subjects who rarely used antibiotics, 16% was recorded amongst those who occasionally used antibiotics while a higher prevalence of 23.1% was recorded amongst subjects who frequently used antibiotics. The observed distribution based on the pattern of antibiotic use was statistically significant (p = 0.0178); the rationale for antibiotic use was however not significantly associated (p = 0.4321) with the prevalence of Klebsiella in the current study. This high Klebsiella prevalence among those who used antibiotics occasionally and frequently is not uncommon, as antibiotic abuse or misuse can lead to resistance via the emergence of mutant strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref45">45</xref>] , as unresolved or relapsed UTIs tend to be more resistant to previously used antibiotics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref46">46</xref>] .</p><p>A higher Klebsiella prevalence of 40.3% was found among subjects who have had previous UTI infection while those who have not had previous UTI infection recorded a prevalence of 21.1% resulting in a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0037). UTIs have been identified as a risk factor for future cystitis in both young adult and postmenopausal women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref47">47</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref48">48</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref49">49</xref>] . The current study confirmed that a previous UTI may predispose individuals to subsequent UTIs through behavioural and microbiological factors. These findings are consistent with other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref50">50</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref51">51</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref52">52</xref>] but contrasted with the findings of Hamdan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref53">53</xref>] as well as the results of Kovavisarach et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref54">54</xref>] .</p><p>A significantly higher prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella infection was reported among subjects who have been hospitalised in the last 6 months i.e., 17 (37%) than those who have not been hospitalised in the last 6 months i.e., 31 (20.1%) (p = 0.0190). Antibiotics are more likely to be given to hospitalised patients, which may contribute to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as Klebsiella species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref55">55</xref>] . Furthermore, hospitalisation might deplete the immune system, rendering patients more vulnerable to infections [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref55">55</xref>] . In addition, hospitalised patients are more likely to have invasive medical procedures such as catheterization, which increases the risk of UTI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref56">56</xref>] . This study’s results are similar to those of Khan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref57">57</xref>] , who reported a prevalence of 39% for uropathogenic bacteria, including Klebsiella species, among clinically diagnosed patients.</p><p>As regards the number of sexual intercourses per week, those who had less than 3 sexual intercourse per week had a reported Klebsiella prevalence of 14.6%, while those who had more than 3 sexual intercourses in a week had a prevalence of 18.6%, though not statistically significant (p = 0.3729). This finding is comparable with the study by Amiri et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref49">49</xref>] where sexual intercourse of ≥ 3 times per week was associated with a greater frequency of UTI. The findings of Emiru et al. (2013) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref52">52</xref>] also agree with the findings of the current study as they reported a higher prevalence in those with 3 or more sexual intercourses in a week (25%) than those who had less than 3 (8.7%); the study by Haider et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref51">51</xref>] also corroborates the results of the current study. This association has been observed in both sporadic and chronic cystitis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref58">58</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref59">59</xref>] . Since sexual intercourse disrupts the usual lactobacillus-dominant vaginal flora and facilitates enteric bacterial colonisation of the vagina, the mechanical motion of sexual intercourse may encourage the passage of uropathogens into the urethra and bladder causing UTIs in the process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref60">60</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref61">61</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref62">62</xref>] .</p><p>Subjects with multiple sex partners in the current study recorded a prevalence of 10.6%, while those who do not have multiple sex partners recorded a prevalence of 13.9%. The observed distribution was not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.4073). This finding varied from the study by Amadi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref63">63</xref>] who attributed a higher prevalence of UTI to promiscuous subjects. The review by Arnold et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref64">64</xref>] highlights new or multiple sex partners as independent risk factors for recurrent UTIs in premenopausal women.</p><p>Among the females in the sampled population, the number of previous pregnancies was found to be significantly associated with the prevalence of Klebsiella, a prevalence of 17.9% was recorded among those who have had less than 3 previous pregnancies while 36.1% Klebsiella prevalence was reported among subjects who have had 3 or more previous pregnancies. Multiparity has been linked to considerable bacteriuria in pregnancy, with a two-fold increase in the risk of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref65">65</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref66">66</xref>] . The association between multiparity and UTI is owing to extensive physiologic changes affecting the whole urinary system during pregnancy, which have a considerable influence on the natural history of UTI during pregnancy. These modifications differ from patient to patient and are more common in women who have multiple consecutive pregnancies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref67">67</xref>] . This finding is consistent with previous research that has shown an association between multiparity and UTI, including studies on UTI in Nigeria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref28">28</xref>] , asymptomatic pregnant women in Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref68">68</xref>] , and UTI in Pakistan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref51">51</xref>] . The findings contrasted with other studies, such as those conducted in Ethiopia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref52">52</xref>] , Sudan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref53">53</xref>] , Tanzania [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref69">69</xref>] , Ghana [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref70">70</xref>] , and Iran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.126071-ref71">71</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>This study shows that the prevalence of uropathogenic Klebsiella species was 16%, with the sex and pregnancy status of the subjects being significantly associated (p &lt; 0.05) with the prevalence of the infection. Frequent antibiotic use, previous UTI infection, hospitalization in the last 6 months as well as multigravidity were also found to be significant risk factors for uropathogenic Klebsiella species in the current study. Health promotion and awareness efforts should be prioritised to inform susceptible demographics about their risks for Klebsiella associated with urinary tract infections via targeted educational campaigns, collaboration with healthcare providers, use of social media and online platforms, workplace wellness programs, and community outreach programs amongst others.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Limitations of the Study</title><p>A limitation of the study is that it relied solely on standard bacteriological techniques for the identification and characterization of uropathogenic Klebsiella species. While these techniques are commonly used and provide valuable information, they have certain limitations. Standard bacteriological techniques typically focus on culturing and identifying microorganisms based on their phenotypic characteristics, such as morphology and biochemical properties. However, they may not capture the full genetic diversity and potential subtypes within the uropathogenic Klebsiella species.</p><p>Moreover, the study utilized Chi-square analysis to associate risk factors with the infection. While Chi-square analysis is a commonly used statistical method for analyzing categorical data, it may oversimplify the complex relationships between risk factors and Uropathogenic Klebsiella infection. This analysis assumes independence between variables and does not account for potential confounding factors or interactions among variables, which could limit the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the findings.</p><p>Further studies incorporating advanced molecular techniques and multivariable analysis methods could provide a more comprehensive evaluation of this bacterial infection and its risk factors.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors appreciate the patients for consenting to participate in this study. We are also grateful to the officials and administrators of the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital, the Rivers State University Medical Centre, as well as the Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt for facilitating this study.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Conflicts of Interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mike-Ogburia, M.I., Monsi, T.P. and Nwokah, E.G. (2023) Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Uropathogenic Klebsiella species in Port Harcourt. Advances in Infectious Diseases, 13, 333-353. https://doi.org/10.4236/aid.2023.132030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.126071-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turyatunga, G., Wito, S.G. and Muwagunzi, E. (2021) Antibacterial Susceptibility Patterns of Common Bacterial Species Associated with Urinary Tract Infections in Patients Attending Kam Medical and Diagnostic Centre, Kampala Uganda. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 2, 1-10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gajdács, M., ábrók, M., Lázár, A. and Burián, K. (2019) Comparative Epidemiology and Resistance Trends of Common Urinary Pathogens in a Tertiary-Care Hospital: A 10-Year Surveillance Study. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 55, Article No. 356. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55070356</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Signing, A.T., Marbou, W.J.T., Penlap Beng, V. and Kuete, V. (2020) Antibiotic Resistance Profile of Uropathogenic Bacteria in Diabetic Patients at the Bafoussam Regional Hospital, West Cameroon Region. Cureus, 12, e9345. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9345</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jans&amp;#229;ker, F., Li, X. and Sundquist, K. (2021) Sociodemographic Factors and Uncomplicated Cystitis in Women Aged 15-50 Years: A Nationwide Swedish Cohort Registry Study (1997-2018). The Lancet Regional Health—Europe, 4, Article ID: 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Casey, J.A., Rudolph, K.E., Robinson, S.C., Bruxvoort, K., Raphael, E., Hong, V., Pressman, A., Morello-Frosch, R., Wei, R.X. and Tartof, S.Y. (2021) Sociodemographic Inequalities in Urinary Tract Infection in 2 Large California Health Systems. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 8, ofab276. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofab276</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oladeinde, B.H., Omoregie, R., Olley, M. and Anunibe, J.A. (2011) Urinary Tract Infection in a Rural Community of Nigeria. North American Journal of Medical Sciences, 3, 75-77. https://doi.org/10.4297/najms.2011.375</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abubakar, U. (2020) Point-Prevalence Survey of Hospital Acquired Infections in Three Acute Care Hospitals in Northern Nigeria. Antimicrobial Resistance &amp; Infection Control, 9, Article No. 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00722-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Medina, M. and Castillo-Pino, E. (2019) An Introduction to the Epidemiology and Burden of Urinary Tract Infections. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 11, 1756287219832172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287219832172</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rico, E.B. and Cruz, J.F.J. (2002) Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy and Menopause. Archivos Espanoles de Urologia, 55, 1165-1179.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nelius, T., Winter, C., Willingham, J. and Filleur, S. (2013) Immune-Based Treatment Strategies for Patients with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections-Where Are We? In: Nelius, T., Ed., Recent Advances in the Field of Urinary Tract Infections, IntechOpen, London, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.5772/52913</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maskell, R. (1989) Urinary Tract Infections in Men. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 299, Article No. 122. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6691.122-a</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McAllister, S.C. and Beneri, C. (2015) Prostate Abscess in an Adolescent with AIDS. Global Pediatric Health, 2, 2333794X15582260. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X15582260</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yusuf, M.A., Begum, A. and Ahsan, C.R. (2015) Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Gram Negative Uropathogenic Bacilli at a Private Hospital in Dhaka City. Al Ameen Journal of Medical Sciences, 8, 189-194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkitapathi, S., Wijesundara, Y.H., Cornelius, S.A., Herbert, F.C., Gassensmith, J.J., Zimmern, P.E. and De Nisco, N.J. (2022) Conserved FimK Truncation Coincides with Increased Expression of Type 3 Fimbriae and Cultured Bladder Epithelial Cell Association in Klebsiella quasipneumoniae. Journal of Bacteriology, 204, e0017222. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00172-22</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koksal, E., Tulek, N., Sonmezer, M.C., Temocin, F., Bulut, C., Hatipoglu, C., Erdinc, F.S. and Ertem, G. (2019) Investigation of Risk Factors for Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Escherichia coli and Klebsiella Species. Investigative and Clinical Urology, 60, 46-53. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2019.60.1.46</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Polse, R.F., Qarani, S.M., Assafi, M.S., Sabaly, N. and Ali, F. (2020) Incidence and Antibiotic Sensitivity of Klebsiella Pneumonia Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection Patients in Zakho Emergency Hospital/Iraq. Journal of Education and Science, 29, 257-268. https://doi.org/10.33899/edusj.2020.126827.1056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndako, J.A., Solomon, O., Owolabi, A., Fajobi, V., Okolie, C., Akinwunmi, J. and Phiobor, G.O. (2019) Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection in a Rural Community of South-West, Nigeria. Saudi Journal of Biomedical Research, 4, 306-311. https://doi.org/10.36348/SJBR.2019.v04i09.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kinika, R.W., Uzor, B.C. and Solomon, L. (2015) Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections among Patients Who Attended University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Choba. Academia Arena, 7, 22-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mike-Ogburia, M.I., Dio, A., Nwogu, V.C., Vito-Peter, B., Hart, G.M., Ideozu, N.O., Albert, O.C., Mike-Ogburia, M.N., Obunwo, C.O., Okoro, O.C., Ogbakiri, P.A., Angala, P.O., Jumbo, U.K. and Mike-Ogburia, A.C. (2023) Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of COVID-19 in an Incarcerated Population Burdened with HIV Infections in Port Harcourt. World Journal of AIDS, 13, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.4236/wja.2023.132004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Naing, L., Winn, T. and Rusli, B.N. (2006) Sample Size Calculator for Prevalence Studies. Archives of Orofacial Sciences, 1, 9-14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmood, M. (2011) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Pathogens in Urinary Tract Infections. Journal of Al-Nahrain University, 14, 146-152. https://doi.org/10.22401/JNUS.14.4.20</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sewify, M., Nair, S., Warsame, S., Murad, M., Alhubail, A., Behbehani, K., Al-Refaei, F. and Tiss, A. (2016) Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility among Diabetic Patients with Controlled and Uncontrolled Glycemia in Kuwait. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2016, Article ID: 6573215. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6573215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, W.H., Wang, M.C., Tseng, C.C., Ko, W.C., Wu, A.B., Zheng, P.X. and Wu, J.J. (2010) Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Causing Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections. Infection, 38, 459-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-010-0049-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oluwafemi, T.T., Akinbodewa, A.A., Ogunleye, A. and Adejumo, O.A. (2018) Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Uropathogens in a Tertiary Hospital in South West, Nigeria. Sahel Medical Journal, 21, 18-22. https://doi.org/10.4103/1118-8561.232779</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dada, E.O. and Alagha, B. (2021) Urinary Schistosomiasis and Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Individuals of Ipogun, Nigeria: Detection of Predominant Microorganisms and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile. Journal of Medical and Health Studies, 2, 70-80. https://doi.org/10.32996/jmhs.2021.2.2.8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vasudevan, R. (2014) Urinary Tract Infection: An Overview of the Infection and the Associated Risk Factors. Journal of Microbiology &amp; Experimentation, 1, 42-54. https://doi.org/10.15406/jmen.2014.01.00008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bitew, A., Molalign, T. and Chanie, M. (2017) Species Distribution and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Bacterial Uropathogens among Patients Complaining Urinary Tract Infections. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17, Article No. 654. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2743-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okonko, I.O., Ijandipe, L.A., Ilusanya, O.A., Donbraye-Emmanuel, O.B., Ejembi, J., Udeze, A.O., Egun, O.C., Fowotade, A. and Nkang, A.O. (2009) Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) among Pregnant Women in Ibadan, South-Western Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8, 6649-6657. https://doi.org/10.21161/mjm.14708</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sule, H. and Kumurya, A.S. (2016) The Prevalence of Klebsiella Species Causing Urinary Tract Infections in Murtala Muhammad Specialist Hospital, Kano, Nigeria. American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences, 4, 11-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20160402.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Obiogbolu, C.H., Okonko, I.O., Anyamere, C.O., Adedeji, A.O., Akanbi, A.O., Ogun, A.A., Ejembi, J. and Faleye, T.O.C. (2009) Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) among Pregnant Women in Akwa Metropolis, Southeastern Nigeria. Scientific Research and Essays, 4, 820-824.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devrari, J.C. and Pai, V. (2018) Characterization of Various Virulence Properties of Drug-Resistant Klebsiella Isolates: An in Vitro Study among “Superbugs”. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 11, 138-141. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i4.23965</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sen, A., Iyer, J., Boddu, S., Kaul, A. and Kaul, R. (2019) Estrogen Receptor Alpha Differentially Modulates Host Immunity in the Bladder and Kidney in Response to Urinary Tract Infection. American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Urology, 7, 110-122.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wammanda, R.D., Aikhionbare, H.A. and Ogala, W.N. (2000) Use of Nitrite Dipstick Test in the Screening for Urinary Tract Infection in Children. West African Journal of Medicine, 19, 206-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aiyegoro, O.A., Igbinosa, O.O., Ogunmwonyi, I.N., Odjadjare, E.E., Igbinosa, O.E. and Okoh, A.I. (2007) Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) among Children and Adolescents in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research, 1, 13-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Omoregie, R., Erebor, J.O., Ahonkhai, I., Isibor, J.O. and Ogefere, H.O. (2008) Observed Changes in the Prevalence of Uropathogens in Benin City, Nigeria. New Zealand Journal of Medical Laboratory Science, 62, 29-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohanty, J.R., Pradhan, A., Jena, S., Misra, P.R., Padhi, B. and Soren, D. (2018) Hygiene and Wash Practices Associated with Urinary Tract Infection among Non-Pregnant Women at Capital Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7, 1743-1753. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.206</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otajevwo, F.D. and Amedu, S.S. (2015) Community Acquired Urinary Tract Infection Prevalence in a Tertiary Institution Based in Evbuobanosa, Edo State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Medical Research, 15, 52-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Odoki, M., Almustapha Aliero, A., Tibyangye, J., Nyabayo Maniga, J., Wampande, E., Drago Kato, C. and Bazira, J. (2019) Prevalence of Bacterial Urinary Tract Infections and Associated Factors among Patients Attending Hospitals in Bushenyi District, Uganda. International Journal of Microbiology, 2019, Article ID: 4246780. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4246780</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Campos, V.R.V., Vieira, G.S., Ramos, L.F. and Baptista, A.B. (2022) Etiological and Susceptibility Profile of Microorganisms Causing Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women in the City of Palmas, Brazil. Research, Society and Development, 11, e200111536973. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i15.36973</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Borkotoki, U., Borkotoki, S., Barua, P., Das, A. and Rajkhowa, P. (2016) Bacteriological Profile of Urinary Tract Infections among Pregnant Women (Clinically Suspected of Having UTIs) in a Tertiary Care Hospital. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 6, 119-124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ndako, J.A., Owolabi, A., Olatinsu, O., Omolade, A.O. and Ifeanyi, I. (2020) Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection among Adult Females in Omu-Aran South-West Nigeria. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology, 6, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.9734/sajrm/2020/v6i130140</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tehrani, F.J., Nikpour, S., Kazemi, E.A.H., Sanaie, N. and Panahi, S.A.S. (2014) The Effect of Education Based on Health Belief Model on Health Beliefs of Women with Urinary Tract Infection. International Journal of Community Based Nursing and Midwifery, 2, 2-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shaheen, H.M., Farahat, T.M. and Hammad, N.A.E.H. (2016) Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection among Pregnant Women and Possible Risk Factors. Menoufia Medical Journal, 29, 1055-1059.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Markland, A., Chu, H., Epperson, C.N., Nodora, J., Shoham, D., Smith, A., Sutcliffe, S., Townsend, M., Zhou, J., Bavendam, T. and Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium (2018) Occupation and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis from the PLUS Research Consortium. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 37, 2881-2892. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23806</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baquero, F. (2001) Low-Level Antibacterial Resistance: A Gateway to Clinical Resistance. Drug Resistance Updates, 4, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1054/drup.2001.0196</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, H.Y., Lee, S.J., Lee, D.S., Yoo, J.M. and Choe, H.S. (2016) Microbiological Characteristics of Unresolved Acute Uncomplicated Cystitis. Microbial Drug Resistance, 22, 387-391. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2015.0241</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyko, E.J., Fihn, S.D., Scholes, D., Chen, C.L., Normand, E.H. and Yarbro, P. (2002) Diabetes and the Risk of Acute Urinary Tract Infection among Postmenopausal Women. Diabetes Care, 25, 1778-1783. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.10.1778</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Foxman, B., Somsel, P., Tallman, P., Gillespie, B., Raz, R., Colodner, R. and Sobel, J.D. (2001) Urinary Tract Infection among Women Aged 40 to 65: Behavioral and Sexual Risk Factors. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 710-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00352-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amiri, F.N., Rooshan, M.H., Ahmady, M.H. and Soliamani, M.J. (2009) Hygiene Practices and Sexual Activity Associated with Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnant Women. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 15, 104-110. https://doi.org/10.26719/2009.15.1.104</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scholes, D., Hooton, T.M., Roberts, P.L., Gupta, K., Stapleton, A.E. and Stamm, W.E. (2005) Risk Factors Associated with Acute Pyelonephritis in Healthy Women. Annals of Internal Medicine, 142, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Haider, G., Zehra, N., Munir, A.A. and Haider, A. (2010) Risk Factors of Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 60, 213-216.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Emiru, T., Beyene, G., Tsegaye, W. and Melaku, S. (2013) Associated Risk Factors of Urinary Tract Infection among Pregnant Women at Felege Hiwot Referral Hospital, Bahir Dar, North West Ethiopia. BMC Research Notes, 6, Article No. 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-292</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hamdan, H.Z., Ziad, A.H.M., Ali, S.K. and Adam, I. (2011) Epidemiology of Urinary Tract Infections and Antibiotics Sensitivity among Pregnant Women at Khartoum North Hospital. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 10, Article No. 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-10-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kovavisarach, E., Vichaipruck, M. and Kanjarahareutai, S. (2009) Risk Factors Related to Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 92, 606-610.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, N., Gupta, A.K., Walia, G. and Bakhshi, R. (2016) A Retrospective Study of the Changing Trends of Antimicrobial Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Urine Samples over Last 3 Years (2012-2014). Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine, 7, 39-42. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.175060</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Siqueira e Silva, M.F., de Sena, F.C.R., Agostinho, F., Almeida Medeiros, K.K., Miguel, C.B. and Rodrigues, W.F. (2017) Urinary Tract Infection Related to Hospitalized Patients: A Review. Archive of Urological Research, 1, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.17352/aur.000001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khan, M., Manhas, A., Mittal, S. and Rathish, K.C. (2021) Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Uropathogens in Patients Attending in a Tertiary Care Hospital. International Journal of Scientific Research, 10, 28-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Handley, M.A., Reingold, A.L., Shiboski, S. and Padian, N.S. (2002) Incidence of Acute Urinary Tract Infection in Young Women and Use of Male Condoms with and without Nonoxynol-9 Spermicides. Epidemiology, 13, 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200207000-00011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nguyen, H. and Weir, M. (2002) Urinary Tract Infection as a Possible Marker for Teenage Sex. Southern Medical Journal, 95, 867-870. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-200295080-00017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, P.D. and Foxman, B. (2000) Pathogenesis of Urinary Tract Infection: The Role of Sexual Behavior and Sexual Transmission. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 2, 513-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-000-0054-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kolawole, A.S., Kolawole, O.M., Kandaki-Olukemi, Y.T., Babatunde, S.K., Durowade, K.A. and Kolawole, C.F. (2009) Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) among Patients Attending Dalhatu Araf Specialist Hospital, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. International Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences, 1, 163-167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Varghese, A., George, S., Gopalakrishnan, R. and Mathew, A. (2016) Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Cases of Urinary Tract Infection in a Tertiary Care Setup. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 5, 1470-1474. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2016/346</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amadi, L.O., Bulo, Z.B. and Dimkpa, F.N. (2015) Assessment of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and Antibiogram of Bacterial Isolates from Female Patients in Khana Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria. Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 183-188.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnold, J.J., Hehn, L.E. and Klein, D.A. (2016) Common Questions about Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Women. American Family Physician, 93, 560-569.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cram, L.F., Zapata, M.I., Toy, E.C. and Baker, B. (2002) Genitourinary Infections and Their Association with Preterm Labor. American Family Physician, 65, 241-248.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sescon, N.I.C., Garingalao, M. and Ycasiano, C.E.J. (2003) Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Associated Risk Factors in Pregnant Women. Philippine Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 32, 63-69.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nandy, P., Thakur, A.R. and Ray, C.S. (2007) Characterization of Bacterial Strains Isolated through Microbial Profiling of Urine Samples. OnLine Journal of Biological Sciences, 7, 44-51. https://doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2007.44.51</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Enayat, K., Fariba, F. and Bahram, N. (2008) Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women Referred to Outpatient Clinics in Sanandaj, Iran. International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 34, 699-707. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382008000600004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Masinde, A., Gumodoka, B., Kilonzo, A. and Mshana, S.E. (2009) Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection among Pregnant Women at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, 11, 154-159. https://doi.org/10.4314/thrb.v11i3.47704</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turton, J., Davies, F., Turton, J., Perry, C., Payne, Z. and Pike, R. (2019) Hybrid Resistance and Virulence Plasmids in “High-Risk” Clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Including Those Carrying blaNDM-5. Microorganisms, 7, Article No. 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090326</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.126071-ref71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hazhir</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Pregnant Women</article-title><source> Urology Journal</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 24</fpage>-<lpage>27</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>